Emerging Technologies in Flow Diverters and Stents for Cerebrovascular Diseases

Wearable Transmitter Coil Design for Inductive Wireless Power Transfer to Implantable Devices

Wireless endovascular sensors and stimulators are emerging biomedical technologies for applications such as endovascular pressure monitoring, hyperthermia, and neural stimulations. Recently, coil-shaped stents have been proposed for inductive power transfer to endovascular devices using the stent as a receiver. However, less work has been done on the external transmitter components, so the maximum power transferable remains unknown. In this work, we design and evaluate a wearable transmitter coil that allows 50 mW power transfer in simulation.Clinical Relevance-This allows more accurate measurements and precise control of endovascular devices.

Fast Transition from Open Surgery to Endovascular Treatment of Unruptured Anterior Communicating Artery Aneurysms-A Retrospective Analysis of 128 Patients

OBJECTIVE

Anterior communicating artery aneurysms (ACoAAs) are challenging to treat both surgically and endovascularly. In this study, we evaluate the treatment-related morbidity and clinical outcome of microsurgical clipping and endovascular treatment for a consecutive series of unruptured ACoAAs while the treatment paradigm was in transition from surgical to endovascular first.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed clinical and radiologic data of adult patients who underwent microsurgical clipping or endovascular treatment of an unruptured ACoAA at a high-volume academic neurovascular center (Helsinki University Hospital) during 2012-2019. During this period, a transition from microsurgical clipping to endovascular treatment took place. Regarding outcome, we focused on treatment-related complications, discharge-to-home rates, functional performance (modified Rankin Scale score), and obliteration rates.

RESULTS

Of 128 treated ACoAAs, 81 (64%) were treated surgically and 47 (36%) endovascularly. There was no difference in major complications, intracranial hemorrhagic complications or ischemic complications, discharge-to-home rates, or functional performance between the surgically and endovascularly treated patients. With time, a decrease in major complications was observed in the surgical cases (from 29% to 17%), whereas the major complication rate increased in the endovascularly patients (from 0% to 25%). Cerebral ischemia was the most frequent complication in both groups. The risk for permanent neurologic deficit remained low in both groups (9% for endovascular and 5% for surgery).

CONCLUSIONS

We did not find any major differences regarding complications and outcomes after the treatment paradigm shift from clipping to endovascular of unruptured ACoAAs. Prospective studies evaluating durability of treatments are needed to compare overall effectiveness.

Endovascular treatment of vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms : a 20-year institutional experience

BACKGROUND

The ideal treatment for unruptured vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms (VADAs) and ruptured dominant VADAs remains controversial. We report our experience in the management and endovascular treatment of patients with VADAs.

METHODS

Patients treated endovascularly for intradural VADAs at a single institution from January 1, 1999, to December 31, 2019, were retrospectively reviewed. Primary neurological outcomes were assessed using modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores, with mRS >2 considered a poor neurological outcome. Additionally, any worsening (increase) in the mRS score from the preoperative neurological examination was considered a poor outcome.

RESULTS

Ninety-one patients of mean (SD) age 53 (11.6) years (48 (53%) men) underwent endovascular treatment for VADAs. Fifty-four patients (59%) presented with ruptured VADAs and 44 VADAs (48%) involved the dominant vertebral artery. Forty-seven patients (51%) were treated with vessel sacrifice of the parent artery, 29 (32%) with flow diversion devices (FDDs), and 15 (17%) with stent-assisted coil embolization (stent/coil). Rates of procedural complications and retreatment were significantly higher with stent/coil treatment (complications 4/15; retreatment 6/15) than with vessel sacrifice (complications 1/47; retreatment 2/47) or FDD (complications 2/29; retreatment 4/29) (p=0.008 and p=0.002, respectively). Of 37 patients with unruptured VADAs treated, only two (5%) had mRS scores >2 on follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Endovascular FDD treatment of VADAs appears to be associated with lower retreatment and complication rates than stenting/coiling, although further study is required for confirmation. Endovascular treatment of unruptured VADAs was safe and was associated with favorable angiographic and neurological outcomes.

Delayed rupture of intracranial aneurysms after placement of intra-luminal flow diverter

BACKGROUND

Though flow diverter is a safe and efficient modality, some patients can experience delayed aneurysmal rupture. The mechanism of delayed rupture is still obscure to us.

