Robot-assisted surgery in children: current status

Robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for mediastinal tumours in children: a single-centre retrospective study of 149 patients

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this retrospective study was to summarize our experience in performing robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) for mediastinal tumours in children to investigate its safety and feasibility.

METHODS

This retrospective study involved 149 patients with mediastinal tumours who were hospitalized in the Department of Thoracic Surgery of Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, and underwent RATS for tumour resection from March 2021 to November 2022. Information on patient age, weight, tumour size, surgical incision selection, operative time, intraoperative bleeding, intraoperative complications, length of hospital stay, rate of conversion to thoracotomy and follow-up conditions were summarized.

RESULTS

All 149 surgeries were successfully completed with no cases of mortality. There were 77 male and 72 female patients, with a mean age of 5.9 years (range: 6 months-16 years, 8 months) and a mean weight of 23.6 kg (8.0-72.0 kg). The mean maximum tumour diameter was 5.5 cm (2.0-12.0 cm), the mean operative time was 106.7 min (25.0-260.0 min), the mean intraoperative bleeding volume was 11.3 ml (1.0-400.0 ml) and the mean hospital stay was 7.2 days (4.0-14.0 days). All patients recovered well with no cases of tumour recurrence or mortality during the postoperative follow-up period (3-23 months).

CONCLUSIONS

RATS is safe and feasible to apply in children with mediastinal tumours who are >6 months of age and weigh more than 8 kg in terms of short-term outcomes, but longer-term follow-up is needed to fully evaluate the benefits. For cases that are associated with greater surgical difficulty and risk, a comprehensive surgical plan should be fully prepared in advance of surgery.

Robotic-assisted colectomy in children: a comparative study with laparoscopic surgery

The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of laparoscopic and robotic-assisted colectomy in children. All children who underwent a colectomy with a laparoscopic (LapC) or robotic-assisted (RobC) approach in our institution (January 2010-March 2023) were included. Demographics, surgical data, and post-operative outcomes within 30 days were collected. Additional cost related to the robotic approach was calculated. Comparisons were performed using Fisher tests for categorical variables and Mann-Whitney tests for continuous variables. A total of 55 colectomies were performed: 31 LapC and 24 RobC (median age: 14.9 years). Main indications included: inflammatory bowel disease (n = 36, 65%), familial adenomatous polyposis (n = 6, 11%), sigmoid volvulus (n = 5, 9%), chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction (n = 3, 5%). LapC included 22 right, 4 left, and 5 total colectomies. RobC included 15 right, 4 left, and 5 total colectomies. Robotic-assisted surgery was associated with increased operative time (3 h vs 2.5 h, p = 0.02), with a median increase in operative time of 36 min. There were no conversions. Post-operative complications occurred in 35% of LapC and 38% of RobC (p = 0.99). Complications requiring treatment under general anesthesia (Clavien-Dindo 3) occurred in similar rates (23% in LapC vs 13% in RobC, p = 0.49). Length of hospitalization was 10 days in LapC and 8.5 days in RobC (p = 0.39). The robotic approach was associated with a median additional cost of 2156€ per surgery. Robotic-assisted colectomy is as safe and feasible as laparoscopic colectomy in children, with similar complication rates but increased operative times and cost.

Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery in Children

Currently, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) includes conventional laparo-thoracoscopic surgery and robot-assisted surgery (RAS) or robotic surgery. Robotic surgery is performed with robotic devices, for example the Da Vinci system from Intuitive Surgical, which has a miniaturized camera capable of image magnification, a three-dimensional image of the surgical field, and the instruments are articulated with 7 degrees of freedom of movement, and the surgeon operates in a sitting position at a surgical console near the patient. Robotic surgery has gained an enormous surge in use on adults, but it has been slowly accepted for children, although it offers important advantages in complex surgeries. The areas of application of robotic surgery in the pediatric population include urological, general surgery, thoracic, oncological, and otorhinolaryngology, the largest application has been in urological surgery. There is evidence that robotic surgery in children is safe and it is important to offer its benefits. Intraoperative complications are rare, and the frequency of postoperative complications ranges from 0–15%. Recommendations for the implementation of a pediatric robotic surgery program are included. The future will be fascinating with upcoming advancements in robotic surgical systems, the use of artificial intelligence, and digital surgery.

