Bariatric Embolization of the Left Gastric Arteries for the Treatment of Obesity: 9-Month Data in 5 Patients

Gastric transcatheter chemoembolization combined with systemic chemotherapy vs. systemic chemotherapy alone for patients with advanced gastric cardiac cancer presenting with dysphagia: A case control study

The present study aimed to assess the effectiveness of gastric transcatheter chemoembolization (GTC) combined with systemic chemotherapy (SYS) compared with SYS alone in managing dysphagia, and improving the quality of life (QoL) and nutritional status of patients with advanced gastric cardiac cancer (AGCC). A retrospective review was performed using data from consecutive patients with AGCC who experienced dysphagia and underwent either SYS alone or SYS combined with GTC from January 2018 to December 2022. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed to address potential confounding factors. Ogilvie dysphagia scores were used to assess dysphagia, the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General 7 (FACT-G7) was used to assess QoL, and the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) was used to evaluate nutritional status. After PSM, a total of 228 patients were included in the analysis, with 114 in each group. At 4 and 8 weeks after the initial treatment, the GTC + SYS group demonstrated significantly lower median Ogilvie scores compared with the SYS alone group (P<0.001). Similarly, the median PG-SGA score at 4 weeks after the initial treatment was 2.0 in the GTC + SYS group and 6.0 in the SYS alone group. The median FACT-G7 scores in the GTC + SYS group was 13.0, compared with 10.5 in the SYS alone group. These differences remained significant at 8 weeks (P<0.001). In conclusion, the addition of GTC to SYS may more effectively and promptly relieve dysphagia, improve nutritional status and enhance QoL compared with SYS alone in patients with AGCC presenting with dysphagia.

Adding Short to Left Gastric Artery Embolization for the Treatment of Obesity: Safety and Effectiveness

PURPOSE

This study assessed the safety and effectiveness of a technical modification that involves adding short gastric artery (SGA) embolization to left gastric artery (LGA) embolization.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective single-center study analyzed twenty obese patients (median age of 53.5 (30-73)) who were not eligible for bariatric surgery and underwent bariatric embolization with 300-500-µm microspheres in addition to a lifestyle counseling program between March 2021 and July 2022. Eight patients had LGA + SGA embolization, and twelve had LGA embolization alone. The primary outcome measure was total body weight loss (TBWL) at 6 months in the SGA + LGA and the LGA-only cohorts. Safety was assessed, defined as the 30-day adverse events rate according to the SIR classification.

RESULTS

The mean 6-month post-embolization TBWL in the SGA + LGA cohort was 7.3 kg (95%CI 2.1-12.4; p = .01) and 4.1 kg (95%CI 0.4-8.6; p = 0.034) in the LGA-only cohort (mean difference - 3.1 kg ± 2.8; 95%CI (- 9.1-2.8); p = .28). The mean 6-month post-embolization TBWL in the entire cohort was 5.3 kg (p < .01). The rate of complications was similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Combined SGA and LGA embolization is safe and effective to treat obesity. Larger studies are needed to determine whether SGA + LGA embolization results in more significant weight loss than LGA embolization alone.

Bariatric arterial embolization in patients with body mass index ranging from 25 to 40 kg/m2: A systematic review & meta-analysis

The present review sought to evaluate by meta-analysis the efficacy of bariatric arterial embolization (BAE) in promoting weight loss in patients with body mass index (BMI) ranging from 25-40 kg/m2. This study was performed and reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines. A systematic literature search of MEDLINE, Embase Google Scholar, and World Health Organization Library database was done for studies evaluating BAE for promoting weight loss in patients with BMI ranging from 25-40 kg/ m2 published up to March 10, 2021. Primary outcome measure included weight loss after the embolisation procedure. Three single-arm studies comprising of a total of 28 patients (BMI: 25- 40 kg/m2) were found eligible for meta-analysis. All patients underwent embolization with either Embosphere microspheres or PVA particles. The predominant artery embolised was left gastric artery (in all patients). Additional arteries embolised included gastroepiploic artery (8 patients), or accessory left gastric artery (1 patient), or short gastric artery (1 patient). Pooled absolute mean weight loss was 7.854 kg (95% CI: 6.103-9.605). No significant statistical heterogeneity was detected (I2=51.75%, P=0.126) among pooled studies. In conclusion, limited single-arm studies report BAE as an effective, and relatively safe procedure for promoting weight loss in patients with BMI ranging from 25-40 kg/m2, although the number of patients included is very small. Initial results of BAE in promoting weight loss are promising with no major/severe complications reported; however, long term follow-up is required to see the sustainability of the effects.

