1
|
Łabul M, Wysocki M, Małczak P, Matyja M, Dowgiałło-Gornowicz N, Lech P, Szymański M, Major P. The outcomes of Re-Redo bariatric surgery-results from multicenter Polish Revision Obesity Surgery Study (PROSS). Sci Rep 2024; 14:2699. [PMID: 38302523 PMCID: PMC10834407 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-52817-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 02/03/2024] Open
Abstract
The increasing prevalence of bariatric surgery has resulted in a rise in the number of redo procedures as well. While redo bariatric surgery has demonstrated its effectiveness, there is still a subset of patients who may not derive any benefits from it. This poses a significant challenge for bariatric surgeons, especially when there is a lack of clear guidelines. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of patients who underwent Re-Redo bariatric surgery. We conducted a retrospective cohort study on a group of 799 patients who underwent redo bariatric surgery between 2010 and 2020. Among these patients, 20 individuals underwent a second elective redo bariatric surgery (Re-Redo) because of weight regain (15 patients) or insufficient weight loss, i.e. < 50% EWL (5 patients). Mean BMI before Re-Redo surgery was 38.8 ± 4.9 kg/m2. Mean age was 44.4 ± 11.5 years old. The mean %TWL before and after Re-Redo was 17.4 ± 12.4% and %EBMIL was 51.6 ± 35.9%. 13/20 patients (65%) achieved > 50% EWL. The mean final %TWL was 34.2 ± 11.1% and final %EBMIL was 72.1 ± 20.8%. The mean BMI after treatment was 31.9 ± 5.3 kg/m2. Complications occurred in 3 of 20 patients (15%), with no reported mortality or need for another surgical intervention. The mean follow-up after Re-Redo was 35.3 months. Although Re-Redo bariatric surgery is an effective treatment for obesity, it carries a significant risk of complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michał Łabul
- Department of General Surgery, Specialist Hospital in Legnica, Legnica, Poland
| | - Michał Wysocki
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Ludwik Rydygier Memorial Hospital, Os. Złotej Jesieni 1, Cracow, Poland.
| | - Piotr Małczak
- 2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland
| | - Maciej Matyja
- 2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland
| | - Natalia Dowgiałło-Gornowicz
- Department of General, Minimally Invasive and Elderly Surgery, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Olsztyn, Poland
| | - Paweł Lech
- Department of General, Minimally Invasive and Elderly Surgery, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Olsztyn, Poland
| | - Michał Szymański
- Department of General, Endocrine and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Piotr Major
- 2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
El Masry MAMA, Rahman IA. Perioperative Morbidity and Mortality of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) in a Single-Surgeon Experience on 892 Patients Over 11 Years. World J Surg 2023; 47:2809-2815. [PMID: 37548678 PMCID: PMC10545609 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-023-07123-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has been the most frequently performed bariatric procedure since 2014, with continually growing popularity. This study aimed to present our 30-day morbidity and mortality following LSG over a period of 11 years. PATIENTS AND METHODS This is a retrospective study that was based on prospectively collected data from patients undergoing LSG by the same surgeon from July 2011 to the end of August 2022. The LSG-associated 30-day morbidity and mortality and the risk factors for 30-day morbidity were assessed. RESULTS This study included 892 patients who underwent LSG over the course of 11 years. Early postoperative adverse events were encountered in 16 patients (1.79%). Overall, twelve patients (1.35%) required blood transfusions, and two patients (0.22%) required ICU admission. The re-operation rate was 0.9% (n = 8) and the mortality rate was 0.22% (n = 2). The patient's BMI, hypertension, and revisional surgery were marginally significant/significant predictors of early postoperative morbidity. The mean EBWL% was 63.8 ± 15.55 at the 6-month follow-up. CONCLUSION This study confirms the previously reported LSG's short-term safety in terms of a low rate of 30-day postoperative morbidity and mortality. Preoperative BMI, hypertension, and revisional surgery are risk factors for 30-day morbidity and mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Islam Abdul Rahman
