Packing versus mushroom catheters following incision and drainage in anorectal abscess

Postoperative packing of perianal abscesses following incision and drainage

A best evidence topic in general surgery was written according to a structured protocol, to address the question: in adult patients with perianal abscesses, should postoperative wound packing be undertaken considering the rates of pain experienced, wound healing and abscess recurrence? The literature search identified 159 papers on Ovid, Embase and Medline and 48 on PubMed. These were independently screened, and three articles were included in this review as these offered the best information to answer the question. One was a systematic review without meta-analysis, one was a randomised controlled trial and one was a multicentre observational study. Review of these articles led the authors to conclude that routine postoperative packing of perianal abscesses following incision and drainage is costly, associated with increased pain and confers no protection against recurrence of abscesses or formation of fistulae.

Drainage of anorectal abscesses in the operating room is associated with a decreased risk of abscess recurrence and fistula formation

BACKGROUND

Timely incision and drainage (I&D) is first line management for anorectal abscesses. We aimed to define current practices in anorectal abscess management and identify factors associated with abscess recurrence and fistula formation.

METHODS

Index episodes of anorectal abscesses treated with I&D in 2014-2018 at a multi-hospital healthcare system were included. Association with one-year abscess recurrence or fistula formation was evaluated using Cox proportional hazard regression. Fistulae were captured only among patients without fistulae at the index operation.

RESULTS

A total of 458 patients met study criteria. One-year rate of abscess recurrence or fistula formation was 20.3%. When compared to bedside procedures, drainage in the operating room was associated with a reduced risk of either recurrence or fistula formation (aHR 0.20 [95%CI 0.114-0.367]).

CONCLUSIONS

Improved exposure and patient comfort in the operating room may allow more complete drainage contributing to decreased rates of abscess recurrence or fistula formation.

Intra-abdominal and Anorectal Abscesses

Intra-abdominal and anorectal abscesses are common pathologies seen in both inpatient and outpatient settings. To decrease morbidity and mortality, early diagnosis and treatment are essential. After adequate drainage via a percutaneous or incisional approach, patients need to be monitored for worsening symptoms or recurrence and evaluated for the underlying condition that may have contributed to abscess formation.

Needle aspiration treatment vs. incision of acute simple perianal abscess: randomized controlled study

PURPOSE

Needle aspiration of an acute simple perianal abscess may be an alternative to conventional incision drainage with potential advantages in wound healing, functional outcome, and quality of life. The aim and objectives of the study are to compare the outcome of needle aspiration and postoperative antibiotics with that of conventional surgical incision drainage of acute perianal abscess. The primary outcome was abscess recurrence. Secondary outcomes were fistula formation, wound healing, quality of life, and fecal continence.

METHODS

This is a three-center randomized controlled trial, including adults with acute perianal abscess. The needle aspiration group received clindamycin for one week postoperatively. All included patients were scheduled for a follow-up at 2, 12, and 52 weeks postoperatively including physical examination, quality of life assessment (SF 36 questionnaire), and fecal continence (Wexner score).

RESULTS

A total of 98 patients were included. The recurrence rate was 41% in needle aspiration and 15% in incision drainage, with HR of 3.033 (p = 0.014). Fistula formation was 15% without significant difference between the groups. There was no significant difference in wound healing, quality of life, or fecal incontinence scores.

CONCLUSION

Needle aspiration with postoperative antibiotics cannot be recommended as an alternative for surgical incision in the treatment of acute perianal abscess.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.org with identification number NCT02585141, initial release on 15 October 2015.