Hiatus Hernia as a Cause of Dysphagia

Comprehensive Assessment of Esophageal Disorders Associated with Hiatus Hernia: Insights from Big Data Analysis

Hiatus hernia (HH) is a prevalent endoscopic finding in clinical practice, frequently co-occurring with esophageal disorders, yet the prevalence and degree of association remain uncertain. We aim to investigate HH's frequency and its suspected association with esophageal disorders. We reviewed endoscopic reports of over 75,000 consecutive patients who underwent gastroscopy over 12 years in two referral centers. HH was endoscopically diagnosed. We derived data on clinical presentation and a comprehensive assessment of benign and malignant esophageal pathologies. We performed multiple regression models to identify esophageal sequela associated with HH. The overall frequency of HH was (16.8%); the majority (89.5%) had small HHs (<3 cm). Female predominance was documented in HH patients, who were significantly older than controls (61.1±16.5 vs. 52.7±20.0; P < 0.001). The outcome analysis of esophageal pathology revealed an independent association between HH, regardless of its size, and erosive reflux esophagitis (25.7% vs. 6.2%; OR = 3.8; P < 0.001) and Barrett's esophagus (3.8% vs. 0.7%; OR = 4.7, P < 0.001). Furthermore, following rigorous age and sex matching, in conjunction with additional multivariable analyses, large HHs were associated with higher rates of benign esophageal strictures (3.6% vs. 0.3%; P < 0.001), Mallory Weiss syndrome (3.6% vs. 2.1%; P = 0.01), and incidents of food impactions (0.9% vs. 0.2%; P = 0.014). In contrast, a lower rate of achalasia was noted among this cohort (0.55% vs. 0%; P = 0.046). Besides reflux-related esophageal disorders, we outlined an association with multiple benign esophageal disorders, particularly in patients with large HHs.

Achalasia and Hiatal Hernia: A Rare Association and a Therapeutic Challenge

Background/Aims

Achalasia and hiatal hernia are rarely associated. The aim of the current study is to explore the clinical and manometric findings in patients with achalasia and hiatal hernia, and to determine if the presence of a hiatal hernia should influence therapeutic management in patients with achalasia.

Methods

This retrospective single center analysis included a group of patients with achalasia and hiatal hernia (study group) and a group of matched patients with achalasia but no hiatal hernia (control group). We recorded demographic, clinical, endoscopic, and manometric parameters and compared initial presentation and treatment outcomes between the groups.

Results

Between 2015 and 2022, achalasia was diagnosed in 294/1513 (19.4%) patients. Concomitant hiatal hernia was identified in 13/294 (4.4%) patients. Compared to patients with achalasia and no hiatal hernia, patients in the study group had lower Eckardt scores at baseline (5.4 ± 2.0 vs 7.8 ± 2.4; P = 0.005) but similar integrated relaxation pressure. Following treatment, patients in the study and control group had similar clinical success and prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms.

Conclusions

Hiatal hernia is rarely associated with achalasia. The presence of a hiatal hernia should not influence treatment decisions in patients with achalasia.

Poor Metabolic Profile Is an Independent Risk Factor for Recurrence After Hiatal Hernia Repair When Using Tension-Free Mesh

Purpose: The effect of metabolic risk factors on the recurrence rate of hiatal hernia (HH) after the initial repair is still controversial. In this study, we evaluated whether a poor preoperative metabolic profile is a risk factor for the recurrence of a HH after surgery. Methods: Perioperative patient data were obtained from hospital records. A poor metabolic profile was defined as having two or more metabolic conditions such as diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, or being overweight. The recurrence rates of HH were measured at 6 months, and again at 12 months after surgery. Results: Data were collected from a total of 221 patients. While 87 (39.4%) patients underwent tension-free mesh (TFM) repair, 137 (60.6%) were treated with suture repair. The poor metabolic profile has no effect on the recurrence rates in the suture-repair group. However, patients who underwent TFM repair displayed a significantly higher recurrence rate at the 12-month time point if they had poor metabolic profile, compared to the healthy group (respectively, 20.7% and 3.4%, P < .01). The logistic regression analysis showed that having a poor metabolic profile was an independent risk factor for recurrence after 12 months in the same group (odds ratio: 8.04 confidence interval [CI: 1.2-53.5] P = .03). Conclusion: The poor metabolic profile was found to be responsible for high recurrence rates only in patients who underwent TFM HH repair.

