1
|
Boyle M, Pons A, Alshammari A, Kaniu D, Athanasios A, Bashir MR, Alvarez Gallesio J, Chavan H, Buderi S. Improving Thoracic Surgery Ward Round Quality and Enhancing Patient Safety in a Referral Centre. Cureus 2023; 15:e42784. [PMID: 37664306 PMCID: PMC10469692 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.42784] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Ward rounds are vital clinical processes that facilitate an opportunity for daily review and management of thoracic surgery inpatients. The aim of this study was to compare thoracic surgery ward round documentation against locally agreed standards and design a template to improve the detail and uniformity of this process to enhance patient care. Materials and methods Data for this audit was collected retrospectively and prospectively. Data was collected during three auditing periods and managed on Microsoft Excel. Descriptive statistics were used for its analysis. Chi-square and Fisher's Exact tests were used to test for differences in reporting rates. Results and discussion Initially, a total of 199 ward round notes were reviewed. Imaging results (19%) and discharge planning (23%) were not reported. eCARE (electronic Clinical Assessment for Round Evaluation) was developed to ensure that all aspects of patient evaluation recommended by the guidelines were included. Reporting rates significantly improved after such changes. We analysed the effect of the new ward round note on discharge planning (23.3 vs 41%, p<0.001), complication rates (32.6 vs 21.9%, p=0.03), post-surgical length of stay (LOS) (7.0 vs 5.0, p<0.001). Conclusion Over a year, we audited the Thoracic Surgery Department's ward round documentation against locally agreed standards in line with national recommendations. Several important items were not regularly reported. Using closed-ended questions improved reporting rates, and patient care was optimised. Further research should explore the impact of this new documentation method on patient care and postoperative outcomes in our Trust as well as other cardiothoracic centres.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Boyle
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, GBR
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, GBR
| | - Aina Pons
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, GBR
| | | | - Daniel Kaniu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, GBR
| | | | | | | | - Hemangi Chavan
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, GBR
| | - Silviu Buderi
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, GBR
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tokushima Y, Tago M, Tokushima M, Yamashita S, Hirakawa Y, Aihara H, Katsuki NE, Fujiwara M, Yamashita SI. Hands-on Clinical Clerkship at the Department of General Medicine in a University Hospital Improves Medical Students' Self-Evaluation of Skills of Performing Physical Examinations and Informed Consent: A Questionnaire-Based Prospective Study. Int J Gen Med 2022; 15:8647-8657. [PMID: 36568841 PMCID: PMC9785121 DOI: 10.2147/ijgm.s388798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The educational effects of a hands-on clinical clerkship on medical students at the Department of General medicine of Japanese university hospitals remain to be clarified. This study aimed to determine how such education affects medical students' self-evaluation of their clinical skills. Methods We enrolled 5th-year-grade students at the Department of General Medicine, Saga University Hospital, Japan in 2017. The students were divided into those who were going to have Japanese traditional-style observation-based training mainly in the outpatient clinic (Group O) and those in the 2018, new-style, hands-on clinical clerkship as one of the group practice members in outpatient and inpatient clinics (Group H). A questionnaire survey using the 4-point Likert scale for self-evaluation of the students' clinical skills at the beginning and the end of their training was conducted in both groups. The pre- and post-training scores of each item in both groups were compared and analyzed using the Mann-Whitney test. Results All 99 students in Group O and 121 of 123 students in Group H answered the questionnaires. The response rate was 99%. Two items regarding the abilities of "can perform a systemic physical examination quickly and efficiently" and "can clearly explain the current medical condition, therapeutic options, or risks associated with treatment, and discuss the process for obtaining informed consent" showed higher scores in the post-training survey in Group H than in Group O. There were no differences in these scores in the pre-training survey between the two groups. Conclusion A hands-on clinical clerkship at the Department of General medicine in a university hospital in Japan provided medical students with higher self-confidence in their skills of performing a physical examination and better understanding of patients' treatment options and the process of informed consent than observation-based training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshinori Tokushima
- Department of General Medicine, Saga University Hospital, Saga, Japan,Community Medical Support Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan
| | - Masaki Tago
- Department of General Medicine, Saga University Hospital, Saga, Japan,Community Medical Support Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan,Correspondence: Masaki Tago, Department of General Medicine, Saga University Hospital, 5-1-1 Nabeshima, Saga, 849-8501, Japan, Tel +81 952 34 3238, Fax +81 952 34 2029, Email
| | - Midori Tokushima
- Department of General Medicine, Saga University Hospital, Saga, Japan,Saga Medical Career Support Center, Saga University Hospital, Saga, Japan