Balancing Safety and Efficacy to Determine the Most Suitable Size of Imaging-Visible Embolic Microspheres for Bariatric Arterial Embolization in a Preclinical Model

OBJECTIVES

To identify the most suitable size of imaging-visible embolic agents with balanced safety and efficacy for bariatric arterial embolization (BAE) in a preclinical model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-seven pigs were divided into 3 cohorts. In Cohort I, 16 pigs were randomized to receive (n = 4 each) 40-100-μm microspheres in 1 or 2 fundal arteries, 70-340-μm radiopaque microspheres in 2 fundal arteries, or saline. In Cohort II, 3 pigs underwent renal arterial embolization with either custom-made 100-200-μm, 200-250-μm, 200-300-μm, or 300-400-μm radiopaque microspheres or Bead Block 300-500 μm with microsphere distribution assessed histologically. In Cohort III, 8 pigs underwent BAE in 2 fundal arteries with tailored 100-200-μm radiopaque microspheres (n = 5) or saline (n = 3).

RESULTS

In Cohort I, no significant differences in weight or ghrelin expression were observed between BAE and control animals. Moderate-to-severe gastric ulcerations were noted in all BAE animals. In Cohort II, renal embolization with 100-200-μm microspheres occluded vessels with a mean diameter of 139 μm ± 31, which is within the lower range of actual diameters of Bead Block 300-500 μm. In Cohort III, BAE with 100-200-μm microspheres resulted in significantly lower weight gain (42.3% ± 5.7% vs 51.6% ± 2.9% at 8 weeks; P = .04), fundal ghrelin cell density (16.1 ± 6.7 vs 23.6 ± 12.6; P = .045), and plasma ghrelin levels (1,709 pg/mL ± 172 vs 4,343 pg/mL ± 1,555; P < .01) compared with controls and superficial gastric ulcers (5/5).

CONCLUSIONS

In this preclinical model, tailored 100-200-μm microspheres were shown to be most suitable for BAE in terms of safety and efficacy.

EMBIO trial study protocol: left gastric artery embolisation for weight loss in patients living with obesity with a BMI 35-50 kg/m2

INTRODUCTION

Left gastric artery embolisation (LGAE) is a well-established treatment for major upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding when control is not established via upper GI endoscopy and recently has shown promising results for weight loss in small single arm studies. LGAE could be a treatment option in between our current tier-3 and tier-4 services for obesity. EMBIO is a National Institute for Health Research funded trial, a multicentre double-blinded randomised controlled trial between Imperial College National Health Service Trust and University College London Hospital, comparing LGAE versus Placebo procedure. The key aims of the trial is to evaluate LGAE efficacy on weight loss, its mechanism of action, safety profile and obesity-related comorbidities.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

76 participants will be recruited from the existing tier-3 database after providing informed consent. Key inclusion criteria include adults aged 18-70 with a body mass index 35-50 kg/m2 and appropriate anatomy of the left gastric artery and coeliac plexus on CT Angiogram. Key exclusion criteria included previous major abdominal and bariatric surgery, weight >150 kg, type 2 diabetes on any medications other than metformin and the use of weight modifying medications. Participants will undergo mechanistic visits 1 week prior to the intervention and 3, 6 and 12 months postintervention. Informed consent will be received from each participant and they will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to left gastric artery embolisation and placebo treatment. Blinding strategies include the use of moderate doses of sedation, visual and auditory isolation. All participants will enter a tier-3 weight management programme postintervention. The primary analysis will estimate the difference between the groups in the mean per cent weight loss at 12 months.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This trial shall be conducted in full conformity with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and all subsequent revisions. Local research ethics approval was granted by London-Central Research Ethics Committee, (Reference 19/LO/0509) on 11 October 2019. The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) issued the Letter of No Objection on 8 April 2022 (Reference CI/2022/0008/GB). The trial's development and progress are monitored by an independent trial steering committee and data monitoring and ethics committee. The researchers plan to disseminate results at conferences, in peer- reviewed journals as well as lay media and to patient organisations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN16158402.

Bariatric Artery Embolization for Obese Patients. An Up-to-Date Review

Overweight and obesity are one of public health's major problems in the world. Conservative treatment with exercise, diet and pharmacotherapy is often ineffective, especially in the long term. Bariatric surgery is the gold standard method for a sustained long-term weight loss. Recently the endovascular technique of bariatric artery embolization (BAE) has been studied as an obesity and overweight treatment, with promising results. The goal of this article is to analyze the rationale behind BAE and to provide an up-to-date analysis of its strengths and limitation in comparison with bariatric surgery as a treatment for obesity.

