Toxicity of treatment for neoplastic meningitis

Leptomeningeal metastasis from solid tumors

Central nervous system (CNS) metastasis from systemic cancers can involve the brain parenchyma, leptomeninges (pia, subarachnoid space and arachnoid mater), and dura. Leptomeningeal metastases (LM), also known by different terms including neoplastic meningitis and carcinomatous meningitis, occur in both solid tumors and hematologic malignancies. This review will focus exclusively on LM arising from solid tumors with a goal of providing the reader an understanding of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, prognostication, current management and future directions.

Leptomeningeal metastasis

Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) results from dissemination of cancer cells to both the leptomeninges (pia and arachnoid) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) compartment. Breast cancer, lung cancer, and melanoma are the most common solid tumors that cause LM. Recent approval of more active anticancer therapies has resulted in improvement in survival that is partly responsible for an increased incidence of LM. Neurologic deficits, once manifest, are mostly irreversible, and often have a significant impact on patient quality of life. LM-directed therapy is based on symptom palliation, circumscribed use of neurosurgery, limited field radiotherapy, intra-CSF and systemic therapies. Novel methods of detecting LM include detection of CSF circulating tumor cells and tumor cell-free DNA. A recent international guideline for a standardization of response assessment in LM may improve cross-trial comparisons as well as within-trial evaluation of treatment. An increasing number of retrospective studies suggest that molecular-targeted therapy, such as EGFR and ALK inhibitors in lung cancer, trastuzumab in HER2+ breast cancer, and BRAF inhibitors in melanoma, may be effective as part of the multidisciplinary management of LM. Prospective randomized trials with standardized response assessment are needed to further validate these preliminary findings.

Best practices for the use of intracerebroventricular drug delivery devices

For decades, intracerebroventricular (ICV), or intraventricular, devices have been used in the treatment of a broad range of pediatric and adult central nervous system (CNS) disorders. Due to the limited permeability of the blood brain barrier, diseases with CNS involvement may require direct administration of drugs into the brain to achieve full therapeutic effect. A recent comprehensive literature review on the clinical use and complications of ICV drug delivery revealed that device-associated complication rates are variable, and may be as high as 33% for non-infectious complications and 27% for infectious complications. The variability in reported safety outcomes may be driven by a lack of consensus on best practices of device use. Numerous studies have demonstrated that employing strict aseptic techniques and following stringent protocols can dramatically reduce complications. Key practices to be considered in facilitating the safe, long-term use of these devices are presented.

Intracerebroventricular Delivery as a Safe, Long-Term Route of Drug Administration

Intrathecal delivery methods have been used for many decades to treat a broad range of central nervous system disorders. A literature review demonstrated that intracerebroventricular route is an established and well-tolerated method for prolonged central nervous system drug delivery in pediatric and adult populations. Intracerebroventricular devices were present in patients from one to 7156 days. The number of punctures per device ranged from 2 to 280. Noninfectious complication rates per patient (range, 1.0% to 33.0%) were similar to infectious complication rates (0.0% to 27.0%). Clinician experience and training and the use of strict aseptic techniques have been shown to reduce the frequency of complications.

Carcinomatous meningitis: Leptomeningeal metastases in solid tumors

Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) results from metastatic spread of cancer to the leptomeninges, giving rise to central nervous system dysfunction. Breast cancer, lung cancer, and melanoma are the most frequent causes of LM among solid tumors in adults. An early diagnosis of LM, before fixed neurologic deficits are manifest, permits earlier and potentially more effective treatment, thus leading to a better quality of life in patients so affected. Apart from a clinical suspicion of LM, diagnosis is dependent upon demonstration of cancer in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or radiographic manifestations as revealed by neuraxis imaging. Potentially of use, though not commonly employed, today are use of biomarkers and protein profiling in the CSF. Symptomatic treatment is directed at pain including headache, nausea, and vomiting, whereas more specific LM-directed therapies include intra-CSF chemotherapy, systemic chemotherapy, and site-specific radiotherapy. A special emphasis in the review discusses novel agents including targeted therapies, that may be promising in the future management of LM. These new therapies include anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors erlotinib and gefitinib in nonsmall cell lung cancer, anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody trastuzumab in breast cancer, anti-CTLA4 ipilimumab and anti-BRAF tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as vermurafenib in melanoma, and the antivascular endothelial growth factor monoclonal antibody bevacizumab are currently under investigation in patients with LM. Challenges of managing patients with LM are manifold and include determining the appropriate patients for treatment as well as the optimal route of administration of intra-CSF drug therapy.

