Clinical Management of Women with Monogenic Diabetes During Pregnancy

Monogenic Defects of Beta Cell Function: From Clinical Suspicion to Genetic Diagnosis and Management of Rare Types of Diabetes

Monogenic defects of beta cell function refer to a group of rare disorders that are characterized by early-onset diabetes mellitus due to a single gene mutation affecting insulin secretion. It accounts for up to 5% of all pediatric diabetes cases and includes transient or permanent neonatal diabetes, maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY), and various syndromes associated with diabetes. Causative mutations have been identified in genes regulating the development or function of the pancreatic beta cells responsible for normal insulin production and/or release. To date, more than 40 monogenic diabetes subtypes have been described, with those caused by mutations in HNF1A and GCK genes being the most prevalent. Despite being caused by a single gene mutation, each type of monogenic diabetes, especially MODY, can appear with various clinical phenotypes, even among members of the same family. This clinical heterogeneity, its rarity, and the fact that it shares some features with more common types of diabetes, can make the clinical diagnosis of monogenic diabetes rather challenging. Indeed, several cases of MODY or syndromic diabetes are accurately diagnosed in adulthood, after having been mislabeled as type 1 or type 2 diabetes. The recent widespread use of more reliable sequencing techniques has improved monogenic diabetes diagnosis, which is important to guide appropriate treatment and genetic counselling. The current review aims to summarize the latest knowledge on the clinical presentation, genetic confirmation, and therapeutic approach of the various forms of monogenic defects of beta cell function, using three imaginary clinical scenarios and highlighting clinical and laboratory features that can guide the clinician in reaching the correct diagnosis.

Monogenic Diabetes: A Comprehensive Overview and Therapeutic Management of Subtypes of Mody

BACKGROUND

Monogenic diabetes often occurs as a result of single-gene mutations. The illness is minimally affected by environmental and behavioral factors, and it constitutes around one to five percent of all cases of diabetes.

METHODS

Newborn diabetes mellitus (NDM) and maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) are the predominant causes of monogenic diabetes, accounting for a larger proportion of cases, while syndromic diabetes represents a smaller percentage. MODY, a group of inherited non-autoimmune diabetes mellitus disorders, is quite common. However, it remains frequently misdiagnosed despite increasing public awareness. The condition is characterized by insulin resistance, the development of diabetes at a young age (before 25 years), mild high blood sugar levels, inheritance in an autosomal dominant pattern, and the preservation of natural insulin production.

RESULTS

Currently, there are 14 distinct subtypes of MODY that have been identified. Each subtype possesses distinct characteristics in terms of their frequency, clinical symptoms, severity of diabetes, related complications, and response to medicinal interventions. Due to the clinical similarities, lack of awareness, and high expense of genetic testing, distinguishing between type I (T1D) and type II diabetes mellitus (T2D) can be challenging, resulting in misdiagnosis of this type of diabetes. As a consequence, a significant number of individuals are being deprived of adequate medical attention. Accurate diagnosis enables the utilization of novel therapeutic strategies and enhances the management of therapy in comparison to type II and type I diabetes.

CONCLUSION

This article offers a concise overview of the clinical subtypes and characteristics of monogenic diabetes. Furthermore, this article discusses the various subtypes of MODY, as well as the process of diagnosing, managing, and treating the condition. It also addresses the difficulties encountered in detecting and treating MODY.

Management of monogenic diabetes in pregnancy: A narrative review

Pregnancy in women with monogenic diabetes is potentially complex, with significant implications for both maternal and fetal health. Among these, maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) stands out as a prevalent monogenic diabetes subtype frequently encountered in clinical practice. Each subtype of MODY requires a distinct approach tailored to the pregnancy, diverging from management strategies in non-pregnant individuals. Glucokinase MODY (GCK-MODY) typically does not require treatment outside of pregnancy, but special considerations arise when a woman with GCK-MODY becomes pregnant. The glycemic targets in GCK-MODY pregnancies are not exclusively dictated by the maternal/paternal MODY genotype but are also influenced by the genotype of the developing fetus. During pregnancy, the choice between sulfonylurea or insulin for treating hepatocyte nuclear factor 1-alpha (HNF1A)-MODY and HNF4A-MODY depends on the mother's specific circumstances and the available expertise. Management of other rarer MODY subtypes is individualized, with decisions made on a case-by-case basis. Therefore, a collaborative approach involving expert diabetes and obstetric teams is crucial for the comprehensive management of MODY pregnancies.

