1
|
Sterba KR, Armeson K, Zapka J, Garrett-Mayer E, Scallion ML, Wall TK, Olsen J, Graboyes EM, Alberg AJ, Day TA. A pilot randomized controlled trial to evaluate a survivorship care planning intervention for head and neck cancer survivor-caregiver dyads. J Cancer Surviv 2024; 18:398-411. [PMID: 35761129 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-022-01227-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors and caregivers face significant challenges after treatment. This study's objective was to evaluate the effects of a dyadic survivorship care planning (SCP) intervention on survivor and caregiver outcomes. METHODS This randomized controlled trial enrolled HNC survivors and caregivers within 18 months post-treatment, randomized dyads to SCP (one-session with written SCP and follow-up telephone call) or usual care and administered baseline and 6-month surveys. Multivariable linear regression examined intervention effects on depression and unmet needs in dyads and burden on caregiverss and a set of secondary outcomes. Rating scales and open-ended questions assessed acceptability. RESULTS We randomized 89 survivor-caregiver dyads (42 usual care, 47 SCP dyads). Fidelity to SCP was high for most survivorship domains except discussing care barriers (13%). The most commonly discussed referrals included nutrition (83%) and behavioral medicine (38%), but referral uptake was low. The SCP intervention did not improve depression or unmet needs among dyads or burden among caregivers at 6 months relative to usual care (p's > .05). Nurses and dyads rated SCP favorably with > 80% positive ratings for session length and care plan content. Qualitative findings highlighted that SCP helped consolidate complex clinical information and strengthened survivor-caregiver-clinician relationships. CONCLUSIONS An HNC SCP intervention was acceptable but ineffective in improving dyads' outcomes. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Post-treatment SCP in HNC dyads was ineffective in improving outcomes in survivors and caregivers as delivered in this study. More research is needed to understand how to capitalize on the acceptability of the SCP approach and enhance its effectiveness to support dyads.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine R Sterba
- Department of Public Health Sciences and Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, 68 President Street, MSC 955, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
| | - Kent Armeson
- Department of Public Health Sciences and Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, 68 President Street, MSC 955, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA
| | - Jane Zapka
- Department of Public Health Sciences and Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, 68 President Street, MSC 955, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA
| | - Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer
- Department of Public Health Sciences and Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, 68 President Street, MSC 955, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA
| | - Megan L Scallion
- Department of Public Health Sciences and Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, 68 President Street, MSC 955, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA
| | - Tiffany K Wall
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, 87 Jonathan Lucas Street MSC 955, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA
| | - Jama Olsen
- Department of Public Health Sciences and Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, 68 President Street, MSC 955, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA
| | - Evan M Graboyes
- Department of Public Health Sciences and Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, 68 President Street, MSC 955, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, 87 Jonathan Lucas Street MSC 955, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA
| | - Anthony J Alberg
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street Room 465, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA
| | - Terry A Day
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, 87 Jonathan Lucas Street MSC 955, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Usability: An Introduction to and Literature Review of Usability Testing for Educational Resources in Radiation Oncology. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol 2022; 24:67-72. [PMID: 36262375 PMCID: PMC9574480 DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2022.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Revised: 09/07/2022] [Accepted: 09/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
3
|
Zullig LL, Shahsahebi M, Neely B, Hyslop T, Avecilla RAV, Griffin BM, Clayton-Stiglbauer K, Coles T, Owen L, Reeve BB, Shah K, Shelby RA, Sutton L, Dinan MA, Zafar SY, Shah NP, Dent S, Oeffinger KC. Low-touch, team-based care for co-morbidity management in cancer patients: the ONE TEAM randomized controlled trial. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2021; 22:234. [PMID: 34794388 PMCID: PMC8600877 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-021-01569-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Background As treatments for cancer have improved, more people are surviving cancer. However, compared to people without a history of cancer, cancer survivors are more likely to die of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Increased risk for CVD-related mortality among cancer survivors is partially due to lack of medication adherence and problems that exist in care coordination between cancer specialists, primary care physicians, and cardiologists. Methods/Design The Onco-primary care networking to support TEAM-based care (ONE TEAM) study is an 18-month cluster-randomized controlled trial with clustering at the primary care clinic level. ONE TEAM compares the provision of the iGuide intervention to patients and primary care providers versus an education-only control. For phase 1, at the patient level, the intervention includes video vignettes and a live webinar; provider-level interventions include electronic