Preoperative curves of greater magnitude (>70°) in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis are associated with increased surgical complexity, higher cost of surgical treatment and a delayed return to function

A Novel Deformity Correction Manipulation System for Better Correction of Large Thoracic Scoliosis

OBJECTIVE

Treating patients with large thoracic scoliosis (between 70° and 100°) poses technical challenges, particularly with traditional correction techniques (TCT). To address this, we developed a novel deformity correction manipulation system (DCMS) aimed at reducing surgical complexity and trauma. This study aims to assess the safety and effectiveness of DCMS in treating large thoracic scoliosis.

METHODS

From January 2016 to June 2021, 76 patients with large thoracic scoliosis were included in this retrospective study. The patients were divided into two groups: DCMS (n = 34) and TCT (n = 42). Basic patient data including age at surgery, sex, etiology, Risser sign, flexibility of the main thoracic curve, instrumented levels, number of screws, duration of hospital stay, and follow-up time were collected and analyzed. Radiographic and clinical outcomes, as measured by various radiographic parameters and Scoliosis Research Society-30 (SRS-30) scores, were retrospectively analyzed and compared between the two groups. Adverse events were also documented. Statistical analyses were performed using two-tailed independent t-tests, chi-square tests, and Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

The DCMS group exhibited significantly shorter operative times, reduced blood loss, and shorter hospital stays compared to the TCT group. However, there were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of age at surgery, sex, etiology, Risser sign, flexibility of the main curve, instrumented levels, number of screws, and follow-up time. While preoperative major curves were statistically similar between the two groups, the DCMS group achieved a superior correction rate compared to the TCT group (74.2% ± 8.8% vs 68.1% ± 10.5%). No significant differences were observed in other radiographic parameters, SRS-30 scores, or the incidence of adverse events.

CONCLUSION

The application of DCMS resulted in shorter operative times, reduced blood loss, shorter hospital stays, and greater curve correction compared to TCT. DCMS proves to be a safe and effective technique for treating large thoracic curves.

Representation and Race in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Research: Disparities in Curve Magnitude and Follow-Up

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE

The present study aims to determine if the racial representation of patients enrolled in a large prospective scoliosis registry is reflective of the general United States population. Further, we studied whether there was an association between race, pre-operative parameters, outcomes and loss to follow-up.

METHODS

Prospectively collected data for patients who underwent spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) was reviewed, including self-reported race/ethnicity. The U.S. pediatric population and U.S. patients enrolled in the prospective registry were compared. The data obtained was analyzed for variations between races, for pre-operative variables and follow-up.

RESULTS

Of the 2210 included patients in the registry 66% of patients reported as White, while 52% of the 2018 U.S. pediatric population reported as White. 15% of the registry reported as Hispanic/Latino compared to 22% of the U.S. pediatric population, 13% Black compared to 14% of the U.S. pediatric population, and 4% Asian compared to 5% of the U.S. pediatric population. Asian and White patients had statistically significant higher 2-year follow-up in all but one of six enrollment sites (P < 0.001). Native American, Other, and Hispanic/Latino patients had the highest BMIs. Native American and Black patients had the highest pre-op thoracic Cobb angles. Pre-op ages of Black, Hispanic, and Native American patients were statistically lower (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the association between race and patient follow-up and pre-operative factors in patients who underwent surgery for AIS. Black, Native American, and Hispanic populations were underrepresented both at pre-op and follow-up when compared to their relative proportion in the U.S. pediatric population.

Analysis of duration of different stages of surgery in posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients: comparison between severe versus non-severe AIS

PURPOSE

Prolonged surgical duration in severe adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients is associated with increased blood loss and perioperative complications. The aim of this study was to compare the duration of each stage of posterior spinal fusion (PSF) in severe AIS (Cobb angle ≥ 90°) with non-severe AIS patients. This analysis will identify the most time-consuming stage of PSF and help surgeons formulate strategies to shorten operative time.