Genetic perspectives on childhood monogenic diabetes: Diagnosis, management, and future directions

Monogenic diabetes is caused by one or even more genetic variations, which may be uncommon yet have a significant influence and cause diabetes at an early age. Monogenic diabetes affects 1 to 5% of children, and early detection and gene-tically focused treatment of neonatal diabetes and maturity-onset diabetes of the young can significantly improve long-term health and well-being. The etiology of monogenic diabetes in childhood is primarily attributed to genetic variations affecting the regulatory genes responsible for beta-cell activity. In rare instances, mutations leading to severe insulin resistance can also result in the development of diabetes. Individuals diagnosed with specific types of monogenic diabetes, which are commonly found, can transition from insulin therapy to sulfonylureas, provided they maintain consistent regulation of their blood glucose levels. Scientists have successfully devised materials and methodologies to distinguish individuals with type 1 or 2 diabetes from those more prone to monogenic diabetes. Genetic screening with appropriate findings and interpretations is essential to establish a prognosis and to guide the choice of therapies and management of these interrelated ailments. This review aims to design a comprehensive literature summarizing genetic insights into monogenetic diabetes in children and adolescents as well as summarizing their diagnosis and mana-gement.

Genetic and Epigenetic Factors in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Pathology

Gestational diabetes (GDM) is the carbohydrate intolerance occurring during pregnancy. The risk factors of GDM include obesity, advanced maternal age, polycystic ovary syndrome, multigravidity, a sedentary lifestyle, and pre-existing hypertension. Additionally, complex genetic and epigenetic processes are also believed to play a crucial role in the development of GDM. In this narrative review, we discuss the role of genetic and epigenetic factors in gestational diabetes mellitus pathogenesis.

Maturity-onset Diabetes of the Young (MODY) in Pregnancy: A Review

Hyperglycaemia in pregnancy is one of the most common complications of pregnancy and is generally diagnosed as gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Nevertheless, clinical symptoms of hyperglycaemia in pregnancy in some cases do not match the clinical manifestations of GDM. It is suspected that 1-2 % of women diagnosed with GDM are misdiagnosed maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY). MODY often has a subclinical course; thus, it is challenging for clinicians to aptly diagnose monogenic diabetes in pregnancy. Proper diagnosis is crucial for the effective treatment of hyperglycaemia in pregnancy. Many studies revealed that misdiagnosis of MODY increases the rate of complications for both mother and fetus. This literature review reports the current knowledge regarding diagnosis, treatment, and complications of the most common types of MODY in pregnancy.

A Clinical Update on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) traditionally refers to abnormal glucose tolerance with onset or first recognition during pregnancy. GDM has long been associated with obstetric and neonatal complications primarily relating to higher infant birthweight and is increasingly recognized as a risk factor for future maternal and offspring cardiometabolic disease. The prevalence of GDM continues to rise internationally due to epidemiological factors including the increase in background rates of obesity in women of reproductive age and rising maternal age and the implementation of the revised International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups' criteria and diagnostic procedures for GDM. The current lack of international consensus for the diagnosis of GDM reflects its complex historical evolution and pragmatic antenatal resource considerations given GDM is now 1 of the most common complications of pregnancy. Regardless, the contemporary clinical approach to GDM should be informed not only by its short-term complications but also by its longer term prognosis. Recent data demonstrate the effect of early in utero exposure to maternal hyperglycemia, with evidence for fetal overgrowth present prior to the traditional diagnosis of GDM from 24 weeks' gestation, as well as the durable adverse impact of maternal hyperglycemia on child and adolescent metabolism. The major contribution of GDM to the global epidemic of intergenerational cardiometabolic disease highlights the importance of identifying GDM as an early risk factor for type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease, broadening the prevailing clinical approach to address longer term maternal and offspring complications following a diagnosis of GDM.

Report of Prolonged Neonatal Hypoglycemia in Three Infants of Mothers With Variants in HNF1A

Background/Objective

Genetic variants in hepatic nuclear factor 1α (HNF1A) cause maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY). We sought to examine whether HNF1A MODY variants also cause neonatal hypoglycemia.

Case Report

We present 3 infants with variants in HNF1A shared with their mothers. The infants experienced neonatal hypoglycemia, 2 extending beyond 1 year and the third resolving by 28 days, and all were large for gestational age (birth weights of >99th percentile). In 2 cases, genetic testing for neonatal hypoglycemia revealed pathogenic variants in HNF1A; 1 mother was previously diagnosed with HNF1A MODY, and the other's genetic testing and ultimate MODY diagnosis were prompted by her child's hypoglycemia workup. In the third case, the infant's persistent hypoglycemia prompted genetic testing, revealing an HNF1A variant of uncertain significance, which was then identified in the mother.

