Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic single anastomosis gastric bypass (LSAGB) for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in lower BMI (<30 kg/m(2)) patients

"Metabolic surgery in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and body mass index less than 30kg/m2: A systematic review"

Background

The effect of metabolic surgery on long-term diabetes remission in Asian patients with a body mass index (BMI) < 30 kg/m2 has not been widely reported.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review of the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases from inception to June 2024. All clinical trials and observational studies involving the effect of metabolic surgery in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and BMI <30 kg/m2 were considered. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.

Results

Of the 1175 studies screened, 21 studies (11 prospective and 10 retrospective), including 1005 patients, were selected. Only one study had a control group. The longest follow-up was 60 months. The results showed significant improvement in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting blood glucose (FBG), 2-h plasma glucose (2hPG), homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR), fasting C-peptide, triglycerides, total cholesterol, and a reduction in the use of oral hypoglycemic agents/insulin at 12, 24, 36, and 60 months after metabolic surgery. The most common surgical complications observed were anemia (2.1 %-33 %), marginal ulcer (4.2 %-17.3 %), gastrointestinal bleeding (1.9 %-12 %), anastomotic leak (2.1 %-3.5 %), anastomotic stenosis (2.1 %-3.5 %), reoperation (1.18 %), and a mortality rate of zero.

Conclusions

Long-term diabetes remission, along with improvements in HbA1c, 2hPG, FBG, and HOMA-IR, with an acceptable rate of complications, was observed in Asian patients with BMI <30 kg/m2 after metabolic surgery. Future research with controlled studies should focus on preoperative patient selection criteria beyond just the BMI cutoff.

Scientific Evidence for the Updated Guidelines on Indications for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (IFSO/ASMBS)

The 2022 American Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) and International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO) updated the indications for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (MBS), replacing the previous guidelines established by the NIH over 30 years ago. The evidence supporting these updated guidelines has been strengthened to assist metabolic and bariatric surgeons, nutritionists, and other members of multidisciplinary teams, as well as patients. This study aims to assess the level of evidence and the strength of recommendations compared to the previously published criteria.

Scientific evidence for the updated guidelines on indications for metabolic and bariatric surgery (IFSO/ASMBS)

The 2022 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) and International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO) updated the indications for metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS), replacing the previous guidelines established by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) over 30 years ago. The evidence supporting these updated guidelines has been strengthened to assist metabolic and bariatric surgeons, nutritionists, and other members of multidisciplinary teams (MDTs), as well as patients. This study aims to assess the level of evidence and the strength of recommendations compared to the previously published criteria.

Midterm outcomes of one anastomosis gastric bypass for patients with BMI < 35 kg/m2 from a large single center

BACKGROUND

One-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is gaining more attention in patients with severe obesity and recently is used for patients with body mass index (BMI) < 35 kg/m2. In this 5-year single center experience we aim to report our outcomes of using OAGB for patients with BMI < 35 kg/m2.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data recorded in to our national obesity registry database. Variables including age, sex, weight, BMI, any associated disease, blood levels of metabolic markers, nutrients, and vitamins before and after surgery were extracted and analyzed.

RESULTS

173 patients with mean age and BMI of 41 ± 10 years and 33 ± 1 kg/m2 underwent OAGB and at least one of the obesity-associated medical problems was found in 88 (50.5%) of them preoperatively. The mean duration of surgery and length of hospital stay were 60.7 ± 7.4 min and 1.3 ± 1.4 days. 78% and 70% of patients had available data at 24 and 60 months, respectively. The mean BMI was 23.9 ± 2.2 kg/m2 1 year after surgery and each year after that till 5 years was 24 ± 2, 24.4 ± 2.6, 25.1 ± 2.7, and 25.5 ± 2.7 kg/m2. Significant improvement in levels of fasting blood glucose, lipid profile, and liver enzymes were observed.

CONCLUSION

OAGB for BMI < 35 kg/m2 has significant effects in weight loss, helps remit diabetes and hypertension in the majority of cases, improves lipid profile, and has no increased burden of postoperative problems or deficiency in nutritional factors rather than what is known and predictable.

Mid-Term Diabetes Remission Outcome in Patients with BMI ≤ 30 kg/m2 Following Sleeve Gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

Bariatric and metabolic surgery is recommended for Asian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and BMI ≥ 27.5 kg/m2. However, mid to long-term ·evidence is still lacking.

METHODS

Patients' data that underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) as the primary surgery at the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University were analyzed. Patients with T2DM diagnosed with either fasting blood glucose (FBG) ≥ 7.0 mmol/L or glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level ≥ 7.0% and 27.5 ≤ BMI ≤ 30 kg/m2 were included.

