Novel Therapies for Myelofibrosis

DARS expression in BCR/ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms and its association with the immune microenvironment

DARS, encoding for aspartyl-tRNA synthetase, is implicated in the pathogenesis of various cancers, including renal cell carcinoma, glioblastoma, colon cancer, and gastric cancer. Its role in BCR/ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), however, remains unexplored. This study aimed to elucidate the expression of DARS in patients with MPNs (PV 23, ET 19, PMF 16) through immunohistochemical analysis and to examine the profiles of circulating immune cells and cytokines using flow cytometry. Our findings indicate a significant overexpression of DARS in all MPNs subtypes at the protein level compared to controls (P < 0.05). Notably, elevated DARS expression was linked to splenomegaly in MPNs patients. The expression of DARS showed a negative correlation with CD4+ T cells (R = - 0.451, P = 0.0004) and CD4+ T/CD8+ T cell ratio (R = - 0.3758, P = 0.0040), as well as with CD68+ tumor-associated macrophages (R = 0.4037, P = 0.0017). Conversely, it was positively correlated with IL-2 (R = 0.5419, P < 0.001), IL-5 (R = 0.3161, P = 0.0166), IL-6 (R = 0.2992, P = 0.0238), and IFN-γ (R = 0.3873, P = 0.0029). These findings underscore a significant association between DARS expression in MPNs patients and specific clinical characteristics, as well as immune cell composition. Further investigation into the interplay between DARS and the immune microenvironment in MPNs could shed light on the underlying mechanisms of MPNs pathogenesis and immune dysregulation.

JAK2 inhibitors for the treatment of Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms: current status and future directions

The overactivation of Janus kinases 2 (JAK2) by gain-of-function mutations in the JAK2, Myeloproliferative leukemia virus oncogene, or Calreticulin genes are the most important factor in the development of Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). The discovery of the JAK2V617F mutation is a significant breakthrough in understanding the pathogenesis of MPNs, and inhibition of JAK2 abnormal activation has become one of the most effective strategies against MPNs. Currently, three JAK2 inhibitors for treating MPNs have been approved, and several are being evaluated in clinical trials. However, persistent challenges in terms of drug resistance and off-target effects remain unresolved. In this review, we introduce and classify the available JAK2 inhibitors in terms of their mechanisms and clinical considerations. Additionally, through an analysis of target points, binding modes, and structure-activity inhibitor relationships, we propose strategies such as combination therapy and allosteric inhibitors to overcome specific challenges. This review offers valuable insights into current trends and future directions for optimal management of MPNs using JAK2 inhibitors.

Improvement in Primary Autoimmune Myelofibrosis Following a Short Course of Steroids and Intravenous Immunoglobulins

Bone marrow fibrosis (BMF) is a histopathological finding appreciated in a multitude of conditions such as myeloproliferative diseases and malignant neoplasms, along with autoimmune disorders. Autoimmune myelofibrosis (AIMF) is a particularly uncommon etiology of benign BMF. AIMF may be primary with serologic evidence of autoantibodies or secondary to an underlying autoimmune disease. The authors aim to emphasize the importance of distinguishing between primary versus secondary causes owing to significant prognostic and therapeutic discrepancies and in hopes of expediting the diagnostic journey. Research has recommended a treatment strategy of high-dose steroids followed by a steroid taper. However, our patient responded positively to a short course of high-dose steroids and intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) as evidenced by an improvement in cytopenias and bone marrow fibrosis grading. This outcome warrants further research on the necessity of steroid tapers in AIMF.

Bone marrow microenvironment of MPN cells

In this chapter, we will discuss the current knowledge concerning the alterations of the cellular components in the bone marrow niche in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MPNs), highlighting the central role of the megakaryocytes in MPN progression, and the extracellular matrix components characterizing the fibrotic bone marrow.

