Perioperative Antiemetic Therapy for Fast-Track Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery

Association between operative position and postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

Bariatric surgery is one of the most effective ways to treat morbid obesity, and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is one of the common complications after bariatric surgery. At present, the mechanism of the high incidence of PONV after weight-loss surgery has not been clearly explained, and this study aims to investigate the effect of surgical position on PONV in patients undergoing bariatric surgery.

AIM

To explore the effect of the operative position during bariatric surgery on PONV.

METHODS

Data from obese patients, who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in the authors’ hospital between June 2020 and February 2022 were divided into 2 groups and retrospectively analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression analysis and the t-test were used to study the influence of operative position on PONV.

RESULTS

There were 15 cases of PONV in the supine split-leg group (incidence rate, 50%) and 11 in the supine group (incidence rate, 36.7%) (P = 0.297). The mean operative duration in the supine split-leg group was 168.23 ± 46.24 minutes and 140.60 ± 32.256 minutes in the supine group (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that operative position was not an independent risk factor for PONV (odds ratio = 1.192, 95% confidence interval: 0.376-3.778, P = 0.766).

CONCLUSION

Operative position during LSG may affect PONV; however, the difference in the incidence of PONV was not statistically significant. Operative position should be carefully considered for obese patients before surgery.

Efficacy and Safety of Paragastric Neural Blockade in Controlling Pain, Nausea, and Vomiting After Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

There are difficulties in controlling the symptoms of pain, nausea, and vomiting after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PGNB on pain and nausea and vomiting in the early postoperative period in patients who underwent LSG.

METHODS

In this prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind study, the patients were divided into two equally formed groups: patients who underwent PGNB after LSG and the control group. Postoperative pain symptoms were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) scores, and nausea and vomiting symptoms were evaluated using the postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) scores.

RESULTS

The study was completed with 90 patients, 45 patients in each group. The VAS scores measured at postoperative hours 1, 6, and 12 were statistically significantly lower in the PGNB group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the 24th hour VAS scores. The mean PONV scores of the PGNB and control groups were 0.47 ± 0.89 and 1.67 ± 1.95, respectively, revealing a significantly higher value for the controls. The mean time to first mobilization in the postoperative period was significantly shorter in the PGNB group. Upon the evaluation of patient satisfaction, it was determined that the satisfaction score of the PGNB group was significantly higher.

CONCLUSIONS

PGNB is an effective and safe method for managing pain, nausea, and vomiting that occur in the early period after LSG.

Development and Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery Protocol for Bariatric Patients in a Third World Environment

Introduction: An applicable and reproducible enhanced recovery protocol was developed and implemented to improve our outcomes in a third-world environment. Methods: We compared the results obtained prospectively. The group treated before the application of the enhanced recovery protocol was called usual care (UC) and included all bariatric surgeries operated on between 2014 and 2017. The new protocol was applied between 2017 and 2019 including all operated patients, and this group was called Fast Track (FT). The variables analyzed were the length of stay, readmissions, and complications recorded during the first 30 days. We also analyzed the milligrams of morphine used by each patient, and a cost analysis was performed. Results: During the study period, 816 patients were studied. Of these, 385 (47.2%) belonged to the UC group and 431 (52.8%) to the FT group. The mean hospital stay was 58.5 hours (UC) versus 40.3 hours (FT) (P = .0001). When comparing the global morbidity of both groups, we did not find significant differences (P = .47). There was also no statistically significant difference when comparing major complications (P = .79). No mortality was recorded. Morphine indication reported a statistically significant difference that favored FT. Costs were significantly higher in UC than in FT (P < .0001). Conclusions: We believe that the implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol in bariatric surgery is a reliable measure and can be implemented even in an underdevelopment environment enlarging the benefit for patients.

Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Management of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (a Retrospective Multicentric Study)

PURPOSE

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a frequent unappealing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) sequel. The study's purpose was to determine the prevalence, risk factors of PONV, and management of PONV after LSG.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This multicenter retrospective study included patients with morbid obesity who had LSG between January 2022 and April 2023. The age range for LSG was 16 to 65 years, and the eligibility requirements included morbid obesity according to international guidelines.

