Why switch from warfarin to NOACs?

Common P-glycoprotein (ABCB1) polymorphisms do not seem to be associated with the risk of rivaroxaban-related bleeding events: Preliminary data

Introduction

Considering conflicting previous reports, we aimed to evaluate whether the common ABCB1 polymorphisms (rs1128503, rs2032582, rs1045642, rs4148738) affected the risk of bleeding in rivaroxaban-treated patients.

Materials and methods

We report preliminary data from a larger nested case-control study. Consecutive adults started on rivaroxaban for any indication requiring > 6 months of treatment were followed-up to one year. Patients who experienced major or non-major clinically relevant bleeding during the initial 6 months were considered cases, whereas subjects free of bleeding over > 6 months were controls. The polymorphisms of interest (rs1128503, rs2032582, rs1045642, rs4148738) were in a strong linkage disequilibrium, hence patients were classified regarding the "load" of variant alleles: 0-2, 3-5 or 6-8. The three subsets were balanced regarding a range of demographic, comorbidity, comedication and genetic characteristics. A logistic model was fitted to probability of bleeding.

Results

There were 60 cases and 220 controls. Raw proportions of cases were similar across the subsets with increasing number of ABCB1 variant alleles (0-2, N = 85; 3-6, N = 133; 6-8, N = 62): 22.4%, 21.8%, and 19.4%, respectively. Fully adjusted probabilities of bleeding were also similar across the subsets: 22.9%, 27.5% and 17.7%, respectively. No trend was observed (linear, t = -0.63, df = 273, P = 0.529; quadratic, t = -1.10, df = 273, P = 0.272). Of the 15 identified haplotypes, the completely variant (c.1236T_c.2677T(A)_c.3435T_c.2482-2236A) (40.7%) and completely wild-type (C_G_C_G) (39.5%) haplotypes prevailed, and had a closely similar prevalence of cases: 21.1% vs. 23.1%, respectively.

Conclusions

The evaluated common ABCB1 polymorphisms do not seem to affect the risk of early bleeding in patients started on rivaroxaban.

Experiencing a virtual patient to practice patient counselling skills

INTRODUCTION

Virtual patients (VPs) are a safe and standardised method of simulating clinical environments but few studies have explored health care professional's experiences of learning via a VP. This study explored how users experienced and used a VP that aimed to teach the user to deliver non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant patient education.

METHODS

The study used semi-structured interviews with pharmacists and pre-registration trainees from a wider research study. Interview topics were based on key areas concerning VP use. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim before being analysed using the framework approach to thematic analysis. Ethical approval was granted by Keele University.

RESULTS

There was variation in the type and nature of use of the VP and in the reported learning, which included reinforcement of knowledge, an opportunity to promote reflection, and acquisition and application of knowledge to clinical, patient-facing interactions. The VP was seen as an adjunct to other education and training. The majority of users indicated that they used the VP more than once. Some users seemed to have gamified their learning with a drive to achieve perfect feedback rather than true engagement with the learning, whereas for others the learning appeared to be deep with a reflective focus.

CONCLUSIONS

The VP offered an educational use as experiential learning, although the users experienced the VP differently; commonly the VP facilitated learning via reinforcement of pre-existing knowledge. The users reported that the VP had value as an adjunct to other education and training resources.

Machine Learning for Prediction of Stable Warfarin Dose in US Latinos and Latin Americans

Populations used to create warfarin dose prediction algorithms largely lacked participants reporting Hispanic or Latino ethnicity. While previous research suggests nonlinear modeling improves warfarin dose prediction, this research has mainly focused on populations with primarily European ancestry. We compare the accuracy of stable warfarin dose prediction using linear and nonlinear machine learning models in a large cohort enriched for US Latinos and Latin Americans (ULLA). Each model was tested using the same variables as published by the International Warfarin Pharmacogenetics Consortium (IWPC) and using an expanded set of variables including ethnicity and warfarin indication. We utilized a multiple linear regression model and three nonlinear regression models: Bayesian Additive Regression Trees, Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines, and Support Vector Regression. We compared each model’s ability to predict stable warfarin dose within 20% of actual stable dose, confirming trained models in a 30% testing dataset with 100 rounds of resampling. In all patients (n = 7,030), inclusion of additional predictor variables led to a small but significant improvement in prediction of dose relative to the IWPC algorithm (47.8 versus 46.7% in IWPC, p = 1.43 × 10⁻¹⁵). Nonlinear models using IWPC variables did not significantly improve prediction of dose over the linear IWPC algorithm. In ULLA patients alone (n = 1,734), IWPC performed similarly to all other linear and nonlinear pharmacogenetic algorithms. Our results reinforce the validity of IWPC in a large, ethnically diverse population and suggest that additional variables that capture warfarin dose variability may improve warfarin dose prediction algorithms.

