Continuous Glucose Monitoring After Gastric Bypass to Evaluate the Glucose Variability After a Low-Carbohydrate Diet and to Determine Hypoglycemia

Glycemic variability and hypoglycemia before and after Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy - A cohort study of females without diabetes

BACKGROUND

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) lead to lower fasting glucose concentrations, but might cause higher glycemic variability (GV) and increased risk of hypoglycemia. However, it has been sparsely studied in patients without preoperative diabetes under normal living conditions.

OBJECTIVES

To study 24-hour interstitial glucose (IG) concentrations, GV, the occurrence of hypoglycemia and dietary intake before and after laparoscopic RYGB and SG in females without diabetes.

SETTING

Outpatient bariatric units at a community and a university hospital.

METHODS

Continuous glucose monitoring and open-ended food recording over 4 days in 4 study periods: at baseline, during the preoperative low-energy diet (LED) regimen, and at 6 and 12 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Of 47 patients included at baseline, 83%, 81%, and 79% completed the remaining 3 study periods. The mean 24-hour IG concentration was similar during the preoperative LED regimen and after surgery and significantly lower compared to baseline in both surgical groups. GV was significantly increased 6 and 12 months after surgery compared to baseline. The self-reported carbohydrate intake was positively associated with GV after surgery. IG concentrations below 3.9 mmol/L were observed in 14/25 (56%) of RYGB- and 9/12 (75%) of SG-treated patients 12 months after surgery. About 70% of patients with low IG concentrations also reported hypoglycemic symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

The lower IG concentration in combination with the higher GV after surgery, might create a lower margin to hypoglycemia. This could help explain the increased occurrence of hypoglycemic episodes after RYGB and SG.

Postbariatric hypoglycemia, abdominal pain and gastrointestinal symptoms after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass explored by continuous glucose monitoring

BACKGROUND

Abdominal pain and postbariatric hypoglycemia (PBH) are common after bariatric surgery.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to explore the potential relationship between abdominal pain, gastrointestinal symptoms, and PBH more than a decade after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and whether continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) with dietary intervention has an educational role in reducing symptoms.

SUBJECTS

At two public hospitals in Norway (one University Hospital) 22 of 46 invited patients who reported abdominal pain more than weekly took part. Recruited from a prospective follow-up study of 546 patients 14.5 years after RYGB.

METHODS

They used a CGM for two 14-day periods, with a dietary intervention between periods. The Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) and the Dumping Severity Score (DSS) questionnaires were completed at the start and end of the study.

RESULTS

The 22 women had preoperative age 39.6 ± 7.7 years and body mass index (BMI) 42.0 ± 4.0 kg/m2, present age 54.6 ± 7.7 years and BMI 29.8 ± 4.8 kg/m2. The total GSRS score and DSS of early dumping decreased after the diet intervention. The number of events with Level 1 (<3.9 mmol/L) or Level 2 (<3.0 mmol/L) hypoglycemia did not change in the second period. Half of the patients had fewer, three had unchanged, and eight had more frequent events with Level 1 hypoglycemia after the intervention. Ten patients had Level 2 hypoglycemia.

CONCLUSION

Though inconclusive findings, a personalized dietary intervention reduces GSRS. This intervention was accompanied by lower mean absolute glucose in patients with recurrent abdominal pain after bariatric surgery. However, further studies are needed to explore the benefits of CGM in this setting.

Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Patients Following Bariatric Surgery: A Scoping Review

The objective of this scoping review was to summarize the emerging literature on the use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in post-bariatric surgery patients, with a focus on its features (e.g., device, mode, and accuracy), as well as purposes and outcomes of utilization. Three databases (PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science) were searched to obtain relevant studies. Results suggested that most studies used CGM for 3-7 days under blinded mode. Accuracy data were available in only one study, which reported a mean absolute relative difference of 21.7% for Freestyle Libre. The primary applications of CGM were for elucidating glucose patterns and assessing glycemic treatment outcomes. No study has tested the effect of CGM as an intervention strategy to enhance glucose control.

