Bariatric Surgery Outcomes in Patients with Severe Obesity Compared to Patients with Non-Severe Obesity at A New Institution in The United Arab Emirates

Background: Bariatric surgery is an effective treatment for weight loss, but a higher body mass index (BMI) may lead to higher postoperative complication rates. This study aims to compare perioperative and postoperative outcomes between UAE patients with severe obesity (SO) [BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2] and non-severe obesity (NSO) [BMI < 50 kg/m2] undergoing primary bariatric surgery. Methods: From September 2015 to July 2019, 542 patients, 94 SO (56.5 ± 6.2 kg/m2) and 448 NSO (41.8 ± 4.1 kg/m2), were retrospectively reviewed. Results: Patients with SO were younger (33.8 ± 13.4 vs. 37.0 ± 11.5 years, p = 0.02) but otherwise had similar demographic characteristics. Their rates of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (39.4% SO vs. 44.4% NSO, p = 0.37) and sleeve gastrectomy (60.6% vs. 55.6%, p = 0.37) were similar. There were no differences between perioperative complications (6.4% SO vs. 5.8% NSO, p = 0.83), major postoperative complications (5.3% vs. 3.5%, p = 0.42), readmissions (5.3% vs. 3.3%, p = 0.36), or reoperations (3.2% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.78). There were no mortalities. Their total body weight loss was comparable at 12 months (28.1 ± 10.2% vs. 29.0 ± 7.7%, p = 0.58). Conclusions: Although a higher BMI may pose operative challenges, UAE patients with SO do not have worsened outcomes in bariatric surgery, demonstrating similarly low morbidity to patients with NSO, and similar rates of improvement in their BMI.

Harnessing artificial intelligence in bariatric surgery: comparative analysis of ChatGPT-4, Bing, and Bard in generating clinician-level bariatric surgery recommendations

BACKGROUND

The formulation of clinical recommendations pertaining to bariatric surgery is essential in guiding healthcare professionals. However, the extensive and continuously evolving body of literature in bariatric surgery presents considerable challenge for staying abreast of latest developments and efficient information acquisition. Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to streamline access to the salient points of clinical recommendations in bariatric surgery.

OBJECTIVES

The study aims to appraise the quality and readability of AI-chat-generated answers to frequently asked clinical inquiries in the field of bariatric and metabolic surgery.

SETTING

Remote.

METHODS

Question prompts inputted into AI large language models (LLMs) and were created based on pre-existing clinical practice guidelines regarding bariatric and metabolic surgery. The prompts were queried into 3 LLMs: OpenAI ChatGPT-4, Microsoft Bing, and Google Bard. The responses from each LLM were entered into a spreadsheet for randomized and blinded duplicate review. Accredited bariatric surgeons in North America independently assessed appropriateness of each recommendation using a 5-point Likert scale. Scores of 4 and 5 were deemed appropriate, while scores of 1-3 indicated lack of appropriateness. A Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) score was calculated to assess the readability of responses generated by each LLMs.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference between the 3 LLMs in their 5-point Likert scores, with mean values of 4.46 (SD .82), 3.89 (.80), and 3.11 (.72) for ChatGPT-4, Bard, and Bing (P < .001). There was a significant difference between the 3 LLMs in the proportion of appropriate answers, with ChatGPT-4 at 85.7%, Bard at 74.3%, and Bing at 25.7% (P < .001). The mean FRE scores for ChatGPT-4, Bard, and Bing, were 21.68 (SD 2.78), 42.89 (4.03), and 14.64 (5.09), respectively, with higher scores representing easier readability.

CONCLUSIONS

LLM-based AI chat models can effectively generate appropriate responses to clinical questions related to bariatric surgery, though the performance of different models can vary greatly. Therefore, caution should be taken when interpreting clinical information provided by LLMs, and clinician oversight is necessary to ensure accuracy. Future investigation is warranted to explore how LLMs might enhance healthcare provision and clinical decision-making in bariatric surgery.

The Effects of Post-Surgical Pregnancy on Weight Loss Trajectories after Bariatric Surgery: Are Initial Weight and Age Prognostic Factors?

Introduction: A substantial percentage of patients undergoing bariatric surgery are of childbearing age. Pregnancy outcomes after bariatric surgery are known. However, there are limited data on the impact of pregnancy on weight loss after surgery. Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the effects of pregnancy on post-bariatric surgery weight loss trajectories (WLTs) and to determine the association with age and initial weight. Methods: All who had primary bariatric surgeries (Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or sleeve) between September 2015 and July 2020 were classified into two groups: post-surgery gravid (GG) and post-surgery non-gravid (NG). WLTs were examined using a random intercept mixed-effects model with repeated measures nested within patients. The post-surgery/pre-gravid time phase (PoPG) was modelled using a third-degree polynomial. For GG, two third-degree spline functions modelled the post-surgery while gravid (PoWG) and post-partum (PoPP) time phases. Age and initial weight were used to control for pre-existing differences during PoPG. Weight differences at 6 months PoPP were examined by applying general linear hypothesis testing to the mixed-model results. Results: A total of 508 patients were included, 20 in GG and 488 in NG. The mean age at surgery was 33 years in GG and 37 years in NG. The mean initial BMI was 47 kg/m2 and 43 kg/m2, respectively. During PoPG, adjusted average weight in both groups follows the path across time. For GG, weight decreases and then increases during PoWG. For GG during PoPP, weight immediately decreases after delivery and then increases over time to levels similar to NG. Weight differences at 6 months PoPP for GG and NG were not statistically different. Older age was associated with reduced weight loss during PoPG by Baseline Age, while higher initial weight was associated with increased weight loss during PoPG by Baseline Weight. In both instances, these effects attenuate over time. Conclusions: This model indicates that pregnancy following bariatric surgery affects WLT during PoWG and PoPP, and no difference in weight is expected after 6 months post-gravid. Age and initial weight could be considered prognostic factors during PoPG. Patients wishing to conceive should undergo preconception counselling and be advised to avoid pregnancy during the period of rapid weight loss. They also should be informed that WLT may vary during pregnancy and early post-partum.

Safety of limb lengthening after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: an analysis of the MBSAQIP database

BACKGROUND

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) effectively treats severe obesity, but some patients may require revisional surgery like limb lengthening (LL) for postoperative weight gain.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to compare 30-day serious complications and mortality rates between LL and primary RYGB, given limited safety data on LL.

METHODS

Patients who underwent LL and RYGB were identified from the 2020 and 2021 MBSAQIP databases, the only years in which LL data were available. Baseline characteristics and 30-day rates of serious complications and mortality were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 86,990 patients underwent RYGB and 455 underwent LL. Patients undergoing RYGB were younger (44.4 versus 49.8 yr, P < .001), had a higher body mass index (BMI) (45.5 versus 41.8 kg/m2, P < .001) and higher rates of comorbidities including diabetes (30.0 versus 13.6%, P < .001). RYGB and LL had similar operative duration (125.3 versus 123.2 min, P = .5). There were no statistical differences between cohorts for length of stay (LOS) (1.6 RYGB versus 1.6 LL d, P = .6). After LL, there were higher 30-day rates of reoperation (3.3 versus 1.9%, P = .03) and deep surgical site infections (1.3 versus .5%, P = .03) compared to RYGB. There were no differences in overall serious complications (5.1 LL versus 5.0% RYGB, P = 1.0) and mortality (.2 LL versus .1% RYGB, P = .5). Multivariable logistic regression adjustment found that previous venous thromboembolism was associated with serious complications after LL.

CONCLUSIONS

When compared to primary RYGB, LL has a favorable safety profile with similar 30-day rates of serious complications and mortality.

Third time's a charm: band to sleeve to bypass

BACKGROUND

Adjustable gastric bands (AGB) are frequently converted to sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) due to weight recurrence or band complications. Such conversions carry a higher-risk than primary procedures. Some patients undergo two conversions-from AGB to SG, and subsequently from SG to RYGB. This presents a unique situation with limited literature on indications and complication rates associated with these double conversions.

METHODS

We examined the 2020-2021 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) Participant Use File to evaluate conversions from AGB to SG and then to RYGB. Patient and operative characteristics, along with outcomes, were evaluated. Descriptive statistics were applied.