Comparison of potential pharmacokinetic drug interactions in patients with atrial fibrillation and changing from warfarin to non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant therapy

There are now anticoagulant choices with proposed advantages of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) over warfarin being less routine monitoring and less drug interactions. Interacting medication can impact the efficacy and safety of anticoagulant therapy with management remaining clinically challenging. There have been limited studies comparing the potential for pharmacokinetic (PK) drug interactions between different anticoagulants. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare potential PK interactions in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) changing from warfarin to NOAC therapy. A retrospective analysis was conducted of patients with AF enrolled in a dedicated warfarin program but exiting this program to commence a NOAC. Patient data was collected, and concurrent medications were utilised to identify potential PK drug interactions with both warfarin and the chosen NOAC therapy. Patients were grouped according to the number of medications with potential PK interactions and comparisons made between groups. Of the 712 eligible patients who ceased warfarin to commence a NOAC, most commenced either apixaban (45.9%) or rivaroxaban (41.9%). When comparing warfarin to NOACs, there were significant differences in the proportion of patients taking no medication with potential PK drug interactions (46.9% vs 62.8%, p < 0.0001), and taking one (35.2% vs 28.5%, p = 0.0067) and two (14.5% vs 7.3%, p < 0.0001) potentially PK interacting medications. This study found when patients with AF were switched from warfarin to a NOAC, the potential for PK drug interactions significantly reduced but remained around 40%. Identifying and managing potential PK drug interactions with NOACs remains a priority to optimise clinical benefit of these anticoagulants.

Optimal Use of the Non-Inferiority Trial Design

Superiority trials are conducted to test the hypothesis that a treatment or strategy A is superior to (i.e., better than) treatment strategy B in reducing the impact of disease. However, A may be considerably safer, more convenient, or cheaper than B. These features may make A more attractive than B even if the burden of disease is reduced comparably by the two treatments, or even a bit worse by A over B. In this context, non-inferiority trials have become increasingly popular to test the hypothesis that a new treatment is not 'unacceptably worse' than an active comparator by more than a predefined non-inferiority margin. Non-inferiority trials have unique design features and methodology and require a different analysis than traditional superiority trials. The main aim of this overview is to analyze the role of non-inferiority trials in the development of new treatments, involving some scientific, statistical, and practical considerations. We elucidate some aspects of non-inferiority trials that contribute to the validity of the results. The unique design features and methodology of non-inferiority trials are summarized and key findings to consider when evaluating a non-inferiority trial are illustrated.

Anticoagulant drug utilization pattern and their cost analysis: a retrospective study from Saudi Arabia

Objective

The study was aimed to evaluate the cost and drug utilization pattern of anticoagulant drugs in a clinical setting in Saudi Arabia.

Method

A cross-sectional retrospective study was conducted in a private hospital in Saudi Arabia. World Health Organization, defined daily dose, and American Society of Hematology methods were used to compute the daily price of each anticoagulant agent.

Key findings

Consumption of oral anticoagulants was very less as compared to the parenteral. Apixaban was the most prescribed oral drug, while enoxaparin sodium was the drug of choice among the parenteral. In oral anticoagulants, the unit-wise cost was found to be highest for Rivaroxaban (12.60 SR (3.36 USD) and less for Warfarin (0.82 SR (0.22 USD)). Heparin sodium cost (51.62 SR (13.76 USD) was found to be the most expensive parenteral agent while the least expensive was Phytomenadione (3.76 SR (1.00 USD)).

Conclusion

Apixaban was the preferred oral anticoagulant among all the studied anticoagulants, although Warfarin is the cheapest. Therapeutic drug monitoring was recommended for Warfarin. The study highlights the importance of more studies to measure the advantages and disadvantages of all types of anticoagulants.