METHODS

We performed a systematic search in the PubMed database for patients with delayed rupture of intracranial aneurysms after flow diverter placement.

RESULTS

A total of 36 articles reporting on 60 patients were included in the final analysis. Of the 49 patients with description of presenting symptoms, six (12.2%) patients were incidentally diagnosed, 39 (87.8%) patients were admitted for aneurysmal rupture or mass effect. Multiple flow diverters were used in 38.3% (18/47) of the patients. Coil assistance was applied in 13.0% (7/54) of the patients. Delayed aneurysmal rupture led to intracranial hemorrhage or carotid-cavernous sinus fistula (CCF) in 76.8% (43/56) and 23.2% (13/56) of the patients, respectively. Of the 55 patients with description of outcome, 14 (25.5%) patients achieved good recovery, one (1.8%) patient was severely disabled, 40 (72.7%) patients died. All of the patients in the CCF group survived and experienced good recovery.

CONCLUSION

Increased intra-aneurysmal pressure, destabilization of the aneurysm wall by intra-aneurysmal thrombus, persistent residual intra-aneurysmal flow, characteristics of the specific aneurysm, and mechanical injury by the flow diverter might conjointly contribute to the final delayed rupture. There has been no established preventive measure to decrease the incidence of delayed rupture yet. The treatment and outcome depend on the presentation of delayed rupture. Patients presenting with aneurysm-related intracranial hemorrhage have a dismal outcome. Those presenting with CCFs usually have a satisfactory recovery.

The Evolution of Flow-Diverting Stents for Cerebral Aneurysms; Historical Review, Modern Application, Complications, and Future Direction

In spite of the developing endovascular era, large (15–25 mm) and giant (>25 mm) wide-neck cerebral aneurysms remained technically challenging. Intracranial flow-diverting stents (FDS) were developed to address these challenges by targeting aneurysm hemodynamics to promote aneurysm occlusion. In 2011, the first FDS approved for use in the United States market. Shortly thereafter, the Pipeline of Uncoilable or Failed Aneurysms (PUFS) study was published demonstrating high efficacy and a similar complication profile to other intracranial stents. The initial FDA instructions for use (IFU) limited its use to patients 22 years old or older with wide-necked large or giant aneurysms of the internal carotid artery (ICA) from the petrous segment to superior hypophyseal artery/ophthalmic segment. Expanded IFU was tested in the Prospective Study on Embolization of Intracranial Aneurysms with PipelineTM Embolization Device (PREMIER) trial. With further post-approval clinical data, the United States FDA expanded the IFU to include patients with small or medium, wide-necked saccular or fusiform aneurysms from the petrous ICA to the ICA terminus. However, IFU is more restrictive in South Korea than in United States. Several systematic reviews and meta-analyses have sought to evaluate the overall efficacy of FDS for the treatment of cerebral aneurysms and consistently identify FDS as an effective technique for the treatment of aneurysms broadly with complication rates similar to other traditional techniques. A growing body of literature has demonstrated high efficacy of FDS for small aneurysms; distal artery aneurysms; non-saccular aneurysms posterior circulation aneurysms and complication rates similar to traditional techniques. In the short interval since the Pipeline Embolization Device was first introduced, FDS has been firmly entrenched as a powerful tool in the endovascular armamentarium. As new FDS are developed, established FDS are refined, and delivery systems are improved the uses for FDS will only expand further. Researchers continue to work to optimize the mechanical characteristics of the FDS themselves, aiming to optimize deploy ability and efficacy. With expanded use for small to medium aneurysms and posterior circulation aneurysms, FDS technology is firmly entrenched as a powerful tool to treat challenging aneurysms, both primarily and as an adjunct to coil embolization. With the aforementioned advances, the ease of FDS deployment will improve and complication rates will be further minimized. This will only further establish FDS deployment as a key strategy in the treatment of cerebral aneurysms.

FRED Italian Registry: a multicenter experience with the flow re-direction endoluminal device for intracranial aneurysms

OBJECTIVE

The introduction of flow-diverter devices (FDDs) has revolutionized the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Here the authors present their Italian multicenter experience using the flow re-direction endoluminal device (FRED) in the treatment of cerebral aneurysms, evaluating both short- and long-term safety and efficacy of this device.

