Early surgery with aggressive surgical approach to improve 6-month outcomes in patients with active infective endocarditis: contribution of cerebral preoperative magnetic resonance imaging

Impact of Brain MRI on the Diagnosis of Infective Endocarditis and Treatment Decisions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND. Despite increasing use of brain MRI to evaluate patients with suspected infective endocarditis, the clinical impact of brain MRI in this setting has not yet been systematically reviewed. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the frequency of brain MRI findings in patients with suspected or confirmed infective endocarditis and to determine the impact of such findings on clinical decisions. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION. A systematic search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases was performed from January 1, 1990, to December 31, 2020, to identify original research investigations of brain MRI in patients with suspected or confirmed infective endocarditis. Study quality was assessed with QUADAS-2. Study endpoints included the frequency of brain MRI findings and the frequency of diagnostic modifications, modification of therapeutic plan, and modification of valve surgery plan resulting from MRI findings. Frequencies were pooled by means of the inverse variance method. Subgroup analysis was performed. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS. A total of 21 studies with 2133 patients were included. Overall study quality was considered moderate. In terms of brain MRI findings, the pooled frequency of acute ischemic lesions was 61.9% (95% CI, 50.7-71.9%); of cerebral microbleeds, 52.9% (95% CI, 41.6-63.9%); hemorrhagic lesions, 24.7% (95% CI, 15.1-37.9%); abscess or meningitis, 9.5% (95% CI, 5.6-15.6%); and intracranial mycotic aneurysm, 6.2% (95% CI, 4.0-9.4%). Subgroup analysis after exclusion of three studies in which neurologic findings were the indication for all brain MRI examinations yielded similar frequencies of these findings. Six studies included results on the impact of brain MRI findings on clinical decisions. The frequencies of diagnostic modifications in two studies were 5.4% and 32.1%. The pooled frequency of therapeutic plan modification in six studies was 12.8% (95% CI, 6.5-23.7%) and of surgical plan modification in five studies was 14.2% (95% CI, 8.2-23.4%). CONCLUSION. In patients with suspected or confirmed infective endocarditis, brain MRI examinations commonly show relevant abnormalities that affect diagnostic and therapeutic clinical decisions. CLINICAL IMPACT. The findings support a potential role for screening brain MRI in the evaluation of patients with suspected or confirmed infective endocarditis, regardless of the presence or absence of neurologic symptoms.

Infective Endocarditis: New Challenges in a Classic Disease

Infective endocarditis is a relatively rare, but deadly infection, with an overall mortality of around 20% in most series. Clinical manifestations have evolved in response to significant epidemiological shifts in industrialized nations, with a move toward a nosocomial or health-care-related pattern, in older patients, with more episodes associated with prostheses and/or intravascular electronic devices and a predominance of staphylococcal and enterococcal etiology.Diagnosis is often challenging and is based on the conjunction of clinical, microbiological, and imaging information, with notable progress in recent years in the accuracy of echocardiographic data, coupled with the recent emergence of other useful imaging techniques such as cardiac computed tomography (CT) and nuclear medicine tools, particularly ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission/CT.The choice of an appropriate treatment for each specific case is complex, both in terms of the selection of the appropriate agent and doses and durations of therapy as well as the possibility of using combined bactericidal antibiotic regimens in the initial phase and finalizing treatment at home in patients with good evolution with outpatient oral or parenteral antimicrobial therapies programs. A relevant proportion of patients will also require valve surgery during the active phase of treatment, the timing of which is extremely difficult to define. For all the above, the management of infective endocarditis requires a close collaboration of multidisciplinary endocarditis teams.

Aggressive early surgical strategy in patients with intracranial hemorrhage: a new cardiopulmonary bypass option

OBJECTIVE

We present a novel strategy in cardiac surgery with a cardiopulmonary bypass with low-dose heparin and Nafamostat mesylate as an anticoagulant (NM-CPB), which reduces postoperative neurological complications.

METHOD AND RESULTS

19 patients with a mean age of 63.6 ± 20.2 years (range 24-91) and an indication of early cardiac surgery with intracranial complication (ICC) underwent surgery with NM-CPB. The preoperative diagnoses included seven cases of infective endocarditis and six of left atrial appendage thrombosis. ICC were noticed in seven cases with hemorrhages (hemorrhagic infarction: n = 4, subarachnoid hemorrhage: n = 3) and 12 without hemorrhage (large infarction: n = 10, small-multiple infarction at the risk for hemorrhagic transformation: n = 2). The mean interval between a diagnosis and cardiac surgery was 1.1 ± 1.5 days in the ICH cases and 1.4 ± 1.4 days otherwise. In-hospital mortality was 5.3%. The mean CPB time was 146.7 ± 66.03 min, the mean dose of NM, heparin were 2.23 ± 1.59 mg/kg/hr and 56.8 ± 20.3 IU/kg, respectively. The mean activated clotting time (ACT) was 426.8 ± 112.4 s. No further intracranial bleeding and no new hemorrhages were observed after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

In early cardiac surgery with ICC, especially with hemorrhage, NM-CPB reduced postoperative neurological complications. We plan to use NM-CPB to expand the indications and to establish an early aggressive treatment.

Current Challenges in the Management of Infective Endocarditis

Infective endocarditis is a relatively rare, but deadly cause of sepsis, with an overall mortality ranging from 20 to 25% in most series. Although the classic clinical classification into syndromes of acute or subacute endocarditis have not completely lost their usefulness, current clinical forms have changed according to the profound epidemiological changes observed in developed countries. In this review, we aim to address the changing epidemiology of endocarditis, several recent advances in the understanding of the pathophysiology of endocarditis and endocarditis-triggered sepsis, new useful diagnostic tools as well as current concepts in the medical and surgical management of this disease. Given its complexity, the management of infective endocarditis requires the close collaboration of multidisciplinary endocarditis teams that must decide on the diagnostic approach; the appropriate initial treatment in the critical phase; the detection of patients needing surgery and the timing of this intervention; and finally the accurate selection of patients for out-of-hospital treatment, either at home hospitalization or with oral antibiotic treatment.

Diabetes Mellitus: An Independent Risk Factor of In-Hospital Mortality in Patients with Infective Endocarditis in a New Era of Clinical Practice

Infective endocarditis (IE) is a severe disease with a hospital mortality rate of 17–25%. Early identification of IE patients with high risk of mortality may improve their clinical outcomes. Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) who develop infective diseases are associated with worse outcomes. This study aimed to define the impact of DM on long-term mortality in IE patients. A total of 412 patients with definite IE from February 1999 to June 2012 were enrolled in this observational study and divided into 2 groups: group 1, patients with DM (n = 72) and group 2, patients without DM (n = 340). The overall in-hospital mortality rate for both groups combined was 20.2% and was higher in group 1 than in group 2 (41.7% vs. 16.5%, p < 0.01). Compared to patients without DM, patients with DM were older and associated with higher incidence of chronic diseases, less drug abuse, higher creatinine levels, and increased risk of Staphylococcus aureus infection (all p < 0.05). Moreover, they were more likely to have atypical clinical presentation and were associated with longer IE diagnosis time (all p < 0.05). In multivariable analysis, DM is an independent and significant predictor of mortality. The prognosis of IE patients with DM is still poor. Early identification and more aggressive treatment may be considered in IE patients with DM.