The Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction Conundrum-Redefining the Problem and Finding Common Ground? Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2020;17:34-42. [PMID: 32112345 DOI: 10.1007/s11897-020-00454-2]

Diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a systematic narrative review of the evidence

Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a common condition in clinical practice, affecting more than half of patients with HF. HFpEF is associated with morbidity and mortality and with considerable healthcare resource utilization and costs. Therefore, early diagnosis is crucial to facilitate prompt management, particularly initiation of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors. Although European guidelines define HFpEF as the presence of symptoms with or without signs of HF, left ventricular EF ≥ 50%, and objective evidence of cardiac structural and/or functional abnormalities, together with elevated natriuretic peptide levels, the diagnosis of HFpEF remains challenging. First, there is no clear consensus on how HFpEF should be defined. Furthermore, diagnostic tools, such as natriuretic peptide levels and resting echocardiogram findings, are significantly limited in the diagnosis of HFpEF. As a result, some patients are overdiagnosed (i.e., elderly people with comorbidities that mimic HF), although in other cases, HFpEF is overlooked. In this manuscript, we perform a systematic narrative review of the diagnostic approach to patients with HFpEF. We also propose a comprehensible algorithm that can be easily applied in daily clinical practice and could prove useful for confirming or ruling out a diagnosis of HFpEF.

Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitor Prevents Stroke in Patients With Diabetes and Atrial Fibrillation

Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with increasing risk of thromboembolic or ischemic stroke. The CHA₂DS₂-VASc score is a well-established predictor of AF stroke. Patients with AF have an increased risk of stroke if they have diabetes. Use of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) has been shown to be associated with favorable cardiovascular outcomes in patients with diabetes. It was unknown whether use of SGLT2i decreased stroke risk in patients with AF who have diabetes. Methods and Results A total of 9116 patients with AF and diabetes from the National Taiwan University historical cohort were longitudinally followed up for 5 years (January 2016-December 2020). The risk of stroke related to SGLT2i use was evaluated by Cox model, adjusting CHA₂DS₂-VASc score in the propensity score-matched population with 474 SGLT2i users and 3235 nonusers. Adverse thromboembolic end points during follow-up were defined as ischemic stroke. The mean age was 73.2±10.5 years, and 61% of patients were men. There were no significant differences of baseline characteristics between users and nonusers of SGLT2i, including CHA₂DS₂-VASc score in the propensity score-matched population. The stroke rate was 3.4% (95% CI, 2.8-4.2) patient-years in SGLT2i users and 4.3% (95% CI, 4.0-4.6) in nonusers (P=0.021). SGLT2i users had a 20% reduction of stroke (hazard ratio, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.64-0.99]; P=0.043) after adjustment for the CHA₂DS₂-VASc score. Conclusions Use of SGLT2i was associated with a lower stroke risk in patients with diabetes and AF, and it may be considered to escalate SGLT2i to the first-line treatment in patients with diabetes and AF.

Malthusian Trajectory for Heart Failure and Novel Translational Ambulatory Technologies

INTRODUCTION

It has been estimated that congestive heart failure (CHF) will reach epidemic proportions and contribute to large unsustainable impacts on health budgets for any cardiovascular condition. Against other major trends in cardiovascular outcomes, readmission and disease burden continue to rise as the demographics shift.

METHODS

The rise in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) among elderly women will present new challenges. Gold standard care delivers sustainable and cost-effective health improvements using organised care programs. When coordinated with large hospitals, this can be replicated universally.

RESULTS

A gradient of outcomes and ambulatory care needs to be shifted from established institutions and shared with clients and community health services, being a sizeable proportion of CHF care.

CONCLUSION

In this review, we explore health technologies as an emerging opportunity to address gaps in CHF management.

