Pharmacologic treatment of neuropathic pain

Effects of alkaloids on peripheral neuropathic pain: a review

Neuropathic pain is a debilitating pathological pain condition with a great therapeutic challenge in clinical practice. Currently used analgesics produce deleterious side effects. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate alternative medicines for neuropathic pain. Chinese herbal medicines have been widely used in treating intractable pain. Compelling evidence revealed that the bioactive alkaloids of Chinese herbal medicines stand out in developing novel drugs for neuropathic pain due to multiple targets and satisfactory efficacy. In this review, we summarize the recent progress in the research of analgesic effects of 20 alkaloids components for peripheral neuropathic pain and highlight the potential underlying molecular mechanisms. We also point out the opportunities and challenges of the current studies and shed light on further in-depth pharmacological and toxicological studies of these bioactive alkaloids. In conclusion, the alkaloids hold broad prospects and have the potentials to be novel drugs for treating neuropathic pain. This review provides a theoretical basis for further applying some alkaloids in clinical trials and developing new drugs of neuropathic pain.

Is there a reasonable excuse for not providing post-operative analgesia when using animal models of peripheral neuropathic pain for research purposes?

Introduction

The induction of neuropathic pain-like behaviors in rodents often requires surgical intervention. This engages acute nociceptive signaling events that contribute to pain and stress post-operatively that from a welfare perspective demands peri-operative analgesic treatment. However, a large number of researchers avoid providing such care based largely on anecdotal opinions that it might interfere with model pathophysiology in the longer term.

Objectives

To investigate effects of various peri-operative analgesic regimens encapsulating different mechanisms and duration of action, on the development of post-operative stress/welfare and pain-like behaviors in the Spared Nerve Injury (SNI)-model of neuropathic pain.

Methods

Starting on the day of surgery, male Sprague-Dawley rats were administered either vehicle (s.c.), carprofen (5.0mg/kg, s.c.), buprenorphine (0.1mg/kg s.c. or 1.0mg/kg p.o. in Nutella^®), lidocaine/bupivacaine mixture (local irrigation) or a combination of all analgesics, with coverage from a single administration, and up to 72 hours. Post-operative stress and recovery were assessed using welfare parameters, bodyweight, food-consumption, and fecal corticosterone, and hindpaw mechanical allodynia was tested for assessing development of neuropathic pain for 28 days.

Results

None of the analgesic regimes compromised the development of mechanical allodynia. Unexpectedly, the combined treatment with 0.1mg/kg s.c. buprenorphine and carprofen for 72 hours and local irrigation with lidocaine/bupivacaine, caused severe adverse effects with peritonitis. This was not observed when the combination included a lower dose of buprenorphine (0.05mg/kg, s.c.), or when buprenorphine was administered alone (0.1mg/kg s.c. or 1.0mg/kg p.o.) for 72 hours. An elevated rate of wound dehiscence was observed especially in the combined treatment groups, underlining the need for balanced analgesia. Repeated buprenorphine injections had positive effects on body weight the first day after surgery, but depressive effects on food intake and body weight later during the first week.

Conclusion

Post-operative analgesia does not appear to affect established neuropathic hypersensitivity outcome in the SNI model.

Symptomatic Hyponatremia in Patients on Oxcarbazepine Therapy for the Treatment of Neuropathic Pain

Oxcarbazepine is an FDA approved anticonvulsant medication that has also been used clinically as a treatment for chronic neuropathic pain. Hyponatremia is occasionally seen with the older anticonvulsant carbamazepine, and oxcarbazepine is a derivative of that older drug. Two cases of hyponatremia associated with oxcarbazepine are reported and suggestions for monitoring for and managing this effect are provided.

Neuropathic pain in dogs and cats: if only they could tell us if they hurt

Neuropathic pain is difficult to diagnose in veterinary patients because they are unable to verbalize their pain. By assuming that neuropathic pain may exist based on the history of events that each patient has experienced, a focused client history and neurologic examination may identify a lesion resulting in persistent or spontaneous pain. Once neuropathic pain is diagnosed, a trial analgesic or acupuncture session(s) should be prescribed with instructions for owners to observe behavior. Dosing of the analgesic can be titrated to the patient's needs while avoiding adverse effects. When a particular analgesic may be ineffectual, an alternate class should be tried. As research into the neurobiologic mechanisms of neuropathic pain continues, specific therapies for its management should eventually appear in the human clinical setting and subsequently be investigated for veterinary clinical use.