Neurotoxicity of intra-CSF liposomal cytarabine (DepoCyt) administered for the treatment of leptomeningeal metastases: a retrospective case series

Treatment of leptomeningeal metastasis (LMD) remains challenging due to advanced systemic disease at presentation and limited treatment options. All patients underwent standard pre-treatment LMD evaluation including CSF assessment (cytology or flow cytometry), brain and spine MR imaging, and radioisotope CSF flow study. DepoCyt (liposomal cytarabine) was administered intraventricularly (n = 80) or intralumbar (n = 40) at 50 mg every 2 weeks × 4 and then every 4 weeks × 6 in responding patients. Dexamethasone (4 mg orally twice per day × 5 days) was co-administered with each DepoCyt treatment. Patients were seen with each DepoCyt treatment and assessed for toxicity. 120 adult patients [median age 51 years (range 33-68)] with LMD were treated with DepoCyt. DepoCyt Common Toxicity Criteria ≥ Grade 3 neurotoxicity was seen in 60 cycles (11.5 %) in 28 patients (23.3 %). Toxicity included bacterial meningitis (3.75 % of ventricular treatments: 0 % of lumbar treatments); chemical meningitis (17.5:15 %); communicating hydrocephalus (3.75:5 %); conus medullaris/cauda equina syndrome (5:5 %); decreased visual acuity (5:2.5 %); encephalopathy (5:5 %); leukoencephalopathy (7.5:2.5 %); myelopathy (2.5:2.5 %); radiculopathy (1.25:5 %); and seizures (1.25:2.5 %). Distribution of toxicity was similar regardless of route of administration (ventricular vs. lumbar). Toxicities were transient in 34 episodes (57 %) and permanent in 26 (43 %). There were no treatment-related deaths however 20 treatment-related toxicities (32.2 %) required hospitalization. In this retrospective case series, DepoCyt is generally well tolerated however a subset of patients (12.5 %) not easily identified pre-treatment, develop serious treatment-related neurological complications that may be persistent and impact quality of life.

Successful treatment of leptomeningeal metastases from breast cancer using the combination of trastuzumab and capecitabine: a case report

We report a case of metastatic breast cancer with leptomeninges and multiple bone metastases that showed an excellent response to the combination of trastuzumab and capecitabine; therapeutic effect was evaluated by MRI at follow-up. A 44-year-old woman underwent modified radical mastectomy in February 1997. In April 2003, a tumor at the right basis cerebri and multiple bone metastases were noted, and in October 2003, she underwent enucleation of the tumor. Histopathologically, the tumor was consistent with a basal skull metastasis from breast cancer. In March 2004, the patient began to experience pain, weakness, and paresthesia of both legs. She was diagnosed, with leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) from breast cancer using MRI. In December 2005, the combination of trastuzumab and capecitabine administered as sixth-line treatment was very effective for LM. Although it is generally very difficult to diagnose LM and assess the therapeutic effect with MRI, in this case, it was possible. To our knowledge, there has been no report in the literature describing the combination of trastuzumab and capecitabine for LM from breast cancer. Although the mechanism underlying the efficacy of this combination is still unknown, the treatment would be worth trying because of its few side effects in extensively treated patients with LM from breast cancer. To confirm the antitumor efficacy of trastuzumab and capecitabine, however, further investigations are required.

Contrast-Enhancing Meningeal Lesions Are Associated with Longer Survival in Breast Cancer-Related Leptomeningeal Metastasis

BACKGROUND: Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is a devastating complication of advanced cancer. Despite aggressive therapy survival is very poor. METHODS: Data of all breast cancer patients with LM were retrospectively analyzed (n = 27). RESULTS: Median survival was 9 weeks. Patients with contrast-enhancing meningeal lesions (n = 11) detected by MRI had a median survival of 33 weeks versus 8 weeks for patients without contrast-enhancing lesions (n = 9; p = 0.0407). Patients who received systemic chemotherapy (n = 18) had a median survival of 15 weeks versus 7 weeks (n = 9; p = 0.0106). Patients undergoing radiotherapy (n = 8) had a median survival of 17 weeks as compared to 5 weeks for patients without radiotherapy (n = 18; p = 0.0188). In a multiple Cox regression analysis, lack of systemic therapy (hazard ratio, HR 89.5; p = 0.002) and negative hormone receptor status (HR 4.2; p = 0.027) emerged as significant main risk factors, together with contrast-enhancing lesion as effect modifier for systemic therapy (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhancing meningeal lesions, systemic therapy, and radiotherapy were significantly associated with longer survival. Patients with contrast-enhancing lesions who were treated systemically had the longest survival. Evidence is increasing that systemic therapy plays an important role and should be applied in breast cancer patients with LM.

