One-stage bilateral pulmonary resections for pulmonary metastases

The Simultaneous Bilateral Surgical Procedure for Bilateral Primary Lung Cancer

Objective: At present, the incidence of synchronous multiple primary lung cancer (SMPLC) is increasing, and the treatment is still a challenge. This study aims to investigate the appropriate surgical procedure for treating bilateral primary lung cancer simultaneously. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data from 32 patients who underwent simultaneous bilateral lung cancer surgery in our team. This data included patient characteristics, pulmonary function indicators, surgical procedures, operation duration, chest tube removal time, postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative complications. Results: Out of the 32 patients, 15 were male, and 17 were female, with an average age of 56.4 ± 8.8 years. The average maximum diameter of the main and minor tumors was 1.8 ± 1.0 cm and 1.0 ± .5 cm, respectively. All surgeries were performed thoracoscopically through intercostal approach. The procedure for the minor tumor was performed first, followed by the main tumor operation after turning over. One case was converted to thoracotomy during the main tumor operation because of bleeding. Postoperative complications occurred in one patient. No instances of respiratory insufficiency or failure were observed after the operation, and there were no perioperative deaths or readmissions within 90 days. Conclusion: Simultaneous bilateral thoracoscopic surgery is deemed a secure and feasible option for eligible patients with bilateral primary lung cancer, and it is advisable to commence the operation on the minor tumor first.

Experience of Simultaneous Bilateral Open Surgery and VATS for Pulmonary Metastasectomy

BACKGROUND

Resection is the current treatment of choice for resectable bilateral pulmonary metastases. This study aimed to compare the differences in outcomes between simultaneous bilateral open and video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) for pulmonary metastasectomy.

METHODS

Forty-three patients underwent pulmonary metastasectomy through one-stage bilateral open thoracotomy (n = 16) and VATS (n = 27) between 2011 and 2020. Perioperative and oncological data were analyzed.

RESULTS

The predominant primary tumor histology in both groups was colorectal cancer. The operative time, blood loss, and pain score on postoperative day 1 (POD1) were higher in the open group (p < 0.001, 0.009, and 0.03, respectively). No significant differences in pain score on POD2 and POD3, postoperative length of stay, or complications were found. Notably, numbers of the resected metastatic lung nodules were significantly greater in the open group (median number: 9.5 vs. 3, p < 0.001). Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were comparable. The median RFS was 15 months (interquartile range [IQR], 6-22) in the open group and 18 months (IQR, 8-47) in the VATS group. The median OS was 28 months (IQR, 14-44) and 29 months (IQR, 15-54) in the open group and VATS group, respectively.

CONCLUSION

One-stage bilateral pulmonary metastasectomy is safe and reduces medical expenditures in selected patients regardless of surgical approach. Although the open group harbored a greater number of metastatic foci, perioperative and oncological outcomes were similar to that of the VATS group.

Simultaneous versus staged resections for bilateral pulmonary metastases

BACKGROUND

For patients with bilateral pulmonary metastases, staged resections have historically been the preferred surgical intervention. During the spring of 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic made patient travel to the hospital challenging and necessitated reduction in operative volume so that resources could be conserved. We report our experience with synchronous bilateral metastasectomies for the treatment of disease in both lungs.

METHODS

Patients with bilateral pulmonary metastases who underwent simultaneous bilateral resections were compared with a cohort of patients who underwent staged resections. We used nearest-neighbor propensity score (1:1) matching to adjust for confounders. Perioperative outcomes were compared between groups using paired statistical analysis techniques.

RESULTS

Between 1998 and 2020, 36 patients underwent bilateral simultaneous metastasectomies. We matched 31 pairs of patients. The length of stay was significantly shorter in patients undergoing simultaneous resection (median 3 vs. 8 days, p < .001) and operative time was shorter (156 vs. 235.5 min, p < .001) when compared to the sum of both procedures in the staged group. The groups did not significantly differ with regard to postoperative complications.

CONCLUSION

In a carefully selected patient population, simultaneous bilateral metastasectomy is a safe option. A single procedure confers benefits for both the patient as well as the hospital resource system.

Tissue Engineering at the Blood-Contacting Surface: A Review of Challenges and Strategies in Vascular Graft Development

Tissue engineered vascular grafts (TEVGs) are beginning to achieve clinical success and hold promise as a source of grafting material when donor grafts are unsuitable or unavailable. Significant technological advances have generated small-diameter TEVGs that are mechanically stable and promote functional remodeling by regenerating host cells. However, developing a biocompatible blood-contacting surface remains a major challenge. The TEVG luminal surface must avoid negative inflammatory responses and thrombogenesis immediately upon implantation and promote endothelialization. The surface has therefore become a primary focus for research and development efforts. The current state of TEVGs is herein reviewed with an emphasis on the blood-contacting surface. General vascular physiology and developmental challenges and strategies are briefly described, followed by an overview of the materials currently employed in TEVGs. The use of biodegradable materials and stem cells requires careful control of graft composition, degradation behavior, and cell recruitment ability to ensure that a physiologically relevant vessel structure is ultimately achieved. The establishment of a stable monolayer of endothelial cells and the quiescence of smooth muscle cells are critical to the maintenance of patency. Several strategies to modify blood-contacting surfaces to resist thrombosis and control cellular recruitment are reviewed, including coatings of biomimetic peptides and heparin.

Pulmonary metastasectomy: outcomes and issues according to the type of surgical resection

According to a recent report by the Committee for Scientific Affairs of the Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery, pulmonary metastasectomy accounted for as many as 10.2 % of all entry cases of general thoracic surgery, and its use is increasing year by year. Accordingly, many studies have examined the surgical procedures used during pulmonary metastasectomy for metastases from primary tumors affecting various organs as well as the outcomes of and indications for such procedures, but some problems remain. In this article, the following questions related to the surgical approach and the type of resection used during pulmonary metastasectomy are reviewed: (1) Wedge resection--what is a safe margin for preventing local recurrence? (2) What is the clinical significance of node sampling/dissection during pulmonary metastasectomy? and (3) When is segmentectomy necessary? In addition, we discuss: (4) open thoracotomy vs. video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), (5) repeated metastasectomy for pulmonary metastases, (6) the surgical approach for bilateral pulmonary metastasectomy, (7) pneumonectomy, and (8) pulmonary metastasectomy combined with resection of the neighboring organs.