Disparities in Female Pelvic Floor Disorders

Validation of the Arabic Linguistic Version of the Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Pelvic floor disorders (PFDs), significantly impacting women's quality of life, are often underdiscussed owing to misconceptions and limited understanding of treatment options. This study is aimed at validating an Arabic version of the Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire (PIKQ) to assess knowledge of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and urinary incontinence (UI) among Arabic-speaking women, addressing knowledge gaps in these areas.

METHODS

The study obtained ethical approval and followed a two-stage process, including a pilot study for preliminary validation and a larger study involving 300 participants. The PIKQ, a self-administered tool with two scales focusing on UI and POP, was translated into Arabic with cultural and linguistic adaptations. The study evaluated the reliability and validity of the Arabic PIKQ, employing Cronbach's alpha, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and Spearman's rho for reliability assessments, as well as factor analysis for construct validity.

RESULTS

The Arabic PIKQ demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha > 0.8) and test-retest reliability (ICC > 0.79) for both the UI and the POP scales. The questionnaire also showed significant construct validity. Among the 300 participants, knowledge gaps were evident, influenced by educational and professional backgrounds. Notably, 22% reported UI and 14.7% reported pelvic organ prolapse, with less than half seeking treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The Arabic PIKQ has been validated as a reliable tool for improving knowledge and addressing misconceptions regarding PFDs among Arabic-speaking women. The study underscores the importance of culturally sensitive educational tools in enhancing awareness and facilitating access to medical care for pelvic floor disorders.

Implication of Neighborhood Deprivation Index on Pelvic Organ Prolapse Management

IMPORTANCE

Differences in the rate of diagnosis of POP have been described based on race and ethnicity; however, there are few data available on the management and treatment patterns of POP based on multiple factors of socioeconomic status and deprivation.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to investigate the association between pelvic organ prolapse (POP) management and the Neighborhood Deprivation Index (NDI), a standardized multidimensional measure of socioeconomic status.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included female members of a large integrated health care delivery system who were 18 years or older and had ≥4 years of continuous health care membership from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2019. Demographic, POP diagnosis, urogynecology consultation, and surgical treatment of POP were obtained from the electronic medical record. Neighborhood Deprivation Index data were extrapolated via zip code and were reported in quartiles, with higher quartiles reflecting greater deprivation. Descriptive, bivariate, and logistic regression analyses were conducted by NDI.

RESULTS

Of 1,087,567 patients identified, 34,890 (3.2%) had a POP diagnosis. Q1, the least deprived group, had the highest prevalence of POP (26.3%). Most patients with POP identified as White (57.3%) and represented approximately a third of Q1. Black patients had the lowest rate of POP (5.8%) and comprised almost half of Q4, the most deprived quartile. A total of 13,730 patients (39.4%) had a urogynecology consultation, with rates ranging from 23.6% to 26.4% (P < 0.01). Less than half (12.8%) of patients with POP underwent surgical treatment, and the relative frequencies of procedure types were similar across NDI quartiles except for obliterative procedures (P = 0.01). When controlling for age, no clinically significant difference was demonstrated.

CONCLUSIONS

Differences in urogynecology consultation, surgical treatment, and surgical procedure type performed for prolapse across NDI quartiles were not found to be clinically significant. Our findings suggest that equitable evaluation and treatment of prolapse can occur through a membership-based integrated health care system.

Epidemiological Profile and Attitudes of Pregnant Women Toward Urinary Incontinence: A Single-Center Cross-Sectional Study

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to highlight the epidemiological and clinical profile of urinary incontinence in pregnant women during the first trimester and to determine their knowledge and attitudes toward this condition in Kinshasa.

METHODS

We carried out a descriptive cross-sectional study among 127 pregnant women who came for prenatal consultations in the first trimester from January to March 2022 at the LISANGA Medical Centre in Kinshasa. A questionnaire was developed containing the Urinary Symptom Profile (USP) scale. Kolmogorov-Smirnov normality tests were used to determine the normality of the distribution of the study variables. Inferential statistics were performed. The significance level was 0.05.