RESULTS

We identified 276 patients who underwent a conversion from AGB to SG and then to RYGB. The primary reason for the second conversion (SG to RYGB) was gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) at 55.1%, followed by inadequate weight loss or weight regain (IWL/WR) at 36.9%. The remaining reasons included dysphagia, nausea, vomiting, or others. Patients converted for IWL/WR demonstrated a higher baseline body mass index and prevalence of sleep apnea compared to other cohorts (both p < 0.001). Meanwhile, patients in the "other reasons" group had the highest rate of open surgical approaches (9.1%) and concurrent lysis of adhesions (p = 0.001 and p = 0.022), with correspondingly higher rates of anastomotic leak, reoperations, serious complications, and mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing double conversions (AGB to SG to RYGB) do so primarily for GERD or IWL/WR. Further research is required to better define the optimal primary operation for each patient, aiming to reduce the necessity for multiple conversions.

Hiatal hernia repair after previous laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

BACKGROUND

Symptomatic hiatal hernia (HH) with pouch migration after previous laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is an uncommon complication, with limited extant evidence for the utility of surgical repair.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the presentation and resolution of symptoms in patients with HH repair after previous RYGB.

SETTING

Multicenter University Hospital.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted from 2010 to 2022. Patients with prior RYGB who were undergoing subsequent isolated HH repair were included. Patients undergoing incidental HH repair during concomitant revisional bariatric surgery were excluded. Baseline characteristics and surgical outcomes were evaluated and presented as medians (25th-75th percentile).

RESULTS

Forty-four patients met the inclusion criteria. The time from RYGB to HH repair was 59 months (39-88). Body mass index at HH repair was 31 kg/m2 (27-39). The most common presenting symptoms of hernia were dysphagia (52%), gastric reflux (39%), and abdominal pain (36%). All HH repairs were completed with a minimally invasive approach (98% laparoscopic, 2% robotic). Nonabsorbable suture was used in 98% of patients, with bioabsorbable mesh in 30%. At a median 28-day (12-117) follow-up, 70% of patients reported full symptom resolution and 23% partial resolution. At follow-up, 2 patients had radiologic HH recurrence, with 1 requiring reoperation.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest series of isolated HH repair for symptomatic pouch migration after previous RYGB. Common presenting symptoms are dysphagia and reflux, and surgical repair yields a high rate of symptom resolution in the short term. Longer follow-up is needed to evaluate the durability of this intervention.

Primary single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) versus sleeve gastrectomy to SADI conversions: a comparison study of prevalence and safety

BACKGROUND

Conversion from sleeve gastrectomy (SG) to single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass (SADI) is becoming increasingly common, but data regarding safety is of these conversions is scarce. As such, the objective of this study was to compare the 30-day rate of serious complications and mortality of primary SADI (p-SADI-S) with SG to SADI (SG-SADI) conversions.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study analyzed the MBSAQIP database. Patients undergoing p-SADI-S and SG-SADI were included. Data collection was limited to 2020 and 2021. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed between groups to determine if SG-SADI was an independent predictor of 30-day serious complications or mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 783 patients were included in this study, 488 (62.3%) underwent p-SADI-S and 295 (37.6%) underwent SG-SADI. The mean body mass index (BMI) at the time of surgery was lower in the SG-SADI cohort (45.1 vs 51.4 kg/m2, p < 0.001). Indications for revision in the SG-SADI cohort included weight recurrence (50.8%), inadequate weight loss (41.0%), other (3.0%), GERD (2.7%), and persistent comorbidities (2.5%). SG-SADI had longer operative times (156.7 vs 142.1 min, p < 0.001) and was not associated with a higher rate of serious complications (5.7 vs 6.9%, p = 0.508) compared to p-SADI-S. p-SADI-S was associated with a higher rate of pneumonia (1.2 vs 0.0%, p < 0.001), and SG-SADI was not correlated with higher rates of reoperation (3.0 vs 3.2%, p = 0.861), readmission (5.4 vs 5.5%, p = 0.948) and death (0.0 vs 0.2%, p = 0.437). On multivariable analysis, SG-SADI was not independently predictive of serious complications (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.52, p = 0.514) when adjusting for age, sex, BMI, comorbidities, and operative time.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of SG-SADI is high, representing 37.6% of SADI-S procedures. Conversion from sleeve to SADI, is safe, and as opposed to other studies of revisional bariatric surgery, has similar 30-day complication rates to primary SADI-S.

Revisional Procedures after Sleeve Gastrectomy for Weight Recurrence or Inadequate Weight Loss: An Analysis of the MBSAQIP Database

INTRODUCTION

The safety of conversional bariatric procedures after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) for weight recurrence (WR) or inadequate weight loss (IWL) is debated due to limited evidence. Conversion options include Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass (SADI), and biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS). We aimed to compare serious complications and mortality rates between these procedures within 30 days.

METHODS

Using the 2020 and 2021 MBSAQIP databases, we identified patients who underwent a conversion from SG to RYGB, SADI, or BPD-DS. We performed a multivariable logistic regression to assess predictors of 30-day complications and mortality.

RESULTS

Among 7388 patients (77.6% RYGB, 8.7% SADI, 13.7% BPD-DS), those undergoing SADI and BPD-DS had higher preoperative body mass index. Conversion reasons included WR (63.0%) and IWL (37.0%). SADI and BPD-DS patients had longer operative times (p < 0.001) and higher leak rates (p = 0.001). Serious complications, reoperations, readmissions, and 30-day mortality were similar across groups. Conversion procedure type was not an independent predictor of complications.

CONCLUSION

RYGB was the most performed conversional procedure after SG. The study indicated a similar safety profile for revisional RYGB, SADI, and BPD-DS, with comparable 30-day complications and mortality rates. However, SADI and BPD-DS patients had longer operative time and higher leak rates.

One- versus two-stage conversions of adjustable gastric bands: an analysis of the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic adjustable gastric bands (AGB) are converted at high rates to secondary bariatric procedures. The available literature on the safety of converting in 1- versus 2-stage processes has not included large databases.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety of a 1- versus 2-stage conversion of AGB.

SETTING

Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP), United States.

METHODS

The MBSAQIP database for the years 2020 and 2021 was evaluated. One-stage AGB conversions were identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes and database variables. Multivariable analysis was performed to determine whether 1- or 2-stage conversions were associated with 30-day serious complications.

RESULTS

There were 12,085 patients who underwent conversion from previous AGB to sleeve gastrectomy (SG) (63.0%) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) (37.0%), of whom 41.0% underwent conversion in 1 stage and 59.0% in 2 stages. Patients who underwent 2-stage conversions had higher body mass indexes. Rates of serious complications were higher for patients undergoing RYGB compared with SG (5.2% versus 3.3%, P < .001) but were similar between 1-stage and 2-stage conversions in both cohorts. In both cohorts, there were similar rates of anastomotic leaks, postoperative bleeding, reoperation, and readmissions. Mortality was rare and similar between conversion groups.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no difference in outcomes or complications in 30 days between 1- and 2-stage conversions of AGB to RYGB or SG. Conversions to RYGB have higher complication and mortality rates than to SG, but there was no statistically significant difference between staged procedures. One- and 2-stage conversions from AGB are equivalent in safety.

Conversion of Sleeve Gastrectomy to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Indications, Prevalence, and Safety

BACKGROUND

Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) frequently requires conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) due to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) or weight recurrence. Current evidence evaluating the safety of conversion from SG to RYGB and its indications is limited to single centers.

METHODS

The objective was to determine the rate of serious complications and mortality of conversion of SG to RYGB (SG-RYGB) compared to primary RYGB (P-RYGB). This was a retrospective analysis of the MBSAQIP database which includes 30-day outcomes. Individuals undergoing P-RYGB or SG-RYGB were included. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine if revisional surgery was an independent predictor of serious complications or mortality.

RESULTS

In 2020 and 2021, 84,543 (86.3%) patients underwent P-RYGB and 13,432 (13.7%) underwent SG-RYGB. SG-RYGB cohort had lower body mass index, lower rates of diabetes and hypertension, and higher rates of GERD. GERD was the most common indication for revision (55.3%) followed by weight regain (24.4%) and inadequate weight loss (12.7%). SG-RYGB had longer operative times (145 vs. 125 min, p < 0.001) and a higher rate of serious complications (7.2 vs. 5.0%, p < 0.001). This included higher rates of anastomotic leak (0.5 vs. 0.4%, p = 0.002), bleeding (2.0 vs. 1.6%, p < 0.001), and reoperation (3.0 vs. 1.9%, p < 0.001) but not death (0.1 vs. 0.1%, p = 0.385). On multivariable analysis, SG-RYGB was independently predictive of serious complications (OR 1.21, 95%CI 1.12 to 1.32, p < 0.001) but not mortality (p = 0.316).