Impact of Structural Abnormalities in Left Ventricle and Left Atrium on Clinical Outcomes in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Two key echocardiographic parameters, left ventricular mass index (LVMI) and left atrial volume index (LAVI), are important in assessing structural myocardial changes in heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, the differences in clinical characteristics and outcomes among groups classified by LVMI and LAVI values are unclear.We examined the data of 960 patients with HFpEF hospitalized due to acute decompensated HF from the PURSUIT-HFpEF registry, a prospective, multicenter observational study. Four groups were classified according to the cut-off values of LVMI and LAVI [LVMI = 95 g/m2 (female), 115 g/m2 (male) and LAVI = 34 mL/m2]. Clinical endpoints were the composite of HF readmission and all-cause death. Study endpoints among the 4 groups were evaluated. The composite endpoint occurred in 364 patients (37.9%). Median follow-up duration was 445 days. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed significant differences in the composite endpoint among the 4 groups (P < 0.001). Cox proportional hazards analysis demonstrated that patients with increased LAVI alone were at significantly higher risk of HF readmission and the composite endpoints than those with increased LVMI alone (P = 0.030 and P = 0.024, respectively). Age, male gender, systolic blood pressure at discharge, atrial fibrillation (AF) hemoglobin, renal function, and LAVI were significant determinants of LVMI and female gender, AF, hemoglobin, and LVMI were significant determinants of LAVI.In HFpEF patients, increased LAVI alone was more strongly associated with HF readmission and the composite of HF readmission and all-cause death than those with increased LVMI alone.

Clinical impact of blood urea nitrogen, regardless of renal function, in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

BACKGROUND

Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) reflects decreased glomerular filtration rate (GFR). The effect of BUN on clinical outcomes, excluding the impact of GFR, in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) patients remains unknown.

METHODS

We enrolled HFpEF (left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50%) patients hospitalized due to acute decompensated heart failure (HF) from PURSUIT-HFpEF registry which was prospective, multicenter and observational study. For excluding the effect of renal function on BUN value, propensity score-matching was performed using the variables which were associated with GFR. The incidence of composite of all-cause death and HF readmission among the patients stratified by BUN and the association between BUN and echocardiographic parameters in HFpEF patients were evaluated.

RESULTS

We finally analyzed 1029 patients. In the present study, BUN cut-off value was defined as 24.4 mg/dL, which was the median value in overall population. The high and low BUN groups consisted of 193 patients after 1:1 propensity score-matching, respectively. The median follow-up duration was 401 days and the composite endpoint occurred in 129 patients (33.4%). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed the high BUN group had a significantly greater risk of the composite endpoint than the low group in the propensity score-matched pairs (p = 0.032). BUN value significantly correlated with left atrial volume index by multiple regression analysis using echocardiographic parameters (standardized beta-coefficient = 0.139, p = 0.043).

CONCLUSION

BUN was a useful marker for the composite of all-cause death and HF readmission, regardless of the baseline renal function and correlated with left atrial function in HFpEF patients.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

UMIN000021831 <https://uplaod.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000024414>; PURSUIT-HFpEF.

The Value of Echocardiography Combined with NT-pro BNP Level in Assessment and Prognosis of Diastolic Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

To investigate the significance of echocardiography combined with N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-pro BNP) levels in the evaluation and prognosis of diastolic heart failure (DHF).

METHODS

Clinical data were collected from 168 patients with DHF. Serum levels of NT-pro BNP were first measured by ELISA. Meanwhile, the echocardiography was used to examine left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), left ventricular diameter (LVD), and other parameters. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed for variables in heart failure assessment grade or poor prognosis. Finally, the predictive ability for New York Heart Association (NYHA) class as well as prognosis was assessed by ROC curves.

RESULTS

NT-pro BNP was the overexpression in the serum of patients with DHF. And the degree of elevation was related to NYHA class, while NT-pro BNP levels were significantly higher in the P-MACE group than in the N-MACE group. According to the multivariate logistic regression analysis, the ratio of peak velocity of left atrial early diastolic blood flow to early diastolic peak velocity of mitral annulus (E/Ea) and serum NT-pro BNP level was risk factors for NYHA class and prognosis. However, LVEF, LVEDD, and flow propagation velocity (Vp) can be a benefit condition. In addition, ROC curve showed that echocardiography combined with NT-pro BNP content had higher accuracy in NYHA class and prognostic assessment of DHF than applied separately.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnosis of echocardiography combined with NT-pro BNP levels has the potential to distinguish the NYHA class in heart function of patients with DHF and determine the prognosis of patients.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction based on aging and comorbidities

Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a leading cause of hospitalizations and mortality when diagnosed at the age of ≥ 65 years. HFpEF represents multifactorial and multisystemic syndrome and has different pathophysiology and phenotypes. Its diagnosis is difficult to be established based on left ventricular ejection fraction and may benefit from individually tailored approaches, underlying age-related changes and frequent comorbidities. Compared with the rapid development in the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, HFpEF presents a great challenge and needs to be addressed considering the failure of HF drugs to improve its outcomes. Further extensive studies on the relationships between HFpEF, aging, and comorbidities in carefully phenotyped HFpEF subgroups may help understand the biology, diagnosis, and treatment of HFpEF. The current review summarized the diagnostic and therapeutic development of HFpEF based on the complex relationships between aging, comorbidities, and HFpEF.

