Primary SADI-S in Chinese with Diabetes and BMI < 35 kg/m2: a Retrospective Study with 2-Year Follow-up

Single Anastomosis Duodenoileostomy with Sleeve: A Comprehensive Review of Anatomy, Surgical Technique, and Outcomes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Single anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve (SADI-S) is a recently endorsed metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) procedure in the US. Despite its favorable characteristics, the utilization of SADI-S remains limited, accounting for a mere 0.25% of all MBS procedures performed. This review aims to offer an updated examination of the technique, while also presenting the safety and outcomes associated with SADI-S on both the short and long term.

RECENT FINDINGS

The safety of SADI-S is well-established, with short-term complication rates as low as 2.6%. A common channel length of 300 cm has consistently shown a lower incidence of malabsorption complications compared to shorter lengths. Bile reflux after SADI-S is relatively rare with an incidence of only 1.23%. SADI-S demonstrated sustained total weight loss (%TWL) at 5 years (37%) and 10 years (34%) postoperatively. Resolution of weight-related medical conditions was also significant after SADI-S, with remission rates of diabetes mellitus as high as 86.6% with over 5 years of follow-up. SADI-S is a safe and effective MBS procedure that has shown impressive and sustainable results in terms of weight loss and improvement in obesity-related medical conditions. Careful limb length selection is essential in minimizing the risk of nutritional deficiencies. SADI-S holds great promise as a valuable option for individuals seeking effective weight loss and improvement in associated health conditions.

Primary single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) versus sleeve gastrectomy to SADI conversions: a comparison study of prevalence and safety

BACKGROUND

Conversion from sleeve gastrectomy (SG) to single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass (SADI) is becoming increasingly common, but data regarding safety is of these conversions is scarce. As such, the objective of this study was to compare the 30-day rate of serious complications and mortality of primary SADI (p-SADI-S) with SG to SADI (SG-SADI) conversions.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study analyzed the MBSAQIP database. Patients undergoing p-SADI-S and SG-SADI were included. Data collection was limited to 2020 and 2021. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed between groups to determine if SG-SADI was an independent predictor of 30-day serious complications or mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 783 patients were included in this study, 488 (62.3%) underwent p-SADI-S and 295 (37.6%) underwent SG-SADI. The mean body mass index (BMI) at the time of surgery was lower in the SG-SADI cohort (45.1 vs 51.4 kg/m2, p < 0.001). Indications for revision in the SG-SADI cohort included weight recurrence (50.8%), inadequate weight loss (41.0%), other (3.0%), GERD (2.7%), and persistent comorbidities (2.5%). SG-SADI had longer operative times (156.7 vs 142.1 min, p < 0.001) and was not associated with a higher rate of serious complications (5.7 vs 6.9%, p = 0.508) compared to p-SADI-S. p-SADI-S was associated with a higher rate of pneumonia (1.2 vs 0.0%, p < 0.001), and SG-SADI was not correlated with higher rates of reoperation (3.0 vs 3.2%, p = 0.861), readmission (5.4 vs 5.5%, p = 0.948) and death (0.0 vs 0.2%, p = 0.437). On multivariable analysis, SG-SADI was not independently predictive of serious complications (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.52, p = 0.514) when adjusting for age, sex, BMI, comorbidities, and operative time.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of SG-SADI is high, representing 37.6% of SADI-S procedures. Conversion from sleeve to SADI, is safe, and as opposed to other studies of revisional bariatric surgery, has similar 30-day complication rates to primary SADI-S.

Outcomes of single anastomosis duodeno ileal bypass and single anastomosis stomach ileal bypass for type II diabetes: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Bariatric surgery has demonstrated long-term effectiveness in inducing weight loss and improving metabolic parameters for obesity. Single anastomosis duodeno-ileal (SADI) bypass and single anastomosis sleeve-ileal (SASI) bypass have both emerged as new promising bariatric procedures. In this paper, we review the existing literature and compare the outcomes of SADI and SASI bypass procedures in regard to weight loss, complication rate, and improvement of type II diabetes (T2DM). This has not yet been done in the preexisting literature.