RESULTS

PONV was experienced by 74.6% of patients who underwent LSG at 6 h postoperative. Multivariate analysis revealed that female gender, smokers, preoperative GERD, gastropexy, and severity of pain were found to be independent risk variables of the development of PONV, while antral preservation, opioid-free analgesia, and intraoperative combined analgesia were found to be independent protective variables against the development of PONV. Combined intravenous ondansetron and metoclopramide improved 92.6% of patients who developed PONV. Dexamethasone and antihistamines drugs are given for 42 cases with persistent PONV after using intravenous ondansetron and metoclopramide. Pain management postoperatively by opioid-free analgesia managed PONV. Helicobacter pylori status has no role in the development of PONV after LSG.

CONCLUSION

Female gender, smoking, presence of preoperative GERD, gastropexy, and severity of pain were found to be independent risk variables of the development of PONV, while antral preservation, opioid-free analgesia, and intraoperative combined analgesia were observed to be independent protective factors against the occurrence of PONV. Combined intravenous ondansetron and metoclopramide improved PONV. Dexamethasone and antihistamines drugs are given for persistent PONV.

Effects of ondansetron, metoclopramide and granisetron on perioperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergone bariatric surgery: a randomized clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

Post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a common problem after sleeve gastrectomy. In recent years, following the increase in the number of such operations, special attention has been paid to preventing PONV. Additionally, several prophylaxis methods have been developed, including enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) and preventive antiemetics. Nevertheless, PONV has not been completely eliminated, and the clinicians are trying to reduce the incidence of PONV yet.

METHODS

After successful ERAS implementation, patients were divided into five groups, including control and experimental groups. Metoclopramide (MA), ondansetron (OA), granisetron (GA), and a combination of metoclopramide and ondansetron (MO) were used as antiemetics for each group. The frequency of PONV during the first and second days of admission was recorded using a subjective PONV scale.

RESULTS

A total of 130 patients were enrolled in this study. The MO group showed a lower incidence of PONV (46.1%) compared to the control group (53.8%) and other groups. Furthermore, the MO group did not require rescue antiemetics, however, one-third of control cases used rescue antiemetics (0 vs. 34%).

CONCLUSION

Using the combination of metoclopramide and ondansetron is recommended as the antiemetic regimen for the reduction of PONV after sleeve gastrectomy. This combination is more helpful when implemented alongside ERAS protocols.

Drug-Related Problems in Bariatric Surgery: a Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

With the rapid increase of bariatric surgery worldwide, drug-related problems (DRPs) in this area seem to be rising. This study aimed to investigate the incidence and characteristics of DRPs in patients undergoing bariatric surgery.

METHODS

Medication records for patients who underwent bariatric surgery were analysed retrospectively between January 2019 and December 2020 in our center. We classified and analysed DRPs using the Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe classification (PCNE version 9.0). Rating severity of these DRPs was based on the National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention (NCC MERP) classification. Continuous variables were analysed by Student's t-test, and categorical variables were compared using the chi-square test. One-way ANOVA was used to compare the numbers of DRPs.

RESULTS

Totally 347 patients were reviewed, and 760 DRPs were identified with an average of 2.19 ± 1.36 DRPs for each patient. The most common DRPs were problems related to perioperative antibiotics accounting for 29.47%, 25.62% and 14.34% for hepatoprotection and proton-pump inhibitors (PPI), respectively. The leading causes of DRPs were inappropriate medications for antibiotics, hepatoprotection, ancillary drugs and PPI. 89.34% of the DRPs were rated at severity categories B-D (which means potential adverse reactions that may occur), whereas 10.66% were rated as categories E-H. There were relations between DRPs and older (32.22 ± 9.29 vs. 29.11 ± 6.53 years), fewer concomitant surgeries (1.89 ± 1.25 vs. 2.99 ± 1.31), longer postoperative fasting time (PFT) (1.18 ± 0.55 vs. 1.06 ± 0.24 days) and more comorbidities (6.71 ± 2.63 vs. 5.23 ± 1.46) (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of DRPs in the perioperative period of bariatric surgery is high. Patients with fewer concomitant surgeries and longer PFT are prone to DRPs. It is necessary for clinical pharmacists to participate in medication monitoring and reviewing to facilitate enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery.

Effect of intravenous scopolamine before stapling, on postoperative nausea and vomiting in sleeve gastrectomy patients: a randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a common complication of general anesthesia that is further potentiated in an obese patient undergoing a bariatric procedure. Literature shows trials of myriad of drugs used alone or in combination, as a prophylaxis for this cohort of patients with varied benefits.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to determine the effect of intravenous scopolamine prior to stapling in obese patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy.