Interventional metabology: A review of bariatric arterial embolization and endovascular denervation for treating metabolic disorders

The rising prevalence of metabolic disorders such as obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) poses a major challenge to global health. Existing therapeutic approaches have limitations, and there is a need for new, safe, and less invasive treatments. Interventional metabolic therapy is a new addition to the treatment arsenal for metabolic disorders. This review focuses on two interventional techniques: bariatric arterial embolization (BAE) and endovascular denervation (EDN). BAE involves embolizing specific arteries feeding ghrelin-producing cells to suppress appetite and promote weight loss. EDN targets nerves that regulate metabolic organs to improve glycemic control in T2DM patients. We describe the current state of these techniques, their mechanisms of action, and the available safety and effectiveness data. We also propose a new territory called "Interventional Metabology" to encompass these and other interventional approaches to treating metabolic disorders.

Association Between Gut Hormones and Weight Change After Bariatric Arterial Embolization: Results from the BEAT Obesity Trial

PURPOSE

To evaluate associations of ghrelin, glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), and peptide YY 3-36 (PYY3-36) with weight change after bariatric arterial embolization (BAE).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Subgroup analysis of data collected during the BEAT Obesity Trial involving 7 participants with BMI > 40 who were embolized with 300- to 500-μm Embosphere Microspheres. Three participants were characterized as "responders" (top tertile of weight loss at each visit) and 4 as "non-responders" (bottom tertile of weight loss at each visit). Mean ± standard deviation participant age was 44 ± 11 years, and 6 of 7 participants were women. Participants were evaluated at baseline, 2 weeks, and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after BAE. After fasting, participants consumed a mixed meal test at each visit; blood samples were collected at 0, 15, 30, 60, 120, 180, and 240 min. Study outcome measures were changes in weight from baseline and plasma serum hormone levels.

RESULTS

Percentage change in ghrelin decreased significantly in non-responders at 60 and 120 min at 1 and 12 months (estimated difference between 60 vs. 0 min at 1 month: 69% [95% CI - 126%, - 13%]; estimated difference between 120 vs. 0 min at 12 months: - 131% (95% CI - 239%, - 23%]). Responders had significantly lower ghrelin and greater weight loss than non-responders at 6 and 12 months. GLP-1 and PYY3-36 levels did not differ between groups.

CONCLUSION

Participants with consistent weight loss throughout follow-up had lower ghrelin than non-responders, supporting decreased ghrelin as a mechanism underlying BAE-induced weight loss.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I

High-quality randomized trial or prospective study; testing of previously developed diagnostic criteria on consecutive patients; sensible costs and alternatives; values obtained from many studies with multiway sensitivity analyses; systematic review of Level I RCTs and Level I studies.

Weight Loss and Gastrointestinal Hormone Variation Caused by Gastric Artery Embolization: An Updated Analysis Study

OBJECTIVE

Many gastric artery embolizations (GAE) have been performed in recent years. We try to determine whether GAE caused weight loss by decreasing gastrointestinal hormone through the analysis of weight loss and gastrointestinal hormones changes.

METHODS

The PubMed and Medline databases, and the Cochrane Library, were searched using the following keywords. A total of 10 animal trials (n=144), 15 human trials (n=270) were included for analysis. After GAE, we mainly evaluated the changes in body weight loss (BWL) and body mass index (BMI), as well as metabolic indexes, such as blood glucose, lipids, and gastrointestinal hormones levels.

RESULTS

Animal subjects received either chemical or particle embolization, while human subjects only received particle embolization. In animal trials (growing period), the GAE group gained weight significantly slower than the sham-operated group, ghrelin levels decreased. In human trials, GAE brought more weight loss in the early stages, with a trend towards weight recovery after several months that was still lower than baseline levels. Besides weight loss, abnormal metabolic indicators, such as blood glucose and lipids were modified, and the quality of life (QOL) scores of obese patients improved. In addition, weight loss positively correlates with ghrelin.

CONCLUSION

GAE may help people lose weight and become a new minimally invasive and effective surgery for the treatment of modest obesity. Physiologic changes in gastrointestinal tract of gastrointestinal hormones level may be one reason for weight loss in GAE.