Associations between oral processing, saliva, and bolus properties on daily glucose excursions amongst people at risk of type-2 diabetes

Background: A greater time spent with glucose above the normal range (TAR) has been associated with poorer glycaemic control amongst pre-diabetic individuals. Individual differences in oral processing behaviours and saliva amylase activity have been shown to influence glucose responses. Objective: The current study is a preliminary exploration of the associations of oral processing behaviours, bolus characteristics, and salivary amylase activity with the variability in daily glucose excursions within a free-living setting in populations with an elevated risk of type-2 diabetes. Method: Participant oral processing behaviour was derived from video recordings while they consumed a test meal. Post-meal bolus characteristics and saliva properties were measured. Participants were fitted with a continuous glucose monitor (CGM) which monitored blood glucose fluctuation over 7 consecutive free-living days. Dietary intake was recorded through a smartphone application and physical activity was monitored using a wrist worn accelerometer. Results: Participants varied in daily time spent with glucose above the normal range (>7.8 mmol l^-1) from 0% to 15%. Greater saliva uptake in the bolus was associated with a higher time spent above the normal range for glucose (β = 0.067 [95% CI = 0.015, 0.120]; p < 0.05), which remained significant after adjustment for dietary carbohydrate intake and BMI. Salivary amylase and saliva flow rate were not significantly associated with the time spent above the normal range. Conclusion: In addition to conventional dietary factors, more research is needed to understand how eating behaviours such as oro-sensory exposure, bolus surface area, and saliva uptake contribute to daily variations in postprandial glucose excursions among populations with a higher risk of developing type-2 diabetes.

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus best medical treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus in adults with body mass index between 27 and 32 kg/m2: A 5-year randomized controlled trial

AIMS

To evaluate the effects of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) versus best medical treatment in Asians with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and class I obesity.

METHODS

In this 5-year single-centre, open-label randomized controlled trial, participants were randomized to RYGB or medical treatment including newer classes of diabetes medications (ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT02041234). The primary endpoint was diabetes remission defined as HbA1c ≤ 6% (≤42 mmol/mol) and discontinuation of glucose-lowering medication at 12 months post-intervention and beyond. Glycaemia and weight changes were assessed. Continuous glucose monitoring was performed.

RESULTS

Of 28 subjects randomized, 26 were analyzed in the final cohort (14 medical, 12 RYGB; age:44 ± 10 years, 34.6% males, BMI:29.4 ± 1.6 kg/m²). At 12 months, 50% of RYGB subjects achieved diabetes remission; 83% stopped all glucose-lowering medications. By year 5, 42% were in remission. None attained diabetes remission in the medical group. Percentage declines in fasting plasma glucose, HbA1c and BMI were significantly greater in the RYGB arm (all P < 0.05). Early improvements in glycaemic variability and time in range were similar in both treatment arms. Hypoglycaemia and surgical complications were observed in some RYGB subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

Over 5 years, RYGB outperforms best medical treatment in glycemia and weight improvements for Asians with T2DM and class I obesity.

Retrospective study of glycemic variability, BMI, and blood pressure in diabetes patients in the Digital Twin Precision Treatment Program