METHODS

Between February 2013 and December 2014, 169 consecutive aneurysms treated using FRED in 166 patients were entered into this study across 30 Italian centers. Data collected included patient demographics, aneurysm location and characteristics, baseline angiography, adverse event and serious adverse event information, morbidity and mortality rates, and pre- and posttreatment modified Rankin Scale scores, as well as angiographic and cross-sectional CT/MRI follow-up at 3-6 months and/or 12-24 months per institutional standard of care. All images were reviewed and adjudicated by an independent core lab.

RESULTS

Of the 169 lesions initially entered into the study, 4 were later determined to be extracranial or nonaneurysmal by the core lab and were excluded, leaving 165 aneurysms in 162 patients treated in 163 procedures. Ninety-one (56.2%) patients were asymptomatic with aneurysms found incidentally. Of the 165 aneurysms, 150 (90.9%) were unruptured. One hundred thirty-four (81.2%) were saccular, 27 (16.4%) were fusiform/dissecting, and the remaining 4 (2.4%) were blister-like. One hundred thirty-seven (83.0%) arose from the anterior circulation.FRED deployment was impossible in 2/163 (1.2%) cases, and in an additional 4 cases (2.5%) the device was misdeployed. Overall mortality and morbidity rates were 4.3% and 7.3%, respectively, with rates of mortality and morbidity potentially related to FRED of up to 2.4% and 6.2%, respectively. Neuroimaging follow-up at 3-6 months showed complete or nearly complete occlusion of the aneurysm in 94% of cases, increasing to 96% at 12-24 months' follow-up. Aneurysmal sac shrinkage was observed in 78% of assessable aneurysms.

CONCLUSIONS

This preliminary experience using FRED for endovascular treatment of complex unruptured and ruptured aneurysms showed a high safety and efficacy profile that is comparable to those of other FDDs currently in use.

Covered stenting and transcatheter embolization of splenic artery aneurysms in diabetic patients: A review of endovascular treatment of visceral artery aneurysms in the current era

Diabetes mellitus is associated with both microvascular and macrovascular complications, which can result in visceral aneurysms as for example splenic artery aneurysms: in their management, an endovascular treatment, less invasive than surgery, is generally preferred. Endovascular treatment of splenic artery aneurysms can be based either on covered stenting (CS) or transcatheter embolization (TE). CS generally allows aneurysm exclusion with vessel preservation, while TE usually determines target artery occlusion with potential risk of distal ischemia. We performed a review of the existing literature on endovascular treatment of visceral artery aneurysms (VAAs) and psudoaneurysms (VAPAs) in the current era.

Nickel-Related Adverse Reactions in the Treatment of Cerebral Aneurysms: A Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Nickel is the most common metal allergen and predominantly affects women. It is also the ubiquitous component in the alloys used to manufacture intracranial devices for aneurysm treatments, including aneurysm clips, self-expanding stents, flow-diverting stents, and endosaccular occlusion devices. Adverse events related to nickel allergy after deployment of such devices are uncommon but can be severe, resulting in dilemmas in the choice of treatment strategies and devices in managing nickel-sensitive patients with intracranial aneurysms.

METHODS

A literature search was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines to identify studies reporting on nickel-related adverse events in patients being treated for cerebral aneurysm. The materials of the culprit devices, clinical presentation, histological features, and treatments were reviewed. Clinical considerations and management options for nickel allergy patients were evaluated.

RESULTS

Nickel is a major component of the cobalt alloy used in aneurysm clips and also of nitinol, which is commonly used in flow diverters and intracranial stents. Our literature review identified 9 articles reporting 10 unique cases of nickel-related adverse events after aneurysm treatment. Five of the cases occurred after aneurysm clipping, and the other 5 were attributed to endovascular devices. Two patients presented with dermatologic manifestations and 8 with neurologic manifestations, including cerebral edema and cerebritis.

CONCLUSIONS

Neurologic complications related to nickel in cerebral aneurysm treatments are rare but remain concern owing to the high prevalence of nickel allergy in the population. Surgeons and interventionists should consider the metal allergy history and its potential clinical significance in managing nickel-allergic patients with aneurysms.