Midazolam administration reverses thermal hyperalgesia and prevents gamma-aminobutyric acid transporter loss in a rodent model of neuropathic pain

BACKGROUND

Loss of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) inhibition in the spinal dorsal horn may contribute to neuropathic pain. Here we examined whether systemic administration of the benzodiazepine midazolam would alleviate thermal hyperalgesia due to chronic constriction injury (CCI) of the sciatic nerve.

METHODS

Hyperalgesia was evaluated with the thermal paw withdrawal latency test before, and 3 and 7 days after CCI. Animals randomly received, via osmotic minipump infusion, midazolam (2.0 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1)), flumazenil (0.004 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1)), midazolam plus flumazenil at the same doses, or saline (0.01 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1)). Four groups of sham-operated rats (surgery without nerve ligation) received matched treatments. Levels of the GABA transporter 1 (GAT-1) in the lumbar spinal dorsal horn were estimated using western immunoblots 7 days after surgery.

RESULTS

Saline-treated CCI rats developed thermal hyperalgesia on Day 3 with a more pronounced effect on Day 7. Continuous midazolam infusion prevented thermal hyperalgesia on both days. The antihyperalgesic effect of midazolam was reversed by the coadministration of flumazenil. Infusion of flumazenil alone had no effect on the thermal hyperalgesia in CCI rats. Sham-operated rats treated with saline, midazolam, or midazolam plus flumazenil exhibited no thermal hyperalgesia. Unexpectedly, thermal paw withdrawal latency in sham animals treated with flumazenil alone was significantly decreased. Changes in GAT-1 levels paralleled the behavior. Midazolam prevented the CCI-associated decreases, and flumazenil reversed midazolam's effect. Flumazenil alone did not modify GAT-1 levels in CCI animals but in sham animals the transporter levels were significantly reduced.

CONCLUSIONS

GABA inhibition plays an important role in neuropathic pain. Continuous systemic benzodiazepine administration may prove effective in alleviating neuropathic pain.

A Descriptive Review of Neuropathic-Like Pain After Burn Injury

This study reviews the natural history of neuropathic-like pain after burn injury. We undertook a retrospective chart review during a 24-month period of patients treated at an outpatient burn center. The medical records of patients with neuropathic-like pain complaints, including the sensation of pins and needles, burning, stabbing, shooting, or "electric" sensations, were included for analysis. Medical and demographic data were collected. We identified 72 patients for inclusion in the study. The age was 44 +/- 2 years (mean +/- SEM), and TBSA burned was 18 +/- 3%. The first complaint of neuropathic-like symptoms was at 4.3 +/- 0.5 months after injury. Documentation of improvement in the symptoms occurred at 7.0 +/- 0.8 months. Symptoms persisted for 13.1 +/- 2.2 months after the injury. Patients were followed for 14.5 +/- 2.2 months. Documented initial pain severity score was 7 +/- 1 of 10. Typical exacerbating factors included temperature change, dependent position, light touch, and weight-bearing activities. Common alleviating factors included rest, massage, compression garment use, and elevation. Treatment regimens often included gabapentin (38%) and steroid injections (21%). Hypertrophic scarring (43%), pruritus (40%), and psychiatric diagnoses (36%) were common associated problems. There is a patterned natural history for neuropathic-like pain after burn injury. This clinical entity involves significant pain complaints and persists, on average, for greater than 1 year after injury, which underscores the importance of long-term outpatient care after burn injury. Furthermore, an understanding of the natural history will assist clinicians in prognosticating and caring for burn survivors with pain after wound closure.

