Recognizing and Overcoming Resistance to New Beta-Lactam/Beta-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations

The prevalence of gram-negative bacteria with difficult-to-treat resistance and utilization of novel β-lactam antibiotics in the southeastern United States

Objective

To evaluate temporal trends in the prevalence of gram-negative bacteria (GNB) with difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) in the southeastern United States. Secondary objective was to examine the use of novel β-lactams for GNB with DTR by both antimicrobial use (AU) and a novel metric of adjusted AU by microbiological burden (am-AU).

Design

Retrospective, multicenter, cohort.

Setting

Ten hospitals in the southeastern United States.

Methods

GNB with DTR including Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter spp. from 2015 to 2020 were tracked at each institution. Cumulative AU of novel β-lactams including ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam, and cefiderocol in days of therapy (DOT) per 1,000 patient-days was calculated. Linear regression was utilized to examine temporal trends in the prevalence of GNB with DTR and cumulative AU of novel β-lactams.

Results

The overall prevalence of GNB with DTR was 0.85% (1,223/143,638) with numerical increase from 0.77% to 1.00% between 2015 and 2020 (P = .06). There was a statistically significant increase in DTR Enterobacterales (0.11% to 0.28%, P = .023) and DTR Acinetobacter spp. (4.2% to 18.8%, P = .002). Cumulative AU of novel β-lactams was 1.91 ± 1.95 DOT per 1,000 patient-days. When comparing cumulative mean AU and am-AU, there was an increase from 1.91 to 2.36 DOT/1,000 patient-days, with more than half of the hospitals shifting in ranking after adjustment for microbiological burden.

Conclusions

The overall prevalence of GNB with DTR and the use of novel β-lactams remain low. However, the uptrend in the use of novel β-lactams after adjusting for microbiological burden suggests a higher utilization relative to the prevalence of GNB with DTR.

Novel Beta Lactam Antibiotics for the Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Infections in Children: A Narrative Review

Infections due to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are increasingly prevalent in children and are associated with poor clinical outcomes, especially in critically ill patients. Novel beta lactam antibiotics, including ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam, and cefiderocol, have been released in recent years to face the emerging challenge of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacteria. Nonetheless, several novel agents lack pediatric indications approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicine Agency (EMA), leading to uncertain pediatric-specific treatment strategies and uncertain dosing regimens in the pediatric population. In this narrative review we have summarized the available clinical and pharmacological data, current limitations and future prospects of novel beta lactam antibiotics in the pediatric population.

In Vitro and In Vivo Synergism of Fosfomycin in Combination with Meropenem or Polymyxin B against KPC-2-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae Clinical Isolates

Fosfomycin disodium is a potential therapeutic option to manage difficult-to-treat infections, especially when combined with other antimicrobials. In this study, we evaluated the activity of fosfomycin in combination with meropenem or polymyxin B against contemporaneous KPC-2-producing K. pneumoniae clinical isolates (KPC-KPN). Synergistic activity was assessed by checkerboard (CKA) and time-kill (TKA) assays. TKA was performed using serum peak and trough concentrations. The activity of these combinations was also assessed in the Galleria mellonella model. Biofilm disruption was assessed by the microtiter plate technique. CKA resulted in an 8- to 2048-fold decrease in meropenem MIC, restoring meropenem activity for 82.4% of the isolates when combined with fosfomycin. For the fosfomycin + polymyxin B combination, a 2- to 128-fold reduction in polymyxin B MIC was achieved, restoring polymyxin B activity for 47% of the isolates. TKA resulted in the synergism of fosfomycin + meropenem (3.0-6.7 log₁₀ CFU/mL decrease) and fosfomycin + polymyxin B (6.0-6.2 log₁₀ CFU/mL decrease) at peak concentrations. All larvae treated with fosfomycin + meropenem survived. Larvae survival rate was higher with fosfomycin monotherapy (95%) than that observed for fosfomycin + polymyxin B (75%) (p-value < 0.0001). Finally, a higher biofilm disruption was observed under exposure to fosfomycin + polymyxin B (2.4-3.4-fold reduction). In summary, we observed a synergistic effect of fosfomycin + meropenem and fosfomycin + polymyxin B combinations, in vitro and in vivo, against KPC-KPN, as well as biofilm disruption.