health records-based communication and case-based webinars. Participants will be enrolled from across North Carolina one of their first visits with a cancer specialist (e.g., surgeon, radiation or medical oncologist). We use a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART) design. Outcomes (measured at the patient level) will include Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) quality measures of management of three CVD comorbidities using laboratory testing (glycated hemoglobin [A1c], lipid profile) and blood pressure measurements; (2) medication adherence assessed pharmacy refill data using Proportion of Days Covered (PDC); and (3) patient-provider communication (Patient-Centered Communication in Cancer Care, PCC-Ca-36). Primary care clinics in the intervention arm will be considered non-responders if 90% or more of their participating patients do not meet the modified HEDIS quality metrics at the 6-month measurement, assessed once the first enrollee from each practice reaches the 12-month mark. Non-responders will be re-randomized to either continue to receive the iGuide 1 intervention, or to receive the iGuide 2 intervention, which includes tailored videos for participants and specialist consults with primary care providers. Discussion As the population of cancer survivors grows, ONE TEAM will contribute to closing the CVD outcomes gap among cancer survivors by optimizing and integrating cancer care and primary care teams. ONE TEAM is designed so that it will be possible for others to emulate and implement at scale. Trial registration This study (NCT04258813) was registered in clinicaltrals.gov on February 6, 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leah L Zullig
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School Of Medicine, 215 Morris St, Durham, NC, 27701, USA. .,Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, 411 West Chapel Hill Street, Suite 600, Durham, NC, 27701, USA.
| | - Mohammad Shahsahebi
- Duke University Family Medicine and Community Health, 2424 Erwin Rd, Ste 601, DUMC, Box 2714, Durham, NC, 27705, USA.,Center for Onco-Primary Care, Duke Cancer Institute, 2424 Erwin Road, Hock Plaza, Ste 601, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
| | - Benjamin Neely
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, 2424 Erwin Rd, Durham, NC, 27701, USA
| | - Terry Hyslop
- Department of Biostatistics, Duke University, 2424 Erwin Road, 9064 Hock Plaza, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
| | - Renee A V Avecilla
- Center for Onco-Primary Care, Duke Cancer Institute, 2424 Erwin Road, Hock Plaza, Ste 601, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
| | - Brittany M Griffin
- Center for Onco-Primary Care, Duke Cancer Institute, 2424 Erwin Road, Hock Plaza, Ste 601, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
| | - Kacey Clayton-Stiglbauer
- Center for Onco-Primary Care, Duke Cancer Institute, 2424 Erwin Road, Hock Plaza, Ste 601, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
| | - Theresa Coles
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School Of Medicine, 215 Morris St, Durham, NC, 27701, USA
| | - Lynda Owen
- Duke Cancer Network, 20 Duke Medicine Circle, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Bryce B Reeve
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School Of Medicine, 215 Morris St, Durham, NC, 27701, USA
| | - Kevin Shah
- Duke Institute for Health Innovation, Duke University Health System, 200 Morris St, Durham, NC, 27701, USA
| | - Rebecca A Shelby
- Duke Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, 2200 W. Main St, Ste 340, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
| | - Linda Sutton
- Duke Cancer Network, 20 Duke Medicine Circle, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Michaela A Dinan
- Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, 60 College Street, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA
| | - S Yousuf Zafar
- Duke University School of Medicine, 2200 W. Main St, Ste 340, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
| | - Nishant P Shah
- Duke Heart Center, Duke University School of Medicine, 2200 W. Main St, Ste 340, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
| | - Susan Dent
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, 2200 W. Main St, Ste 340, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
| | - Kevin C Oeffinger
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, 2200 W. Main St, Ste 340, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhang Y, Joshy G, Glass K, Banks E. Physical functional limitations and psychological distress in people with and without colorectal cancer: findings from a large Australian study. J Cancer Surviv 2020; 14:894-905. [PMID: 32613443 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-020-00901-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2020] [Accepted: 05/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To quantify physical disability and psychological distress in people with and without colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS Questionnaire data (2006-2009) from 267,153 Australian general population members aged ≥ 45 years participating in the 45 and Up Study (n = 213,231 following exclusions) were linked to cancer registry and hospital admission data, to ascertain CRC status. Modified Poisson regression estimated adjusted prevalence ratios (PRs) for physical disability and psychological distress in participants with CRC versus those without. RESULTS Compared with participants without CRC (n = 210,836), CRC survivors (n = 2395) had significantly higher physical disability prevalence (11.9% versus 19.5%, respectively), PR = 1.11 (95% CI = 1.03-1.20); and a similar prevalence of distress (23.1% versus 20.2%), PR = 1.03 (0.94-1.20). Adverse outcomes were associated with certain clinical characteristics. Compared with participants without CRC, CRC survivors diagnosed 5-< 10 and ≥ 10 years, with regional spread, and without recent cancer treatment had broadly similar outcomes; survivors with metastatic CRC and recent treatment had 30-60% higher prevalence of disability and distress. Compared with participants with neither CRC nor disability, PRs for distress were 4.71 (4.22-5.26) for those with disability and CRC; and 4.22 (4.13-4.31) for those with disability without CRC. CONCLUSIONS Physical disability is elevated in CRC survivors. Psychological distress is elevated 4- to 5-fold with disability, regardless of CRC diagnosis, with lesser increases around diagnosis and treatment. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS CRC survivors with less advanced disease and who have not been recently diagnosed or treated have physical disability and psychological distress comparable to the general population. Survivors with disability are at particularly high risk of psychological distress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuehan Zhang