Discussion

Genetic variants causing HNF1A MODY have not been definitively linked to neonatal hypoglycemia or fetal overgrowth in utero. MODY caused by HNF1A is clinically similar to that caused by HNF4A, for which a causal relationship with neonatal hypoglycemia is more certain. Case reports have previously implicated variants in HNF1A in congenital hyperinsulinism; however, these cases have generally not been in families with MODY. The cases presented here suggest that HNF1A variants causing MODY may also cause neonatal hypoglycemia.

Conclusion

Although confounding factors make the assessment of neonatal hypoglycemia challenging, these cases offer potential support for single genetic variants in HNF1A causing both MODY and neonatal hypoglycemia, with associated fetal overgrowth in utero.

The Challenges of Treating Glucokinase MODY during Pregnancy: A Review of Maternal and Fetal Outcomes

Background: The optimal treatment strategy for the follow-up and management of women with glucokinase maturity-onset diabetes of the young (GCK−MODY)during pregnancy remains unknown. Data regarding maternal and fetal outcomes are lacking. Aim: This paper summarizes the existing literature regarding the maternal and fetal outcomes of women with glucokinase MODY to guide future treatment strategy. Methods: A literature search was conducted in Pubmed, Embace, and Cochrane library with citation follow-up using the terms: glucokinase, MODY, diabetes, pregnancy, gestation, and outcomes. We searched for articles with known fetal mutational status. Relevant outcomes included: birthweight, large for gestational age (LGA), small for gestational age (SGA), macrosomia, cesarean delivery (CD), shoulder dystocia, congenital anomalies, miscarriages, preterm births, and long-term outcomes. Results: Fourteen relevant manuscripts were identified describing maternal and fetal outcomes. The percentage of LGA and macrosomia in 102 glucokinase -unaffected offspring (GCK−) was significantly higher than in the glucokinase -affected offspring (GCK+) (44% vs. 10%, p < 0.001 and 22% vs. 2%, p < 0.001, respectively). Among the 173 GCK(+) offspring, only 5% were SGA, which can be expected according to the normal distribution. We observed higher rates of CD and shoulder dystocia in the GCK(−) offspring. Conclusions: GCK(−) offspring have significantly higher birthweights and more birth complications. The optimal treatment strategy to guide management should take into consideration multiple variables other than fetal mutational status.

Improvements in Awareness and Testing Have Led to a Threefold Increase Over 10 Years in the Identification of Monogenic Diabetes in the U.K

OBJECTIVE

Maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) is a rare monogenic form of diabetes. In 2009, >80% of U.K. cases were estimated to be misdiagnosed. Since then, there have been a number of initiatives to improve the awareness and detection of MODY, including education initiatives (Genetic Diabetes Nurse [GDN] project), the MODY probability calculator, and targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS). We examined how the estimated prevalence of MODY and other forms of monogenic diabetes diagnosed outside the neonatal period has changed over time and how the initiatives have impacted case finding.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

U.K. referrals for genetic testing for monogenic diabetes diagnosed >1 year of age from 1 January 1996 to 31 December 2019 were examined. Positive test rates were compared for referrals reporting GDN involvement/MODY calculator use with those that did not.

RESULTS

A diagnosis of monogenic diabetes was confirmed in 3,860 individuals, more than threefold higher than 2009 (1 January 1996 to 28 February 2009, n = 1,177). Median age at diagnosis in probands was 21 years. GDN involvement was reported in 21% of referrals; these referrals had a higher positive test rate than those without GDN involvement (32% vs. 23%, P < 0.001). MODY calculator usage was indicated in 74% of eligible referrals since 2014; these referrals had a higher positive test rate than those not using the calculator (33% vs. 25%, P = 0.001). Four hundred ten (10.6%) cases were identified through tNGS. Monogenic diabetes prevalence was estimated to be 248 cases/million (double that estimated in 2009 because of increased case finding).

CONCLUSIONS

Since 2009, referral rates and case diagnosis have increased threefold. This is likely to be the consequence of tNGS, GDN education, and use of the MODY calculator.