METHODS

Retrospective study whereby 90 AIS patients (Lenke type 2, 3, 4, and 6) who underwent PSF from 2019 to 2023 were recruited. Twenty-five severe AIS patients were categorized in Gp1 and 65 non-severe AIS patients in Gp2. Propensity score matching (PSM) with one-to-one with nearest neighbor matching (match tolerance 0.05) was performed. Outcomes measured via operation duration of each stage of surgery, blood loss, number of screws, fusion levels and screw density.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients from each group were matched. Total operative time was significantly higher in Gp1 (168.2 ± 30.8 vs. 133.3 ± 24.0 min, p < 0.001). The lengthiest stage was screw insertion which took 58.5 ± 13.4 min in Gp1 and 44.7 ± 13.7 min in Gp2 (p = 0.001). Screw insertion contributed 39.5% of the overall increased surgical duration in Gp1. Intraoperative blood loss (1022.2 ± 412.5 vs. 714.2 ± 206.7 mL, p = 0.002), number of screws (17.1 ± 1.5 vs. 15.5 ± 1.1, p < 0.001) and fusion level (13.1 ± 0.9 vs. 12.5 ± 1.0, p = 0.026) were significantly higher in Gp1.

CONCLUSION

Screw insertion was the most time-consuming stage of PSF and was significantly longer in severe AIS. Adjunct technologies such as CT-guided navigation and robotic-assisted navigation should be considered to reduce screw insertion time in severe AIS.

Is the morphology of the apical pedicles influenced by apical rotation or the coronal curve magnitude in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?: a radiographic assessment

INTRODUCTION

Asymmetry in pedicle anatomy is most distinctly noted around the apex of the curve. The correlation of pedicle dysmorphia with apical vertebral rotation (AVR) and coronal Cobb angle (CCA) has not been studied.

OBJECTIVE

To establish whether pedicle dysmorphism is linked to curve magnitude CCA and the AVR in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

METHODOLOGY

Preoperative plain whole spine standing radiographs and non-contrast computed tomography (CT) scans of 25 AIS patients that were operated at a single centre from 2013 to 2019 were retrospectively reviewed by 3 independent co-investigators. CCA was noted on the standing radiograph, whereas the AVR was measured on the axial cuts of CT scan. Pedicle morphometric measurements were performed for apical and periapical pedicles. These included apical vertebra (when present), 2 vertebrae above (U1 and U2) and below (B1 and B2) the apex vertebra/disc. The pedicle morphometric measurements were performed on CT scans. We assessed the transverse pedicle diameter, transverse cancellous channel diameter, sagittal pedicle diameter, pedicle length and pedicle axis length. Correlation tests between various pedicle morphometric measurements, AVR and the curve magnitude (Cobb angle) was performed by the Pearson correlation test.

RESULTS

The apex of the major curve was in the thoracic spine in 20 patients, thoracolumbar in three patients and in the lumbar spine in two patients. The mean Cobb angle was 61.5 ± 9.3° and the mean AVR was 28.4 ± 17.8°. A positive correlation was noted with the AVR for U1 concave pedicle length (r = 0.45, p = 0.03), pedicle axis length of the U2 concave pedicle (r = 0.6, p = 0.04), transverse pedicle diameter of the convex apical vertebrae (r = 0.82, p = 0.00009) and the convex apical transverse pedicle diameter (r = 0.80, p = 0.002). A negative correlation with the AVR was noted for U2 convex pedicle length (r = - 0.51, p = 0009), transverse cancellous channel diameter of the U2 concave pedicle (r = - 0.42, p = 0.04) and apical concave pedicle (r = - 0.78, p = 0.002) and the sagittal pedicle diameter for the convex pedicle of U2 (r = - 0.45, p = 0.03) and apex(r = - 0.59, p = 0.04). The Cobb angle did not show a significant correlation with any of the pedicle measurements at any of the levels on the convex and the concave sides.

CONCLUSION

Pedicle asymmetry and dysmorphism demonstrate a morphometric association with the apical vertebral rotation than the curve magnitude. The pedicle length and the pedicle axis length increase on the concave apical and periapical region with increase in AVR. The transverse cancellous channel diameter significantly decreases on the concave apical region with the increase in AVR. The sagittal pedicle diameter decreases on the convex side with the increase in AVR.

Time to surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: How long does it take? A multicenter study

Study design

Retrospective review of multicentric data.