CONCLUSIONS

While SG-RYGB is safe with a low complication rate, SG-RYGB was associated with a higher rate of serious complications compared to P-RYGB.

Bariatric endoscopy: from managing complications to primary metabolic procedures

Obesity is a worldwide epidemic and is the second leading cause of preventable death. The approach to treating obesity involves a multidisciplinary approach including lifestyle interventions, pharmacological therapies, and bariatric surgery. Endoscopic interventions are emerging as important tools in the treatment of obesity with primary and revisional bariatric endoscopic therapies. These include intragastric balloons, aspiration therapy, suturing and plication, duodenal-jejunal bypass liners, endoscopic duodenal mucosal resurfacing, and incisionless magnetic anastomosis systems. Endoscopic interventions have also demonstrated efficacy in treating complications of bariatric surgery. Approaches include stenting, endoscopic internal drainage, and endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure. This review aimed to discuss the current endoscopic procedures used as primary and revisional bariatric therapy including those used for managing bariatric surgical complications.

Management of choledocholithiasis after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a systematic review and pooled proportion meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Several therapeutic modalities have been proposed for the management of choledocholithiasis (CDL) following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), yet debate exists regarding the optimal management. The purpose of our study was to review the current literature to compare the efficacy of various techniques in the management of CDL post-RYGB.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of multiple databases was conducted. Studies reporting on the management of CDL in patients post-RYGB and including at least 5 patients were eligible for inclusion. The primary outcome was successful stone clearance. Secondary outcomes included procedure duration, length of hospital stay, and adverse events.

RESULTS

Of 3259 identified studies, 53 studies involving 857 patients were included in the final analysis. The mean age was 54.4 years (SD 7.05), 78.8% were female (SD 13.6%), and the average BMI was 30.8 kg/m2 (SD 6.85). Procedures described included laparoscopy-assisted ERCP (LAERCP), balloon-assisted enteroscopy (BAE), ultrasound-directed transgastric ERCP (EDGE), laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE), EUS-guided intra-hepatic puncture with antegrade clearance (EGHAC), percutaneous trans-hepatic biliary drainage (PTHBD), and rendezvous guidewire-associated (RGA) ERCP. High rates of successful stone clearance were observed with LAERCP (1.00; 95% CI 0.99-1.00; p = 0.47), EDGE (0.97; 95% CI 0.9-1.00; p = 0.54), IGS ERCP (1.00; 95% CI 0.87-1.00), PTHBD (1.0; 95% CI 0.96-1.00), and LCBDE (0.99; 95% CI 0.93-1.00, p < 0.001). Lower rates of stone clearance were observed with BAE (61.5%; 95%CI 44.3-76.3, p = 0.188) and EGHAC (74.0%; 95% CI 42.9-91.5, p = 0.124). Relative to EDGE, LAERCP had a longer procedure duration (133.1 vs. 67.4 min) but lower complication rates (12.8% vs. 24.3%).

CONCLUSION

LAERCP and EDGE had high rates of success in the management of CDL post-RYGB. LAERCP had fewer complications but was associated with longer procedure times. BAE had lower success rates than both LAERCP and EDGE.

The Effect of Covid-19 Pandemic on Current and Future Endoscopic Personal Protective Equipment Practices: A National Survey of 77 Endoscopists

Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic has raised awareness about the importance of personal protective equipment (PPE). We aimed to study and compare PPE practices among Canadian endoscopists before and after the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

A 74-item questionnaire was emailed from June 2020 to September 2020 to practicing endoscopists in Canada. Survey questions collected basic demographics and differences between PPE practices pre- and post-COVID-19. PPE practices were categorized into four endoscopic procedure types including upper or lower endoscopy and diagnostic or interventional. Outcomes for specific procedures were reported as rates, with ranges shown when evaluating all procedure types together.

Results

A total of 77 respondents completed the survey with the majority of respondents aged 40 to 49 (44%) and identifying as Gastroenterologists (70%). Gender was evenly split (49% females versus 51% males). In the pre-pandemic era, the majority of endoscopists wore gowns (91 to 94%) and all endoscopists wore gloves (100%). However, the majority of endoscopists did not wear surgical masks (21 to 31%), face shields (13 to 34%), eye protection (13 to 21%), hair protection (11 to 13%), or N95 respirators (2 to 3%). In the post-pandemic era, more surgeons plan on wearing face shields (33 to 47%, P = 0.001 to 0.045), goggles (38.5 to 58.7%, P < 0.001), hair protection (33 to 36%, P = 0.011 to 0.024), and a trend suggests more surgeons will wear surgical masks (51 to 61%, P = 0.163 to 0.333). More endoscopists also plan on wearing N95 respirators during lower endoscopy (6 to 7%, P < 0.005).

Conclusion

The COVID-19 pandemic has changed the attitudes of many endoscopists regarding future PPE use in routine endoscopy. Ongoing studies are needed to inform new post-pandemic PPE consensus guidelines.

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy induce substantial and persistent changes in microbial communities and metabolic pathways

Bariatric surgery induces significant microbial and metabolomic changes, however, links between microbial and metabolic pathways have not been fully elucidated. The objective of this study was to conduct a comprehensive investigation of the microbial, metabolomic, and inflammatory changes that occur following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG). A prospective clinical trial was conducted with participants undergoing RYGB, SG, and non-operative controls (CTRL). Clinical parameters, blood samples, and fecal samples were collected pre-intervention and at 3 and 9 months. A multi-omics approach was used to perform integrated microbial-metabolomic analysis to identify functional pathways in which weight loss and metabolic changes occur after surgery. RYGB led to profound microbial changes over time that included reductions in alpha-diversity, increased Proteobacteria and Verrucomicrobiota, decreased Firmicutes, and numerous changes at the genera level. These changes were associated with a reduction in inflammation and significant weight loss. A reduction in Romboutsia genera correlated strongly with weight loss and integrated microbial-metabolomic analysis revealed the importance of Romboutsia. Its obliteration correlated with improved weight loss and insulin resistance, possibly through decreases in glycerophospholipids. In contrast, SG was associated with no changes in alpha-diversity, and only a small number of changes in microbial genera. A cluster of Firmicutes genera including Butyriciccocus, Eubacterium ventriosum, and Monoglobus was decreased, which correlated with decreased weight, insulin resistance, and systemic inflammation. This work represents comprehensive analyses of microbial-metabolomic changes that occur following bariatric surgery and identifies several pathways that are associated with beneficial metabolic effects of surgery.

Ileal microbial shifts after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass orchestrate changes in glucose metabolism through modulation of bile acids and L-cell adaptation

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB)-induced glycemic improvement is associated with increases in glucagon-like-peptide-1 (GLP-1) secreted from ileal L-cells. We analyzed changes in ileal bile acids and ileal microbial composition in diet-induced-obesity rats after RYGB or sham surgery to elucidate the early and late effects on L-cells and glucose homeostasis. In early cohorts, there were no significant changes in L-cell density, GLP-1 or glucose tolerance. In late cohorts, RYGB demonstrated less weight regain, improved glucose tolerance, increased L-cell density, and increased villi height. No difference in the expression of GLP-1 genes was observed. There were lower concentrations of ileal bile acids in the late RYGB cohort. Microbial analysis demonstrated decreased alpha diversity in early RYGB cohorts which normalized in the late group. The early RYGB cohorts had higher abundances of Escherichia-Shigella but lower abundances of Lactobacillus, Adlercreutzia, and Proteus while the late cohorts demonstrated higher abundances of Escherichia-Shigella and lower abundances of Lactobacillus. Shifts in Lactobacillus and Escherichia-Shigella correlated with decreases in multiple conjugated bile acids. In conclusion, RYGB caused a late and substantial increase in L-cell quantity with associated changes in bile acids which correlated to shifts in Escherichia-Shigella and Lactobacillus. This proliferation of L-cells contributed to improved glucose homeostasis.