Precision medicine in diabetes: A non-invasive prenatal diagnostic test for the determination of fetal glucokinase mutations

Hyperglycemia caused by mutations in the glucokinase gene, GCK, is the most common form of monogenic diabetes. Prenatal diagnosis is important, as it impacts on treatment. This study reports a monogenic non-invasive prenatal diagnostic (NIPD-M) test on cell-free DNA in maternal plasma using the relative haplotype dosage. In three pregnancies of two families with known maternal GCK mutations, the fetal genotype was determined unambiguously already at 12 weeks of gestation. In summary, proof is provided of the feasibility for NIPD-M in GCK diabetes.

Role of Actionable Genes in Pursuing a True Approach of Precision Medicine in Monogenic Diabetes

Monogenic diabetes is a genetic disorder caused by one or more variations in a single gene. It encompasses a broad spectrum of heterogeneous conditions, including neonatal diabetes, maturity onset diabetes of the young (MODY) and syndromic diabetes, affecting 1-5% of patients with diabetes. Some of these variants are harbored by genes whose altered function can be tackled by specific actions ("actionable genes"). In suspected patients, molecular diagnosis allows the implementation of effective approaches of precision medicine so as to allow individual interventions aimed to prevent, mitigate or delay clinical outcomes. This review will almost exclusively concentrate on the clinical strategy that can be specifically pursued in carriers of mutations in "actionable genes", including ABCC8, KCNJ11, GCK, HNF1A, HNF4A, HNF1B, PPARG, GATA4 and GATA6. For each of them we will provide a short background on what is known about gene function and dysfunction. Then, we will discuss how the identification of their mutations in individuals with this form of diabetes, can be used in daily clinical practice to implement specific monitoring and treatments. We hope this article will help clinical diabetologists carefully consider who of their patients deserves timely genetic testing for monogenic diabetes.

Sequencing Cell-free Fetal DNA in Pregnant Women With GCK-MODY

CONTEXT

Individuals with monogenic diabetes due to inactivating glucokinase (GCK) variants typically do not require treatment, except potentially during pregnancy. In pregnancy, fetal GCK genotype determines whether treatment is indicated, but noninvasive methods are not clinically available.

OBJECTIVE

This work aims to develop a method to determine fetal GCK genotype noninvasively using maternal cell-free fetal DNA.

METHODS

This was a proof-of-concept study involving 3 pregnant women with a causal GCK variant that used information from 1) massive parallel sequencing of maternal plasma cell-free DNA, 2) direct haplotype sequences of maternal genomic DNA, and 3) the paternal genotypes to estimate relative haplotype dosage of the pathogenic variant-linked haplotype. Statistical testing of variant inheritance was performed using a sequential probability ratio test (SPRT).

RESULTS

In each of the 3 cases, plasma cell-free DNA was extracted once between gestational weeks 24 and 36. The fetal fraction of cell-free DNA ranged from 21.8% to 23.0%. Paternal homozygous alleles that were identical to the maternal GCK variant-linked allele were not overrepresented in the cell-free DNA. Paternal homozygous alleles that were identical to the maternal wild-type-linked allele were significantly overrepresented. Based on the SPRT, we predicted that all 3 cases did not inherit the GCK variant. Postnatal infant genotyping confirmed our prediction in each case.

CONCLUSION

We have successfully implemented a noninvasive method to predict fetal GCK genotype using cell-free DNA in 3 pregnant women carrying an inactivating GCK variant. This method could guide tailoring of hyperglycemia treatment in pregnancies of women with GCK monogenic diabetes.

Treatment implications of a delayed diagnosis of maturity-onset diabetes of the young

Maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) is a rare form of monogeneic diabetes that classically presents as non-insulin requiring diabetes with evidence of autosomal dominant inheritance in individuals who are typically young and lean. However, these criteria do not capture all cases and can also overlap with other types of diabetes. The hepatocyte nuclear factor-1 alpha (HNF1A) mutation is a common cause of MODY and is highly sensitive to sulphonylureas, which should be first-line therapy. Our case represents the diagnostic challenges of HNF1A MODY and the implications of a delayed diagnosis, which can lead to reduced success of sulphonylurea treatment.

Classification of diabetes. World Health Organization 2019. What’s new?