Role of nebulized colistin as a substitutive strategy against nosocomial pneumonia caused by CR-GNB in intensive care units: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Adverse reactions, especially nephrotoxicity, are great concerns of intravenous colistin treatment. The role of substitutive nebulized colistin in treating nosocomial pneumonia caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacterial (CR-GNB) in critically ill patients remains unknown.

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled patients with nosocomial pneumonia caused by colistin-susceptible CRGNB in the intensive care unit (ICU) without intravenous colistin treatment. Patients were categorized based on whether substitutive nebulized colistin was used alongside other intravenous antibiotics. Clinical responses and mortality rates were compared between the two groups in the original and propensity score (PS)-matched cohorts. This study aimed to investigate the clinical effectiveness of substitutive nebulized colistin in treatment outcomes of nosocomial pneumonia caused by CR-GNB. The impact of dosing strategy of nebulized colistin was also explored.

RESULTS

In total, 343 and 214 patients with and without substitutive nebulized colistin, respectively, were enrolled for analysis. In the PS-matched cohort, clinical failure rates on day 7 (22.6 vs. 42.6%, p = 0.001), day 14 (27.0 vs. 42.6%, p = 0.013), and day 28 (27.8 vs. 41.7%, p = 0.027) were significantly lower in patients with nebulized colistin. In multivariate analysis, nebulized colistin was an independent factor associated with lower day 14 clinical failure (Original cohort: adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.45, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.30-0.67; PS-matched cohort: aOR 0.48, 95% CI 0.27-0.87). There were no differences in clinical failure rate and mortality rate between patients receiving high (> 6 MIU/day) and low (≤ 6 MIU/day) dose nebulized colistin in the PS-matched cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

In ICU-admitted patients with nosocomial pneumonia caused by colistin-susceptible CRGNB, substitutive nebulized colistin was associated with better clinical outcomes.

Colistin Monotherapy versus Combination Therapy for Carbapenem-Resistant Organisms

BACKGROUND

Pneumonia and bloodstream infections (BSI) due to extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Acinetobacter baumannii, XDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are associated with high mortality rates, and therapeutic options remain limited. This trial assessed whether combination therapy with colistin and meropenem was superior to colistin monotherapy for the treatment of these infections.

METHODS

The OVERCOME (Colistin Monotherapy versus Combination Therapy) trial was an international, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. We randomly assigned participants to receive colistin (5 mg/kg once followed by 1.67 mg/kg every 8 hours) in combination with either meropenem (1000 mg every 8 hours) or matching placebo for the treatment of pneumonia and/or BSI caused by XDR A. baumannii, XDR P. aeruginosa, or CRE. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality, and secondary outcomes included clinical failure and microbiologic cure.

RESULTS

Between 2012 and 2020, a total of 464 participants were randomly assigned to treatment, and 423 eligible patients comprised the modified intention-to-treat population. A. baumannii was the predominant trial pathogen (78%) and pneumonia the most common index infection (70%). Most patients were in the intensive care unit at the time of enrollment (69%). There was no difference in mortality (43 vs. 37%; P=0.17), clinical failure (65 vs. 58%; difference, 6.8 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -3.1 to 16.6), microbiologic cure (65 vs. 60%; difference, 4.8 percentage points; 95% CI, -5.6 to 15.2), or adverse events (acute kidney injury, 52 vs. 49% [P=0.55]; hypersensitivity reaction, 1 vs. 3% [P=0.22]; and neurotoxicity, 5 vs. 2% [P=0.29]) between patients receiving monotherapy and combination therapy, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy with colistin and meropenem was not superior to colistin monotherapy for the treatment of pneumonia or BSI caused by these pathogens. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases protocol 10-0065; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01597973.).

Evaluation of the inoculum effect of new antibiotics against carbapenem-resistant enterobacterales

OBJECTIVES

New antibiotics have been developed to treat multidrug-resistant Enterobacterales. We evaluated the impact of the inoculum size on minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of recently commercialized antibiotics.

METHODS

We focused on 40 clinical carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales and evaluated the impact of the inoculum size on the MICs to cefiderocol and to new β-lactams/β-lactamase inhibitors (ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, imipenem-relebactam, and meropenem-vaborbactam) at usual and high inocula (105 and 107 CFU/mL, respectively).

