Bariatric Surgery in Patients with Cirrhosis: Careful Patient and Surgery-Type Selection Is Key to Improving Outcomes

Scientific evidence for the updated guidelines on indications for metabolic and bariatric surgery (IFSO/ASMBS)

The 2022 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) and International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO) updated the indications for metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS), replacing the previous guidelines established by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) over 30 years ago. The evidence supporting these updated guidelines has been strengthened to assist metabolic and bariatric surgeons, nutritionists, and other members of multidisciplinary teams (MDTs), as well as patients. This study aims to assess the level of evidence and the strength of recommendations compared to the previously published criteria.

Scientific Evidence for the Updated Guidelines on Indications for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (IFSO/ASMBS)

The 2022 American Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) and International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO) updated the indications for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (MBS), replacing the previous guidelines established by the NIH over 30 years ago. The evidence supporting these updated guidelines has been strengthened to assist metabolic and bariatric surgeons, nutritionists, and other members of multidisciplinary teams, as well as patients. This study aims to assess the level of evidence and the strength of recommendations compared to the previously published criteria.

Outcomes of bariatric surgery in the setting of compensated advanced chronic liver disease associated with clinically significant portal hypertension: a multicenter, retrospective, cohort study on feasibility and safety

BACKGROUND

The obesity epidemic has led to an increase in the proportion of patients with chronic liver disease due to metabolic associated steatosic liver disease and in the prevalence of obesity in patients with cirrhosis. Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) has been proven to determine weight loss, obesity-related medical problems remission, and liver steatosis, inflammation, and fibrosis improvement. However, cirrhosis and portal hypertension are well-known risk factors for increased morbidity and mortality after surgery. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety of MBS in patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cALCD) and clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This is an international, multicentric, retrospective study on 63 individuals affected by obesity with cALCD and CSPH who underwent MBS in tertiary referral centers with experts hepatobiliary surgeons between January 2010 and October 2022. The primary endpoint was postoperative mortality at 90 days. The secondary endpoints included postoperative weight loss at last follow-up and postoperative complication rate. In addition, the authors performed subgroup analyses of Child-Pugh (A vs. B) score, MELD (≤9 vs. >9) score, and type of surgery.

RESULTS

One patient (1.6%) experienced gastric leakage and mortality. There were three (5%) reported cases of portal vein thrombosis, two (3%) postoperative acute renal failure, and one (1.6%) postoperative encephalopathy. Child-Pugh score A resulted to be a protective factor for intraoperative bleeding requiring transfusion at univariate analysis (OR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.55-0.97, P =0.046) but not at multivariate analysis. MELD>9 score and the type of surgery did not result to be a risk factor for any postoperative complication.

CONCLUSION

MBS is safe in patients with cALCD and CSPH performed in tertiary bariatric referral centers with hepatobiliary expert surgeons. Larger, prospective studies with longer follow-up periods are needed to confirm these results.

Cirrhosis and non-hepatic surgery in 2023 - a precision medicine approach

INTRODUCTION

Patients with liver disease and portal hypertension frequently require surgery carrying high morbidity and mortality. Accurately estimating surgical risk remains challenging despite improved medical and surgical management.

AREAS COVERED

This review aims to outline a comprehensive approach to preoperative assessment, appraise methods used to predict surgical risk, and provide an up-to-date overview of outcomes for patients with cirrhosis undergoing non-hepatic surgery.

EXPERT OPINION

Robust preoperative, individually tailored, and precise risk assessment can reduce peri- and postoperative complications in patients with cirrhosis. Established prognostic scores aid stratification, providing an estimation of postoperative mortality, albeit with limitations. VOCAL-Penn Risk Score may provide greater precision than established liver severity scores. Amelioration of portal hypertension in advance of surgery may be considered, with prospective data demonstrating hepatic venous pressure gradient as a promising surrogate marker of postoperative outcomes. Morbidity and mortality vary between types of surgery with further studies required in patients with more advanced liver disease. Patient-specific considerations and practicing precision medicine may allow for improved postoperative outcomes.

Bariatric surgery for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: Indications and post-operative management

The prevalence of obesity and metabolic consequences such as nonalcoholic fatty liver diseases (NAFLD) has become a crucial health problem. Lifestyle modifications, especially weight loss, effectively reduces liver injury in NAFLD patients. However, adherence to lifestyle changes is very low in the clinical setting. Bariatric surgery can improve metabolic components and cause long-term weight loss. Therefore, bariatric surgery could serve as an attractive treatment option for NAFLD patients. This review integrates data about the benefits of bariatric surgery on NAFLD but also describes the potential pitfalls.