Use of Oral Anticoagulation and Diabetes Do Not Inhibit the Angiogenic Potential of Hypoxia Preconditioned Blood-Derived Secretomes

Patients suffering from tissue ischemia, who would greatly benefit from angiogenesis-promoting therapies such as hypoxia preconditioned blood-derived secretomes commonly receive oral anticoagulation (OA) and/or have diabetes mellitus (DM). In this study, we investigated the effect of OA administration on the in vitro angiogenic potential of hypoxia preconditioned plasma (HPP) and serum (HPS), prepared from nondiabetic/diabetic subjects who did not receive OA (n = 5) or were treated with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA, n = 8), ASA + clopidogrel (n = 10), or nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (n = 7) for longer than six months. The effect of DM was differentially assessed by comparing HPP/HPS obtained from nondiabetic (n = 8) and diabetic (n = 16) subjects who had not received OA in the past six months. The concentration of key proangiogenic (vascular endothelial growth factor or VEGF) and antiangiogenic (thrombospondin-1 or TSP-1 and platelet factor-4 or PF-4) protein factors in HPP/HPS was analyzed via ELISA, while their ability to induce microvessel formations was examined in endothelial cell cultures. We found that OA use significantly reduced VEGF levels in HPP, but not HPS, compared to non-OA controls. While HPP and HPS TSP-1 levels remained largely unchanged as a result of OA usage, HPS PF-4 levels were significantly reduced in samples obtained from OA-treated subjects. Neither OA administration nor DM appeared to significantly reduce the ability of HPP or HPS to induce microvessel formations in vitro. These findings indicate that OA administration does not limit the angiogenic potential of hypoxia preconditioned blood-derived secretomes, and therefore, it does not prohibit the application of these therapies for supporting tissue vascularization and wound healing in healthy or diabetic subjects.

Non-inferiority Trial Design in Drug Development: A Primer for Cardiovascular Healthcare Professionals

Noninferiority trials, in which a new treatment is compared with a standard active treatment, are becoming increasingly popular in cardiovascular medicine. A noninferiority trial seeks to test whether the effect of a new drug is not unacceptably worse than that of an active comparator by more than a predefined noninferiority margin. Noninferiority trials are typically used when a new drug is anticipated to have an efficacy profile similar to its comparator and offers advantages over the existing drug (better toxicity profile, less expensive, less invasive, simpler regimen, shorter treatment duration, different resistance profile). Given the high number of noninferiority trials, it is vital that clinicians fully understand the clinical impacts of the results. Nonetheless, assessing noninferiority in a trial is complex, in both the design and the analysis phases. The crucial issue in the design of a noninferiority trial is the definition of the noninferiority margin, accounting for both statistical (summarizing the historical evidence of the active comparator from randomized controlled trials) and clinical (choosing the fraction of the effect of the old drug that should be "preserved" by the new drug) considerations. We review the role of noninferiority trials in the development of new cardiovascular treatments and discuss a variety of key issues involved in the design and conduction of noninferiority trials, using some examples from real clinical trials in cardiovascular medicine.

Patient Adherence to Novel Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs) for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation and Occurrence of Associated Bleeding Events: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Real-world evidence from published observational studies of adherence to Novel Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs) medications and associated clinical outcome events in Atrial Fibrillation (AF) patients, was reviewed systematically.

METHODS

Observational studies assessing patient adherence to NOACs conducted on AF patients between September 2010 and June 2016 were identified by systematic searching keywords to locate eligible studies, in accordance with Cochrane guidelines. PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar databases were searched to identify the studies. Meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model with DerSimonian-Laird weighting to obtain pooled effect sizes.

RESULTS

From 185 potentially relevant citations, 6 studies, comprising 1.6 million AF patients, were included. Among these, successful adherence to NOACs occurred in 75.6%. Adherence levels were higher in patients treated with dabigatran (72.7%) compared with those treated with apixaban (59.9%) or rivaroxaban (59.3%). However, adherence was still suboptimal (relative to an expected 80% adherence rate). Bleeding events in non-adherent patients were found to be 7.5%.

CONCLUSION

Suboptimal adherence to NOACs among AF patients was highlighted as a significant risk factor that may affect clinical outcomes, with a higher percentage of non-adherent patients having bleeding events. There is an urgent need for research on the effects of specific interventions to improve patient adherence to NOACs and to assess the related outcome factors that may be associated with adherence.

