Contemporary Use of Interferon Therapy in the Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Recombinant Interferon-β in the Treatment of Polycythemia Vera and Related Neoplasms: Rationales and Perspectives

About 30 years ago, the first clinical trials of the safety and efficacy of recombinant interferon-α2 (rIFN-α2) were performed. Since then, several single-arm studies have shown rIFN-α2 to be a highly potent anticancer agent against several cancer types. Unfortunately, however, a high toxicity profile in early studies with rIFN-α2 -among other reasons likely due to the high dosages being used-disqualified rIFN-α2, which was accordingly replaced with competitive drugs that might at first glance look more attractive to clinicians. Later, pegylated IFN-α2a (Pegasys) and pegylated IFN-α2b (PegIntron) were introduced, which have since been reported to be better tolerated due to reduced toxicity. Today, treatment with rIFN-α2 is virtually outdated in non-hematological cancers, where other immunotherapies-e.g., immune-checkpoint inhibitors-are routinely used in several cancer types and are being intensively investigated in others, either as monotherapy or in combination with immunomodulatory agents, although only rarely in combination with rIFN-α2. Within the hematological malignancies, rIFN-α2 has been used off-label for decades in patients with Philadelphia-negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs)-i.e., essential thrombocythemia, polycythemia vera, and myelofibrosis-and in recent years rIFN-α2 has been revived with the marketing of ropeginterferon-α2b (Besremi) for the treatment of polycythemia vera patients. Additionally, rIFN-α2 has been revived for the treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia in combination with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Another rIFN formulation-recombinant interferon-β (rIFN-β)-has been used for decades in the treatment of multiple sclerosis but has never been studied as a potential agent to be used in patients with MPNs, although several studies and reviews have repeatedly described rIFN-β as an effective anticancer agent as well. In this paper, we describe the rationales and perspectives for launching studies on the safety and efficacy of rIFN-β in patients with MPNs.

A rare atypical chronic myeloid leukemia BCR-ABL1 negative with concomitant JAK2 V617F and SETBP1 mutations: a case report and literature review

Atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (aCML) BCR-ABL1 negative is a rare myelodysplastic syndromes/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MDS/MPN) for which no standard treatment currently exists. The advent of next-generation sequencing has allowed our understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of aCML to be expanded and has made it possible for clinicians to more accurately differentiate aCML from similar MDS/MPN overlap syndrome and MPN counterparts, as MPN-associated driver mutations in JAK2, CALR, or MPL are typically absent in aCML. A 55-year old male with main complaints of weight loss and fatigue for more than half a year and night sweats for more than 2 months was admitted to our hospital. Further examination revealed increased white blood cells, splenomegaly, and grade 1 bone marrow fibrosis with JAK2 V617F, which supported a preliminary diagnosis of pre-primary marrow fibrosis. However, in addition to JAK2 V617F (51.00%), next-generation sequencing also detected SETBP1 D868N (46.00%), ASXL1 G645fs (36.09%), and SRSF2 P95_R102del (33.56%) mutations. According to the 2016 World Health Organization diagnostic criteria, the patient was ultimately diagnosed with rare aCML with concomitant JAK2 V617F and SETBP1 mutations. The patient received targeted therapy of ruxolitinib for 5 months and subsequently an additional four courses of combined hypomethylating therapy. The patient exhibited an optimal response, with decreased spleen volume by approximately 35% after therapy and improved symptom scores after therapy. In diagnosing primary bone marrow fibrosis, attention should be paid to the identification of MDS/MPN. In addition to basic cell morphology, mutational analysis using next-generation sequencing plays an increasingly important role in the differential diagnosis. aCML with concomitant JAK2 V617F and SETBP1 mutations has been rarely reported, and targeted therapy for mutated JAK2 may benefit patients, especially those not suitable recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplants.