RESULTS

At usual inoculum, 15% were resistant to cefiderocol (n = 6), 30% to meropenem-vaborbactam (n = 12), 42.5% to ceftazidime-avibactam (n = 17), 55% to imipenem-relebactam (n = 22), and 90% to ceftolozane-tazobactam (n = 36). At higher inoculum, a switch from susceptible to resistant category was observed for 88% (n = 30/34; CI, 71.6-96.2), 75% (n = 3/4; CI, 21.9-98.7), 72% (n = 13/18; CI, 46.4-89.3), 50% (n = 14/28; CI, 31.1-68.9), and 8.7% (n = 2/23; CI, 1.5-29.5) isolates regarding cefiderocol, ceftolozane-tazobactam, imipenem-relebactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, and ceftazidime-avibactam, respectively.

DISCUSSION

Cefiderocol and meropenem-vaborbactam were the most efficient against carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales at usual inoculum. When increasing inoculum to 107 CFU/mL, all of the molecules were impacted, particularly cefiderocol and imipenem-relebactam, while others, such as ceftazidime-avibactam, remain mildly affected. Our in vitro results deserved to be confirmed in vivo.

β-Lactam Resistance in Azospirillum baldaniorum Sp245 Is Mediated by Lytic Transglycosylase and β-Lactamase and Regulated by a Cascade of RpoE7→RpoH3 Sigma Factors

Bacterial resistance to β-lactam antibiotics is often mediated by β-lactamases and lytic transglycosylases. Azospirillum baldaniorum Sp245 is a plant-growth-promoting rhizobacterium that shows high levels of resistance to ampicillin. Investigating the molecular basis of ampicillin resistance and its regulation in A. baldaniorum Sp245, we found that a gene encoding lytic transglycosylase (Ltg1) is organized divergently from a gene encoding an extracytoplasmic function (ECF) σ factor (RpoE7) in its genome. Inactivation of rpoE7 in A. baldaniorum Sp245 led to increased ability to form cell-cell aggregates and produce exopolysaccharides and biofilm, suggesting that rpoE7 might contribute to antibiotic resistance. Inactivation of ltg1 in A. baldaniorum Sp245, however, adversely affected its growth, indicating a requirement of Ltg1 for optimal growth. The expression of rpoE7, as well that of as ltg1, was positively regulated by RpoE7, and overexpression of RpoE7 conferred ampicillin sensitivity to both the rpoE7::km mutant and its parent. In addition, RpoE7 negatively regulated the expression of a gene encoding a β-lactamase (bla1). Out of the 5 paralogs of RpoH encoded in the genome of A. baldaniorum Sp245, RpoH3 played major roles in conferring ampicillin sensitivity and in the downregulation of bla1. The expression of rpoH3 was positively regulated by RpoE7. Collectively, these observations reveal a novel regulatory cascade of RpoE7-RpoH3 σ factors that negatively regulates ampicillin resistance in A. baldaniorum Sp245 by controlling the expression of a β-lactamase and a lytic transglycosylase. In the absence of a cognate anti-sigma factor, addressing how the activity of RpoE7 is regulated by β-lactams will unravel new mechanisms of regulation of β-lactam resistance in bacteria. IMPORTANCE Antimicrobial resistance is a global health problem that requires a better understanding of the mechanisms that bacteria use to resist antibiotics. Bacteria inhabiting the plant rhizosphere are a potential source of antibiotic resistance, but their mechanisms controlling antibiotic resistance are poorly understood. A. baldaniorum Sp245 is a rhizobacterium that is known for its characteristic resistance to ampicillin. Here, we show that an AmpC-type β-lactamase and a lytic transglycosylase mediate resistance to ampicillin in A. baldaniorum Sp245. While the gene encoding lytic transglycosylase is positively regulated by an ECF σ-factor (RpoE7), a cascade of RpoE7 and RpoH3 σ factors negatively regulates the expression of β-lactamase. This is the first evidence showing involvement of a regulatory cascade of σ factors in the regulation of ampicillin resistance in a rhizobacterium.

The Role of Colistin in the Era of New β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations

With the current crisis related to the emergence of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB), classical treatment approaches with so-called “old-fashion antibiotics” are generally unsatisfactory. Newly approved β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors (BLBLIs) should be considered as the first-line treatment options for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) infections. However, colistin can be prescribed for uncomplicated lower urinary tract infections caused by CR-GNB by relying on its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. Similarly, colistin can still be regarded as an alternative therapy for infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) until new and effective agents are approved. Using colistin in combination regimens (i.e., including at least two in vitro active agents) can be considered in CRAB infections, and CRE infections with high risk of mortality. In conclusion, new BLBLIs have largely replaced colistin for the treatment of CR-GNB infections. Nevertheless, colistin may be needed for the treatment of CRAB infections and in the setting where the new BLBLIs are currently unavailable. In addition, with the advent of rapid diagnostic methods and novel antimicrobials, the application of personalized medicine has gained significant importance in the treatment of CRE infections.