30-day Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) after elective bariatric surgery: the development and validation of the Bari-MACE clinical predictive tool

BACKGROUND

Major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) after bariatric surgery are poorly understood yet are thought to be associated with significant morbidity and mortality.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the prevalence and clinical impact of short-term, 30-day MACE and to develop a pragmatic clinical predictive MACE scoring tool.

SETTING

This retrospective study was conducted using all the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP)-accredited center data from 2015 to 2019.

METHODS

Primary Roux-en-Y and sleeve gastrectomy procedures were included, and prior revisional surgeries and emergency surgeries were excluded. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was used to examine the risk factors associated with 30-day MACE. Using forward regression, a Bari-MACE clinical prediction model was generated.

RESULTS

A total of 750,498 patients were included in our analysis of which 959 (.1%) experienced a MACE. MACE patients were older (54.0 ± 11.5 yr versus 44.4 ± 12.0 yr, P < .0001), and comprised a higher proportion of males (36.3% versus 20.4%, P < .0001) and patients of White racial status (74.0% versus 71.6%, P < .0001). The MACE cohort also had a higher body mass index (46.6 ± 9.7 kg/m² versus 45.2 ± 7.8 kg/m², P < .0001), higher rates of sleep apnea (56.8% versus 38.2%, P < .0001), and a higher proportion of insulin-dependent diabetes (26.1% versus 8.4%, P < .0001) than non-MACE patients. Derivation of our clinical predictive Bari-MACE scoring model revealed 12 variables associated with development of MACE with a specificity of 97.8% using a 55-point threshold.

CONCLUSION

Thirty-day major adverse cardiac events after elective bariatric surgery are rare, occurring in approximately .1% of all patients, but are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Using the MBSAQIP, we developed a Bari-MACE clinical predictive tool to risk-stratify patients with the aim to better guide perioperative care and foster improved surgical outcomes.

Gastric ischemic conditioning prior to esophagectomy reduces anastomotic leaks and strictures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Gastric ischemic conditioning (GIC) is a strategy to promote neovascularization of the gastric conduit to reduce the risk of anastomotic complications following esophagectomy. Despite a number of studies and reviews published on the concept of ischemic conditioning, there remains no clear consensus regarding its utility. We performed an updated systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the impact of GIC, particularly on anastomotic leaks, conduit ischemia, and strictures.

METHODS

A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library was performed on February 5th, 2020 by a university librarian after selection of key search terms with the research team. Inclusion criteria included human participants undergoing esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction, age ≥ 18, N ≥ 5, and GIC performed prior to esophagectomy. Our primary outcome of interest was anastomotic leaks. Our secondary outcome was gastric conduit ischemia, anastomotic strictures, and overall survival. Meta-analysis was performed with RevMan 5.4.1 using a Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effects model.

RESULTS

A total of 1712 preliminary studies were identified and 23 studies included for final review. GIC was performed in 1178 (53.5%) patients. Meta-analysis revealed reduced odds of anastomotic leaks (OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.46-0.97; I² = 5%; p = 0.03) and anastomotic strictures (OR 0.48; 95% CI 0.29-0.80; I² = 65%; p = 0.005). Meta-analysis revealed no difference in odds of conduit ischemia (OR 0.40; 95% CI 0.13-1.23; I² = 0%; p = 0.11) and no difference in odds of overall survival (OR 0.54; 95% CI 0.29-1.02; I² = 22%; p = 0.06).

CONCLUSION

GIC is associated with reduced odds of anastomotic leaks and anastomotic strictures and may decrease morbidity in patients undergoing esophagectomy. Further prospective randomized trials are needed to better identify the optimal patient population, timing, and techniques used to best achieve GIC.

A Protocol for Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in Rats using Linear Staplers

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is commonly performed for the treatment of severe obesity and type 2 diabetes. However, the mechanism of weight loss and metabolic changes are not well understood. Multiple factors are thought to play a role, including reduced caloric intake, decreased nutrient absorption, increased satiety, the release of satiety-promoting hormones, shifts in bile acid metabolism, and alterations in the gut microbiota. The rat RYGB model presents an ideal framework to study these mechanisms. Prior work on mouse models have had high mortality rates, ranging from 17 to 52%, limiting their adoption. Rat models demonstrate more physiologic reserve to surgical stimulus and are technically easier to adopt as they allow for the use of surgical staplers. One challenge with surgical staplers, however, is that they often leave a large gastric pouch which is not representative of RYGB in humans. In this protocol, we present a RYGB protocol in rats that result in a small gastric pouch using surgical staplers. Utilizing two stapler fires which remove the forestomach of the rat, we obtain a smaller gastric pouch similar to that following a typical human RYGB. Surgical stapling also results in better hemostasis than sharp division. Additionally, the forestomach of the rat does not contain any glands and its removal should not alter the physiology of RYGB. Weight loss and metabolic changes in the RYGB cohort were significant compared to the sham cohort, with significantly lower glucose tolerance at 14 weeks. Furthermore, this protocol has an excellent survival of 88.9% after RYGB. The skills described in this protocol can be acquired without previous microsurgical experience. Once mastered, this procedure will provide a reproducible tool for studying the mechanisms and effects of RYGB.

Preoperative weight loss is linked to improved mortality and leaks following elective bariatric surgery: an analysis of 548,597 patients from 2015-2018

BACKGROUND

The effects of preoperative weight loss on bariatric surgery outcomes are still unclear, despite the practice being adopted by bariatric centers worldwide. Ongoing studies are needed for routine adoption of this practice given the multiple issues patients face with following difficult preoperative weight loss protocols.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to characterize the prevalence of preoperative weight loss and evaluate its impact on outcomes following elective bariatric surgery.

SETTING

This retrospective study was conducted using the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) data registry from 2015-2018.

METHODS

All primary Roux-en-Y (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) procedures were included, whereas prior revisional surgeries and emergency surgeries were excluded. Cases were then divided into preoperative weight loss (PWL) and control cohorts. PWL was defined categorically if the highest 30-day preoperative weight was greater than the closest recorded weight before surgery. Primary outcomes included identifying the impact of PWL on postoperative complications. Multivariable logistic regression modelling was used to examine the influence of PWL on serious complications and mortality after adjusting for patient co-morbidities and procedure type.

RESULTS

A total of 548,597 patients were identified with the majority experiencing preoperative weight loss (n= 459,500; 83.8%). The PWL cohort was older (44.8 ± 12.0 versus 43.2 ± 11.9 yr), had a reduced body mass index (BMI) (45.0 ± 7.4 versus 46.1 ± 7.6 kg/m²), and was more likely to be male (20.3% versus 18.7%). Patients with preoperative weight loss also were more likely to have metabolic co-morbidities including medication and insulin-dependent diabetes (27.0% versus 23.2%), hypertension (HTN) (48.9% versus 44.7%), dyslipidemia (DLP ) (24.6% versus 21.0%), and sleep apnea (39.6% versus 32.3%). No clinically significant differences were observed for operative length between cohorts (85.3 ± 46.9 min PWL versus 83.9 ± 46.2 min control). The protective benefit was found to be most significant for patients experiencing greatest weight loss with those experiencing a >10% PWL showing 30% decreased odds of leak (OR .68%; 95% CI [confidence interval] .56-.84; P < .0001) and a 40% decrease in odds of mortality versus those with no PWL (OR .60; 95% CI .39-.92; P = .02).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative weight loss before bariatric surgery is common, occurring in >80% of elective cases. Our findings suggest that preoperative weight loss is associated with improved odds of 30-day mortality and leaks but no differences in bleeds or overall serious complications. Additional prospective trials are needed to further evaluate the role of routine PWL in addition to ongoing development of tolerable preoperative weight-loss protocols.

The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on bariatric surgery delivery in Edmonton, Alberta: a single-centre experience

Delays in the delivery of bariatric surgery in Canada in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic have not been previously explored. Understanding the potential barriers associated with these delays may help in the implementation and delivery of enhanced bariatric protocols, thereby minimizing health care system burden and improving bariatric delivery. We present the experience of a single high-volume, accredited bariatric program in Edmonton, Alberta, in 2020. Although reductions in bariatric cases occurred during lockdown months, the overall number of cases was comparable to 2019 owing to the adoption of strategies aimed at offsetting the burden of hospital resources. These strategies included optimizing patient selection, implementing bariatric Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols, and minimizing unnecessary postoperative investigations to allow most patients to be discharged on postoperative day 1. We advocate to continue optimizing bariatric delivery in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic that so disproportionally affects those with severe obesity and its metabolic complications.

