The Role of Angiogenesis Inhibitors in the Era of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Targeted Therapy in Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Comparison Between Sotorasib with Docetaxel for the Treatment of Chinese Patients with Previously Treated NSCLC with KRASG12C Mutation: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis to Inform Drug Pricing

INTRODUCTION

This study sought to investigate the affordable price of sotorasib among patients with previously treated advanced KRASG12C-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) through a cost-effectiveness analysis from the perspectives of both the Chinese healthcare system and the patients.

METHODS

We developed a Markov model spanning a 20-year time horizon with a cycle length of 21 days. Our data were derived from the CodeBreaK 200 clinical trial, supplemented with published literature, publicly available national databases, and local hospitals. The primary outcomes were the affordable prices of sotorasib which would result in the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of sotorasib relative to docetaxel below the preset willing-to-pay (WTP) threshold. Sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the model's robustness.

RESULTS

At the national level, from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system and patients, the price of sotorasib should be lower than US$0.04673 and $0.03231, respectively, to make it affordable, which is equivalent to $1346 and $931 per box (120 mg × 240 pieces). At the provincial level, the price ceiling of sotorasib/mg fluctuated between $0.04084 to $0.08061 from the Chinese healthcare system's perspective and between $0.02642 to $0.06620 from the patients' perspective. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses revealed that, as the price of sotorasib decreased, its likelihood of being cost-effective increased.

CONCLUSION

Sotorasib might be a cost-effective therapy in China. The pharmaco-economic evidence generated from this study has significant implications not only for guiding the drug pricing of the upcoming sotorasib but also for determining the reimbursement ratio for its potential inclusion in the National Reimbursement Drugs List in the future.

An epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated lung adenocarcinoma patient with brain lesions resisted to osimertinib monotherapy but achieved more than 4 years of survival in osimertinib plus bevacizumab metronomic treatment

Background

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations have been identified as promising therapeutic targets for non-small cell lung cancer. Osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor-targeting drug, has good anti-tumor ability and excellent intracranial effects. However, management of osimertinib resistance is a clinical challenge. The clinical benefit of osimertinib combined with the antiangiogenic drug, bevacizumab, remains to be determined.

Case presentation

A 40-year-old female with right lung adenocarcinoma (cT2aN3M1c, IVb) was confirmed positive for EGFR exon 19 deletion mutation (c.2235_2249del, 1.3%). After receiving 5 months of osimertinib (80 mg, qd) therapy, the patient's disease progressed and she subsequently accepted treatment with osimertinib (80 mg, qd) plus bevacizumab (15 mg/kg, q21d) and achieved notable clinical remission for 23 months until renal impairment occurred, after which bevacizumab was discontinued. The patient had 6 months of remission before progression, after which bevacizumab was added again. To date, the disease has been under control. The brain lesion showed partial response again, and the side effects of bevacizumab were tolerable. The overall survival time exceeded 4 years.

Conclusion

This case report describes a treatment strategy for osimertinib-resistant patients with EGFR exon 19 deletion mutations. Metronomic treatment with osimertinib plus bevacizumab was achieved for more than 4 years.

Angiogenic signaling pathways and anti-angiogenic therapy for cancer

Angiogenesis, the formation of new blood vessels, is a complex and dynamic process regulated by various pro- and anti-angiogenic molecules, which plays a crucial role in tumor growth, invasion, and metastasis. With the advances in molecular and cellular biology, various biomolecules such as growth factors, chemokines, and adhesion factors involved in tumor angiogenesis has gradually been elucidated. Targeted therapeutic research based on these molecules has driven anti-angiogenic treatment to become a promising strategy in anti-tumor therapy. The most widely used anti-angiogenic agents include monoclonal antibodies and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway. However, the clinical benefit of this modality has still been limited due to several defects such as adverse events, acquired drug resistance, tumor recurrence, and lack of validated biomarkers, which impel further research on mechanisms of tumor angiogenesis, the development of multiple drugs and the combination therapy to figure out how to improve the therapeutic efficacy. Here, we broadly summarize various signaling pathways in tumor angiogenesis and discuss the development and current challenges of anti-angiogenic therapy. We also propose several new promising approaches to improve anti-angiogenic efficacy and provide a perspective for the development and research of anti-angiogenic therapy.

