1
|
Kochkin A, Kalfountzos C, Gallyamov E, Biktimirov R, Sanzharov A, Sergeev V, Popov S, Dal Moro F, Tokas T, Gözen AS. Laparoscopic intracorporeal ileal ureter replacement: multi-institutional data from 102 patients. MINIM INVASIV THER 2024; 33:140-146. [PMID: 38265869 DOI: 10.1080/13645706.2024.2302889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To present long-term results of our laparoscopic intracorporeal ileal ureter replacement (LIUR) cohort, including more complex cases of laparoscopic ileocalycostomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS We collected records of patients undergoing LIUR. Follow-up included a chemical profile and urine cultures. Imaging consisted of renal ultrasonography, excretory urography, cystography, and computer tomographic or magnetic resonance urography. RESULTS One hundred and two patients were included. Stricture location was left (46.1%), right (39.2%), or bilateral (14.7%). No open conversion was performed. Seventy-four patients (72.5%) underwent a total ureteral unit removal. The mean operative time was 289.4 (120 - 680) minutes. The estimated blood loss was 185.2 (10-400) mL. Three patients had intraoperative complications, and fifteen had early postoperative complications. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 12.2 (7-35) days. The mean follow-up duration period was 37.7 (12-162) months. Most patients' follow-up was uneventful (88%), and seven patients presented with Grade 2 late complications. CONCLUSIONS Intracorporeal laparoscopic ileal ureteral replacement in cases of extensive ureteral lesions offers optimal long-term outcomes and a low complication rate. Ileocalycostomy constitutes a viable option in the small group of patients with long proximal ureteral strictures and intrarenal pelvis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexey Kochkin
- Department of Urology, Urological Center of Russian Railways Hospital, Privolzhskiy Research Medical University, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia
| | - Christos Kalfountzos
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, Viopolis, Larissa, Greece
| | - Eduard Gallyamov
- Department of Common Surgery, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Rafael Biktimirov
- Department of Urology, Federal Clinical Center of High Medical Technology of Federal Medical Biological Agency of Russia, Moscow, Russia
| | - Andrey Sanzharov
- Department of Urology, Federal Scientific and Clinical Center for Specialized Methods of Medical Care and Medical Technologies of Federal Medical Biological Agency, Moscow, Russia
| | - Vladimir Sergeev
- Department of Urology, Russian State Research Center - Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency of Russia, Moscow, Russia
| | - Sergey Popov
- Department of Urology, I.I. Mechkikov North - Western State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - Fabrizio Dal Moro
- Urology Clinic, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Theodoros Tokas
- Department of Urology, University General Hospital of Heraklion, University of Crete, Medical School, Heraklion, Greece
- Department of Urology, Training and Research in Urological Surgery and Technology (T.R.U.S.T.)-Group, Hall in Tirol, Austria
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Grosso AA, DI Maida F, Mari A, Campi R, Crisci A, Vignolini G, Masieri L, Carini M, Minervini A. Totally intracorporeal robotic ileal ureter replacement: focus on surgical technique and outcomes. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2021; 73:532-539. [PMID: 33439579 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.20.04191-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of the present study was to describe our totally intracorporeal robotic ileal ureter replacement technique, reporting perioperative and mid-term results and compare it with previous similar experiences, specifically focusing on technical considerations. METHODS Three patients were submitted to robotic ileal ureter substitution for long ureteral defects in our institution during 2019. The procedures were carried out fully intracorporeally. Two patients received a complete replacement of the urinary tract using an ileal segment, while in one patient the lower ureteral stump was maintained, and an ileal-ureter anastomosis was performed distally. Patients' baseline characteristics, as well as perioperative and mid-term results were collected. A detailed description of the technique is reported and compared with prior similar experiences. RESULTS Median operative time was 270 (range 240-300) min. No Clavien-Dindo complication >2 was collected. All patients experienced a fast return to oral intake and canalization. Antegrade pyelography, performed a 1-month follow-up, revealed full passage of the medium contrast in those patients submitted to complete ileal ureter replacement while, in the third one, stenosis at the level of ileal-ureter anastomoses was found. CONCLUSIONS Robotic ileal ureter replacement can be performed completely intracorporeal with optimal results and limited complication rate, in selected cases. According to our considerations, specific surgical steps are needed to reduce the risks related to this procedure, including avoiding partial ileal substitution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio A Grosso
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy -
| | - Fabrizio DI Maida
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Andrea Mari
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Riccardo Campi
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Alfonso Crisci
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Graziano Vignolini
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Masieri
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Marco Carini
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Andrea Minervini