Pharmacological evaluation of the selective spinal nerve ligation model of neuropathic pain in the rat

Rodent models of neuropathic pain are used to investigate the underlying mechanisms of pain associated with damage to peripheral nerves and to evaluate the efficacy of novel compounds. However, few models have been adequately characterized and the validity of many models remains unclear. The present experiment examined the activity of known anti-allodynic compounds in the L5 spinal nerve ligation (SNL) model of peripheral mononeuropathy in the rat, a modified version of the L5/L6 SNL model [S.H. Kim, J.M. Chung, An experimental model for peripheral neuropathy produced by segmental spinal nerve ligation in the rat, Pain 50 (1992) 355-363]. Tactile sensitivity was measured 7-21 days post-surgery using von Frey monofilaments before and following treatment with gabapentin (30, 60 and 120 mg/kg), morphine (1, 3 and 6 mg/kg), amitriptyline (1.5, 3 and 10 mg/kg), fluoxetine (3, 10 and 30 mg/kg), WIN55,212-2 (0.5, 1 and 2.5 mg/kg), indomethacin (1 and 5 mg/kg) or U-50,488H (3 and 6 mg/kg). Compared to sham-operated control animals, L5 SNL animals displayed significant tactile allodynia in the ipsilateral hindpaw that was completely reversed by treatment with gabapentin, morphine, and WIN55,212-2, partially reversed by amitriptyline and fluoxetine, and unaffected by U-50,488H or indomethacin. The robust effects of the non-selective cannabinoid receptor agonist WIN55,212-2 and morphine support reports in the literature that systemic cannabinoid receptor agonists and opioids are active in neuropathic pain. These results suggest that the L5 SNL model can be utilized to determine the anti-allodynic activity of novel compounds.

A treatment algorithm for neuropathic pain

BACKGROUND

Neuropathic pain is a chronic pain syndrome caused by drug-, disease-, or injury-induced damage or destruction of sensory neurons within the dorsal root ganglia of the peripheral nervous system. Characteristic clinical symptoms include the feeling of pins and needles; burning, shooting, and/or stabbing pain with or without throbbing; and numbness. Neuronal hyperexcitability represents the hallmark cellular mechanism involved in the underlying pathophysiology of neuropathic pain. Although the primary goal is to alleviate pain, clinicians recognize that even the most appropriate treatment strategy may be, at best, only able to reduce pain to a more tolerable level.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this review is to propose a treatment algorithm for neuropathic pain that health care professionals can logically follow and adapt to the specific needs of each patient. The algorithm is intended to serve as a general guide to assist clinicians in optimizing available therapeutic options.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of the literature using the PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Toxnet databases was conducted to design and develop a novel treatment algorithm for neuropathic pain that encompasses agents from several drug classes, including antidepressants, antiepileptic drugs, topical antineuralgic agents, narcotics, and analgesics, as well as various treatment options for refractory cases.

RESULTS

Any of the agents in the first-line drug classes (tricyclic antidepressants, antiepileptic drugs, topical antineuralgics, analgesics) may be used as a starting point in the treatment of neuropathic pain. If a patient does not respond to treatment with at least 3 different agents within a drug class, agents from a second drug class may be tried. When all first-line options have been exhausted, narcotic analgesics or refractory treatment options may provide some benefit. Patients who do not respond to monotherapy with any of the first- or second-line agents may respond to combination therapy or may be candidates for referral to a pain clinic. Because the techniques used at pain clinics tend to be invasive, referrals to these clinics should be reserved for patients who are truly refractory to all forms of pharmacotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Neuropathic pain continues to be one of the most difficult pain conditions to treat. With the proposed algorithm, clinicians will have a framework from which to design a pain treatment protocol appropriate for each patient. The algorithm will also help streamline referrals to specialized pain clinics, thereby reducing waiting list times for patients who are truly refractory to traditional pharmacotherapy.

Pathophysiological activity in rat dorsal horn neurones in segments rostral to a chronic spinal cord injury

As a sequel of complete spinal cord injury (SCI), patients often develop chronic pain which is perceived at or just below the level of the lesion. Likewise, in animal models of SCI, spontaneous and evoked pain-related behaviour can be observed. In the present study, the hypothesis was tested that pain related behaviour after SCI in animals is at least partly due to neuronal hyperactivity in spinal segments rostral to the site of injury. In rats with a chronic transected spinal cord, the impulse activity of single dorsal horn neurones was recorded in two locations: (1) directly rostrally adjacent to the lesion, and (2) 2-3 segments more rostrally. Cord transections were made either at the thoracic or at the lumbar level. Sham-operated rats and rats which underwent no surgical interventions served as controls. Compared with both controls, in SCI animals the background activity of the neurones had a significantly higher level in both series. Often the activity showed a pathophysiological altered discharge pattern. Following SCI, there was a general increase in the mechanical responsiveness of neurones that were recorded 2-3 segments rostrally to the lesion. The results suggest that neuronal hyperactivity in spinal segments just rostral to the lesion may contribute to chronic spontaneous SCI pain. Further, there is some indication that the allodynia perceived in body regions near and above the level of the SCI may be due to increased responsiveness to weak stimuli of neurones located more rostrally to the lesion.