A novel combination therapy for multidrug resistant pathogens using chitosan nanoparticles loaded with β-lactam antibiotics and β-lactamase inhibitors

Antimicrobial resistance is one of the greatest global threats. Particularly, multidrug resistant extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing pathogens confer resistance to many commonly used medically important antibiotics, especially beta-lactam antibiotics. Here, we developed an innovative combination approach to therapy for multidrug resistant pathogens by encapsulating cephalosporin antibiotics and β-lactamase inhibitors with chitosan nanoparticles (CNAIs). The four combinations of CNAIs including two cephalosporin antibiotics (cefotaxime and ceftiofur) with two β-lactamase inhibitors (tazobactam and clavulanate) were engineered as water-oil-water emulsions. Four combinations of CNAIs showed efficient antimicrobial activity against multidrug resistant ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae. The CNAIs showed enhanced antimicrobial activity compared to naïve chitosan nanoparticles and to the combination of cephalosporin antibiotics and β-lactamase inhibitors. Furthermore, CNAIs attached on the bacterial surface changed the permeability to the outer membrane, resulting in cell damage that leads to cell death. Taken together, CNAIs have provided promising potential for treatment of diseases caused by critically important ESBL-producing multidrug resistant pathogens.

Ceftazidime-avibactam: are we safe from class A carbapenemase producers' infections?

Recently, new combinations of β-lactams and β-lactamase inhibitors became available, including ceftazidime-avibactam, and increased the ability to treat infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE). Despite the reduced time of clinical use, isolates expressing resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam have been reported, even during treatment or in patients with no previous contact with this drug. Here, we detailed review data on global ceftazidime-avibactam susceptibility, the mechanisms involved in resistance, and the molecular epidemiology of resistant isolates. Ceftazidime-avibactam susceptibility remains high (≥ 98.4%) among Enterobacterales worldwide, being lower among extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) producers and CRE. Alterations in class A β-lactamases are the major mechanism involved in ceftazidime-avibactam resistance, and mutations are mainly, but not exclusively, located in the Ω loop of these enzymes. Modifications in Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) 3 and KPC-2 have been observed by many authors, generating variants with different mutations, insertions, and/or deletions. Among these, the most commonly described is Asp179Tyr, both in KPC-3 (KPC-31 variant) and in KPC-2 (KPC-33 variant). Changes in membrane permeability and overexpression of efflux systems may also be associated with ceftazidime-avibactam resistance. Although several clones have been reported, ST258 with Asp179Tyr deserves special attention. Surveillance studies and rationale use are essential to retaining the activity of this and other antimicrobials against class A CRE.

Whole-genome sequencing and antimicrobial resistance analysis of multidrug-resistant Aeromonas veronii strain JC529 from a common carp

OBJECTIVES

Aeromonas veronii can cause infections in humans and a wide variety of aquatic and terrestrial animals as well as causing serious economic losses in aquaculture worldwide. Aeromonas veronii strain JC529 was isolated from an infected common carp in a fish pond in Jilin Province. In this study, we identified the multidrug resistance genes and traced the source of the strain in order to lay the foundation for research on the resistance mechanisms of other Aeromonas isolates.

METHODS

The isolated strain was sequenced using PacBio RS II and Illumina HiSeq 4000 platforms. Corrected reads were assembled using Celera and Falcon software and genes were predicted using Glimmer software. Seven databases were used for general function annotation. Virulence factors and resistance genes were identified based on the core data set in the VFDB and ARDB databases. Concurrently, 68 publicly available A. veronii genomes (including A. veronii JC529) were compared to reveal the clustering relationship of JC529.

RESULTS

Aeromonas veronii strain JC529 has a circular chromosome of 4 834 659 bp with a GC content of 59.64%, including 4264 protein-coding genes, 2 prophages, 482 virulence factors and 27 antibiotic resistance genes, indicating that strain JC529 is a multidrug-resistant strain. The phylogenetic tree showed that strains JC529 and NS, PDB, AG5.28.6 and VCK1 appear to be inherited from a common ancestor and affect aquaculture in China and Greece.