RESULTS

The mean age was 29.7±5.5 years. Thirty-eight women (29.9%) were primigravida. The median age of pregnancy was 6 weeks of amenorrhoea. The prevalence of urinary incontinence was 73.2%, with 31.2% of urge urinary incontinence and 16.1% of stress incontinence. In 61.4% of cases, overactive bladder was associated with urinary incontinence. Among the incontinent pregnant women, 3.2% had consulted a doctor while accepting that this condition is a health problem, 13.4% knew they had a pelvic floor muscle, 4.7% had knowledge of its rehabilitation, and 8.7% had benefited from gymnastics during pregnancy.

CONCLUSIONS

Urinary incontinence was frequent in the first trimester of pregnancy with a predominance of urgency. It was hardly discussed during prenatal consultations and pregnant women were not aware of the pelvic floor muscle, its rehabilitation, and of gymnastics during pregnancy.

Differences in Anorectal Manometry Values Among Women With Fecal Incontinence in a Racially, Ethnically, and Socioeconomically Diverse Population

IMPORTANCE

Anorectal manometry (ARM) is a valuable diagnostic and therapeutic tool that can both aid in identifying mechanisms contributing to fecal incontinence (FI) and inform management strategies. Consensus on standard reference range values has not been established, and women of varying racial and ethnic backgrounds are not well-represented in the current literature.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to compare ARM values between women of different racial and ethnic groups with FI.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of women with FI who underwent ARM at a tertiary health system in an urban underserved community between 2016 and 2021. Demographic information and ARM values were collected from the medical record. Socioeconomic status (SES) was represented by the percent of the population living below the poverty line according to zip code using U.S. census data. Anorectal manometry values were compared between racial and ethnic groups, and multivariable logistic regression was conducted to control for patient characteristics.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight women were included in the analysis: 33% Hispanic, 22% Black, and 45% White. Hispanic and Black women had higher body mass index and higher rates of diabetes and loose stools and were of significantly lower SES compared with White women. Black and Hispanic women had significantly lower thresholds for volume at first sensation and higher mean anal squeeze pressure. Differences were maintained after controlling for body mass index, diabetes, SES, and diarrhea (P = 0.03 and P = 0.01, respectively). Other ARM values were not significantly different between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Racial and ethnic differences in ARM values among women with FI exist. Further studies are needed to determine whether these differences have an impact on symptom severity, treatment selection and outcomes, and patient satisfaction.

Barriers to Urogynecologic Care for Racial and Ethnic Minority Women: A Qualitative Systematic Review

IMPORTANCE

Studies have sought to evaluate factors that have perpetuated disparities in health care, including urogynecologic care. However, there remains a lack of understanding of barriers to care specific to racial/ethnic minority populations.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to report identified barriers to urogynecologic care (eg, care for symptoms/diagnoses of urinary incontinence [UI], accidental bowel leakage [ABL], and pelvic organ prolapse [POP]) for underrepresented racial and ethnic minority (URM) women in the United States.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a systematic search for studies through 5 electronic bibliographic databases. Inclusion criteria for eligible studies included the following: (1) studies reporting barriers to care for those with urogynecologic symptoms/diagnoses, (2) publication date year 2000 or later. Exclusion criteria included study cohorts with children, exclusively non-U.S. populations, cohorts without URM participants, and studies without qualitative research methodology. Study methodology, characteristics, as well as barriers and facilitators to urogynecologic care were captured using a thematic synthesis approach.

RESULTS

There were 360 studies identified. Twelve studies met criteria: 6 had study populations with UI, 3 with POP, 2 on UI and/or POP, and 1 on ABL. There were 7 focus group studies (total 44 groups, n = 330), 4 interview studies (total 160 interviews, n = 160), and 1 had both (10 interviews, 6 groups, n = 39). Most studies reported on patient-associated barriers (n = 10/12) and physician/provider-associated barriers (n = 10/12), whereas only half reported system-associated barriers (n = 6/12).