Identifying the Ideal Target Vessel Size for Bariatric Embolization: Histologic Analysis of Swine and Human Gastric Fundi

This study aimed to identify the ideal arteriole size to target in bariatric embolization, with the goal of maximizing weight loss efficacy while maintaining patient safety. Although all published clinical trials of bariatric embolization have used embolic microspheres that were at least 300 μm in diameter, optimal weight loss outcomes have been achieved safely in swine using 50-μm embolics. Human fundal remnants from bariatric surgery were compared with swine fundal sections after bariatric embolization with 50-μm embolic microspheres to assess the ideal fundal vessel size for bariatric embolization. In swine, the 50-μm embolic microspheres deposited in the luminal half of the submucosa with a mean arteriole size of 49 μm ± 30. The mean arteriole diameter in the corresponding submucosal layer of the human gastric fundi was 40 μm ± 30. These measurements may inform future clinical trials and direct the development of embolic agents for bariatric embolization.

Left gastric artery embolization for obesity treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of human and animal studies

PURPOSE

The main purpose of this systematic review was to reflect on recent literature on bariatric LGA embolization for obesity treatment and to compare this new procedure in human and animal studies.

METHODS

A systematic search of Scopus, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, and Google Scholar was performed to identify human and animal studies employing bariatric LGA embolization to treat obesity. As well, Cochrane's Q test and the I² statistic were utilized to determine heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Nine human and four animal studies recruiting a total of 118 cases (n = 78 patients and n = 40 animals) were included in analysis. All assessments on body mass index (BMI), weight, and ghrelin levels had been fulfilled based on before-after (human studies) and intervention-control designs (animal studies) using bariatric LGA embolization. The findings suggested that bariatric LGA embolization had significantly decreased BMI (mean difference (MD): - 2.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] - 3.74, - 1.58, P < 0.001) and weight (MD: - 8.69, 95% CI - 10.48, - 6.89, P < 0.001) in humans. Although overall pooled estimate showed no significant changes in ghrelin levels following this procedure (Hedges' g statistic: - 0.91, 95% CI - 1.83, 0.01, P = 0.05) in humans, a significant reduction was observed in animal studies (MD: - 756.56, 95% CI - 1098.79, - 414.33, P < 0.001) along with a significant drop in weight (MD: - 7.64, 95% CI - 13.73, - 1.54, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The present study concluded that ghrelin levels in humans had not been affected, although bariatric LGA embolization might significantly improve BMI and weight.

Interventional Radiology Obesity Therapeutics: Proceedings from the Society of Interventional Radiology Foundation Research Consensus Panel

The Society of Interventional Radiology Foundation commissioned a Research Consensus Panel to establish a research agenda on "Obesity Therapeutics" in interventional radiology (IR). The meeting convened a multidisciplinary group of physicians and scientists with expertise in obesity therapeutics. The meeting was intended to review current evidence on obesity therapies, familiarize attendees with the regulatory evaluation process, and identify research deficiencies in IR bariatric interventions, with the goal of prioritizing future high-quality research that would move the field forward. The panelists agreed that a weight loss of >8%-10% from baseline at 6-12 months is a desirable therapeutic endpoint for future IR weight loss therapies. The final consensus on the highest priority research was to design a blinded randomized controlled trial of IR weight loss interventions versus sham control arms, with patients receiving behavioral therapy.

Endovascular Bariatric Surgery as Novel Minimally Invasive Technique for Weight Management in the Morbidly Obese: Review of the Literature

Nowadays, obesity represents one of the most unresolved global pandemics, posing a critical health issue in developed countries. According to the World Health Organization, its prevalence has tripled since 1975, reaching a prevalence of 13% of the world population in 2016. Indeed, as obesity increases worldwide, novel strategies to fight this condition are of the utmost importance to reduce obese-related morbidity and overall mortality related to its complications. Early experimental and initial clinical data have suggested that endovascular bariatric surgery (EBS) may be a promising technique to reduce weight and hormonal imbalance in the obese population. Compared to open bariatric surgery and minimally invasive surgery (MIS), EBS is much less invasive, well tolerated, with a shorter recovery time, and is probably cost-saving. However, there are still several technical aspects to investigate before EBS can be routinely offered to all obese patients. Further prospective studies and eventually a randomized trial comparing open bariatric surgery vs. EBS are needed, powered for clinically relevant outcomes, and with adequate follow-up. Yet, EBS may already appear as an appealing alternative treatment for weight management and cardiovascular prevention in morbidly obese patients at high surgical risk.