The review focuses on the new WHO classification published in 2019. Unlike the previous classification, this classification does not recognize subtypes of T1DM and T2DM and offers new types of diabetes: “hybrid types of diabetes” and “unclassified diabetes”. This classification provides practical guidance to clinicians for assigning a type of diabetes to individuals and choose appropriate treatment (whether or not to start treatment with insulin), particularly at the time of diagnosis. This review presents the variety of forms of diabetes, the features of their clinical picture, and also emphasizes the importance of molecular genetic and immunological studies to identify types of diabetes and determine personalized therapy. The selection of “hybrid forms” of diabetes is due to the fact that the treatment of these types of diabetes has its own characteristics associated with the specific pathogenesis of diseases. However, it is obvious that further studies should relate to the study of the mechanisms of damage and decrease in the function of в-cells. Perhaps future classification systems and, as a consequence, personalized treatment will focus on various mechanisms of damage to β-cells.

Monogenic Diabetes: From Genetic Insights to Population-Based Precision in Care. Reflections From a Diabetes Care Editors' Expert Forum

Individualization of therapy based on a person's specific type of diabetes is one key element of a "precision medicine" approach to diabetes care. However, applying such an approach remains difficult because of barriers such as disease heterogeneity, difficulties in accurately diagnosing different types of diabetes, multiple genetic influences, incomplete understanding of pathophysiology, limitations of current therapies, and environmental, social, and psychological factors. Monogenic diabetes, for which single gene mutations are causal, is the category most suited to a precision approach. The pathophysiological mechanisms of monogenic diabetes are understood better than those of any other form of diabetes. Thus, this category offers the advantage of accurate diagnosis of nonoverlapping etiological subgroups for which specific interventions can be applied. Although representing a small proportion of all diabetes cases, monogenic forms present an opportunity to demonstrate the feasibility of precision medicine strategies. In June 2019, the editors of Diabetes Care convened a panel of experts to discuss this opportunity. This article summarizes the major themes that arose at that forum. It presents an overview of the common causes of monogenic diabetes, describes some challenges in identifying and treating these disorders, and reports experience with various approaches to screening, diagnosis, and management. This article complements a larger American Diabetes Association effort supporting implementation of precision medicine for monogenic diabetes, which could serve as a platform for a broader initiative to apply more precise tactics to treating the more common forms of diabetes.

The epidemiology, molecular pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY)

Background

The most common type of monogenic diabetes is maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY), a clinically and genetically heterogeneous group of endocrine disorders that affect 1–5% of all patients with diabetes mellitus. MODY is characterized by autosomal dominant inheritance but de novo mutations have been reported. Clinical features of MODY include young-onset hyperglycemia, evidence of residual pancreatic function, and lack of beta cell autoimmunity or insulin resistance. Glucose-lowering medications are the main treatment options for MODY. The growing recognition of the clinical and public health significance of MODY by clinicians, researchers, and governments may lead to improved screening and diagnostic practices. Consequently, this review article aims to discuss the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of MODY based on relevant literature published from 1975 to 2020.

Main body

The estimated prevalence of MODY from European cohorts is 1 per 10,000 in adults and 1 per 23,000 in children. Since little is known about the prevalence of MODY in African, Asian, South American, and Middle Eastern populations, further research in non-European cohorts is needed to help elucidate MODY’s exact prevalence. Currently, 14 distinct subtypes of MODY can be diagnosed through clinical assessment and genetic analysis. Various genetic mutations and disease mechanisms contribute to the pathogenesis of MODY. Management of MODY is subtype-specific and includes diet, oral antidiabetic drugs, or insulin.

Conclusions

Incidence and prevalence estimates for MODY are derived from epidemiologic studies of young people with diabetes who live in Europe, Australia, and North America. Mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of MODY include defective transcriptional regulation, abnormal metabolic enzymes, protein misfolding, dysfunctional ion channels, or impaired signal transduction. Clinicians should understand the epidemiology and pathogenesis of MODY because such knowledge is crucial for accurate diagnosis, individualized patient management, and screening of family members.

Regulation of maternal-fetal metabolic communication

Pregnancy may be the most nutritionally sensitive stage in the life cycle, and improved metabolic health during gestation and early postnatal life can reduce the risk of chronic disease in adulthood. Successful pregnancy requires coordinated metabolic, hormonal, and immunological communication. In this review, maternal-fetal metabolic communication is defined as the bidirectional communication of nutritional status and metabolic demand by various modes including circulating metabolites, endocrine molecules, and other secreted factors. Emphasis is placed on metabolites as a means of maternal-fetal communication by synthesizing findings from studies in humans, non-human primates, domestic animals, rabbits, and rodents. In this review, fetal, placental, and maternal metabolic adaptations are discussed in turn. (1) Fetal macronutrient needs are summarized in terms of the physiological adaptations in place to ensure their proper allocation. (2) Placental metabolite transport and maternal physiological adaptations during gestation, including changes in energy budget, are also discussed. (3) Maternal nutrient limitation and metabolic disorders of pregnancy serve as case studies of the dynamic nature of maternal-fetal metabolic communication. The review concludes with a summary of recent research efforts to identify metabolites, endocrine molecules, and other secreted factors that mediate this communication, with particular emphasis on serum/plasma metabolomics in humans, non-human primates, and rodents. A better understanding of maternal-fetal metabolic communication in health and disease may reveal novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets for metabolic disorders of pregnancy.