CONCLUSION

Strain JC529 is a multidrug-resistant A. veronii strain and has been inherited from a common ancestor with Greece.

QPX7728, An Ultra-Broad-Spectrum B-Lactamase Inhibitor for Intravenous and Oral Therapy: Overview of Biochemical and Microbiological Characteristics

QPX7728 is a novel β-lactamase inhibitor (BLI) that belongs to a class of cyclic boronates. The first member of this class, vaborbactam, is a BLI in the recently approved Vabomere (meropenem-vaborbactam). In this paper we provide the overview of the biochemical, structural and microbiological studies that were recently conducted with QPX7728. We show that QPX7728 is an ultra-broad-spectrum β-lactamase inhibitor with the broadest spectrum of inhibition reported to date in a single BLI molecule; in addition to potent inhibition of clinically important serine β-lactamases, including Class A and D carbapenemases from Enterobacterales and notably, diverse Class D carbapenemases from Acinetobacter, it also inhibits many metallo β-lactamases. Importantly, it is minimally affected by general intrinsic resistance mechanisms such as efflux and porin mutations that impede entry of drugs into gram-negative bacteria. QPX7728 combinations with several intravenous (IV) β-lactam antibiotics shows broad coverage of Enterobacterales, Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, including strains that are resistant to other IV β-lactam-BLI combinations, e.g., ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, meropenem-vaborbactam and imipenem-relebactam that were recently approved for clinical use. Based on studies with P. aeruginosa, different partner β-lactams in combination with QPX7728 may be optimal for the coverage of susceptible organisms. This provides microbiological justification for a stand-alone BLI product for co-administration with different β-lactams. QPX7728 can also be delivered orally; thus, its ultra-broad β-lactamase inhibition spectrum and other features could be also applied to oral QPX7728-based combination products. Clinical development of QPX7728 has been initiated.

Pharmacokinetics of Non-β-Lactam β-Lactamase Inhibitors

The growing emergence of drug-resistant bacterial strains is an issue to treat severe infections, and many efforts have identified new pharmacological agents. The inhibitors of β-lactamases (BLI) have gained a prominent role in the safeguard of beta-lactams. In the last years, new β-lactam–BLI combinations have been registered or are still under clinical evaluation, demonstrating their effectiveness to treat complicated infections. It is also noteworthy that the pharmacokinetics of BLIs partly matches that of β-lactams companions, meaning that some clinical situations, as well as renal impairment and renal replacement therapies, may alter the disposition of both drugs. Common pharmacokinetic characteristics, linear pharmacokinetics across a wide range of doses, and known pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters may guide modifications of dosing regimens for both β-lactams and BLIs. However, comorbidities (i.e., burns, diabetes, cancer) and severe changes in individual pathological conditions (i.e., acute renal impairment, sepsis) could make dose adaptation difficult, because the impact of those factors on BLI pharmacokinetics is partly known. Therapeutic drug monitoring protocols may overcome those issues and offer strategies to personalize drug doses in the intensive care setting. Further prospective clinical trials are warranted to improve the use of BLIs and their β-lactam companions in severe and complicated infections.

Emergence of Resistance to Ceftazidime-Avibactam in a Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolate Producing Derepressed bla PDC in a Hollow-Fiber Infection Model

Ceftazidime (CAZ)-avibactam (AVI) is a β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination with activity against type A and type C β-lactamases. Resistance emergence has been seen, with multiple mechanisms accounting for the resistance. We performed four experiments in the dynamic hollow-fiber infection model, delineating the linkage between drug exposure and both the rate of bacterial kill and resistance emergence by all mechanisms. The Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolate had MICs of 1.0 mg/liter (CAZ) and 4 mg/liter (AVI). We demonstrated that the time at ≥4.0 mg/liter AVI was linked to the rate of bacterial kill. Linkage to resistance emergence/suppression was more complex. In one experiment in which CAZ and AVI administration was intermittent and continuous, respectively, and in which AVI was given in unitary steps from 1 to 8 mg/liter, AVI at up to 3 mg/liter allowed resistance emergence, whereas higher values did not. The threshold value was 3.72 mg/liter as a continuous infusion to counterselect resistance (AVI area under the concentration-time curve [AUC] of 89.3 mg · h/liter). The mechanism involved a 7-amino-acid deletion in the Ω-loop region of the Pseudomonas-derived cephalosporinase (PDC) β-lactamase. Further experiments in which CAZ and AVI were both administered intermittently with regimens above and below the AUC of 89.3 mg · h/liter resulted in resistance in the lower-exposure groups. Deletion mutants were not identified. Finally, in an experiment in which paired exposures as both continuous and intermittent infusions were performed, the lower value of 25 mg · h/liter by both profiles allowed selection of deletion mutants. Of the five instances in which these mutants were recovered, four had a continuous-infusion profile. Both continuous-infusion administration and low AVI AUC exposures have a role in selection of this mutation.

Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidance on the Treatment of Extended-Spectrum β-lactamase Producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with Difficult-to-Treat Resistance (DTR-P. aeruginosa)

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial-resistant infections are commonly encountered in US hospitals and result in significant morbidity and mortality. This guidance document provides recommendations for the treatment of infections caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR-P. aeruginosa).

METHODS

A panel of 6 infectious diseases specialists with expertise in managing antimicrobial-resistant infections formulated common questions regarding the treatment of ESBL-E, CRE, and DTR-P. aeruginosa infections. Based on review of the published literature and clinical experience, the panel provide recommendations and associated rationale for each recommendation. Because of significant differences in the molecular epidemiology of resistance and the availability of specific anti-infective agents globally, this document focuses on treatment of antimicrobial-resistant infections in the United States.

RESULTS

Approaches to empiric treatment selection, duration of therapy, and other management considerations are briefly discussed. The majority of guidance focuses on preferred and alternative treatment recommendations for antimicrobial-resistant infections, assuming that the causative organism has been identified and antibiotic susceptibility testing results are known. Treatment recommendations apply to both adults and children.

CONCLUSIONS

The field of antimicrobial resistance is dynamic and rapidly evolving, and the treatment of antimicrobial-resistant infections will continue to challenge clinicians. This guidance document is current as of 17 September 2020. Updates to this guidance document will occur periodically as new data emerge. Furthermore, the panel will expand recommendations to include other problematic gram-negative pathogens in future versions. The most current version of the guidance including the date of publication can be found at www.idsociety.org/practice-guideline/amr-guidance/.

Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidance on the Treatment of Extended-Spectrum β-lactamase Producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with Difficult-to-Treat Resistance (DTR-P. aeruginosa)

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial-resistant infections are commonly encountered in US hospitals and result in significant morbidity and mortality. This guidance document provides recommendations for the treatment of infections caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR-P. aeruginosa).

METHODS

A panel of 6 infectious diseases specialists with expertise in managing antimicrobial-resistant infections formulated common questions regarding the treatment of ESBL-E, CRE, and DTR-P. aeruginosa infections. Based on review of the published literature and clinical experience, the panel provide recommendations and associated rationale for each recommendation. Because of significant differences in the molecular epidemiology of resistance and the availability of specific anti-infective agents globally, this document focuses on treatment of antimicrobial-resistant infections in the United States.

RESULTS

Approaches to empiric treatment selection, duration of therapy, and other management considerations are briefly discussed. The majority of guidance focuses on preferred and alternative treatment recommendations for antimicrobial-resistant infections, assuming that the causative organism has been identified and antibiotic susceptibility testing results are known. Treatment recommendations apply to both adults and children.

CONCLUSIONS

The field of antimicrobial resistance is dynamic and rapidly evolving, and the treatment of antimicrobial-resistant infections will continue to challenge clinicians. This guidance document is current as of 17 September 2020. Updates to this guidance document will occur periodically as new data emerge. Furthermore, the panel will expand recommendations to include other problematic gram-negative pathogens in future versions. The most current version of the guidance including the date of publication can be found at www.idsociety.org/practice-guideline/amr-guidance/.

Novel Beta-Lactam/Beta-Lactamase Plus Metronidazole vs Carbapenem for Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background

Complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs) remain a leading cause of death in surgical wards, in which antibiotic treatment is crucial. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors (BL/BLIs) in combination with metronidazole and carbapenems in the treatment of cIAIs.

Methods

A comprehensive search of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed using Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library, which compared the efficacy and safety of novel BL/BLIs and carbapenems for the treatment of cIAIs.