The objective of this retrospective observational cohort study was to measure glycemic variability and reductions in body mass index (BMI), blood pressure (BP), and use of antihypertensive medications in type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients participating in the digital twin-enabled Twin Precision Treatment (TPT) Program. Study participants included 19 females and 45 males with T2D who chose to participate in the TPT Program and adhered to program protocols. Nine additional enrollees were excluded due to major program non-adherence. Enrollees were required to have adequate hepatic and renal function, no myocardial infarction, stroke, or angina ≤ 90 days before enrollment, and no history of ketoacidosis or major psychiatric disorders. The TPT program uses Digital Twin technology, machine learning algorithms, and precision nutrition to aid treatment of patients with T2D. Each study participant had ≥ 3 months of follow-up. Outcome measures included glucose percentage coefficient of variation (%CV), low blood glucose index (LBGI), high blood glucose index (HBGI), systolic and diastolic BP, number of antihypertensive medications, and BMI. Sixty-four patients participated in the program. Mean (± standard deviation) %CV, LBGI, and HBGI values were low (17.34 ± 4.35, 1.37 ± 1.37, and 2.13 ± 2.79, respectively) throughout the 90-day program. BMI decreased from 29.23 ± 5.83 at baseline to 27.43 ± 5.25 kg/m². Systolic BP fell from 134.72 ± 17.73 to 124.58 ± 11.62 mm Hg. Diastolic BP decreased from 83.95 ± 10.20 to 80.33 ± 7.04 mm Hg. The percent of patients taking antihypertensive medications decreased from 35.9% at baseline to 4.7% at 90 days. During 90 days of the TPT Program, patients achieved low glycemic variability and significant reductions in BMI and BP. Antihypertensive medication use was eliminated in nearly all patients. Future research will focus on randomized case–control comparisons.

Glycemic Patterns Are Distinct in Post-Bariatric Hypoglycemia After Gastric Bypass (PBH-RYGB)

CONTEXT

Severe hypoglycemia with neuroglycopenia, termed post-bariatric hypoglycemia (PBH). typically occurs postprandially, but it is also reported after activity or mid-nocturnally.

OBJECTIVE

To quantify glycemia, glycemic variability, and magnitude/duration of low sensor glucose (SG) values in patients with PBH after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (PBH-RYGB).

METHODS

This retrospective analysis of data from an academic medical center included individuals with PBH-RYGB (n = 40), reactive hypoglycemia without gastrointestinal surgery (Non-Surg Hypo, n = 20), prediabetes (Pre-DM, n = 14), newly diagnosed T2D (n = 5), and healthy controls (HC, n = 38). Masked continuous glucose monitoring (Dexcom G4) was used to assess patterns over 24 hours, daytime (6 am-midnight) and nighttime (midnight-6 am). Prespecified measures included mean and median SG, variability, and percent time at thresholds of sensor glucose.

RESULTS

Mean and median SG were similar for PBH-RYGB and HC (mean: 99.8 ± 18.6 vs 96.9 ± 10.2 mg/dL; median: 93.0 ± 14.8 vs 94.5 ± 7.4 mg/dL). PBH-RYGB had a higher coefficient of variation (27.3 ± 6.8 vs 17.9 ± 2.4%, P < 0.0001) and range (154.5 ± 50.4 vs 112.0 ± 26.7 mg/dL, P < 0.0001). Nadir was lowest in PBH-RYGB (42.5 ± 3.7 vs HC 49.0 ± 11.9 mg/dL, P = 0.0046), with >2-fold greater time with SG < 70 mg/dL vs HC (7.7 ± 8.4 vs 3.2 ± 4.1%, P = 0.0013); these differences were greater at night (12.6 ± 16.9 vs 1.0 ± 1.5%, P < 0.0001). Non-Surg Hypo also had 4-fold greater time with SG < 70 at night vs HC (SG < 70: 4.0 ± 5.9% vs 1.0 ± 1.5%), but glycemic variability was not increased.

CONCLUSION

Patients with PBH-RYGB experience higher glycemic variability and frequency of SG < 70 compared to HC, especially at night. These data suggest that additional pathophysiologic mechanisms beyond prandial changes contribute to PBH.

Acute Effects of Sleeve Gastrectomy on Glucose Variability, Glucose Metabolism, and Ghrelin Response

PURPOSE

This study aims to examine the changes of glucose metabolism, glucose variability (GV), and ghrelin secretion within 1 week following SG in Chinese patients with obesity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-nine patients with obesity (15 with type 2 diabetes) were enrolled to undergo SG. Within 1 week before and after surgery, liquid meal tests were performed in all subjects, and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) was performed in diabetic patients. Blood samples were collected at 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 120, and 180 min for glucose, C-peptide, insulin, and ghrelin analysis in liquid meal test. Mean amplitude of glucose excursions (MAGE), standard deviations (SD), and percent time-in-range (%TIR) determined by CGM were analyzed.

