1
|
Sampogna G, Caraci F, Carmassi C, Dell'Osso B, Ferrari S, Martinotti G, Sani G, Serafini G, Signorelli MS, Fiorillo A. Efficacy and tolerability of desvenlafaxine in the real-world treatment of patients with major depression: a narrative review and an expert opinion paper. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2023; 24:1511-1525. [PMID: 37450377 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2023.2237410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2023] [Revised: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 07/13/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common severe mental disorder, requiring a tailored and integrated treatment. Several approaches are available including different classes of antidepressants various psychotherapeutic approaches, and psychosocial interventions. The treatment plan for each patient with MDD should be differentiated on the basis of several clinical, personal, and contextual factors. AREAS COVERED Desvenlafaxine - a serotonine-noradrenergic reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) antidepressant - has been approved in the United States in 2008 for the treatment of MDD in adults, and has been recently rediscovered by clinicians due to its good side-effect profile and its clinical effectiveness. A narrative review on efficacy, tolerability and use of desvenlafaxine in clinical practice was carried out. The keywords: 'major depression', 'depression,' 'desvenlafaxine,' 'efficacy,' 'clinical efficacy,' 'side effects', 'tolerability,' 'elderly patients', 'consultation-liaison', 'menopausal', 'young people', 'adolescent' were entered in PubMed, ISI Web of Knowledge, Scopus and Medline. No time limit was fixed, the search strategy was implemented on May 10, 2023. EXPERT OPINION Desvenlafaxine should be listed among the optimal treatment strategies for managing people with MDD, whose main strengths are: 1) ease of dosing; 2) favorable safety and tolerability profile, 3) absence of sexual dysfunctions, weight gain and low rate of discontinuation symptoms; 4) low risk of drug-drug interactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaia Sampogna
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Filippo Caraci
- Department of Drug and Health Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
- Unit of Neuropharmacology and Translational Neurosciences, Oasi Research Institute-IRCCS, Troina, Italy
| | | | - Bernardo Dell'Osso
- Neuroscience Research Center, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences and Aldo Ravelli Center for Neurotechnology and Brain Therapeutic, University of Milan, Milano, Italy
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, USA
| | - Silvia Ferrari
- Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
- Dipartimento Ad attività Integrata di Salute Mentale E Dipendenze Patologiche, Azienda USL-IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Giovanni Martinotti
- Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, University "G. D'Annunzio" of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
| | - Gabriele Sani
- Institute of Psychiatry, Department of Neuroscience, Catholic University of the Sacred Hearth, Rome, Italy
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, and Maternal and Child Health, Psychiatry Section, University of Genoa, IRCCS, San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Gianluca Serafini
- Department of Psychiatry, Department of Neuroscience Head, Neck and Thorax, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Salvina Signorelli
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, AOU Policlinico Hospital, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Andrea Fiorillo
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vargas-Schaffer G, Steverman A, Potvin V. Monitoring Pharmacological Treatment in Patients With Chronic Noncancer Pain. Cureus 2021; 13:e20358. [PMID: 34912657 PMCID: PMC8666110 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.20358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Chronic pain has been not recognized as a chronic illness, and its far-reaching impacts are often ignored. Chronic noncancer pain (CNCP) is a chronic disease and health care professionals need recommendations on how to monitor treatments, patients and long-term side effects of the different medications used to control CNCP. CNCP patients make up a vulnerable population due to the various associated pathologies and the challenging socio-economic conditions experienced by many of these patients. CNCP is more common among older adults, females, cancer survivors, indigenous peoples, veterans, and populations affected by social inequities and discrimination. These social determinants can lead to a complex interplay between chronic pain, mental illness, and substance use disorders. Given these realities, long-term pharmacological and side effect surveillance is more complex. Follow-up of patients with CNCP is a challenge for physicians, and thus it is important to provide recommendations on how to monitor treatments and long-term side effects of the different medications used to control CNCP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grisell Vargas-Schaffer
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Pain Center Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montreal (CHUM), Montreal, CAN
| | - Allen Steverman
- Family Medicine, Pain Center Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montreal (CHUM), Montreal, CAN
| | - Veronique Potvin
- Anesthesiology, Pain Center Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montreal (CHUM), Montreal, CAN