Evaluation of post-operative dysphagia following anti-reflux surgery

BACKGROUND

Anti-reflux surgery (ARS) has known long-term complications, including dysphagia, bloat, and flatulence, among others. The factors affecting the development of post-operative dysphagia are poorly understood. We investigated the correlation of intra-operative esophagogastric junction (EGJ) characteristics and procedure type with post-operative dysphagia following ARS.

METHODS

Robotic ARS was performed on 197 consecutive patients with pathologic reflux utilizing EndoFLIP™ technology. Intraoperative EGJ measurements including distensibility index (DI), cross-sectional area (CSA), and high-pressure zone (HPZ) length were collected. Dysphagia was assessed pre-operatively and at 3 months post-operatively.

RESULTS

The median pre-operative DI for all procedures was 2.6 (IQR 1.6-4.5) mm²/mmHg. There was no difference in post-operative DI between procedures [Hill: 0.9 (IQR 0.7-1.1) mm²/mmHg, Nissen: 1.0 (IQR 0.7-1.4) mm²/mmHg, Toupet: 1.2 (IQR 0.8-1.5) mm²/mmHg, Linx: 1.0 (IQR 0.7-1.2) mm²/mmHg, p = 0.24], whereas post-operative HPZ length differed by augmentation type [Hill: 3 (IQR 2.8-3) cm, Nissen: 3.5 (IQR 3-3.5) cm, Toupet: 3 (IQR 2.5-3.5) cm, Linx: 2.5 (IQR 2.5-3) cm, p = 0.032]. Eighty-nine patients (45.2%) had pre-operative dysphagia. Thirty-two patients (27.6%) reported any dysphagia at their 3-month post-operative visit and 12 (10.3%) developed new or worsening post-operative dysphagia [Hill: 2/18 (11.1%), Nissen: 2/35 (5.7%), Toupet: 4/54 (7.4%), Linx: 4/9 (44.4%), p = 0.006]. The median pre-operative and post-operative DI of patients who developed new or worsening dysphagia was 2.0 (IQR 0.9-3.8) mm²/mmHg and 1.2 (IQR 1.0-1.8) mm²/mmHg, respectively, and that of those who did not was 2.5 (IQR 1.6-4.0) mm²/mmHg and 1.0 (IQR 0.7-1.4) mm²/mmHg (p = 0.21 and 0.16, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Post-operative DI was similar between procedures, and there was no correlation with new or worsening post-operative dysphagia. Linx placement was associated with higher rates of new or worsening post-operative dysphagia despite a shorter post-procedure HPZ length and similar post-operative DI when compared to other methods of LES augmentation.

The Yield of Endoscopy and Histology in the Evaluation of Esophageal Dysphagia: Two Referral Centers’ Experiences