- General Surgery, Military Production Specialized Medical Centre, Cairo, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fehervari M, Banh S, Varma P, Das B, Al-Yaqout K, Al-Sabah S, Khwaja H, Efthimiou E, Ashrafian H. Weight loss specific to indication, remission of diabetes, and short-term complications after sleeve gastrectomy conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2023; 19:384-395. [PMID: 36581551 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2022.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2022] [Revised: 10/03/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is the most frequently performed bariatric procedure worldwide. Long-term complications such as insufficient weight loss (IWL) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) may necessitate SG conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). The aim of this review was to determine the indication-specific weight loss and diabetes remission after SG conversion to RYGB (STOBY). Our objective was to extract all available published data on indication for conversion, weight loss, remission of diabetes, and short-term complications after STOBY. A systematic literature search was conducted to identify studies reporting outcomes following STOBY. A random effects model was used for meta-analysis. The search identified 44 relevant studies. Overall short-term (12-mo) excess weight loss (EWL) was 54.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 46%-63%) in 23 studies (n = 712) and total weight loss (TWL) was 19.9% (95% CI, 14%-25%) in 21 studies (n = 740). For IWL, short-term (12-mo) pooled weight loss outcomes were 53.9% EWL (95% CI, 48%-59%) in 14 studies (n = 295) and 22.7% TWL (95% CI, 17%-28%) in 12 studies (n = 219), and medium-term (2-5 yr) outcomes were 45.8% EWL (95% CI, 38%-53%) in 7 studies (n = 154) and 20.6% TWL (95% CI, 15%-26%) in 9 studies (n = 206). Overall diabetes remission was 53% (95% CI, 33%-72%), and the perioperative complication rate was 8.2% (95% CI, 7.6%-8.7%). Revisional SG conversion to RYGB for IWL can achieve good weight loss outcomes and diabetes remission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matyas Fehervari
- Department of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Serena Banh
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Piyush Varma
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Bibek Das
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Haris Khwaja
- Department of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Hutan Ashrafian
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Drakos P, Volteas P, Khomutova A, Yang J, Nie L, Pryor AD, Docimo S, Powers KA, Spaniolas K. The durability of revisional sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass after previous adjustable gastric band. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:2326-2334. [PMID: 36220986 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09645-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with adjustable gastric banding (AGB) often require revision to one-stage or two-stage sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). OBJECTIVE To compare the long-term durability of revisional SG and RYGB, in terms of subsequent revision or conversion (RC). METHODS The New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative Systems dataset was queried from 2006 to 2013 for patients who underwent primary SG and RYGB, one-stage, and two-stage conversion from AGB to SG and RYGB. Patients who required RC were identified. A multivariable Cox proportional hazard model was used to compare the RC risk among these groups. RESULTS 13,749 had primary SG, 621 one-stage, and 321 two-stage AGB to SG. 31,814 had primary RYGB, 555 one-stage, and 248 two-stage AGB to RYGB. The estimated 5-year cumulative RC incidence rate was significantly lower after primary surgery than after prior AGB (one-stage AGB to SG 14.4%, two-stage AGB to SG 11.6%, primary SG 5.2%, one-stage AGB to RYBG 3.4%, two-stage AGB to RYGB 2.9%, and primary RYGB 1.1%, p-value < 0.0001). RYGB and SG did not differ significantly in terms of the elevation effect of one- and two-stage AGB conversion over primary surgeries (RYGB vs SG: one stage vs primary ratio of HR = 0.97, 95% CI = [0.58, 1.63], p-value = 0.9153; two stage vs primary ratio of HR = 1. 02, 95% CI = [0.50, 2.07], p-value = 0.9596). CONCLUSION RC after AGB to SG or RYGB is more frequent compared to primary surgeries with procedures following AGB to SG being more common than AGB to RYGB. However, that difference was proportionally similar to the RC rate ratio differences noted for primary SG and RYGB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Panagiotis Drakos
- Department of Surgery, Stony Brook Medicine, Renaissance School of Medicine, Health Sciences Center, T19-053, Stony Brook, NY, 11794-8191, USA
| | - Panagiotis Volteas
- Department of Surgery, Stony Brook Medicine, Renaissance School of Medicine, Health Sciences Center, T19-053, Stony Brook, NY, 11794-8191, USA
| | - Alisa Khomutova
- Department of Surgery, Stony Brook Medicine, Renaissance School of Medicine, Health Sciences Center, T19-053, Stony Brook, NY, 11794-8191, USA.