- National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Grace Joshy
- National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
| | - Kathryn Glass
- National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Emily Banks
- National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
- The Sax Institute, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Davis SN, O'Malley DM, Bator A, Ohman-Strickland P, Clemow L, Ferrante JM, Crabtree BF, Miller SM, Findley P, Hudson SV. Rationale and design of extended cancer education for longer term survivors (EXCELS): a randomized control trial of 'high touch' vs. 'high tech' cancer survivorship self-management tools in primary care. BMC Cancer 2019; 19:340. [PMID: 30971205 PMCID: PMC6458696 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-5531-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2019] [Accepted: 03/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer survivors are at increased risk for late and long-term effects post-treatment. The post-treatment phase of care is often poorly coordinated and survivors navigate follow-up care with minimal information or guidance from their healthcare team. This manuscript describes the Extended Cancer Education for Longer-term Survivors (EXCELS) in Primary Care protocol. EXCELS is a randomized controlled trial to test the efficacy of patient-level self-management educational strategies on adherence to preventative health service use and cancer survivorship follow-up guidelines. Methods The EXCELS trial compares four conditions: (1) EXCELS-website (e.g., a mobile-optimized technology platform); (2) EXCELS-health coaching; (3) EXCELS-website and health coaching; and (4) a print booklet. Approximately 480 breast, colorectal, and prostate survivors will be recruited through the New Jersey Primary Care Research Network (NJPCRN) and New Jersey State Cancer Registry (NJSCR). Eligible survivors (diagnosed stages 1–3) must have completed active treatment, access to a phone and a computer, smartphone or tablet with internet access, and be able to speak and read English. Patient assessments occur at baseline, 6, 12, and 18 months. The primary outcomes are increased engagement in preventive health services and monitoring for cancer recurrence and treatment-related late effects. Discussion The EXCELS trial is the first to test cancer survivorship educational self-management interventions for cancer survivors in a primary care context. Findings from this trial will inform successful implementation and engagement strategies for longer-term, post-treatment cancer survivors managed in primary care settings. Trial registration Registered August 1, 2017 at ClinicalTrials.gov, trial # NCT03233555.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacy N Davis
- Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, 112 Paterson Street, Room 446, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA.,Rutgers School of Public Health, Health Behavior, Society and Policy, Piscataway, NJ, USA.,Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Denalee M O'Malley
- Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, 112 Paterson Street, Room 446, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA.,Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Department of Family, Medicine and Community Health, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Alicja Bator
- Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, 112 Paterson Street, Room 446, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA.,Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Department of Family, Medicine and Community Health, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Pamela Ohman-Strickland
- Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, 112 Paterson Street, Room 446, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA.,Rutgers School of Public Health, Health Behavior, Society and Policy, Piscataway, NJ, USA.,Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Department of Family, Medicine and Community Health, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.,Rutgers School of Public Health, Biostatistics, Piscataway, NJ, USA
| | - Lynn Clemow
- Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, 112 Paterson Street, Room 446, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA.,Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Department of Family, Medicine and Community Health, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Jeanne M Ferrante
- Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, 112 Paterson Street, Room 446, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA.,Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.,Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Department of Family, Medicine and Community Health, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Benjamin F Crabtree
- Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, 112 Paterson Street, Room 446, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA.,Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.,Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Department of Family, Medicine and Community Health, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | | | | | - Shawna V Hudson
- Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, 112 Paterson Street, Room 446, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA. .,Rutgers School of Public Health, Health Behavior, Society and Policy, Piscataway, NJ, USA. .,Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA. .,Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Department of Family, Medicine and Community Health, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
A pilot randomized controlled trial testing a minimal intervention to prepare breast cancer survivors for recovery. Cancer Nurs 2016; 38:E48-56. [PMID: 24831043 DOI: 10.1097/ncc.0000000000000152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Interventions addressing cancer survivors' posttreatment concerns can be time-intensive and require specialized staff. Research is needed to identify feasible minimal intervention strategies to improve survivors' quality of life after treatment. OBJECTIVES The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and short-term impact of a minimal clinic intervention on breast cancer survivors' quality of life, unmet needs, distress, and cancer worry. INTERVENTIONS/METHODS In this randomized controlled pilot trial, we enrolled breast cancer survivors at the end of treatment and administered baseline surveys. Participants were randomized to study arm (4-week video plus educational booklet intervention group and usual care group) and completed follow-up surveys at 10 weeks. Linear regression was used to examine intervention effects on quality of life outcomes controlling for clinical and demographic factors. Open-ended questions were used to examine program satisfaction and obtain feedback to improve the intervention. RESULTS We enrolled 92 survivors in the trial. Participants rated the intervention highly and reported feeling less isolated and having more realistic expectations about their recovery after completing the program. Despite positive qualitative findings, no significant intervention effects were observed for quality of life, unmet needs, distress, or cancer worry in unadjusted or adjusted analyses. CONCLUSIONS Future research is needed to define optimal intervention elements to prepare breast cancer survivors for the posttreatment period. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Effective survivorship interventions may require more intensive components such as clinical input and longer follow-up periods.
Collapse
|
7
|
Williams JP, Calvi L, Chakkalakal JV, Finkelstein JN, O’Banion MK, Puzas E. Addressing the Symptoms or Fixing the Problem? Developing Countermeasures against Normal Tissue Radiation Injury. Radiat Res 2016; 186:1-16. [PMID: 27332954 PMCID: PMC4991354 DOI: 10.1667/rr14473.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqueline P. Williams
- Department of Environmental Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Laura Calvi
- Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Joe V. Chakkalakal
- Center for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Jacob N. Finkelstein
- Department of Environmental Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
- Department of Pediatrics and Neonatology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - M. Kerry O’Banion
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Edward Puzas
- Center for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Turkman YE, Kennedy HP, Harris LN, Knobf MT. "An addendum to breast cancer": the triple negative experience. Support Care Cancer 2016; 24:3715-21. [PMID: 27037812 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-016-3184-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2015] [Accepted: 03/21/2016] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) subtype, known to be aggressive with high recurrence and mortality rates, disproportionately affects African-Americans, young women, and BRCA1 carriers. TNBC does not respond to hormonal or biologic agents, limiting treatment options. The unique characteristics of the disease and the populations disproportionately affected indicate a need to examine the responses of this group. No known studies describe the psychosocial experiences of women with TNBC. The purpose of this study is to begin to fill that gap and to explore participants' psychosocial needs. METHOD An interpretive descriptive qualitative approach was used with in-depth interviews. A purposive sample of adult women with TNBC was recruited. Dominant themes were extracted through iterative and constant comparative analysis. RESULTS Of the 22 participants, nearly half were women of color, and the majority was under the age of 60 years and within 5 years of diagnosis. The central theme was a perception of TNBC as "an addendum" to breast cancer. There were four subthemes: TNBC is Different: "Bottom line, it's not good"; Feeling Insecure: "Flying without a net"; Decision-Making and Understanding: "A steep learning curve"; and Looking Back: "Coulda, shoulda, woulda." Participants expressed a need for support in managing intense uncertainty with a TNBC diagnosis and in decision-making. CONCLUSIONS Women with all subtypes of breast cancer have typically been studied together. This is the first study on the psychosocial needs specifically of women with TNBC. The findings suggest that women with TNBC may have unique experiences and unmet psychosocial needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasemin E Turkman
- University of Virginia School of Nursing, 202 Lancaster Way, Charlottesville, VA, 22903, USA.
| | | | - Lyndsay N Harris
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Case Western University Medical School, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - M Tish Knobf
- Yale School of Nursing in West Haven, West Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Walker R, Szanton SL, Wenzel J. Working Toward Normalcy Post-Treatment: A Qualitative Study of Older Adult Breast and Prostate Cancer Survivors. Oncol Nurs Forum 2015; 42:E358-67. [PMID: 26488842 PMCID: PMC4750471 DOI: 10.1188/15.onf.e358-e367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES To develop a better understanding of how older adult survivors of early-stage breast and prostate cancer managed the work of recovery.
