Duodenogastric Reflux-induced (Alkaline) Esophagitis

Management of upper gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with autoimmune gastritis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Autoimmune gastritis is characterized by atrophy of acid secreting parietal cells resulting in achlorhydria. Upper gastrointestinal symptoms are common in autoimmune gastritis and frequently result in prescriptions for acid suppressant medications despite the inability of the stomach to secrete acid. Evidence-based recommendations for management of gastrointestinal symptoms in autoimmune gastritis are lacking.

RECENT FINDINGS

The most common symptoms in patients with autoimmune gastritis are dyspepsia, heartburn, and regurgitation. Gastroesophageal reflux should be confirmed by pH-impedance testing and is typically weakly acid or alkaline. Therapy for reflux focuses on mechanical prevention of reflux (i.e., elevation of the head of the bed and alginates) or when severe, antireflux surgery. The etiology of dyspepsia in autoimmune gastritis is unclear and largely unstudied. In the first half of the 20th century, oral administration of acid to "aid digestion" was widely used with reported success. However, randomized, placebo-controlled trials are lacking. Here, we provide suggestions for attempting gastric acidification therapy.

SUMMARY

Upper GI symptoms are common in autoimmune gastritis. Their pathogenesis and therapy remain incompletely understood. Acid suppressant medications are useless and should be discontinued. A trial of acid replacement therapy is recommended especially in the form of placebo-controlled trials.

A New Robot-assisted Billroth-I Reconstruction: Details of the Technique and Early Results

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic surgery for gastric tumor is considered a demanding procedure because of lymph node dissection and reconstruction. Billroth-I (B-I) reconstruction after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy is commonly performed extracorporeally because of the complexity of an intracorporeal procedure. Robotic surgery overcomes some limitations of laparoscopy, allowing to reproduce the basic maneuvers of open surgery. We describe a new technique to perform robotic B-I anastomosis.

METHODS

Between January 2012 and February 2015, 5 patients underwent distal gastrectomy with intracorporeal B-I-stapled anastomosis. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, histopathologic features, and perioperative data were analyzed.

RESULTS

Median operative time was 170 minutes (145 to 180 min). There were no conversions. Contrast swallow was routinely performed on the third postoperative day. Median postoperative hospitalization was 7 days (range: 6 to 8). No major complications or mortality were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic distal gastrectomy with intracorporeal B-I anastomosis is a safe and promising technique in selected cases of gastric tumors.

Morphological Changes in the Upper Part of Digestive Tract in a Case of Experimental Duodenogastric Reflux

Experimental reproduction of duodeno-gastric reflux was performed among Wistar line 28 rats, which were injected with 50 % solution of medical bile by intragastric way. Morphological study had been shown significant structural changes in the gingival tissues, mucous membrane of an esophagus, stomach and duodenum. In the epithelial layer of gingiva and esophagus was observed numerous infringements in a process of differentiation cells, in the stroma was shown phenomena of fibrosis in a papillary layer, microcirculation disorders. In the gastric mucosa had been found out multiple erosions, the glandular cells were increased. It was demonstrated vacuolization of the basal and thorn layers of the stomach epithelium. In the stroma defined phenomena of fibrosis and a dense lymphocyte infiltration with eosinophils. In the duodenum was determined desquamation of a glandular epithelium, superficial erosions of the villi, lympho–histio–plasmocytosis infiltration in a stroma, microvascular disorders. The given experiment demonstrates a role of functional disorders in the pathogenesis of combined pathology in the upper gastrointestinal tract.

Comparison of quality of life between Billroth-І and Roux-en-Y anastomosis after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A randomized controlled trial

Studies comparing Billroth-I (B-I) with Roux-en-Y (R-Y) anastomosis are still lacking and inconsistent. The aim of this trial was to compare the quality of life (QoL) of B-I with R-Y reconstruction after curative distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. A total of 140 patients were randomly assigned to the B-I group (N = 70) and R-Y group (N = 70) with the comparable baseline characteristics. The overall postoperative morbidity rates were 18.6% and 25.7% in the B-I group and R-Y group without significant difference. More estimated blood loss and longer surgical duration were found in the R-Y group. At the postoperative 1 year time point, the B-I group had a higher score in pain, but lower score in global health. However, the R-Y anastomosis was associated with lower incidence of reflux symptoms at postoperative 6 months (P = 0.002) and postoperative 9 months (P = 0.007). The multivariable analyses of variance did not show any interactions between the time trend and grouping. For the results of endoscopic examination, the degree and extent of remnant gastritis were milder significantly in the R-Y group. The stronger anti-reflux capability of R-Y anastomosis contributes to the higher QoL by reducing the reflux related gastritis and pain symptoms, and promotes a better global health.

Quality of life after subtotal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Does restoration method matter? - A retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact on the quality of life (QoL) status of three gastrointestinal continuity restoration methods following a subtotal gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer.

