Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Utilization and Safety in the United States

The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on patient selection and access to care, approach type, and postoperative outcomes in bariatric surgery

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic had affected the health systems across the world since early 2020 with a concern about access to medical care during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to examine how the COVID-19 pandemic influenced patient selection, approach type, and postoperative outcomes in elective bariatric surgery.

SETTING

United States.

METHODS

Data from the MBSAQIP database for the years 2016-2020 were queried. Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Fisher's exact test were employed for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Postoperative outcomes within 30 days were assessed separately and based on the Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification of III-V. χ2 test and logistic regression were used to compare outcomes between procedure and approach types, as well as surgical operation periods.

RESULTS

A total of 741,620 patients underwent robotic and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric-bypass. The cases performed in 2020 exhibited lower comorbidities and postoperative complications compared to prepandemic years, regardless of the approach type. Notably, the proportion of White patients decreased during the pandemic, while there was an increase in the number of African American and Hispanic patients who had bariatric surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who underwent bariatric surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic appeared to be healthier with fewer comorbidities and experienced fewer adverse postoperative outcomes compared to those who had surgery prior to the pandemic. This study highlights the limited access to bariatric surgery for high-risk patients during the pandemic.

Effect of COVID-19 changes on outcomes and socioeconomic disparities following metabolic and bariatric surgery

BACKGROUND

We previously showed worse outcomes among lower socioeconomic status (SES) groups following metabolic/bariatric surgery (MBS). In light of healthcare changes in response to COVID-19, this study aims to evaluate post-pandemic MBS outcomes and determine if prior socioeconomic disparities persisted in the post-COVID era.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of patients undergoing primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) between 2015 and 2022 was performed. Patients were stratified into pre- and post-COVID groups. Post-COVID cohort was further stratified into high (HT) and low (LT) tier status based on Distressed Communities Index, a geocoded composite measure of SES. Preoperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes were compared between pre- and post-COVID cohorts, as well as between post-COVID HT and LT groups.

RESULTS

Of 709 patients, 82.9% were pre-COVID and 17.1% were post-COVID. Post-COVID cohort had greater rate of public insurance (46% vs. 37%, p < 0.001), longer wait time to surgery (mean 358 ± 609.8 days vs 241.9 ± 368.5 days, p = 0.045), and were more likely to undergo RYGB (69% vs. 56%, p = 0.010). Post-COVID patients also had lower risk of any complications on multivariable analysis (OR 0.599, 95% CI 0.372-0.963), had higher follow-up rates at post-discharge (95.8% vs 79.7%, p < 0.005), 6-month (93% vs. 82%, p < 0.001) and 12-month visits (75% vs. 63%, p = 0.005), and lost more weight at 12 months (67% excess weight loss (%EWL) vs. 58%EWL, p = 0.002). Among post-COVID HT and LT cohorts, previously seen disparities in complications were no longer seen. Finally, there were no differences in weight or follow-up rates between post-COVID HT and LT.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-COVID changes to MBS care have resulted in improved short-term outcomes and reduced disparities for patients of lower SES. Further studies are needed to identify these positive factors to perpetuate practice patterns that optimize care for patients of all socioeconomic status.

Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Utilization Trends in the United States: Evidence From 2012 to 2021 National Electronic Medical Records Network

Background

Bariatric surgery has evolved over the past 2 decades yet assessing trends of bariatric surgery utilization in the growing eligible population is lacking.

Aim

This study aimed to update the trends in bariatric surgery utilization, changes in types of procedures performed, and the characteristics of patients who underwent bariatric surgery in the United States, using real-world data.

Method

This retrospective descriptive observational study was conducted using the TriNetX, a federated electronic medical records network from 2012 to 2021, for adult patients 18 years old or older who had bariatric surgery. Descriptive statistical analysis was conducted to assess patients' demographics and characteristics. Annual secular trend analyses were conducted for the annual rate of bariatric surgery, and the specific procedural types and proportions of laparoscopic surgeries.