Gabapentin dosing for neuropathic pain: evidence from randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Pain is one of the most common reasons for seeking medical attention, and neuropathic pain is among the most common types of pain. Despite its prevalence, neuropathic pain is often underrecognized and inadequately treated. Many cases are refractory to the medications traditionally used for pain, such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Tricyclic antidepressants are considered first-line agents for neuropathic pain, but their use is limited by unwanted side effects and a risk of cardiovascular mortality.

OBJECTIVES

The goals of this article were to review data on the efficacy and tolerability of gabapentin in the treatment of neuropathic pain in adults and to determine the optimal dosing schedule.

METHODS

Randomized controlled studies of gabapentin for neuropathic pain were identified through a search of PubMed and MEDLINE from 1966 to the present using the search terms gabapentin, randomized, placebo, and pain. Abstracts of identified articles were screened for study size (>100 patients per treatment arm) and use of appropriate efficacy measures. A separate review based on information provided by the manufacturer of gabapentinaand clinical trial Web sites was conducted to ascertain whether there had been any other relevant industry- or government-sponsored trials. The manufacturer provided additional unpublshed study data.

RESULTS

Data from 5 randomized, placebo-controlled trials were included in the review, 1 of which has not yet been published. Gabapentin was effective in the treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy, postherpetic neuralgia, and other neuropathic pain syndromes. It relieved symptoms of allodynia, burning pain, shooting pain, and hyperesthesia. Adverse effects were typically mild to moderate and usually subsided within approximately 10 days from the initiation of treatment. Based on available data, it appears that treatment should be started at a dose of 900 mg/d (300 mg/d on day 1, 600 mg/d on day 2, and 900 mg/d on day 3). Additional titration to 1800 mg/d is recommended for greater efficacy. Doses up to 3600 mg/d may be needed in some patients. The effective dose should be individualized according to patient response and tolerability.

CONCLUSION

At doses of 1800 to 3600 mg/d, gabapentin was effective and well tolerated in the treatment of adults with neuropathic pain.

Spinal noradrenergic activation mediates allodynia reduction from an allosteric adenosine modulator in a rat model of neuropathic pain

Activation of adenosine A1 receptors by endogenous adenosine or synthetic agonists produces anti-nociception in animal models of acute pain and also reduces hypersensitivity in models of inflammatory and nerve-injury pain. Allosteric adenosine modulators facilitate adenosine agonist binding to the A1 receptor. The purpose of the current study was to examine the effect, mechanisms of action, and interaction with noradrenergic systems of intrathecal (i.t.) or oral administration of the allosteric adenosine modulator T62 in a rat model of neuropathic pain. A spinal nerve ligation rat model (SNL; ligation of left L5 and L6 spinal nerve roots) was used. One week after SNL surgery, an i.t. catheter was inserted. Withdrawal threshold to mechanical stimulation of the left hind paw was determined before and after surgery, confirming mechanical hypersensitivity. Oral or i.t. T62 reduced hypersensitivity induced by SNL. The effects of i.t. T62 were inhibited by i.t. injection of an A1 receptor antagonist and by an 2-adrenergic antagonist but not by an A2 adenosine receptor antagonist. Anti-dopamine hydroxylase (DH)-saporin treatment reduce spinal norepinephrine content by 97%, accompanied by an almost complete loss of DH immunoreactive axons in the spinal dorsal horn and neurons in the locus coeruleus. The effect of T62 was completely lost in animals treated with anti-DH-saporin. These data support the hypothesis that activation of the A1 receptor by the allosteric modulator, T62, produces anti-nociception via spinal noradrenergic activation.