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Salhofer-Polanyi S, Zebenholzer K, Berndl T, Kastrati K, Raab S, Schweitzer P, Stria T, Topic P, Wöber C. Medication overuse headache in 787 patients admitted for inpatient treatment over a period of 32 years. Cephalalgia 2020; 40:808-817. [PMID: 32153204 DOI: 10.1177/0333102420911210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Definitions of medication overuse headache have changed over time. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the clinical characteristics of medication overuse headache patients admitted for inpatient withdrawal therapy over a period of 32 years. METHODS We included all patients with medication overuse headache treated from 1 January 1984 to 31 December 2015. We obtained all data from the medical reports and defined three periods, P1 (1984-1993), P2 (1994-2003), and P3 (2004-2015). The p-value adjusted for multiple comparisons was set to 0.005. RESULTS Within 32 years, a total of 787 patients accounted for 904 admissions for MOH. From P1 to P3, the proportion of patients with preexisting migraine increased from 44.3% to 53.3% (chi2 = 9.0, p = 0.01) and that with preexisting tension-type headache decreased from 47.9% to 34.6% (chi2 = 9.3, p < 0.01). The median time since onset of headache and medication overuse headache decreased from 20 to 15 years (p < 0.001) and from 3 to 2 years (p < 0.001). The median cumulative number of single doses decreased from 120 to 90 per month (p = 0.002). Overuse of triptans, non-opioid analgesics, and opioids increased, whereas overuse of ergotamines decreased over time (p < 0.001 for all tests). The use of prophylactic medication before admission increased from 8.3% to 29.9% (chi2 = 89.5, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION This retrospective study in a large number of patients with medication overuse headache admitted for inpatient withdrawal therapy over a period of 32 years shows a trend towards changes in the preexisting headache type, a decrease in the time since onset of headache and medication overuse headache, a decrease in the number of drug doses used per month, changes in the type of drugs overused, and an increase in, but still low rate, of prophylactic medication prior to admission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine Salhofer-Polanyi
- Department of Neurology, Krankenhaus Hietzing mit Neurologischem Zentrum [General Hospital Hietzing with Neurological Center] Rosenhügel, Vienna, Austria
| | - Karin Zebenholzer
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Thomas Berndl
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Kastriot Kastrati
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Sandra Raab
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Tim Stria
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Pavao Topic
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Christian Wöber
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Molina KC, Fairman KA, Sclar DA. Concomitant use of opioid medications with triptans or serotonergic antidepressants in US office-based physician visits. DRUG HEALTHCARE AND PATIENT SAFETY 2018; 10:37-43. [PMID: 29760569 PMCID: PMC5937481 DOI: 10.2147/dhps.s151073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Background Opioids are not recommended for routine treatment of migraine because their benefits are outweighed by risks of medication overuse headache and abuse/dependence. A March 2016 US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) safety communication warned of the risk of serotonin syndrome from using opioids concomitantly with 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor agonists (triptans) or serotonergic antidepressants: selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs). Epidemiological information about co-prescribing of these medications is limited. The objective of this study was to estimate the nationwide prevalence of co-prescribing of an opioid with a serotonergic antidepressant and/or triptan in US office-based physician visits made by 1) all patients and 2) patients diagnosed with migraine. Methods National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) data were obtained for 2013 and 2014. Physician office visits that included the new or continued prescribing of ≥1 opioid medication with a triptan or an SSRI/SNRI were identified. Co-prescribed opioids were stratified by agent to determine the proportion of co-prescriptions with opioids posing a higher risk of serotonergic agonism (meperidine, tapentadol, and tramadol). Results Of an annualized mean 903.6 million office-based physician visits in 2013-2014, 17.7 million (2.0% of all US visits) resulted in the prescribing of ≥1 opioid medication with a triptan or an SSRI/SNRI. Opioid-SSRI/SNRI was co-prescribed in 16,044,721 visits, while opioid-triptan was co-prescribed in 1,622,827 visits. One-fifth of opioid co-prescribing was attributable to higher-risk opioids, predominantly tramadol (18.6% of opioid-SSRI/SNRI, 21.8% of opioid-triptan). Of 7,672,193 visits for patients diagnosed with migraine, 16.3% included opioid prescribing and 2.0% included co-prescribed opioid-triptan. Conclusion During a period approximately 2 years prior to an FDA warning about the risk of serotonin syndrome from opioid-SSRI/SNRI or opioid-triptan co-prescribing, use of these combinations was common in the USA. Studies on prescribing patterns following the March 2016 warning, and on the risk of serotonin syndrome associated with these co-prescriptions, are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyle C Molina
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Midwestern University College of Pharmacy-Glendale, Glendale, AZ, USA
| | - Kathleen A Fairman
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Midwestern University College of Pharmacy-Glendale, Glendale, AZ, USA
| | - David A Sclar