AREAS COVERED

We conducted a systematic literature search of electronic databases focusing on weight loss outcomes, rate of complications and remission, or improvement of T2DM and other obesity-related comorbidities. Seventeen studies on SADI and nine studies on SASI were included. Both are similar in terms of surgical technique and have demonstrated fewer complications when compared to other bariatric procedures. Mean preoperative BMI was similar in both study groups: 46.4 kg/m2 in SADI and 48.8 kg/m2 in SASI. Mean %EWL at 12 months in the SADI group was 74.1% compared to 77.4% in the SASI group. Preoperative severity of T2DM appeared to be higher in the SASI patient group, with a higher preoperative HbA1c and fasting blood glucose levels. T2DM resolution was achieved in a significant proportion of both SADI and SASI patient populations (78.5% in SADI and 89.0% in SASI). Complication rates were comparable for both procedures.

EXPERT OPINION

Both SADI and SASI are effective in inducing weight loss at 12 months, with a low rate of major complications and mortality. From the studies included in this review, the SASI procedure had a higher impact on T2DM resolution compared to SADI.

Outcomes of totally robotic single-anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy: A large single-centre series

BACKGROUND

In recent years, the robot surgical system begins to be applied in single-anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S). However, only a few studies with very small sample size are present on robotic SADI-S.

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective study aimed to estimate the outcomes of totally robotic SADI-S.

METHODS

102 consecutive patients undergoing totally robotic SADI-S between March 2020 and December 2021 were included. Patient demographics, operative time, length of postoperative hospital stay, complications, conversion to laparotomy, reoperation, readmission, mortality, and postoperative weight loss were recorded to analyze the safety, effectiveness, and learning curve of totally robotic SADI-S. Based on the operative time, we evaluated the learning curve of robotic SADI-S by the cumulative sum (CUSUM) method.

RESULTS

The overall follow-up rate was 100%. The mean operative time was 186.13 ± 36.91 min. Short-term (≤30 days) complication was present in 6.9% (n = 7), of which major complications were identified in 2.9% (n = 3), including 2 gastric leakages and 1 postoperative acute respiratory failure. None of the patients experienced a long-term (＞30 days) complication. No conversion to laparotomy or deaths occurred during the study period. The mean percent of total weight loss (%TWL) at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months was 21.87 ± 4.44%, 32.49 ± 5.31%,40.86 ± 7.84%, and 44.64 ± 5.88%, respectively. The mean percent of excess weight loss (%EWL) at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months was 52.78 ± 16.99%,76.53 ± 17.99%,95.22 ± 18.59%, and 113.74 ± 23.30%, respectively. The cumulative sum (CUSUM) of operative time reached the first peak when the number of cases accumulated to the 16th case, then reached the second peak and continued to decline when the number of cases accumulated to the 27th case. Subsequently, all the patients were classified into the learning stage group (the first 27 patients) and the mastery stage group (the last 75 patients). Except for operative time, proportion of abdominal drainage tubes and lengths of postoperative hospital stay, there was no significant difference between the learning stage and mastery stage groups.

CONCLUSION

Totally robotic SADI-S seems to be feasible and effective in the treatment of morbid obesity, just like laparoscopic SADI-S. The learning curve of robotic SADI-S is 27 cases.

Effectiveness and Safety of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy for Weight Loss in Mild Obesity: Prospective Cohort Study with 3-Year Follow-up

