Early Postoperative Outcomes of Primary Bariatric Surgery in Patients on Chronic Steroid or Immunosuppressive Therapy

Effects of the preoperative use and dosage of steroids on postoperative complications of gastric cancer surgery

PURPOSE

To investigate the effects of preoperative steroid administration, including dosage, on complications after gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

METHODS

We reviewed patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric and esophagogastric junctional adenocarcinoma between 2013 and 2019 at the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The University of Tokyo.

RESULTS

Among the total 764 patients eligible for inclusion in the study, 17 were on steroid medication preoperatively (SD group) and 747 were not (ND group). The hemoglobin, serum albumin levels, and respiratory functions were significantly lower in the SD group than in the ND group. The incidence of postoperative complications classified as Clavien-Dindo (C-D) ≥ 2 was significantly greater in the SD group than in the ND group (64.7% vs. 25.6%, p < 0.001). Intra-abdominal infection (35.2% vs. 9.6%, p < 0.001) and anastomotic leakage (11.8% vs. 2.1%, p < 0.001) occurred more frequently in the SD group than in the ND group. On multiple logistic regression analysis for C-D ≥ 3 postoperative complications, the odds ratio for oral steroid use ≥ 5 mg per day as prednisolone had the highest value, of 13.0 (95% confidence interval 2.46-76.2, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative oral steroid use was identified as an independent risk factor for postoperative complications after gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Furthermore, the complication rate appears to increase as the oral steroid dosage is increased.

Risks of chronic steroid or immunosuppressive therapy on total shoulder arthroplasty patients

Introduction

Patients on chronic corticosteroids/immunosuppressants (SI) undergoing orthopaedic surgery are at an increased risk for surgical complications and worse outcomes. However, whether or not chronic preoperative SI use increases the risk for 30-day complications in patients undergoing primary total shoulder arthroplasty (SA) has yet to be explored.

Methods

From 2006 to 2019, the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was used to identify all patients who underwent primary SA (anatomic TSA and reverse TSA). Patients were stratified into two cohorts: chronic preoperative SI users and those without use. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were utilized in this study.

Results

Of the 26,979 patients who underwent primary SA, 25,656 (95.1%) patients did not have SI usage whereas 1323 (4.9%) patients had chronic preoperative SI usage. Following adjustment on multivariate analyses, compared to the non-SI usage cohort, patients who used SI had an increased risk of urinary tract infections (UTIs) (OR 1.87; p = 0.009) and septic shock (OR 7.14; p = 0.002). There were no differences in mortality between the two cohorts (p = 0.058).

Discussion and Conclusion

Chronic pre-operative SI use is an independent risk factor for septic shock and UTIs following primary SA. Surgeons and patients should be aware of these risks to better inform patient counseling and surgical decision making.

Comparison of early post-operative complications in primary and revisional laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, gastric bypass, and duodenal switch MBSAQIP-reported cases from 2015 to 2019

BACKGROUND

Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is now the most performed bariatric surgery, though gastric bypass (GB) and duodenal switch (DS) remain common, especially as conversion/revision (C/R) procedures. This analysis compared early postoperative outcomes of primary and C/R laparoscopic SG to DS and GB; and primary procedures of each vs C/R counterparts.

METHODS

The Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) dataset was queried for SG, GB, and DS cases from 2015 to 2019. Multivariable logistic regression calculated crude and adjusted odds ratios for surgical site infection (SSI), reoperation, and readmission at 30 days in two initial comparisons: (1) primary SG vs DS or GB and (2) C/R SG vs DS or GB. A secondary analysis compared primary GS, GB, or DS with C/R counterparts. Models were adjusted for confounding demographics and comorbidities.

RESULTS

Of 755,968 primary cases, most were SG (72.8%), followed by GB (26.3%), then DS (0.9%). Compared to SG, GB and DS demonstrated higher odds of SSI (aOR 3.02 [2.84, 3.2]), readmission (aOR 1.97 [1.92, 2.03]), and reoperation (aOR 2.74 [2.62, 2.86]), respectively. Of 68,716 C/R cases, SG was most common (43.2%), followed by GB (37.5%), then DS (19.2%). C/R GB and DS demonstrated greater risk of SSI (aOR 2.28 [1.98, 2.62]), readmission (aOR 2.10 [1.94, 2.27]), and reoperation (aOR 2.3 [2.04, 2.59]) vs SG, respectively. C/R SG and DS demonstrated greater risk of SSI (OR 2.09 [1.66, 2.63]; 1.63 [1.24, 2.14), readmission (OR 1.13 [1.02, 1.26]), and reoperation (OR 1.27 [1.06, 1.52]; 1.58 [1.24, 2.0]), vs primary procedures. C/R DS demonstrated greater risk of SSI (OR 1.23 [1.66, 2.63]).