Impact of admission hyperglycaemia on clinical outcomes in non-diabetic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Aims

At present, the clinical significance of admission hyperglycaemia in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) patients remains unknown. This study was designed to evaluate the relationship between admission hyperglycaemia and clinical outcome in HFpEF patients, especially in non‐diabetic patients.

Methods and results

We enrolled 486 non‐diabetic HFpEF (left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50%) patients hospitalized due to acute decompensated heart failure from the PURSUIT‐HFpEF registry, a prospective, multicentre observational study. We divided non‐diabetic patients into two groups, an admission hyperglycaemia group whose blood glucose on admission was ≥7.0 mmol/L (148 patients) and a normoglycaemic group whose blood glucose on admission was <7.0 mmol/L (338 patients). The primary endpoint was all‐cause mortality, and the secondary endpoints were heart failure death and other causes of cardiac death. During a mean follow‐up period of 400 ± 335 days, all‐cause mortality was 69 patients. Twenty‐five patients suffered cardiac death. All‐cause mortality (P = 0.002), cardiac death (P = 0.009), and heart failure death (P = 0.001) were significantly more frequent in the admission hyperglycaemia group than in the normoglycaemic group. Admission hyperglycaemia was independently and significantly associated with all‐cause mortality and cardiac death (HR 2.01, 95% CI 1.20–3.34, P = 0.008 and HR 3.03, 95% CI 1.35–6.96, P = 0.007, respectively).

Conclusions

Non‐diabetic HFpEF patients with admission hyperglycaemia when hospitalized for heart failure had poorer clinical outcomes than normoglycaemic patients.

Forensic interrogation of diabetic endothelitis in cardiovascular diseases and clinical translation in heart failure

Diabetic heart disease (DHD) can be classified as a primary consequence from several pathophysiological manifestation of diabetes mellitus (DM) on cardiac tissues or secondarily in extracardiac tissues and is encountered as either primary or secondary complications of DM. Endothelitis is inflammation of the vascular endothelium and is likely to be seen in the majority of patients who start to manifest an end organ complication of DM in this case DHD. Diabetes is a leading cause for many cardiovascular syndromes and diseases including congestive heart failure (CHF) however much remains unknown about the transition from diagnosed DM to clinical state and the contribution of the various mechanical and counterregulatory systems in the manifested complaint. Diastolic heart failure or heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (DHF/HFpEF), accounts for half of all CHF presentations, has DM as a major contributor, however, there remain large gaps in clinical and pathophysiological understanding. This review aims to explore the microscopic aspects in diabetic endothelitis and provide a clinical link to with context to HFpEF.

Serum and Echocardiographic Markers May Synergistically Predict Adverse Cardiac Remodeling after ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Patients with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Improvement of risk scoring is particularly important for patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) who generally lack efficient monitoring of progressing heart failure. Here, we evaluated whether the combination of serum biomarkers and echocardiographic parameters may be useful to predict the remodeling-related outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and preserved LVEF (HFpEF) as compared to those with reduced LVEF (HFrEF). Echocardiographic assessment and measurement of the serum levels of NT-proBNP, sST2, galectin-3, matrix metalloproteinases, and their inhibitors (MMP-1, MMP-2, MMP-3, TIMP-1) was performed at the time of admission (1st day) and on the 10th–12th day upon STEMI onset. We found a reduction in NT-proBNP, sST2, galectin-3, and TIMP-1 in both patient categories from hospital admission to the discharge, as well as numerous correlations between the indicated biomarkers and echocardiographic parameters, testifying to the ongoing ventricular remodeling. In patients with HFpEF, NT-proBNP, sST2, galectin-3, and MMP-3 correlated with the parameters reflecting the diastolic dysfunction, while in patients with HFrEF, these markers were mainly associated with LVEF and left ventricular end-systolic volume/diameter. Therefore, the combination of the mentioned serum biomarkers and echocardiographic parameters might be useful for the prediction of adverse cardiac remodeling in patients with HFpEF.