Results

Six RCTs consisting of 2254 patients were included. The meta-analysis showed that novel BL/BLIs in combination with metronidazole had a lower clinical success rate (risk difference [RD], -0.05; 95% CI, -0.07 to -0.02; I ² = 0%) and a lower microbiological success rate (RD, -0.04; 95% CI, -0.08 to -0.00; I ² = 0%). No difference was found between the 2 groups in incidence of adverse events (RD, 0.02; 95% CI, -0.01 to 0.06; I ² = 0%), serious adverse events (SAEs; RD, 0.01; 95% CI, -0.02 to 0.03; I ² = 0%), or mortality (RD, 0.01; 95% CI, -0.00 to 0.02). However, ceftazidime/avibactam had a higher risk of vomiting (RD, 0.03; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.05; I ² = 47%), and the ceftolozane/tazobactam subgroup showed a higher incidence of SAEs (RD, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.03).

Conclusions

The efficacy of novel BL/BLIs in combination with metronidazole was not as high as that of carbapenems. Although no significant differences were found with respect to overall adverse events, SAEs, or mortality, the novel BL/BLIs has a higher risk of vomiting. We still need to be cautious about the clinical application of a new anti-infective combination.

Trial registration

PROSPERO ID: 42020166061.

New cephalosporins for the treatment of pneumonia in internal medicine wards

The burden of hospital admission for pneumonia in internal medicine wards may not be underestimated; otherwise, cases of pneumonia are a frequent indication for antimicrobial prescriptions. Community- and hospital-acquired pneumonia are characterized by high healthcare costs, morbidity and non-negligible rates of fatality. The overcoming prevalence of resistant gram-negative and positive bacteria (e.g., methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, penicillin and ceftriaxone-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae, extended-spectrum β-lactamases and carbapenemases producing Enterobacteriaceae) has made the most of the first-line agents ineffective for treating lower respiratory tract infections. A broad-spectrum of activity, favourable pulmonary penetration, harmlessness and avoiding in some cases a combination therapy, characterise new cephalosporins such as ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftobiprole, ceftazidime/avibactam and ceftaroline. We aimed to summarise the role and place in therapy of new cephalosporins in community- and hospital-acquired pneumonia within the setting of internal medicine wards. The “universal pneumonia antibiotic strategy” is no longer acceptable for treating lung infections. Antimicrobial therapy should be individualized considering local antimicrobial resistance and epidemiology, the stage of the illness and potential host factors predisposing to a high risk for specific pathogens.

Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections in Children

Carbapenem-resistant organisms (CRO) are a major global public health threat. Enterobacterales hydrolyze almost all β-lactams through carbapenemase production. Infections caused by CRO are challenging to treat due to the limited number of antimicrobial options. This leads to significant morbidity and mortality. Over the last few years, several new antibiotics effective against CRO have been approved. Some of them (e.g., plazomicin or imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam) are currently approved for use only by adults; others (e.g., ceftazidime-avibactam) have recently been approved for use by children. Recommendations for antibiotic therapy of CRO infections in pediatric patients are based on evidence mainly from adult studies. The availability of pediatric pharmacokinetic and safety data is the cornerstone to broaden the use of proposed agents in adults to the pediatric population. This article provides a comprehensive review of the current knowledge regarding infections caused by CRO with a focus on children, which includes epidemiology, risk factors, outcomes, and antimicrobial therapy management, with particular attention being given to new antibiotics.

Ceftazidime/Avibactam and Ceftolozane/Tazobactam for Multidrug-Resistant Gram Negatives in Patients with Hematological Malignancies: Current Experiences

Patients suffering from hematological malignancies are at high risk for severe infections, including in particular bloodstream infections, which represent one of the most frequent life-threatening complications for these patients, with reported mortality rates reaching 40%. Furthermore, a worrisome increase in antimicrobial resistance of Gram-negative bacteria (e.g., cephalosporin- and/or carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa) involved in severe infectious complications among patients with hematological malignancies has been reported during the last years. The two novel combination of cephalosporins and β-lactamase inhibitors, ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam, were recently approved for treatment of complicated intra-abdominal and urinary tract infections and nosocomial pneumonia and display activity against several MDR Gram-negative strains. Although not specifically approved for neutropenic and/or cancer patients, these drugs are used in this setting due to increasing rates of infections caused by MDR Gram-negative bacteria. The aim of this review is to describe the actual evidence from scientific literature about the "real-life" use of these two novel drugs in patients with hematological malignancies and infections caused by MDR Gram-negative bacteria.