What is the Effect of Bevacizumab on Cartilage and Synovium in a Rabbit Model of Hemophilic Arthropathy?

BACKGROUND

Hemophilic arthropathy can cause recurrent hemarthroses and severe damage to the synovium and articular cartilage. Previous studies have shown that vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) plays an essential role in neoangiogenesis. Bevacizumab, a monoclonal VEGF inhibitor, is used clinically to prevent angiogenesis. However, its effects on hemophilic arthropathy are unknown.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

Using a hemophilic arthropathy rabbit model, we asked: Does an intra-articular injection of bevacizumab (1) inhibit VEGF, (2) decrease signal intensity in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) as an assessment of capillary permeability and neoangiogenesis, (3) reduce cartilage damage, (4) reduce synovial changes, and (5) affect macroscopic changes during the development of hemophilic arthropathy?

METHODS

Twenty-five male New Zealand rabbits were divided into four groups. Eight knees from four rabbits were used as the control group. We used an established animal model for hemophilic arthropathy in the remaining 21 rabbits. Animals were assigned randomly to three groups with seven rabbits in each group. One group was used to establish mild arthropathy, and the other two were used to establish severe arthropathy. Autologous blood from the rabbits' ears was injected into the right and left knees twice per week for 8 weeks to represent mild arthropathy and for 16 weeks to represent severe arthropathy. In the mild arthropathy group, bevacizumab was injected into the right knee once every 2 weeks. Bevacizumab was injected into the right knee of rabbits in one of the severe arthropathy groups once every 2 weeks for 16 weeks, and intra-articular bevacizumab injections were administered to the right knees of rabbits in the other severe arthropathy group once every 2 weeks after the eighth week. An equal volume of 0.9% saline was injected into the left knee of rabbits in all arthropathy groups. To explore the efficacy of bevacizumab, joint diameters were quantitatively measured, and cartilage and synovial changes were examined. Degeneration of articular cartilage was evaluated with the semiquantitative Osteoarthritis Research Society International grading system. Synovial damage was analyzed with a semiquantitative microscopic scoring system. In addition, we evaluated perfusion and angiogenesis using DCE-MRI (quantitative signal intensity changes). Immunohistochemical testing was used to measure VEGF levels (analyzed by Western blotting).

RESULTS

Intra-articular bevacizumab treatment inhibited VEGF in our rabbit model of hemophilic arthropathy. VEGF protein expression levels were lower in the mild arthropathy group that received intra-articular bevacizumab (0.89 ± 0.45) than the mild arthropathy control group (1.41 ± 0.61) (mean difference -0.52 [95% CI -0.898 to -0.143]; p = 0.02). VEGF levels were lower in the severe arthropathy group that received treatment for 16 weeks (0.94 ± 0.27) than in the control knees (1.49 ± 0.36) (mean difference -0.55 [95% CI -0.935 to -0.161]; p = 0.01). In the severe arthropathy group, the Osteoarthritis Research Society International score indicating cartilage damage was lower in the group that received intra-articular bevacizumab treatment from the beginning than in the control group (median 17 [range 13 to 18] versus 18 [range 17 to 20]; difference of medians 1; p = 0.02). Additionally, the scores indicated synovial damage was lower in the group that received intra-articular bevacizumab treatment from the beginning than the control group (median 5 [range 4 to 9] versus 9 [range 8 to 12]; difference of medians 4; p = 0.02). The mean of mean values for signal intensity changes was higher in the nontreated severe groups than in the group of healthy knees. The signal intensity changes were higher in the severe arthropathy control groups (Groups BC and CC) (median 311.6 [range 301.4 to 361.2] and 315.1 [range 269.7 to 460.4]) than in the mild arthropathy control group (Group AC) (median 234.1 [range 212.5 to 304.2]; difference of medians 77.5 and 81, respectively; p = 0.02 and p = 0.04, respectively). In the severe arthropathy group, discoloration caused by hemosiderin deposition in the cartilage and synovium was more pronounced than in the mild arthropathy group. In the severe arthropathy group treated with intra-articular bevacizumab, joint diameters were smaller than in the control group (Group BT median 12.7 mm [range 12.3 to 14.0] versus Group BC median 14.0 mm [range 13.1 to 14.5]; difference of medians 1.3 mm; p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Hemarthrosis damages the synovial tissues and cartilage in the knees of rabbits, regardless of whether they are treated with intra-articular bevacizumab. However, intra-articular injection of bevacizumab may reduce cartilage and synovial damage in rabbits when treatment is initiated early during the development of hemophilic arthropathy.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

If the findings in this study are replicated in larger-animal models that consider the limitations of our work, then a trial in humans might be appropriate to ascertain whether intra-articular injection of bevacizumab could reduce cartilage damage and synovial changes in patients with hemophilia whose hemarthroses cannot otherwise be controlled.