An Evaluation of the Modern North American Bariatric Surgery Landscape: Current Trends and Predictors of Procedure Selection

PURPOSE

The last 5 years have produced a dramatic transformation in the landscape of bariatric and metabolic surgery. Yet, while the landscape of bariatric procedures is changing, little is known about these trends or which factors are responsible for their evolution.

METHODS

All primary elective laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) cases were extracted from the comprehensive Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) data registry from 2015 to 2018.

RESULTS

A total of 590,971 patients were identified, with 79.6% being female. Overall, 73.4% of patients underwent LSG. The mean age was 44.5 ± 12.0 years and mean BMI was 45.3 ± 7.9 kg/m². An increase in proportion of LSG cases was observed and associated with a decrease in LRYGB cases from 2015 to 2018. Multivariable analysis identified dialysis dependence as the greatest predictor of LSG (OR 2.67; 95% CI 2.34-3.04), whereas insulin-dependent diabetes (OR 2.27; 95% CI 2.23-2.32) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (OR 1.52; 95% CI 1.51-1.55) were the two greatest predictors of LRYGB, respectively. Patients offered LSG in 2018 had a near 1.3-fold increase in odds of receiving sleeve gastrectomy vs. those offered surgery in 2015.

CONCLUSION

The overall numbers of bariatric cases have increased from 2015 to 2018 and are associated with an increase in proportion of LSG cases and a decrease in proportion of LRYGB cases over time. Factors other than patient comorbidities alone are responsible for the current trends and modern landscape of bariatric surgery.

The Genetics of Postoperative Recurrence in Crohn Disease: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Framework for Future Work

Background

Recurrence following abdominal surgery in Crohn disease is over 50%. The impact of genetics on postoperative recurrence is not well defined.

Methods

A literature search was conducted where inclusion required an assessment, by genotype, of postoperative recurrence. The primary endpoint was odds of surgical recurrence.

Results

Twenty-eight studies identified a total of 6715 patients. Thirteen loci were identified as modifying the risk of recurrence. NOD2 was identified as a risk factor for recurrence by multiple works (cumulative odds ratio: 1.64, P = 0.003).

Conclusions

A NOD2 risk allele is associated with recurrence following surgery in Crohn disease. Progress in this area will require standardized reporting in future works.

Evaluation of the Trends, Characteristics, and Outcomes in North American Youth Undergoing Elective Bariatric Surgery

BACKGROUND

Severe obesity is increasingly common in youth and young adults, but outcomes following bariatric surgery remain largely unknown. The purpose of this study was to examine the trends, clinical characteristics, and postoperative outcomes of youth who underwent bariatric surgery.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) data registry from 2015 to 2018 inclusive. All youth and young adults aged 15-24 who underwent elective sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) were included. Bivariate analysis of trends, clinical characteristics, and postoperative outcomes was performed using Chi-squared tests for categorical variables and independent two sample t test for continuous variables. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was used to determine patient and operative factors predictive of serious complications.

RESULTS

A total of 21,592 youth and young adults underwent bariatric surgery during the study time frame, representing 3.7% of total cases (n = 583,567) within the MBSAQIP. The cohort had a mean age of 21.5 ± 2.0 years and a mean BMI of 47.2 ± 8.0 kg/m² and were predominantly female (84%). A relatively constant number of youth and young adult cases per hospital were observed over time (7.4 cases/center in 2015 vs. 6.7 cases/center in 2018). Overall, < 5% of cases required reoperation, reintervention, and readmission, or led to serious complications within 30 days of surgery. Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified RYGB as the single greatest independent predictor of serious complications (OR 3.1; 95% CI 2.58-3.64; p < 0.0001). Additional factors predictive of serious complications included female sex (OR 1.31; 95% CI 1.01-1.70; p = 0.04), sleep apnea (OR 1.27; 95% CI 1.02-1.58), and non-insulin-dependent diabetes (OR 1.35; 95% CI 1.04-1.75; p = 0.025).

CONCLUSION

Bariatric surgery in youth is safe but comprised only 3.7% of total MBSAQIP cases from 2015 to 2018. These data should serve as a call to government and healthcare agencies to develop policies and strategies that prioritize bariatric surgery for young people living with severe obesity.

Surgical management of hiatal hernia vs medical therapy to treat bleeding Cameron lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Cameron lesions (CL) are an under-recognized cause of gastrointestinal bleeding. Diagnosis is often impaired by technical difficulty, and once diagnosed, management remains unclear. Typically, patients are medically managed with proton pump inhibitors (PPI). Small studies have demonstrated improved therapeutic success with surgical management, hypothesizing that reversing mechanical gastric trauma and ischemia allows CL healing. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to compare therapeutic success of surgical versus medical management of Cameron lesions (CL).

METHODS AND PROCEDURES

A comprehensive search and systematic review selected manuscripts using the following inclusion criteria: (1) Endoscopically diagnosed CL (2) Treated surgically (3) Follow-up for resolution of anemia or CL (4) n ≥ 5 (5) Excluding non-English, animal, and studies with patients < 18 years old Meta-analysis was performed to compare resolution of CLs with medical and surgical therapy.

RESULTS

Systematic search retrieved 1664 studies, of these, 14 were included (randomized controlled trial = 1; prospective = 2; retrospective = 11). Patients had a mean age of 61.2 years (range 24-91) and were more often female (59.3%). Follow-up was between 3 and 120 months, and 82.9% of patients had hernias > 5 cm. Surgical management was associated with therapeutic success (OR 5.20, 1.83-14.77, I² = 42%, p < 0.001) with 92% having resolution, compared to 67.2% for those treated with PPI. Surgical complications occurred in 42/109 (38.5%) of patients (48.1% for Open Hill Repair, 15.4% for laparoscopic fundoplication). 40.0% of patients underwent a laparoscopic Nissen or Collis fundoplication, 21.7% underwent open modified Hill repair, and 38.3% had unspecified operations. Hemoglobin improved from 8.85 g/dL pre-operatively to 13.60 g/dL post-operatively. In six studies, surgical patients previously failed medical management.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first systematic review comparing surgical and medical treatment of CL. Surgical management significantly improved therapeutic success. Our study supports therapeutic benefit of surgery in these patients.

Higher Edmonton Obesity Staging System scores are independently associated with postoperative complications and mortality following bariatric surgery: an analysis of the MBSAQIP

INTRODUCTION

Bariatric surgery is an evidence-based approach for sustained weight loss in patients with severe obesity. The most common procedures in North America are the laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). The Edmonton Obesity Staging System (EOSS) is a tool that assigns patients a score of 0 to 4 according to their obesity-related comorbidities and functional status. Previous research demonstrates that increasing EOSS score is associated with overall non-operative mortality risk.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to assess the association of the EOSS with major 30-day postoperative complications following LSG or LRYGB.

METHODS

Primary LSG or LRYGB patients were identified from the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program data registry. Patients were assigned EOSS scores according to their comorbidities and functional limitations extracted from the database. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the relationship between EOSS score, age, sex, BMI, type of procedure, or operative time with 30-day major complications.

RESULTS

From 2015 to 2017, 430,238 patients (79.4% female) who underwent primary LSG or LRYGB were identified. The relative frequencies of patients by EOSS score were: 0 and 1 (23.9%), 2 (62.8%), 3 (10.5%), and 4 (2.9%). Mean preoperative BMI was 45.4 (SD 7.9) kg/m² and mean age was 44.6 (SD 12.0) years. The overall 30-day major complication rate was 3.5%. EOSS 2, 3, and 4 were significantly associated with major complications. The strongest associations with major complications were EOSS 4 (OR 2.30; 95% CI 2.11-2.51, p < 0.001) and LRYGB versus LSG (OR 2.03; 95% CI 1.97-2.11, p < 0.001). EOSS 3 and 4 were most strongly associated with death.

CONCLUSION

Higher EOSS scores are independently associated with 30-day major postoperative complications and mortality. The EOSS provides utility in staging patients and identifying those at greater risk of postoperative complications.