METHODOLOGY

A prospective randomized controlled trial of consecutive patients with BMI > 35 kg/m², undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) was performed after approval of the hospital's ethical committee, explanation of trial to the patients and obtaining a consent. Patients were randomized into two groups; patients receiving intravenous scopolamine just before firing first stapler (Group 1) and patients receiving placebo (Group 2). Primary outcome parameter was PONV. The secondary outcome parameters were use of rescue antiemetic and time to oral intake.

RESULTS

In our study, out of 100 cases of patients undergoing LSG, 50 received scopolamine before stapling and 50 were assigned to the control group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of PONV. The group receiving scopolamine had lesser use of rescue antiemetic but no difference in time to oral intake.

CONCLUSION

We concluded that incidence of PONV in obese patients undergoing LSG is not affected by scopolamine. Further trials are needed to validate the results.

Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Bariatric Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations: A 2021 Update

Background

This is the second updated Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society guideline, presenting a consensus for optimal perioperative care in bariatric surgery and providing recommendations for each ERAS item within the ERAS® protocol.

Methods

A principal literature search was performed utilizing the Pubmed, EMBASE, Cochrane databases and ClinicalTrials.gov through December 2020, with particular attention paid to meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials and large prospective cohort studies. Selected studies were examined, reviewed and graded according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. After critical appraisal of these studies, the group of authors reached consensus regarding recommendations.

Results

The quality of evidence for many ERAS interventions remains relatively low in a bariatric setting and evidence-based practices may need to be extrapolated from other surgeries.

Conclusion

A comprehensive, updated evidence-based consensus was reached and is presented in this review by the ERAS® Society.

Prophylactic Administration of Diphenhydramine/Acetaminophen and Ondansetron Reduced Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting and Pain Following Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Randomized Controlled Trial

PURPOSE

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and pain following bariatric surgery are problematic and affect the outcome of patients. Intraoperative multimodal antiemetic prophylaxis is essential to improve postoperative outcomes. This study investigated the effect of adding diphenhydramine to acetaminophen and ondansetron in reducing postoperative nausea and vomiting and pain following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty-two patients scheduled for LSG were assigned to receive a single preinduction dose of diphenhydramine 0.4 mg/kg VI (D group) in addition to acetaminophen 1g and ondansetron 4 mg IV at the end of surgery and just acetaminophen 1 g and ondansetron 4 mg IV (C group) in a randomized, double-blind trial. PONV was assessed in recovery and 24 hours after surgery in the ward. Postoperative pain, analgesic requirements, and patients' level of sedation were also assessed.

RESULTS

The PONV rates in the recovery of the D group and the C group were 30% and 56% (P = .001). It also had a more significant reduction in the D group than in the C group in the first 24 h after surgery (40% vs. 66%). The severity of pain score and level of sedation and analgesic requirements was significantly reduced in this period in the D group.

CONCLUSION

Prophylactic diphenhydramine 0.4 mg/kg at the induction of general anesthesia in combination with acetaminophen 1 g and ondansetron 4 mg at the end of surgery reduced the incidence of PONV and postoperative severity of pain in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

Antiemetic Prophylaxis and Anesthetic Approaches to Reduce Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Bariatric Surgery Patients: a Systematic Review

While guidelines exist for the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in the general surgical setting, there are no established guidelines for the prevention or treatment of PONV in bariatric patients, in whom PONV contributes significantly to perioperative morbidity and hospital resource utilization. This systematic review found that the multimodal pharmacological approach to PONV prevention recommended in current guidelines for high-risk surgical patients is appropriate for the bariatric subset. This includes multi-agent antiemetic prophylaxis with dexamethasone and one or more agents from other classes, and opioid-free total intravenous anesthesia, though the advantages of the latter need further evaluation. There remains a need for a standardized validated instrument to assess PONV in the bariatric setting.

Preventing Nausea and Vomiting After Bariatric Surgery: Is the Apfel Risk Prediction Score Enough to Guide Prophylaxis?

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a frequent side effect in patients undergoing bariatric procedures. The simplified Apfel score is an attractive and frequently used tool to assess PONV risk in the general surgical population. Despite applying the recommendations based on the Apfel risk prediction score, several studies show that up to 82% of patients undergoing metabolic and bariatric surgery suffer from PONV in the PACU. A combination of multiple antiemetic drugs of different pharmacologic classes targeting a variety of receptors in addition to an intraoperative opioid-free TIVA technique should be considered in high-risk patients.

A Comprehensive Approach for the Prevention of Nausea and Vomiting Following Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) following sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is a common occurrence. The effect of specific interventions in PONV prevention within enhanced recovery pathways remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a comprehensive approach for the prevention of PONV on patient outcomes and hospital resource utilization.