The clinical consequences of heterogeneity within and between different diabetes types

Advances in molecular methods and the ability to share large population-based datasets are uncovering heterogeneity within diabetes types, and some commonalities between types. Within type 1 diabetes, endotypes have been discovered based on demographic (e.g. age at diagnosis, race/ethnicity), genetic, immunological, histopathological, metabolic and/or clinical course characteristics, with implications for disease prediction, prevention, diagnosis and treatment. In type 2 diabetes, the relative contributions of insulin resistance and beta cell dysfunction are heterogeneous and relate to demographics, genetics and clinical characteristics, with substantial interaction from environmental exposures. Investigators have proposed approaches that vary from simple to complex in combining these data to identify type 2 diabetes clusters relevant to prognosis and treatment. Advances in pharmacogenetics and pharmacodynamics are also improving treatment. Monogenic diabetes is a prime example of how understanding heterogeneity within diabetes types can lead to precision medicine, since phenotype and treatment are affected by which gene is mutated. Heterogeneity also blurs the classic distinctions between diabetes types, and has led to the definition of additional categories, such as latent autoimmune diabetes in adults, type 1.5 diabetes and ketosis-prone diabetes. Furthermore, monogenic diabetes shares many features with type 1 and type 2 diabetes, which make diagnosis difficult. These challenges to the current classification framework in adult and paediatric diabetes require new approaches. The 'palette model' and the 'threshold hypothesis' can be combined to help explain the heterogeneity within and between diabetes types. Leveraging such approaches for therapeutic benefit will be an important next step for precision medicine in diabetes. Graphical abstract.

Maternal or Paternal Diabetes and Its Crucial Role in Offspring Birth Weight and MODY Diagnosis

Maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) represents a heterogenous group of monogenic autosomal dominant diseases, which accounts for 1-2% of all diabetes cases. Pregnancy represents a crucial time to diagnose MODY forms due to the 50% risk of inheritance in offspring of affected subjects and the potential implications on adequate fetal weight. Not only a history of maternal diabetes may affect the birth weight of offspring, paternal diabetes should also be taken into consideration for a correct pathogenetic diagnosis. The crucial role of maternal and paternal diabetes inheritance patterns and the impact of this inherited mutation on birthweight and the MODY diagnosis was discussed.

Identification of MODY among patients screened for gestational diabetes: a clinician's guide

PURPOSE

Screening of gestational diabetes/GDM (although different in different countries) represents a standard procedure allowing to identify women with pregnancy-associated diabetes. Some of the women with GDM (up to 5%) may, however, suffer from previously undiagnosed MODY (Maturity-Onset Diabetes of the Young). Currently, no international or local guidelines focused on the identification of MODY among GDM exist. Thus, the aim of this manuscript is to propose a clear guide for clinicians on how to detect MODY among pregnant women with gestational diabetes.

METHODS

Based on the available literature about diagnosis (in general population) of MODY and management of MODY (both, in general population and in pregnant women), we propose a clear clinical guide on how to diagnose and manage MODY in pregnancy.

RESULTS

The manuscript suggests a feasible clinical approach how to recognize MODY among patients with GDM and how to manage pregnancy of women with three most common MODY subtypes.

CONCLUSION

A correct classification of diabetes is, nonetheless, essential, particularly in case of MODY, as the management of pregnant women with MODY is different and the correct diagnosis of MODY enables individualized treatment with regard to optimal pregnancy outcomes.

Uncommon Presentations of Diabetes: Zebras in the Herd

The majority of patients with diabetes are diagnosed as having either type 1 or type 2 diabetes. However, when encountered in clinical practice, some patients may not match the classic diagnostic criteria or expected clinical presentation for either type of the disease. Latent autoimmune, ketosis-prone, and monogenic diabetes are nonclassical forms of diabetes that are often misdiagnosed as either type 1 or type 2 diabetes. Recognizing the distinguishing clinical characteristics and understanding the diagnostic criteria for each will lead to appropriate treatment, facilitate personalized medicine, and improve patient outcomes.