Bariatric Surgery Outcomes in Patients with Previous Organ Transplant: Scoping Review and Analysis of the MBSAQIP

BACKGROUND

Obesity is a major risk factor for transplant. Laparoscopic bariatric surgery (LBS) offers transplant patient benefits including improved comorbidities, graft function, and longevity. We completed a scoping review and analyzed the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) to determine the risk-benefit profile of LBS after transplant. We also compared laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) to laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) following transplant.

METHODS

Univariate analysis determined between group differences with subgroup analysis comparing LSG versus LRYGB in transplant patients. Multivariable analysis assessed whether prior transplant was independently associated with major complications or mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 469 (0.1%) patients had previous transplant and had more comorbidities and more often underwent LSG. Operative time (93.9 min vs 83 min, p < 0.001) and length of stay were longer. Major complications were threefold higher in patients with a transplant history (9.6% vs 3.2%; p < 0.001. Previous transplant was the second greatest independent predictor for major complication (OR 2.14 [1.54-2.98], p = < 0.001) but was not predictive of death (OR 1.06 [0.14-8.13] p = 0.956). Amongst transplant patients, LRYGB demonstrated higher rates of leak (n = 1), VTE, AKI, unplanned intubation, and readmission.

CONCLUSIONS

The 30-day complication rate from LBS is three times higher amongst patients with a transplant. LSG is likely the best surgical approach. Despite risks, post-transplant patients incur important benefits from LBS. Surgeons must be aware of this risk-benefit profile when determining LBS candidacy.

Factors implicated in discharge disposition following elective bariatric surgery

BACKGROUND

Current bariatric surgery studies have focused on traditional outcomes such as mortality and morbidity and have thus far have neglected an important marker of surgical care- discharge destination.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to 1) characterize the prevalence of and clinical characteristics of patients who undergo bariatric surgery with respect to discharge disposition and to 2) evaluate factors which predict alternate care facility (ACF) discharge.

SETTING

Participating Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) centers.

METHODS

Data was extracted from the MBSAQIP data registry from 2015 to 2018. All primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) procedures were included while prior revisional surgeries and emergency surgeries were excluded. Our primary objective was to characterize the prevalence of and clinical characteristics of patients who undergo bariatric surgery and are discharged to an alternate care facility (ACF). Our secondary outcome was to identify predictors of discharge to an ACF using multivariable logistic regression modeling.

RESULTS

Most patients (n = 588,256; 99.6%) were discharged home while only a small proportion were discharged to an ACF (n = 1502; .4%). Patients discharged to an ACF were older (51.5 ± 13.5 yr versus 44.4 ± 12.0 yr; P < .0001), of increased body mass index (49.7 ± 11.9 kg/m² versus 45.3 ± 7.8 kg/m²; P < .0001), and more likely to be of male sex (26.8% versus 20.4%; P < .0001). Patients with hypertension (65.2% versus 47.9%; P < .0001), dyslipidemia (40.1% versus 23.7%; P < .0001), sleep apnea (52.7% versus 38.1%; P < .0001), and medication-dependent diabetes (39.5% versus 26.3%; P < .0001) were more likely to be discharged to an ACF. Multivariable logistic regression revealed that partially dependent and dependent functional status were the single greatest preoperative predictors of ACF discharge with an 8- and 7-fold respective increase in odds of ACF versus patients of independent functional status.

CONCLUSION

Impaired functional status was the single greatest independent preoperative predictor of ACF discharge, providing evidence against the current use of a strict age cut-off criteria and support for implementation of a more patient-centered functional approach in selection of surgical candidates.

Trends and Outcomes of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Between 2015 and 2018 in the USA and Canada

BACKGROUND

Given there are approximately 100,000 primary laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) procedures performed a year in North America, there is a need to evaluate recent trends in LSG. The objective of this study was to analyze the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) to identify trends in technical factors and patient outcomes over time.

METHODS

The MBSAQIP prospectively collects data from 854 centers in the USA and Canada. Patients undergoing primary LSG were included. Statistical analysis was performed to characterize trends in patient factors, technical factors, and 30-day postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 434,030 patients underwent primary LSG. The mean age was 44.2 (SD 12.0) years and mean body mass index was 45.1 (SD 7.8) kg/m². Baseline demographics did not vary appreciably by year. Operative time decreased from 2015 to 2018 (75.4 to 70.6 min, p < 0.001). Bougie size and stapling distance from the pylorus did not change by year. However, staple line reinforcement (66.8 to 63.2%, p < 0.001) and oversewing of the staple line (23.1 to 20.1%, p < 0.001) were less commonly performed. Postoperatively, from 2015 to 2018, there was a 45.8% relative reduction in leaks (0.48 to 0.26%, p < 0.001). There were also reductions in 30-day major complications (2.87 to 2.28%, p < 0.001), length of stay (1.72 to 1.44 days, p < 0.001), and readmissions (3.39 to 2.77%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

From 2015 to 2018, there was a decrease in staple line reinforcement and oversewing. These changes correlated with reductions in operative time, length of stay, readmission, and major complications.

Evolving Trends in North American Gastric Bypass Delivery: a Retrospective MBSAQIP Analysis of Technical Factors and Outcomes from 2015 to 2018

PURPOSE

A number of procedural and technical factors have been adopted over time to overcome the steep learning curve and adverse safety profile of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). However, the evolution and impact of these factors are not currently known which limits our ability to optimize RYGB delivery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data was extracted from the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) data registry from 2015 to 2018. All primary RYGB procedures were included while prior revisional surgeries and emergency surgeries were excluded. Primary outcomes included characterizing the trends in procedural and technical factors associated with RYGB.

RESULTS

A total of 156,941 patients underwent primary RYGB from 2015 to 2018 with a mean age of 45.2 ± 11.9 years and a mean body mass index of 46.4 ± 8.4 kg/m [1]. The majority of patients were female (80.3%), of white racial status (73.5%), and of non-smoking status (92.1%). The most commonly performed approach was laparoscopic RYGB although an increase in robotic cases was observed over time. Rates of drain placement and postoperative swallow studies decreased by 10% from 2015 to 2018. Together, these trends were associated with reductions in serious complications, readmission, and re-intervention rates over time.

CONCLUSION

The proportion of RYGB cases performed in MBSAQIP accredited centers has decreased from 2015 to 2018 associated with an increased adoption of sleeve gastrectomy Leaks, serious complications, readmission, and reintervention rates improved with each operative year suggesting that the technical proficiency and safety of RYGB continue to evolve with time.

Diagnostic accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy using indocyanine green in lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The use of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been gaining popularity with the emergence of indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging. We aimed to systematically review the literature and perform a meta-analysis on the diagnostic accuracy of SLNB using ICG for lung cancer.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library using search terms "lung/pulmonary" AND "tumor/carcinoma/cancer/neoplasm/adenocarcinoma/malignancy/squamous/carcinoid" AND "indocyanine green" was completed in June 2018. Articles were selected based on the following inclusion criteria: (1) diagnostic accuracy study design; (2) ICG injected at the tumor site with near-infrared fluorescence imaging identification of sentinel lymph nodes; (3) lymphadenectomy or sampling was performed as the gold standard.

RESULTS

Eight primary studies were included with a total of 366 patients. 43.0% of patients were females and the mean tumor size was 2.3 cm. Sentinel lymph nodes were identified with ICG in 251 patients, yielding a pooled identification rate of 0.83 (0.67-0.94). A meta-analysis of seven studies computed a diagnostic odds ratio, sensitivity, and specificity of 177.6 (45.6-691.1), 0.85 (0.71-0.94), and 1.00 (0.98-1.00), respectively. The summary receiver operator characteristic demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.963 (SE = 0.038) and a Q* of 0.91 (SE = 0.057).

CONCLUSION

Our review found suboptimal results for the diagnostic accuracy of SLNB using ICG and must be improved before routine clinical use. Further research is required to develop a robust protocol for the use SLNB with ICG for lung cancer.

Bariatric Surgery Outcomes in Patients on Preoperative Therapeutic Anticoagulation: an Analysis of the 2015 to 2017 MBSAQIP

BACKGROUND

Obesity has been found to be an independent predictor of adverse cardiac and pulmonary embolic events. As the popularity of bariatric surgery grows, surgeons are encountering more patients taking therapeutic anticoagulation medications preoperatively. This study aims to assess the safety of bariatric surgery on these patients.