CONCLUSION

Identified barriers to urogynecologic care for URM populations were examined. Findings likely do not fully reflect barriers to urogynecologic care for URM populations. Comprehensive evaluation of social determinants of health and systemic racism within studies is needed to understand the unique barriers present for racially/ethnically diverse populations.

Polypharmacy and Multimorbidity in the Urogynecology Population and Their Effect on Pelvic Floor Symptoms

IMPORTANCE

Polypharmacy and multimorbidity are common in older adults but has not been well studied in the urogynecologic patient population.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of polypharmacy and multimorbidity in a diverse outpatient urogynecologic population and to examine whether polypharmacy and/or multimorbidity were associated with lower urinary tract symptoms, pelvic organ prolapse, defecatory distress, and/or female sexual dysfunction.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a secondary analysis of a dual-center cross-sectional study of new patients presenting for evaluation of pelvic floor disorders at 2 urban academic outpatient urogynecology clinics. Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics were obtained from the electronic medical record. Validated surveys were administered to determine severity of lower urinary tract symptoms (Overactive Bladder Validated 8-Question Screener, Urogenital Distress Inventory-6), pelvic floor dysfunction (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory-6, Colorectal-Anal Distress Inventory-8), and sexual dysfunction (6-item Female Sexual Function Index). Standard statistical techniques were used.

RESULTS

One hundred ninety-seven women with mean age 58.8 years (SD, 13.4 years) were included, and most were of minority race/ethnicity (Black, 34.0%; Hispanic, 21.8%). The majority of participants met criteria for polypharmacy (58.4%) and multimorbidity (85.8%), with a mean prescription number of 6.5 (SD, ± 4.9) and mean number of medical comorbidities of 4.9 (SD, ± 3.3). Polypharmacy and multimorbidity were significantly associated with higher CRADI-8 scores. Specifically, polypharmacy was associated with straining with bowel movements and painful stools, whereas multimorbidity was associated with incomplete emptying and fecal urgency. There was no significant association between polypharmacy and multimorbidity with urinary symptoms, prolapse, or sexual dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

Polypharmacy and multimorbidity are common in the urogynecologic population. There is a relationship between greater defecatory distress and polypharmacy and multimorbidity.

Pelvic floor dysfunction in rural postpartum mothers in the United States: prevalence, severity, and psychosocial correlates

Pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) is a common gynecological problem; however, women residing in rural communities may refrain from seeking treatment for PFD. The purpose of this study was to characterize severity of PFD among postpartum women residing in rural communities (<50,000 residents) in the United States and explore the demographic and psychosocial correlates of PFD.

METHODS

A survey packet comprised of the Pelvic Floor Disability Index (PFDI-20) and Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire (PIKQ) as well as the Edinburgh Perinatal Depression Screening (EPDS), items from the Canadian Sexual Health Indicator (CSHI) survey, and demographic questions were distributed via electronic link following recruitment using social media. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the factors associated with PFDI-20 score.

RESULTS

Participants (n = 383) have limited pelvic health knowledge (PIKQ) despite self-reporting moderate symptoms of dysfunction (PFDI-20). Over half of women scored ≥14 on the EPDS, indicating probable depression. Women with high scores on the EPDS had greater odds of reporting moderate/severe PFD. Women that identified as Black and/or having a college degree were more likely to report moderate/severe PFD.

CONCLUSION

Rural women require further support to improve their physical and psychological health in the postpartum period.

Inadequacy and underreporting of study subjects' race and ethnicity in federally funded pelvic floor research

BACKGROUND

The inclusion of participants who are Black, Indigenous people of color, and participants of various ethnicities is a priority of federally sponsored research.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to describe the reporting of race and ethnicity in federally funded research published by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development-funded Pelvic Floor Disorders Network.