PURPOSE

Patients with mild obesity especially in absence of associated medical problems (OAMP) are commonly managed by non-surgical approaches. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has proved itself to be effective and it is now the most performed weight loss procedure. We aimed to study the effectiveness and safety of LSG for weight loss in mild obesity.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study. Group A; BMI (30-34.9 kg/m²), and group B; BMI ≥ 40 or BMI ≥ 35 with OAMP. Demographic data, perioperative complications, % excess weight loss (EWL), % total weight loss (TWL), nutritional profile, and evolution of OAMP were recorded and statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 250 patients, with 80 patients (32%) in group A, and 170 (68%) in group B. The majority were female. The mean preoperative weight, BMI, and excess weight were 90.1 ± 9.52, 32.7 ± 1.4, and 21.5 ± 4.9 in group A, and 129.88 ± 26.12, 47.8 ± 8.2, and 62.3 ± 23.6 kg in group B respectively. The low BMI group had significantly lower OAMP, with higher pre-LSG non-surgical procedures rate. Overall post-operative morbidity rate was significantly higher in group B. %TWL was significantly lower in low BMI group. Nutritional profile was within the normal range in both groups at 3-year follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is a safe and effective weight loss solution for mild obesity with better outcome than for higher BMI. Further studies are warranted to reconsider NIH's statement for medicolegal aspects, and for matching the current changes in bariatric surgery practice, safety evidence, and patients' demand.

Long-Term Weight Loss Outcome of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Predicted by the Percentage of Excess Weight Loss at 6 Months in Chinese Patients with Body Mass Index ≥ 32.5 Kg/m2

PURPOSE

To evaluate the predictive effect of the initial weight loss on the long-term weight loss in Chinese patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 32.5 kg/m² who underwent LSG.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The follow-up was completed via phone or WeChat for outpatients and at the hospital for inpatients. We evaluated the BMI, percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL), and type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia statuses. Linear and logistic regression analyses were performed on the relationship between the initial and long-term weight loss. The optimal cut-off value was determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

RESULTS

We enrolled 307 patients, with a median preoperative BMI of 39.68 (35.68, 45.47) kg/m². %EWL ≥ 50% was regarded as successful weight loss, and 76.55% of the patients lost their weight successfully. (Reviewer #1, comment #4) %EWL at 6 months and 5 years were positively correlated (P < 0.001). Further, the following linear equation could express the relationship: (%EWL_{5 years} = 29.193 + 0.526 × %EWL_{6 months}). %EWL ≥ 58.57% at 6 months was the best predictor of successful weight loss at 5 years after LSG (Reviewer #1, comment #5) (sensitivity, 73.62%; specificity, 73.61%; AUC value, 0.780). Internal verification of the prediction model revealed satisfactory results in terms of discrimination and calibration.

CONCLUSION

In Chinese patients with BMI ≥ 32.5 kg/m² who underwent LSG, %EWL at 6 months and 5 years were correlated. %EWL ≥ 58.57% at 6 months was a predictor of successful long-term weight loss.

Retrospective Comparison of SADI-S Versus RYGB in Chinese with Diabetes and BMI< 35kg/m2: a Propensity Score Adjustment Analysis

BACKGROUND

As a modification of the duodenal switch (DS), single-anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) has recently become very popular and is successful for weight loss and T2DM remission. However, current studies have been mostly aimed at patients with severe obesity.

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we firstly compare primary SADI-S to the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) in Chinese with diabetes and BMI< 35 kg/m2.

METHODS

Using a propensity score (PS) matching analysis, we analyzed all patients with diabetes and BMI< 35 kg/m2 who underwent primary SADI-S or RYGB. All surgeries were conducted by a single surgeon at a Chinese center from June 2017 to January 2019.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients who underwent SADI-S and 65 patients who underwent RYGB were included in our analysis. Of these, 26 (100%) of patients in the SADI-S group and 43 (66%) of patients in the RYGB group completed the 24-month follow-up. No severe perioperative complication was observed in either group. There was a statistically higher percentage of total weight loss with SADI-S at the 2-year follow-up when compared to RYGB (p = 0.017 after PS correction). After PS adjustment, 76.5% of patients in the SADI-S group and 82.4% of patients in the RYGB group achieved complete remission of T2DM (p = 1.000). Nutritional outcomes were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSION

In Chinese with diabetes and BMI< 35 kg/m2, with comparable T2DM remission and nutritional outcomes, primary SADI-S allows for better weight loss than RYGB. Compared with RYGB, SADI-S is also a safe, effective, and feasible treatment for these patients.