Robotic lobectomy in children with severe bronchiectasis: A worthwhile new technology

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Lobectomy is required in children affected by non-responsive, symptomatic, localized bronchiectasis, but inflammation makes thoracoscopy challenging. We present the first published series of robotic-assisted pulmonary lobectomy in children with bronchiectasis.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients who underwent pulmonary lobectomy for severe localized bronchiectasis (2014-2019) via thoracoscopic versus robotic lobectomy. Four 5 mm ports were used for thoracoscopy; a four-arm approach was used for robotic surgery (Da Vinci Surgical Xi System, Intuitive Surgical, California).

RESULTS

Eighteen children were operated (robotic resection, n = 7; thoracoscopy, n = 11) with infected congenital pulmonary malformation, primary ciliary dyskinesia, and post-viral infection. There were no conversions to open surgery with robotic surgery, but five with thoracoscopy. Total operative time was significantly longer with robotic versus thoracoscopic surgery (mean 247 ± 50 versus 152 ± 57 min, p = 0.008). There were no significant differences in perioperative complications, length of thoracic drainage, or total length of stay (mean 7 ± 2 versus 8 ± 3 days, respectively). No blood transfusions were required. Two thoracoscopic patients had a type-3 postoperative complication.

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric robotic lung lobectomy is feasible and safe, with excellent visualization and bi-manual hand-wrist dissection - useful properties in difficult cases of infectious pathologies. However, instrumentation dimensions limit use in smaller thoraxes.

Robot-assisted anorectal pull-through for anorectal malformations with rectourethral and rectovesical fistula: feasibility and short-term outcome

BACKGROUND

Multiple structures in the anorectal area are closely related to defecation, voiding and sexual function. Although laparoscopic-assisted anorectal pull-through is widely accepted as a minimally invasive surgical technique, controversy still exists for ARMs with rectourethral fistulas. Intraoperative injuries more or less involve the perirectal sphincters and neurovascular tissue.

METHODS

Seventeen selected infants with ARMs underwent robot-assisted anorectal pull-through (RAARP) between October 2016 and January 2018. The application of nerve- and sphincter-sparing technique in RAARP was detailed. The feasibility and early outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

All procedures were completed without conversion. The robotic system facilitated clear dissections between different anatomical layers. Under direct vision, the fistula was easier to repair, and the rectal pouch was precisely placed in the center of the striated muscle complex. During the follow-up of 11.6 months, 13 patients resumed normal defecation. The other four children experienced mild constipation or fecal incontinence. Their continence and defecation functions showed favorable evolution.

CONCLUSION

RAARP is a safe and effective alternative for the treatment of ARMs, which provides an advantage in further minimizing the injury to perirectal nerves and sphincters.

Roboterassistierte (RA-)Kinderchirurgie: Nierenbeckenplastiken mit dem Da-Vinci-Roboter

Hintergrund

Im Ausland stellt die roboterassistierte (RA-)Chirurgie und hier besonders die RA-Urologie in der Kinderchirurgie bereits eine wichtige Alternative zu konventionellen Eingriffen (offen, laparoskopisch, laparoskopisch-assistiert) dar. Für Deutschland wurden dazu erst wenige Untersuchungen publiziert.

Ziel der Arbeit (Fragestellung)

Im Sinne einer vergleichenden Serie sollten die ersten Fälle von RA-Nierenbecken-Plastiken der Kinderchirurgie der Universitätsmedizin Göttingen im Vergleich zu konventionell laparoskopisch-assistierten (LAA) vor dem Hintergrund der internationalen Literatur evaluiert werden.

Material und Methoden

Es werden retrospektiv die ersten 13 RA und 14, unter Berücksichtigung des Patientenalters ausgewählte, konventionell LAA Anderson-Hynes-Plastiken hinsichtlich Operationsdauer, Krankenhausverweildauer, Alter der Patienten, Komplikationen und Rezidiven untersucht. Laparoskopisch-assistierte Operationen werden laparoskopisch durchgeführt, lediglich die Anlage der Anastomose erfolgt über einen kleinen Flankenschnitt extrakorporal. Roboterassistierte Eingriffe verlaufen gänzlich laparoskopisch.

Ergebnisse

Für die Operationsdauer ergab sich kein signifikanter Unterschied (111,54 min vs. 117,64 min). Die Liegezeit fiel für RA-Eingriffe signifikant kürzer aus (5,85 Tage vs. 10,0 Tage). Die Altersverteilung ergab für die RA-Kohorte ein Mittel von 52,23 Monaten und für die LAA 30,29 Monate. Die Komplikationsrate betrug 15,38 % (Harntransportstörung, paralytischer Ileus und Dislokation des PDK sowie Omentumprolaps), die Rezidivrate 7,69 % für die RA Eingriffe. Für die LAA operierten Patienten und Patientinnen lagen die Werte bei 7,14 % (Dislokation der Doppel-J-Schiene nach kranial) und 14,28 %.