CONCLUSIONS

Early complications are comparable between GB and DS, and greater than SG. In C/R procedures, GB and DS demonstrate greater risk than SG. Overall, C/R procedures demonstrate greater risk of most, but not all, early postoperative complications.

Effect of metabolic surgery on immunosuppressive medication use in patients with rheumatic diseases

BACKGROUND

Obesity is an inflammatory condition associated with higher rheumatic disease (RD) incidence, increased disease activity, and functional impairment.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to assess whether metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) decreases immunosuppressant use in patients with RD.

SETTING

Bariatric surgery academic centers of excellence.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of MBS procedures in patients using immunosuppressants for RD between 2008 and 2020 at 2 academic institutions. Patient data were analyzed at 3-, 6-, 12-, and 24-month follow-up intervals. We examined paired differences in the number of preoperative medications relative to different postoperative follow-up periods using McNemar tests for the prednisone-only comparisons and paired t tests for all other comparisons.

RESULTS

We identified 53 patients with RD who underwent MBS (mean age = 53 years; mean follow-up = 19 months). Of these patients, 64% had Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, 30% sleeve gastrectomy, and 6% duodenal switch. Rheumatoid arthritis was the most common RD (42%), followed by psoriasis (19%) and lupus (11%). Mean percent total weight loss and change in body mass index were 31.3% and 15.9 kg/m², respectively, at 24-month follow-up. At 24 months, 10 patients (30%) stopped prednisone (P = .007), and 13 patients (33%) showed a reduction in immunosuppressant use (disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs or glucocorticoids) (P = .01). One patient started glucocorticoids postoperatively, and 2 patients had an increase in immunosuppressant use. At the last encounter, 5 patients were off immunosuppressants, and all medication classes, except biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, showed significant reductions.

CONCLUSION

There is significant decrease in the use of immunosuppressant agents after MBS in patients with RD. Further studies are needed to confirm the correlation.

Prescriptions for pain medication before and after bariatric surgery

BACKGROUND

Significant and sustained weight loss resulting from bariatric surgery have demonstrated clinical reduction in severe obesity-related pain. Subsequentially, post-surgical pain reduction may reduce pain medication use. However, clear evidence regarding use of prescribed pain medications before and after bariatric surgery is absent.

METHODS

Linking two state-wide databases, patients who underwent bariatric surgery between July 1, 2013 and December 31, 2015 were identified. Proportion tests were used to compare percent of patients with pain medication prescriptions 1 year before and 1 year after bariatric surgery. Logistic regression was used to identify baseline factors that were associated with pain medication use 1-year following surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 3535 bariatric surgical patients aged 18-64 years at surgery were identified. Of these patients, 1339 patients met the following study criteria: covered by private insurance; known pre-surgical BMI; and continuous enrollment with health plan(s) from 12-month pre-surgery to 13-month post-surgery. While comparison of average number of overall pain medication prescriptions before and after surgery did not change, from 3.46 to 3.32 prescriptions (p value = 0.26), opioid prescription use increased from 1.62 vs. 2.05 (p value < 0.01). Patients prescribed more types of pain medications before surgery were more likely to have prescribed pain medications after surgery. Patients prescribed benzodiazepines at baseline had higher odds being prescribed post-surgery corticosteroids (OR = 1.89, p value < 0.01), muscle relaxants (OR = 2.18, p value < 0.01), and opioids (OR = 3.06, p value =  < 0.01) compared to patients without pre-surgery--prescribed benzodiazepine.

CONCLUSION

While comparison of average number of overall pain medication prescriptions before and after bariatric surgery did not decrease, opioid prescription increased post-surgery. Further studies are needed to examine whether post-surgery opioids are prescribed in lieu of or in tandem with other pain medication prescriptions.