Objectives

To estimate the time from initial visit to surgery in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients and the main reasons for the time to surgery in a multicenter study.

Methods

This retrospective study evaluated 509 patients with AIS from 16 hospitals across six Latin American countries. From each hospital's deformity registry, the following patient data were extracted: demographics, main curve Cobb angle, Lenke Classification at the initial visit and time of surgery, time from indication-for-surgery to surgery, curve progression, Risser skeletal-maturity score and causes for surgical cancelation or delay. Surgeons were asked if they needed to change the original surgical plan due to curve progression. Data also were collected on each hospital's waiting list numbers and mean delay to AIS surgery.

Results

66.8% of the patients waited over six months and 33.9% over a year. Waiting time was not impacted by the patient's age when surgery first became indicated (p = 0.22) but waiting time did differ between countries (p < 0.001) and hospitals (p < 0.001). Longer time to surgery was significantly associated with increasing magnitude of the Cobb angle through the second year of waiting (p < 0.001). Reported causes for delay were hospital-related (48.4%), economic (47.3%), and logistic (4.2%). Oddly, waiting time for surgery did not correlate with the hospital's reported waiting-list lengths (p = 0.57).

Conclusion

Prolonged waits for AIS surgery are common in Latin America, with rare exceptions. At most centers, patients wait over six months, most commonly for economic and hospital-related reasons. Whether this directly impacts surgical outcomes in Latin America still must be studied.

Impacts of the Delayed Surgical Correction of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis and its Repercussions for the Brazilian Unified Health System: Systematic Review Protocol

Surgical correction is an effective treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) with deformities over 45°. In the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS, Sistema Único de Saúde), if the surgical procedure is indicated, the patients are placed on a waiting list and wait until the treatment can be performed. An extended waiting period can be harmful due to worsening symptoms and increased treatment costs. Additionally, it has negative effects on the mental health and quality of life of these patients. This paper is a systematic review protocol to answer the following question: "What is the impact of the delayed surgical correction of AIS considering costs and quality of life?" Collecting health status information is the first step to improve high complex public health actions. Future publications from this protocol may serve as a subsidy to point out potential priority criteria to enhance the global health of AIS patients and the management of Brazilian public health financial resources.

The impacts of waiting for surgical correction of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis and its repercussions for publicly funded health systems: systematic review

PURPOSE

To investigate, through a systematic review, the impact of the waiting time for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) surgical correction from the point of view of deformity evolution, treatment cost, and quality of life.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, LILACS, SciELO, Scopus, Web of Science, LIVIVO, and Cochrane Library databases were searched by two researchers to select the articles. The eligibility criteria were: Patients diagnosed with AIS with indication for surgical correction and submitted to waiting lists until treatment. The risks of bias were evaluated using the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies-Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system was used to classify the level of the evidence for each outcome. The summary of the available evidence is presented in a narrative synthesis.

RESULTS

Six observational studies were included. In a Canadian study, the primary outcome was the need for additional spine surgery in patients who had to wait more than three months due to spine deformity progression. American researchers presented a sample of premenarcheal and skeletally immature patients with AIS showing increased Cobb angle and attributed this to a six-month waiting for the surgical treatment. Another study included 177 patients with AIS with a mean waiting time of 225.7 days. There was a worsening average of 7.7° ± 8.6° in Cobb angle, and there was a change in surgical plan in 28 patients, which increased surgical time. Studies that evaluated the treatment cost showed significantly higher mean costs in those who waited longer than six months. Regarding the quality of life, while waiting for surgery, a retrospective study found that patients who underwent surgery earlier showed better results in a questionnaire that assessed their quality of life compared to those who were still waiting.

CONCLUSION

Observational studies show that, in individuals who are on waiting lists for AIS surgery, there is a worsening of the spinal deformity (substantial evidence), an increasing cost of treatment (moderate evidence) and it may negatively impact patients' quality of life (insufficient evidence). Performing better methodological quality studies to investigate these outcomes can violate good research practices since randomized clinical trials on this subject have ethical limitations to be carried out.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The authors declare that the systematic review protocol was registered at the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO), CRD42020212134, and it was accepted for publication.