Sotorasib versus docetaxel for previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer with KRASG12C mutation: a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Sotorasib is a specific, irreversible inhibitor of the GTPase protein, KRASG12C. We compared the efficacy and safety of sotorasib with a standard-of-care treatment in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with the KRASG12C mutation who had been previously treated with other anticancer drugs.

METHODS

We conducted a randomised, open-label phase 3 trial at 148 centres in 22 countries. We recruited patients aged at least 18 years with KRASG12C-mutated advanced NSCLC, who progressed after previous platinum-based chemotherapy and a PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor. Key exclusion criteria included new or progressing untreated brain lesions or symptomatic brain lesions, previously identified oncogenic driver mutation other than KRASG12C for which an approved therapy is available (eg EGFR or ALK), previous treatment with docetaxel (neoadjuvant or adjuvant docetaxel was allowed if the tumour did not progress within 6 months after the therapy was terminated), previous treatment with a direct KRASG12C inhibitor, systemic anticancer therapy within 28 days of study day 1, and therapeutic or palliative radiation therapy within 2 weeks of treatment initiation. We randomly assigned (1:1) patients to oral sotorasib (960 mg once daily) or intravenous docetaxel (75 mg/m2 once every 3 weeks) in an open-label manner using interactive response technology. Randomisation was stratified by number of previous lines of therapy in advanced disease (1 vs 2 vs >2), ethnicity (Asian vs non-Asian), and history of CNS metastases (present or absent). Treatment continued until an independent central confirmation of disease progression, intolerance, initiation of another anticancer therapy, withdrawal of consent, or death, whichever occurred first. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, which was assessed by a blinded, independent central review in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all treated patients. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04303780, and is active but no longer recruiting.

FINDINGS

Between June 4, 2020, and April 26, 2021, 345 patients were randomly assigned to receive sotorasib (n=171 [50%]) or docetaxel (n=174 [50%]). 169 (99%) patients in the sotorasib group and 151 (87%) in the docetaxel group received at least one dose. After a median follow-up of 17·7 months (IQR 16·4-20·1), the study met its primary endpoint of a statistically significant increase in the progression-free survival for sotorasib, compared with docetaxel (median progression-free survival 5·6 months [95% CI 4·3-7·8] vs 4·5 months [3·0-5·7]; hazard ratio 0·66 [0·51-0·86]; p=0·0017). Sotorasib was well tolerated, with fewer grade 3 or worse (n=56 [33%] vs n=61 [40%]) and serious treatment-related adverse events compared with docetaxel (n=18 [11%] vs n=34 [23%]). For sotorasib, the most common treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or worse were diarrhoea (n= 20 [12%]), alanine aminotransferase increase (n=13 [8%]), and aspartate aminotransferase increase (n=9 [5%]). For docetaxel, the most common treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or worse were neutropenia (n=13 [9%]), fatigue (n=9 [6%]), and febrile neutropenia (n=8 [5%]).

INTERPRETATION

Sotorasib significantly increased progression-free survival and had a more favourable safety profile, compared with docetaxel, in patients with advanced NSCLC with the KRASG12C mutation and who had been previously treated with other anticancer drugs.

FUNDING

Amgen.

Pseudo-progression with osimertinib after definitive chemoradiation in unresectable epidermal growth factor receptor mutation positive of stage III non-small cell lung cancer: A case report

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR TKIs) have been widely used in the treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The phenomenon of pseudoprogression in targeted therapy in EGFR-mutation NSCLC patients is rare. Here, we reported an EGFR-mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma patient who was admitted to a hospital for cough and chest distress accompanied by shortness of breath. He underwent four cycles of chemotherapy with pemetrexed combined with carboplatin and concurrent radiotherapy in the third and fourth cycles. Then, he was treated by osimertinib maintenance therapy. After 11.5 months of osimertinib treatment, he was assessed to progressive disease by computed tomography. He underwent fiber bronchoscopy, and the biopsy pathology showed extensive necrosis without tumor cells. Until now, the patient has continued on osimertinib for 7 months without relapse or metastasis. As far as we know, we are the first to report pseudoprogression in osimertinib maintenance after definitive chemoradiation. This study reminds the clinicians to distinguish pseudoprogression from osimertinib-induced progression and avoid abandoning effective treatments.