Defining Global Benchmarks in Elective Secondary Bariatric Surgery Comprising Conversional, Revisional, and Reversal Procedures

OBJECTIVE

To define "best possible" outcomes for secondary bariatric surgery (BS).

BACKGROUND

Management of poor response and of long-term complications after BS is complex and under-investigated. Indications and types of reoperations vary widely and postoperative complication rates are higher compared to primary BS.

METHODS

Out of 44,884 BS performed in 18 high-volume centers from 4 continents between 06/2013-05/2019, 5,349 (12%) secondary BS cases were identified. Twenty-one outcome benchmarks were established in low-risk patients, defined as the 75th percentile of the median outcome values of centers. Benchmark cases had no previous laparotomy, diabetes, sleep apnea, cardiopathy, renal insufficiency, inflammatory bowel disease, immunosuppression, thromboembolic events, BMI> 50 kg/m2 or age> 65 years.

RESULTS

The benchmark cohort included 3143 cases, mainly females (85%), aged 43.8 ± 10 years, 8.4 ± 5.3 years after primary BS, with a BMI 35.2 ± 7 kg/m2. Main indications were insufficient weight loss (43%) and gastro-esophageal reflux disease/dysphagia (25%). 90-days postoperatively, 14.6% of benchmark patients presented ≥1 complication, mortality was 0.06% (n = 2). Significantly higher morbidity was observed in non-benchmark cases (OR 1.37) and after conversional/reversal or revisional procedures with gastrointestinal suture/stapling (OR 1.84). Benchmark cutoffs for conversional BS were ≤4.5% re-intervention, ≤8.3% re-operation 90-days postoperatively. At 2-years (IQR 1-3) 15.6% of benchmark patients required a reoperation.

CONCLUSION

Secondary BS is safe, although postoperative morbidity exceeds the established benchmarks for primary BS. The excess morbidity is due to an increased risk of gastrointestinal leakage and higher need for intensive care. The considerable rate of tertiary BS warrants expertise and future research to optimize the management of non-success after BS.

Liver transplantation and bariatric surgery: a new surgical reality: a systematic review of the best time for bariatric surgery

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease has increased in parallel with the obesity. This situation represents a new reality for patients with an indication for liver transplant (LT) and bariatric surgery (BS). We undertook a systematic review of BS and LT using the terms 'liver transplant', 'obesity' and 'bariatric surgery'. The variables analyzed were number of patients, technique and timing of BS, surgical complications, follow-up and mortality. A total of 190 papers were identified and, 28 articles were discussed (6 papers with BS before a LT, 6 with both procedures simultaneously and 16 studies with BS after a LT). In the last 7 years, 22 of the 28 papers (78.6%) were published on this subject. A total of 144 patients had both procedures: 27 (18.8%) before, 42 (29.1%) simultaneously and 75 (52.1%) after. Sleeve gastrectomy was the most performed BS (121 cases-84%) followed by a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (20 cases-13.9%). The number of publications has increased substantially in recent years. The majority papers of BS after LT could be explained because of commodity of the flow of these patients. The best moment to perform BS in these patients has yet to be established.

Esophageal cancer after sleeve gastrectomy: a population-based comparative cohort study

BACKGROUND

Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is the most common bariatric surgery; however, this approach may induce gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Both obesity and GERD are independent risk factors for esophageal cancer, however the impact of SG on risk of esophageal cancer remains unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the risk of esophageal cancer after reflux-prone bariatric surgery.

SETTING

Population-level, provincial administrative healthcare database, Quebec, Canada.

METHODS

We identified a population-based cohort of all patients with obesity who underwent reflux-prone surgery (SG and duodenal switch [DS]) or reflux-protective Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) during 01/2006-12/2012 in Quebec, Canada. For every surgical patient, 2-3 nonsurgical controls with obesity matched for age, sex, and geography were also identified. Crude incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for esophageal cancer were calculated using person-time analysis. Hazard ratios (HRs) were obtained using multivariate cox regression.