Surgical treatment of severe adolescent idiopathic scoliosis through one-stage posterior-only approach: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The aim of this meta-analysis was to analyze the results of one-stage all-posterior spinal fusion for severe adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). A systematic search of articles about one-stage posterior spinal fusion for severe AIS was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Data about population, pre-and postoperative radiographical data, surgical procedure details, and complications were extracted. Meta-analyses were performed when possible. Fourteen studies (640 patients) were included. The mean Cobb angle of the major curve varied from 80.0 ± 7.3 to 110.8 ± 12.1. The meta analysis showed a comprehensive coronal correction rate of the major curve of 58.6%, a comprehensive operative time of 274.5 min, and a comprehensive estimated intraoperative blood loss of 866.5 mL (95% confidence interval: 659.3-1073.6, I 2 ≈ 0%). A total of 48 complications (5.4%) were reported. Overall, the meta-analysis showed a major complication rate of 4%. In seven cases, revision surgery was needed. Posterior-only approach is effective enough to correct severe curves and can spare the patient possible adverse events due to anterior approach. However, when choosing this approach for severe AIS, screw density needs to be high and posterior column osteotomies may need to be planned to mobilize the spine and maximize correction.

Severe Lenke 1 and 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis had poorer perioperative outcome, higher complication rate, longer fusion and higher operative cost compared to non-severe scoliosis

PURPOSE

To compare the perioperative outcome and operative cost of posterior spinal fusion (PSF) surgery between severe and non-severe Lenke 1 and 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients.

METHODS

A total of 509 AIS patients who underwent single-staged PSF between 2013 and 2020 were reviewed. Fifty-four severe scoliosis patients (Cobb angle ≥ 90°) were categorized into Gp1, and 455 non-severe scoliosis (Cobb angle < 90°) patients into Gp2. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis using one-to-one nearest neighbor matching and match tolerance of 0.001 were performed. Outcome measures were operative time, intraoperative blood loss (IBL), allogeneic transfusion rate, perioperative complication, length of stay, fusion level, number of screws used, postoperative Cobb angle, correction rate (CR), side bending correction index (SBCI) and operative cost.

RESULTS

From the PSM analysis, 35 patients from each group were matched. The operative time was 155.9 ± 41.4 and 130.0 ± 30.3 min for Gp1 and Gp2, respectively (p = 0.004). The IBL was 1349.2 ± 1019.0 and 781.9 ± 325.1 mLs for Gp1 and Gp2, respectively (p = 0.003). Fusion level (12.5 ± 0.8 vs. 11.2 ± 1.3, p < 0.001) and number of screws used (16.4 ± 1.6 vs. 14.6 ± 1.4, p < 0.001) were higher in Gp1. Four perioperative complications were observed in Gp1 compared to none in Gp2 (p < 0.039). Gp1 had larger postoperative Cobb angle (p < 0.001), lower CR (p = 0.005) and higher SBCI (p < 0.001). The operative cost was higher in Gp1 (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Severe Lenke 1 and 2 AIS patients had poorer perioperative outcome, higher complication rate, longer fusion and higher operative cost than non-severe AIS.

Parents' information needs, treatment concerns, and psychological well-being when their child is diagnosed with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

We systematically reviewed the experiences of parents who have a child with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in order to understand their needs and concerns related to their child's healthcare, and assist health professionals in supporting parents of this paediatric patient group.

METHODS

A systematic search strategy identified eighteen relevant studies published between 2000 and 2020. Quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and the literature was narratively synthesised.

RESULTS

Three main themes were evident across the literature including information needs, treatment concerns, and psychological well-being. Studies predominantly focused on the surgical treatment of scoliosis.

CONCLUSION

Parents face challenges such as acquiring appropriate knowledge about scoliosis to participate in healthcare decisions and coping with their child undergoing invasive spinal surgery. Throughout this time, their psychological well-being can be negatively impacted. Considering parents' experiences and support needs throughout this anxiety-provoking time is an important step in delivering family-centered care and promoting better outcomes for paediatric patients.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Providing parents with appropriate resources and addressing concerns around surgical complications, postoperative pain, and how they can best support their child before and after surgery, may alleviate some of the emotional burden that parents experience.