Bariatric Embolization in the Treatment of Patients with a Body Mass Index Between 30 and 39.9 kg/m2 (Obesity Class I and II) and Metabolic Syndrome, a Pilot Study

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate the efficacy and clinical safety of bariatric arterial embolization (BAE) in adults with body mass index (BMI) between 30 and 39.9 kg/m² and metabolic syndrome (MS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between March and August 2018, ten female participants between 21 and 48-years-old, median BMI of 36.37 ± 2.58 kg/m² and MS were enrolled in this prospective trial. We embolized the fundal branches from the left gastric and other artery sources, which resulted in embolization of at least two arteries in 9 out 10 participants. Six months after bariatric embolization, efficacy was assessed by changes in total body weight (TBW), ghrelin and Homeostatic Model Assessment-Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) levels and by changes in quality of life (QOL) and in binge eating scale (BES) scores. Safety was assessed by the identification of any related complications, including gastric ulcers, screened by gastrointestinal endoscopy, performed before and one week and one month after BAE.

RESULTS

Six months after embolization, TBW decreased by 6.8% (6.22 kg ± 3.6;p = .01), serum ghrelin dropped from 25.39 pg/ml ± 10.63 to 17.1 ± 8.07 (p = 0.01), and HOMA-IR decreased from 7.29 ± 5.66 to 3.73 ± 1.99 (p = 0.01). The QOL scores improved from 59.64 ± 5.59 to 69.02 ± 11.97 (p < 0.05) and in the BES from 21.50 ± 8.89 to 9.60 ± 4.40 (p = 0.01). Endoscopy revealed symptomatic gastric ulcers in two participants, which had healed without sequelae. In one participant, ultrasound revealed an asymptomatic focal arterial thrombus at the left distal radial artery puncture site.

CONCLUSION

BAE is effective in reducing weight, insulin resistance and ghrelin levels and improving BES and QOL scores in patients with class I and II obesity and MS, with no major complications.

Bariatric Arterial Embolization with Calibrated Radiopaque Microspheres and an Antireflux Catheter Suppresses Weight Gain and Appetite-Stimulating Hormones in Swine

PURPOSE

To examine safety and efficacy of bariatric arterial embolization (BAE) with x-ray-visible embolic microspheres (XEMs) and an antireflux catheter in swine.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

BAE with selective infusion of XEMs (n = 6) or saline (n = 4, control) into gastric fundal arteries was performed under x-ray guidance. Weight and plasma hormone levels were measured at baseline and weekly for 4 weeks after embolization. Cone-beam CT images were acquired immediately after embolization and weekly for 4 weeks. Hormone-expressing cells in the stomach were assessed by immunohistochemical staining.

RESULTS

BAE pigs lost weight 1 week after embolization followed by significantly impaired weight gain relative to control animals (14.3% vs 20.9% at 4 weeks, P = .03). Plasma ghrelin levels were significantly lower in BAE pigs than in control animals (1,221.6 pg/mL vs 1,706.2 pg/mL at 4 weeks, P < .01). XEMs were visible on x-ray and cone-beam CT during embolization, and radiopacity persisted over 4 weeks (165.5 HU at week 1 vs 158.5 HU at week 4, P = .9). Superficial mucosal ulcerations were noted in 1 of 6 BAE animals. Ghrelin-expressing cell counts were significantly lower in the gastric fundus (17.7 vs 36.8, P < .00001) and antrum (24.2 vs 46.3, P < .0001) of BAE pigs compared with control animals. Gastrin-expressing cell counts were markedly reduced in BAE pigs relative to control animals (98.5 vs 127.0, P < .02). Trichrome staining demonstrated significantly more fibrosis in BAE animals compared with control animals (13.8% vs 8.7%, P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

XEMs enabled direct visualization of embolic material during and after embolization. BAE with XEMs and antireflux microcatheters was safe and effective.

Revisiting the Ghrelin Changes Following Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery

Since the description of ghrelin in 1999, several studies have dug into the effects of this hormone and its relationship with bariatric surgery. While some aspects are still unresolved, a clear connection between ghrelin and the changes after metabolic surgery have been established. Besides weight loss, a significant amelioration in obesity-related comorbidities following surgery has also been reported. These changes in patients occur in the early postoperative period, before the weight loss appears, so that amelioration may be mainly due to hormonal changes. The purpose of this review is to go through the current body of knowledge of ghrelin's physiology, as well as to update and clarify the changes that take place in ghrelin concentrations following bariatric/metabolic surgery together with their potential consolidation to outcomes.

Gastric artery embolization: studying the effects of catheter type and injection method on microsphere distributions within a benchtop arterial model

Aims

The objective of the study is to investigate the effect of catheter type and injection method on microsphere distributions, specifically vessel targeting accuracy.