RESULTS

Both in diabetic and non-diabetic groups, significant decrease was observed in glucose, insulin, C-peptide, and ghrelin. Homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance and liver fat content was decreased. In diabetic group, MAGE and SD were decreased significantly, and the percent time-in-range was higher. The decrease in blood glucose was positively correlated with the decrease in ghrelin concentration in non-diabetic group.

CONCLUSION

Within 1 week after SG, both glucose metabolism and glucose variability were improved significantly. Suppression of ghrelin secretion postoperatively might be a driver of this early improved glycemia homeostasis.

Intermittent Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring: Expanding the Clinical Value of CGM

In addition to the continuous use, the intermittent use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is an application of CGM, expanding the typical medical use cases. There are a variety of reasons and occasions that speak in favor of using CGM only for a limited time. To date, these circumstances have not been sufficiently discussed. In this article, we define discontinuous or intermittent CGM use, provide reasons for using it, and expand on the benefits and possibilities of using CGM on a temporary basis. We aim to draw attention to this important topic in the discussion of CGM use and give examples for a different method of CGM use. As well, we would like to foster the allocation of CGM to the right patient groups and indications, especially in cases of limited resources. From a global point of view, intermittent CGM use is more likely to occur than continuous use, primarily for economic reasons.

Continuous glucose monitoring in patients with remission of type 2 diabetes after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy without or with duodenojejunal bypass

Bariatric surgery is associated with a high remission rate of type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, it is unclear whether patients showing remission of diabetes actually have normal blood glucose levels throughout the day. We therefore performed continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in 15 ambulatory patients showing remission of diabetes after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) without or with duodenojejunal bypass (DJB) at the time of diabetic remission (12.9 ± 1.8 months after bariatric surgery). The definition of remission of diabetes was based on the American Diabetes Association criteria. The mean, SD, and coefficient of variation (CV) of glucose calculated from CGM were 6.2 ± 0.6 mmol/L, 1.5 ± 0.4 mmol/L, and 23.7 ± 6.2%, respectively. These values were higher than those of healthy participants without diabetes previously reported. The percentages of time spent above 10.0 mmol/L and below 3.9 mmol/L were 2.6 (IQR 0-5.0)% and 0 (IQR 0-8.0)%, respectively. Thus, patients with remission of diabetes after LSG or LSG/DJB still had substantial periods of hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia throughout the day. Therefore, we must manage patients with diabetes carefully, even after apparent remission of type 2 diabetes in response to bariatric surgery.

Patient involvement to inform the design of a clinical trial in postbariatric hypoglycaemia

Background

Bariatric surgery may lead to symptomatic postprandial hypoglycaemia as a major side effect without established therapy so far. We aimed to develop an evidence-based study design of a clinical trial that tests treatment options and can provide useful patient-relevant evidence.

Methods

We searched systematically for guidance of core outcome sets to determine the most relevant types of outcomes and duration of such a trial. Our search comprised literature databases, a database of core outcome sets and self-help organizations. We then developed a simple online questionnaire based on interviews with German-speaking patients with postprandial hypoglycaemia after bariatric surgery. We recruited participants by reaching out to all German speaking endocrinologists in Switzerland and large Swiss bariatric centres. We asked for preferences regarding outcome types and acceptable duration of being included in a corresponding clinical trial.

Results

The literature search did not identify evidence-based guidance for informing our study design. Experience of clinical and research routine as well as patient interviews helped in identifying potential outcomes and the design of an online questionnaire. Therein, a total of 29 persons started the questionnaire and 22 answered questions related to the primary outcome. Of these, 17 (77.3%) deemed quality of life more relevant as primary outcome than the rate of hypoglycaemic episodes. A trial length of four weeks or longer was regarded as acceptable for 19 of 21 respondents to this question (91.4%) and of six months or longer for 12 respondents (56%).

Conclusions

In situations with no other guidance, a simple questionnaire may help to inform trial design decisions. This study identifies a patient preference for “quality of life” as a primary outcome and supports the evidence-based conception of a patient-centred clinical trial in postbariatric hypoglycaemia.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1186/s12874-020-01171-z.