[Research Progress of Angiogenesis Inhibitors Plus EGFR-TKI in EGFR-mutated Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer]

Lung cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related morbidity and mortality. Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) have become the standard treatment for EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Unfortunately, drug resistance is inevitable in most cases. EGFR-TKI combined with angiogenesis inhibitors is a treatment scheme being explored to delay the therapeutic resistance, which is called "A+T treatment". Several clinical trials have demonstrated that the A+T treatment can improve the progression free survival (PFS) of the NSCLC patients. However, compared to EGFR-TKI monotherapy, the benefits of the A+T treatment based on different EGFR-TKIs, as well as its safety and exploration prospects are still unclear. Therefore, we reviewed the literature related to all three generations EGFR-TKIs combined with angiogenesis inhibitors, and summarized the mechanism, benefit, safety, optimal target population of A+T treatment.
.

Anti-Angiogenic Therapy in ALK Rearranged Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

The management of advanced lung cancer has been transformed with the identification of targetable oncogenic driver alterations. This includes anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangements. ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) are established first-line treatment options in advanced ALK rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with several next-generation ALK TKIs (alectinib, brigatinib, ensartinib and lorlatinib) demonstrating survival benefit compared with the first-generation ALK TKI crizotinib. Still, despite high objective response rates and durable progression-free survival, drug resistance inevitably ensues, and treatment options beyond ALK TKI are predominantly limited to cytotoxic chemotherapy. Anti-angiogenic therapy targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling pathway has shown efficacy in combination with platinum-doublet chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC without a driver alteration, and with EGFR TKI in advanced EGFR mutated NSCLC. The role for anti-angiogenic therapy in ALK rearranged NSCLC, however, remains to be elucidated. This review will discuss the pre-clinical rationale, clinical trial evidence to date, and future directions to evaluate anti-angiogenic therapy in ALK rearranged NSCLC.

Non-coding RNAs in lung cancer: emerging regulators of angiogenesis

Lung cancer is the second cancer and the leading cause of tumor-related mortality worldwide. Angiogenesis is a crucial hallmark of cancer development and a promising target in lung cancer. However, the anti-angiogenic drugs currently used in the clinic do not achieve long-term efficacy and are accompanied by severe adverse reactions. Therefore, the development of novel anti-angiogenic therapeutic approaches for lung cancer is urgently needed. Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) participate in multiple biological processes in cancers, including tumor angiogenesis. Many studies have demonstrated that ncRNAs play crucial roles in tumor angiogenesis. This review discusses the regulatory functions of different ncRNAs in lung cancer angiogenesis, focusing on the downstream targets and signaling pathways regulated by these ncRNAs. Additionally, given the recent trend towards utilizing ncRNAs as cancer therapeutics, we also discuss the tremendous potential applications of ncRNAs as biomarkers or novel anti-angiogenic tools in lung cancer.

Salvage therapy of osimertinib plus anlotinib in advanced lung adenocarcinoma with leptomeningeal metastasis: A case report

Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is one of the most serious complications of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and lacks standard treatment. Patients with LM often have a poor prognosis. Here, we report a 51-year-old man diagnosed as advanced lung adenocarcinoma and gene sequencing indicated no sensitive driver gene mutation. Pemetrexed and cisplatin plus bevacizumab was administered as first-line therapy. He received pembrolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel as second-line therapy and developed neurological symptoms soon. Later, he was diagnosed LM by cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytology and gene sequencing of lung tissue rebiopsy demonstrated epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) sensitive mutation. The patient received high-dose (160mg) osimertinib therapy but still could not tolerate severe neurological symptoms and developed cardiac adverse event. After that, standard-dose (80mg) osimertinib plus anlotinib was administered and this treatment regimen resulted in the alleviation of neurological symptoms. As the recent follow up, the curative effect was evaluated stable disease (SD) and the patient gained a progression-free survival (PFS) of more than 15 months. We report this successful salvage therapy of osimertinib plus anlotinib in an advanced lung adenocarcinoma patient who developed LM after failure on previous treatment until EGFR mutation was confirmed through rebiopsy.