RESULTS

24 patients (7 male and 17 female) were included in this study. With a mean follow-up duration of 4.5 ± 1.1 years, the mean percentage of total weight loss (%TWL) was 14.4 ± 6.7%. Postoperatively, nine patients (37%) still required oral anti-diabetic medications, while no patients used insulin. FBG and HbA1c levels declined to 6.3 ± 1.5 mmol/L and 6.0 ± 1.0%, respectively. Fifteen patients (63%) were with HbA1c levels < 7% and without medication requirements, five patients (21%) were with HbA1c levels < 7% with the help of oral anti-diabetic medication, and four patients (16%) were with HbA1c levels > 7% with the help of oral anti-diabetic medication.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provides further evidence that SG could result in both T2DM improvement and remission in patients with BMI ≤ 30 kg/m2. Longer follow-up duration and larger sample will be needed in the future.

Mid-Long-Term Effect of Metabolic Surgery on Type 2 Diabetes in Nonobese Patients: a Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to perform a meta-analysis regarding the mid-long-term effect (≥ 2-year follow-up) of metabolic surgery on T2DM in non-obese patients.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE and CENTRAL databases were searched for clinical studies from inception to March 2023. Stata 12.0 was used for data aggregation. Sensitivity, subgroup, and meta-regression analyses were performed when feasible.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis included 18 articles involving 548 patients. A pooled rate of 47.5% of T2DM remission was found after metabolic surgery. To be more specific, 83.5% was obtained for hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) < 7.0%, 45.1% for HbA1c < 6.5%, and 40.4% for HbA1c < 6.0%. Subgroup analysis showed that one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) had a higher remission rate (93.9%) than other surgeries. Studies conducted in America had a higher remission rate (61.4%) than in Asia (43.6%). Meta-regression analysis displayed that publication year, number of patients, study design, preoperative age, BMI, and quality assessment score were not significantly associated with T2DM remission rate. Additionally, metabolic surgery could result in significant reductions in BMI (-4.133 kg/m2), weight (-9.874 kg), HbA1c (-1.939%), fasting blood glucose, fasting C-peptide, and fasting insulin. However, metabolic surgery seemed to have poorer glycemic control in non-obese than obese T2DM patients.

CONCLUSION

A moderate mid-long-term effect of T2DM remission was observed after metabolic surgery in non-obese patients. However, we still need more prospective multi-institutional studies using the same definitions for diabetes and the same surgical technique for the surgery. Without this, the exact role of bariatric surgery in non-obese patients is unanswered.

The effects of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and one-anastomosis gastric bypass on glycemic control and remission of type 2 diabetes mellitus: study protocol for a multi-center randomized controlled trial (the DIABAR-trial)

Background

Metabolic surgery induces rapid remission of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). There is a paucity of high level evidence comparing the efficacy of the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and the laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) in glycemic control. Also, the mechanisms that drive the conversion of T2DM in severe obese subjects to euglycemia are poorly understood.

Methods

The DIABAR-trial is an open, multi-center, randomized controlled clinical trial with 10 years follow-up which will be performed in 220 severely obese patients, diagnosed with T2DM and treated with glucose-lowering agents. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to undergo RYGB or OAGB. The primary outcome is glycemic control at 12 months follow-up. Secondary outcome measures are diverse and include weight loss, surgical complications, psychologic status and quality of life, dietary behavior, gastrointestinal symptoms, repetitive bloodwork to identify changes over time, glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity as measured by mixed meal tests, remission of T2DM, presence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease/non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in liver biopsy, oral and fecal microbiome, cardiovascular performance, composition of bile acids, and the tendency to develop gallstones.

Discussion

The DIABAR-trial is one of the few randomized controlled trials primarily aimed to evaluate the glycemic response after the RYGB and OAGB in severe obese patients diagnosed with T2DM. Secondary aims of the trial are to contribute to a deeper understanding of the mechanisms that drive the remission of T2DM in severe obese patients by identification of microbial, immunological, and metabolic markers for metabolic response and to compare complications and side effects of RYGB and OAGB.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03330756; date first registered: October 13, 2017.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06762-3.

Long-Term Results of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: a Single Center Experience with a Minimum Follow-Up of 10 Years

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the OAGB at least 10 years after surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed our prospectively collected data on consecutive morbid patients with obesity receiving OAGB from January 2005 to December 2007.