METHODS

Data was extracted from 2015 to 2017 using the MBSAQIP database. Included patients were those who underwent a primary LSG or LRYGB. A multivariable regression analysis was performed looking at 30-day outcomes for pre-operatively anticoagulated patients. A secondary propensity-matched analysis was performed comparing outcomes among patients undergoing LSG vs LRYGB.

RESULTS

A total of 430,396 patients were analyzed, 11,013 (2.56%) of which were taking anticoagulation medications pre-operatively. Absolute 30-day complication rates (8.73% vs 3.36%, p < 0.001), bleed rates (3.78% vs 0.88%, p < 0.001), leak rates (0.55% vs 0.41%, p = 0.021), cardiac event rates (0.43% vs 0.06%, p < 0.001), and venous thromboembolism rates (0.68% vs 0.25%, p < 0.001) were significantly higher among pre-operatively anticoagulated patients. On multivariable analysis, pre-operative anticoagulation was found to be an independent predictor of postoperative bleeding (OR 2.76, CI 2.43-3.14, p < 0.001) and mortality (OR 2.08, CI 1.49-2.90, p < 0.001). The LRYGB was associated with a significantly higher complication rate compared to the LSG (13.27% vs 7.40%, p < 0.001) in the propensity-matched cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing bariatric surgery on anticoagulation medications pre-operatively are at a significantly higher risk of adverse outcomes post-operatively. Patients who require long-term anticoagulation should undergo careful consideration before proceeding with bariatric surgery.

Factors that predict 30-day readmission after bariatric surgery: experience of a publicly funded Canadian centre

Background

Hospital readmissions after bariatric surgery can significantly increase health care costs. Rates of readmission after bariatric surgery have ranged from 0.6% to 11.3%, but the rate of complications and the factors that predict readmission have not been well characterized in Canada. The objective of this study was to characterize readmission rates and the factors that predict 30-day readmission in a Canadian centre.

Methods

A retrospective study was performed on all patients who underwent bariatric surgery between 2010 and 2015 in a single Canadian centre. Procedures included laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB), laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB). Prospectively collected data were extracted from an administrative database. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determine which factors predict 30-day readmission.

Results

A total of 1468 patients had bariatric surgery (51.0% LRYGB, 40.5% LSG, 8.6% LAGB) during the 6-year study period, with an overall 30-day readmission rate of 7.5%. LRYGB was associated with a higher readmission rate (11.4%) than LSG (3.7%) or LAGB (1.6%). Common reasons for readmission were infection (24.8%), pain (17.4%) and nausea or vomiting (10.1%). Multivariable analysis identified 3 factors that independently predicted readmission: length of stay greater than 4 days (odds ratio [OR] 2.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-4.63, p = 0.042), LRYGB (OR 5.21, 95% CI 1.19-22.73, p = 0.028) and acute renal failure (OR 14.10, 95% CI 1.07-186.29, p = 0.045).

Conclusion

Readmissions after bariatric surgery were most commonly caused by potentially preventable factors, such as pain, nausea or vomiting. Strategies to identify and address factors associated with readmission may reduce readmissions and health care costs after bariatric surgery in a publicly funded health care system.

Idiopathic intracranial hypertension and bariatric surgery: a systematic review

Background

Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is a rare condition typically affecting women with obesity who are of child-bearing age. Patients commonly present with headaches, visual disturbances, pulsatile tinnitus and papilledema. The association between IIH and obesity has been well established in the literature, suggesting that weight loss may contribute to improving IIH. For patients with severe obesity for whom conservative management is not successful, bariatric surgery is an effective modality for weight loss. We aimed to systematically review the literature to determine the efficacy of bariatric surgery in the treatment of IIH

Methods

We conducted a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science (limited to studies in humans published in English between January 1946 and July 2015).

Results

Twelve primary studies (n = 39 patients) were included in the systematic review. All patients had a preoperative diagnosis of IIH. Preoperative body mass index (BMI) was 47.4 ± 3.6 kg/m2 ; BMI improved to 33.7 ± 2.1 kg/m2 and 33.9 ± 11.6 kg/m2 at 6 and 12 months postoperatively, respectively. Lumbar puncture opening pressures decreased from 34.4 ± 6.9 cmH2O to 14.0 ± 3.6 cmH2O after surgery. Common symptoms of IIH improved after bariatric surgery: headaches (100% preoperatively v. 10% postoperatively), visual complaints (62% v. 44%), tinnitus (56% v. 3%) and papilledema (62% v. 8%).

Conclusion

Bariatric surgery appears to lead to considerable improvement in IIH. Idiopathic intracranial hypertension is not a well-publicized comorbidity of obesity, but its presence may be considered as an indication for bariatric surgery.

Sodium phosphate is superior to polyethylene glycol in constipated patients undergoing colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Constipation is an important and highly prevalent predictor of inadequate bowel preparation during colonoscopy. In North America, between 2 and 28% of the general population suffer from constipation. Despite the high prevalence of constipation, to our knowledge, no meta-analysis on the optimal bowel preparation for constipated patients has been performed. We aimed to systematically review the literature to determine the ideal bowel preparation regiment for patients with chronic constipation.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Web of Science) was performed. We included studies that assessed the quality of bowel preparation in constipated patients receiving different agents prior to colonoscopy. The primary outcome was colon cleanliness. Secondary outcomes included tolerability of the bowel preparation and serious adverse events.

RESULTS

Preliminary database search yielded 1581 articles after duplicates were removed. After screening of the titles and abstracts using the exclusion criteria, 358 full-text articles were retained. Full-text articles were reviewed and eight studies meeting the inclusion criteria were included for qualitative synthesis. Three randomized controlled trials identified a total of 1636 constipated patients, of whom 225 were eligible for meta-analysis. Of those, 107 (47.6%) received NaP and 118 (52.4%) received PEG. Patients receiving NaP before colonoscopy had a higher chance of a successful bowel preparation than patients receiving PEG (OR 1.87, CI 1.06 to 3.32, P = 0.003). In the studies comparing PEG to NaP, two found that NaP resulted in greater tolerability of the bowel preparation and one study found that PEG resulted in superior tolerability.

CONCLUSIONS

In chronically constipated patients undergoing colonoscopy, the use of NaP may result in superior colonic cleanliness when compared to PEG, however, quality of evidence was low. Further high-quality studies are required to delineate the optimal bowel preparation in patients with constipation.

The Impact of ADHD on Outcomes Following Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

The objective our study was to carry out a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the impact of attention-deficit and hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) on bariatric surgery outcomes. Despite the effectiveness of bariatric surgery, about 10 to 20% of patients continue to regain weight after the procedure. New evidence supports that ADHD may be directly associated with obesity and may affect outcomes following bariatric surgery. However, certain psychiatric illnesses, such as ADHD, are rarely screened for, leading to a continued lack of data on the interaction between ADHD and bariatric surgery. A comprehensive literature search for both published and unpublished studies of ADHD and bariatric surgery from 1946 to August 2018 was performed. The search was conducted using the Medline, EMBASE, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases as well as conference abstracts. Our search strategy terms included "(ADHD OR attention deficit hyperactivity disorder) AND (bariatrics OR obesity surgery OR gastric bypass OR gastric sleeve OR Roux-en-Y OR RYGB OR sleeve gastrectomy)" and was limited to human studies in the English language. Preliminary database search of the literature yielded 104 articles after 70 duplicates were removed. A total of five studies with 492 patients were included. The overall ADHD rate was 20.9% with reported rates ranging from 7 to 38%. The weighted mean age was 44.0 ± 10.2 years, the weighted sex was 83.6% female, and the weighted mean follow-up was 22.2 months. Preoperative weighted mean BMI was 43.7 versus a postoperative weighted mean BMI of 34.7. No statistical significance was observed for mean BMI difference between non-ADHD vs. ADHD patients undergoing bariatric surgery (three studies; MD - 2.66; CI - 7.54 to 2.13; p = 0.28). Statistical significance was, however, observed for postoperative follow-up between patients with ADHD vs. non-ADHD subjects (three studies; MD - 7.28; - 13.83 to -0.73; p = 0.03). Patients with ADHD do not have a statistically significant mean BMI difference following bariatric surgery but have a statistically significant reduction in postoperative follow-up versus non-ADHD patients. Targeted strategies aimed at improving clinic attendance for this at-risk ADHD population may improve bariatric outcomes and minimize recidivism rates.