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Midwestern University College of Pharmacy-Glendale, Glendale, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rodieux F, Vutskits L, Posfay-Barbe KM, Habre W, Piguet V, Desmeules JA, Samer CF. When the Safe Alternative Is Not That Safe: Tramadol Prescribing in Children. Front Pharmacol 2018; 9:148. [PMID: 29556194 PMCID: PMC5844975 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2017] [Accepted: 02/13/2018] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Children represent a vulnerable population in which management of nociceptive pain is complex. Drug responses in children differ from adults due to age-related differences. Moreover, therapeutic choices are limited by the lack of indication for a number of analgesic drugs due to the challenge of conducting clinical trials in children. Furthermore the assessment of efficacy as well as tolerance may be complicated by children's inability to communicate properly. According to the World Health Organization, weak opioids such as tramadol and codeine, may be used in addition to paracetamol and ibuprofen for moderate nociceptive pain in both children and adults. However, codeine prescription has been restricted for the last 5 years in children because of the risk of fatal overdoses linked to the variable activity of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 which bioactivates codeine. Even though tramadol has been considered a safe alternative to codeine, it is well established that tramadol pharmacodynamic opioid effects, efficacy and safety, are also largely influenced by CYP2D6 activity. For this reason, the US Food and Drug Administration recently released a boxed warning regarding the use of tramadol in children. To provide safe and effective tramadol prescription in children, a personalized approach, with dose adaptation according to CYP2D6 activity, would certainly be the safest method. We therefore recommend this approach in children requiring chronic or recurrent nociceptive pain treatment with tramadol. In case of acute inpatients nociceptive pain management, prescribing tramadol at the minimal effective dose, in a child appropriate dosage form and after clear instructions are given to the parents, remains reasonable based on current data. In all other situations, morphine should be preferred for moderate to severe nociceptive pain conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frédérique Rodieux
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Intensive Care, Geneva University Hospitals, University of GenevaGeneva, Switzerland
| | - Laszlo Vutskits
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Intensive Care, Geneva University Hospitals, University of GenevaGeneva, Switzerland.,Department of Basic Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, University of GenevaGeneva, Switzerland.,Division of Anesthesiology, Unit for Pediatric Anesthesia, Children's Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva University Hospitals, University of GenevaGeneva, Switzerland
| | - Klara M Posfay-Barbe
- Pediatric Infectious Diseases Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Geneva, Geneva University Hospitals, University of GenevaGeneva, Switzerland
| | - Walid Habre
- Division of Anesthesiology, Unit for Pediatric Anesthesia, Children's Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva University Hospitals, University of GenevaGeneva, Switzerland.,Anesthesiological Investigations Unit, Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Intensive Care, Geneva University Hospitals, University of GenevaGeneva, Switzerland
| | - Valérie Piguet
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Intensive Care, Geneva University Hospitals, University of GenevaGeneva, Switzerland
| | - Jules A Desmeules
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Intensive Care, Geneva University Hospitals, University of GenevaGeneva, Switzerland.,School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Geneva, University of LausanneGeneva, Switzerland
| | - Caroline F Samer
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Intensive Care, Geneva University Hospitals, University of GenevaGeneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Psychiatric and physical conditions often coexist, and there is robust evidence that associates the frequency of depression with single and multiple physical conditions. More than half of patients with depression may have at least one chronic physical condition. Therefore, antidepressants are often used in cotherapy with other medications for the management of both psychiatric and chronic physical illnesses. The risk of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) is augmented by complex polypharmacy regimens and extended periods of treatment required, of which possible outcomes range from tolerability issues to lack of efficacy and serious adverse events. Optimal patient outcomes may be achieved through drug selection with minimal potential for DDIs. Desvenlafaxine is a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor approved for the treatment of adults with major depressive disorder. Pharmacokinetic studies of desvenlafaxine have shown a simple metabolic profile unique among antidepressants. This review examines the DDI profiles of antidepressants, particularly desvenlafaxine, in relation to drugs of different therapeutic areas. The summary and comparison of information available is meant to help clinicians in making informed decisions when using desvenlafaxine in patients with depression and comorbid chronic conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yvette Low
- Department of Pharmacy, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Graca Lima
- Global Medical Affairs, Asia-Pacific Region, Pfizer, Hong Kong
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
Nowadays, the delta opioid receptor (DOPr) represents a promising target for the treatment of chronic pain and emotional disorders. Despite the fact that they produce limited antinociceptive effects in healthy animals and in most acute pain models, DOPr agonists have shown efficacy in various chronic pain models. In this chapter, we review the progresses that have been made over the last decades in understanding the role played by DOPr in the control of pain. More specifically, the distribution of DOPr within the central nervous system and along pain pathways is presented. We also summarize the literature supporting a role for DOPr in acute, tonic, and chronic pain models, as well as the mechanisms regulating its activity under specific conditions. Finally, novel compounds that have make their way to clinical trials are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khaled Abdallah
- Département de pharmacologie-physiologie, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