. RESEARCH APPROACH Multiple case study design embedded in a larger randomized, controlled trial of a nurse-led patient navigation intervention.
. SETTING Community-based research conducted via in-home visits and by phone with participants residing in non-metropolitan areas of a mid-Atlantic state.
PARTICIPANTS Rural-dwelling adults aged 60 years or older with early-stage breast or prostate cancer and the people who support them (11 dyads).
METHODOLOGIC APPROACH An approach to grounded theory analysis was used to evaluate the fit between existing theoretical knowledge and case findings and to generate new knowledge about the cancer recovery process.
FINDINGS Working toward normalcy was a core process of cancer recovery prompted by participants' internal experiences and external interactions with their environments. This ongoing, iterative, and active process involved multiple concurrent strategies that were not necessarily medically oriented or cancer specific. Working toward normalcy resulted in movement along a continuum of self-appraisal anchored between participants experiencing life as completely disrupted by cancer to a life back to normal. A greater sense of normalcy was associated with higher engagement in valued activities and increased physical and psychological well-being.
CONCLUSIONS In addition to the core process of working toward normalcy, multiple theories from nursing, sociology, psychology, and gerontology helped to explain case findings. This knowledge could serve as a foundation on which to design survivorship care that supports the goals of cancer survivors working toward normalcy post-treatment. INTERPRETATION Post-treatment wellness goals can include a desire to reestablish or maintain a sense of normalcy. Nursing actions that promote survivors' efforts to be perceived as capable, stay engaged in valued activities and roles, maintain a sense of control over their lives and bodies, and make plans for the future may help meet this goal. Existing theories about identity, dignity, inner strength, and the work of illness can inform nursing interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Walker
- Assistant professor in the College of Nursing at the University of Massachusetts Amherst
| | - Sarah L. Szanton
- Associate professor in the Department of Community and Public Health, School of Nursing at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, MD
| | - Jennifer Wenzel
- Assistant professor in the Department of Acute and Chronic Care, School of Nursing at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Miller SM, Hudson SV, Hui SKA, Diefenbach MA, Fleisher L, Raivitch S, Belton T, Roy G, Njoku A, Scarpato J, Viterbo R, Buyyounouski M, Denlinger C, Miyamoto C, Reese A, Baman J. Development and preliminary testing of PROGRESS: a Web-based education program for prostate cancer survivors transitioning from active treatment. J Cancer Surviv 2015; 9:541-53. [PMID: 25697335 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-015-0431-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2014] [Accepted: 01/22/2015] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This formative research study describes the development and preliminary evaluation of a theory-guided, online multimedia psycho-educational program (PROGRESS) designed to facilitate adaptive coping among prostate cancer patients transitioning from treatment into long-term survivorship. METHODS Guided by the Cognitive-Social Health Information Processing Model (C-SHIP) and using health communications best practices, we conducted a two-phase, qualitative formative research study with early stage prostate cancer patients (n = 29) to inform the Web program development. Phase 1 included individual (n = 5) and group (n = 12) interviews to help determine intervention content and interface. Phase 2 employed iterative user/usability testing (n = 12) to finalize the intervention. Interview data were independently coded and collectively analyzed to achieve consensus. RESULTS Survivors expressed interest in action-oriented content on (1) managing treatment side effects, (2) handling body image and comorbidities related to overweight/obesity, (3) coping with emotional and communication issues, (4) tips to reduce disruptions of daily living activities, and (5) health skills training tools. Patients also desired the use of realistic and diverse survivor images. CONCLUSIONS Incorporation of an established theoretical framework, application of multimedia intervention development best practices, and an evidence-based approach to content and format resulted in a psycho-educational tool that comprehensively addresses survivors' needs in a tailored fashion. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS The results suggest that an interactive Web-based multimedia program is useful for survivors if it covers the key topics of symptom control, emotional well-being, and coping skills training; this tool has the potential to be disseminated and implemented as an adjunct to routine clinical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanne M Miller