Outcomes of Patients with Severe Obesity and Cirrhosis with Portal Hypertension Undergoing Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review

PURPOSE

Thus far, little attention has been paid to bariatric surgery (BS) in patients with severe obesity (SO) and cirrhosis with portal hypertension (PH). To address this knowledge gap, we systematically reviewed the available literature and evidence about BS in patients with SO and cirrhosis with PH. We inform on the perioperative and long-term outcomes of this intervention.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Articles were identified in MEDLINE, SCOPUS, LILACS, and SCIELO, and included if they analyzed SO patients with clinically significant PH and reported the characteristics and outcomes of BS.

RESULTS

Six articles, including 32 patients, were included. The most frequent type of BS was sleeve gastrectomy performed in 27 patients. Perioperative transfusions were often not required, with only one case report describing the use of 1 unit of packed red blood cells post-operatively. Neither intraoperative nor post-op deaths were reported. All patients reported significant weight loss with improvements in comorbidities during the follow-up periods. Overall, 27 out of 29 patients had T2DM resolution, and 13 out of 23 had arterial hypertension resolution. One study reported improvements in the parameters of fibroscan.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review described the outcomes of BS among patients with SO with cirrhosis and PH. Performing this kind of surgery among these patients appears safe and associated with acceptable perioperative and long-term outcomes. However, further studies are required to provide evidence-based, strong recommendations.

2022 American Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) and International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO) Indications for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery

MAJOR UPDATES TO 1991 NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH GUIDELINES FOR BARIATRIC SURGERY: Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is recommended for individuals with a body mass index (BMI) >35 kg/m2, regardless of presence, absence, or severity of co-morbidities.MBS should be considered for individuals with metabolic disease and BMI of 30-34.9 kg/m2.BMI thresholds should be adjusted in the Asian population such that a BMI >25 kg/m2 suggests clinical obesity, and individuals with BMI >27.5 kg/m2 should be offered MBS.Long-term results of MBS consistently demonstrate safety and efficacy.Appropriately selected children and adolescents should be considered for MBS.(Surg Obes Relat Dis 2022; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2022.08.013 ) © 2022 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. All rights reserved.

2022 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) and International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO): Indications for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery

Major updates to 1991 National Institutes of Health guidelines for bariatric surgery.

Bariatric Surgery is Effective and Safe for Obese Patients with Compensated Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

With the global pandemic of obesity and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), the incidence of cirrhosis associated with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) has greatly increased. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bariatric surgery in obese cirrhotic patients.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched for relevant studies. Effectiveness outcomes were weight loss, remission of comorbidities, and improvement in liver function. Safety outcomes were procedural complications and mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 15 studies were included in this meta-analysis. Patients with compensated cirrhosis lost weight significantly after surgery, and the percentage of excess weight loss was 60.44 (95% CI, 44.34 to 76.55). Bariatric surgery resulted in remission of NAFLD in 57.9% (95% CI, 27.5% to 88.3%), T2DM in 58.4% (95% CI, 48.4% to 68.4%), hypertension in 53.1% (95% CI, 43% to 63.3%), dyslipidemia in 59.8% (95% CI, 41.1% to 78.5%) of patients with cirrhosis. Bariatric surgery reduced the levels of alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase. The incidence of surgical complications in patients with cirrhosis was about 19.2% (95% CI, 11.7% to 26.6%), which was higher than that in patients without cirrhosis (OR 2.67 [95% CI, 1.26 to 5.67]). Patients with cirrhosis had an overall mortality rate of 1.3%, and the mortality rates for compensated cirrhosis and decompensated cirrhosis were 0.9% and 18.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Bariatric surgery is effective for weight loss, remission of comorbidities, and reversal of liver damage. Although cirrhotic patients have a higher risk of complications and death, bariatric surgery is relatively safe for well-compensated cirrhosis.

The clinical impact of cirrhosis on the postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing bariatric surgery: propensity score-matched analysis of 2011-2017 US hospitals

Objectives: Since there is increasing number of patients with cirrhosis who require the bariatric procedure due to obesity and obesity-related nonalcoholic steatohepatitis fibrosis, we evaluate the effect of cirrhosis on post-bariatric surgery outcomes.Methods: 2011-2017 National Inpatient Sample was used to isolate bariatric cases, which were stratified by cirrhosis; controls were propensity-score matched to cases and compared to endpoints: mortality, length of stay (LOS), costs, and postoperative complications.Results: From 190,753 patients undergoing bariatric surgery, there were 957 with cirrhosis and 957 matched controls. There was no difference in mortality (0.94 vs 0.52% p = 0.42, OR 1.81 95%CI 0.60-5.41); however, cirrhosis patients had higher LOS (3.36 vs 2.89d p = 0.002), costs ($68,671 vs $61,301 p < 0.001), and bleeding (2.09 vs 0.72% p < 0.001, OR 2.95 95%CI 1.89-4.61). In multivariate, there was no difference in mortality (p = 0.330, aOR 1.73 95%CI 0.58-5.19). In subgroup comparison of cirrhosis patients, those with decompensated cirrhosis had higher mortality (7.69 vs 0.94% p < 0.001, OR 8.78 95%CI 3.41-22.59).Conclusion: The results of this study show compensated cirrhosis does not pose an increased risk toward post-bariatric surgery mortality; however, hepatic decompensation increases the postsurgical risks.