C/EBPβ is a critical mediator of IFN-α-induced exhaustion of chronic myeloid leukemia stem cells

Even in the era of ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors, eradication of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) stem cells is necessary for complete cure of the disease. Interferon-α (IFN-α) has long been used for the treatment of chronic-phase CML, but its mechanisms of action against CML stem cells remain unclear. We found that IFN-α upregulated CCAAT/enhancer binding protein β (C/EBPβ) in BCR-ABL-expressing mouse cells by activating STAT1 and STAT5, which were recruited to a newly identified 3' distal enhancer of Cebpb that contains tandemly aligned IFN-γ-activated site elements. Suppression or deletion of the IFN-γ-activated site elements abrogated IFN-α-dependent upregulation of C/EBPβ. IFN-α induced differentiation and exhaustion of CML stem cells, both in vitro and in vivo, in a C/EBPβ-dependent manner. In addition, IFN-α upregulated C/EBPβ and induced exhaustion of lineage^- CD34⁺ cells from CML patients. Collectively, these results clearly indicate that C/EBPβ is a critical mediator of IFN-α-induced differentiation and exhaustion of CML stem cells.

Data-driven analysis of JAK2V617F kinetics during interferon-alpha2 treatment of patients with polycythemia vera and related neoplasms

Treatment with PEGylated interferon-alpha2 (IFN) of patients with essential thrombocythemia and polycythemia vera induces major molecular remissions with a reduction in the JAK2V617F allele burden to undetectable levels in a subset of patients. A favorable response to IFN has been argued to depend upon the tumor burden, implying that institution of treatment with IFN should be as early as possible after the diagnosis. However, evidence for this statement is not available. We present a thorough analysis of unique serial JAK2V617F measurements in 66 IFN-treated patients and in 6 untreated patients. Without IFN treatment, the JAK2V617F allele burden increased exponentially with a period of doubling of 1.4 year. During monotherapy with IFN, the JAK2V617F allele burden decreased mono- or bi-exponentially for 33 responders of which 28 patients satisfied both descriptions. Bi-exponential description improved the fits in 19 cases being associated with late JAK2V617F responses. The decay of the JAK2V617F allele burden during IFN treatment was estimated to have half-lives of 1.6 year for the monoexponential response and 1.0 year in the long term for the bi-exponential response. In conclusion, through data-driven analysis of the JAK2V617F allele burden, we provide novel information regarding the JAK2V617F kinetics during IFN-treatment, arguing for early intervention.

Novel strategies for the treatment of myelofibrosis driven by recent advances in understanding the role of the microenvironment in its etiology

Myelofibrosis is the advanced stage of the Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), characterized by systemic inflammation, hematopoietic failure in the bone marrow, and development of extramedullary hematopoiesis, mainly in the spleen. The only potentially curative therapy for this disease is hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, an option that may be offered only to those patients with a compatible donor and with an age and functional status that may face its toxicity. By contrast, with the Philadelphia-positive MPNs that can be dramatically modified by inhibitors of the novel BCR-ABL fusion-protein generated by its genetic lesion, the identification of the molecular lesions that lead to the development of myelofibrosis has not yet translated into a treatment that can modify the natural history of the disease. Therefore, the cure of myelofibrosis remains an unmet clinical need. However, the excitement raised by the discovery of the genetic lesions has inspired additional studies aimed at elucidating the mechanisms driving these neoplasms towards their final stage. These studies have generated the feeling that the cure of myelofibrosis will require targeting both the malignant stem cell clone and its supportive microenvironment. We will summarize here some of the biochemical alterations recently identified in MPNs and the novel therapeutic approaches currently under investigation inspired by these discoveries.

Novel treatments to tackle myelofibrosis

INTRODUCTION

Despite the dramatic progress made in the treatment of patients with myelofibrosis since the introduction of the JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib, a therapeutic option that can modify the natural history of the disease and prevent evolution to blast-phase is still lacking. Recent investigational treatments including immunomodulatory drugs and histone deacetylase inhibitors benefit some patients but these effects have proven modest at best. Several novel agents do show promising activity in preclinical studies and early-phase clinical trials. We will illustrate a snapshot view of where the management of myelofibrosis is evolving, in an era of personalized medicine and advanced molecular diagnostics. Areas covered: A literature search using MEDLINE and recent meeting abstracts was performed using the keywords below. It focused on therapies in active phases of development based on their scientific and preclinical rationale with the intent to highlight agents that have novel biological effects. Expert commentary: The most mature advances in treatment of myelofibrosis are the development of second-generation JAK1/2 inhibitors and improvements in expanding access to donors for transplantation. In addition, there are efforts to identify drugs that target pathways other than JAK/STAT signaling that might improve the survival of myelofibrosis patients, and limit the need for stem-cell transplantation.

Prognostication and Initiation of Therapy in Polycythemia Vera: Do We Have it Right?

ᅟ.