Materials and methods

The study utilized three catheter types (a standard end-hole micro-catheter, a Surefire anti-reflux catheter, and an Endobar occlusion balloon catheter) and both manual and computer-controlled injection schemes. A closed-loop, dynamically pressurized surrogate arterial system was assembled to replicate arterial flow for bariatric embolization procedures. Four vessel branches immediately distal to the injection site were targeted for embolization. Embolic microspheres were injected into the model using these  three catheter types and both manual and computer-controlled injections.

Results

Across all injection methods, the catheter effect on the proportion of microspheres to target vessels (vs. non-target vessels) was significant (p = 0.005). The catheter effect on the number of non-target vessels embolized was nearly significant (p = 0.059). Across all catheter types, the injection method effect was not statistically significant for either of two outcome measures (percent microspheres to target vessels: p = 0.265, number of non-target vessels embolized: p = 0.148).

Conclusion

Catheter type had a significant effect on targeting accuracy across all injection methods. The Endobar catheter exhibited a higher targeting accuracy in pairwise comparisons with the other two injection catheters across all injection schemes and when considering the Endobar catheter with the manifold injection method vs. each of the catheters with the manual injection method; the differences were significant in three of four analyses. The injection method effect was not statistically significant across all catheter types and when considering the Endobar catheter/Endobar manifold combination vs. Endobar catheter injections with manual and pressure-replicated methods.

Future of Bariatric Embolization: A Review of Up-to-date Clinical Trials

Obesity is a significant health issue with an overall rise in mortality; it has multiple risk factors, including hormonal effects, which play a significant role in the balance of food intake and weight gain. Ghrelin is an anabolic hormone secreted from stomach fundus and plays a significant role in this regulation. Management of obesity involves multiple interventions, including lifestyle adjustment, pharmacotherapy, and bariatric surgery. Bariatric embolization is a relatively new procedure; several animal studies show that embolization of the left gastric artery reduces serum ghrelin and induces weight loss.  Also, several clinical studies were conducted in the past ten years which have shown bariatric embolization's effectiveness in inducing weight loss: a meta-analysis of 47 patients included in six different clinical studies of left gastric artery embolization resulted in 8% total weight loss from baseline body weight. Many studies also show this procedure's effect on lowering the HgA1C level and lipid profile. Clinical studies mostly reported minor adverse effects such as transient abdominal discomfort, nausea and vomiting, gastric ulcers, and major adverse effects were uncommon, suggesting the procedure is well tolerated. It may be an alternative line of management in patients who are not suitable candidates for bariatric surgery. Although future clinical studies will provide an answer to several questions like the exact effects of the procedure on diabetes and metabolic syndrome, future studies are also needed to establish particular guidelines to match different patient characteristics with their optimal procedural techniques and pre- and post-procedure evaluation tests.

Bariatric Embolization: A Narrative Review of Clinical Data From Human Trials

Bariatric arterial embolization (BAE) is a novel technique that is investigated as an alternative, often supplementary, method for weight management. BAE reduces blood perfusion to the gastric fundus, and thus, reduces the production of appetite-inducing hormones. No randomized controlled trial has evaluated the efficacy of BAE to date. Available evidence from published studies include retrospective evaluations of patients undergoing left gastric artery embolization for gastrointestinal bleeding, and early prospective, single-arm clinical trials. Review of clinical data from human trials suggest an average weight loss of about 8-9 kg (ranging 7.6-22.0 kg), corresponding to 8-9% (ranging 4.8-17.2%) of the patients' baseline weight. Common complications include superficial gastric ulcers. Though uncommon, gastric perforation and splenic infarct are important major complication that may arise after left gastric artery embolization. Overall, BAE is an effective, relatively safe procedure that may be associated with clinically significant weight loss in patients with obesity.

Rationale and Preclinical Data Supporting Bariatric Arterial Embolization

The prevalence of obesity is increasing globally, leading to significantly increased morbidity, mortality, and health care costs. However, there is a lack of effective treatment options that can treat patients with obesity less invasively than with bariatric surgery. Bariatric arterial embolization (BAE) is an image-guided, minimally invasive, percutaneous procedure that is currently being investigated in preclinical animal models and early clinical trials. If successful, BAE may represent a viable interventional approach for obesity treatment. The purpose of this article is to introduce the physiological and anatomical rationale for BAE, review techniques involved in performing BAE for weight modulation, and provide up-to-date preclinical evidence that supports the translation of BAE into patients.