RESULTS

A total of 4121 patients had reflux-prone procedures and 852 underwent RYGB. At a mean follow-up of 7.6 years, 8 cases of esophageal cancer were identified after bariatric surgery. Compared with RYGB, IRR for esophageal cancer in reflux-prone group was 1.45 (95%CI: .19-65.5) and HR = .83 (95%CI: .10-7.27). The crude incidence rate of esophageal cancer in the reflux-prone group was higher than that of nonsurgical controls (n = 12,159; IRR = 3.46, 95%CI: 1.00-12.5), but after adjustment the difference disappeared (HR = 2.47, 95%CI: .82-7.45).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term incidence of esophageal cancer after reflux-prone bariatric surgery is not greater than RYGB. While crude incidence of esophageal cancer after reflux-prone surgery is higher than in nonsurgical patients with obesity, such difference disappears after accounting for confounders. Given the low incidence of esophageal cancer and slow progression of dysplastic Barrett esophagus, studies with longer follow-up are needed.

Risk of peri-operative complications in children receiving preoperative steroids

BACKGROUND

Steroid use predisposes adult patients to increased perioperative complications including wound dehiscence and delayed wound healing. A similar large study investigating the perioperative impact of steroid use in pediatric patients has not been performed.

METHODS

The National Surgical Quality Improvement Project Pediatric Database was queried from 2012-2017 to identify patients who received steroid preoperatively. Patient demographics, comorbidities, surgical variables, and outcomes were compared between cohorts. Patients were propensity score matched and thirty-day adverse events were compared.

RESULTS

Of 425,251 pediatric surgery patients, 9716 (2.3%) received preoperative steroids. Pediatric patients treated with steroids were older and had more comorbidities. After propensity score matching, the steroid population had a significantly higher rate of adverse events, including prolonged hospital stay (15.3% vs. 9.1%, p < 0.001), seizure (0.9% vs. 0.4%, p < 0.001), readmission (14.4% vs. 9.2%, p < 0.001), and death (2.2% vs. 1.1%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative steroid use is independently associated with increased 30-day postoperative adverse events among pediatric patients. Given the significant impact of steroid use on surgical outcomes, the risks and benefits of steroid treatment in children receiving surgery should be carefully evaluated.

Metabolic syndrome and liver disease in the era of bariatric surgery: What you need to know!

Metabolic syndrome (MS) is defined as the constellation of obesity, insulin resistance, high serum triglycerides, low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and high blood pressure. It increasingly affects more and more people and progressively evolves into a serious issue with widespread healthcare, cost, and quality of life associated consequences. MS is associated with increased morbidity and mortality due to cardiovascular or chronic liver disease. Conservative treatment, which includes diet, exercise, and antidiabetic agents, is the mainstay of treatment, but depends on patient compliance to medical treatment and adherence to lifestyle modification recommendations. Bariatric surgery has recently emerged as an appropriate alternative treatment with promising long-term results. Sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass constitute the most commonly performed procedures and have been proven both cost-effective and safe with low complication rates. Liver transplantation is the only definitive treatment for end-stage liver disease and its utilization in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis has increased more than fivefold over the past 15 years. In this review, we summarize current state of evidence on the surgical treatment of MS.

Bariatric Surgery Outcomes in Patients with Previous Organ Transplant: Scoping Review and Analysis of the MBSAQIP

BACKGROUND

Obesity is a major risk factor for transplant. Laparoscopic bariatric surgery (LBS) offers transplant patient benefits including improved comorbidities, graft function, and longevity. We completed a scoping review and analyzed the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) to determine the risk-benefit profile of LBS after transplant. We also compared laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) to laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) following transplant.

METHODS

Univariate analysis determined between group differences with subgroup analysis comparing LSG versus LRYGB in transplant patients. Multivariable analysis assessed whether prior transplant was independently associated with major complications or mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 469 (0.1%) patients had previous transplant and had more comorbidities and more often underwent LSG. Operative time (93.9 min vs 83 min, p < 0.001) and length of stay were longer. Major complications were threefold higher in patients with a transplant history (9.6% vs 3.2%; p < 0.001. Previous transplant was the second greatest independent predictor for major complication (OR 2.14 [1.54-2.98], p = < 0.001) but was not predictive of death (OR 1.06 [0.14-8.13] p = 0.956). Amongst transplant patients, LRYGB demonstrated higher rates of leak (n = 1), VTE, AKI, unplanned intubation, and readmission.

CONCLUSIONS

The 30-day complication rate from LBS is three times higher amongst patients with a transplant. LSG is likely the best surgical approach. Despite risks, post-transplant patients incur important benefits from LBS. Surgeons must be aware of this risk-benefit profile when determining LBS candidacy.