Diskussion

Die ersten RA-Nierenbecken-Plastiken unserer Klinik wiesen im internationalen Vergleich ähnliche Werte für Operationsdauer, Komplikations- sowie Rezidivrate auf. Es zeigten sich ein ähnliches Outcome für beide Operationsverfahren und keine signifikante Zeitersparnis durch Verwendung des OP-Roboters. Im Gegensatz dazu fiel die Krankenhausverweildauer nach RA-Eingriffen signifikant kürzer aus als nach LAA-Operationen. In der internationalen Literatur finden sich jedoch auch insgesamt kürzere Liegezeiten. Insgesamt stellen RA-Nierenbecken-Plastiken eine wertvolle Alterative zu LAA-Verfahren dar.

Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery: Prospective Series of 186 Pediatric Surgeries

Objective: We present the applications and experiences of robot-assisted laparoscopic and thoracoscopic surgery (RALTS) in pediatric surgery. Materials and Methods: A prospective, observational, and longitudinal study was conducted from March 2015 to March 2018 that involved a non-random sample of a pediatric population that was treated with RALTS. The parameters examined were: gender, age, weight, height, diagnoses, surgical technique, elapsed time of console surgery, estimated bleeding, need for hemotransfusion, complications, surgical conversions, postoperative hospital stay, and follow-up. The Clavien-Dindo classification of complications was used. The surgical system used was the da Vinci model, Si version (Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA. U.S.A), with measures of central tendency. Results: In a 36-months period, 186 RALTS cases were performed, in 147 pediatric patients and an adult; 53.23% were male, and the remaining were female. The average age was 83 months, ranging from 3.5 to 204 months, plus one adult patient of 63 years. The stature was an average of 116.6 cm, with a range of 55-185 cm; the average weight was 26.9 kg, with a range of 5-102 kg; the smallest patient at 3.5 months was 55 cm in stature and weighed 5.5 kg. We performed 41 different surgical techniques, grouped in 4 areas: urological 91, gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary (GI-HB) 84, thoracic 6, and oncological 5. The console surgery time was 137.2 min on average, ranging from 10 to 780 min. Surgeon 1 performed 154 operations (82.8%), and the remainder were performed by Surgeon 2, with a conversion rate of 3.76%. The most commonly performed surgeries were: pyeloplasty, fundoplication, diaphragmatic plication, and removal of benign tumors, by area. Hemotransfusion was performed for 4.83%, and complications occurred in 2.68%. The average postoperative stay was 2.58 days, and the average follow-up was 23.5 months. The results of the 4 areas were analyzed in detail. Conclusion: RALTS is safe and effective in children. An enormous variety of surgeries can be safely performed, including complex hepatobiliary, and thoracic surgery in small children. There are few published prospective series describing RALTS in the pediatric population, and most only describe urological surgery. It is important to offer children the advantages and safety of minimal invasion with robotic assistance; however, this procedure has only been slowly accepted and utilized for children. It is possible to implement a robust program of pediatric robotic surgery where multiple procedures are performed.

Robotic-assisted anorectal pull-through for anorectal malformations

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Many reports have addressed the feasibility and safety of using robotic surgery in children. To our knowledge, no published report has described the use of a surgical robot in the repair of anorectal malformations (ARMs).

METHODS

Included children underwent robotic-assisted repair of ARMs with rectourethral fistula between April 2006 and March 2010 at King Khalid University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, using the da Vinci Surgical System. Their medical records were reviewed with respect to demographic data, associated anomalies, techniques and operative procedures, complications, outcomes, and follow-up.

RESULTS

Five male infants (mean age, 6.6 months) underwent robotic-assisted repair of ARMs with rectourethral fistula using the Georgeson technique. The fistulae were divided and ligated in 4 patients and was left open in 1. All procedures were successfully completed without conversion to an open technique. One patient developed left-sided epididymo-orchitis postoperatively. All the patients had their colostomy closed. The follow-up ranged from 6 to 36 months. Fecal continence was difficult to assess in 2 patients. Two patients have voluntary bowel movements without soiling. One infant has fecal soiling and is on a laxative/enema for constipation.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotically assisted repair of ARMs with rectourethral fistula is feasible and safe. It offers a good alternative to the criterion standard, posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP), for repair of ARMs with rectourethral fistula. More patients and a longer follow-up period are needed for further evaluation of this novel approach.