Predictive factors for diabetes remission after bariatric surgery

Background

Bariatric surgery has been shown to induce type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remission in severely obese patients. After laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB), diabetes remission occurs early and independently of weight loss. Previous research has identified preoperative factors for remission, such as duration of diabetes and HbA1c. Understanding factors that predict diabetes remission can help to select patients who will benefit most from bariatric surgery.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed all T2DM patients who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) or LRYGB between January 2008 and July 2014. The primary outcome was diabetes remission, defined as the absence of hypoglycemic medications, fasting blood glucose < 7.0 mmol/L and HbA1c < 6.5%. Data were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression analysis to identify predictive factors of diabetes remission.

Results

We included 207 patients in this analysis; 84 (40.6%) had LSG and 123 (59.4%) had LRYGB. Half of the patients (49.8%) achieved diabetes remission at 1 year. Multivariable logistic analysis showed that LRYGB had higher odds of diabetes remission than LSG (odds ratio [OR] 6.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.79–15.50, p < 0.001). Shorter duration of diabetes (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.83–0.99, p = 0.032) and the absence of long-acting insulin (OR 0.0011, 95% CI < 0.000–0.236, p = 0.013) predicted remission.

Conclusion

Type of bariatric procedure (LRYGB v. LSG), shorter duration of diabetes and the absence of long-acting insulin were independent predictors of diabetes remission after bariatric surgery.

Bridging interventions before bariatric surgery in patients with BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Bariatric surgery on patients with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 50 kg/m², historically known as superobesity, is technically challenging and carries a higher risk of complications. Bridging interventions have been introduced for weight loss before bariatric surgery in this population. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess the efficacy and safety of bridging interventions before bariatric surgery in patients with BMI ≥ 50 kg/m².

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched from database inception to September 2018. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they conducted any bridging intervention for weight loss in patients with BMI greater than 50 kg/m² prior to bariatric surgery. Primary outcome was the change in BMI before and after bridging intervention. Secondary outcomes included comorbidity status after bridging interventions and resulting complications. Pooled mean differences (MD) were calculated using random effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS

13 studies including 550 patients met inclusion criteria (mean baseline BMI of 61.26 kg/m²). Bridging interventions included first-step laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), intragastric balloon (IGB), and liquid low-calorie diet program (LLCD). There was a reduction of BMI by 12.8 kg/m² after a bridging intervention (MD 12.8, 95% CI 9.49-16.1, P < 0.0001). Specifically, LSG demonstrated a BMI reduction of 15.2 kg/m² (95% CI 12.9-17.5, P < 0.0001) and preoperative LLCD by 9.8 kg/m² (95% CI 9.82-15.4, P = 0.0006). IGB did not demonstrate significant weight loss prior to bariatric surgery. There was remission or improvement of type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and sleep apnea in 62.8%, 74.6%, and 74.6% of patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

First-step LSG and LLCD are both safe and appropriate bridging interventions which can allow for effective weight loss prior to bariatric surgery in patients with BMI greater than 50 kg/m².

Evaluating the safety of bariatric surgery for weight loss in class I obesity: A propensity-matched analysis of North American data

BACKGROUND

Bariatric surgery is an effective treatment for severe obesity. However, there has been an evolving role for bariatric surgery as a primary treatment in the management of class I obesity.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to assess the safety of surgery by directly comparing surgical outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) in class I obesity (body mass index [BMI] 30-35 kg/m²) with those with class II obesity (BMI 35-40 kg/m²) and higher (BMI >40 kg/m²) using an analysis of a large-scale matched-patient cohort analysis.

SETTING

Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database, United States and Canada.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis using the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database, which collects patient information from >790 bariatric surgery centers in North America. Patients included in our analysis underwent surgery in the years 2015 and 2016 and had either LRYGB or LSG for weight loss.

RESULTS

Initial analysis included 274,091 patients. Propensity-matching resulted in 9104 patients for analysis in each of the class I and class II and higher groups. The overall major complication rate between the 2 matched groups was 3.9% for class I and 3.5% for class II and higher (P = .11). We did not find that class I obesity was associated with an increased risk of 30-day complication or death.

CONCLUSIONS

In our analysis of propensity-matched patients undergoing LSG and LRYGB for weight loss, class I obesity did not have statistically higher risk of postoperative complication rates compared with class II and higher.

The impact of traumatic injury in the oil and gas industry

Introduction

The oil and gas industry employs approximately 390,000 people in Canada and these workers are often exposed to substantial workplace risks. Trauma centres treat a significant number of industry-related injuries; however, studies characterizing these traumatic events are lacking.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted of workers in the oil and gas industry admitted to major trauma centres in Edmonton, Alberta from January 2009 to December 2014. Patients were identified from Alberta Trauma Registry and Worker's Compensation Board data. Inclusion criteria were: age ≥16 years, trauma occurring in the oil and gas industry, and Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥ 12 or Modified Abbreviated Injury Scale (MAIS) ≥ 3. Descriptive analysis and cost estimation were performed.

Results

There were 182 major traumas occurring primarily in young males. Blunt trauma was the primary mechanism (90.1%), and alcohol levels were positive in 4.8% of patients. The overall complication rate was 32.4% with a mortality rate of 6%. The majority of patients were discharged home (64.3%), however a large proportion (29.7%) required further care at another facility post-acute care. The median days missed from work were 85 (IQR 7–214.5). Total cost of injury from the societal perspective ranged from $109 965 to $332 098 USD per person.

Conclusion

Oil and gas industry trauma has a high economic and societal cost. Strategies to prevent injuries in this field should be undertaken including promotion and support of drug-free programmes given the rate of positive alcohol screening in this population.

Diagnostic evaluation of sentinel lymph node biopsy using indocyanine green and infrared or fluorescent imaging in gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Sentinel node navigation surgery (SNNS) for gastric cancer using infrared visualization of indocyanine green (ICG) is intriguing because it may limit operative morbidity. We are the first to systematically review and perform meta-analysis on the diagnostic utility of ICG and infrared electronic endoscopy (IREE) or near infrared fluorescent imaging (NIFI) for SNNS exclusively in gastric cancer.

METHODS

A search of electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library using search terms "gastric/stomach" AND "tumor/carcinoma/cancer/neoplasm/adenocarcinoma/malignancy" AND "indocyanine green" was completed in May 2017. Articles were selected by two independent reviewers based on the following major inclusion criteria: (1) diagnostic accuracy study design; (2) indocyanine green was injected at tumor site; (3) IREE or NIFI was used for intraoperative visualization. 327 titles or abstracts were screened. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2.

RESULTS

Ten full text studies were selected. 643 patients were identified with the majority of patients possessing T1 tumors (79.8%). Pooled identification rate, diagnostic odds ratio, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.99 (0.97-1.0), 380.0 (68.71-2101), 0.87 (0.80-0.93), and 1.00 (0.99-1.00), respectively. The summary receiver operator characteristic for ICG + IREE/NIFI demonstrated a test accuracy of 98.3%. Subgroup analysis found improved test performance for studies with low-risk QUADAS-2 scores, studies published after 2010 and submucosal ICG injection. IREE had improved diagnostic odds ratio, sensitivity, and identification rate compared to NIFI. Heterogeneity among studies ranged from low (I² < 25%) to high (I² > 75%).

CONCLUSIONS

We found encouraging results regarding the accuracy, diagnostic odds ratio, and specificity of the test. The sensitivity was not optimal but may be improved by a strict protocol to augment the technique. Given the number and heterogeneity of studies, our results must be viewed with caution.

The Effect of Helicobacter pylori on Postoperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Helicobacter pylori (HP) occurs in 50% of people worldwide with higher rates reported in the bariatric population. HP has been associated with adverse outcomes following bariatric surgery; however, its true impact has not yet been defined. We aimed to systematically review the effect of HP on bariatric surgery outcomes. A comprehensive literature review was conducted yielding seven studies with 255,435 patients. Meta-analysis found comparable rates of bleeding, leak, hospital length of stay, and weight loss between HP-positive and HP-negative patients. HP was, however, found to be the largest independent predictor of marginal ulceration in those undergoing RYGB, with a tenfold increase versus HP-negative patients. Overall, HP is associated with increased marginal ulceration rates, but has little impact on other bariatric surgery outcomes.