Changing trends in the use of novel oral anticoagulants and warfarin for treating non-valvular atrial fibrillation

Background

Prevention of thromboembolism by novel oral anticoagulants is increasing, whilst use of vitamin K antagonists is on the decline. We assessed changes in the use of these anticoagulants in treating non-valvular atrial fibrillation between 2014 and 2018.

Methods

One-hundred and sixty-two consecutive patients (95 men, 67 women) with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, mean age 72.3 years (standard deviation = 11.0), underwent cardiac assessment in a single cardiac unit. Use of anticoagulants at the time of investigation was documented: overall 83 (51.2%) patients were prescribed novel oral anticoagulants and 79 (48.8%) warfarin treatment. Trends in treatment rates with either anticoagulant class over time were characterised by calculating the average annual percentage change using a Joinpoint Regression Program 4.7.0.0.

Results

There were diverging trends in anticoagulant treatment from 2014 to 2018 without join points: yearly increase in novel oral anticoagulant treatment (41.9, 45.5, 53.7, 53.1 and 72.7%, average annual percentage change = 16.2%, 95% confidence interval = 5.8% to 27.5%, p < 0.001), and decrease in warfarin treatment (57.1, 54.5, 46.3, 46.9 and 27.3%, average annual percentage change = −14.4%, 95% confidence interval = −25.2% to −2.1%, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Changing trends in treatment with anticoagulants for patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation observed within less than two years provide important information to healthcare services to estimate future pharmaco-economic costs for such treatments.

Trends of ambulatory oral anticoagulant prescription in five major cities of China, 2012-2017

Background

The introduction of non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs) has changed the landscape of preventing thromboembolism events in many countries. However, the prescription trends of oral anticoagulant (OAC) in China are still unclear, which were evaluated in this study through data extracted and summarized from 5 major cities as representatives.

Methods

This study was designed as a time-series study which was based on pharmacy prescription data. Analysis was performed on yearly aggregated visits and expenditure. The results were also stratified by indications and specialties.

Results

A total of 189,006 prescriptions of 67 hospitals in 6 years were included in the study. The average growth rates of overall visit and expenditure of OAC were 15.8 and 57.5%, respectively. The share of warfarin decreased and NOACs had taken 92% of cost, covering 28% of patients in 2017. The more frequently used NOACs were rivaroxaban and dabigatran. The use of OAC was differed by indication and specialty.

Conclusion

The use of NOACs was found increasing rapidly in both visits and cost, sharing a majority of cost with a minority of patients. Attentions should be paid on the rational use of NOACs.

Risk of major bleeding among users of direct oral anticoagulants combined with interacting drugs: A population-based nested case-control study

Aims

To assess the association between concurrent use of potential pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interacting drugs and major bleeding among direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) users.

Methods

We performed a case–control study nested in a cohort of new users of DOACs (dabigatran etexilate, apixaban or rivaroxaban). Data were obtained from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink linked to Hospital Episode Statistics (2008–2015). Cases were patients hospitalized having a primary diagnosis of major bleeding. Up to 4 controls were matched on age, sex, index date and region. Odds ratios (ORs) for the risk of major bleeding were assessed by conditional logistic regression analysis and adjusted for well‐known covariates for the risk of bleeding.

Results

We identified 393 patients with a major bleeding from a total of 23 492 new users of DOACs and 1494 matched controls. Most subjects were users of rivaroxaban (58.8%) on the index date. The concurrent use of pharmacodynamic interacting drugs was associated with an increased risk of major bleeding (21.6% of cases vs 13.5% of controls, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.40–2.66). For the antiplatelet drugs the aOR was 2.01 (95% CI, 1.29–3.11) and for the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors the aOR was 1.68 (95% CI, 1.10–2.59). We found no increased risk of major bleeding for concurrent use of pharmacokinetic interacting drugs vs DOACs alone (45.0 vs 51.2%; aOR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.53–1.10).

Conclusion

Among patients taking DOACs the concurrent use of antiplatelet drugs or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors was associated with increased risk of major bleeding, while pharmacokinetic interacting drugs do not increase this risk.

