Atrial fibrillation and heart failure: cause or effect?

Clinical Evidence and Proposed Mechanisms of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Class Effect?

Effective treatment for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is an unmet need in cardiovascular medicine. The pathophysiological drivers of HFpEF are complex, differing depending on phenotype, making a one-size-fits-all treatment approach unlikely. Remarkably, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) may be the first drug class to improve cardiovascular outcomes in HFpEF. Randomised controlled trials suggest a benefit in mortality, and demonstrate decreased hospitalisations and improvement in functional status. Limitations in trials exist, either due to small sample sizes, differing results between trials or decreased efficacy at higher ejection fractions. SGLT2is may provide a class effect by targeting various pathophysiological HFpEF mechanisms. Inhibition of SGLT2 and Na⁺/H⁺ exchanger 3 in the kidney promotes glycosuria, osmotic diuresis and natriuresis. The glucose deprivation activates sirtuins - protecting against oxidation and beneficially regulating metabolism. SGLT2is reduce excess epicardial adipose tissue and its deleterious adipokines. Na⁺/H⁺ exchanger 1 inhibition in the heart and lungs reduces sodium-induced calcium overload and pulmonary hypertension, respectively.

Clinical features and prognosis of acute myocardial infarction caused by non-tumor origin coronary artery embolism

BACKGROUND

Several studies have indicated that acute myocardial infarction (AMI) secondary to coronary artery embolism (CE) has a poor prognosis. However, in the latter studies, CE of tumor origin accounts for a considerable proportion of cases and the clinical features and contribution to overall prognosis of non-tumor CE are unknown and therefore the subject of this study.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied 2006 consecutive patients with AMI at our medical center from January 2014 to October 2018. Non-tumor CE was diagnosed based on angiographic, biochemical, and imaging criteria. Patients were divided into two groups: patients without CE (control) and patients with non-tumor CE.

RESULTS

Atrial fibrillation was the most frequent etiology (n = 32, 69.6%) in the non-tumor CE group (n = 46). Compared with the control group, the non-tumor CE group had (all p < 0.05): higher incidence of atrial fibrillation; larger left atrial diameter, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter and left ventricular end-systolic diameter; lower left ventricular ejection fraction, ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction incidence and low density lipoprotein cholesterol level; lower incidence of multivessel coronary stenosis, level of culprit lesion stenosis and proportion of angioplasty; higher ratio of manual thrombectomy and antithrombotic drugs alone therapy; lower thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) grade and higher corrected TIMI frame counts (CTFC) after reperfusion; and statistically similar overall survival at median 864 (interquartile range, 413-1272) days.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall incidence of non-tumor CE was 2.3%, with atrial fibrillation as its most common etiology. Midterm overall survival was similar between AMI patients secondary to non-tumor CE and those without CE.

Protective mechanism of SIRT1 on Hcy-induced atrial fibrosis mediated by TRPC3

High plasma levels of homocysteine (Hcy) are regarded as a risk factor for atrial fibrillation (AF), which is closely associated with the pathological consequence of atrial fibrosis and can lead to heart failure with a high mortality rate; here, we show that atrial fibrosis is mediated by the relationship between canonical transient receptor potential 3 (TRPC3) channels and sirtuin type 1 (SIRT1) under the stimulation of Hcy. The left atrial appendage was obtained from patients with either sinus rhythm (SR) or AF and used to evaluate the relationship between the concentration of Hcy and a potential mechanism of cardiac fibrosis mediated by TRPC3 and SIRT1. We next performed transverse aortic constriction (TAC) in mouse to investigate the relationship. The mechanisms underlying atrial fibrosis involving TRPC3 and SIRT1 proteins were explored by co‐IP, BLI and lentivirus transfection experiments. qPCR and WB were performed to analyse gene and protein expression, respectively. The higher level of atrial fibrosis was observed in the HH mouse group with a high Hcy diet. Such results suggest that AF patients may be more susceptible to atrial fibrosis and possess a high probability of progressing to hyperhomocysteinemia. Moreover, our findings are consistent with the hypothesis that TRPC3 channel up‐regulation leads to abnormal accumulation of collagen, with the down‐regulation of SIRT1 as an aetiological factor of high Hcy, which in turn predisposes to atrial fibrosis and strongly enhances the possibility of AF.