RESULTS

A total of 385 patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean follow-up was 149 months. Of all patients, 52% underwent OAGB as a primary procedure and 48% as a revisional procedure. At the 10-year follow-up, the mean body mass index (BMI) was 30.7 ± 11.8, the mean %TWL was 33.4 ± 10.6, and the mean %EWL was 64.1 ± 24.6. We did not find a significant statistical difference in terms of weight loss between primary OAGB and secondary OAGB. In total, 43% of patients achieved a %EWL greater than 75%, while 29% of the patients had an EWL% that was below 50%. All of the comorbidities related to obesity showed a high improvement or fully resolved. Early complications occurred in 9 patients (2.3%), while the overall rate of late complications was 17.1%. Nineteen patients (4.9%) developed an ulcer at the gastrojejunal anastomosis level, nine patients (2.3%) were re-hospitalized for major malnutrition, thirty-eight patients (9.8%) showed a postoperative biliary reflux, and five patients (2.7%) experienced severe anemia, which required several hospitalizations for iron I.V. supplementation.

CONCLUSION

According to results of the present study, we believe that OAGB has shown to be a technique with a reasonable balance between long-term efficacy and undesirable sequelae.

IFSO Update Position Statement on One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB)

The International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO) issued a position statement on the role of one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) in the field of bariatric/metabolic surgery in 2018 De Luca et al. (Obes Surg. 28(5):1188-206, 2018). This position statement was issued by the IFSO OAGB task force and approved by the IFSO Scientific Committee and IFSO Executive Board. In 2018, the OAGB task force recognized the necessity to update the position statement in the following 2 years since additional high-quality data could emerge. The updated IFSO position statement on OAGB was issued also in response to inquiries to the IFSO by society members, universities, hospitals, physicians, insurances, patients, policy makers, and media. The IFSO position statement on OAGB has been reviewed within 2 years according to the availability of additional scientific evidence. The recommendation of the statement is derived from peer-reviewed scientific literature and available knowledge. The IFSO update position statement on OAGB will again be reviewed in 2 years provided additional high-quality studies emerge.

A Systematic Review of One Anastomosis/Mini Gastric Bypass as a Metabolic Operation for Patients with Body Mass Index ≤ 35 kg/m2

BACKGROUND

One anastomosis/mini gastric bypass (OAGB-MGB) is now an established bariatric procedure for patients suffering from obesity. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the role of this operation in patients with body mass index (BMI) ≤ 35 kg/m².

METHODS

A literature review was performed as per preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

RESULTS

This review reports cumulative results of 376 OAGB-MGB procedures with a mean age of 44.28 years and mean BMI of 29.16 kg/m² (range 22-35). Females represented 67.67% of the patients. The leak rate was 0.27%. The mean follow-up was 32.6 months (6-84 months). The mean operative time was 89.45 min. The median limb length was 120 cm (range 100-200 cm). The mean fasting plasma glucose (FPG) decreased from 196.97 to 103.28 mg/dL. The mean HbA1c came down from 9.13% preoperatively to 6.14% postoperatively. The total cholesterol levels came down from a mean of 197.8 mg/dL preoperatively to 120.6 mg/dL postoperatively. The low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and triglyceride levels came down from 127.7 and 209.3 mg/dL to 81 and 94.8 mg/dL, respectively. Mortality was 0%. Marginal ulceration rate of 6.3% and an anaemia rate of 4.7% were reported. Low albumin was reported in 1 (0.2%) patient. The mean BMI came down to 23.76 kg/m² at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that there is now satisfactory evidence to consider OAGB-MGB as a safe and effective metabolic procedure for diabetic patients with BMI ≤ 35 kg/m². Randomised studies comparing different bariatric procedures with longer term follow-up are needed.

Metabolic Outcomes of Surgery for Non-Obese Type 2 Diabetes

The most plausible contributing factor to non-obese type 2 diabetes may be imbalanced incretin release from the intestinal epithelium in response to nutrients. Rerouting intestinal continuity through bypass surgery to modulate incretin release is therefore a reasonable treatment. We believe that a major determinant of metabolic outcomes is entire duodenal exclusion without leaving any duodenal epithelium and exclusion of sufficient length of jejunum. More importantly, the procedure should be implemented with safety and without sequelae. To achieve this, we invented a novel procedure with acceptable surgical safety and excellent and durable metabolic outcomes. Post-surgical intestinal adaptation should be considered to achieve successful outcomes.

Short- and Mid-term Outcomes of 527 One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass/Mini-Gastric Bypass (OAGB/MGB) Operations: Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

One anastomosis gastric bypass/mini-gastric bypass (OAGB/MGB) is considered an alternative option in metabolic and bariatric surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, efficacy and postoperative challenges of OAGB/MGB as a new procedure.

METHODS

We performed 519 primary MGBs and 8 additional second-stage MGBs during 2014-2018. The data were collected from patients' notes as well as the surgeons' prospective data sheets. Two senior surgeons performed the operations. The ultimate primary measures were assessment of the safety and management of the complications. The secondary outcomes were excess weight loss and resolution of the comorbidities.