Chemotherapy in neoplastic meningitis

Neoplastic meningitis (NM) is the result of the diffuse or multifocal localization of cancer cells in the cerebral spinal fluid (CSF). NM is more often a late complication of solid tumor or lymphoproliferative malignancies. At present, the goal of therapeutic strategies is palliative and the evaluation of high or low risk is important in identifying which patients could benefit from aggressive treatments such as radiation therapy and chemotherapy. Given that NM is a cancer complication that can spread throughout the entire subarachnoid space, chemotherapy, whether intrathecal or systemic, is currently considered the best treatment option, but optimal treatment is still controversial. This review summarizes intrathecal and systemic chemotherapeutic options in the treatment of NM and the related toxicities.

Leptomeningeal metastases from solid malignancy: a review

Leptomeningeal metastases (LMM) consist of diffuse involvement of the leptomeninges by infiltrating cancer cells. In solid tumors, the most frequent primary sites are lung and breast cancers, two tumors where the incidence of LMM is apparently increasing. Careful neurological examination is required to demonstrate multifocal involvement of the central nervous system (CNS), cranial nerves, and spinal roots, which constitute the clinical hallmark of the disease. Cerebro-spinal fluid (CSF) analysis is almost always abnormal but only a positive cytology or demonstration of intrathecal synthesis of tumor markers is diagnostic. T1-weighted gadolinium-enhanced sequence of the entire neuraxis (brain and spine) plays an important role in supporting the diagnosis, demonstrating the involved sites and guiding treatment. Radionuclide CSF flow studies detect CSF compartmentalization and are useful for treatment planning. Standard therapy relies mainly on focal irradiation and intrathecal or systemic chemotherapy. Studies using other therapeutic approaches such as new biological or cytotoxic compounds are ongoing. The overall prognosis remains grim and quality of life should remain the priority when deciding which treatment option to apply. However, a sub-group of patients, tentatively defined here, may benefit from an aggressive treatment.

Potential role of chemo-radiation with oral capecitabine in a breast cancer patient with central nervous system relapse

A 54-year-old woman underwent mastectomy and axillary lymph node dissection for infiltrating ductal carcinoma with multiple lymph node involvement. The patient received adriamycin 60 mg/m(2) and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2) (AC) followed by weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m(2) and external irradiation to the local lymph node regions as adjuvant treatment. After 1 year and 5 months, the patient suffered her first recurrence, developing multiple brain and meningeal metastases. CNS involvement was well controlled by oral capecitabine (2400 mg twice daily, on days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle) and external whole brain irradiation of 50 Gy with minimal toxicity. We suggest that capecitabine contributed to the favorable clinical course in this patient and believe that, as an oral agent, this drug may benefit patients with CNS metastases of breast cancer by allowing home-based therapy.

Diagnosis and management of central nervous system metastases from breast cancer

The brain, cranial nerves, leptomeninges, spinal cord, and eye compose the central nervous system (CNS) and are at risk for the development of metastases from breast cancer. Such metastases are diagnosed on the basis of clinical suspicion and substantiated by neuroimaging, resection when indicated, and sampling of cerebrospinal fluid when leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is suspected. Treatment is aimed at palliation of symptoms and preservation of neurologic function. Historically, conventional radiation therapy has been the mainstay of palliative treatment for brain, cranial nerve, spinal cord, and ocular metastases. However, additional treatment options for brain metastases have been brought about by technological advances in surgery to resect brain metastases, and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to focally irradiate metastases, both of which have been substantiated by data from randomized trials. Ongoing research is aimed at refining criteria to select which patients with brain metastases should undergo surgery and SRS and how these focal therapies should be optimally integrated with whole-brain radiotherapy. Therapy for LM must carefully balance the potential risks and perceived benefits associated with CNS-directed therapies. Despite advances in neuroimaging, surgery, and radiation therapy, novel treatments are needed to improve the effectiveness of treatments for CNS metastases, especially LM, while reducing attendant neurotoxicity.

Central nervous system toxicity from cancer treatment

Neurologic complications of cancer therapy are an increasingly important concern in patient management. Improvements in systemic therapies and increasing use of local treatments to target such specific tumor sites as brain or leptomeningeal metastases have resulted in increased incidence of treatment toxicity in the central nervous system (CNS). Recognition of specific treatment-related toxicities, and more importantly, differentiation of treatment toxicity from reversible causes of neurologic dysfunction, are critical. This article reviews the evaluation and treatment of major CNS toxicities related to cancer treatment and conditions that present with similar signs and symptoms. The three most common of these, alterations in cognition and consciousness, seizures, and cerebellar dysfunction, are discussed. Prompt recognition of these problems and their causes will have an impact on patient care in all areas of oncology.