Rehabilitation interventions for the management of breast cancer-related lymphedema: developing a patient-centered, evidence-based plan of care throughout survivorship

Barriers and facilitators to implementation of APTA's breast cancer-related lymphedema diagnosis and intervention clinical practice guidelines

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to identify barriers and facilitators influencing implementation of the diagnosis and intervention clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) related to the management of patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL).

METHODS

A descriptive, cross-sectional web-based survey was conducted. Participants included physical therapists and assistants who were members of the APTA's Academy of Oncologic Physical Therapy and Lymphology Association of North America. Desriptive statisitcs were computed for all demographic and barriers and facilitators data. Individual exploratory factor analyses (EFA) were performed on survey items for both CPGs to identify themes of barriers and facilitators to implementation.

RESULTS

A total of 180 respondents completed the survey. 34.9% of respondents read the diagnosis CPG and 22.4% read the intervention CPG. A total of 77.8% reported that they did not have issues in changing their clinical routines and 69.5% did not have resistance working according to CPGs. The EFA resulted in 3 themes for each CPG, accounting for 46% of the variance for the diagnostic CPG and 54% of the variance for the intervention CPG. The 3 themes, clinician characteristics, patient demographics, therapist practice setting and beliefs/values, were weighted differently for each EFA.

CONCLUSION

Most respondents did not read either CPG, however, report a willingness to make changes to clinical practice and utilization of CPGs. For those who have attempted to implement the CPGs, this study was the first to identify the barriers and facilitators impacting the implementation of the CPGs related to the management of BCRL.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

The results will inform the development of targeted implementation strategies to improve access to and adherence to recommendations from the CPGs ultimately improving the efficiency and efficacy of care delivery to patients.

Practice patterns of physical therapists and physical therapist assistants treating patients with breast cancer related lymphedema

Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) aim to improve patient outcomes through implementation of proven interventions and decrease variation in practices. The relevance of this article is to describe the current state practice of physical therapists who diagnose and treat patients with Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema (BCRL). It also provides a description of physical therapist-reported adherence to the BCRL CPG recommendations which establishes the need for implementation interventions to improve adherence.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to describe practice patterns of physical therapists (PT) and physical therapist assistants (PTA) who treat patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema and determine if they are adherent to best evidence recommendations for lymphedema diagnosis and intervention.

METHODS

An electronic survey to collect practice pattern data of PTs and PTAs who treat patients with BCRL was distributed. A descriptive and quantitative statistical analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-six percent of respondents read the American Physical Therapy Association sponsored lymphedema diagnosis clinical practice guideline (CPG) and 20% read the lymphedema intervention CPG. Lymphoscintigraphy was the only diagnosis or intervention tool with a significant difference in use between therapists who read versus did not read the CPGs. Adherence to "should do" recommendations was variable: bioimpedance (18.2%), volume calculation (49.3%), ultrasound (0%), patient reported outcome tools (64.9%), compression garments (43.9%), exercise (87.2%), and compression bandaging (56.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

There is variability in adherence to recommendations for both the lymphedema diagnosis and intervention CPGs. Interventions to improve implementation and adherence to CPG recommendations are warranted.

Surgical Treatment and Rehabilitation Strategies for Upper and Lower Extremity Lymphedema: A Comprehensive Review

Lymphedema is a chronic disabling condition affecting a growing number of patients worldwide. Although lymphedema is not life-threatening, several reports underlined detrimental consequences in terms of distress, pain, functional impairment, and infections with a relevant decrease in quality of life. Currently, there is no cure, and the therapeutic management of this condition aims at slowing down the disease progression and preventing secondary complications. Early diagnosis is paramount to enhance the effects of rehabilitation or surgical treatments. On the other hand, a multidisciplinary treatment should be truly integrated, the combination of microsurgical and reductive procedures should be considered a valid strategy to manage extremity lymphedema, and rehabilitation should be considered the cornerstone of the multidisciplinary treatment not only for patients not suitable for surgical interventions but also before and after surgical procedures. Therefore, a specialized management of Plastic Reconstructive Surgeons and Physical and Rehabilitative Medicine physicians should be mandatory to address patients’ needs and optimize the treatment of this disabling and detrimental condition. Therefore, the aim of this review was to characterize the comprehensive management of lymphedema, providing a broad overview of the potential therapy available in the current literature to optimize the comprehensive management of lymphedema and minimize complications.

Breast Cancer Survivorship: the Role of Rehabilitation According to the International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health-a Scoping Review

Purpose of Review

The population of breast cancer (BC) survivors is growing due to earlier diagnosis and effective combined treatments. A scoping review was performed to explore the role of rehabilitation in BC survivorship and the major issues in BC survivors with International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health (ICF) perspective.

Recent Findings

The authors searched PubMed from January 1, 2018, up until November 9, 2021. The 65 selected publications were analyzed with the Comprehensive ICF BC Core Set (CCS) perspective and assigned to the categories of the CCS components along with the 3 areas of health (physical, mental, and social health). The multidimensional aspects of BC survivor disability are evident, whereas the topics of the articles concern several categories of the ICF BC CCS and all 3 areas of health. However, the current ICF BC CCS does not include certain categories related to emerging issues of BC survivorship recurring in the papers.

Summary

Rehabilitation is crucial in BC survivorship management to give personalized answers to women beyond BC, and the ICF BC CCS remains an essential tool in rehabilitation assessment for BC survivors although it needs updating.

Upper limb rehabilitation system based on virtual reality for breast cancer patients: Development and usability study

Background

Functional exercise is crucial for breast cancer patients after surgery, and the use of virtual reality technology to assist patients with postoperative upper limb functional rehabilitation has gradually attracted the attention of researchers. However, the usability of the developed rehabilitation system is still unknown to a large extent. The purpose of this study was to develop a virtual reality upper limb rehabilitation system for patients after breast cancer surgery and to explore its usability.

Methods

We built a multidisciplinary team based on virtual reality and human-computer interaction technology and designed and developed an upper limb function rehabilitation system for breast cancer patients after surgery. Breast cancer patients were recruited from a grade III-a general hospital in Changchun city for the experiment. We used the System Usability Scale to evaluate the system availability, the Presence Questionnaire scale to measure the immersive virtual reality scene, and the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire subjective measurement scale for simulator sickness symptoms.

Results

This upper limb rehabilitation system hardware consisted of Head-mounted Display, a control handle and notebook computers. The software consisted of rehabilitation exercises and game modules. A total of 15 patients were tested on this system, all of whom were female. The mean age was 54.73±7.78 years, and no patients were excluded from the experiment because of adverse reactions such as dizziness and vomiting. The System Usability Scale score was 90.50±5.69, the Presence Questionnaire score was 113.40±9.58, the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire-nausea score was 0.93±1.16, the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire-oculomotor score was 0.80±1.27, the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire-disorientation score was 0.80±1.27, and the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire total score was 2.53±3.40.

Conclusions

This study fills in the blanks regarding the upper limb rehabilitation of breast cancer patients based on virtual reality technology system usability research. As the starting point of research in the future, we will improve the system’s function and design strictly randomized controlled trials, using larger samples in the promotion, to evaluate its application in breast cancer patients with upper limbs and other physiological functions and the feasibility and effects of rehabilitation.