The Rationale for Immunotherapy in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The classic, chronic Philadelphia chromosome negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN)-essential thrombocythemia (ET), polycythemia vera (PV), and myelofibrosis (MF)-are clonal malignancies of hematopoietic stem cells and are associated with myeloproliferation, organomegaly, and constitutional symptoms. Expanding knowledge that chronic inflammation and a dysregulated immune system are central to the pathogenesis and progression of MPNs serves as a driving force for the development of agents affecting the immune system as therapy for MPN. This review describes the rationale and potential impact of anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, and targeted agents in MPNs.

RECENT FINDINGS

The advances in molecular insights, especially the discovery of the Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) V617F mutation and its role in JAK-STAT pathway dysregulation, led to the development of the JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib, which currently represents the cornerstone of medical therapy in MF and hydroxyurea-resistant/intolerant PV. However, there remain significant unmet needs in the treatment of these patients, and many agents continue to be investigated. Novel, more selective JAK inhibitors might offer reduced myelosuppression or even improvement of blood counts. The recent approval of a novel, long-acting interferon for PV patients in Europe, might eventually lead to its broader clinical use in all MPNs. Targeted immunotherapy involving monoclonal antibodies, checkpoint inhibitors, or therapeutic vaccines against selected MPN epitopes could further enhance tumor-specific immune responses. Immunotherapeutic approaches are expanding and hopefully will extend the therapeutic armamentarium in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Immunotherapy in Myeloproliferative Diseases

Myeloproliferative diseases, including myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), are driven by genetic abnormalities and increased inflammatory signaling and are at high risk to transform into acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Myeloid-derived suppressor cells were reported to enhance leukemia immune escape by suppressing an effective anti-tumor immune response. MPNs are a potentially immunogenic disease as shown by their response to interferon-α treatment and allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Novel immunotherapeutic approaches such as immune checkpoint inhibition, tumor vaccination, or cellular therapies using target-specific lymphocytes have so far not shown strong therapeutic efficacy. Potential reasons could be the pro-inflammatory and immunosuppressive microenvironment in the bone marrow of patients with MPN, driving tumor immune escape. In this review, we discuss the biology of MPNs with respect to the pro-inflammatory milieu in the bone marrow (BM) and potential immunotherapeutic approaches.

Management of myelofibrosis after ruxolitinib failure

Myelofibrosis is a BCR-ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by anemia, progressive splenomegaly, extramedullary hematopoiesis, bone marrow fibrosis, constitutional symptoms, leukemic progression, and shortened survival. Constitutive activation of the Janus kinase/signal transducers and activators of transcription (JAK-STAT) pathway, and other cellular pathways downstream, leads to myeloproliferation, proinflammatory cytokine expression, and bone marrow remodeling. Transplant is the only curative option for myelofibrosis, but high rates of morbidity and mortality limit eligibility. Several prognostic models have been developed to facilitate treatment decisions. Until the recent approval of fedratinib, a JAK2 inhibitor, ruxolitinib was the only available JAK inhibitor for treatment of intermediate- or high-risk myelofibrosis. Ruxolitinib reduces splenomegaly to some degree in almost all treated patients; however, many patients cannot tolerate ruxolitinib due to dose-dependent drug-related cytopenias, and even patients with a good initial response often develop resistance to ruxolitinib after 2-3 years of therapy. Currently, there is no consensus definition of ruxolitinib failure. Until fedratinib approval, strategies to overcome ruxolitinib resistance or intolerance were mainly different approaches to continued ruxolitinib therapy, including dosing modifications and ruxolitinib rechallenge. Fedratinib and two other JAK2 inhibitors in later stages of clinical development, pacritinib and momelotinib, have been shown to induce clinical responses and improve symptoms in patients previously treated with ruxolitinib. Fedratinib induces robust spleen responses, and pacritinib and momelotinib may have preferential activity in patients with severe cytopenias. Reviewed here are strategies to ameliorate ruxolitinib resistance or intolerance, and outcomes of clinical trials in patients with myelofibrosis receiving second-line JAK inhibitors after ruxolitinib treatment.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions: Myelofibrosis