Features of oral glucose tolerance tests in patients after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with and without hypoglycaemia symptoms in daily life: It's all about speed

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the glucose and insulin profiles during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This retrospective study consisted of two groups that had undergone RYGB. The symptomatic (S) group (n = 27) had an OGTT at presentation, whereas the asymptomatic (A) group (n = 99) had an OGTT 1 year after RYGB. Each group was subdivided into two groups, namely, those with glycaemia <54 mg/dL (S1/A1) and those with glycaemia >54 mg/dL (S2/A2) during OGTT. Most of the patients underwent OGTT preoperatively.

RESULTS

Preoperatively, the glucose and insulin levels, as well as the speed of increase and decrease, were similar in all groups. Postoperatively, the minimum glucose levels during the OGTT did not differ between the symptomatic and asymptomatic groups (55 ± 19 vs. 54 ± 17 mg/dL) or between the S1 and A1 subgroups (39 ± 7 vs. 43 ± 8 mg/dL). The peak glucose values were higher in the symptomatic versus the asymptomatic group (236 ± 52 vs. 189 ± 43 mg/dL; P <0.05) and in the S1 and S2 versus the A1 and A2 subgroups. The speed of glucose increase and decline was significantly higher in the symptomatic group versus the asymptomatic group, with the speed of glucose decline being the highest in the S1 subgroup.

CONCLUSION

Assessing hypoglycaemia after a gastric bypass remains challenging. Our study suggests that the main difference in glucose dynamics between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients might be the speed of glucose and insulin increase and decline during OGTT rather than the absolute values obtained.

Potential contribution of the gut microbiota to hypoglycemia after gastric bypass surgery

Obesity has become a global health problem. Lifestyle modification and medical treatment only appear to yield short-term weight loss. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is the most popular bariatric procedure, and it sustains weight reduction and results in the remission of obesity-associated comorbidities for obese individuals. However, patients who undergo this surgery may develop hypoglycemia. To date, the diagnosis is challenging and the prevalence of post-RYGB hypoglycemia (PRH) is unclear. RYGB alters the anatomy of the upper gastrointestinal tract and has a combined effect of caloric intake restriction and nutrient malabsorption. Nevertheless, the physiologic changes after RYGB are complex. Although hyperinsulinemia, incretin effects, dysfunction of β-cells and α-cells, and some other factors have been widely investigated and are reported to be possible mediators of PRH, the pathogenesis is still not completely understood. In light of the important role of the gut microbiome in metabolism, we hypothesized that the gut microbiome might also be a critical link between RYGB and hypoglycemia. In this review, we mainly highlight the current possible factors predisposing individuals to PRH, particularly related to the gut microbiota, which may yield significant insights into the intestinal regulation of glucose metabolic homeostasis and provide novel clues to improve the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Continuous glucose monitoring for hypoglycaemia in children: Perspectives in 2020

Hypoglycaemia in children is a major risk factor for adverse neurodevelopment with rates as high as 50% in hyperinsulinaemic hypoglycaemia (HH). A key part of management relies upon timely identification and treatment of hypoglycaemia. The current standard of care for glucose monitoring is by infrequent fingerprick plasma glucose testing but this carries a high risk of missed hypoglycaemia identification. High-frequency Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) offers an attractive alternative for glucose trend monitoring and glycaemic phenotyping but its utility remains largely unestablished in disorders of hypoglycaemia. Attempts to determine accuracy through correlation with plasma glucose measurements using conventional methods such as Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) overestimate accuracy at hypoglycaemia. The inaccuracy of CGM in true hypoglycaemia is amplified by calibration algorithms that prioritize hyperglycaemia over hypoglycaemia with minimal objective evidence of efficacy in HH. Conversely, alternative algorithm design has significant potential for predicting hypoglycaemia to prevent neuroglycopaenia and consequent brain dysfunction in childhood disorders. Delays in the detection of hypoglycaemia, alarm fatigue, device calibration and current high cost are all barriers to the wider adoption of CGM in disorders of hypoglycaemia. However, machine learning, artificial intelligence and other computer-generated algorithms now offer significant potential for further improvement in CGM device technology and widespread application in childhood hypoglycaemia.