Results

A steady increase in the number of procedures performed in the United States over the first 6 years of the study, a plateau for the following 2 years, and then a decline in 2020 and 2021 (during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic). The annual rate of bariatric surgery was lowest in 2012 at 59.2 and highest in 2018 at 79.6 surgeries per 100,000 adults. During the study period, 96.2% to 98.8% of procedures performed annually were conducted laparoscopically as opposed to the open technique. Beginning in 2012, the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) procedure fell to represent only 17.1% of cases in 2018, along with a sharp decline in the adjustable gastric band (AGB) procedure, replaced by a sharp increase in the sleeve gastrectomy (SG) procedure to represent over 74% of cases in 2018.

Conclusions

Bariatric surgery utilization in the United States showed a moderate decline in the number of RYGB procedures, which was offset by a substantial increase in the number of SG procedures and a precipitous drop in the annual number of AGB procedures.

A Comparative Analysis of Safety and Efficacy of Bariatric Surgery During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Pre-Pandemic Period: Insights from the Tehran Obesity Treatment Study

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic has raised global health concerns and posed challenges for postoperative follow-up care for patients undergoing bariatric surgery due to social distancing rules.

METHODS

This was a cohort study on patients with morbid obesity who underwent bariatric surgery and had been enrolled in Tehran Obesity Treatment Study. Patients who had surgery between March 2020 and March 2021 were classified as those undergoing the procedure amid the COVID-19 pandemic, while those who had surgery between March 2017 and March 2018 were categorized as the pre-pandemic group.

RESULTS

The study included 982 patients in the pre-COVID-19 pandemic group and 602 patients in the COVID-19 pandemic group, with mean ages of 39.61 and 39.51 years, respectively. After adjusting for preoperative body mass index (BMI) and surgery type, the patients who underwent surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic demonstrated comparable results to the pre-COVID-19 group in terms of total weight loss %, excess weight loss %, BMI reduction, and fat mass reduction during the 12-month postoperative period. Additionally, the rate of complications with a grade≥III based on the Clavien-Dindo classification was significantly lower in patients who underwent surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic. Notably, there were no deaths reported in either group.

CONCLUSION

Despite social isolation and unfavorable lifestyle modifications, bariatric surgery-induced weight loss after one year was the same in patients undergoing the procedure either before or after the implementation of social distancing measures. More research is needed to analyze the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on the long-term outcomes of bariatric surgery.

Bariatric surgery provision in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: retrospective cohort study of a national registry

BACKGROUND

When surgery resumed following the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, guidelines recommended the prioritization of patients with greater obesity-related co-morbidities and/or higher body mass index.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to record the effect of the pandemic on total number, patient demographics, and perioperative outcomes of elective bariatric surgery patients in the United Kingdom.

SETTING AND METHODS

The United Kingdom National Bariatric Surgical Registry was used to identify patients who underwent elective bariatric surgery during the pandemic (1 yr from April 1, 2020). Characteristics of this group were compared with those of a pre-pandemic cohort. Primary outcomes were case volume, case mix, and providers. National Health Service cases were analyzed for baseline health status and perioperative outcomes. Fisher exact, χ2, and Student t tests were used as appropriate.

RESULTS

The total number of cases decreased to one third of pre-pandemic volume (8615 to 2930). The decrease in operating volume varied, with 36 hospitals (45%) experiencing a 75%-100% reduction. Cases performed in the National Health Service fell from 74% to 53% (P < .0001). There was no change in baseline body mass index (45.2 ± 8.3 kg/m2 from 45.5 ± 8.3 kg/m2; P = .23) or prevalence of type 2 diabetes (26% from 26%; P = .99). Length of stay (median 2 d) and surgical complication rate (1.4% from 2.0%; relative risk = .71; 95% CI .45-1.12; P = .13) were unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS

In the context of a dramatic reduction in elective bariatric surgery due to the COVID-19 pandemic, patients with more severe co-morbidities were not prioritized for surgery. These findings should inform preparation for future crises.