| | - Jie Yang
- Division of Preventive Medicine, Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Lizhou Nie
- Department of Biostatistics, Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Aurora D Pryor
- Division of Bariatric, Foregut, and Advanced Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Salvatore Docimo
- Division of Bariatric, Foregut, and Advanced Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Kinga A Powers
- Division of Bariatric, Foregut, and Advanced Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Konstantinos Spaniolas
- Division of Bariatric, Foregut, and Advanced Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Association Between Energy and Macronutrient Intakes and Weight Change After Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obes Surg 2023; 33:938-949. [PMID: 36604381 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-022-06443-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2022] [Revised: 12/25/2022] [Accepted: 12/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize the evidence on the associations of energy and macronutrient intakes (carbohydrates, fats, and proteins) with weight loss in adults after sleeve gastrectomy or gastric bypass and to determine whether these dietary characteristics of patients with suboptimal weight loss (SWL) or weight regain differ from those without these experiences. METHODS PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched until December 2021. Twenty-three observational studies were included. RESULTS Studies on the association of postoperative energy and macronutrients and weight loss used diverse approaches. Pooled results showed that patients with SWL consumed more energy than those with acceptable weight loss. Weight regainers consumed more energy and carbohydrates and less protein than non-regainers. CONCLUSIONS Higher energy consumption is related to SWL and weight regain after surgery. Associations between macronutrients and weight outcome following bariatric surgery warrant further investigation.
Collapse
|
6
|
Bennett WC, Garbarine IC, Mostellar M, Lipman J, Sanchez-Casalongue M, Farrell T, Zhou R. Comparison of early post-operative complications in primary and revisional laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, gastric bypass, and duodenal switch MBSAQIP-reported cases from 2015 to 2019. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:3728-3738. [PMID: 36653536 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09796-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 11/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is now the most performed bariatric surgery, though gastric bypass (GB) and duodenal switch (DS) remain common, especially as conversion/revision (C/R) procedures. This analysis compared early postoperative outcomes of primary and C/R laparoscopic SG to DS and GB; and primary procedures of each vs C/R counterparts. METHODS The Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) dataset was queried for SG, GB, and DS cases from 2015 to 2019. Multivariable logistic regression calculated crude and adjusted odds ratios for surgical site infection (SSI), reoperation, and readmission at 30 days in two initial comparisons: (1) primary SG vs DS or GB and (2) C/R SG vs DS or GB. A secondary analysis compared primary GS, GB, or DS with C/R counterparts. Models were adjusted for confounding demographics and comorbidities. RESULTS Of 755,968 primary cases, most were SG (72.8%), followed by GB (26.3%), then DS (0.9%). Compared to SG, GB and DS demonstrated higher odds of SSI (aOR 3.02 [2.84, 3.2]), readmission (aOR 1.97 [1.92, 2.03]), and reoperation (aOR 2.74 [2.62, 2.86]), respectively. Of 68,716 C/R cases, SG was most common (43.2%), followed by GB (37.5%), then DS (19.2%). C/R GB and DS demonstrated greater risk of SSI (aOR 2.28 [1.98, 2.62]), readmission (aOR 2.10 [1.94, 2.27]), and reoperation (aOR 2.3 [2.04, 2.59]) vs SG, respectively. C/R SG and DS demonstrated greater risk of SSI (OR 2.09 [1.66, 2.63]; 1.63 [1.24, 2.14), readmission (OR 1.13 [1.02, 1.26]), and reoperation (OR 1.27 [1.06, 1.52]; 1.58 [1.24, 2.0]), vs primary procedures. C/R DS demonstrated greater risk of SSI (OR 1.23 [1.66, 2.63]). CONCLUSIONS Early complications are comparable between GB and DS, and greater than SG. In C/R procedures, GB and DS demonstrate greater risk than SG. Overall, C/R procedures demonstrate greater risk of most, but not all, early postoperative complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William C Bennett
- Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, 4001 Burnett-Womack Building, CB #7050, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. .,Digestive Disease & Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| | - Ian C Garbarine
- Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, 4001 Burnett-Womack Building, CB #7050, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Murphy Mostellar
- Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, 4001 Burnett-Womack Building, CB #7050, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Jeffrey Lipman
- Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, 4001 Burnett-Womack Building, CB #7050, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.,Hernia Center, NYC Health + Hospitals / Bellevue, New York, NY, USA
| | - Manuel Sanchez-Casalongue
- Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, 4001 Burnett-Womack Building, CB #7050, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,Rush Copley Medical Center, Rush University, Aurora, IL, USA
| | - Timothy Farrell
- Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, 4001 Burnett-Womack Building, CB #7050, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Randal Zhou
- Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, 4001 Burnett-Womack Building, CB #7050, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,Division of Bariatric and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wysocki M, Łabul M, Małczak P, Proczko-Stepaniak M, Szymański M, Hady HR, Głuszyńska P, Myśliwiec P, Walędziak M, Zarzycki P, Rymarowicz J, Pędziwiatr M, Pisarska-Adamczyk M, Major P, Pędziwiatr M, Rymarowicz J, Zarzycki P, Stefura T, Ciszek K, Myśliwiec P, Hady HR, Głuszyńska P, Proczko-Stepaniak M, Szymański M, Walędziak M, Janik M, Kwiatkowski A, Materlak M, Bartosiak K, Czyżykowski Ł, Mawlichanów M, Kowalewski P, Szeliga J, Kupczyk W, Dowgiałło-Gornowicz N, Lech P, Harań A, Kowalski G, Łabul M, Mulek R, Kreft M, Wysocki M, Orłowski M, Franczak P, Binda A, Tarnowski W, Jaworski P, Bartosiak K, Kamiński M, Pastuszka M, Lisik W, Szymański P, Katkowski B, Leśniak M. Analysis of the risk factors for perioperative morbidity after laparoscopic revisional bariatric procedures: results from the multicenter Polish Revision Obesity Surgery Study. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2023; 19:68-75. [PMID: 36182567 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2022.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2022] [Revised: 04/12/2022] [Accepted: 08/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The growing number of primary bariatric operations has led to an increase in demand for revision surgeries. Higher numbers of revisional operations are also observed in Poland, yet their safety and efficacy remain controversial because of a lack of current recommendations and guidelines. OBJECTIVE To review risk factors influencing perioperative morbidity. METHODS A retrospective study was conducted to analyze the results of surgical treatment among 12 Polish bariatric centers. Inclusion criteria were laparoscopic revisional bariatric surgeries and patients ≥18 years of age. The study included 795 patients, of whom 621 were female; the mean age was 47 years (range: 40-55 years). RESULTS Perioperative morbidity occurred in 92 patients (11.6%) enrolled in the study, including 76 women (82.6%). The median age was 45 years (range: 39-54 years). Statistically significant risk factors in univariate logistic regression models for perioperative complications were the duration of obesity, revisional surgery after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or adjustable gastric band (AGB), difference in body mass index before revisional surgery and the lowest achieved after primary surgery, and postoperative morbidity of the primary surgery as the cause for revisional bariatric surgery. These factors were included in the multivariate regression model. Revisional surgery after AGB (odds ratio [OR] = 2.18; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.28-3.69; P = .004), revisional surgery performed after RYGB (OR = 6.52; 95% CI: 1.98-21.49; P = .002), and revisions due to complication of the primary surgery (OR = 1.89; 95% CI: 1.06-3.34; P = .030) remained independent risk factors for perioperative morbidity. CONCLUSION Revisional operations after RYGB or AGB and those performed because of postoperative morbidity after primary surgery as the main cause for revisional surgery were associated with a significantly increased risk of postoperative morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michał Wysocki
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Ludwik Rydygier Memorial Hospital, Cracow, Poland
| | - Michał Łabul
- Department of General Surgery, Specialist Hospital, Legnica, Poland
| | - Piotr Małczak
- Second Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland.