Use of flash glucose monitoring for post-bariatric hypoglycaemia diagnosis and management

Our aim was to assess the potential of flash glucose monitoring (FGM) for diagnostic workup of suspected post-bariatric hypoglycaemia (PBH). Patients (N = 13) with suspected PBH underwent a food and symptoms diary (FSD) record along with FGM over 14 days. Targeted data analysis confirmed the occurrence of low glucose events in parallel to meal-triggered symptoms. Glycaemic variability, as assessed by Mean Absolute Glucose change (MAG change), was increased, while a higher risk of glycaemic excursions towards both hyper and hypoglycaemia (ADRR_FGMGT) was observed in those with more frequent and severe hypoglycaemia. The herein described hypoglycaemia risk index (LBGI_FGMGT) with a cut-off value of 4.6 showed to have 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity for PBH. This pilot proof-of-concept study highlighted that FSD coupled with FGM followed by targeted data analysis, provides relevant insights towards PBH diagnosis and grading in a user-friendly and easy to implement study protocol. Furthermore, LBGI_FGMGT demonstrated to be an excellent index for PBH diagnosis. The unexpected improvement of glucose profile noticed along the monitoring time also unravels a possible application for PBH management.

Management of Diabetes in Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The number of bariatric surgeries for patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes continues to grow. Clinicians are challenged to choose therapies that reach glycemic targets without inducing adverse effects in post-bariatric patients without published guidelines. This review evaluates data supporting the best strategies for diabetes management in patients undergoing bariatric surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

Though few clinical trials have evaluated the safety and effectiveness of different glucose-lowering therapies following bariatric surgery, remission of diabetes or reduced medications is an established benefit of bariatric surgery. Adverse events including diabetic ketoacidosis in post-bariatric patients on sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors or inadequate insulin have been reported in patient's with both type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Metformin, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, SGLT2 inhibitors, insulin, and sulfonylureas have been used successfully in the perioperative period for other surgeries and guidelines recommend adjusting the doses of these medications especially in the perioperative period. Clinicians should favor weight-neutral or weight-loss promoting therapies in post-bariatric surgery patients such as medical nutrition therapy, metformin, GLP-1 agonists, SGLT2 inhibitors, and DPP-4 inhibitors.

Mechanisms of action of a carbohydrate-reduced, high-protein diet in reducing the risk of postprandial hypoglycemia after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery

BACKGROUND

Postprandial hypoglycemia is a risk after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB).

OBJECTIVES

We speculated that a carbohydrate-reduced, high-protein (CRHP) diet might reduce the risk of hypoglycemia and therefore compared the acute effects of a conventionally recommended (CR) diet and CRHP diet [55/30 energy percent (E%) carbohydrate and 15/30 E% protein, respectively] in RYGB patients.

METHODS

Ten individuals (2 males, 8 females, mean ± SD age 47 ± 7 y; stable body mass index 31 ± 6 kg/m2; 6 ± 3 y post-RYGB) with recurrent postprandial hypoglycemia documented by plasma glucose (PG) ≤3.4 mmol/L were examined on 2 d with isoenergetic CRHP or CR diets comprising a breakfast and subsequent lunch meal.

RESULTS

Peak PG was significantly reduced on the CRHP diet after breakfast and lunch by 11% and 31% compared with the CR diet. Nadir PG increased significantly on CRHP (by 13% and 9%). Insulin secretion was reduced, and glucagon secretion increased on the CRHP diet after both meals. Glucagon-like peptide 1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide secretion were lower after lunch but unaltered after breakfast on CRHP; β-cell function and insulin clearance were unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS

The CRHP diet lowered glucose excursions and reduced insulin secretion and incretin hormone responses, but enhanced glucagon responses compared with the CR diet. Taken together, the results may explain the decreased glucose variability and lower risk of postprandial hypoglycemia. This study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02665715.