Cardiovascular and metabolic disease in the liver transplant recipient

Liver transplantation has led to great improvements in long-term survival in patients with decompensated liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma. Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of non-graft-related deaths and has increased prevalence in liver allograft recipients. This is partly secondary to higher post-transplant rates of metabolic risk factors-notably obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes mellitus, which comprise metabolic syndrome. Post-transplantation metabolic syndrome is expected to be a growing factor in morbidity and mortality as transplant candidates trend older, the rates of metabolic risk factors in the general population increase, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis grows disproportionally as an indication for transplantation, and post-transplantation survival lengthens. This review discusses the incidence and contributory factors for post-transplant increases in metabolic disease, as well as the burden of cardiovascular disease in the liver allograft recipient. Patients with pre-transplant diabetes or obesity are at particularly high risk for post-transplant metabolic syndrome, and would likely benefit from closer surveillance and more aggressive medical management of risk factors. In metabolic disease resistant to initial medical therapies, tailoring of immunosuppressive regimens may further assist in minimizing long-term cardiovascular disease, although this must be done with caution to avoid worsening the risk of graft failure.

Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Perioperative Nutrition, Metabolic, and Nonsurgical Support of Patients Undergoing Bariatric Procedures - 2019 Update: Cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology, The Obesity Society, American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, Obesity Medicine Association, and American Society of Anesthesiologists

OBJECTIVE

The development of these updated clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) was commissioned by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE), The Obesity Society (TOS), American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS), Obesity Medicine Association (OMA), and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Boards of Directors in adherence with the AACE 2017 protocol for standardized production of CPGs, algorithms, and checklists.

METHODS

Each recommendation was evaluated and updated based on new evidence from 2013 to the present and subjective factors provided by experts.

RESULTS

New or updated topics in this CPG include: contextualization in an adiposity-based chronic disease complications-centric model, nuance-based and algorithm/checklist-assisted clinical decision-making about procedure selection, novel bariatric procedures, enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery protocols, and logistical concerns (including cost factors) in the current health care arena. There are 85 numbered recommendations that have updated supporting evidence, of which 61 are revised and 12 are new. Noting that there can be multiple recommendation statements within a single numbered recommendation, there are 31 (13%) Grade A, 42 (17%) Grade B, 72 (29%) Grade C, and 101 (41%) Grade D recommendations. There are 858 citations, of which 81 (9.4%) are evidence level (EL) 1 (highest), 562 (65.5%) are EL 2, 72 (8.4%) are EL 3, and 143 (16.7%) are EL 4 (lowest).

CONCLUSIONS

Bariatric procedures remain a safe and effective intervention for higher-risk patients with obesity. Clinical decision-making should be evidence based within the context of a chronic disease. A team approach to perioperative care is mandatory, with special attention to nutritional and metabolic issues.

Liver Transplantation for Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis: Pathophysiology of Recurrence and Clinical Challenges

Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis is the fastest-growing indication for the liver transplant and a leading cause of hepatocellular carcinoma among patients listed for liver transplantation in the USA. Post-transplant nonalcoholic hepatic steatosis and steatohepatitis are frequent complications of liver transplantation. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis poses a significant challenge in both pre- and post-transplant period due to its association with metabolic syndrome, coronary artery disease, chronic kidney disease, and obstructive sleep apnea. While optimal therapy is not yet available in the post-liver transplant setting, lifestyle interventions continue to remain as the mainstay of therapy for post-transplant nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Early recognition with protocol biopsies and noninvasive modalities, along with modification of known risk factors, are the most effective methods to curtail the progression of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in the absence of FDA-approved pharmacologic therapy.

Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutrition, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of patients undergoing bariatric procedures - 2019 update: cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology, The Obesity Society, American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery, Obesity Medicine Association, and American Society of Anesthesiologists

OBJECTIVE

The development of these updated clinical practice guidelines (CPG) was commissioned by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, The Obesity Society, the American Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, the Obesity Medicine Association, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists boards of directors in adherence to the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists 2017 protocol for standardized production of CPG, algorithms, and checklists.

METHODS

Each recommendation was evaluated and updated based on new evidence from 2013 to the present and subjective factors provided by experts.