Impact of race on outcomes and healthcare utilization following spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

OBJECTIVES

Racial disparities in spine surgery have been shown to impact surgical management and postoperative complications. However, for adolescent patients with idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) treated by posterior spinal fusion (PSF), the influence of race on postoperative outcomes remains unclear. The aim of the study was to investigate the differences in baseline patient demographics, inpatient management, and postoperative complications for adolescents with AIS undergoing elective, posterior spinal surgery (≥ 4 levels).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The Kids' Inpatient Database year 2012 was queried. Adolescent patients (age 10-17 years old) with AIS undergoing elective, PSF (≥ 4 levels) were selected using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification coding system. Patients were divided into 4 cohorts: Black, White, Hispanic, and Other. Patient demographics, comorbidities, complications, length of hospital stay (LOS), discharge disposition and total cost were recorded. The primary outcome was the rate of intraoperative and postoperative complications and resource utilization after elective PSF intervention.

RESULTS

Patient demographics significantly differed between the four cohorts. While age was similar (p = 0.288), the White cohort had a greater proportion of female patients (White: 79.0%; Black: 72.1%; Hispanic: 78.2%; Other: 75.9%, p = 0.006), and the Black cohort had the largest proportion of patients in the 0-25th income quartile (White: 16.1%; Black: 43.3%; Hispanic: 28.0%; Other: 15.3%, p < 0.001). There were significant differences in hospital region (p < 0.001) and bed size (p < 0.001) between the cohorts, with more Hispanic adolescents being treated in the West (White: 21.9%; Black: 8.9%; Hispanic: 40.3%; Other: 29.3%) at small hospitals (White: 14.0%; Black: 13.9%; Hispanic: 16.2%; Other: 7.1%). Baseline comorbidities were similar between the cohorts. The use of blood transfusions was significantly greater in the Black cohort compared to the other racial groups (White: 16.7%; Black: 25.0%; Hispanic: 24.5%; Other: 22.7%, p < 0.001). The number of vertebral levels involved differed significantly between the cohorts (p < 0.001), with the majority of patients having 9-levels or greater involved (White: 80.9%; Black: 81.7%; Hispanic: 84.3%; Other: 67.3%). The rate of complications encountered during admission was greatest in the Other cohort (White: 21.9%; Black: 23.6%; Hispanic: 22.2%; Other: 34.9%, p < 0.001). While LOS was similar between the cohorts (p = 0.702), median total cost of admission was highest for Hispanic patients (White: $49,340 [37,908-65,078]; Black: $47,787 [37,718-64,670]; Hispanic: $54,718 [40,689-69,266]; Other: $54,110 [41,292-71,540], p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that race may not have a significant impact on surgical outcomes after elective posterior spine surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Further studies are necessary to corroborate our findings.

Unmet Needs of Surgical Care for Children: A Case Study in the Brazilian Publicly-Financed Health System

Objective  To measure and document the clinical impact of the waiting time for surgical treatment of patients with spinal deformities in a quaternary center in Brazil.

Methods  In total, 59 patients with spinal deformity waiting for surgery on our hospital's list were evaluated to observe the impact of the waiting time on the progression of the deformity. Patient evaluation was performed using the SRS-22r questionnaire for health-related quality of life (HRQL) and radiographic images to evaluate the deformity of the spine at the time the patients were included in the waiting list and at the most recent appointment. The radiographic parameters selected for comparison were: Cobb angle of the primary and secondary curves, coronal alignment, apical vertebral translation, pelvic obliquity, sagittal vertebral axis, kyphosis (T5-T12), and lordosis (L1-S1).

Results  Low HRQL scores according to the SRS-22r questionnaire were observed in patients waiting for surgery. The radiographic parameters showed progression of the deformity on the initial evaluation when compared with the most recent follow-up evaluation.

Conclusion  The patients waiting for surgical treatment of spinal deformities in our center showed relatively low HRQL scores and radiographic progression of the deformity.