Continuous glucose monitoring in the management of patients after gastric bypass

In patients with gastric bypass (GB), high glucose variability (GV) and hypoglycemia have been demonstrated, which could impact the metabolic status and eating behavior. We describe the glucose patterns determined through continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in two patients with >5 years follow-up after GB and significant weight recovery, who reported hypoglycemic symptoms that interfered with daily activities, and their response to a nutritional and psycho-educative prescription. Case 1: A 40-year-old woman without pre-surgical type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and normal HbA1c, in whom CGM showed high GV and hypoglycemic episodes that did not correlate with the time of hypoglycemic symptoms. Her GV reduced after prescription of a diet with low glycemic index and modification of meal patterns. Case 2: A 48-year-old male with pre-surgical diagnosis of T2DM and current normal HbA1c, reported skipping meals. The CGM showed high GV, 15% of time in hypoglycemia and hyperglycemic spikes. After prescription of a low glycemic index diet, his GV increased and time in hypoglycemia decreased. Through the detailed self-monitoring needed for CGM, we discovered severe anxiety symptoms, consumption of simple carbohydrates and lack of meal structure. He was referred for more intensive psychological counseling. In conclusion, CGM can detect disorders in glucose homeostasis derived both from the mechanisms of bariatric surgery, as well as the patient’s behaviors and mental health, improving decision-making during follow-up.

Role of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Clinical Trials: Recommendations on Reporting

Thanks to significant improvements in the precision, accuracy, and usability of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), its relevance in both ambulatory diabetes care and clinical research is increasing. In this study, we address the latter perspective and derive provisional reporting recommendations. CGM systems have been available since around the year 2000 and used primarily in people with type 1 diabetes. In contrast to self-measured glucose, CGM can provide continuous real-time measurement of glucose levels, alerts for hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia, and a detailed assessment of glycemic variability. Through a broad spectrum of derived glucose data, CGM should be a useful tool for clinical evaluation of new glucose-lowering medications and strategies. It is the only technology that can measure hyperglycemic and hypoglycemic exposure in ambulatory care, or provide data for comprehensive assessment of glucose variability. Other advantages of current CGM systems include the opportunity for improved self-management of glycemic control, with particular relevance to those at higher risk of or from hypoglycemia. We therefore summarize the current status and limitations of CGM from the perspective of clinical trials and derive suggested recommendations for how these should facilitate optimal CGM use and reporting of data in clinical research.

Evaluation of carbohydrate restriction as primary treatment for post-gastric bypass hypoglycemia

BACKGROUND

Up to 15% of patients who have undergone Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery may eventually develop symptoms of hypoglycemia.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the daily life efficacy of a carbohydrate (carb)-restricted dietary advice (CRD) of 6 meals per day with a 30 g carb maximum per meal in patients with documented post-RYGB hypoglycemia.

SETTING

Teaching hospital, the Netherlands.

METHODS

Frequency and severity of hypoglycemic events before and after CRD were assessed retrospectively in 41 patients with documented post-RYGB hypoglycemia, based on medical records and telephone questionnaires. Hypoglycemia was defined as a blood glucose level<3.0 mmol/L. Results are expressed as mean values±standard error or median and range.

RESULTS

CRD decreased the number of hypoglycemic events per month from 17.1 (1.5-180) to 2.5 (0-180), i.e., a decline of 85% (P<.001). The lowest blood glucose measured during a hypoglycemic event increased from 2.1±.4 to 2.6±.2 mmol/L (P = .004). The number of patients who had required outside help in the treatment of hypoglycemia, decreased from 23 to 6 (P<.001). In 14 patients (34.1%) the diet-induced reduction of hypoglycemia was insufficient and required the start of insulin suppressive therapy.

CONCLUSION

A CRD, consisting of 6 meals per day with up to 30 g carbs each, is an effective treatment of post-RYGB hypoglycemia in the majority of patients. Additional medication is needed in about a third of patients.