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Elbers JR, Rodríguez Socarrás M, Rivas JG, Autran AM, Esperto F, Tortolero L, Carrion DM, Sancha FG. Robotic Repair of Ureteral Strictures: Techniques and Review. Curr Urol Rep 2021; 22:39. [PMID: 34105032 DOI: 10.1007/s11934-021-01056-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To provide an overview and description of the different surgical techniques for the robotic repair of ureteral strictures. RECENT FINDINGS The robotic repair of ureteral stenosis has emerged as a useful option for treating strictures unsuitable for endoscopic resolution with good results, lower morbidity, and faster recovery than open techniques. Depending on the stricture's length and location, the reconstructive options are reimplantation, psoas hitch, Boari flap, ureteroureterostomy, appendiceal onlay flap, buccal mucosa graft (BMG) ureteroplasty, ileal replacement, or renal autotransplantation. The robotic approach offers a magnified vision and the possibility of adding near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging, indocyanine green (ICG), and FireflyTM to facilitate the technique. Multicenter studies with extended follow-up still have to confirm the good results obtained in published case series. Robotic reconstructive techniques are useful for repairing ureteral strictures, obtaining good functional results with less morbidity and faster recovery than open procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier Reinoso Elbers
- Instituto de Cirugía Urológica Avanzada (ICUA) - Clínica CEMTRO II, Ventisquero de la Condesa 48, 3ª Planta, 28034, Madrid, Spain
| | - Moises Rodríguez Socarrás
- Instituto de Cirugía Urológica Avanzada (ICUA) - Clínica CEMTRO II, Ventisquero de la Condesa 48, 3ª Planta, 28034, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Juan Gómez Rivas
- Instituto de Cirugía Urológica Avanzada (ICUA) - Clínica CEMTRO II, Ventisquero de la Condesa 48, 3ª Planta, 28034, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ana Maria Autran
- Oficina de Investigacion CAU (Confederacion Americana de Urologia), Madrid, Argentina
| | | | | | - Diego M Carrion
- Instituto de Cirugía Urológica Avanzada (ICUA) - Clínica CEMTRO II, Ventisquero de la Condesa 48, 3ª Planta, 28034, Madrid, Spain
| | - Fernando Gómez Sancha
- Instituto de Cirugía Urológica Avanzada (ICUA) - Clínica CEMTRO II, Ventisquero de la Condesa 48, 3ª Planta, 28034, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Seetharam Bhat KR, Moschovas MC, Patel VR, Ko YH. The robot-assisted ureteral reconstruction in adult: A narrative review on the surgical techniques and contemporary outcomes. Asian J Urol 2020; 8:38-49. [PMID: 33569271 PMCID: PMC7859418 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2020.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2019] [Revised: 03/30/2020] [Accepted: 07/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite the rapid increase in the use of robotic surgery in urology, the majority of ureteric reconstruction procedures are still performed using laparoscopic or open approaches. This is primarily due to uncertainty regarding the advantages of robotic approaches over conventional ones, and the unique difficulty in identifying the specific area of interest due to the lack of tactile feedback from the current robotic systems. However, with the potential benefits of minimal invasiveness, several pioneering reports have been published on robotic surgery in urology. By reviewing the literature on this topic, we aimed to summarize the techniques, considerations, and consistent findings regarding robotic ureteral reconstruction in adults. Robotic applications for ureteral surgery have been primarily reported for pediatric urology, especially in the context of relieving a congenital obstruction in the ureteral pelvic junction. However, contemporary studies have also consistently demonstrated that robotic surgery could be a reliable option for malignant, iatrogenic, and traumatic conditions, which generally occur in adult patients. Nevertheless, the lack of comparative studies on heterogeneous hosts and disease conditions make it difficult to determine the benefit of the robotic approach over the conventional approach in the general population; thus, qualified prospective trials are needed for wider acceptance. However, contemporary reports have demonstrated that the robotic approach could be an alternative option for ureteral construction, even in the absence of haptic feedback, which can be compensated by various surgical techniques and enhanced three-dimensional visualization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marcio Covas Moschovas
- Department of Urology, AdventHealth Global Robotics Institute, Celebration, FL, United States
| | - Vipul R Patel
- Department of Urology, AdventHealth Global Robotics Institute, Celebration, FL, United States
| | - Young Hwii Ko
- Department of Urology, Yeungnam University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Porpiglia F, Checcucci E, Piramide F, Amparore D, Fiori C, Hemal A. Subtotal ureteral substitution with ileum for patients with multiple ureteral stenosis. Transl Androl Urol 2020; 9:971-976. [PMID: 32420213 PMCID: PMC7215022 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2019.12.32] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The use of small bowel for ureteral substitution in patients with ureteral stenosis can, nowadays, be safely performed with a laparoscopic or robotic mini-invasive approach. To date, this technique required a complete substitution of the ureter with ileum. In this work we present our robotic intracorporeal sub-total ureteral substitution preserving the distal part of the ureter with the aim to reduce the risk of vescico-ureteral reflux. We report the case of a 65-years old male with a “functional” right single kidney and multiple recurrent stenosis. Our technique seems to be feasible and safe, no intra or postoperative complication were recorded. At 3 months of follow-up the trans-nephrostomic enhanced CT showed a completely opacification of ileal ureter, thus the nephrostomic tube was removed. At 6 and 12 months the patient was asymptomatic and with a level of serum creatinine 1.9 and 1.6 mg/dL, respectively. In conclusion the sub-total ureteral substitution with ileum can be a safety and effective procedure for patients who require a mandatory preservation of homolateral renal function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Porpiglia
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Enrico Checcucci
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Federico Piramide
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Daniele Amparore
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Cristian Fiori
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Ashok Hemal
- Department of Urology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|