Promising and Upcoming Treatments in Myositis

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: current insights and future frontiers

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies are a group of autoimmune diseases with a broad spectrum of clinical presentations, primarily characterised by immune-mediated muscle injury. Until recently, there was little insight into the pathogenesis of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, which challenged the recognition of the breadth of heterogeneity of this group of diseases as well as the development of new therapeutics. However, the landscape of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies is evolving. In the past decade, advances in diagnostic tools have facilitated an enhanced understanding of the underlying disease mechanisms in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, enabling the expansion of therapeutic trials. The fields of transcriptomics, prot§eomics, and machine learning offer the potential to gain greater insights into the underlying pathophysiology of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Harnessing insights gained from these sophisticated tools could contribute to the identification of differences at a molecular level among patients, accelerating the development of targeted, tailored therapies. Bolstered by the validation and standardisation of robust outcome measures, many promising therapies are in clinical trial development. Although challenges remain, there is great optimism in the field due to the progress in innovative diagnostics, outcome measures, and therapeutic approaches. In this Review, we discuss the expanding landscape of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies as the frontier of precision medicine becomes imminent.

Phase 3, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study of ustekinumab in Japanese patients with active polymyositis and dermatomyositis who have not adequately responded to one or more standard-of-care treatments

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ustekinumab (UST) in a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in adult Japanese patients with active polymyositis (PM) and dermatomyositis (DM).

METHODS

Fifty-one Japanese adults diagnosed with active PM/DM who did not respond adequately to one or more standard-of-care treatments were randomised 1:1 to receive UST (n=25) or placebo (n=26). Participants received body weight-range based intravenous administration of UST (6 mg/kg) or placebo at week 0 followed by 90 mg subcutaneous (SC) administration of UST or placebo every 8 weeks from week 8 to week 24. At week 24, placebo group crossed over to receive body weight-range based intravenous administration of UST, and thereafter, all participants received/were to receive SC administration of UST 90 mg every 8 weeks (week 32 through to week 72). The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of participants who achieved minimal improvement (≥20) in the International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies Total Improvement Score (IMACS TIS) at week 24.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference was seen in the proportion of participants who achieved minimal improvement (≥20) in IMACS TIS at week 24 between the treatment groups (UST 64.0% vs placebo 61.5%, p=0.94) based on the primary estimand of the primary endpoint analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

UST was safe and well tolerated but did not meet the primary efficacy endpoint in adult Japanese participants with active PM/DM based on the primary analysis at week 24 in the study.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03981744.

Autoimmune inflammatory myopathies

The autoimmune inflammatory myopathies constitute a heterogeneous group of acquired myopathies that have in common the presence of endomysial inflammation and moderate to severe muscle weakness. Based on currently evolved distinct clinical, histologic, immunopathologic, and autoantibody features, these disorders can be best classified as dermatomyositis, necrotizing autoimmune myositis, antisynthetase syndrome-overlap myositis, and inclusion body myositis. Although polymyositis is no longer considered a distinct subset but rather an extinct entity, it is herein described because its clinicopathologic information has provided over many years fundamental information on T-cell-mediated myocytotoxicity, especially in reference to inclusion body myositis. Each inflammatory myopathy subset has distinct immunopathogenesis, prognosis, and response to immunotherapies, necessitating the need to correctly diagnose each subtype from the outset and avoid disease mimics. The paper describes the main clinical characteristics that aid in the diagnosis of each myositis subtype, highlights the distinct features on muscle morphology and immunopathology, elaborates on the potential role of autoantibodies in pathogenesis or diagnosis , and clarifies common uncertainties in reference to putative triggering factors such as statins and viruses including the 2019-coronavirus-2 pandemic. It extensively describes the main autoimmune markers related to autoinvasive myocytotoxic T-cells, activated B-cells, complement, cytokines, and the possible role of innate immunity. The concomitant myodegenerative features seen in inclusion body myositis along with their interrelationship between inflammation and degeneration are specifically emphasized. Finally, practical guidelines on the best therapeutic approaches are summarized based on up-to-date knowledge and controlled studies, highlighting the prospects of future immunotherapies and ongoing controversies.

Past, Present, and Future in Dermatomyositis Therapeutics

Purpose of review

This review highlights current and emerging pharmacologic therapies for the treatment of dermatomyositis (DM). Current clinical evidence, in addition to recently published and ongoing clinical trials for various drugs in development, are summarized in this review.