MODY2 diagnostic issues in adults

Approximately 90% of all cases of diabetes mellitus in adults involve type 2 diabetes, while the prevalence of maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) remains undetermined leading to inappropriate treatment regimens. One of the most common monogenic forms of diabetes is a disease caused by a mutation in the glucokinase gene, MODY2. Knowledge of the clinical features of the disease allows the selection of patients with a high risk of mutation in the glucokinase gene and verification of diagnosis for molecular genetic research. This paper reflects the clinical features of MODY2 and the difficulties of diagnosis in adults. Furthermore, it presents a clinical case of a patient with MODY2 demonstrating all the features of this type of diabetes. A family member with a mutation in the gene allows to predict the nature of carbohydrate metabolism disorders in first degree relatives. A targeted study of only one part of the glucokinase gene in molecular genetic research is sufficient to confirm the diagnosis in relatives.

Management and Outcomes of Maturity-Onset Diabetes of the Young in Pregnancy

Maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) is a group of monogenic disorders that accounts for 1% to 5% of diabetes. The most common mutations are those in the hepatocyte nuclear factor-1-alpha (HNF-1-alpha) and in the glucokinase (GCK) genes. Although management of MODY is well established, no guidelines currently exist for management during pregnancy. Both maternal glycemic control and fetal mutation status are factors that may influence outcomes during pregnancy. The primary aim of this project was to describe cases of MODY during pregnancy to highlight the clinical implications of management of this disorder during pregnancy. The Ottawa Hospital is the primary referral centre for high-risk obstetrical patients, including those with diabetes in pregnancy, in Ottawa, Canada. Referrals between 2008 and 2018 were reviewed and a case series of three women and five pregnancies is described. Together with the illustrative cases, a literature review of MODY in pregnancy is used to highlight clinical considerations unique to MODY in pregnancy. We describe 5 pregnancies with MODY-2 (GCK mutation) and MODY 3 (HNF-1-alpha mutation). Important issues identified included monitoring of fetal growth and individualization of maternal glycemic control, particularly in cases where fetal mutation status is unknown. Management of MODY in pregnancy is challenging and there is little evidence to guide recommendations. Fetal growth can be used to guide management of maternal glycemic targets when fetal mutation status is unknown.

Copy Number Variation in GCK in Patients With Maturity-Onset Diabetes of the Young

PURPOSE

Next generation sequencing (NGS) methods to diagnose maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY), a monogenic autosomal dominant cause of diabetes, do not typically detect large-scale copy number variations (CNVs). New techniques may allow assessment for CNVs using output data from targeted NGS, without requiring additional sequencing. Using this technique, two kindreds of patients presenting with features of MODY were found to bear the same heterozygous large-scale deletion in GCK.

METHODS

Patients suspected of having MODY but with negative targeted NGS pathogenic variant calling were reanalyzed using the CNV caller tool (VarSeq v1.4.3). Two patients were identified as having a possible heterozygous whole exon deletion affecting exon 1 of GCK. For confirmation and determination of the exact breakpoints, whole exome sequencing followed by Sanger sequencing were used. Familial samples from both affected and nonaffected first-degree relatives were then analyzed for each proband.

RESULTS

A heterozygous whole-exon deletion spanning 4763 bp affecting the entire exon 1 of GCK was detected in two apparently unrelated patients with clinical features of MODY. This deletion showed segregation concordance across generations in affected and nonaffected family members.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings confirm the utility of applying the CNV caller tool to screen for CNVs in GCK from NGS data. In so doing, we identified a deletion of exon 1 of GCK as likely causal for MODY. Our data indicate that incorporating CNV analysis routinely when assessing for MODY via targeted NGS may increase diagnostic yield and reduce false negative genetic testing rates.

GCK-MODY in the US Monogenic Diabetes Registry: Description of 27 unpublished variants

We report on 134 unique GCK variants in 217 families, including 27 unpublished variants, identified in the US Monogenic Diabetes Registry in the last decade. Using ACMG guidelines, 26% were pathogenic, 56% likely pathogenic and 18% were of uncertain significance. Those with pathogenic variants had clinical features consistent with GCK-MODY.