RESULTS

New or updated topics in this CPG include contextualization in an adiposity-based, chronic disease complications-centric model, nuance-based, and algorithm/checklist-assisted clinical decision-making about procedure selection, novel bariatric procedures, enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery protocols, and logistical concerns (including cost factors) in the current healthcare arena. There are 85 numbered recommendations that have updated supporting evidence, of which 61 are revised and 12 are new. Noting that there can be multiple recommendation statements within a single numbered recommendation, there are 31 (13%) Grade A, 42 (17%) Grade B, 72 (29%) Grade C, and 101 (41%) Grade D recommendations. There are 858 citations, of which 81 (9.4%) are evidence level (EL) 1 (highest), 562 (65.5%) are EL 2, 72 (8.4%) are EL 3, and 143 (16.7%) are EL 4 (lowest).

CONCLUSIONS

Bariatric procedures remain a safe and effective intervention for higher-risk patients with obesity. Clinical decision-making should be evidence-based within the context of a chronic disease. A team approach to perioperative care is mandatory with special attention to nutritional and metabolic issues.

Obesity in the Liver Transplant Setting

The obesity epidemic has resulted in an increased prevalence of obesity in liver transplant (LT) candidates and in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) becoming the fastest growing indication for LT. LT teams will be dealing with obesity in the coming years, and it is necessary for them to recognize some key aspects surrounding the LT in obese patients. Obesity by itself should not be considered a contraindication for LT, but it should make LT teams pay special attention to cardiovascular risk assessment, in order to properly select candidates for LT. Obese patients may be at increased risk of perioperative respiratory and infectious complications, and it is necessary to establish preventive strategies. Data on patient and graft survival after LT are controversial and scarce, especially for long-term outcomes, but morbid obesity may adversely affect these outcomes, particularly in NAFLD. The backbone of obesity treatment should be diet and exercise, whilst being careful not to precipitate or worsen frailty and sarcopenia. Bariatric surgery is an alternative for treatment of obesity, and the ideal timing regarding LT is still unknown. Sleeve gastrectomy is probably the procedure that has the best evidence in LT because it offers a good balance between safety and efficacy.

Risk of Surgical Site Infection and Mortality Following Lumbar Fusion Surgery in Patients With Chronic Steroid Usage and Chronic Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infection

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective database analysis among Medicare beneficiaries OBJECTIVE.: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of chronic steroid use and chronic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection on rates of surgical site infection (SSI) and mortality in patients 65 years of age and older who were treated with lumbar spine fusion.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Systemic immunosuppression and infection focus elsewhere in the body are considered risk factors for SSI. Chronic steroid use and previous MRSA infection have been associated with an increased risk of SSI in some surgical procedures, but their impact on the risk of infection and mortality after lumbar fusion surgery has not been studied in detail.

METHODS

The PearlDiver insurance-based database (2005-2012) was queried to identify 360,005 patients over 65 years of age who had undergone lumbar spine fusion. Of these patients, those who had been taking oral glucocorticoids chronically and those with a history of chronic MRSA infection were identified. The rates of SSI and mortality in these two cohorts were compared with an age- and risk-factor matched control cohort and odds ratio (OR) was calculated.

RESULTS

Chronic oral steroid use was associated with a significantly increased risk of 1-year mortality [OR = 2.06, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.13-3.78, P = 0.018] and significantly increased risk of SSI at 90 days (OR = 1.74, 95% CI 1.33-1.92, P < 0.001) and 1 year (OR = 1.88, 95% CI 1.41-2.01, P < 0.001). Chronic MRSA infection was associated with a significantly increased risk of SSI at 90 days (OR = 6.99, 95% CI 5.61-9.91, P < 0.001) and 1 year (OR = 24.0, 95%CI 22.20-28.46, P < 0.001) but did not significantly impact mortality.

CONCLUSION

Patients over 65 years of age who are on chronic oral steroids or have a history of chronic MRSA infection are at a significantly increased risk of SSI following lumbar spine fusion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

[Bariatric surgery: Expectations and therapeutic goals-a contradiction?]