Rhythm control for patients with atrial fibrillation complicated with heart failure in the contemporary era of catheter ablation: a stratified pooled analysis of randomized data

Aims

The optimal treatment for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) has been a subject of debate for years. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rhythm control strategy in patients with AF complicated with HF regarding hard clinical endpoints.

Methods and results

Up-to-date randomized data comparing rhythm control using antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) vs. rate control (Subset A) or rhythm control using catheter ablation vs. medical therapy (Subset B) in AF and HF patients were pooled. The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, re-hospitalization, stroke, and thromboembolic events. A total of 11 studies involving 3598 patients were enrolled (Subset A: 2486; Subset B: 1112). As compared with medical rate control, the AADs rhythm control was associated with similar all-cause mortality [odds ratio (OR): 0.96, P = 0.65], significantly higher rate of re-hospitalization (OR: 1.25, P = 0.01), and similar rate of stroke and thromboembolic events (OR: 0.91, P = 0.76,); however, as compared with medical therapy, catheter ablation rhythm control was associated with significantly lower all-cause mortality (OR: 0.51, P = 0.0003), reduced re-hospitalization rate (OR: 0.44, P = 0.003), similar rate of stroke events (OR: 0.59, P = 0.27), greater improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction [weighted mean difference (WMD): 6.8%, P = 0.0004], lower arrhythmia recurrence (29.6% vs. 80.1%, OR: 0.04, P &lt; 0.00001), and greater improvement in quality of life (Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire score) (WMD: −9.1, P = 0.007).

Conclusion

Catheter ablation as rhythm control strategy substantially improves survival rate, reduces re-hospitalization, increases the maintenance rate of sinus rhythm, contributes to preserve cardiac function, and improves quality of life for AF patients complicated with HF.

Effectiveness and safety of oral anticoagulants in older adults with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and heart failure

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are at least as efficacious and safe as warfarin among non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients; limited evidence is available regarding NVAF patients with heart failure (HF). US Medicare enrollees with NVAF and HF initiating DOACs (apixaban, rivaroxaban, dabigatran) or warfarin were selected. Propensity score matching and Cox models were used to estimate the risk of stroke/systemic embolism (SE), major bleeding (MB), and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) comparing DOACs versus warfarin and DOACs versus DOACs. We identified 10,570 apixaban-warfarin, 4,297 dabigatran-warfarin, 15,712 rivaroxaban-warfarin, 4,263 apixaban-dabigatran, 10,477 apixaban-rivaroxaban, and 4,297 dabigatran-rivaroxaban matched pairs. Compared to warfarin, apixaban had lower rates of stroke/SE (hazard ratio = 0.64, 95% confidence interval = 0.48-0.85), MB (hazard ratio = 0.66, 0.58-0.76), and MACE (hazard ratio = 0.73,0.67-0.79); dabigatran and rivaroxaban had lower rates of MACE (hazard ratio = 0.87,0.77-0.99; hazard ratio = 0.84, 0.79-0.89, respectively). Rivaroxaban had a lower stroke/SE rate (hazard ratio = 0.65, 0.52-0.81) and higher MB rate (hazard ratio = 1.18, 1.08-1.30) versus warfarin. Compared to dabigatran and rivaroxaban, apixaban had lower MB (hazard ratio = 0.71, 0.57-0.89; hazard ratio = 0.55, 0.49-0.63) and MACE rates (hazard ratio = 0.80, 0.69-0.93; hazard ratio = 0.86, 0.79-0.94), respectively. All DOACs had lower MACE rates versus warfarin; differences were observed in stroke/SE and MB. Our findings provide insights about OAC therapy among NVAF patients with HF.

Anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation with heart failure

Heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) frequently coexist, and they can beget one another due to similar factors and shared pathophysiology. These pathophysiologic changes promote the episodes of AF, while they in turn predispose to the exacerbation of HF. In this review, we will discuss pathophysiological mechanisms shared by AF and HF. Patients with concomitant HF and AF are at a particularly high risk of thromboembolism, which contribute to even worse symptoms and poorer prognosis. Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) (warfarin) were the traditional medication in AF patients for the prevention of stroke, whereas the advance of novel non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs) (dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban, and edoxaban) is challenging these standard prescriptions. NOACs' potential advantages over warfarin, including fixed dosing regimens, wide therapeutic window, and more sustained anticoagulant response, promote clinicians to consider these novel agents in the first place. However, some data suggested patients with AF and HF may receive different therapeutic response than those with AF alone in anticoagulant treatment. Accordingly, we aim to assess the potential role of oral anticoagulants, especially NOACs, in the management of patients with concomitant AF and HF.

Genetics of Atrial Fibrilation: In Search of Novel Therapeutic Targets

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most frequent arrhythmogenic disease in humans, ranging from 2% in the general population and rising up to 10-12% in 80+ years. Genetic analyses of AF familiar cases have identified a series of point mutations in distinct ion channels, supporting a causative link. However, these genetic defects only explain a minority of AF patients. Genomewide association studies identified single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), close to PITX2 on 4q25 chromosome, that are highly associated to AF. Subsequent GWAS studies have identified several new loci, involving additional transcription and growth factors. Furthermore, these risk 4q25 SNPs serve as surrogate biomarkers to identify AF recurrence in distinct surgical and pharmacological interventions. Experimental studies have demonstrated an intricate signalling pathway supporting a key role of the homeobox transcription factor PITX2 as a transcriptional regulator. Furthermore, cardiovascular risk factors such as hyperthyroidism, hypertension and redox homeostasis have been identified to modulate PITX2 driven gene regulatory networks. We provide herein a state-of-the-art review of the genetic bases of atrial fibrillation, our current understanding of the genetic regulatory networks involved in AF and its plausible usage for searching novel therapeutic targets.

Familial clustering of atrial fibrillation and comparative longitudinal outcomes of familial and non-familial atrial fibrillation

Several studies have suggested that family history of atrial fibrillation (AF) is an important risk factor for AF, with several specific genetic regions now implicated through Genome Wide Association Studies. In addition, familial AF is associated with earlier age of onset and affects patients with fewer comorbid conditions than their non-familial counterparts. While those with familial AF have worse symptoms, all-cause mortality and risk of thromboembolic complications are similar among familial and non-familial AF patients.

Gene regulatory networks in atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most frequent arrhythmogenic syndrome in humans. With an estimate incidence of 1%-2% in the general population, AF raises up to almost 10%-12% in 80+ years. Thus, AF represents nowadays a highly prevalent medical problem generating a large economic burden. At the electrophysiological level, distinct mechanisms have been elucidated. Yet, despite its prevalence, the genetic and molecular culprits of this pandemic cardiac electrophysiological abnormality have remained largely obscure. Molecular genetics of AF familiar cases have demonstrated that single nucleotide mutations in distinct genes encoding for ion channels underlie the onset of AF, albeit such alterations only explain a minor subset of patients with AF. In recent years, analyses by means of genome-wide association studies have unraveled a more complex picture of the etiology of AF, pointing out to distinct cardiac-enriched transcription factors, as well as to other regulatory genes. Furthermore a new layer of regulatory mechanisms have emerged, i.e., post-transcriptional regulation mediated by non-coding RNA, which have been demonstrated to exert pivotal roles in cardiac electrophysiology. In this manuscript, we aim to provide a comprehensive review of the genetic regulatory networks that if impaired exert electrophysiological abnormalities that contribute to the onset, and subsequently, on self-perpetuation of AF.