RESULTS

The type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remission rate was 83% and 70% over 1 and 3 years, respectively (HBA1C < 6.5%). Weight loss was 28-152 kg (SD 23.11). Excess weight loss ranged from 41 to 125%. Hypertension resolution was 61%, 58% and 58% in the first, second and third years, respectively. Ninety-nine per cent of sleep apnoea patients improved symptomatically and went off the continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) machine. Two (0.37%) patients developed diarrhoea, cured by shortening the afferent biliopancreatic limb (BPL). Eight (1.5%) stomal ulcers were reported. Two patients (0.37%) developed deranged liver function, revised by shortening the BPL in one patient and a reversal in the second patient. The mean follow-up was 2.5 years. Mortality was zero.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest UK OAGB/MGB study to date showing safety and acceptable results for metabolic syndrome and obesity problems. OAGB/MGB revisional options are rectifying the morbidity and no mortality.

Does Metabolic Surgery Lead to Diabetes Remission in Patients with BMI < 30 kg/m2?: a Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Bariatric surgery has demonstrated to be effective in remission of type 2 diabetes in obese patients, but it is unclear in non-obese patients. The aim of this study is to investigate if metabolic surgery is effective in diabetes resolution in patients with BMI < 30 kg/m².

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review was performed and the content of the PubMed, Ovid, and the Cochrane Library databases covering the period January 2008 to April 2018 was searched. Studies with metabolic surgery performed in patients with type 2 diabetes, BMI < 30 kg/m² and a follow-up ≥ 6 months were included. Type 2 diabetes remission rate and metabolic parameters changes were measured. A meta-analysis was conducted with the selected studies.

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies were included in the meta-analysis (1105 patients). The mixed-effects meta-analysis model for overall diabetes remission rate produced an estimate of 43% (95% IC 34-53%, p < 0.001). Moderator effects of the variables race, preoperative HbA1c, BMI, months of follow-up, duration of diabetes, and age on diabetes remission were also assessed, with no significant effects being found in any of them. A reduction in BMI (- 3.57 kg/m²), fasting blood glucose (- 55.93 mg/dL) and HbA1c (- 2.08%) was observed after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Metabolic surgery could be effective in remission of type 2 diabetes in BMI < 30 kg/m² patients but randomized and long-term studies are necessary. The scientific community should agree in a single definition of type 2 diabetes remission, in order to know the real effect of metabolic surgery in this group of patients.

Mini Gastric Bypass-One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (MGB-OAGB)-IFSO Position Statement

PREAMBLE

The International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO) has played an integral role in educating both the metabolic surgical and the medical community at large about the role of innovative and new surgical and/or endoscopic interventions in treating adiposity-based chronic diseases.The mini gastric bypass is also known as the one anastomosis gastric bypass. The IFSO has agreed that the standard nomenclature should be the mini gastric bypass-one anastomosis gastric bypass (MGB-OAGB). The IFSO commissioned a task force (Appendix 1) to determine if MGB-OAGB is an effective and safe procedure and if it should be considered a surgical option for the treatment of obesity and metabolic diseases.The following position statement is issued by the IFSO MGB-OAGB task force and approved by the IFSO Scientific Committee and Executive Board. This statement is based on current clinical knowledge, expert opinion, and published peer-reviewed scientific evidence. It will be reviewed in 2 years.

Laparoscopic metabolic surgery for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in Asia: a scoping review and evidence-based analysis

Background

Laparoscopic metabolic surgery has been previously shown to be an effective treatment for obese patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). The objective of this scoping review is to determine the impact of metabolic surgery for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in Asia and perform an evidence-based analysis.

Methods

We performed a literature search in PubMed for research on laparoscopic metabolic surgery for the treatment of T2DM in Asia region. We classified the included studies based on the Oxford Center for Evidence Based Medicine guidelines. And performed and evidence analysis.

Results

In total, 205 articles were identified. 62.9% of the studies were from East Asia. The evidence of 26 studies are level I, 59 are level II. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) was the most commonly reported surgical procedure (63.1%) in Asia. The number of laparoscopic metabolic surgery for T2DM in Asian countries has increased rapidly over the last 8 years. We identified 16 studies which showed that laparoscopic metabolic surgery is an effective and safe treatment for T2DM in patients with a BMI of > 25 kg/m² to < 35 kg/m² in Asia.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that laparoscopic metabolic surgery might be an effective and safe treatment for T2DM patients with BMI < 35 kg/m², and that LSG is the most commonly performed surgical procedure for this in Asia.