METHODS

A prospective randomized trial was conducted for patients undergoing SG. The intervention group received aprepitant and transdermal scopolamine preoperatively followed by ondansetron and dexamethasone intraoperatively, with total intravenous anesthesia. The control group received inhalational anesthetic and two intraoperative antiemetics without preoperative prophylaxis. The primary endpoint was a PONV-related delay in hospital discharge.

RESULTS

Eighty-three patients completed the study (41 in the intervention and 42 in the control group). Eighty-nine percent of patients were discharged home on the first postoperative day. Four patients in the control group and none in the intervention group experienced a PONV-related delay in discharge (9.5% vs 0, p = 0.119). Intervention patients reported significantly lower PONV scores at all in-hospital time points examined (p = 0.0392 for verbal scores and p < 0.0001 for Rhodes Index) and significantly higher self-rated quality of recovery at 24 h (Quality of Recovery-15 instrument, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

A multilevel approach to PONV leads to significantly lower severity of PONV and improved self-reported quality of recovery, compared with control. PONV-related readmissions, ED visits, and discharge delays were uncommon within the overall enhanced recovery cohort.

Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Perioperative Nutrition, Metabolic, and Nonsurgical Support of Patients Undergoing Bariatric Procedures - 2019 Update: Cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology, The Obesity Society, American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, Obesity Medicine Association, and American Society of Anesthesiologists

OBJECTIVE

The development of these updated clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) was commissioned by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE), The Obesity Society (TOS), American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS), Obesity Medicine Association (OMA), and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Boards of Directors in adherence with the AACE 2017 protocol for standardized production of CPGs, algorithms, and checklists.

METHODS

Each recommendation was evaluated and updated based on new evidence from 2013 to the present and subjective factors provided by experts.

RESULTS

New or updated topics in this CPG include: contextualization in an adiposity-based chronic disease complications-centric model, nuance-based and algorithm/checklist-assisted clinical decision-making about procedure selection, novel bariatric procedures, enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery protocols, and logistical concerns (including cost factors) in the current health care arena. There are 85 numbered recommendations that have updated supporting evidence, of which 61 are revised and 12 are new. Noting that there can be multiple recommendation statements within a single numbered recommendation, there are 31 (13%) Grade A, 42 (17%) Grade B, 72 (29%) Grade C, and 101 (41%) Grade D recommendations. There are 858 citations, of which 81 (9.4%) are evidence level (EL) 1 (highest), 562 (65.5%) are EL 2, 72 (8.4%) are EL 3, and 143 (16.7%) are EL 4 (lowest).

CONCLUSIONS

Bariatric procedures remain a safe and effective intervention for higher-risk patients with obesity. Clinical decision-making should be evidence based within the context of a chronic disease. A team approach to perioperative care is mandatory, with special attention to nutritional and metabolic issues.

Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutrition, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of patients undergoing bariatric procedures - 2019 update: cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology, The Obesity Society, American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery, Obesity Medicine Association, and American Society of Anesthesiologists

OBJECTIVE

The development of these updated clinical practice guidelines (CPG) was commissioned by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, The Obesity Society, the American Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, the Obesity Medicine Association, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists boards of directors in adherence to the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists 2017 protocol for standardized production of CPG, algorithms, and checklists.

METHODS

Each recommendation was evaluated and updated based on new evidence from 2013 to the present and subjective factors provided by experts.

RESULTS

New or updated topics in this CPG include contextualization in an adiposity-based, chronic disease complications-centric model, nuance-based, and algorithm/checklist-assisted clinical decision-making about procedure selection, novel bariatric procedures, enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery protocols, and logistical concerns (including cost factors) in the current healthcare arena. There are 85 numbered recommendations that have updated supporting evidence, of which 61 are revised and 12 are new. Noting that there can be multiple recommendation statements within a single numbered recommendation, there are 31 (13%) Grade A, 42 (17%) Grade B, 72 (29%) Grade C, and 101 (41%) Grade D recommendations. There are 858 citations, of which 81 (9.4%) are evidence level (EL) 1 (highest), 562 (65.5%) are EL 2, 72 (8.4%) are EL 3, and 143 (16.7%) are EL 4 (lowest).

CONCLUSIONS

Bariatric procedures remain a safe and effective intervention for higher-risk patients with obesity. Clinical decision-making should be evidence-based within the context of a chronic disease. A team approach to perioperative care is mandatory with special attention to nutritional and metabolic issues.