Bariatric surgery and the liver-Mechanisms, benefits, and risks

The prevalence of obesity and metabolic diseases such as type 2 diabetes and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has risen dramatically over the past decades. At present, bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for this global health problem, through effects on food intake, gut hormone secretion, metabolic signaling pathways, and adipose tissue dysfunction. The liver occupies a central role in carbohydrate, protein, and lipid metabolism. Notably, a reduction in hepatic fat content and an improvement in hepatic insulin resistance are among the earliest beneficial effects of bariatric surgery, which has therefore emerged as an attractive treatment option for NAFLD. However, as the scope and popularity of weight loss surgery have expanded, new questions have arisen regarding its safety in patients with liver cirrhosis, the outcome of liver transplantation in patients with a history of bariatric surgery, and over incidental reports of liver failure following surgery. Studies in humans and rodents have also linked bariatric surgery to an increased risk of developing alcohol use disorder, a major risk factor for liver disease. This review integrates data from clinical and translational research to delineate both the beneficial impact of bariatric surgery on the liver and the potential risks involved.

Apprising the choice of bariatric surgery in patients with compensated cirrhosis with morbid obesity: results of a national analysis

Bariatric surgery (BS) was proved safe in carefully selected patients with compensated cirrhosis (CC). However, limited data exist on differential impact of bariatric surgery type on clinical outcomes and health care utilization. This retrospective study utilizes the 2010-2014 Nationwide Readmissions Database. We included obese adults with CC who underwent the two most commonly used BS, Roux-en-Y (RYGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Those with decompensation within 6 months of BS were excluded. Rates of hepatic decompensation (new-onset ascites, variceal bleed, encephalopathy, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, and/or hepatorenal syndrome), surgical complications, health care utilization, and mortality were compared between RYGB and LSG. Multivariable analysis was performed to fit various models. A total of 3032 patients with CC underwent BS, including 1864 (61.5%) RYGB and 1168 (38.5%) LSG. The majority (56%) of BS were performed at large, metropolitan teaching hospitals. There were no significant differences in various decompensations and surgical complications comparing RYGB to LSG. Healthcare utilization including index length of stay (RYGB: 3.4 days vs LSG: 3.0 days), 30-day readmission rate (RYGB: 9.5% vs LSG: 3.7%), and cost of admission (RYGB: $14,006 vs LSG: $12,523) were higher in RYGB (p values < 0.001). Index admission and calendar year mortality could not be analyzed due to the few number of events. Two types of bariatric surgeries in obese patients with compensated cirrhosis have similar rates of decompensated cirrhosis events and surgical complications. However, RYGB procedure incurred increased healthcare utilization. Therefore, LSG may be the preferred BS for patients with CC. Prospective, randomized studies comparing the types of BS are needed to confirm our observations.

Factors that make Bariatric Surgery Technically Challenging: A Survey of 370 Bariatric Surgeons

BACKGROUND

There is no published data on the factors bariatric surgeons think make bariatric surgery challenging. This study aimed to identify factors that bariatric surgeons feel and increase the technical complexity of bariatric surgery.

METHODS

Bariatric surgeons from around the world were invited to participate in a questionnaire-based survey on Survey Monkey®. An Average Weighted Score was calculated for each factor. A score of < 1.0 meant that the factor was perceived to make surgery technically easier.

RESULTS

Three hundred seventy bariatric and metabolic surgeons from 59 countries completed the survey. The top 10 factors that our respondents felt were most important for determining the technical difficulty of a procedure were inappropriate trocar placement (AWS 3.44), BMI above 60 (AWS 3.41), open bariatric surgery (AWS 3.26), less experienced bariatric anesthetist (AWS 3.18), liver cirrhosis (AWS 3), large liver (AWS 2.99), less experienced bariatric assistant (AWS 2.97), lower surgeon total bariatric surgery volume (AWS 2.95), lower surgeon specific procedure volume (AWS 2.85) and previous laparotomy (AWS 2.83), respectively. Respondents also felt that the younger patients (AWS 0.78), dedicated operating team (AWS 0.67), BMI less than 35 (AWS 0.54), and French position (AWS 0.45) actually make the surgery easier.

CONCLUSION

This survey is the first attempt to understand the factors which make bariatric surgery more difficult. Knowing the factors made the operation more challenging, led to better scheduling the potentially difficult patients to reduce the complications.