The discovery of a mutation in the Janus Kinase 2 gene in 2005 spurred significant progress in the field of myeloproliferative neoplasms. A comprehensive description of genomic factors at play in the malignant clone in myeloproliferative neoplasms, particularly myelofibrosis (MF), have recently led to more precise, personalized prognostic tools. Despite this, understanding of the disease pathogenesis remains relatively limited. We continue to lack a detailed description of the interaction between the hematopoietic stem cell clone, abnormal bone marrow niche cells, and circulating signaling molecules and an understanding of how they cooperate to promote cell proliferation, fibrogenesis, and extramedullary hematopoiesis. Despite our knowledge gaps, recent research in MF has led to promising clinical translation. In this article, we summarize recent insights into MF pathophysiology, progress in the development of novel therapeutics, and opportunities for further advancement of the field.

Exploring the Mechanism of Danshen against Myelofibrosis by Network Pharmacology and Molecular Docking

Danshen (Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge), a natural powerful drug for various conditions treatment, has traditionally been used in Asian countries for centuries as anticancer agent, anti-inflammatory agent, and antioxidant. More recently, it is explored in combination with other herbs for skeletal diseases therapy; bone-targeting compounds with pharmacological activities have been isolated from various sources of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), including Danshen. In this case, some evidence supports that Danshen may treat myelofibrosis (MF) by exerting its antitumor effect. To study the specific mechanism of Danshen in the treatment of MF, we used bioinformatics databases to determine its active ingredients. Then, identification of target proteins related to MF was made using a network pharmacology analysis platform. In our results, 20 key active compounds and 457 key targets of Danshen were identified. In-depth network analysis of the top diseases, functions, and pathways suggested that a common underlying mechanism linked Danshen involvement with MF. Finally, 5 potential targets were confirmed by the analysis; these 5 targets, as well as 20 previously identified compounds, were subjected to molecular docking experiments. The results indicated that cryptotanshinone of Danshen may affect MF by acting on the key genes in the JAK-STAT signalling pathway and the TGF-β signalling pathway.

Novel treatments to tackle myelofibrosis

INTRODUCTION

Despite the dramatic progress made in the treatment of patients with myelofibrosis since the introduction of the JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib, a therapeutic option that can modify the natural history of the disease and prevent evolution to blast-phase is still lacking. Recent investigational treatments including immunomodulatory drugs and histone deacetylase inhibitors benefit some patients but these effects have proven modest at best. Several novel agents do show promising activity in preclinical studies and early-phase clinical trials. We will illustrate a snapshot view of where the management of myelofibrosis is evolving, in an era of personalized medicine and advanced molecular diagnostics. Areas covered: A literature search using MEDLINE and recent meeting abstracts was performed using the keywords below. It focused on therapies in active phases of development based on their scientific and preclinical rationale with the intent to highlight agents that have novel biological effects. Expert commentary: The most mature advances in treatment of myelofibrosis are the development of second-generation JAK1/2 inhibitors and improvements in expanding access to donors for transplantation. In addition, there are efforts to identify drugs that target pathways other than JAK/STAT signaling that might improve the survival of myelofibrosis patients, and limit the need for stem-cell transplantation.

Pacritinib and its use in the treatment of patients with myelofibrosis who have thrombocytopenia

The treatment landscape for myelofibrosis (MF) has reached the molecular era by targeting different pathways that are implied in this myeloproliferative neoplasm. A few years ago, the first-in-class JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib, demonstrated reductions in both constitutional symptoms and splenomegaly, leading to the US FDA approval. The development or worsening of cytopenias in patients receiving ruxolitinib uncovered an unmet need that has been addressed by alternative approaches. Pacritinib, a dual JAK2 and FLT3 inhibitor which also inhibits IRAK1, has demonstrated the ability to favorably impact MF-associated splenomegaly and symptom burden, while having limited myelosuppression with manageable gastrointestinal toxicity. Herein, we provide an overview of pacritinib, from early preclinical studies to the latest and ongoing PAC203 trial, as an emerging therapy for MF.