One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Compared with Sleeve Gastrectomy in Elderly Patients: Safety and Long-term Outcomes

Metabolic Bariatric surgery in People with Obesity aged ≥65 Years

Obesity management guidelines recommend metabolic bariatric surgery for individuals with body mass index (BMI) ≥35 kg/m2, regardless of the presence of any obesity-related comorbidity; and for individuals with BMI 30-34.9 kg/m2 with metabolic diseases. Older age is not in itself a contraindication for bariatric surgeries, which can be performed after careful selection and assessment, to decrease the risks of postoperative complications. An essential amount of data has accumulated about bariatric surgery results for persons aged ≥60 years; but data are limited though increasingly accumulating for the ≥65-year-old population. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y-gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy have been the preferred bariatric procedures for older adults with obesity, as for younger patients. This review summarizes the safety and efficacy of bariatric surgery for individuals aged ≥65 years with obesity, and the efforts that have been invested to improve the perioperative and long-term consequences.

Esophagogastric cancer surgery characteristics and outcomes in bariatric patients, compared with non-bariatric patients

BACKGROUND

The association between bariatric surgery and esophagogastric cancer (EGC) is debated. This study aimed to assess EGC characteristics and surgery outcomes comparing bariatric and non-bariatric patients.

METHODS

Single-center retrospective analysis of prospective EGC surgery database.

RESULTS

EGC-surgery was performed in 269 patients, classified as bariatric (N.=10, 3.3%), and non-bariatric (N.=259, 96.6%) groups. Non-bariatric group was sub-classified into body mass index (BMI) <35 kg/m2 (N.=244) and >35 kg/m2 (N.=15). BMI was 35.3±5.6 vs. 25.7±16.1 and 37.8±8.7 kg/m2 in bariatric vs. non-bariatric-BMI <35 and >35, respectively (P<0.001). Bariatric patients were significantly younger (56.75±11 vs. 71±10 and 68.38±8.2 years; P<0.001). They tended to have lower rates of diabetes mellitus (30% vs. 43.9% and 73.3%; P=0.05) and significantly lower hypertension rates (50%, vs.86.5% and 93.3%, P<0.004). Bariatric procedures were performed 11.3 years (IQR 5.5-16.5) prior to EGC-surgery. Tumor characteristics were statistically comparable except a significantly higher number of positive LN in the bariatric group (6.9±13.6 vs. 2.7±4.9 and 1.9±4.8; P=0.006), and more bariatric patients received adjuvant treatment (P=0.035). Postoperative major complication rates (0% vs. 25.8%, and 33.3%; P=0.14) and length of hospital stay (14.1±15.3, vs. 23±28.5, and 21±18 days; P=0.59) were comparable. There was no significant difference in Disease- free survival (P=0.42) or overall survival (P=0.48) between patient-groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Bariatric patients were diagnosed with EGC at a younger age, and tended to have worse nodal involvement. Although outcomes were comparable, clinical and endoscopic surveillance seem important as EGC can occur 10 years or earlier than in non-bariatric patients.

Technical Variations and Considerations around OAGB in IFSO-APC and IFSO-MENAC Chapters, an Expert Survey

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the technical variations of one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) among IFSO-APC and MENAC experts.

BACKGROUND

The multitude of technical variations and patient selection challenges among metabolic and bariatric surgeons worldwide necessitates a heightened awareness of these issues. Understanding different perspectives and viewpoints can empower surgeons performing OAGB to adapt their techniques, leading to improved outcomes and reduced complications.

METHODS

The scientific team of IFSO-APC, consisting of skilled bariatric and metabolic surgeons specializing in OAGB, conducted a confidential online survey. The survey aimed to assess technical variations and considerations related to OAGB within the IFSO-APC and IFSO-MENAC chapters. A total of 85 OAGB experts participated in the survey, providing their responses through a 35-question online format. The survey took place from January 1, 2024, to February 15, 2024.

RESULTS

Most experts do not perform OAGB for children and adolescents younger than 18 years. Most experts create the gastric pouch over a 36-40-F bougie and prefer to create a gastrojejunostomy, at the posterior wall of the gastric pouch. An anti-reflux suture during OAGB is performed in all patients by 51.8% of experts. Most experts set a common limb length of > 4 m in revisional and conversional OAGBs to prevent nutritional complications.

CONCLUSION

The ongoing debate among metabolic and bariatric surgeons regarding the technical variations and patient selection in OAGB remains a significant point of discussion. This survey demonstrated the variations in technical aspects and patient selection for OAGB among MBS surgeons in the IFSO-APC and IFSO-MENAC chapters. Standardizing the OAGB technique is crucial to ensure optimal safety and efficacy in this procedure.

Safety and Efficacy of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass in Children and Adolescents: a 5-Year Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Childhood obesity is an important worldwide issue of serious medical and social concern. One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is an approved, effective, and long-lasting procedure for weight loss and the remission of obesity-associated medical problems in the adult patients, but its efficacy and safety in children and adolescents are still on debate. This study aimed to evaluate safety and efficacy of OAGB compare to SG and RYGB during a 5-year follow-up.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study on children and adolescents with severe obesity who underwent primary OAGB, sleeve gastrectomy (SG), and Roux-e-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) at an academic hospital, between March 2016 and December 2020.

RESULTS

Two hundred twenty-eight patients with 24 to 60 months of follow-up including 107 SG, 37 RYGB, and 84 OAGB were included in the final analysis. The mean age, preoperative weight, and BMI were 15.71 ± 2.09 years (range, 9-18 years), 126.3 ± 22.0 kg (74.5-215 kg), and 45.1 ± 6.9 kg/ m2 (36.4-79.3 kg/m2), respectively. The mean of follow-up was 30.05 ± 19.98 months. The mean of ∆BMI was 30.2 ± 5.1, 30.0 ± 5.4, and 31.1 ± 6.8 at 12th, 36th, and 60th months postoperative. At the 60-month follow-up, there were statistically significant differences in ΔBMI between SG and OAGB and SG and RYGB.

CONCLUSION

OAGB is a safe and effective procedure for the treatment of obesity in children and adolescents in 24 to 60 months follow-ups.