- Department of Psychosocial and Behavioral Medicine, Fox Chase Cancer Center/Temple University Health System, Robert C. Young Pavilion, 333 Cottman Avenue-4th Floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Burris JL, Armeson K, Sterba KR. A closer look at unmet needs at the end of primary treatment for breast cancer: a longitudinal pilot study. Behav Med 2015; 41:69-76. [PMID: 24512316 PMCID: PMC4127370 DOI: 10.1080/08964289.2014.889068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
This study describes the nature of unmet needs (UN) as women with breast cancer transition from "patient" to "survivor." Data are from a longitudinal study of 90 women with stage I-III breast cancer. Data were collected 2-3 weeks before, and 10 weeks after, completion of radiation. A modified Cancer Survivors' Unmet Needs (CaSUN) instrument measured UN. Most participants reported ≥1 unmet need at baseline (80.00%) and follow-up (69.31%), with UN across physical, healthcare, information, psychosocial, and survivorship domains. Total number of UN declined over time, t(87) = 3.00, p < .01. UN likely to persist from baseline to follow-up involved cancer recurrence concerns, stress management, household responsibilities, and others not acknowledging/understanding cancer. Younger women (p = .01) and those with more severe (p < .01), life-interfering (p = .01) symptoms had greater burden of UN. This study highlights the dynamics of UN in the weeks before and after primary treatment. Future studies should identify long-term consequences of persistent UN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica L. Burris
- Postdoctoral Fellow, Medical University of South Carolina, Hollings Cancer Center & Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences; 859-876-2344 (fax); ,Corresponding author, Jessica L. Burris, Ph.D., Medical University of South Carolina, Hollings Cancer Center – Cancer Control Program, 86 Jonathan Lucas St., MSC 955, Charleston, SC 29425, USA, 843-876-2446 (Phone), 859-876-2344 (Fax),
| | - Kent Armeson
- Research Instructor, Medical University of South Carolina, Hollings Cancer Center & Department of Public Health Sciences; 859-792-4233 (fax);
| | - Katherine Regan Sterba
- Assistant Professor, Medical University of South Carolina, Hollings Cancer Center & Department of Public Health Sciences; 859-876-2344 (fax);
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
LeMasters T, Madhavan S, Sambamoorthi U, Kurian S. A population-based study comparing HRQoL among breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer survivors to propensity score matched controls, by cancer type, and gender. Psychooncology 2013; 22:2270-82. [PMID: 23606210 PMCID: PMC4892175 DOI: 10.1002/pon.3288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2012] [Revised: 02/21/2013] [Accepted: 03/04/2013] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Objectives were to compare health-related quality of life (HRQoL) between breast cancer survivors, prostate cancer survivors (PCS), and colorectal cancer survivors (CCS) to matched controls, stratified by short and long-term survivors, by cancer type, and gender. METHODS By using the 2009 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, propensity scores matched three controls to adult survivors >1 year past diagnosis (N = 11,964) on age, gender, race/ethnicity, income, insurance status, and region of the USA Chi-square tests and logistic regression models compared HRQoL outcomes (life satisfaction, activity limitations, sleep quality, emotional support, general, physical, and mental health). RESULTS Although all cancer survivors reported worse general health (p < 0.000) and more activity limitations (p < 0.004) than controls, these disparities decreased among long-term survivors. Short-term PCS and male CCS were more likely to report worse outcomes across additional domains of HRQoL than controls, but PCS were 0.61, 0.63, and 0.70 times less likely to report activity limitations, fair/poor general health, and 1-15 bad physical health days in the past month than male CCS. Breast cancer survivors and female CCS were 2.12 and 3.17, 1.58 and 1.86, and 1.49 and 153, respectively, times more likely to report rarely/never receiving needed emotional support, 1-15 bad mental health days in the past month, and not receiving enough sleep 1-15 days in the past month than PCS and male CCS. CONCLUSIONS Cancer survivors experience worse HRQoL than similar individuals without a history of cancer and the severity of affected HRQoL domains differ by time since diagnosis, cancer type, and gender.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Traci LeMasters
- West Virginia University, School of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Systems and Policy, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - Suresh Madhavan
- West Virginia University, School of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Systems and Policy, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - Usha Sambamoorthi
- West Virginia University, School of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Systems and Policy, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - Sobha Kurian
- West Virginia University, Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center, Morgantown, WV, USA
| |
Collapse
|