From diabetes remedy to diabetes remission; could single-anastomosis gastric bypass be a safe bridge to reach target in non-obese patients?

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is considered a chronic progressive incurable metabolic disease. Single-anastomosis gastric bypass (SAGB) has proved to be effective in obese patients, yet its impact on non-obese diabetics is not extensively studied. The aim is to determine the anthropometric and glycemic outcomes of SAGB as a proposed line of treatment for T2DM patients with body mass index (BMI) 25-30 kg/m².

METHODS

From November 2013 to March 2016, a prospective study has been conducted at Ain-Shams University Hospitals on 17 consecutive patients who have undergone SAGB. The demographic and anthropometric data, as well as the relevant laboratory results, were reported. Complete T2DM remission is considered if glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) <6 % for at least 1 year without medication, whereas partial remission is considered if HbA1c<6.5%.

RESULTS

The mean age was 42.6 ±13.8 years, mean BMI was 26.7 ± 2.3 kg/m² and mean duration of DM was 6.3 ± 2.7 years. The mean baseline values of HbA1c, FPG (fasting plasma glucose), and 2-hours postprandial glucose (2-H PPG) were 9.9%, 176.3 mg/dl, and 310.3 mg/dl respectively. These values significantly dropped at the 18^th month to reach 5.8%, 93.4 mg/dl, and 156.2 mg/dl, with 13/17 patients became off-treatment (complete remission rate 76.4%).

CONCLUSION

T2DM patients with BMI 25-30 kg/m² are considered the most controversial group. SAGB is an efficient metabolic procedure and could be integrated into the treatment algorithm of T2DM. Such line of treatment opens new horizons to change the concept of treatment from diabetes remedy to diabetes remission.

Effects of Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Comparison of BMI > 30 and < 30 kg/m2

Background

Recently, many studies focused on type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients with body mass index (BMI) < 30 kg/m² and suggested that those patients might benefit from Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). However, evidence on its effectiveness to improve T2DM patients with BMI < 30 kg/m² is still lacking. The aim of this study is to explore whether T2DM patients with BMI < 30 kg/m² get similar surgical effect from RYGB compared with those patients with BMI > 30 kg/m².

Methodology

Seventy patients with uncontrolled T2DM underwent laparoscopic RYGB from May 2010 to December 2015 in the GI Department of Daping Hospital. Weight, BMI, waist circumference, glucose, and lipid metabolic parameters were collected and evaluated at baseline and 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postsurgery. Patients with BMI < 30 kg/m² were compared with those with BMI > 30 kg/m².

Results

Among the 70 patients, 47 (67.1%) BMI < 30 kg/m², and 23 (32.9%) BMI > 30 kg/m². Patients with BMI < 30 kg/m² are significantly older; they are female predominant and have longer duration of diabetes. The complete remission of T2DM was 28.2% of the BMI < 30 kg/m² group and 57.9% of the BMI > 30 kg/m² group (p = 0.029). There was no significant difference in the change of glucose and lipid metabolic parameters of both groups. FPG, 2hPG, and HbA1c% levels were significantly improved after 1 month (p < 0.05), and then remained essentially stable from the sixth month in both groups.

Conclusions

The 2-year study has shown that RYGB is a safe and effective procedure in treating T2DM with BMI < 30 kg/m², although the complete remission of T2DM in the BMI < 30 kg/m² group is lower than the BMI > 30 kg/m² group.

The effect of metabolic surgery on nonobese patients (BMI<30 kg/m2) with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The influence of metabolic surgery on the glucose and lipid profiles of nonobese body mass index<30 kg/m² patients with type 2 diabetes, particularly the effect ≥1 year, remains unknown.

METHODS

PubMed and Ovid Embase were used.

SETTING

University hospitals.

RESULTS

In total, 21 studies including 921 patients were examined in this systematic review, the results of which revealed decrease in body mass index, waist circumference, fasting plasma glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin A1C, fasting C-peptide, fasting insulin, homeostasis model of assessment for insulin resistance index, triglycerides, total cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. An increase in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol was also observed. The diabetes remission rates ranged from 13.3% to 90.2% according to 20 studies. The incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding ranged from 1% to 10% according to 9 studies. Four studies reported anemia after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or one-anastomosis gastric bypass, with the incidence ranging from 8% to 33%.

CONCLUSIONS

Nonobese patients can achieve improvements in weight-related indices and glucose and lipid profiles in the short and medium term after metabolic surgery; however, the complications of metabolic surgery warrant further attention.

