Population strategies to treat hypertension

Household Air Pollution and Blood Pressure, Vascular Damage, and Subclinical Indicators of Cardiovascular Disease in Older Chinese Adults

BACKGROUND

Limited data suggest that household air pollution from cooking and heating with solid fuel (i.e., coal and biomass) stoves may contribute to the development of hypertension and vascular damage.

METHODS

Using mixed-effects regression models, we investigated the associations of household air pollution with blood pressure (BP) and vascular function in 753 adults (ages 40-79 years) from 3 diverse provinces in China. We conducted repeated measures of participants' household fuel use, personal exposure to fine particulate air pollution (PM2.5), BP, brachial-femoral pulse wave velocity (bfPWV), and augmentation index. Ultrasound images of the carotid arteries were obtained to assess intima-media thickness (CIMT) and plaques. Covariate information on sociodemographics, health behaviors, 24-h urinary sodium, and blood lipids was also obtained.

RESULTS

Average estimated yearly personal exposure to PM2.5 was 97.5 µg/m3 (SD: 79.2; range: 3.5-1241), and 65% of participants cooked with solid fuel. In multivariable models, current solid fuel use was associated with higher systolic (2.4 mm Hg, 95% CI: -0.4, 4.9) and diastolic BP (1.4 mm Hg, 95% CI: -0.1, 3.0) and greater total area of plaques (1.7 mm2, 95% CI: -6.5, 9.8) compared with exclusive use of electricity or gas stoves. A 1 - ln(µg/m3) increase in PM2.5 exposure was associated with higher systolic (1.5 mm Hg, 95% CI: 0.2, 2.7) and diastolic BP (1.0 mm Hg, 95% CI: 0.4, 1.7) and with greater CIMT (0.02 mm, 95% CI: 0.00, 0.04) and total area of plaques (4.7 mm2, 95% CI: -2.0, 11.5). We did not find associations with arterial stiffness, except for a lower bfPWV (-1.5 m/s, 95% CI: -3.0, -0.0) among users of solid fuel heaters.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings add to limited evidence that household air pollution is associated with higher BP and with greater CIMT and total plaque area.

Efficiency or equity? Simulating the impact of high-risk and population intervention strategies for the prevention of disease

Maximizing both efficiency and equity are core considerations for population health. These considerations can result in tension in population health science as we seek to improve overall population health while achieving equitable health distributions within populations. Limited work has explored empirically the consequences of different population health intervention strategies on the burden of disease and on within- and between-group differences in disease. To address this gap, we compared the impact of four simulated interventions using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. In particular, we focus on assessing how population and high-risk primary prevention and population and high-risk secondary interventions efforts to reduce smoking behavior influence systolic blood pressure (SBP) and hypertension, and how such strategies influence inequalities in SBP by income. The greatest reductions in SBP mean and standard deviation resulted from the population secondary prevention. High-risk primary and secondary prevention and population secondary prevention programs all yielded substantial reductions in hypertension prevalence. The effect of population primary prevention did little to decrease population SBP mean and standard deviation, as well as hypertension prevalence. Both high-risk strategies had a larger impact in the low-income population, leading to the greatest narrowing the income-related gap in disease. The population prevention strategies had a larger impact in the high-income population. Population health approaches must consider the potential impact on both the whole population and also on those with different levels of risk for disease within a population, including those in under-represented or under-served groups.

•

A central goal in population health is to maximize overall population health, while minimizing health inequalities within populations.

•

A greater understanding of these potential trade-offs can be gained through simulations and sensitivity analyses.

•

This study sought to understand the implications of four different strategies on the population prevalence and distribution of high systolic blood pressure.

•

The greatest reduction in SBP mean and standard deviation resulted from the population secondary prevention, while high-risk primary and secondary prevention and population secondary prevention all yielded substantial reductions hypertension.

•

Efforts to improve overall population health may disadvantage some groups; whether equity or efficiency is preferable is in part a matter of values.

Dietary salt restriction and blood pressure in clinical trials

Dietary salt has long been recognized as a major factor affecting blood pressure such that sodium intake is a component of lifestyle modification guidelines for control of high blood pressure. These recommendations are based on results from epidemiologic observational studies and clinical trials of various sodium diets among normotensives and hypertensives. Nonetheless, results from the different studies vary such that specific recommendations regarding sodium intake are difficult to interpret. The results from several recent major trials indicated greater associations of blood pressure and sodium intake than earlier studies as well as meta-analyses of numerous clinical trials. The studies of sodium intake and blood pressures are complicated by measurements of intake, salt sensitivity, hypertension treatment, effects of sodium independent of blood pressure, and length of interventions. Limitations in the methodology of different studies have reduced the value of the results to provide specific and reliable sodium intake levels essential for clinical and lifestyle guidelines.

Abdominal aortic aneurysm presenting as back pain to a chiropractic clinic: a case report

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to discuss a patient with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) who presented to a chiropractic teaching clinic and review the pathophysiology, therapeutic strategies, and complications associated with treatment of AAA.

CLINICAL FEATURES

A 69-year-old male patient experienced right-sided low back pain with radiation into the right leg for 3 weeks. The radiologic examination of the lumbar spine showed a 7.0-cm AAA and degenerative joint disease in the lumbar spine. Real-time ultrasonography showed an approximately 6.0-cm (transverse diameter), 4.1-cm (anteroposterior diameter), and approximately 7.0-cm (long) infrarenal AAA. Computed tomographic angiography showed additional bilateral iliac artery aneurysms.

INTERVENTION AND OUTCOME

This patient was treated with an endovascular stent graft repair of the abdominal aorta and bilateral iliac artery aneurysms. He has done well after surgery.

CONCLUSION

This article provides a case study and an overview of AAA. Rupture of an aortic aneurysm is preventable by cautious surveillance and the recognition of suspicious physical and radiographic findings in the population at risk. Early detection reduces mortality because repair is elective rather than emergent.