- Institut de pharmacologie de Sherbrooke, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
- Faculté de médecine et des sciences de la santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
- Centre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Louis Gendron
- Département de pharmacologie-physiologie, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
- Institut de pharmacologie de Sherbrooke, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
- Faculté de médecine et des sciences de la santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
- Centre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
- Département d'anesthésiologie, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
- Quebec Pain Research Network, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pergolizzi JV, LeQuang JA, Berger GK, Raffa RB. The Basic Pharmacology of Opioids Informs the Opioid Discourse about Misuse and Abuse: A Review. Pain Ther 2017; 6:1-16. [PMID: 28341939 PMCID: PMC5447545 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-017-0068-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2017] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Morphine and other opioids are widely used to manage moderate to severe acute pain syndromes, such as pain associated with trauma or postoperative pain, and they have been used to manage chronic pain, even chronic nonmalignant pain. However, recent years have seen a renewed recognition of the potential for overuse, misuse, and abuse of opioids. Therefore, prescribing opioids is challenging for healthcare providers in that clinical effectiveness must be balanced against negative outcomes-with the possibility that neither are achieved perfectly. The current discourse about the dual 'epidemics' of under-treatment of legitimate pain and the over-prescription of opioids is clouded by inadequate or inaccurate understanding of opioid drugs and the endogenous pain pathways with which they interact. An understanding of the basic pharmacology of opioids helps inform the clinician and other stakeholders about these simultaneously under- and over-used agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Robert B Raffa
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Najjar M, Hall T, Estupinan B. Metoclopramide for Acute Migraine Treatment in the Emergency Department: An Effective Alternative to Opioids. Cureus 2017; 9:e1181. [PMID: 28533997 PMCID: PMC5438233 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.1181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
In light of recent warnings by the United States (US) Surgeon General and Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines for recommending more prudent use of opioid narcotics, the search for a non-opioid alternative for aborting acute migraines is particularly relevant. The CDC also estimates the prevalence of opioid dependence may be as high as 26% among patients prescribed opioids for chronic pain, not due to cancer, in the primary care setting. Given such staggering data, it is imperative that we, as caretakers, not foster opioid dependence but rather continue to investigate non-opioid therapies for the management of acute migraines in the emergent care settings. Our literature review demonstrates that metoclopramide should be used more frequently as first-line therapy for an acute migraine over opioids. The use of opioids specifically has been discouraged as migraine treatment by the American Headache Society citing “insufficient evidence” as the main reason. Metoclopramide, specifically using the 10 mg dose, has been cited as “highly likely to be effective” by the same guidelines. Another major issue with opioids is the growing potential for abuse, thus minimizing the use of these drugs for only special circumstances would be beneficial overall.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mejdi Najjar
- College of Medicine, University of Central Florida College of Medicine
| | - Tyler Hall
- College of Medicine, University of Central Florida College of Medicine
| | - Blanca Estupinan
- College of Medicine, University of Central Florida College of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Chronic pain is usually managed by various pharmacotherapies after exhausting the conservative modalities such as over-the-counter choices. The goal of this review is to investigate current state of opioids and non-opioid medication overuse that includes NSAIDs, skeletal muscle relaxants, antidepressants, membrane stabilization agents, and benzodiazepine. How to minimize medication overuse and achieve better outcome in chronic pain management? RECENT FINDINGS Although antidepressants and membrane stabilization agents contribute to the crucial components for neuromodulation, opioids were frequently designated as a rescue remedy in chronic pain since adjunct analgesics usually do not provide instantaneous relief. The updated CDC guideline for prescribing opioids has gained widespread attention via media exposure. Both patients and prescribers are alerted to respond to the opioid epidemic and numerous complications. However, there has been overuse of non-opioid adjunct analgesics that caused significant adverse effects in addition to concurrent opioid consumption. It is a common practice to extrapolate the WHO three-step analgesic ladder for cancer pain to apply in non-cancer pain that emphasizes solely on pharmacologic therapy which may result in overuse and escalation of opioids in non-cancer pain. There has been promising progress in non-pharmacologic therapies such as biofeedback, complementary, and alternative medicine to facilitate pain control instead of dependency on pharmacologic therapies. This review article presents the current state of medication overuse in chronic pain and proposes precaution to balance the risk and benefit ratio. It may serve as a premier for future study on clinical pathway for comprehensive chronic pain management and reduce medication overuse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric S Hsu
- Comprehensive Pain Center, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|