Background and Objectives: The initial diagnostic test required to evaluate esophageal dysphagia is upper endoscopy (EGD) to assess the structure of the esophagus and the esophageo-gastric junction (EGJ). Taking biopsies during EGD has become a common practice in patients with dysphagia to rule out eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). The aims of this study were to evaluate the endoscopic findings of patients who underwent EGD for esophageal dysphagia, to assess the rate of biopsy taking from the esophagus to diagnose/exclude EoE, and to report histology outcomes of these biopsies. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective multicenter study that included individuals ≥18 years who underwent EGD due to esophageal dysphagia between the years 2015 and2020, (with no other alarm signs, such as weight loss, new iron deficiency anemia, and lymphadenopathy). We obtained data from patients’ electronic files. The endoscopy and histology findings were obtained from endoscopy reports saved in our electronic files. Results: A total of 209 patients were included in the study. The average age was 57.1 ± 17.1 years. The most common endoscopic findings were normal endoscopy in 76 patients (36.4%) and erosive esophagitis in 75 patients (35.9%). Barrett’s esophagus and esophageal malignancy were encountered in 11 patients (5.3%) and 2 patients (0.95%), respectively. Esophageal biopsies were taken in 50.2% of patients, and one patient had histological evidence of EoE (0.5%). On univariate analysis, there was a trend for association between proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) use and a normal EGD, but it was not statistically significant (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.07–1.11, p = 0.07). Conclusions: Endoscopic findings were prevalent in dysphagia patients even when no other alarm symptoms exist. Neoplastic lesions and EOE were rare in our study.

A new technique for treating hiatal hernia with gastroesophageal reflux disease: the laparoscopic total left-side surgical approach

Introduction

Although the traditional bilateral surgical approach to treat hiatal hernia (HH) with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) can provide local protection of the vagus nerve, the integrity of the entire vagus nerve cannot be evaluated. Therefore, we developed and described the total left-side surgical approach (TLSA), which theoretically reduces injury to the vagus nerve, and described the detailed surgical procedure.

Methods

Initially, we performed a cadaver study to explore the characteristics of the vagus nerve. Then, we prospectively evaluated the TLSA in 5 patients with HH and GERD between June 2020 and September 2020. Demographic characteristics, surgical parameters, perioperative outcomes, and follow-up findings were analyzed.

Results

The TLSA was successfully used in five patients (40–64 years old), and no major complications were noted. The median total operative time was 114 min, median blood loss was 50 mL, and median postoperative hospital stay was 3.8 days. Gastrointestinal function recovered within 4 days of surgery in all the patients. The 6-month follow-up gastroscopy examination showed well-established gastroesophageal flap valves. Compared with the baseline results, the 6-month follow-up results showed lower values for the total GerdQ score (12.4 vs. 6.2) and the total esophageal acid exposure time (3.48% vs. 0.38%). Based on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire-stomach module 52 results, the incidence of dysphagia and flatulence decreased over time after the TLSA.

Conclusions

The TLSA provides a clear and broad surgical field, less trauma, and rapid recovery; moreover, it is technically simple. Although our results suggest that the TLSA provides safety and short-term efficacy and is feasible for patients with HH and GERD, long-term results from a larger clinical trial are needed to validate these findings.

Trial registration ChiCTR2000034028, registration date is June 21, 2020. The study was registered prospectively

The management of hiatal hernia: an update on diagnosis and treatment

Background and aim

Hiatal hernia (HH) occurs quite frequently in the general population and is characterized by a wide range of non-specific symptoms, most of them related to gastroesophageal reflux disease. Treatment can be challenging at times, depending on the existence of complications. The most recent guideline regarding the management of hiatal hernia was released by the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) in the year 2013. This review aims to present the most recent updates on the diagnosis and management of hiatal hernia for clinical practitioners.

Methods

The PubMed database was screened for publications using the terms: “hiatal hernia”, “paraesophageal hernia”, “management”, “treatment”, “hiatal repair”. A literature review of contemporary and latest studies was completed. The studies that we looked into include prospective, randomized trials, systematic reviews, clinical reviews and original articles. The information was compiled in narrative review format.

Results

This narrative review presents new data on the diagnosis and management of hiatal hernia. While the diagnostic pathway has remained virtually unchanged, new data have come to light regarding the surgical treatment of hiatal hernia. We present the imaging methods used for its diagnosis, as well as the medical and surgical treatment currently available.

Conclusion

In the last five years, there has been vast research in the field of hiatal hernia management, especially regarding the surgical treatment. However, unanswered questions still remain and solid updates on the guidelines have yet to be formulated. To address this, more randomized studies need to be done on subsets of patients, stratified by age, gender, symptoms and comorbidities.