1
|
Griffith ST, Conrow KD, Go M, McEntee ML, Daniulaityte R, Nadesan MH, Swinburne MR, Shill HA, Leung MCK. Cannabis use in Parkinson's disease: Patient access to medical cannabis and physician perspective on product safety. Neurotoxicology 2024; 103:198-205. [PMID: 38834158 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuro.2024.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2023] [Revised: 05/27/2024] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/06/2024]
Abstract
The rate of medical cannabis use has increased in parallel with the number of states legalizing its use. Parkinson's disease (PD) patients are of particular concern due to their higher cannabis use rate than in the general US population (25-40 % PD patient cannabis users vs. ∼18 % in the general population), as well as their susceptibility to environmental contaminants in cannabis, including pesticides, toxic elements, solvents, microbes, and mycotoxins. In order to address the complex nature of this industry, we examined the changes in PD-related qualifying conditions in the U.S. from 2019 to 2023. We also conducted an online survey to gain insight into the knowledge, risk perceptions, and opinions regarding medical cannabis and contamination issues from physicians who treated PD patients. The number of states including PD-related qualifying conditions increased over the past 5 years from 28 to 36 states. These conditions included PD (increasing from 14 to 16 states), muscle spasms (14 to 24), anxiety (1 to 5), and pain (17 to 35). State-by-state comparisons revealed high variability in the language used to describe the different qualifying conditions. Online surveys were sent out to 45 neurologists and movement disorder specialists who primarily treated PD patients. The response rate was 44 % from nine states (AZ, CA, FL, MA, MN, WI, PA, IL, and NM). When asked if they were aware of any contaminants in cannabis products, we found that 65 % of the physicians were unaware of any contaminants commonly found in cannabis and only 25 %, 15 %, and 15 % of them were aware of pesticide, toxic element, and solvent contaminants, respectively. In their free-text opinion response on the health impact of cannabis-borne contaminants, "long-term effect" (35 %) and "comorbidities and PD prognosis" (40 %) were identified as the two most common themes. These results point to the need for further regulatory deliberation regarding risks and susceptibility to cannabis contaminants. Additionally, education is needed to inform physicians on cannabis safety issues. Further research will identify the implementation strategies to reduce contaminant exposure and protect patient health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Symone T Griffith
- College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, United States; ASU-Banner Neurodegenerative Disease Research Center, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States
| | - Kendra D Conrow
- School of Mathematical and Natural Sciences, Arizona State University, Glendale, AZ, United States
| | - Michael Go
- College of Arts and Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Mindy L McEntee
- College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Raminta Daniulaityte
- College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Majia H Nadesan
- School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Arizona State University, Glendale, AZ, United States
| | - Mathew R Swinburne
- Francis King Carey School of Laws, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Holly A Shill
- Muhammad Ali Parkinson Center, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Maxwell C K Leung
- College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, United States; ASU-Banner Neurodegenerative Disease Research Center, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States; School of Mathematical and Natural Sciences, Arizona State University, Glendale, AZ, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Osaghae I, Talluri R, Chido‐Amajuoyi OG, Tanco K, Shah DP, Pande M, Shete S. Awareness and interest in cannabis use for cancer management among cancer survivors. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e6902. [PMID: 38180296 PMCID: PMC10807618 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2023] [Revised: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We examined the awareness, interest, and information sources relating to cannabis use for cancer management (including management of cancer symptoms and treatment-related side effects) and determined factors associated with cancer survivors' awareness and interest in learning about cannabis use for cancer management. METHODS This was a cross-sectional study of adult cancer survivors (N = 1886) receiving treatment at a comprehensive cancer center. Weighted prevalence and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted. RESULTS Among cancer survivors, 88% were aware and 60% were interested in learning about cannabis use for cancer management. Common sources of information to learn about cannabis use for cancer management were cancer doctors/nurses (82%), other patients with cancer (27%), websites/blogs (26%), marijuana stores (20%), and family/friends (18%). The odds of being aware of cannabis use for cancer management was lower among male compared to female survivors (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.41-0.90), non-Hispanic Blacks compared to non-Hispanic Whites (AOR: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.21-0.62), and survivors who do not support the legalization of cannabis for medical use compared to those who do (AOR: 0.10; 95% CI: 0.04-0.23). On the other hand, the odds of being interested in cannabis use for cancer management was higher among non-Hispanic Blacks compared to non-Hispanic Whites (AOR: 1.65; 95% CI: 1.04-2.62), and among cancer survivors actively undergoing cancer treatment compared to patients on non-active treatment (AOR: 2.25; 95% CI: 1.74-2.91). CONCLUSION Awareness of cannabis use for cancer management is high within the cancer survivor population. Results indicated health care providers are leading information source and should receive continued medical education on cannabis-specific guidelines. Similarly, tailored educational interventions are needed to guide survivors on the benefits and risks of cannabis use for cancer management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ikponmwosa Osaghae
- Department of EpidemiologyThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
- Department of BiostatisticsThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Population SciencesThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Rajesh Talluri
- Department of BiostatisticsThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
- Department of Data ScienceUniversity of Mississippi Medical CenterJacksonMississippiUSA
| | | | - Kimberson Tanco
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation and Integrative MedicineThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Dimpy P. Shah
- Mays Cancer Center, UT Health San Antonio MD Anderson Cancer CenterSan AntonioTexasUSA
| | - Mala Pande
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and NutritionThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Sanjay Shete
- Department of EpidemiologyThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
- Department of BiostatisticsThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Population SciencesThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| |
Collapse
|