| | - Monika Proczko-Stepaniak
- Department of General, Endocrine and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
| | - Michał Szymański
- Department of General, Endocrine and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
| | - Hady Razak Hady
- First Department of General and Endocrinological Surgery, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland
| | - Paulina Głuszyńska
- First Department of General and Endocrinological Surgery, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland
| | - Piotr Myśliwiec
- First Department of General and Endocrinological Surgery, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland
| | - Maciej Walędziak
- Department of General, Oncological, Metabolic and Thoracic Surgery, Military Institute of Medicine, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Piotr Zarzycki
- Second Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland
| | - Justyna Rymarowicz
- Second Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland
| | - Michał Pędziwiatr
- Second Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland
| | | | - Piotr Major
- Second Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Super J, Charalampakis V, Tahrani AA, Kumar S, Bankenahally R, Raghuraman G, Jambulingam PS, Kelly J, Ammori BJ, Singhal R. Safety and feasibility of revisional bariatric surgery following Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Band - Outcomes from a large UK private practice. Obes Res Clin Pract 2021; 15:381-386. [PMID: 34147378 DOI: 10.1016/j.orcp.2021.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2020] [Revised: 05/25/2021] [Accepted: 06/04/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Revisional bariatric surgery is unavoidable in a proportion of patients. Despite its need, the development of this speciality has been hampered by its complexity and preferred delivery in institutional set ups. Although primary bariatric surgery can be delivered in the private sector; safety and feasibility of revisional bariatric surgery remains unexplored in this setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients undergoing revisional bariatric surgery following previous Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Band (LAGB) between 2008 and 2019 at a single private bariatric unit with a minimum follow up of at least 6 months were included. The primary aim was safety outcomes and 30-day morbidity. RESULTS 178 patients with BMI of 45.6 ± 8.2 kg/m2 underwent revisional bariatric surgery. One stage conversion was performed for 86.5% of the cases. At 9.5 ± 5.3 months follow up, BMI and percentage excess BMI loss were 31.8 ± 6.2 kg/m2 and 62.6 ± 40% respectively. There was no mortality, and the major complication rate was 2.8%. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of complications based on one-stage vs. two-stage conversion (p = 0.52). There were no differences in weight loss outcomes post-revisional surgery according to the indication for revision (p = 0.446) or weight loss following primary surgery (p = 0.12). CONCLUSION Revisional bariatric surgery can be delivered safely in the private sector with good outcomes. One-stage conversions are feasible and do not detrimentally affect the morbidity of the procedure or the weight loss outcomes. More importantly, success following revisional surgery is independent of the indication for revision and weight loss outcomes following primary surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Super
- Department of Surgery, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, UK
| | - Vasileios Charalampakis
- Department of General and GI Surgery, Warwick Hospital, South Warwickshire NHS Foundation Trust, UK; Healthier Weight, UK
| | - Abd A Tahrani
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Diabetes and Weight Management, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK; Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, UK; Healthier Weight, UK
| | - Sajith Kumar
- Department of Anaesthesia, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK; Healthier Weight, UK
| | - Rajneesh Bankenahally
- Department of Anaesthesia, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK; Healthier Weight, UK
| | - Govindan Raghuraman
- Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Queen Elizabeth Hospital King's Lynn, UK; Healthier Weight, UK
| | - P S Jambulingam
- Department of Upper GI & Bariatric Surgery, Bedfordshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Luton and Dunstable University Hospital, UK; Healthier Weight, UK
| | - Jamie Kelly
- Dept. of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton, UK; Healthier Weight, UK