Radial Approach for Left Gastric Artery Angiography and Embolization for the Treatment of Obesity: Technical Considerations

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Bariatric embolization of the left gastric artery (LGA) is being investigated as a technique to induce substantial weight loss in obese patients. Radial access is associated with less vascular complications than femoral access, especially in patients with severe obesity. We sought to assess the feasibility, safety and technical challenges of LGA angiography through radial access.

METHODS/MATERIALS

Patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) and obesity (BMI > 30 kg/m²) referred for diagnostic catheterization and/or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were eligible. After completion of diagnostic and/or PCI, selective cannulation of celiac artery was performed and images of the LGA were taken from multiple views. Detailed procedural parameters such as procedure time, contrast volume and radiation data as well as anatomical variations were assessed.

RESULTS

Between February and December 2018, we successfully achieved 50 selective angiographies of celiac artery from 54 enrolled patients (92.6%) and LGA was optimally visualized in 47/50 (97%) of cases. Right radial access was used in 50 cases. Mean age was 63.9 ± 8.0 years and 74% were men. Median BMI was 34.4 kg/m² [32.2-39.4]. The median procedural time was 7 [5-10] minutes, contrast volume was 41 ml [33-63], fluoroscopy time was 160 [103-248] seconds and radiation exposure was 3125 [1906-4735] Gy.cm². No complications were noted. The mean difficulty of the procedure on a visual analogue scale was 4/10.

CONCLUSIONS

LGA angiography via transradial approach was feasible in the large majority of CAD patients with obesity. No safety issues were encountered.

Bariatric Embolization of Arteries for the Treatment of Obesity (BEAT Obesity) Trial: Results at 1 Year

Background Bariatric embolization is a new endovascular procedure to treat patients with obesity. However, the safety and efficacy of bariatric embolization are unknown. Purpose To evaluate the safety and efficacy of bariatric embolization in severely obese adults at up to 12 months after the procedure. Materials and Methods For this prospective study (NCT0216512 on ClinicalTrials.gov ), 20 participants (16 women) aged 27-68 years (mean ± standard deviation, 44 years ± 11) with mean body mass index of 45 ± 4.1 were enrolled at two institutions from June 2014 to February 2018. Transarterial embolization of the gastric fundus was performed using 300- to 500-µm embolic microspheres. Primary end points were 30-day adverse events and weight loss at up to 12 months. Secondary end points at up to 12 months included technical feasibility, health-related quality of life (Short Form-36 Health Survey ([SF-36]), impact of weight on quality of life (IWQOL-Lite), and hunger or appetite using a visual assessment scale. Analysis of outcomes was performed by using one-sample t tests and other exploratory statistics. Results Bariatric embolization was performed successfully for all participants with no major adverse events. Eight participants had a total of 11 minor adverse events. Mean excess weight loss was 8.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.3%, 10%; P < .001) at 1 month, 11.5% (95% CI: 8.7%, 14%; P < .001) at 3 months, 12.8% (95% CI: 8.3%, 17%; P < .001) at 6 months, and 11.5% (95% CI: 6.8%, 16%; P < .001) at 12 months. From baseline to 12 months, mean SF-36 scores increased (mental component summary, from 46 ± 11 to 50 ± 10, P = .44; physical component summary, from 46 ± 8.0 to 50 ± 9.3, P = .15) and mean IWQOL-Lite scores increased from 57 ± 18 to 77 ± 18 (P < .001). Hunger or appetite decreased for 4 weeks after embolization and increased thereafter, without reaching pre-embolization levels. Conclusion Bariatric embolization is well tolerated in severely obese adults, inducing appetite suppression and weight loss for up to 12 months. Published under a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Anastomotic leakage with abscess: Neglected severe complication of bariatric surgery for obesity: A case report

•

Nowadays, postoperative stay is too short for bariatric operation.

•

Nowadays, postoperative nutritional support is insufficient.

•

Post-operative fever is the sign of poor healing or anastomotic leakage.

Introduction

Presently, bariatric surgery is a widespread treatment for obesity and its co-morbidities. Comprehensive evidence from outcomes of bariatric surgery supported that the surgery is safe and effective. However, we should be aware of the multiple risks of bariatric surgery, especially the severe infection at the operation site.

Case presentation

A 30-year-old woman was hospitalized for anastomotic leakage with abscess after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. After 53 days of percutaneous drainage, absolute diet fasting, parenteral nutrition and culture based antibiotics etc., she was discharged for recovery.