STUDY DESIGN

Pelvic Floor Disorders Network publications were reviewed to determine whether race or ethnicity was reported. The number of participants included in each manuscript who were identified as White, Black, Asian, American Indian or Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, and "other," and the number of participants who identified as having Hispanic ethnicity were recorded. Data were analyzed by publication and by the pelvic floor disorder investigated, including urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, fecal incontinence, pregnancy-related pelvic floor disorders, and multiple pelvic floor disorders. Many publications reported on overlapping patient populations, which included primary trials and secondary analyses and studies. Data were analyzed both by counting participants every time they were reported in all papers and by counting the unique number of participants in only the original trials (primary paper published).

RESULTS

A total of 132 Pelvic Floor Disorders Network publications were published between 2003 and 2020. Of these, 21 were excluded because they were methods papers or described research without participants. Of the 111 remaining articles, 90 (81%) included descriptions of race and 55 (50%) included descriptions of ethnicity. All 13 primary trials described race and 10 of 13 (76.9%) described ethnicity. Of those publications that described race, 50 of 90 (56%) included only the categories of "White," "Black," and "Other," and 14 of 90 (16%) only described the percentage of White patients. Of the 49,218 subjects, there were 43,058 (87%) with reported race and 27,468 (56%) with reported ethnicity. Among subjects with race and ethnicity reported, 79% were reported as White, 9.9% as Black, 0.4% as Asian, 0.1% as American Indian or Alaska Native, and 4% as "other," whereas 13% were reported to be of Hispanic ethnicity. The racial and ethnic diversity varied based on the pelvic floor disorder studied (P<.01), which was driven by pregnancy-related and fecal incontinence studies because these had lower proportions of White patients than studies of other pelvic floor disorders.

CONCLUSION

Federally funded Pelvic Floor Disorders Network research does not consistently report the race and ethnicity of participants. Even in the publications that report these characteristics, Black, Indigenous people of color, and people of Hispanic ethnicity are underrepresented. Consistent reporting and recruitment of a diverse population of women is necessary to address this systemic inequity.

Prevalence of urinary incontinence in pregnant and postpartum women in the Democratic Republic of Congo

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

The objective was to describe the prevalence of urinary incontinence in pregnant and postpartum women in the Democratic Republic of Congo and to identify factors associated with urinary incontinence (UI) in these populations.

METHODS

We interviewed eligible women who sought prenatal or postnatal reproductive health clinic consultations over a 2-year period. Interviews collected information about demographics, obstetric history, and urinary incontinence symptoms, as well as the impact on the quality of life, via a validated questionnaire. Descriptive analyses compared women with and without urinary incontinence and compared characteristics of UI, stratified by pregnancy status. Logistic regression identified factors associated with UI among the entire sample, pregnant women, and postpartum women.

RESULTS

Overall, 268 out of 880 women had UI (30.5%); the prevalence was 33.4% (168 out of 503) among pregnant women and 26.5% (100 out of 377) among postpartum women, p = 0.03. Women who were pregnant were significantly more likely to experience stress incontinence (p = 0.01) and less likely to report moderate or large amounts of leakage (p = 0.002). A history of macrosomia and being currently pregnant were associated with UI in the entire sample (p < 0.05). Among pregnant women, the risk of UI decreased with increasing gestational age and increased with a history of macrosomia (p ≤ 0.01). Among postpartum women, a history of macrosomia and prior episiotomy were associated with UI (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Urinary incontinence is prevalent in pregnant and postpartum women in the Democratic Republic of Congo and is associated with a history of macrosomia. Efforts should focus on screening, evaluation, and treatment.

Sport and pelvic floor dysfunction in male and female athletes: A scoping review

AIMS

The aims of the present scoping review were to systematically map and summarize findings to identify any study that reported epidemiological data on pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) among male and female athletes.

METHODS

Six medical databases were searched up to March 2020. No language, study design, and publication type restrictions were applied. Additional studies were identified through gray literature and the reference lists of articles were screened. The results were presented numerically and thematically.

