1
|
Barak MM. Cortical and Trabecular Bone Modeling and Implications for Bone Functional Adaptation in the Mammalian Tibia. Bioengineering (Basel) 2024; 11:514. [PMID: 38790379 PMCID: PMC11118124 DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11050514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2024] [Revised: 05/14/2024] [Accepted: 05/17/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Bone modeling involves the addition of bone material through osteoblast-mediated deposition or the removal of bone material via osteoclast-mediated resorption in response to perceived changes in loads by osteocytes. This process is characterized by the independent occurrence of deposition and resorption, which can take place simultaneously at different locations within the bone due to variations in stress levels across its different regions. The principle of bone functional adaptation states that cortical and trabecular bone tissues will respond to mechanical stimuli by adjusting (i.e., bone modeling) their morphology and architecture to mechanically improve their mechanical function in line with the habitual in vivo loading direction. This principle is relevant to various research areas, such as the development of improved orthopedic implants, preventative medicine for osteopenic elderly patients, and the investigation of locomotion behavior in extinct species. In the present review, the mammalian tibia is used as an example to explore cortical and trabecular bone modeling and to examine its implications for the functional adaptation of bones. Following a short introduction and an exposition on characteristics of mechanical stimuli that influence bone modeling, a detailed critical appraisal of the literature on cortical and trabecular bone modeling and bone functional adaptation is given. By synthesizing key findings from studies involving small mammals (rodents), large mammals, and humans, it is shown that examining both cortical and trabecular bone structures is essential for understanding bone functional adaptation. A combined approach can provide a more comprehensive understanding of this significant physiological phenomenon, as each structure contributes uniquely to the phenomenon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meir M Barak
- Department of Veterinary Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Long Island University, Brookville, NY 11548, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bavil AY, Eghan-Acquah E, Diamond LE, Barrett R, Carty CP, Barzan M, Nasseri A, Lloyd DG, Saxby DJ, Feih S. Effect of different constraining boundary conditions on simulated femoral stresses and strains during gait. Sci Rep 2024; 14:10808. [PMID: 38734763 PMCID: PMC11088641 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-61305-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Finite element analysis (FEA) is commonly used in orthopaedic research to estimate localised tissue stresses and strains. A variety of boundary conditions have been proposed for isolated femur analysis, but it remains unclear how these assumed constraints influence FEA predictions of bone biomechanics. This study compared the femoral head deflection (FHD), stresses, and strains elicited under four commonly used boundary conditions (fixed knee, mid-shaft constraint, springs, and isostatic methods) and benchmarked these mechanics against the gold standard inertia relief method for normal and pathological femurs (extreme anteversion and retroversion, coxa vara, and coxa valga). Simulations were performed for the stance phase of walking with the applied femoral loading determined from patient-specific neuromusculoskeletal models. Due to unrealistic biomechanics observed for the commonly used boundary conditions, we propose a novel biomechanical constraint method to generate physiological femur biomechanics. The biomechanical method yielded FHD (< 1 mm), strains (approaching 1000 µε), and stresses (< 60 MPa), which were consistent with physiological observations and similar to predictions from the inertia relief method (average coefficient of determination = 0.97, average normalized root mean square error = 0.17). Our results highlight the superior performance of the biomechanical method compared to current methods of constraint for both healthy and pathological femurs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alireza Y Bavil
- Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
- School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
- Advanced Design and Prototyping Technologies (ADaPT) Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
| | - Emmanuel Eghan-Acquah
- Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
- School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
- Advanced Design and Prototyping Technologies (ADaPT) Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
| | - Laura E Diamond
- Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
- School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
- Advanced Design and Prototyping Technologies (ADaPT) Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
| | - Rod Barrett
- Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
- School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
- Advanced Design and Prototyping Technologies (ADaPT) Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
| | - Christopher P Carty
- Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
- School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
- Advanced Design and Prototyping Technologies (ADaPT) Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
| | - Martina Barzan
- Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
- School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
- Advanced Design and Prototyping Technologies (ADaPT) Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
| | - Azadeh Nasseri
- Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
- School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
- Advanced Design and Prototyping Technologies (ADaPT) Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
| | - David G Lloyd
- Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
- School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
- Advanced Design and Prototyping Technologies (ADaPT) Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
| | - David J Saxby
- Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.
- School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.
- Advanced Design and Prototyping Technologies (ADaPT) Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.
| | - Stefanie Feih
- Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.
- Advanced Design and Prototyping Technologies (ADaPT) Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.
- School of Engineering and Built Environment, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hijazi KM, Dixon SJ, Armstrong JE, Rizkalla AS. Titanium Alloy Implants with Lattice Structures for Mandibular Reconstruction. MATERIALS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2023; 17:140. [PMID: 38203994 PMCID: PMC10779528 DOI: 10.3390/ma17010140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2023] [Revised: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Abstract
In recent years, the field of mandibular reconstruction has made great strides in terms of hardware innovations and their clinical applications. There has been considerable interest in using computer-aided design, finite element modelling, and additive manufacturing techniques to build patient-specific surgical implants. Moreover, lattice implants can mimic mandibular bone's mechanical and structural properties. This article reviews current approaches for mandibular reconstruction, their applications, and their drawbacks. Then, we discuss the potential of mandibular devices with lattice structures, their development and applications, and the challenges for their use in clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khaled M. Hijazi
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada
- Bone and Joint Institute, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6G 2V4, Canada
| | - S. Jeffrey Dixon
- Bone and Joint Institute, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6G 2V4, Canada
- Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 5C1, Canada
| | - Jerrold E. Armstrong
- Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI 48202, USA
| | - Amin S. Rizkalla
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada
- Bone and Joint Institute, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6G 2V4, Canada
- Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 5C1, Canada
- Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 5B9, Canada
| |
Collapse
|