hsa_circ_0003222 accelerates stemness and progression of non-small cell lung cancer by sponging miR-527

The relationship between circular RNA (circRNA) and cancer stem cells (CSCs) is uncertain. We have investigated the combined influence of CSCs, circRNA (hsa_circ_0003222), and immune checkpoint inhibitors in NSCLC progression and therapy resistance. We constructed lung CSCs (LCSCs; PC9 and A549). The effects of hsa_circ_0003222 in vitro were determined by cell counting, colony and sphere formation, and Transwell assays. A tumor xenograft model of metastasis and orthotopic model were built for in vivo analysis. We found that hsa_circ_0003222 was highly expressed in NSCLC tissues and LCSCs. Higher levels of hsa_circ_0003222 were associated with the stage, metastasis, and survival rate of patients with NSCLC. Reduced levels of hsa_circ_0003222 decreased tumor cell proliferation, migration, invasion, stemness-like properties, and chemoresistance. The silencing of hsa_circ_0003222 was found to downregulate PHF21B expression and its downstream, β-catenin by relieving the sponging effect of miR-527. Moreover, silencing hsa_circ_0003222 alleviated NSCLC resistance to anti-programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-based therapy in vivo. Our data demonstrate the significant role of hsa_circ_0003222 in NSCLC cell stemness-like properties. The manipulation of circRNAs in combination with anti-PD-L1 therapy may alleviate NSCLC stemness and progression.

Third-generation EGFR inhibitor HS-10296 in combination with famitinib, a multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, exerts synergistic antitumor effects through enhanced inhibition of downstream signaling in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer cells

BACKGROUND

As a highly heterogeneous disease, lung cancer has a multitude of cellular components and patterns of gene expression which are not dependent on a single mutation or signaling pathway. Thus, using combined drugs to treat lung cancer may be a practical strategy.

METHODS

The combined antitumor effects of HS-10296, a third-generation EGFR inhibitor targeting EGFR T790M mutation, with the multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) famitinib in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were evaluated by in vitro methods such as cell proliferation, apoptosis, angiogenesis assays, and in vivo animal efficacy studies.

RESULTS

Famitinib strengthened the effects of HS-10296 on inhibiting proliferation and inducing apoptosis of NSCLC cells, possibly by synergistic inhibition of AKT and ERK phosphorylation. Meanwhile, HS-10296 significantly potentiated the effects of famitinib on inhibiting the proliferation and migration of HUVEC, which may be through synergistic inhibition of ERK phosphorylation in HUVEC, suggesting that HS-10296 may improve the inhibition of angiogenesis by famitinib. Moreover, combination of HS-10296 and famitinib exerted synergistic antitumor activity in NCI-H1975 and PC-9 xenograft models, and this effect may be accomplished by synergistic inhibition of phosphorylation of AKT and ERK and tumor angiogenesis in tumor tissues.

CONCLUSIONS

Collectively, our results indicate that HS-10296 and famitinib exhibit significant synergistic antitumor activity, suggesting that the third-generation EGFR inhibitor combined with VEGFR inhibitor provides a promising strategy in the treatment of EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

RNA-based therapies: A cog in the wheel of lung cancer defense

Lung cancer (LC) is a heterogeneous disease consisting mainly of two subtypes, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC), and remains the leading cause of death worldwide. Despite recent advances in therapies, the overall 5-year survival rate of LC remains less than 20%. The efficacy of current therapeutic approaches is compromised by inherent or acquired drug-resistance and severe off-target effects. Therefore, the identification and development of innovative and effective therapeutic approaches are critically desired for LC. The development of RNA-mediated gene inhibition technologies was a turning point in the field of RNA biology. The critical regulatory role of different RNAs in multiple cancer pathways makes them a rich source of targets and innovative tools for developing anticancer therapies. The identification of antisense sequences, short interfering RNAs (siRNAs), microRNAs (miRNAs or miRs), anti-miRs, and mRNA-based platforms holds great promise in preclinical and early clinical evaluation against LC. In the last decade, RNA-based therapies have substantially expanded and tested in clinical trials for multiple malignancies, including LC. This article describes the current understanding of various aspects of RNA-based therapeutics, including modern platforms, modifications, and combinations with chemo-/immunotherapies that have translational potential for LC therapies.

