Photodynamic therapy for mesothelioma

A real-time IR navigation system for pleural photodynamic therapy with a 3D surface acquisition system

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been used intraoperatively to treat patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. For the efficiency of PDT, it is crucial to deliver light doses uniformly. The current procedure utilizes eight light detectors placed inside the pleural cavity to monitor the light. An updated navigation system, combined with a novel scanning system, is developed to provide real-time guidance for physicians during pleural PDT to improve light delivery. The scanning system consists of two handheld three-dimensional (3D) scanners to capture the pleural cavity's surface topographies quickly and precisely before PDT so that the target surface can be identified for real-time light fluence distribution calculation during PDT. An algorithm is developed to further process the scanned volume to denoise for accurate light fluence calculation and rotate the local coordinate system into any desired direction for a clear visualization during the real-time guidance. The navigation coordinate system is registered to the patient coordinate system utilizing at least three markers to track the light source point position within the pleural cavity throughout the treatment. During PDT, the light source position, the scanned pleural cavity, and the light fluence distribution for the cavity's surface will be displayed in 3D and 2D, respectively. For validation, this novel system is tested using phantom studies with a large chest phantom and 3D-printed lung phantoms of different volumes based on a personal CT scan, immersed in a liquid tissue-simulating phantom with different optical properties, and treated with eight isotropic detectors and the navigation system.

Progress in Clinical Trials of Photodynamic Therapy for Solid Tumors and the Role of Nanomedicine

Current research to find effective anticancer treatments is being performed on photodynamic therapy (PDT) with increasing attention. PDT is a very promising therapeutic way to combine a photosensitive drug with visible light to manage different intense malignancies. PDT has several benefits, including better safety and lower toxicity in the treatment of malignant tumors over traditional cancer therapy. This reasonably simple approach utilizes three integral elements: a photosensitizer (PS), a source of light, and oxygen. Upon light irradiation of a particular wavelength, the PS generates reactive oxygen species (ROS), beginning a cascade of cellular death transformations. The positive therapeutic impact of PDT may be limited because several factors of this therapy include low solubilities of PSs, restricting their effective administration, blood circulation, and poor tumor specificity. Therefore, utilizing nanocarrier systems that modulate PS pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) is a promising approach to bypassing these challenges. In the present paper, we review the latest clinical studies and preclinical in vivo studies on the use of PDT and progress made in the use of nanotherapeutics as delivery tools for PSs to improve their cancer cellular uptake and their toxic properties and, therefore, the therapeutic impact of PDT. We also discuss the effects that photoimmunotherapy (PIT) might have on solid tumor therapeutic strategies.

Infrared navigation system for light dosimetry during pleural photodynamic therapy

Pleural photodynamic therapy (PDT) is performed intraoperatively for the treatment of microscopic disease in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. Accurate delivery of light dose is critical to PDT efficiency. As a standard of care, light fluence is delivered to the prescribed fluence using eight isotropic detectors in pre-determined discrete locations inside the pleural cavity that is filled with a dilute Intralipid solution. An optical infrared (IR) navigation system was used to monitor reflective passive markers on a modified and improved treatment delivery wand to track the position of the light source within the treatment cavity during light delivery. This information was used to calculate the light dose, incorporating a constant scattered light dose and using a dual correction method. Calculation methods were extensively compared for eight detector locations and seven patient case studies. The light fluence uniformity was also quantified by representing the unraveled three-dimensional geometry on a two-dimensional plane. Calculated light fluence at the end of treatment delivery was compared to measured values from isotropic detectors. Using a constant scattered dose for all detector locations along with a dual correction method, the difference between calculated and measured values for each detector was within 15%. Primary light dose alone does not fully account for the light delivered inside the cavity. This is useful in determining the light dose delivered to areas of the pleural cavity between detector locations, and can serve to improve treatment delivery with implementation in real-time in the surgical setting. We concluded that the standard deviation of light fluence uniformity for this method of pleural PDT is 10%.

Light Sources and Dosimetry Techniques for Photodynamic Therapy

Effective treatment delivery in photodynamic therapy (PDT) requires coordination of the light source, the photosensitizer, and the delivery device appropriate to the target tissue. Lasers, light-emitting diodes (LEDs), and lamps are the main types of light sources utilized for PDT applications. The choice of light source depends on the target location, photosensitizer used, and light dose to be delivered. Geometry of minimally accessible areas also plays a role in deciding light applicator type. Typically, optical fiber-based devices are used to deliver the treatment light close to the target. The optical properties of tissue also affect the distribution of the treatment light. Treatment light undergoes scattering and absorption in tissue. Most tissue will scatter light, but highly pigmented areas will absorb light, especially at short wavelengths. This review will summarize the basic physics of light sources, and describe methods for determining the dose delivered to the patient.

Management of Malignant Mesothelioma by Decortication and Adjunct Phototherapy

Malignant mesothelioma is a relatively rare tumor that originates in the pleural space and almost invariably results from exposure to asbestos. Between September 1989 and December 1999, 100 patients were managed with curative intent using a combination of full decortication, adjunct phototherapy after administration of hematoporphyrin derivative, and strip radiotherapy to any areas where adequate clearance was not obtained. The survival curve was compared to that of 17 matched patients treated by decortication alone. Median survival increased from 250 to 440 days in the combined treatment group.