Recent findings

There has been significant progress in the research and development of potential treatments in DM. The FDA recently approved Octagam® 10% Immune Globulin Intravenous (IVIg) for the treatment of DM. Several drug targets are being explored as viable therapeutic options in phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trials; at the forefront of these are JAK inhibitors (tofacitinib and baricitinib) and T-cell co-stimulation blockers (i.e. abatacept). In addition, clinical trials are currently under way for therapeutics targeting novel molecular pathways, including immunoproteasome inhibitors, anti-B cell therapy, anti-interferon drugs, complement inhibitors, and phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors.

Summary

With the large number of clinical trials, multiple novel therapeutics in development, and improved classification and outcome measures, the treatment landscape for DM will continue to rapidly evolve in the coming years as more options become available.

Unmet Medical Needs in Chronic, Non-communicable Inflammatory Skin Diseases

An estimated 20-25% of the population is affected by chronic, non-communicable inflammatory skin diseases. Chronic skin inflammation has many causes. Among the most frequent chronic inflammatory skin diseases are atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, urticaria, lichen planus, and hidradenitis suppurativa, driven by a complex interplay of genetics and environmental factors. Autoimmunity is another important cause of chronic skin inflammation. The autoimmune response may be mainly T cell driven, such as in alopecia areata or vitiligo, or B cell driven in chronic spontaneous urticaria, pemphigus and pemphigoid diseases. Rare causes of chronic skin inflammation are autoinflammatory diseases, or rheumatic diseases, such as cutaneous lupus erythematosus or dermatomyositis. Whilst we have seen a significant improvement in diagnosis and treatment, several challenges remain. Especially for rarer causes of chronic skin inflammation, early diagnosis is often missed because of low awareness and lack of diagnostics. Systemic immunosuppression is the treatment of choice for almost all of these diseases. Adverse events due to immunosuppression, insufficient therapeutic responses and relapses remain a challenge. For atopic dermatitis and psoriasis, a broad spectrum of innovative treatments has been developed. However, treatment responses cannot be predicted so far. Hence, development of (bio)markers allowing selection of specific medications for individual patients is needed. Given the encouraging developments during the past years, we envision that many of these challenges in the diagnosis and treatment of chronic inflammatory skin diseases will be thoroughly addressed in the future.

A glance into the future of myositis therapy

The idiopathic inflammatory myopathies are chronic diseases of the skeletal muscle that comprise various conditions, including dermatomyositis, polymyositis, immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy, and the antisynthetase syndrome. Although there are a number of distinguishing features, all these disorders are characterized by an immune and inflammatory response mainly directed against the muscle. Hence, therapy is geared toward curbing the autoimmune and inflammatory response. A quite wide range of medications are currently available to treat these disorders, but despite all therapeutic progress still a number of patients are unable to maintain a sustained remission. In this review article, we have marshaled a variety of potential therapeutic agents that may hold promise for the future treatment of the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. It is to be expected that by increasing the therapeutic armamentarium with agents that have different mechanisms of action even challenging cases could be successfully managed, thus reducing disease burden and disability.

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: a review

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) is the umbrella term including dermatomyositis (DM), polymyositis (PM), overlap myositis (OM), sporadic inclusion body myositis (IBM) and necrotising autoimmune myopathy (NAM), also known as immune-mediated necrotising myopathy. There is some debate as to whether PM exists as a discrete entity, or perhaps is an overly generalising term encompassing connective tissue disease associated myositis, or OM, and the previously poorly recognised NAM. As such, PM will not be covered in detail in this review. DM, OM and NAM all present similarly, with proximal weakness and elevated creatine kinase (CK) level. By contrast, IBM preferentially involves the long finger flexors and quadriceps, and presents with a normal or only mildly elevated CK. Developments in serological testing and imaging are shifting the diagnostic paradigm away from a reliance on histopathology. The therapeutic armamentarium for IIM continues to evolve, with intravenous immunoglobulin and rituximab proving to be successful for refractory disease. This review will provide a diagnostic algorithm for the clinician to help distinguish between IIM subtypes - with emphasis on clinical assessment, serology and imaging, as well as discussion of therapeutic options and escalation of immunotherapy.