A randomized controlled trial of Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy vs. gastroduodenostomy with respect to the improvement of type 2 diabetes mellitus after distal gastrectomy in gastric cancer patients

The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of diabetes control induced by Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy(RY) vs Billroth-I reconstruction(BI) after distal gastrectomy in patients with early gastric cancer(EGC) and type 2 diabetes(T2DM). Forty EGC patients with T2DM, aged 20–80 years, who were expected to undergo curative distal gastrectomy were randomized 1:1 to RY(n = 20) or BI(n = 20). Diabetes medication status, biochemical and hormonal data including blood glucose, HbA1c, insulin, C-peptide, HOMA-IR, ghrelin, leptin, GLP-1, PYY, and GIP were evaluated for 12 months after surgery. Although pre- and postoperative 12-month fasting and postprandial glucose levels did not show a significant difference, HbA1c, C-peptide, and HOMA-IR levels were significantly improved at 12 months after surgery in both BI and RY groups. Sixty percent of RY patients and 20% of BI patients decreased their medication satisfying FBS<126 mg/dL and HbA1c<6.5% and 5% of BI patients stopped their medication satisfying the criteria of FBS<126 mg/dL and HbA1c<6.0%. The improvement patterns were more sustainable with less fluctuation in RY than in BI. On hormonal analysis, ghrelin and leptin levels were decreased and PYY and GIP levels were increased at 12 months after surgery in both groups without significant difference according to the reconstruction type and diabetic improvement status except ghrelin. In gastric cancer surgery, RY reconstruction showed better and more durable diabetes control compared to BI during the first year after surgery. Gastric cancer surgery led to decreased ghrelin and leptin and increased PYY and GIP, which might have a role in improving insulin resistance and glucose homeostasis.

Seven Years of Mini-Gastric Bypass in Type II Diabetes Patients with a Body Mass Index <35 kg/m(2)

BACKGROUND

Mini-gastric bypass (MGB) is a safe, effective, and reversible procedure for patients with type II diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and morbid obesity. Less is known, however, about its long-term effects in patients with a body mass index (BMI) <35 kg/m(2).

METHODS

From February 2007 to February 2014, 1468 patients underwent MGB at our institution, including 983 with T2DM. Of these, 128 (82 women), of mean age 41.6 ± 10.2 years, had a BMI of 30-35 kg/m(2). Prospectively collected data were analyzed retrospectively. Factors assessed included disease duration, family history, medication use, remission, and biochemical indicators, including fasting plasma glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), serum insulin, and C-peptide concentrations. Remission of T2DM was defined as HbA1c <6.0 % without medication.

RESULTS

Prior to surgery, patients had a mean BMI of 33.4 ± 3.3 kg/m(2), mean waist circumference of 104.5 ± 8.2 cm, mean C-peptide concentration of 3.4 ± 1.2 ng/ml, and mean T2DM duration of 6.5 ± 3.1 years. Within 6 months of MGB, 95 % of these patients had attained HbA1c <7 %. Complete remission rates at 1, 2, and 7 years were 64, 66, and 53 %, respectively. Mean HbA1c decreased from 10.7 ± 1.5 % at baseline to 6.2 ± 0.5% at 1 year, 5.4 ± 1.2 % at 3 years, and 5.7 ± 1.8 % at 7 years. No deaths occurred, but two (1.6 %) patients experienced major complications.

CONCLUSIONS

MGB provides good, long-term control of T2DM in patients with class I obesity. Early intervention results in higher remission rates.

Metabolic Surgery in Korea: What to Consider before Surgery

Obesity is increasing globally and represents a significant global health problem because it predisposes towards various diseases, such as type 2 diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, degenerative joint disease, and certain types of cancer. Numerous studies have shown that bariatric surgery reduces body mass and ameliorates obesity-related complications, such as hypertension and hyperglycemia, suggesting that surgery is the most effective therapeutic option for severely obese and obese diabetic patients. Recent international guidelines recommend surgical treatment for diabetic patients with class III obesity (body mass index [BMI] >40 kg/m²), regardless of their level of glycemic control or the complexity of their glucose-lowering regimens, and for patients with class II obesity (BMI 35.0 to 39.9 kg/m²) and hyperglycemia that is poorly controlled despite appropriate lifestyle and pharmacological therapy. The most popular procedures are Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy, but new procedures with better outcomes have been reported. For optimal surgical outcome, comprehensive management including assessments of a medical condition, nutrition, mental health, and social support is needed before and after surgery. However, there is still a lack of understanding regarding metabolic surgery in Korea. Therefore, this article reviews indications for metabolic surgery in patients with a specific focus on the situation in Korea.