Validation of an algorithm to predict decline in INR following warfarin cessation in patients undergoing invasive procedures

Patients on warfarin are required to withdraw from treatment for a fixed period (normally 5 days) prior to an invasive procedure. However, the anticoagulant effect of warfarin subsides at different rates among different patients, exposing some to increased risk of either thrombosis or bleeding. In a recent study in patients awaiting surgery, following warfarin cessation the INR declined slower over time in those with two CYP2C9 variant alleles, increasing age, weight and number of comorbidities and that INR decline was faster in those with higher maintenance INR value. Subsequently, we developed an algorithm which predicts INR decline in individual patients after 5 days of warfarin cessation. The current study validated the algorithm. An independent cohort of patients completing a short course of warfarin took part in the study. INR values for subsequent 9 days and CYP2C9 genotype were available. The predicted INR decline (INR_{day 1}–INR_{day 5}) was compared to the observed one (where an INR check on day 5 was unavailable, INR was estimated using a linear approximation model). There was a strong correlation between the decline in INR by day 5 and that predicted from the algorithm for the 117 patients (r = 0.949, p < 0.001). The algorithm was precise, with low degree of bias and variance of the prediction error. The algorithm can accurately predict the INR decline following warfarin cessation in individual adult patients. The use of this easily adoptable algorithm can reduce cancellation or delays of planned surgical procedures.

Clinical Characteristics And Health Care Resources In Patients Treated With Oral Anticoagulants: Evidences From Italian Administrative Databases

Objectives

1) To evaluate anticoagulation treatment patterns and health care resource use in adult patients with a discharge diagnosis of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in an Italian real-world setting and 2) to describe the characteristics of NVAF patients in relation to treatment.

Design

A retrospective cohort study in a "real-world" setting.

Setting

Data were analysed by integrating administrative databases that included approximately 2,000,000 individuals assisted by the National Health System from two Italian Local Health Units.

Participants

All adult patients with at least one hospital discharge or ≥2 outpatient visits with a diagnosis code for NVAF from 1/01/2011 to 31/12/2015 were included.

Main outcome measures

Anticoagulation treatment patterns, health care resource use and major bleeding events that occurred during the follow-up period were evaluated.

Results

32,863 NVAF patients were included, of whom 7,831 had at least one prescription of oral anticoagulants. Among them, 6,876 patients were vitamin K antagonists (VKA) users and 955 were non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) users at index date (ID). During the follow-up period, the use of antiplatelet drugs was higher among VKA-naïve users than the NOAC-naïve users. Among NOAC users, 76.1% showed an adherence level ≥80% during follow-up. The rate of bleeding events resulted higher for VKA patients compared to NOAC patients. The unadjusted incidence rate was 10.46 per 1000 person-year for VKA patients and 4.55 per 1,000 person-years for NOAC patients. The overall annual cost (in term of drugs, hospitalisations and outpatient specialist services) was € 5,156.13 for VKA and € 4,630.57 for NOAC.

Conclusion

This unselected cohort study, on NVAF patients being prescribed oral anticoagulants, highlights that VKA was largely prescribed and the great majority of patients on NOACs were adherent to treatment. Most of the OAC patients still received antiplatelet agents in combination, and in NOAC patients, we registered a lower number of bleeding events compared with VKA.

Rivaroxaban concentrations in acute stroke patients with different dosage forms

BACKGROUND

The crushed-tablet rivaroxaban concentration has been previously reported to be lower than the non-crushed concentration. However, the rivaroxaban concentration of fine granules has not yet been investigated. The anticoagulation intensity of rivaroxaban with fine granules, tablets, and crushed tablets was compared in acute stroke patients to assess the efficacy of each form.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

Hospitalized patients over 75 years old with acute stroke who started taking rivaroxaban from April 2012 to September 2017 were included. Blood samples were drawn just before and 4 hours after taking rivaroxaban on a median of 5 days after treatment initiation for concentration measurements (C0h, C4h) based on an anti-factor Xa chromogenic assay. Of 114 patients (49 female, 83±5 years old), 97 had ischemic strokes, 9 had transient ischemic attacks, and 8 had intracerebral hemorrhages. Rivaroxaban was administered a median of 7 days after onset. Of these, 38 patients were given the 15 mg dose, and 76 were given the 10 mg dose. In the 15 mg dose group, C0h was significantly higher in the fine granule group than in the crushed tablet group, with no significant difference compared to the tablet group [C0h: 27.6±6.8 vs 4.0±4.1 (P = 0.01) vs. 33.3±25.2 ng/ml, (P = 0.51), respectively], as was C4h [223.0±66.6 vs 103.0±79.5 (P = 0.02) vs. 229.5±121.6 ng/ml (P = 0.88)]. In the 10 mg dose group, C0h was significantly higher in the fine granule group than in the crushed tablet group and comparable to that in the tablet group [23.2±7.9 vs 7.5±6.2 (P<0.01) vs 19.0±15.8 ng/ml, (P = 0.35)], as was C4h [150.7±85.4 vs 85.1±46.8 (P<0.01) vs 189.8±92.7 ng/ml (P = 0.18)].