RESULTS

A total of 4358 records were identified with an initial search. A hundred studies met the criteria for inclusion. The number of studies published annually increased over the years. Cross-sectional studies (n = 62), urinary incontinence (n = 64), multiple sports (n = 58), and female athletes (n = 83) are the most investigated study design, condition, sport, and population, respectively. Only 12 studies explored PFD in the male population. Authors focused selectively on elite athletes in 21 studies.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first scoping review to provide a comprehensive overview of the topic. The major gaps in the literature include studies focused on male participants, other PFD (e.g., anal incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, and pelvic pain), with appropriate study design. This review may be useful to raise awareness of the issue among clinicians and stakeholders in sport and it may represent a starting point for future research.

Pelvic organ prolapse and uterine preservation: a survey of female gynecologists (POP-UP survey)

Background

The aim of this study was to explore the personal views of female gynecologists regarding the management of POP with a particular focus on the issue of uterine sparing surgery.

Methods

A questionnaire based survey of practicing female gynecologists in the Czech Republic, Slovenia and Slovakia.

Results

A total of 140 female gynecologists from 81 units responded to our questionnaire. The majority of respondents stated they would rely on a urogynecologist to aid them with their choice of POP management options. The most preferred options for POP management were sacrocolpopexy and physiotherapy. Almost 2/3 of respondents opted for a hysterectomy together with POP surgery, if they were menopausal, even if the anatomical outcome was similar to uterine sparing POP surgery. Moreover, 81.4% of respondents, who initially opted for a uterine sparing procedure, changed their mind if the anatomical success of POP surgery with concomitant hysterectomy was superior. Discussing uterine cancer risk in relation to other organs had a less significant impact on their choices.

Conclusions

The majority of female gynecologists in our study opted for hysterectomy if they were postmenopausal at the time of POP surgery. However, variation in information provision had an impact on their choice.

Assessment of Pelvic Floor Anatomy for Male-to-Female Vaginoplasty and the Role of Physical Therapy on Functional and Patient-Reported Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Rapid increase in number of male-to-female vaginoplasties emphasizes the need for preoperative measures to optimize final surgical and patient-reported outcomes. Hormonal therapy and socioeconomic factors may contribute to a higher incidence of pelvic floor dysfunction in patients undergoing male-to-female vaginoplasty. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of pelvic floor dysfunction in this population and the role of physical therapy in its treatment.

METHODS

From July 2016 to July 2018, patients scheduled to undergo male-to-female vaginoplasty were evaluated by a physical therapist for pelvic floor dysfunction. Patient charts were reviewed for demographics, comorbidities, and length of hormonal therapy. Those with and without symptoms were compared. Symptomatic patients underwent therapy. Assessment of symptom severity and its impact on daily living were completed at 2- to 3-month intervals with physical therapy using the 6-item Urinary Distress Index 6 and 8-item Colorectal Anal Distress Index components of the 20-item Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) before and after surgery. A third component of the PFDI-20, the 6-item Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory, was also included in the postoperative assessment.

RESULTS

Over a 24-month period, a total of 40 patients with a mean age of 40.7 (19-72) years and body mass index of 27.1 kg/m (22-39 kg/m) were enrolled. Comorbidities included 4 patients (10%) with diabetes and 6 patients (15%) with hypertension. Patients with symptoms had a significantly higher mean age (P < 0.01). Only 1 patient (2.5%) had new-onset pelvic floor dysfunction after surgery, and there was no significant increase in severity of symptoms in those with a previous pelvic floor dysfunction postoperatively. Physical therapy significantly (P < 0.01) reduced severity of symptoms and its impact on daily living as assessed by the Urinary Distress Index and Colorectal Anal Distress Index before and after surgery and by the PFDI-20 and 7-item Pelvic Floor Dysfunction Index postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

A high incidence of pelvic floor dysfunction may exist in patients undergoing male-to-female vaginoplasty preoperatively. Screening at this early stage with both preoperative and postoperative therapy can significantly reduce pelvic floor dysfunction and improve symptoms and quality of life for this population.