| | - Shun Yamashita
- Department of General Medicine, Saga University Hospital, Saga, Japan
| | - Yuka Hirakawa
- Department of General Medicine, Saga University Hospital, Saga, Japan
| | - Hidetoshi Aihara
- Department of General Medicine, Saga University Hospital, Saga, Japan
| | - Naoko E Katsuki
- Department of General Medicine, Saga University Hospital, Saga, Japan
| | - Motoshi Fujiwara
- Department of General Medicine, Saga University Hospital, Saga, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mill T, Parikh S, Allen A, Dart G, Lee D, Richardson C, Howell K, Lewington A. Live streaming ward rounds using wearable technology to teach medical students: a pilot study. BMJ SIMULATION & TECHNOLOGY ENHANCED LEARNING 2021; 7:494-500. [PMID: 35520979 PMCID: PMC8154297 DOI: 10.1136/bmjstel-2021-000864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Background The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a loss of clinical clerkship opportunities for medical students. To address this problem while maintaining patient safety, this pilot study explored the feasibility of using a wearable headset to live stream teaching ward rounds to remotely based medical students. Methods Three live streamed teaching ward rounds were delivered to three groups of medical students (n=53) using the Microsoft HoloLens 2 device and Microsoft Teams software, and results pooled for analysis. Feedback was gathered from students and instructors using the evaluation of technology-enhanced learning materials (ETELM). Patient feedback was gathered using the Communication Assessment Tool to explore any impact on interpersonal communication. Results The response rate for the ETELM-learner perceptions was 58% (31/53), 100% for the ETELM-instructor perceptions. Students strongly agreed that the overall quality of the teaching session and instructors was excellent. However, 32% experienced issues with audio or video quality and one remote student reported cyber sickness. The statement 'educational activities encouraged engagement with session materials/content' returned the most varied response. Instructors reported technological problems with delivery while using the HoloLens 2 device and environmental noise in the ward was a disruptive factor. Preparation and skilled facilitation were key to delivering a high-quality teaching session. Patients reacted generally favourably to the technology and no negative effects on interpersonal communication were identified. Conclusion The experience of live streamed ward rounds was well received by patients, medical students and teaching faculty. However, there remain limitations to the routine use of HoloLens 2 technology in our setting including steep learning curves, hardware costs and environmental factors such as noise and WiFi connectivity. Live streamed ward rounds have potential postpandemic implications for the judicious use of resources, and the possibility for few educationally minded clinicians to teach at scale in a patient-friendly manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias Mill
- Medical Education Leeds, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Shefali Parikh
- Medical Education Leeds, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Archie Allen
- Medical Education Leeds, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Gemma Dart
- Medical Education Leeds, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Daniel Lee
- Medical Education Leeds, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Keith Howell
- Medical Education Leeds, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Andrew Lewington
- Medical Education Leeds, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Seguin R, Peiris L. National Variations in the Work-Up, Investigation, and Surgical Management of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast across Canadian Surgeons. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 28:1366-1375. [PMID: 33805352 PMCID: PMC8025827 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol28020130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2021] [Revised: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Variation in the management of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) of the breast occur at both national and international levels. The aim of this study is to determine the degree of, and reasons behind, this variation in the workup and treatment of DCIS among Canadian surgeons. We developed a 35-question survey involving the pre-, peri, and post-operative management of DCIS using SurveyMonkey®. The survey was sent out via email and responses were analyzed using SurveyMonkey® and Microsoft Excel. 51/119 (43%) of the Canadian General Surgeons contacted participated in this study. Some variation was observed in the utilization of pre-operative imaging with 29/48 (60%) surgeons routinely using ultrasound. Perceived contraindications to breast conserving therapy also varied with multicentricity (54%) and the presence of diffuse microcalcifications (13%). Nearly all respondent's (98%) patients had access to immediate breast reconstruction following a mastectomy but 14/48 (29%) of respondents' patients were required to travel a mean distance of 300 km to undergo the procedure. Substantial variation was also seen during follow-up with half (52%) of surgeons following up patients for >1 month in their surgical clinic. There is considerable variation in the management of DCIS among Canadian Surgeons. The present study indicates the need for pan-Canadian, evidence-based guidelines to ensure a standardized management strategy for patients with DCIS.
Collapse
|