Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Failed Vertical Banded Gastroplasty

Rates and Risk Factors for 30-Day Morbidity After One-Stage Vertical Banded Gastroplasty Conversions: A Retrospective Analysis

Background: The vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) is a historic restrictive bariatric operation often requiring further surgery. In this investigation utilizing the 2021 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) national dataset, we aim to better define the outcomes of VBG conversions.Methods: We queried the 2021 MBSAQIP dataset for patients who underwent a conversion from a VBG to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG). Demographics, comorbidities, laboratory values, and additional patient factors were examined. Rates of key consequential outcome measures 30-day readmission, reoperation, reintervention, mortality, and a composite endpoint (at least 1 of the 4) were further calculated.Results: We identified 231 patients who underwent conversion from VBG to SG (n = 23), RYGB (n = 208), or other anatomy (n = 6), of which 93% of patients were female, and 22% of non-white race. The median age was 56 years and body-mass index (BMI) was 43 kg/m2. The most common surgical indications included weight considerations (48%), reflux (25%), anatomic causes (eg, stricture, fistula, and ulcer; 10%), and dysphagia (6.5%). Thirty-day morbidity rates included reoperation (7.8%), readmission (9.1%), reintervention (4.3%), mortality (.4%), and the composite endpoint (15%). Upon bivariate analysis, we did not identify any specific risk factor for the 30-day composite endpoint.Discussion: One-stage VBG conversions to traditional bariatric anatomy are beset with higher 30-day morbidity relative to primary procedures. Additional MBSAQIP data will be required for aggregation, to better characterize the risk factors inherent in these operations.

Gastric mucocele after conversion of open butterfly gastroplasty to Roux-En-Y gastric bypass - A case report with a review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

There has been a significant increase in the prevalence of morbid obesity across the globe. Various non-surgical weight loss options have shown limited long-term efficacy, leading to the popularity of surgical treatment alternatives with long-term efficacy.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

This case report describes the development of a gastric mucocele in a 51-year-old female patient. The patient initially underwent open butterfly gastroplasty in August 2016. Seven years later, she presented with severe symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). After further diagnostic evaluations, laparoscopic Roux-en-Y bypass surgery was performed. However, the patient experienced complications including fever, abdominal pain, and fluid collection around the stomach. Conservative management initially helped, but persistent symptoms led to laparoscopic exploration, which revealed a distended remnant stomach forming a gastric mucocele. Severe adhesions hindered attempts to remove the remnant stomach, resulting in the need for gastro-gastric anastomosis. Following the surgery, the patient had no symptoms, could eat solid food, and was discharged in good condition.

DISCUSSION

Although various non-surgical weight loss options such as diet modifications, lifestyle changes, and drug therapy have been used for weight loss, they have demonstrated limited long-term efficacy. Surgical treatment has demonstrated long-term efficacy in such patient groups. In recent years, there has been an increased popularity of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) due to long-term weight loss. However, in some cases, complications have also been reported.

CONCLUSION

This case emphasizes the challenges in managing complications from open butterfly gastroplasty and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surgeons should be aware of the possibility of gastric mucocele development and consider appropriate management strategies.

Effect of Primary Versus Revisional One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) on Fatty Acid Profile

INTRODUCTION

One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is one option of a revisional procedure for failed sleeve gastrectomy. Moreover, it can be used as a primary bariatric procedure, and is an effective surgery resulting in significant weight loss and the resolution or improvement of obesity-associated medical problems, accompanied by low perioperative complications. However, as with any therapy, OAGB has its limitations, including micronutrient deficiency or malnutrition. In our study, we compared the fatty acid (FA) profile in serum of patients after both primary OAGB (pOAGB) and revisional OAGB (rOAGB) to identify potential postsurgical FA alterations.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study on patients with obesity who underwent OAGB procedures (pOAGB n=68; rOAGB n=17), conducted from 2016 to 2018. In blood, we analyzed a series of biochemical parameters, and in the serum, the FA profile was determined using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

The percentage of excess BMI loss (% EBMIL) after pOAGB was 73.5 ± 2.47% in comparison to 45.9 ± 4.15% in the rOAGB group (p<0.001). In contrast to the lack of effect of rOAGB on most polyunsaturated FAs, in the pOAGB group, there was a decrease in eicosapentaenoic acid, and eicosatetraenoic and docosahexaenoic acid levels (p<0.001). We also found a decrease in very long-chain FAs (VLCFAs) and an increase in branched-chain FAs (BCFAs) after both types of OAGB procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Both OAGB procedures improved the profile of most FAs, leading to a decrease in VLCFAs, which are considered harmful, and an improvement in BCFAs, which are considered to be beneficial. There is a need to further investigate the possibility of n-3 polyunsaturated FA supplementation after pOAGB, due to the large decrease in these FAs after pOAGB.

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass After Failed Vertical Banded Gastroplasty: 2-Year Follow-up of 102 Patients

BACKGROUND

Vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) is now discarded from being a restrictive procedure for morbid obesity due to its many drawbacks, doubtful efficacy, and lots of post-operative complications. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is the most commonly performed procedure for VBG revision. So we aimed at reporting our experience in conversional RYGB for a failed VBG.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Analyzing follow-up records of 102 patients who underwent revisional RYGB after failed VBG in the period from April 2014 to January 2018.

RESULTS

A total of 102 laparoscopic revisions of failed VBGs to RYGB were performed. The mean operating time was 161.9 min ±29.2 and the mean length of the hospital stay was 1.5 days ±1.2. Fourteen patients (13%) developed early post-operative complications (gastrojejunostomy leak 5; bleeding 9). Four patients (4.7%) developed late complications (Port site hernia 2; internal hernia 1; Stomal ulcer 1). The mean BMI pre-RYGB was 46.6 ± 5.9 kg/m², and the mean %EBWL (percent excess body weight lost) of the patients at 12 and 24 months post-revision were 56.2% and 64.3%, respectively. Our patients had immediate post-revision resolution of VBG-related complications like dysphagia and vomiting. We also report improvement in all obesity-related health problems with (75.7%) complete remission rate and (24.3%) partial remission or improvement rate of diabetes mellitus.

CONCLUSION

Conversion of VBG to RYGB is a feasible procedure and is associated with acceptable early morbidity rates and reduced lengths of hospitalization also it provides acceptable weight loss and improvement in obesity-related health problems. Graphical Abstract.

Bariatric revisional surgery: What are the challenges for the patient and the practitioner?

Bariatric revisional surgery represents an important new issue for obese patients because of the considerable rate of failure and complications following bariatric surgery. As the frequency of bariatric procedures increases, so too does the incidence of revisional surgery, which has become becoming increasingly important. The surgeon must know the indications and the results of the various revisional procedures in order to best guide the therapeutic decision. The current challenge is to correctly select the patients for revisional surgery and to choose the appropriate procedure in each case. Multidisciplinary management is essential to patient re-assessment and to prepare the patient for a re- intervention. The objective of this update, based on data from all the most recent studies concerning revisional surgery, is to guide the surgeon in the choice of the revisional procedure, depending on patient characteristics, co-morbidities, the previously performed procedure, the type of failure or complication observed, but also on the surgeon's own habits and the center's expertise. The collected results show that revisional surgery is difficult, with higher complication rates and weight-loss results that are often lower than those of first-intent surgery. For these reasons, patient selection must be rigorous and multidisciplinary and the management in expert centers of these difficult situations must be encouraged.