In the majority of patients with morbid obesity, metabolic/bariatric surgery leads to relevant and sustained weight loss and improves obesity-related comorbidities, quality of life and functionality. Moreover, the associated reduction of risk factors for cardiovascular events and cancerous diseases has been shown to improve life expectations. Due to its excellent antidiabetic effect, the currently valid national S3 guidelines now recommend metabolic/bariatric surgery in patients who have a body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m² with poorly controlled diabetes. The Edmonton staging system enables a multidimensional consideration of the severity grade of obesity for each individual patient independent of the BMI. Patients with relevant obesity-related metabolic comorbidities should be prioritized for treatment and if possible before the occurrence of end-organ damage that is at least in some cases irreversible and which also increases the perioperative risk. Therapeutic goals for each individual patient should be carefully defined preoperatively in order to mediate realistic expectations. Unrealistic expectations, such as "surgery solves my problems", "surgery makes me more beautiful", "surgery eliminates stigma", and "surgery guarantees success", are common in bariatric surgery patients. These unrealistic expectations can lead to frustration and to severe psychological decompensation and need to be addressed as early as possible by an interdisciplinary team. Redundancies, conclusive and empathic communication in the team improve therapy adherence, the expectations and therefore the overall outcome.

Individualized Metabolic Surgery Score: Procedure Selection Based on Diabetes Severity

OBJECTIVE

To construct and validate a scoring system for evidence-based selection of bariatric and metabolic surgery procedures according to severity of type 2 diabetes (T2DM).

BACKGROUND

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) account for >95% of bariatric procedures in United States in patients with T2DM. To date, there is no validated model to guide procedure selection based on long-term glucose control in patients with T2DM.

METHODS

A total of 659 patients with T2DM who underwent RYGB and SG at an academic center in the United States and had a minimum 5-year follow-up (2005-2011) were analyzed to generate the model. The validation dataset consisted of 241 patients from an academic center in Spain where similar criteria were applied.

RESULTS

At median postoperative follow-up of 7 years (range 5-12), diabetes remission (HbA1C <6.5% off medications) was observed in 49% after RYGB and 28% after SG (P < 0.001). Four independent predictors of long-term remission including preoperative duration of T2DM (P < 0.0001), preoperative number of diabetes medications (P < 0.0001), insulin use (P = 0.002), and glycemic control (HbA1C < 7%) (P = 0.002) were used to develop the Individualized Metabolic Surgery (IMS) score using a nomogram. Patients were then categorized into 3 stages of diabetes severity. In mild T2DM (IMS score ≤25), both procedures significantly improved T2DM. In severe T2DM (IMS score >95), when clinical features suggest limited functional β-cell reserve, both procedures had similarly low efficacy for diabetes remission. There was an intermediate group, however, in which RYGB was significantly more effective than SG, likely related to its more pronounced neurohormonal effects. Findings were externally validated and procedure recommendations for each severity stage were provided.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest reported cohort (n = 900) with long-term postoperative glycemic follow-up, which, for the first time, categorizes T2DM into 3 validated severity stages for evidence-based procedure selection.

Outcomes after bariatric surgery according to large databases: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The rapid development of technological tools to record data allows storage of enormous datasets, often termed "big data". In the USA, three large databases have been developed to store data regarding surgical outcomes: the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP), the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) National Inpatient Sample (NIS) and the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP). We aimed to evaluate the clinical impact of studies found in these databases concerning outcomes of bariatric surgery.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review using the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. Research carried out using the PubMed database identified 362 papers. All outcomes related to bariatric surgery were analysed.

RESULTS

Fifty-four studies, published between 2005 and February 2017, were included. These articles were divided into (1) outcomes related to surgical techniques (12 articles), (2) morbidity and mortality (12), (3) 30-day hospital readmission (10), (4) outcomes related to specific diseases (11), (5) training (2) and (6) socio-economic and ethnic observations in bariatric surgery (7). Forty-two papers were based on data from ACS-NSQIP, nine on data from NIS and three on data from MBSAQIP.

CONCLUSIONS

This review provides an overview of surgical management and outcomes of bariatric surgery in the USA. Large databases offer useful complementary information that could be considered external validation when strong evidence-based medicine data are lacking. They also allow us to evaluate infrequent situations for which randomized control trials are not feasible and add specific information that can complement the quality of surgical knowledge.

Liver Transplantation and Bariatric Surgery: Best Approach

Obesity has become increasingly prevalent, and the number of obese patients in need of liver transplant is expected to continue to increase. In addition, liver disease due to nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is expected to become the leading cause of liver transplantation in the near future. However, obesity remains a relative contraindication in liver transplant. New strategies in managing this patient population are clearly needed. To this end, the authors review the current literature on the efficacy of bariatric surgery in the setting of liver transplantation in obese patients.