Incidence and factors associated with out-of-hospital peri-intubation cardiac arrest: a secondary analysis of the CURASMUR trial

[The correct way to deal with the definitive surgical airway]

Dealing with a difficult airway is familiar to emergency care providers in both the prehospital and clinical settings. In anesthesiology and emergency medical care different algorithms almost equal in their wording have been introduced, indicating that an emergency front of neck airway access (eFONA) has to be established in the case of a cannot ventilate-cannot oxygenate situation. In a survey (Surveymonkey®) data concerning the level of experience with eFONA, devices required, previous training and complications were allocated among acute and emergency care providers of different backgrounds (doctors and paramedics). Furthermore, we asked about individual attitudes to and frequency of previous situations, in which an eFONA was not established despite strong indications. Of the respondents 15% (n = 63) answered that they had experienced this type of situation. eFONA had been performed by 28% of the interviewed (n = 117), reflecting the high number of military and EMT (emergency medical team) physicians participating in the survey. The number of experiences are rarely representative for the civilian setting. Different adjuncts may be helpful to detect the cricothyroid ligament. To use ultrasound seems obvious but it doubles the time for the detection of the cricothyroid ligament. Laryngeal masks can be employed as a supraglottic airway device (SAD) during "plan B". Stabilizing the airway with a SAD almost doubles the success of identifying laryngeal landmarks in females. The crew resource management (CRM) guidelines are more than essential in threatening situations demanding measures like eFONA. Providers should anticipate emerging problems and whenever feasible call for help and finally speak up. Naming a failed airway should be avoided as it implies a failure of the provider or of the entire airway team. In fact, the term non-accessible airway should be introduced. This might help to avoid the implication of a major failure. So far, an ideal simulator to train eFONA has not been introduced but it is mandatory to train procedures and algorithms on different types of simulators and manikins to achieve mastery.

[Cricothyrotomy : Data situation, guidelines and techniques for the definitive surgical airway]

Cricothyrotomy represents the final approach to secure the airway, in the course of which less invasive measures have failed. It can also primarily be carried out to establish a secure airway. This is essential to protect the patient from a significant hypoxia. This is a cannot ventilate-cannot oxygenate (CVCO) situation, which presumably all colleagues in emergency intensive care medicine and anesthesia have already been confronted with. Evidence-based algorithms for the management of a difficult airway and CVCO have been established. If oxygenation using an endotracheal tube, an extraglottic airway device or bag-valve mask ventilation all fail, the airway must be surgically secured, i.e. using cricothyrotomy. The prevalence of the CVCO situation in a prehospital setting is ca. 1%. No valid prospective randomized in vivo studies have been carried with respect to the question of the best method.

Transport of the patient with trauma: a narrative review

Trauma and injury place a significant burden on healthcare systems. In most high-income countries, well-developed acute pre-hospital and trauma care systems have been established. In Europe, mobile physician-staffed medical teams are available for the most severely injured patients and apply a wide variety of lifesaving interventions at the same time as ensuring patient comfort. In trauma systems providing pre-hospital care, medical interventions are performed earlier in the patient journey and do not affect time to definite care. The mode of transport from the accident scene depends on the organisation of the healthcare system and the level of hospital care to which the patient is transported. This varies from 'scoop and run' to a basic community care setting, to advanced helicopter emergency medical service transport to a level 4 trauma centre. Secondary transport of trauma patients to a higher level of care should be avoided and may lead to a delay in definitive care. Critically injured patients must be accompanied by at least two healthcare professionals, one of whom must be skilled in cardiopulmonary resuscitation and advanced airway management techniques. Ideally, the standard of care provided during transport, including the level of monitoring, should mirror hospital care. Pre-hospital care focuses on the critical care patient, but the majority of injured patients need only close observation and pain management during transport. Providing comfort and preventing additional injury is the responsibility of the whole transport team.