Salvianolic acid A blocks vasculogenic mimicry formation in human non-small cell lung cancer via PI3K/Akt/mTOR signalling

Vasculogenic mimicry (VM) is associated with aggressive cancer cells. Salvianolic acid A (Sal-A), an antioxidant and anti-inflammatory agent, has bioactive properties from Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge. Current investigation aspired to explore the activity of Sal-A in the VM formation of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and the mechanism underling this function. The CCK8, the scratch and boyden chemotaxis assay were presented to describe NSCLC cells viability, migration and invasion capabilities, respectively. The protein expression was verified by western blotting. In this report, Sal-A caused a reduction in viability, metastasis and capillaries structure formation of NSCLC cells. Additionally, Sal-A markedly prevented the key VM related proteins, containing EphA2, VE-cadherin and MMP2. Besides, Sal-A significantly diminished p-PI3K, p-Akt and p-mTOR level in NSCLC cells. More importantly, SC79 pretreatment reversed Sal-A inhibits NSCLC cells viability, metastasis and VM formation. These data exhibit that Sal-A could block VM network formation in NSCLC cells through modulating the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signalling pathway.

Anti-Angiogenic Therapy in the Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Angiogenesis plays an essential role in the development of most solid tumors by delivering nutrients and oxygen to the tumor. Therefore, anti-angiogenic therapy, particularly anti-VEGF and anti-VEGF receptor (VEGFR) therapy, has been a popular strategy to treat cancer. However, anti-angiogenic therapy does not significantly improve patients' outcomes when used alone because the cutdown of the vessels transforms tumor cells to a hypoxia-tolerant phenotype. While combining anti-angiogenic therapy with other therapies, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immunotherapy, and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy, has a promising efficacy due to the vessel normalization effect induced by anti-angiogenic agents. Here, we review the characteristics of tumor angiogenesis, the mechanisms, clinical applications, and prospects of combining anti-angiogenic therapy with other therapies in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.

Osimertinib combined with bevacizumab for leptomeningeal metastasis from EGFR-mutation non-small cell lung cancer: A phase II single-arm prospective clinical trial

Background

Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is associated with poor prognosis in non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of osimertinib combined with bevacizumab for LM from epidermal growth factor receptor mutation (EGFRm) NSCLC.

Methods

We conducted a phase II single‐arm prospective clinical trial of EGFRm NSCLC with LM treated with osimertinib combined with bevacizumab. LM response assessment was based on the modified RANO LM radiological criteria; CNS and extra‐CNS response was evaluated according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. The primary end points included LM progression‐free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR); the secondary end points included safety and LM overall survival (OS).

Results

A total of 14 patients were included in the study, with a median age of 61 years, and they were predominantly female (64%). EGFR mutations were reported in exons 19 del (n = 7) and 21 L858R (n = 7). When LM was diagnosed, 12 (85.7%) patients had clinical symptoms, 71.4% (10/14) of patients were diagnosed with LM by cytology, and five (35.7%) patients had a performance status (PS) score > 2. The median LM PFS was 9.3 months (95% CI: 8.2–10.4), and the LM ORR was 50%. The safety findings in the present study were consistent with the known profile of osimertinib with bevacizumab; the median LM OS was 12.6 months, and the one‐year survival rate was 35.7%.

Conclusions

Osimertinib combined with bevacizumab is an appropriate treatment option for patients with LM from EGFRm NSCLC.

Key points

Significant findings of the study

To date, there is no prospective clinical study on the treatment of osimertinib combined with bevacizumab in EGFRm NSCLC with LM.

What this study adds

The median LM PFS was 9.3 months (95% CI: 8.2–10.4), and the LM ORR was 50%, the median LM OS was 12.6 months, and the one‐year survival rate was 35.7%. Osimertinib combined with bevacizumab is an appropriate treatment option for patients with LM from EGFRm NSCLC.