| | - Basil J Ammori
- Department of Surgery, Salford Royal Hospital, Manchester, UK; Burjeel Hospital, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates; Healthier Weight, UK
| | - Rishi Singhal
- Department of Bariatric Surgery, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK; Healthier Weight, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gao X, Zhu L, Li W, Zhu S, Li P. Revisional large gastric pouch with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for patients with type 2 diabetes and a body mass index less than 35 kg/m 2: a cause and effect analysis. Surg Today 2021; 52:287-293. [PMID: 34109448 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-021-02317-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the long-term efficacy of large gastric pouch surgery and revisional surgery in patients with a body mass index (BMI) < 35 kg/m2 and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy with a large gastric pouch in our hospital. The clinical pre- and post-surgery data, including BMI, waist circumference, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), lipid metabolism-related indicators, homoeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), and major complications, were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS Twenty-four patients were included in the analysis, 12 of whom underwent revisional surgery. At their 5-year-follow-up after the primary surgery, the BMI and waist circumference of the patients with T2DM were lower than their baseline values. The BMI, HbA1c, HOMA-IR, FPG and waist circumference also decreased after the revisional surgery. The rates of remission of diabetes after the primary vs. after the revisional surgery were 4.17% vs. 41.70%, respectively (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy with a large gastric pouch is not effective in the long term and, therefore, is unsuitable for Chinese patients with T2DM and a BMI < 35 kg/m2. Conversely, revisional surgery has a definite effect on these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiang Gao
- Department of General Surgery, Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410013, China
| | - Liyong Zhu
- Department of General Surgery, Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410013, China
| | - Weizheng Li
- Department of General Surgery, Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410013, China
| | - Shaihong Zhu
- Department of General Surgery, Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410013, China
| | - Pengzhou Li
- Department of General Surgery, Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410013, China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Corcelles R, Del Gobbo GD. Comment on: Outcomes in racial and ethnic minorities following revisional robotic-assisted metabolic and bariatric surgery: a matched analysis of the MBSAQIP database. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2020; 16:1937-1938. [PMID: 33092956 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2020.09.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2020] [Revised: 09/11/2020] [Accepted: 09/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ricard Corcelles
- Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates; Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Vallois A, Rebibo L, Le Roux Y, Dhahri A, Alves A, Regimbeau JM. Comparison of sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass after failure of gastric banding: a two-center study with a propensity score-matched analysis. Surg Endosc 2020; 35:3513-3522. [PMID: 32851467 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07809-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2020] [Accepted: 07/10/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few studies on series comparing sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) after failure of gastric banding (GB) are available. The objective of this study was to compare the short- and medium-term outcomes of SG and RYGB after GB. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between January 2006 and December 2017, patients undergoing SG (n = 186) or RYGB (n = 107) for failure of primary GB were included in this two-center study. Propensity-score matching was performed based on preoperative factors with a 2:1 ratio. Primary endpoint was the weight loss at 2 years between the SG and RYGB groups. Secondary endpoints were overall mortality and morbidity, reoperation, correction of comorbidities and the rate of adverse events at 2 years follow-up. RESULTS In our propensity score matching analysis, operative time was significantly less in the SG group (95 min vs. 179 min; p < 0.001). Post-operative complications were lower in the SG group (9.5% vs. 35.4%; p = 0.003). At 2 years follow-up, the mean EWL was similar as same as comorbidities. There was a significant difference in favor of SG concerning the rate of adverse events at 2 years follow-up (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Revision of GB by SG or RYGB is feasible, with a higher rate of early post-operative complications for RYGB. Weight loss at 2 years follow-up is similar; however, RYGB appears to result in a higher rate of adverse events than SG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoine Vallois