Comparison of Liver Recovery After Sleeve Gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y-Gastric Bypass

BACKGROUND

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a common condition in patients with obesity. Bariatric surgery has often been proposed as a viable treatment option, but the ideal surgical procedure remains unclear. Inconsistently, reports on postoperative deterioration of liver function put further doubt on which technique to apply. Aim of this study was to assess the impact of Roux-en-Y-gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) on the postoperative recovery of liver function.

METHODS

A total of 175 patients with obesity that underwent bariatric surgery in our institution were included in this prospective cohort study. BMI, laboratory values, and liver function capacity (using LiMAx) were assessed preoperatively and at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Generalized linear model (GLM) was performed to determine variables influencing liver function capacity after the operation.

RESULTS

Prior to operations, 64% of patients presented with a diminished liver function capacity, as measured by LiMAx test. Liver function capacity significantly recovered after 12 months in the SG group (300 μg/kg/h preop vs. 367 μg/kg/h postop) but not in the RYGB group (306 μg/kg/h preop vs. 349 μg/kg/h). Preoperative factors impeding liver function recovery included type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), weight, male sex, AST/thrombocyte ratio (APRI), and gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT).

CONCLUSION

Bariatric surgery, especially sleeve gastrectomy, leads to an improvement of liver function. However, in some patients with T2DM, higher preoperative weight and male sex postoperative deterioration of liver function capacity may occur.

Safety of metabolic and bariatric surgery in obese patients with liver cirrhosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

With the pandemic of obesity and the growing experience in metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS), the number of patients with obesity and liver cirrhosis undergoing MBS is increasing.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the morbidity and mortality following MBS in patients with obesity and liver cirrhosis.

SETTING

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

The published literature was systematically reviewed, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, for studies reporting outcomes of MBS among patients with liver cirrhosis. The predetermined endpoints were the overall complication after MBS, intraoperative complications, liver-related complications after MBS, all-cause 90-day mortality after MBS, and liver-related mortality post-MBS. The pooled weighted proportions for each of the endpoints was calculated using random effect meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 18 studies, including 471 patients with obesity and liver cirrhosis undergoing MBS, qualified for the final quantitative analysis. The mean age and mean body mass index (BMI) of the pooled patient cohort were 50.2 years and 47.2 kg/m². The pooled weighted proportions of the overall post-MBS complications, intraoperative complications, liver-related complications, overall 90-day mortality, and liver failure related mortality post MBS were 22.14% (CI_95%: 15.43%-29.55%), .08% (CI_95%: 0%-1.02%), 4.62% (CI_95%: 1.27%-9.30%), 0% (CI_95%: 0%-.44%), .08% (CI_95%: 0%-1.03%), respectively. Significantly lower postoperative complications were noted with sleeve gastrectomy (10.08% [95%CI: 5.14%-16%]) compared with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (31.53% [95%CI: 18.62%-45.68%]; (P = .02).

CONCLUSION

We found an overall low postoperative surgical and liver-related mortality post MBS among patients with obesity and liver cirrhosis. The overall postoperative complications and liver-related complications were higher among patients with liver cirrhosis than in noncirrhotic patients. Sleeve gastrectomy showed lower postoperative complications compared with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Bariatric Surgery in Cirrhotic Patients: a Matched Case-Control Study

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic bariatric surgery (LBS) in liver end-stage organ disease has been proven to improve organ function and patients' symptoms. A series of LBS in patients with cirrhosis have shown good results in weight loss, but increased risk of complications. Current literature is based on clinical series. This paper aims to compare LBS (69% gastric bypass) between patients with cirrhosis and without cirrhosis.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective 1:3 matched case-control study including bariatric patients with cirrhosis and without cirrhosis. Demographics, operative variables, postoperative complications, long-term weight loss, and comorbidity resolution were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Sixteen Child A patients were included in the patients with cirrhosis (PC) group and 48 in patients without cirrhosis (control) group. Mean age was 50 years; preoperative BMI was 39 ± 6.8 kg/m². Laparoscopic gastric bypass and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy were performed in 69% and 31%, respectively. Follow-up was 81% at 2 years for both groups. PC group had a higher rate of overall (31% vs. 6%; p < 0.05) and severe (Clavien-Dindo ≥ III; 13% vs. 0%; p = 0.013) complications than that of the control group. Mean %EWL of PC at 2 years of follow-up was 84.9%, without differences compared with that of the control group (83.1%). Comorbidity remission in PC was 14%, 50%, and 85% for hypertension, type 2 diabetes, and dyslipidemia, respectively. Patients without cirrhosis had a higher resolution rate of hypertension (65% vs. 14%, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

LBS is effective for weight loss and comorbidity resolution in patients with obesity and Child A liver cirrhosis. However, these results are accompanied by significantly increased risk of complications.