Vascular toxicity associated with anti-angiogenic drugs

Over the past two decades, the treatment of cancer has been revolutionised by the highly successful introduction of novel molecular targeted therapies and immunotherapies, including small-molecule kinase inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies that target angiogenesis by inhibiting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling pathways. Despite their anti-angiogenic and anti-cancer benefits, the use of VEGF inhibitors (VEGFi) and other tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has been hampered by potent vascular toxicities especially hypertension and thromboembolism. Molecular processes underlying VEGFi-induced vascular toxicities still remain unclear but inhibition of endothelial NO synthase (eNOS), reduced nitric oxide (NO) production, oxidative stress, activation of the endothelin system, and rarefaction have been implicated. However, the pathophysiological mechanisms still remain elusive and there is an urgent need to better understand exactly how anti-angiogenic drugs cause hypertension and other cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). This is especially important because VEGFi are increasingly being used in combination with other anti-cancer dugs, such as immunotherapies (immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)), other TKIs, drugs that inhibit epigenetic processes (histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor) and poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, which may themselves induce cardiovascular injury. Here, we discuss vascular toxicities associated with TKIs, especially VEGFi, and provide an up-to-date overview on molecular mechanisms underlying VEGFi-induced vascular toxicity and cardiovascular sequelae. We also review the vascular effects of VEGFi when used in combination with other modern anti-cancer drugs.

Combination therapy with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in non-small cell lung cancer: strategies and mechanisms

Programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) blockade has been approved as the standard-of-care for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Yet, the population of patients who benefit from the treatment remains modest, some of whom would get relapsed and progressed eventually. Combination therapy has emerged as an effective way to broaden beneficiaries from PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy and overcome or delay the resistance. In this review, we discuss the PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in combination with conventional chemotherapy, targeted therapy or immunotherapy. Meanwhile, we illustrate their underlying mechanisms in regulating the process of the cancer-immunity cycle, providing the rationale for the PD-1/PD-L1 blockade-based combination therapy. The challenges of combination regimens are also addressed.

Interaction between Immunotherapy and Antiangiogenic Therapy for Cancer

Although immunotherapy has led to durable responses in diverse cancers, unfortunately, there has been limited efficacy and clinical response rates due to primary or acquired resistance to immunotherapy. To maximize the potential of immunotherapy, combination therapy with antiangiogenic drugs seems to be promising. Some phase III trials showed superiority for survival with the combination of immunotherapy and antiangiogenic therapy. In this study, we describe a synergistic mechanism of immunotherapy and antiangiogenic therapy and summarize current clinical trials of these combinations.

Anti-angiogenic Agents in Combination With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Promising Strategy for Cancer Treatment

Advances in cancer immunity have promoted a major breakthrough in the field of cancer therapy. This is mainly associated with the successful development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for multiple types of human tumors. Blockade with different ICIs, including programmed cell death 1 (PD-1), programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors, may activate the immune system of the host against malignant cells. However, only a subgroup of patients with cancer would benefit from immune checkpoint blockade. Some patients experience primary resistance to initial immunotherapy, and a majority eventually develop acquired resistance to ICIs. However, the mechanisms involved in the development of drug resistance to immune checkpoint blockade remain unclear. Recent studies supported that combination of ICIs and anti-angiogenic agents could be a promising therapeutic strategy for overcoming the low efficacy of ICIs. Moreover, through their direct anti-cancer effect by inhibiting tumor growth and metastasis, anti-angiogenic drugs reprogram the tumor milieu from an immunosuppressive to an immune permissive microenvironment. Activated immunity by immune checkpoint blockade also facilitates anti-angiogenesis by downregulating the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and alleviating hypoxia condition. Many clinical trials showed an improved anti-cancer efficacy and prolonged survival following the addition of anti-angiogenic agents to ICIs. This review summarizes the current understanding and clinical development of combination therapy with immune checkpoint blockade and anti-angiogenic strategy.

The Fire Within: NF-κB Involvement in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Thirty-four years since its discovery, NF-κB remains a transcription factor with great potential for cancer therapy. However, NF-κB-targeted therapies have yet to find a way to be clinically translatable. Here, we focus exclusively on the role of NF-κB in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and discuss its contributing effect on cancer hallmarks such as inflammation, proliferation, survival, apoptosis, angiogenesis, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, metastasis, stemness, metabolism, and therapy resistance. In addition, we present our current knowledge of the clinical significance of NF-κB and its involvement in the treatment of patients with NSCLC with chemotherapy, targeted therapies, and immunotherapy.