Predicting massive transfusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients undergoing corrective surgery: Association of preoperative radiographic findings

Corrective surgery with a posterior approach for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is often accompanied by considerable bleeding. Massive transfusion after excessive hemorrhage is associated with complications such as hypothermia, coagulopathy, and acid-base imbalance. Therefore, prediction and prevention of massive transfusion are necessary to improve the clinical outcome of AIS patients. We aimed to identify the factors associated with massive transfusion in AIS patients undergoing corrective surgery. We also evaluated the clinical outcomes after massive transfusion.We included and analyzed AIS patients who underwent corrective surgery with a posterior approach from January 2008 to February 2015. We retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical records of 765 consecutive patients. We performed multivariable logistic regression analysis to assess the factors related to massive transfusion. Furthermore, we compared the effects of massive transfusion on clinical outcomes, including postoperative morbidity and hospital stay.Of 765 patients, 74 (9.7%) received massive transfusion. Body mass index (odds ratio [OR] 0.782, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.691-0.885, P < .001) and the number of fused vertebrae (OR 1.322, 95% CI 1.027-1.703, P = .03) were associated with massive transfusion. In the comparison among the different Lenke curve types, Lenke type 4 showed the highest prevalence of massive transfusion. Patients in the massive transfusion group showed a higher incidence rate of postoperative morbidity and prolonged hospital stay.Massive transfusion was required in 9.7% of AIS patients who underwent corrective surgery with a posterior approach. A lower body mass index and higher number of fused vertebrae were associated with massive transfusion. Massive transfusion is related to poor clinical outcomes in AIS patients.

Can surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis of less than 50 degrees of main thoracic curve achieve good results?

BACKGROUND

It is generally recognized that the main thoracic curve Cobb angle threshold for surgical correction is approximately 50 degrees in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Although AIS with a Cobb angle of <50 degrees is sometimes treated surgically to improve cosmesis, the precise outcomes are unclear. This study analyzed the postoperative results for AIS with a main thoracic curve of 50 degrees.

METHODS

Thirty-nine consecutive patients with Lenke type 1-2 curves underwent posterior spinal fusion for AIS. These subjects were divided into the <50 degrees of main thoracic curve group (n = 14) and the ≥50 degrees group (n = 25). Clinical and radiographic data were compared.

RESULTS

The mean Cobb angle of the main thoracic curve before and at 2 years after surgery for the <50 degrees and ≥50 degrees groups was 44.5 and 60.3 degrees (p < 0.001) and 14.0 and 19.5 degrees (p = 0.016), respectively. Preoperatively, both groups had comparable Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) scores (all p > 0.05). Patients with a Cobb angle of <50 degrees displayed significantly milder postoperative pain (4.7 vs. 4.3, p = 0.031), with no remarkable differences in other SRS-22 domain scores. These patients also had a significantly shorter operative time (194 vs. 235 min, p = 0.021) and fused level (9.2 vs. 10.8 vertebrae, p = 0.006) along with similar correction rate (68.1 vs. 65.8%, p = 0.622) and blood loss volume (932 vs. 1009 ml, p = 0.715).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical correction of AIS with <50 degrees of main thoracic curve may less invasively achieve results that are comparable with those for AIS with 50 degrees or more, including improvements in self-image.

Community Care Administration of Spinal Deformities in the Brazilian Public Health System

OBJECTIVE:

Underfunding of the surgical treatment of complex spinal deformities has been an important reason for the steadily growing waiting lists in publicly funded healthcare systems. The aim of this study is to characterize the management of the treatment of spinal deformities in the public healthcare system.

METHODS:

A cross-sectional study of 60 patients with complex pediatric spinal deformities waiting for treatment in December 2013 was performed. The evaluated parameters were place of origin, waiting time until first assessment at a specialized spine care center, waiting time for the surgical treatment, and need for implants not reimbursed by the healthcare system.

RESULTS:

Ninety-one percent of the patients lived in São Paulo State (33% from Ribeirão Preto - DRS XIII). Patients waited for 0.5 to 48.0 months for referral, and the waiting times for surgery ranged from 2 to 117 months. Forty-five percent of the patients required implants for the surgical procedure that were not available.

CONCLUSION:

The current management of patients with spinal deformities in the public healthcare system does not provide adequate treatment for these patients in our region. They experience long waiting periods for referral and prolonged waiting times to receive surgical treatment; additionally, many of the necessary procedures are not reimbursed by the public healthcare system.