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Caen University Hospital, Avenue de la Côte de Nacre, 14033, Caen, France
| | - Lionel Rebibo
- Department of Digestive, Esogastric and Bariatric Surgery, Bichat Claude Bernard University Hospital, 46 rue Henri Huchard, 75018, Paris, France.,Université de Paris, Inserm UMR 1149, 75018, Paris, France.,SSPC (Simplification of Surgical Patients Care) - Clinical Research Unit, University of Picardie Jules Verne, 80054, Amiens, France
| | - Yannick Le Roux
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Caen University Hospital, Avenue de la Côte de Nacre, 14033, Caen, France
| | - Abdennaceur Dhahri
- SSPC (Simplification of Surgical Patients Care) - Clinical Research Unit, University of Picardie Jules Verne, 80054, Amiens, France.,Department of Digestive Surgery, Amiens University Medical Center, 1 Rond-Point du Professeur Christian Cabrol, 80054, Amiens, France
| | - Arnaud Alves
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Caen University Hospital, Avenue de la Côte de Nacre, 14033, Caen, France.,Anticipe, INSERM U1086, Pôle de recherche du CHU de Caen, Centre François Baclesse, Avenue du Général Harris, 14076, Caen Cedex 5, France
| | - Jean-Marc Regimbeau
- SSPC (Simplification of Surgical Patients Care) - Clinical Research Unit, University of Picardie Jules Verne, 80054, Amiens, France. .,Department of Digestive Surgery, Amiens University Medical Center, 1 Rond-Point du Professeur Christian Cabrol, 80054, Amiens, France. .,Service de Chirurgie Digestive, CHU Amiens-Picardie, Site Sud, 1 Rond-Point du Professeur Christian Cabrol, 80054, Amiens Cedex 1, France.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Cheema F, Choi M, Moran-Atkin E, Camacho D, Choi J. Outcomes in revisional bariatric surgery: a high-volume single institution experience. Surg Endosc 2020; 35:3932-3939. [PMID: 32754827 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07855-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2020] [Accepted: 07/28/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aims to evaluate outcomes of adjustable gastric band (AGB) conversion to sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), SG conversion to RYGB and RYGB revision procedures. METHODS Patients undergoing secondary bariatric surgery between 2009 and 2017 were retrospectively identified from a prospective database. Primary outcomes were weight loss and improvement in comorbidities. For weight loss, percent of total body weight loss (%TWL) and percentage of excess BMI loss (%EBMIL) were included. Comorbidities included were hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C), cardiovascular risk (CV) and hypertension. RESULTS 266 Secondary bariatric procedures were analyzed. There were four Grade IIIb complications within 30 days. There was greater %EBMIL at 12 and 24 months in the AGB to RYGB group, and in %TWL at 24 months compared to AGB to SG group (p < 0.05). Only AGB to RYGB had significantly continued improvement in these two parameters at 24 months compared to at 6 months post-operatively-%EBMIL and %TWL tapered off in the other procedures. There was significantly lower CV risk in dyslipidemic patients at 24 months in the AGB to RYGB compared to the AGB to SG group. In the SG to RYGB patients, there was significant improvement in CV risk in dyslipidemic patients at 24 months compared to baseline. There was significant improvement in HbA1C in diabetics in AGB to RYGB patients at 6 and 12 months, in AGB to SG patients at 12 months, and in SG to RYGB patients at 12 and 24 months compared to baseline. In RYGB revision and SG to RYGB patients, there was a relative increase in the number of patients being normotensive at 24 months compared to baseline. CONCLUSION Secondary bariatric surgery is a complex and challenging procedure that may improve weight loss and cardiovascular risk for certain procedures but further studies will be necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fareed Cheema
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, USA.
