Cytoreductive nephrectomy in metastatic renal cancer

The Role of Metastasectomy in Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma with Sarcomatoid Dedifferentiation: A Matched Controlled Analysis

PURPOSE

Management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma with sarcomatoid dedifferentiation remains a therapeutic challenge with no standard treatment strategies. We evaluated whether metastasectomy has any survival benefit in patients with metastatic sarcomatoid dedifferentiation treated with radical nephrectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From an institutional database of 273 patients with sarcomatoid dedifferentiation treated with nephrectomy we matched 80 with synchronous and asynchronous metastases for age, ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status, histology and lymph node status. Matched pairs were then retained only if patients who did not undergo metastasectomy were alive at metastasectomy comparable to matched surgical patients to decrease the bias of survival outcomes. Overall survival from nephrectomy was studied using univariable and multivariable proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

Median overall survival was 8.3 (95% CI 6.5-10.5) and 18.5 months (95% CI 11.5-42.9) in patients with synchronous and asynchronous metastases, respectively. Overall survival in patients who underwent metastasectomy for synchronous metastasis compared to nonsurgical patients was 8.4 and 8.0 months (p = 0.35), respectively. Similarly, overall survival in patients with asynchronous metastases treated with metastasectomy compared to the nonsurgical group was 36.2 and 13.7 months, respectively (p = 0.29). On multivariable analysis positive lymph nodes at nephrectomy were associated with an increased risk of death in the synchronous and asynchronous patient subgroups (HR 2.1, 95% CI 1.1-4.0, p = 0.03 and HR 3.3, 95% CI 1.2-9.2, p = 0.02, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In the current study there was no clear evidence of benefit in patients with sarcomatoid dedifferentiation who underwent metastasectomy after nephrectomy. Particularly, the group of patients with pathological lymph node positive disease at nephrectomy had considerably worse survival.

Surgical Management of Local Retroperitoneal Recurrence of Renal Cell Carcinoma after Radical Nephrectomy

PURPOSE

Isolated local retroperitoneal recurrence after radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma poses a therapeutic challenge. We investigated outcomes in patients with localized retroperitoneal recurrence treated with surgical resection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective, single institutional study of 102 patients with retroperitoneal recurrence treated with surgery from 1990 to 2014. Demographics, clinical and pathological features, location of retroperitoneal recurrence and perioperative complications are reported using descriptive statistics. We studied recurrence-free and cancer specific survival using univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Median age at retroperitoneal recurrence diagnosis was 55 years (IQR 49-64). Cancer was pT3-4 in 62 patients (60.8%) and pN1 in 20 (19.6%). No patients had distant metastatic disease at retroperitoneal recurrence surgery. Median time from nephrectomy to retroperitoneal recurrence diagnosis was 19 months (IQR 5-38.8). The median size of the resected retroperitoneal recurrence was 4.5 cm (IQR 2.7-7). Median followup after recurrence surgery was 32 months (IQR 16-57). Metastatic progression was observed in 60 patients (58.8%) postoperatively. Neoadjuvant and salvage systemic therapy was administered in 46 (45.1%) and 48 patients (47.1%), respectively. On multivariate analysis pathological nodal stage at original nephrectomy and maximum diameter of retroperitoneal recurrence were identified as independent risk factors for cancer specific death.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicopathological factors at nephrectomy as well as retroperitoneal recurrence surgery are important prognosticators. Aggressive surgical resection offers potential cure in a substantial number of patients with retroperitoneal recurrence with acceptable complications and still has a dominant role in the management of isolated locally recurrent RCC.

Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy: Long-Term Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Although more than a decade of experience with laparoscopic radical nephrectomy indicates it is an alternative to open surgery for localized renal-cell carcinoma (RCC), the long-term oncologic effectiveness of this procedure remains to be established.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A thorough MEDLINE and PubMed literature research on long-term outcomes of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy was performed, and all pertinent articles were reviewed in detail. This review was formulated on the current cancer indication, the oncologic basis, the oncologic efficacy, and the longterm oncologic effectiveness of the procedure, including laparoscopic cytoreductive nephrectomy, with regard to metastasis, port-site tumor recurrence, and the relation to laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Furthermore, the authors' previous report on the intermediate-term efficacy of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy was updated.

RESULTS

With increasing experience, the indications for laparoscopic radical nephrectomy continue to expand. There were many reports of intermediate-term, two reports of long-term, and our up-to-date outcomes analyzing the management of localized RCC that showed effective cancer control with no statistically significant difference between laparoscopic and open radical nephrectomy in the true 5- and 10-year survival analysis.

CONCLUSION

Long-term data, critical in the evaluation of any treatment for cancer, are currently available with respect to laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for localized RCC.

[Role of nephrectomy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Experience of the Department of Urology Juan Canalejo Hospital]

OBJECTIVES

We expose our experience in nephrectomy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma, and also show complications, evolution and survival of these patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performe a retrospective review of renal cell carcinoma treated at our service in the period between January 1st 1991 and December 31st 2002. We only studied those which presented in a metastatic pattern (31), and divide these in two groups: the ones which were nephrectomized and those which were not. We try to showw the differences between the two groups in order of status performance (E.C.O.G.), associated morbidity and median survival. In the first group we also study complications of surgery and treatment that patients underwent.

RESULTS

we performed nephrectomy in 19 cases, all of them E.C.O.G. 0-1. Median postoperative stay was 12 days, and complication rate was 11.5%. Of these patients, 45% underwent some type of systemic treatment, and median survival was 31 months. We didn't performed nephrectomy in 12 patients, of which 9 were E.C.O.G. 2-3. Associated co-morbidity was higher in this group. Only in three patients any treatment was offered always with palliative reason. Median survival was 3.8 months.

CONCLUSIONS

In those patients with good performance status this approach does not represent more morbility nor mortality than in non-metastatic patients, and that is a cornerstone in their management. We also make a literature review in which we see the last pathways in the management of these patients, and that show the needing for a combined approach both quirurgical and inmunotherapical. We have review with special interest the studie's conclusions of SWOG and EORTC groups.