Discussion

Theoretically, malabsorption and early diet will increase the risk of anastomotic leakage, but this problem is seldom to be mentioned in related articles. Moreover, it seems to be common that people received bariatric surgery had a relatively short post-operative stay.

Conclusion

Essential nutritional support, longer post-operative hospital stay and strict follow-up are necessary to minimize this complication.

Future of IR: Emerging Techniques, Looking to the Future…and Learning from the Past

Innovation has been the cornerstone of interventional radiology since the early years of the founders, with a multitude of new therapeutic approaches developed over the last 50 years. What is the future holding for us? This article presents an overview of the in-coming developments that are catching on at this moment, particularly focusing on three items: the new applications of existing techniques, particularly embolotherapy and interventional oncology; the cutting-edge devices; the imaging technologies at the forefront of the image-guidance. Besides this, clinical vision and patient relation remain crucial for the future of the discipline.

Bariatric Arterial Embolization for Obesity: A Review of Early Clinical Evidence

Obesity is a worldwide public health epidemic that leads to increased morbidity, mortality, and cost burden to health care. Although bariatric surgery has been recognized as a standard invasive treatment for obesity, it is accompanied by relatively high morbidity and cost burden, as well as limited treatment outcome. Therefore, alternative treatments with lower morbidity and cost for surgery that target patients who are obese, but not morbidly obese, are needed. A minimally invasive trans-catheter procedure, named bariatric arterial embolization or bariatric embolization (BAE), has been identified as a potential solution, based on its safety and preliminary efficacy profiles. The purpose of this review is to introduce up-to-date clinical data and discuss future directions for BAE for the treatment of obesity.

Bariatric Arterial Embolization: Effect of Microsphere Size on the Suppression of Fundal Ghrelin Expression and Weight Change in a Swine Model

Purpose To determine whether microsphere size effects ghrelin expression and weight gain after selective bariatric arterial embolization (BAE) in swine. Materials and Methods BAE was performed in 10 swine by using smaller (100-300 μm; n = 5) or larger (300-500 μm; n = 5) calibrated microspheres into gastric arteries. Nine control pigs underwent a sham procedure. Weight and fasting plasma ghrelin levels were measured at baseline and weekly for 16 weeks. Ghrelin-expressing cells (GECs) in the stomach were assessed by using immunohistochemical staining and analyzed by using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Results In pigs treated with smaller microspheres, mean weight gain at 16 weeks (106.9% ± 15.0) was less than in control pigs (131.9% ± 11.6) (P < .001). Mean GEC density was lower in the gastric fundus (14.8 ± 6.3 vs 25.0 ± 6.9, P < .001) and body (27.5 ± 12.3 vs 37.9 ± 11.8, P = .004) but was not significantly different in the gastric antrum (28.2 ± 16.3 vs 24.3 ± 11.6, P = .84) and duodenum (9.2 ± 3.8 vs 8.7 ± 2.9, P = .66) versus in control pigs. BAE with larger microspheres failed to suppress weight gain or GECs in any stomach part compared with results in control swine. Plasma ghrelin levels were similar between BAE pigs and control pigs, regardless of microsphere size. Week 1 endoscopic evaluation for gastric ulcers revealed none in control pigs, five ulcers in five pigs embolized by using smaller microspheres, and three ulcers in five pigs embolized by using larger microspheres. Conclusion In bariatric arterial embolization, smaller microspheres rather than larger microspheres showed greater weight gain suppression and fundal ghrelin expression with more gastric ulceration in a swine model. © RSNA, 2018.

SAGES review of endoscopic and minimally invasive bariatric interventions: a review of endoscopic and non-surgical bariatric interventions

BACKGROUND

With obesity continuing as a global epidemic and therapeutic technologies advancing, several novel endoscopic and minimally invasive interventions will likely become available as treatment options. With improved technologies and different treatment strategies, as well as different patient populations being targeted, there will be greater application in the treatment armamentarium of specialists dedicated to treating obesity. We sought to review the existing technology and provide a review.

METHODS

Literature review was carried out for endoscopic and minimally invasive devices. Some of these products are not FDA approved, so limited data are available in their review.

RESULTS

A summary of the device and data currently available on weight loss and safety profile is provided. Several products are in clinical trials or will be soon. Some of the technology has limited data and companies will be submitting their results for FDA evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

The obesity epidemic and associated weight-related diseases represent a tremendous burden to health care practitioners. As such, a multi-modal and progressive approach, with data and outcomes examined, is likely the best and most comprehensive method to care for these patients. SAGES endorses the benefits of minimally invasive and endoscopic approaches in the treatment of obesity and its related co-morbidities.