CONCLUSIONS

The rivaroxaban concentration with fine granules was consistent with that in the tablet group and higher than that in the crushed tablet group.

Antithrombotic therapy and intracranial bleeding in subjects with sporadic brain arteriovenous malformations: preliminary results from a retrospective study

Whether antithrombotic treatment is safe and/or affects the risk of intracranial bleeding in subjects with sporadic brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) is unknown. We conducted a retrospective analysis on the use of antithrombotics among patients affected by brain AVMs in follow-up at our institution. Attention was paid to the type of antithrombotic drug (either antiplatelets or anticoagulants), current or past use, dosage, and duration of treatment. Several clinical and angioarchitectural features of brain AVMs were also taken into consideration. The association between the use of antithrombotics and haemorrhagic onset was analyzed. A total of 77 patients were included in this study. Among them, ten patients were taking antithrombotic drugs at the time of AVM diagnosis. The rate of haemorrhagic onset was not significantly different between subjects who were and were not taking antithrombotic drugs (40 vs 55.2%, p = ns). Among the many clinical and angioarchitectural features analyzed, the only parameter that showed a statistically significant association with haemorrhagic onset was the size of the nidus. Patients who took antithrombotic treatments after being diagnosed with a brain AVM did not show an increased rate of intracranial haemorrhage over time considering a mean follow-up 4 years. In our study, antithrombotic treatment was not associated with increased intracranial bleeding among subjects with brain AVMs. In the presence of a strong clinical indication, antiplatelet and anticoagulant medications should not be denied a priori to patients with brain AVMs. Studies on larger populations are necessary to confirm these data.

NOAC in "real world" patients with atrial fibrillation in Italy: results from the ISPAF-2 (Indagine Sicoa Paziente Con Fibrillazione Atriale) survey study

In the past few years, new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) targeting directly a single activated clotting factor, have been developed for the treatment of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF), which are currently recommended as first-line therapy in AF. The aim of this study is to provide an overall picture on the extent to which oral anticoagulation (OAC) with NOACs correspond to actually prescribed OAC therapy in an unselected, real world, population of consecutive patients with AF in Italy. Compliance with the therapy and quality of life were also assessed. A 50 cardiology unit network located in different geographic areas of Italy enrolled a total of 1742 consecutive outpatients with AF (54.6% males, 45.4% females, mean age 72.5 years). NOACs were prescribed in 56.1% patients and VKA in 43.9% (P < 0.0001). NOACs were significantly more prescribed than VKA in patients with high thrombo-embolic risk score (i.e., CHA₂DS₂-VASc > 2) (78.2 vs 67.3%, P < 0.0001), but also patients at low risk (i.e., CHA₂DS₂-VASc < 1 and HAS-BLED < 3) were still under OAC therapy with either NOACs (27%) or VKA (73%). Adherence to therapy (Morisky test) was greater in patients taking NOACs as was the quality of life. The ISPAF-2 study shows that in an Italian population of real-world patients with AF the prescription of OAC according to current guidelines and stroke-risk scoring system is rather high although it still needs to be improved. Contrary to recommendations, in a high proportion of low-risk patients, anticoagulation therapy, with either NOACs and VKA is still prescribed, and this exposes patients to unjustified risks.

Risk profiles and one-year outcomes of patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation in India: Insights from the GARFIELD-AF Registry

Background

The Global Anticoagulant Registry in the FIELD–Atrial Fibrillation (GARFIELD-AF) is an ongoing prospective noninterventional registry, which is providing important information on the baseline characteristics, treatment patterns, and 1-year outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). This report describes data from Indian patients recruited in this registry.

Methods and results

A total of 52,014 patients with newly diagnosed AF were enrolled globally; of these, 1388 patients were recruited from 26 sites within India (2012–2016). In India, the mean age was 65.8 years at diagnosis of NVAF. Hypertension was the most prevalent risk factor for AF, present in 68.5% of patients from India and in 76.3% of patients globally (P < 0.001). Diabetes and coronary artery disease (CAD) were prevalent in 36.2% and 28.1% of patients as compared with global prevalence of 22.2% and 21.6%, respectively (P < 0.001 for both). Antiplatelet therapy was the most common antithrombotic treatment in India. With increasing stroke risk, however, patients were more likely to receive oral anticoagulant therapy [mainly vitamin K antagonist (VKA)], but average international normalized ratio (INR) was lower among Indian patients [median INR value 1.6 (interquartile range {IQR}: 1.3–2.3) versus 2.3 (IQR 1.8–2.8) (P < 0.001)]. Compared with other countries, patients from India had markedly higher rates of all-cause mortality [7.68 per 100 person-years (95% confidence interval 6.32–9.35) vs 4.34 (4.16–4.53), P < 0.0001], while rates of stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding were lower after 1 year of follow-up.

Conclusion

Compared to previously published registries from India, the GARFIELD-AF registry describes clinical profiles and outcomes in Indian patients with AF of a different etiology. The registry data show that compared to the rest of the world, Indian AF patients are younger in age and have more diabetes and CAD. Patients with a higher stroke risk are more likely to receive anticoagulation therapy with VKA but are underdosed compared with the global average in the GARFIELD-AF.

Clinical trial registration—URL

http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01090362.

Comparative effectiveness of rivaroxaban in the treatment of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation

Rivaroxaban is a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) approved for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, a common arrhythmia. In this review, we summarize the effectiveness of rivaroxaban versus warfarin and the DOACs dabigatran, apixaban and edoxaban. The primary focus is on primary evidence from clinical trials, indirect comparison studies and real-world studies. While there are gaps in the literature, the evidence thus far indicates that rivaroxaban is superior to warfarin and similar to dabigatran, apixaban and edoxaban for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, although rivaroxaban may be associated with an elevated bleeding risk compared with other DOACs.

Antithrombotic treatment in anticoagulated atrial fibrillation patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Coronary artery disease coexists in a clinically relevant number of patients with atrial fibrillation and it often requires percutaneous coronary intervention. These patients represent a particular challenge for clinicians in terms of antithrombotic management. They require combined antiplatelet-anticoagulant therapy to reduce the risk of recurrent ischemic cardiac events and stroke; however, this antithrombotic strategy is associated with an increased risk of bleeding complications. In the absence of randomized, controlled clinical trials, the majority of current recommendations rely on the results of cohort studies, meta-analyses, post-hoc analyses and subgroup analyses of large, phase III studies. Based on the available evidence, the present review discusses the optimal antithrombotic strategy for patients receiving chronic anticoagulant therapy due to atrial fibrillation who require antiplatelet treatment after acute coronary syndrome and/or percutaneous coronary intervention, and discusses the issue of dental procedures. The correct planning of therapy significantly reduces the risk of bleeding complications and thromboembolic events.

KEY MESSAGES

In order to reduce the occurrence of recurrent cardiac ischemic events and stroke, anticoagulated patients with acute coronary syndrome and/or percutaneous coronary intervention require a combination of therapies including anticoagulants and antiplatelet drugs. Using the newest optimal combination of therapeutic strategies reduces the risk of haemorrhagic complications.

Dawn of the direct-acting oral anticoagulants: trends in oral anticoagulant prescribing in Wales 2009-2015

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Oral anticoagulants (OACs) have been used for decades for the long-term prevention of arterial and venous thromboembolic disease. These include warfarin and the newer direct-acting OACs (DOACs). Data on 'real-life' prescribing patterns for DOACs are limited. In this commentary, we report the prescribing patterns for OACs in Wales, as a representative country within the UK.

COMMENT

A retrospective analysis of anonymized OAC prescribing data in Wales from June 2009 to December 2015. Results reveal that the number of OAC prescription items increased from 40·48 to 65·26 per 1000 prescribing unit (PU). Average cost increased from £87·41 to £529·31 per 1000 PU. The share of warfarin prescribing declined from 100% to 68%, with the a rising share for the DOACs, made up of rivaroxaban (19%), apixaban (9%) and dabigatran (3%) WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Analysis of real-life data demonstrates that there has been an increase in the overall numbers and costs of OAC prescriptions, with a rising proportion of DOACs to warfarin prescribing.