Metabolic Surgery for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Experience from Asia

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a current global health priority and Asia is the epicenter of this epidemic disease. Unlike in the west, where older population is most affected, the burden of diabetes in Asian countries is disproportionately high in young to middle-age adults. The incidence of diabetic nephropathy is alarmingly high in patients with early onset T2DM, especially in those with poor glycemic control. How to control this chronic and debilitating disease is currently a very important health issue in Asia. Bariatric surgery has proven successful in treating not just obesity but also T2DM in morbid obese patients (body mass index [BMI] >35 kg/m²). Gastrointestinal metabolic surgery recently has been proposed as a new treatment modality for obesity related T2DM for patients with BMI <35 kg/m². Many studies from Asia reported promising results of metabolic surgery to treat obese patients with T2DM which is not well controlled. It has been demonstrated that changes in gastrointestinal hormone secretion after gastrointestinal surgery would favor an early improvement of T2DM in Asians. New procedures have also been designed and proposed specifically for the treatment of diabetes in Asia. This article examines clinical trial data and accepted algorithms with a view toward elucidating the application of metabolic surgery for the treatment of T2DM in the Asia. We propose a systematic approach to surgical treatment, addressing current evidences, patient selection, procedure of choice, and timing and guideline for new procedures.

The Effect and Predictive Score of Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy on Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients with BMI < 30 kg/m(2)

BACKGROUND

Metabolic surgery is a novel therapy for mild obesity (BMI 30-35 Kg/m(2)) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. The ABCD score, which comprise age, BMI, C-peptide level, and duration of T2DM (years), was reported as useful in predicting the success of T2DM treatment using metabolic surgery. This study examines gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy as a salvage treatment for non-obese (BMI < 30 kg/m(2)) T2DM patients and evaluates the role of ABCD scores.

METHODS

From January 2007 to July 2013, 512 (71.2%) of 711 T2DM patients enrolled in a metabolic surgical program had at least 1-year follow-up were recruited. Clinical data and outcomes of 80 (15.6%) patients with BMI < 30 Kg/m(2) were compared with those of the other 432 (84.4%) patients with BMI ≥ 30 Kg/m(2). Complete remission was defined as HbA1c ≤ 6%, and partial remission was defined as HbA1c < 6.5%. A binary logistic regression was used to identify predictors of T2DM remission.

RESULTS

Mean age of the 80 non-obese T2DM patients was 47.7 ± 9.1 years, and mean HbA1c and disease duration were 9.1 ± 1.8% and 6.5 ± 5.1 years, respectively. Mean total body weight loss was 17.1 ± 7.4% at 1 year, and mean BMI decreased from 26.9 ± 2.2 to 22.7 ± 2.5 kg/m(2) at 1 year. Complete remission of T2DM was achieved in 25.0% of patients, and partial remission was achieved in 23.8%. The complete remission rate was significantly lower than the 49.5% found in patients with BMI 30-35 and 79.0% of patients with BMI > 35 Kg/m(2). In univariate analysis, non-obese patients who had T2DM remission after surgery were heavier and had a wider waist, higher C-peptide levels, shorter disease duration, more weight loss, and higher ABCD score than those without remission. The ABCD score remained the only independent predictor of success after multivariate logistical regression analyses (P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Metabolic surgery may be useful in achieving glycemic control of selected non-obese T2DM patients. The ABCD score is a simple multidimensional grading system that can predict the success of T2DM treatment.

CLINICAL COURSE OF DIABETIC RETINOPATHY IN KOREAN TYPE 2 DIABETES AFTER BARIATRIC SURGERY: A Pilot Study

PURPOSE

To assess the changes in diabetic retinopathy (DR) in Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) patients after bariatric surgery.

METHODS

Consecutive 20 patients with T2DM who underwent bariatric surgery and were followed for at least 12 months were enrolled. The case history was reviewed retrospectively, and laboratory data were assessed at baseline and every 3 months postoperatively. Two retinal specialists evaluated the severity of DR with dilated fundus examination preoperatively and postoperatively. Factors associated with DR progression were assessed.

RESULTS

During the follow-up period, 2 of 12 patients without DR and 2 of 3 patients with mild nonproliferative DR before surgery developed moderate nonproliferative DR. All five patients with moderate nonproliferative DR or worse preoperatively had progression requiring intervention. Preexisting DR (P = 0.005) and albuminuria (P = 0.01) were identified as associated with DR progression. Six patients (30%) entered remission of T2DM, but remission of T2DM could not halt the DR progression.

CONCLUSION

Diabetic retinopathy progression can occur in patients with or without before DR after bariatric surgery, regardless of remission of T2DM. All patients with T2DM should be examined regularly by an ophthalmologist postoperatively, and more carefully patients with previous DR or albuminuria.