| | - Michael Choi
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, USA
| | - Erin Moran-Atkin
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, USA
| | - Diego Camacho
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, USA
| | - Jenny Choi
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sleeve gastrectomy as a rescue of failed gastric banding: comparison of 1- and 2-step approaches. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2020; 16:1045-1051. [PMID: 32402733 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2020.03.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2019] [Revised: 03/10/2020] [Accepted: 03/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Series comparing gastric banding (GB) removal and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) when procedures are performed as a 1- or a 2-step approach are contradictory in their outcomes. No series comparing these approaches with midterm weight loss is available. OBJECTIVES Compare the outcomes and weight loss of SG performed as 1- and 2-step approaches as a revisional procedure for GB failure. SETTING University Hospital, France, public practice. METHODS Between February 2006 and January 2017, all patients undergoing SG with a previous history of implementation of GB (n = 358) were included in this 2-center, retrospective, observational study. Revisional surgery was proposed in patients with insufficient excess weight loss (excess weight loss ≤50%) or weight regain after GB. A 1-step (1-step group, n = 270) or 2-step (2-step group, n = 88) approach was decided depending on patient's choice and/or surgeon's preference. The primary efficacy endpoint was the comparison of weight loss in the 1- and 2-step groups at the 2-year follow-up. The secondary efficacy endpoints were short-term outcomes (overall mortality and morbidity at postoperative day 30, specific morbidity, reoperation, length of hospital stay, and readmission). RESULTS In the 1-step group, the mean preoperative body mass index before SG was 40.5 kg/m2 (27.0-69.0), while in the 2-step group, the mean preoperative body mass index was 43.5 kg/m2 (31.5-61.7). Mean operating time was 109 minutes (50-240) in the 1-step group and 78.7 minutes (40-175) in the 2-step group (P = .22). In the 1-step group, 6 conversions to laparotomy occurred, while in the 2-step group, 2 conversions to laparotomy occurred (P = .75). One death (.2%, in the 2-step group) and 39 complications (30 in the 1-step group [11.1%] and 9 in the 2-step group [10.2%]) also occurred. The mean length of hospital stay was 6.2 days in the 1-step group and 4.1 days in the 2-step group. At 2-year follow-up, mean body mass index was 32.4 kg/m2 in the 1-step group and 33.2 kg/m2 in the 2-step group (P = .15), representing excess weight losses of 61.9 and 50.1 (P = .05), respectively. The rates of revisional surgery were .7% and 2.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS SG after previous GB is efficient with similar outcomes depending on the 1- or 2-step approach. The 1-step approach seems to have increased weight loss compared with the 2-step approach.
Collapse
|
14
|
Salvator M, Veyrie N, Rozenberg P, Berveiller P. [Which management of pregnancy after bariatric surgery?]. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 48:746-753. [PMID: 32387764 DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2020.04.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Obesity represents a major public health issue and a potential threat for people health. Moreover, the incidence of obesity has been increasing and therefore, the incidence of women with an history of bariatric surgery with a pregnancy desire has been also increased. Although the weight loss after bariatric surgery has positive effects on pregnancy outcomes, these surgical procedures may be associated with adverse outcomes as well, for example micronutrient deficiencies, dumping syndrome, surgical complications such as internal hernias, and obstetrical complications such as small for gestational age as instance. Nevertheless, physician knowledge about pregnancy management after bariatric surgery is currently insufficient and a multidisciplinary approach is therefore mandatory. The aim of this article is to provide to readers general and recent data regarding the management of pregnancy after bariatric surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Salvator
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, centre hospitalier intercommunal de Poissy Saint-Germain, Poissy, France
| | - N Veyrie
- International Obesity Center of Paris - IOCP, Paris, France
| | - P Rozenberg
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, centre hospitalier intercommunal de Poissy Saint-Germain, Poissy, France
| | - P Berveiller
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, centre hospitalier intercommunal de Poissy Saint-Germain, Poissy, France; UVSQ, INRAE, BREED, université Paris-Saclay, 78350 Jouy-en-Josas, France; BREED, école nationale vétérinaire d'Alfort, 94700 Maisons-Alfort, France.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Axer S, Szabo E, Agerskov S, Näslund I. Predictive factors of complications in revisional gastric bypass surgery: results from the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2019; 15:2094-2100. [DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.09.071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2019] [Revised: 09/02/2019] [Accepted: 09/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
16
|
Zenilman A, Pechman D, Moran-Atkin E, Choi J, Camacho D. Bariatric surgery in patients with left ventricular assist devices: a safe and effective method of weight loss as a gateway to heart transplantation. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2019; 15:1780-1784. [DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2019] [Revised: 07/09/2019] [Accepted: 08/03/2019] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
|