Identification of an HNF1A p.Gly292fs Frameshift Mutation Presenting as Diabetes During Pregnancy in a Maltese Family

The diagnosis of maturity onset diabetes of the young (MODY) is a challenging process in view of the extensive clinical and genetic heterogeneity of the disease. Mutations in the gene encoding hepatocyte nuclear factor 1α (HNF1A) are responsible for most forms of monogenic diabetes in Northern European populations. Genetic analysis through a combination of whole exome sequencing and Sanger sequencing in three Maltese siblings and their father identified a rare duplication/frameshift mutation in exon 4 of HNF1A that lies within a known mutational hotspot in this gene. In this report, we provide the first description of an HNF1A-MODY3 phenotype in a Maltese family. The findings reported are relevant and new to a regional population, where the epidemiology of atypical diabetes has never been studied before. This report is of clinical interest as it highlights how monogenic diabetes can be misdiagnosed as either type 1, type 2, or gestational diabetes. It also reinforces the need for a better characterisation of monogenic diabetes in Mediterranean countries, particularly in island populations such as Malta with a high prevalence of diabetes.

Monogenic Forms of Diabetes Mellitus

In addition to the common types of diabetes mellitus, two major monogenic diabetes forms exist. Maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) represents a heterogenous group of monogenic, autosomal dominant diseases. MODY accounts for 1-2% of all diabetes cases, and it is not just underdiagnosed but often misdiagnosed to type 1 or type 2 diabetes. More than a dozen MODY genes have been identified to date, and their molecular classification is of great importance in the correct treatment decision and in the judgment of the prognosis. The most prevalent subtypes are HNF1A, GCK, and HNF4A. Genetic testing for MODY has changed recently due to the technological advancements, as contrary to the sequential testing performed in the past, nowadays all MODY genes can be tested simultaneously by next-generation sequencing. The other major group of monogenic diabetes is neonatal diabetes mellitus which can be transient or permanent, and often the diabetes is a part of a syndrome. It is a severe monogenic disease appearing in the first 6 months of life. The hyperglycemia usually requires insulin. There are two forms, permanent neonatal diabetes mellitus (PNDM) and transient neonatal diabetes mellitus (TNDM). In TNDM, the diabetes usually reverts within several months but might relapse later in life. The incidence of NDM is 1:100,000-1:400,000 live births, and PNDM accounts for half of the cases. Most commonly, neonatal diabetes is caused by mutations in KCNJ11 and ABCC8 genes encoding the ATP-dependent potassium channel of the β cell. Neonatal diabetes has experienced a quick and successful transition into the clinical practice since the discovery of the molecular background. In case of both genetic diabetes groups, recent guidelines recommend genetic testing.

Monogenic diabetes: the impact of making the right diagnosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Monogenic forms of diabetes have received increased attention and genetic testing is more widely available; however, many patients are still misdiagnosed as having type 1 (T1D) or type 2 diabetes. This review will address updates to monogenic diabetes prevalence, identification, treatment, and genetic testing.

RECENT FINDINGS

The creation of a T1D genetic risk score and the use of noninvasive urinary C-peptide creatinine ratios have provided new tools to aid in the discrimination of possible monogenic diabetes from likely T1D. Early, high-dose sulfonylurea treatment in infants with a KCNJ11 or ABCC8 mutation continues to be well tolerated and effective. As the field moves towards more comprehensive genetic testing methods, there is an increased opportunity to identify novel genetic causes. Genetic testing results continue to allow for personalized treatment but should provide patient information at an appropriate health literacy level.

SUMMARY

Although there have been clinical and genetic advances in monogenic diabetes, patients are still misdiagnosed. Improved insurance coverage of genetic testing is needed. The majority of data on monogenic diabetes has been collected from Caucasian populations, therefore, research studies should endeavor to include broader ethnic and racial diversity to provide comprehensive information for all populations.

Monogenic Diabetes in Children and Adolescents: Recognition and Treatment Options

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We provide a review of monogenic diabetes in young children and adolescents with a focus on recognition, management, and pharmacological treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

Monogenic forms of diabetes account for approximately 1-2% of diabetes in children and adolescents, and its incidence has increased in recent years due to greater awareness and wider availability of genetic testing. Monogenic diabetes is due to single gene defects that primarily affect beta cell function with more than 30 different genes reported. Children with antibody-negative, C-peptide-positive diabetes should be evaluated and genetically tested for monogenic diabetes. Accurate genetic diagnosis impacts treatment in the most common types of monogenic diabetes, including the use of sulfonylureas in place of insulin or other glucose-lowering agents or discontinuing pharmacologic treatment altogether. Diagnosis of monogenic diabetes can significantly improve patient care by enabling prediction of the disease course and guiding appropriate management and treatment.