Comparison of control fasting plasma glucose of exercise-only versus exercise-diet among a pre-diabetic population: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Exercise is considered a protective factor in the prevention of type 2 diabetes, although its role as a sole treatment for pre-diabetes remains unknown. The present meta-analysis compared the effect of exercise-only with exercise-diet interventions on plasma glucose levels among a pre-diabetic population.

SUBJECTS/METHODS

A literature search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases. The Cochrane Collaboration tool was used to assess the quality of each trial. Two reviewers independently performed quality assessment of all included articles. A random effects model was used to calculate the pooled effect.

RESULTS

A total of 4021 participants from 12 studies were included in this meta-analysis, 2045 of them were in the intervention group and 1976 were in the control group. Compared with the exercise-only interventions, the exercise-diet interventions showed a significant effect on decreasing fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels, with a weighted mean difference (WMD) =-0.22 mmol/l, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.25, -0.18 (Z=12.06, P<0.05). The subgroup effect of exercise-only interventions did not produce a statistically significant result (WMD=-0.09 mmol/l, 95% CI: -0.18, 0.00, Z=1.91, P>0.05). According to the intervention periods, the pooled effect in the ⩾2-year group was the highest, and its WMD (95% CI) was -0.24 mmol/l (-0.43,-0.05). The pooled effects were statistically significant among the elderly and those of American and European descent, with WMD (95% CI) being -0.19 mmol/l (95% CI: -0.22, -0.15), -0.17 mmol/l (-0.21,-0.12) and -0.22 mmol/l (-0.27, -0.17), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence from published trials indicates that exercise-diet interventions showed a significant effect on decreasing FPG levels.

Efficacy of Laparoscopic Mini Gastric Bypass for Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background. Controversies on the utility of laparoscopic mini gastric bypass (LMGB) in weight loss and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) control still exist. Methods. We conducted a comprehensive literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. Review Manager was used to perform the meta-analysis and the weighted mean difference (WMD) and/or odds ratio with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were used to evaluate the overall size effect. Results. The literature search identified 16 studies for systematic review and 15 articles for meta-analysis. Compared with LAGB, LSG, and LRYGB, LMGB showed significant weight loss [WMD, −6.58 (95% CI, −9.37, −3.79), P < 0.01 (LAGB); 2.86 (95% CI, 1.40, 5.83), P = 0.004 (LSG); 10.33 (95% CI, 4.30, 16.36), P < 0.01 (LRYGB)] and comparable/higher T2DM remission results [86.2% versus 55.6%, P = 0.06 (LAGB); 89.1% versus 76.3%, P = 0.004 (LAGB); 93.4% versus 77.6%, P = 0.006 (LAGB)]; LMGB also had shorter learning curve and less operation time than LRYGB [WMD, −35.2 (95% CI, −46.94, −23.46)]. Conclusions. LMGB appeared to be effective in weight loss and T2DM remission and noninferior to other bariatric surgeries. However, clinical utility of LMGB needs to be further validated by future prospective randomized controlled trials.

A decade of bariatric surgery. What have we learned? Outcome in 520 patients from a single institution

BACKGROUND

Today a variety of bariatric surgical procedures is available and, currently, it is difficult to identify the most effective option based on patient characteristics and comorbidities. Aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate the efficacy of four different techniques; Intragastric Balloon (IB), Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding (LAGB), Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) and Laparoscopic Mini Gastric Bypass (LMGB), performed in our unit along ten years.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Starting from January 2005, 520 patients, 206 men (39.6%) and 314 women (60.4%) were treated at our institution. Among patients candidate to bariatric surgery 145 underwent IB, 120 underwent LAGB, 175 underwent LSG and 80 underwent LMGB. Follow up rate was 93.1% for IB at 6 months; 74.1% and 48% for LAGB at 36 and 60 months respectively; 72.8% and 58.1% for LSG at 36 and 60 months respectively; and 84.2% for LMGB at 36 months.

RESULTS

The period 2005-2014 has been considered. Mortality was 1/520 patients (0.19%). The excess weight loss rate (EWL%) has been 32.8 for IB at six months, 53.7 for LAGB and 68.1 for LSG, at 60 months respectively and 79.5 for LMGB at 36 months. Early major postoperative complications requiring surgery were 0.6% for IB and 1.1% for LSG whereas late major postoperative complications were 1.2% for IB, 4.1% for LAGB and 0.5% for LSG. Diabetes resolution rate was 0 for LAGB, 76.9% for LSG and 80% for LMGB at 36 months.

CONCLUSIONS

If more invasive procedures as LSG or LMGB may entail higher operative and peroperative risks, conversely, in skilled hands their efficacy remains undisputed, especially in the long term, presenting a very low rate of major complications. In general, the efficacy of a bariatric surgery unit seems improved by the capability to offer both different primary procedures and re-do surgery.