Angiogenesis in Breast Cancer Progression, Diagnosis, and Treatment

Angiogenesis is a significant event in a wide range of healthy and diseased conditions. This process frequently involves vasodilation and an increase in vascular permeability. Numerous players referred to as angiogenic factors, work in tandem to facilitate the outgrowth of endothelial cells (EC) and the consequent vascularity. Conversely, angiogenic factors could also feature in pathological conditions. Angiogenesis is a critical factor in the development of tumors and metastases in numerous cancers. An increased level of angiogenesis is associated with decreased survival in breast cancer patients. Therefore, a good understanding of the angiogenic mechanism holds a promise of providing effective treatments for breast cancer progression, thereby enhancing patients' survival. Disrupting the initiation and progression of this process by targeting angiogenic factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor (Vegf)-one of the most potent member of the VEGF family- or by targeting transcription factors, such as Hypoxia-Inducible Factors (HIFs) that act as angiogenic regulators, have been considered potential treatment options for several types of cancers. The objective of this review is to highlight the mechanism of angiogenesis in diseases, specifically its role in the progression of malignancy in breast cancer, as well as to highlight the undergoing research in the development of angiogenesis-targeting therapies.

New advances in antiangiogenic combination therapeutic strategies for advanced non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Tumor growth relies on the sufficient blood supply and continuously requires new blood vessels to maintain, which lead to vascular abnormalities (Folkman, N Engl J Med 285:1182-1186, 1971). Antiangiogenic therapy has emerged with the goal of normalizing vasculature and tumor microenvironment (TME). Some antiangiogenic therapies combined with chemotherapy, targeted therapy or immunotherapy have been approved for clinical application. In this review, we summarize the recent advances of antiangiogenic combination therapeutic strategies in advanced NSCLC.

METHODS

References of this review are searched through PubMed and EMBASE and the abstracts of cancer conferences. The ClinicalTrials.gov database was used for relative trials.

RESULTS

Based on different mechanisms, antiangiogenic agents can be divided into monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), which mainly include bevacizumab and ramucirumab, and multi-target antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) which include sunitinib, sorafenib, nintedanib, apatinib, anlotinib, fruquintinib, etc. In recent years, a number of large clinical studies have shown that antiangiogenic agents have conferred a significant overall survival (OS) benefit to patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). More and more evidences confirm that the combination of antiangiogenic agents with chemotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy can improve the effect and prolong the survival of NSCLC patients. However, many problems about the application of antiangiogenic agents on advanced NSCLC patients still need to be explored. For example, the combination therapy of multi-target antiangiogenic agents is just beginning, and the biomarkers are not clear.

CONCLUSIONS

Antiangiogenic agents can achieve therapeutic benefit in advanced NSCLC patients and the combination of chemotherapy, targeted therapy or immunotherapy can lead to synergistic effect. However, exploring the best combination therapy and efficacy-related biomarkers needs further study.

Nintedanib allows retreatment with atezolizumab of combined non-small cell lung cancer/idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis after atezolizumab-induced pneumonitis: a case report

Background

Nintedanib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor that efficiently slows the progression of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and has an acceptable tolerability profile. In contrast, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) such as programmed death 1 and programmed death ligand 1 inhibitors have shown clinical activity and marked efficacy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. However, it is unclear whether nintedanib reduces the risk of ICI-induced pneumonitis in IPF.

Case presentation

A 78-year-old man with squamous cell lung carcinoma in IPF underwent second-line treatment with pembrolizumab. He was diagnosed as having pembrolizumab-induced pneumonitis after two cycles. He was administered prednisolone (PSL) and then improved immediately. Thereafter, his lung cancer lesion enlarged despite treatment with TS-1. Atezolizumab was then administered as 4th-line chemotherapy, but he immediately developed atezolizumab-induced pneumonitis after 1 cycle. The re-escalated dosage of PSL improved the pneumonitis, and then nintedanib was started as additional therapy. Under careful observation with nintedanib, atezolizumab was re-administered on day 1 of an every-21-day cycle. After three cycles, it remained stable without exacerbation of drug-induced pneumonitis.

Conclusion

This case indicates the possibility that the addition of nintedanib to ICI therapy might prevent drug-induced pneumonitis or acute exacerbation of IPF. However, whether anti-fibrotic agents such as nintedanib are actually effective in preventing ICI-induced pneumonitis in ILD remains unknown and additional research is greatly needed to identify effective therapies for ILD combined with lung cancer.