Phenobarbital use in benzodiazepine and z-drug detoxification: a single-centre 15-year observational retrospective study in clinical practice

Real-world analysis on the use of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid for alcohol withdrawal syndrome in hospitalized patients with diagnosis of cirrhosis

The present real-world analysis aimed to evaluate and describe the use of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB) for alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS) in hospitalized patients with diagnosis of liver cirrhosis. An 11-year observational retrospective study on patients affected by liver cirrhosis and alcohol use disorder (AUD) was performed using data from the Medical Toxicology Unit of Careggi University Hospital in Florence (Italy). A multivariate logistic regression was performed to estimate the probability of having a CIWA-Ar Max 3-4 during hospitalization, an AWS length  > 36 h, a hospitalization > 9 days, and the probability of developing drowsiness. A total of 166 AUD patients were included, of these 77 received GHB (70.13% within the first day of hospitalization) and 89 were treated without GHB. The majority were  ≥ 40 years of age (87.35%) and males (80.12%). GHB patients were more likely to have a CIWA-Ar Max 3-4 during hospitalization (OR 3.76 [CI 95% 1.02-13.85]), and a longer hospitalization (OR 3.08 [95% CI 1.23-7.71]). Early GHB administration decreased the probability of CIWA-Ar Max worsening (OR 0.06 [95% CI 0.01-0.49]). GHB dose  ≥ 100 mg/kg was not associated with the occurrence of drowsiness. Patients exposed to other sedative agents were more likely to experience drowsiness (OR 7.22 [95% CI 1.46-35.61]). The present real-world analysis underlines that GHB could be a valuable and safe option for the management of AWS in AUD patients affected by liver cirrhosis, also when administered early and even at higher than recommended dosages.

Association Between Hypnotics and Dementia: A Mini Narrative Review

OBJECTIVE

This narrative review aims to provide a comprehensive assessment of the existing literature on the relationship between hypnotics and dementia, considering both potential link and inconclusive or lack of association.

METHODS

Data from studies that investigate the association between hypnotic medications and dementia were reviewed. Studies included both cohort studies and systematic reviews, participants with various type of dementia and hypnotics including benzodiazepines (BZDs) and Z-drugs (ZDs).

RESULTS

The existing literatures presents conflicting evidence regarding the association between hypnotics, including BZDs and ZDs, and the risk of dementia. Some studies suggest a potential link between prolonged use of hypnotics and an increased risk of dementia. However, other studies indicate inconclusive or lacking evidence regarding this association. Factors such as study design, sample characteristics, and control of confounding variables contribute to the variability in findings.

CONCLUSION

The relationship between hypnotics and dementia remains complex and controversial. While some studies suggest a potential association, others find inconclusive or conflicting evidence. Future research should focus on addressing methodological limitations, considering classifying dementia subtypes, and try to adjust medication lag time.

Chronic use of benzodiazepines: The problem that persists

Though clinical guidelines and policies discourage the chronic prescribing of benzodiazepines, rates of prescribing have continued to rise in the United States to the tune of an estimated 65.9 million office visits per year. Quietly, we have become a nation on benzodiazepines. There are numerous reasons for this discrepancy between official recommendations on the one hand, and actual clinical practice on the other. Drawing from the literature, we argue that while patients and providers both shoulder some of the responsibility, they also cannot be solely blamed. Rather, policies and guidelines regarding benzodiazepines have become out of touch with the clinical reality that benzodiazepines are now deeply entrenched in modern medicine. We propose that guidelines regarding benzodiazepines need to reconsider how to apply concepts such as harm reduction and other lessons learned in the opioid epidemic in order to help physicians manage this oft-deferred, but increasingly pressing problem affecting millions of Americans.

Exposures and Suspected Intoxications to Pharmacological and Non-Pharmacological Agents in Children Aged 0-14 Years: Real-World Data from an Italian Reference Poison Control Centre

This study describes the exposures and suspected intoxications in children (0-14 years) managed by an Italian reference poison control center (PCC). A seven-year observational retrospective study was performed on the medical records of the Toxicology Unit and PCC, Careggi University Hospital, Florence (Italy). During the study period (2015-2021), a total of 27,212 phone call consultations were managed by the PCC, of which 11,996 (44%) involved subjects aged 0-14 years. Most cases occurred in males (54%) aged 1-5 years (73.8%), mainly at home (97.4%), and with an oral route of intoxication (93%). Cases mainly occurred involuntarily. Consultations were generally requested by caregivers; however, in the age group 12-14 years, 70% were requested by healthcare professionals due to voluntary intoxications. Cleaners (19.44%) and household products (10.90%) were the most represented suspected agents. Pharmacological agents accounted for 28.80% of exposures. Covariates associated with a higher risk of emergency department visit or hospitalization were voluntary intoxication (OR 29.18 [11.76-72.38]), inhalation route (OR 1.87 [1.09-3.23]), and pharmacological agents (OR 1.34 [1.23-1.46]), particularly central nervous system medications. Overall, consultations do not burden national and regional healthcare facilities, revealing the activity of PCCs as having a strategic role in reducing public health spending, even during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Hospitalisations related to benzodiazepine, Z-drug, and opioid treatment in Italy: a claim on the risks associated with inappropriate use

Purpose

Benzodiazepines (BZD), Z-drugs (ZD), and opioids share a high risk of abuse. This study assessed and characterised adverse events (AEs) related to BDZ, ZD, and opioids leading to emergency department (ED) visits in the Italian setting.

Methods

ED accesses related to BDZ, ZD, and/or opioids were analysed from the MEREAFaPS database. Information on AEs, suspected and concomitant medications was retrieved. Multivariate logistic regression was used to estimate the reporting odds ratios (RORs) of hospitalisation according to the different treatments.

Results

A total of 5,970 pharmacovigilance reports involving BZD/ZD (n = 3,106), opioids (n = 2,767), or their combination (n = 97) were analysed. Compared to opioids, patients with BZD/ZD-related AEs were often younger (51 vs 64 years), more frequently presented 2+ suspected medications (13 vs 3%), and often had a history of abuse (4%). Twenty-three percent of BZD/ZD-related AEs were related to drug abuse (vs 2% of opioid-related ones) and frequently required patient hospitalisation (52% vs 24%), despite the significantly lower clinical complexity of these patients as compared to those on opioids. An increased risk of hospitalisation was found for flurazepam (ROR 1.62; 95% CI, 1.18–2.22), prazepam (2.66; 1.05–6.70), lorazepam (1.26; 1.07–1.49), and morphine (1.76; 1.11–2.79).

Conclusions

These results indicate that, in Italy, the inappropriate use of BZD/ZD is a relevant heath issue, often leading to serious AEs requiring patients’ ED visits and hospitalisation, especially in young women and patients with a history of substance abuse.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00228-022-03354-7.