Targeted iron-oxide nanoparticle for photodynamic therapy and imaging of head and neck cancer

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a highly specific anticancer treatment modality for various cancers, particularly for recurrent cancers that no longer respond to conventional anticancer therapies. PDT has been under development for decades, but light-associated toxicity limits its clinical applications. To reduce the toxicity of PDT, we recently developed a targeted nanoparticle (NP) platform that combines a second-generation PDT drug, Pc 4, with a cancer targeting ligand, and iron oxide (IO) NPs. Carboxyl functionalized IO NPs were first conjugated with a fibronectin-mimetic peptide (Fmp), which binds integrin β1. Then the PDT drug Pc 4 was successfully encapsulated into the ligand-conjugated IO NPs to generate Fmp-IO-Pc 4. Our study indicated that both nontargeted IO-Pc 4 and targeted Fmp-IO-Pc 4 NPs accumulated in xenograft tumors with higher concentrations than nonformulated Pc 4. As expected, both IO-Pc 4 and Fmp-IO-Pc 4 reduced the size of HNSCC xenograft tumors more effectively than free Pc 4. Using a 10-fold lower dose of Pc 4 than that reported in the literature, the targeted Fmp-IO-Pc 4 NPs demonstrated significantly greater inhibition of tumor growth than nontargeted IO-Pc 4 NPs. These results suggest that the delivery of a PDT agent Pc 4 by IO NPs can enhance treatment efficacy and reduce PDT drug dose. The targeted IO-Pc 4 NPs have great potential to serve as both a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) agent and PDT drug in the clinic.

Photodynamic therapy of cancer: an update

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a clinically approved, minimally invasive therapeutic procedure that can exert a selective cytotoxic activity toward malignant cells. The procedure involves administration of a photosensitizing agent followed by irradiation at a wavelength corresponding to an absorbance band of the sensitizer. In the presence of oxygen, a series of events lead to direct tumor cell death, damage to the microvasculature, and induction of a local inflammatory reaction. Clinical studies revealed that PDT can be curative, particularly in early stage tumors. It can prolong survival in patients with inoperable cancers and significantly improve quality of life. Minimal normal tissue toxicity, negligible systemic effects, greatly reduced long-term morbidity, lack of intrinsic or acquired resistance mechanisms, and excellent cosmetic as well as organ function-sparing effects of this treatment make it a valuable therapeutic option for combination treatments. With a number of recent technological improvements, PDT has the potential to become integrated into the mainstream of cancer treatment.

Photodynamic therapy as an adjunct to surgery or other treatments for squamous cell lung cancers

OBJECTIVES

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) was performed on 14 cases of tracheobronchial malignancies with variable tumor stages as an adjunct to surgery. We retrospectively reviewed these PDT cases to evaluate safety and oncologic outcome.

METHODS

From June 2004 to August 2010, PDT was performed in 14 cases for lung cancer. Medical records were reviewed, including demographic data, indication of the PDT, and oncologic outcomes, during the follow-up period.

RESULTS

There were 5 deaths, 1 loss of follow-up, and 5 patients that are still alive. There were 8 cases of complete response (CR), 4 cases of no response (NR), and 2 cases of partial response (PR). Among the recurrent tracheoendobronchial lesions in 5 patients, CR was accomplished in 4 patients and NR was observed in 1 patient. The mean survival of all patients was 23.9 months after PDT with a range of 6 - 66 months.

CONCLUSION

PDT demonstrates a safe and effective role as an adjunct to surgery in treating recurrent mucosal carcinoma in surgically high-risk patients. It is also effective for palliation of bronchial obstruction by cancer mass.

A review of progress in clinical photodynamic therapy

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has received increased attention since the regulatory approvals have been granted to several photosensitizing drugs and light applicators worldwide. Much progress has been seen in basic sciences and clinical photodynamics in recent years. This review will focus on new developments of clinical investigation and discuss the usefulness of various forms of PDT techniques for curative or palliative treatment of malignant and non-malignant diseases.

The present and future role of photodynamic therapy in cancer treatment

It is more than 25 years since photodynamic therapy (PDT) was proposed as a useful tool in oncology, but the approach is only now being used more widely in the clinic. The understanding of the biology of PDT has advanced, and efficient, convenient, and inexpensive systems of light delivery are now available. Results from well-controlled, randomised phase III trials are also becoming available, especially for treatment of non-melanoma skin cancer and Barrett's oesophagus, and improved photosensitising drugs are in development. PDT has several potential advantages over surgery and radiotherapy: it is comparatively non-invasive, it can be targeted accurately, repeated doses can be given without the total-dose limitations associated with radiotherapy, and the healing process results in little or no scarring. PDT can usually be done in an outpatient or day-case setting, is convenient for the patient, and has no side-effects. Two photosensitising drugs, porfirmer sodium and temoporfin, have now been approved for systemic administration, and aminolevulinic acid and methyl aminolevulinate have been approved for topical use. Here, we review current use of PDT in oncology and look at its future potential as more selective photosensitising drugs become available.

Malignant pleural mesothelioma--an update

Exposure to asbestos is the most frequent, but not exclusive, cause of malignant mesothelioma. Clinical features include dyspnea, cough, nonspecific chest pain, weight loss and night sweats. Diagnosis may be complicated by histologic difficulties. Thoracoscopic techniques are proving beneficial, but no one method of imaging has proven superior, and disease staging is inconsistent. Conventional treatments such as chemotherapy, surgery, and radiotherapy have had variable impacts, although chemotherapy is useful in palliation and can improve both survival and quality of life. There is hope for new antimetabolite agents. The role of radical surgery is yet to be evaluated in a large trial. New radiotherapeutic techniques to improve local control are promising. Multimodality treatments appear to be the most successful for management of potentially resectable disease. It is likely that biological markers will improve accuracy in staging and prognosis. With new treatments based on better understanding of the biology of the disease, there is cautious optimism for the future for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma.