1
|
Manchikanti L, Knezevic NN, Knezevic E, Pasupuleti R, Kaye AD, Sanapati MR, Hirsch JA. Efficacy of Percutaneous Adhesiolysis in Managing Low Back and Lower Extremity Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Pain Ther 2023:10.1007/s40122-023-00508-y. [PMID: 37227685 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-023-00508-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/26/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Chronic refractory low back and lower extremity pain recalcitrant to conservative management and epidural injections secondary to postsurgery syndrome, spinal stenosis, and disc herniation are sometimes managed with percutaneous adhesiolysis. Consequently, this systematic review and meta-analysis was undertaken to assess the efficacy of percutaneous adhesiolysis in managing low back and lower extremity pain. METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) utilizing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist was performed. A comprehensive literature search of multiple databases from 1966 to July 2022, including manual searches of the bibliography of known review articles was performed. Quality assessment of the included trials, meta-analysis, and best evidence synthesis was performed. The primary outcome measure was a significant reduction in pain (short term up to 6 months and long term more than 6 months). RESULTS The search identified 26 publications, with 9 trials meeting the inclusion criteria. The results of dual-arm and single-arm analyses showed significant improvement in pain and function at 12 months. Opioid consumption was also significantly reduced at 6 months with dual-arm analysis, whereas single-arm analysis showed a significant decrease from baseline to treatment at the 3-, 6-, and 12-month analyses. At 1 year follow-up, seven of seven trials were positive for improvements in pain relief, function, and diminution of opioid use. DISCUSSION Based on the present systematic review of nine RCTs, the evidence level is I to II, with moderate to strong recommendation for percutaneous adhesiolysis in managing low back and lower extremity pain. The limitations of the evidence include paucity of literature, lack of placebo-controlled trials, and the majority of the trials studying post lumbar surgery syndrome. CONCLUSION The evidence is level I to II or strong to moderate based on five high-quality and two moderate-quality RCTs, with 1 year follow-up that percutaneous adhesiolysis is efficacious in the treatment of chronic refractory low back and lower extremity pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laxmaiah Manchikanti
- Pain Management Centers of America, 67 Lakeview Drive, Paducah, KY, 42001, USA.
- Pain Management Centers of America, Evansville, IN, USA.
| | - Nebojsa Nick Knezevic
- Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center and College of Medicine, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Emilija Knezevic
- College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA
| | | | - Alan D Kaye
- LSU Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Ochsner Shreveport Hospital and Interventional Pain Clinic Feist-Wieller Cancer Center, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Mahendra R Sanapati
- Pain Management Centers of America, 67 Lakeview Drive, Paducah, KY, 42001, USA
- Pain Management Centers of America, Evansville, IN, USA
| | - Joshua A Hirsch
- Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Manchikanti L, Kaye AD, Latchaw RE, Sanapati MR, Pampati V, Gharibo CG, Albers SL, Hirsch JA. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Utilization Patterns of Facet Joint Interventions in Managing Spinal Pain in a Medicare Population. Pain Ther 2023; 12:505-527. [PMID: 36723804 PMCID: PMC9890434 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-023-00476-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2022] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in major disruptions in all aspects of human life including a decline of medical services utilized during 2020. An analysis of the impact of COVID-19 pandemic showed an 18.7% reduction in utilization patterns of interventional techniques in managing chronic pain in the Medicare population from 2019 to 2020. However, specific changes in utilization patterns of facet joint interventions have not been studied. Thus, we sought to assess the utilization patterns including an update of facet joint interventions from 2018 to 2020, with analysis of the impact of COVID-19 pandemic in managing chronic spinal pain utilizing facet joint interventions in the fee-for-service Medicare population of the United States. METHODS The present investigation was designed to assess utilization patterns and variables of facet joint interventions, in managing chronic spinal pain from 2010 to 2020 in the fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare population in the United States (US), and how the COVID-19 pandemic impacted these utilization patterns. Data for the analysis were obtained from the master database from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) physician/supplier procedure summary from 2000 to 2020. RESULTS Results of this analysis showed significant impact of COVID-19 with overall decrease of 18.5% of all facet joint interventions per 100,000 Medicare population compared to 20.2 and 20.5% decrease for lumbar and cervical facet joint injections, 15 and 13.1% decrease per 100,000 Medicare population of lumbosacral and cervicothoracic facet joint neurolysis procedures. The results are significant in that comparative analysis from 2000 to 2010 and 2010 to 2019 showing an annual increase of 14.4 vs. 2.2%, illustrating a decelerating pattern. There were also significant growth patterns noted with decreases in facet joint injections and nerve blocks compared to facet joint neurolytic procedures. CONCLUSIONS This analysis shows a significant effect of COVID-19 producing an overall decrease in utilization of facet joint interventions relative to pre-COVID data. Further, the analysis demonstrates continued deceleration of utilization patterns of facet joint interventions compared to the periods of 2000-2010 and 2010-2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laxmaiah Manchikanti
- grid.419960.30000 0004 0649 0485Pain Management Centers of America, 67 Lakeview Drive, Paducah, KY 42001 USA
- grid.266623.50000 0001 2113 1622University of Louisville, Louisville, KY USA
- grid.411417.60000 0004 0443 6864Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, LSU Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA USA
| | - Alan D. Kaye
- grid.411417.60000 0004 0443 6864Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA USA
| | - Richard E. Latchaw
- grid.416958.70000 0004 0413 7653Department of Radiology, University of California at Davis Health System, Sacramento, CA USA
| | - Mahendra R. Sanapati
- grid.419960.30000 0004 0649 0485Pain Management Centers of America, Evansville, IN USA
| | - Vidyasagar Pampati
- grid.419960.30000 0004 0649 0485Pain Management Centers of America, 67 Lakeview Drive, Paducah, KY 42001 USA
| | - Christopher G. Gharibo
- grid.137628.90000 0004 1936 8753NYU Langone Health and NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY USA
- grid.137628.90000 0004 1936 8753NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY USA
| | | | - Joshua A. Hirsch
- grid.38142.3c000000041936754XMassachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Manchikanti L, Knezevic NN, Knezevic E, Abdi S, Sanapati MR, Soin A, Wargo BW, Navani A, Atluri S, Gharibo CG, Simopoulos TT, Kosanovic R, Abd-Elsayed A, Kaye AD, Hirsch JA. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Effectiveness of Radiofrequency Neurotomy in Managing Chronic Neck Pain. Pain Ther 2022; 12:1-48. [PMID: 36465720 PMCID: PMC9686245 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-022-00455-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Accepted: 10/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Extensive research into potential sources of neck pain and referred pain into the upper extremities and head has shown that the cervical facet joints can be a potential pain source confirmed by precision, diagnostic blocks. Study Design Systematic review and meta-analysis utilizing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist, quality assessment of the included studies, conventional and single-arm meta-analysis, and best evidence synthesis. Objective The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the effectiveness of radiofrequency neurotomy as a therapeutic cervical facet joint intervention in managing chronic neck pain. Methods Available literature was included. Methodologic quality assessment of studies was performed from 1996 to September 2021. The level of evidence of effectiveness was determined. Results Based on the qualitative and quantitative analysis with single-arm meta-analysis and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) system of appraisal, with inclusion of one randomized controlled trial (RCT) of 12 patients in the treatment group and eight positive observational studies with inclusion of 589 patients showing positive outcomes with moderate to high clinical applicability, the evidence is level II in managing neck pain with cervical radiofrequency neurotomy. The evidence for managing cervicogenic headache was level III to IV with qualitative analysis and single-arm meta-analysis and GRADE system of appraisal, with the inclusion of 15 patients in the treatment group in a positive RCT and 134 patients in observational studies. An overwhelming majority of the studies produced multiple lesions. Limitations There was a paucity of literature and heterogeneity among the available studies. Conclusion This systematic review and meta-analysis shows level II evidence with radiofrequency neurotomy on a long-term basis in managing chronic neck pain with level III to IV evidence in managing cervicogenic headaches. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40122-022-00455-0.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laxmaiah Manchikanti
- Pain Management Centers of America, 67 Lakeview Drive, Paducah, KY 42001 USA
- Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, LSU Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA USA
| | - Nebojsa Nick Knezevic
- Department of Anesthesiology, Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center, Chicago, IL USA
- College of Medicine, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL USA
| | - Emilija Knezevic
- College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL USA
| | - Salahadin Abdi
- Department of Pain Medicine, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | | | - Amol Soin
- Ohio Pain Clinic and Wright State University, Dayton, OH USA
| | - Bradley W. Wargo
- Interventional Pain Management, Mays & Schnapp Neurospine & Pain, Memphis, TN USA
| | - Annu Navani
- Comprehensive Spine & Sports Center and Le Reve Regenerative Wellness, Campbell, CA USA
| | | | | | - Thomas T. Simopoulos
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Arnold Warfield Pain Management Center, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | | | - Alaa Abd-Elsayed
- UW Health Pain Services and UW Pain Clinic, Chronic Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, and University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health,, Madison, WI USA
| | - Alan D. Kaye
- Anesthesiology and Pharmacology, Toxicology, and Neurosciences, LSUHSC, Shreveport, LA USA
| | - Joshua A. Hirsch
- Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Diebels OR, Baheri B, Gios J, Dierick A, Hans G. The Importance of Initial Epidurography Prior to Any Drug Administration in Three-Day Adhesiolysis Procedure. Int Med Case Rep J 2022; 15:615-620. [PMID: 36353053 PMCID: PMC9639397 DOI: 10.2147/imcrj.s370185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Accepted: 09/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Percutaneous epidural adhesiolysis (PEA) is a minimal invasive procedure to relieve sciatalgia caused by post lumbar surgery syndrome (PLSS). Fluoroscopic-guided contrast-epidurography is essential to ensure a safe procedure. We present a case of a 28-year-old male patient who underwent a PEA which was complicated by a dural puncture. We highlight the dangers of such complications and discuss associated risk factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Owen Ray Diebels
- University of Antwerp (UA), Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), Edegem, Belgium
| | - Babak Baheri
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), Edegem, Belgium
- Correspondence: Babak Baheri, Email
| | - Jens Gios
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), Edegem, Belgium
| | - Ann Dierick
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), Edegem, Belgium
| | - Guy Hans
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), Edegem, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Janapala RN, Manchikanti L, Sanapati MR, Thota S, Abd-Elsayed A, Kaye AD, Hirsch JA. Efficacy of Radiofrequency Neurotomy in Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Pain Res 2021; 14:2859-2891. [PMID: 34531682 PMCID: PMC8439627 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s323362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2021] [Accepted: 08/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The objective of the systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy of radiofrequency neurotomy as a therapeutic lumbar facet joint intervention. Patients and Methods Utilizing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist, a systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. A comprehensive literature search of multiple data sources from 1966 to September 2020 including manual searches of bibliography of known review articles was performed. The inclusion criteria were based on the selection of patients with chronic low back pain with diagnosis confirmed based on controlled diagnostic blocks and with the publication of at least 6 months of results of appropriate outcome parameters. Quality assessment of the trials was performed with Cochrane review criteria and interventional pain management techniques-quality appraisal of reliability and risk of bias assessment (IPM-QRB). The level of evidence of effectiveness is classified at five levels ranging from Level I to Level V. The primary outcome measure was a significant reduction in pain, eg, short term (up to 6 months) and long term (more than 6 months). The secondary outcome measure was an improvement in functional status. Results A total of 12 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) met the inclusion criteria for evaluating the efficacy of lumbar radiofrequency neurotomy. Radiofrequency neurotomy showed Level II evidence for efficacy for both the short term and long term. Conclusion This systematic review of the assessment of the efficacy of radiofrequency neurotomy in managing chronic low back pain was based on the inclusion of 12 RCTs with a diagnostic block and at least 6 months of follow-up results that showed Level II evidence for both short-term and long-term improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rajesh N Janapala
- School of Medicine and Health Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Laxmaiah Manchikanti
- Pain Management Centers of America, Paducah, KY, USA.,Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.,Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, LSU Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Mahendra R Sanapati
- Pain Management Centers of America, Evansville, IN, USA.,Anesthesiology and Research, School of Medicine, LSU Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | | | - Alaa Abd-Elsayed
- UW Health Pain Services, and Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Alan D Kaye
- Departments of Anesthesiology and Pharmacology, Toxicology, and Neurosciences, LSU Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA, USA.,Ochsner Shreveport Hospital and Pain Clinic Feist-Weiller Cancer Center, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Joshua A Hirsch
- Neurointerventional Radiology and Spine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Manchikanti L, Knezevic E, Knezevic NN, Sanapati MR, Kaye AD, Thota S, Hirsch JA. The role of percutaneous neurolysis in lumbar disc herniation: systematic review and meta-analysis. Korean J Pain 2021; 34:346-368. [PMID: 34193641 PMCID: PMC8255147 DOI: 10.3344/kjp.2021.34.3.346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2021] [Revised: 05/27/2021] [Accepted: 05/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recalcitrant disc herniation may result in chronic lumbar radiculopathy or sciatica. Fluoroscopically directed epidural injections and other conservative modalities may provide inadequate improvement in some patients. In these cases, percutaneous neurolysis with targeted delivery of medications is often the next step in pain management. METHODS An evidence-based system of methodologic assessment, namely, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) was used. Multiple databases were searched from 1966 to January 2021. Principles of the best evidence synthesis were incorporated into qualitative evidence synthesis. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of patients with significant pain relief and functional improvement (≥ 50%). Duration of relief was categorized as short-term (< 6 months) and long-term (≥ 6 months). RESULTS This assessment identified one high-quality randomized controlled trial (RCT) and 5 moderate-quality non-randomized studies with an application of percutaneous neurolysis in disc herniation. Overall, the results were positive, with level II evidence. CONCLUSIONS Based on the present systematic review, with one RCT and 5 nonrandomized studies, the evidence level is II for percutaneous neurolysis in managing lumbar disc herniation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Emilija Knezevic
- University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Champaign, IL, USA
| | - Nebojsa Nick Knezevic
- Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center and College of Medicine, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Alan D. Kaye
- LSU Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Ochsner Shreveport Hospital and Pain Clinic Feist-Wieller Cancer Center, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Srinivasa Thota
- Pain Management Centers of America, Paducah, KY & Evansville, IN, USA
| | - Joshua A. Hirsch
- Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Manchikanti L, Vanaparthy R, Atluri S, Sachdeva H, Kaye AD, Hirsch JA. COVID-19 and the Opioid Epidemic: Two Public Health Emergencies That Intersect With Chronic Pain. Pain Ther 2021; 10:269-286. [PMID: 33718982 PMCID: PMC7955940 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-021-00243-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2020] [Accepted: 02/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has affected the entire world and catapulted the United States into one of the deepest recessions in history. While this pandemic rages, the opioid crisis worsens. During this period, the pandemic has resulted in the decimation of most conventional medical services, including those of chronic pain management, with the exception of virtual care and telehealth. Many chronic pain patients have been impacted in numerous ways, with increases in cardiovascular disease, mental health problems, cognitive dysfunction, and early death. The epidemic has also resulted in severe economic and physiological consequences for providers. Drug deaths in America, which fell for the first time in 25 years in 2018, rose to record numbers in 2019 and are continuing to climb, worsened by the coronavirus pandemic. The opioid epidemic was already resurfacing with a 5% increase in overall deaths from 2018; however, the preliminary data show that prescription opioid deaths continued to decline, while at the same time deaths due to fentanyl, methamphetamine, and cocaine climbed, with some reductions in heroin deaths. The health tracker data also showed that along with an almost 88% decline in elective surgeries, pain-related prescriptions declined 15.1%. Despite increases in telehealth, outpatient services declined and only began returning towards normal at an extremely slow pace, accompanied by reduced productivity and increased practice costs. This review, therefore, emphasizes the devastating consequences of concurrent epidemics on chronic pain management and the need to develop best practice efforts to preserve access to treatment for chronic pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laxmaiah Manchikanti
- Pain Management Centers of America, Paducah, KY, USA.
- Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
- Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, LSU Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, USA.
| | | | | | - Harsh Sachdeva
- Pain Division and Fellowship Program, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Alan D Kaye
- Anesthesiology and Pharmacology, Toxicology, and Neurosciences, Pain Management Fellow Program Director, LSU School of Medicine, Shreveport, LA, USA
- Anesthesiology and Pharmacology, LSU School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA
- Anesthesiology and Pharmacology, Tulane School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Joshua A Hirsch
- Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kim CH, Choi Y, Chung CK, Kim KJ, Shin DA, Park YK, Kwon WK, Yang SH, Lee CH, Park SB, Kim ES, Hong H, Cho Y. Nonsurgical treatment outcomes for surgical candidates with lumbar disc herniation: a comprehensive cohort study. Sci Rep 2021; 11:3931. [PMID: 33594185 PMCID: PMC7887235 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-83471-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2020] [Accepted: 02/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Physicians often encounter surgical candidates with lumbar disc herniation (LDH) who request non-surgical management even though surgery is recommended. However, second opinions may differ among doctors. Therefore, a prospective comprehensive cohort study (CCS) was designed to assess outcomes of nonsurgical treatment for surgical candidates who were recommended to undergo surgery for LDH but requested a second opinion. The CCS includes both randomized and observational cohorts, comprising a nonsurgery cohort and surgery cohort, in a parallel fashion. Crossover between the nonsurgery and surgery cohorts was allowed at any time. The present study was an as-treated interim analysis of 128 cases (nonsurgery cohort, n = 71; surgery cohort, n = 57). Patient-reported outcomes included visual analogue scores for the back (VAS-B) and leg (VAS-L), the Oswestry Disability Index, the EuroQol 5-Dimension instrument, and the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), which were evaluated at baseline and at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. At baseline, age and SF-36 physical function were significantly lower in the surgery cohort than in the nonsurgery cohort (p < 0.05). All adjusted outcomes significantly improved after both nonsurgical and surgical treatment (p < 0.05). The nonsurgery cohort showed less improvement of VAS-B and VAS-L scores at 1 month (p < 0.01), but no difference between cohorts was observed thereafter for 24 months (p > 0.01). Nonsurgical management may be a negotiable option even for surgical candidates in the shared decision-making process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chi Heon Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 103 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea.,Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea
| | - Yunhee Choi
- Division of Medical Statistics, Medical Research Collaborating Center, Seoul National University Hospital, 101, Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea
| | - Chun Kee Chung
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 103 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea. .,Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea. .,Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul, 08826, South Korea.
| | - Ki-Jeong Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 103 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea.,Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 82 Gumi-ro 173 Beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 13620, South Korea
| | - Dong Ah Shin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yonsei University Health System, 50-1 Yeonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, South Korea.,Department of Neurosurgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yeonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, South Korea
| | - Youn-Kwan Park
- Department of Neurosurgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, 148 Gurodong-ro, Guro-gu, Seoul, 08308, South Korea.,Department of Neurosurgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Korea-daero 73, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 02841, South Korea
| | - Woo-Keun Kwon
- Department of Neurosurgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, 148 Gurodong-ro, Guro-gu, Seoul, 08308, South Korea.,Department of Neurosurgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Korea-daero 73, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 02841, South Korea
| | - Seung Heon Yang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 103 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea.,Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea
| | - Chang Hyun Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 103 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea.,Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea.,Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 82 Gumi-ro 173 Beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 13620, South Korea
| | - Sung Bae Park
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 103 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea.,Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Boramae Hospital, Borame Medical Center 20, Boramae-ro 5-gil, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, 07061, South Korea
| | - Eun Sang Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Spine Center, School of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyunsook Hong
- Division of Medical Statistics, Medical Research Collaborating Center, Seoul National University Hospital, 101, Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea
| | - Yongeun Cho
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yeonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, South Korea.,Department of Neurosurgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, 211 Eonju-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06273, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|