METHODS

QoL data from 153 patients were obtained and evaluated in this retrospective cross-sectional case series study. A list of patients who responded to questionnaires on QoL was stratified into three arms based on which gastrointestinal continuity restoration method was used - Billroth I (n = 37), Roux-en-Y (n = 15), and Balfour (n = 101).

RESULTS

The mean global health status scores for the patients following the Billroth I, Roux-en-Y and Balfour reconstructive surgery arms were 62 ± 20.09, 61 ± 24.08 and 56 ± 21.2, respectively, (p = 0.182). The mean scores of the functional scales were not lower than 60 in any of the patient groups. For physical, role, cognitive, social functional scales, the Billroth I method had the best mean QoL score. Comparisons of the global QoL, functional activities, and majority of the postgastrectomy symptom scores at different time points after the surgeries (6-12 months vs > 1 year) did not reveal major significant differences between the groups. However, the results highlighted trends and ranked the gastrointestinal continuity restoration methods over time.

CONCLUSIONS

The best QoL scores were obtained from the patients who underwent the Billroth I surgery. The Roux-en-Y method was better than the Balfour method 6-12 months after surgery. However, the Balfour method was better than the Roux-en-Y after one year. Further prospective randomized controlled trials are needed.

Long-term comparison of boomerang-shaped jejunal interposition and Billroth-I reconstruction after distal gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

Billroth-I (BI) is a simple, physiological method of reconstruction following distal gastrectomy. In actuality, postoperative QOL is by no means favorable due to the high incidence of post-gastrectomy syndrome. The aim of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of boomerang-shaped jejunal interposition (BJI) after distal gastrectomy.

METHODS

Sixty-six patients with early gastric cancer underwent the BI procedure (n = 33) or BJI (n = 33) after distal gastrectomy, following which they were compared for 5 years. Tumor characteristics, operative details, postoperative complications and complaints, number of meals, and body weight were analyzed. Patients were followed up by endoscopy every 12 months.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the incidence of postoperative complications. The incidence of heartburn (30 vs. 0 %, P = 0.0009) and oral bitterness (33 vs. 6 %, P = 0.0112) were significantly lower in the BJI cases. Endoscopic findings revealed significantly lower incidences of reflux esophagitis (24 vs. 0 %, P = 0.0051) and remnant gastritis (70 vs. 3 %, P < 0.0001) in the BJI group. The incidence of food stasis was low in both groups (12 vs. 15 %). In the BJI group, 30 patients (90 %) were eating 3 meals/day within 12 months, whereas in the BI group, 16 patients (48 %) were still eating 5 meals/day at 12 months or later.

CONCLUSIONS

BJI is as safe as BI, but is better in terms of improvement in bile reflux and food intake without stasis. This procedure, therefore, appears to be a useful method for reconstruction after distal gastrectomy.

Refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease: advances and treatment

'Refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease' is one of the most common misnomers in the area of gastroesophageal reflux disease. The term implies reflux as the underlying etiology despite unresponsiveness to aggressive proton pump inhibitor therapy. The term should be replaced with 'refractory symptoms.' We must acknowledge that in many patients symptoms of reflux often overlap with non-GERD causes such as gastroparesis, dyspepsia, hypersensitive esophagus and functional disorders. Lack of response to aggressive acid suppressive therapy often leads to diagnostic testing. In majority of patients these tests are normal. The role of non-acid reflux in this group is uncertain and patients should not undergo surgical fundoplication based on this parameter. In patients unresponsive to acid suppressive therapy GERD is most commonly not causal and a search for non-GERD causes must ensue.

New Approaches to Management of PPI-Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

OPINION STATEMENT

"Refractory GERD" is one the most common misnomers in the area of gastroesophageal reflux disease. The term implies reflux as the underlying etiology despite unresponsiveness to aggressive, often twice-daily proton pump inhibitor therapy. The term should be replaced with "refractory symptoms." We must acknowledge that in many patients, symptoms of reflux often overlap with non-GERD causes such as gastroparesis, dyspepsia, hypersensitive esophagus, and functional disorders. Lack of response to aggressive acid suppressive therapy often leads to esophagogastroduodenoscopy followed by pH or impedance monitoring. In the majority of patients these tests are normal. The role of non-acid reflux measured by impedance pH testing in this group is uncertain at best and the results from this test alone should not be used to refer patients to surgical fundoplication. In patients unresponsive to acid suppressive therapy, reflux is most commonly not causal and a search for non-GERD causes must ensue.

Roux-en-Y versus Billroth I reconstruction after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A meta-analysis

AIM: To conduct a meta-analysis to compare Roux-en-Y (R-Y) gastrojejunostomy with gastroduodenal Billroth I (B-I) anastomosis after distal gastrectomy (DG) for gastric cancer.

METHODS: A literature search was performed to identify studies comparing R-Y with B-I after DG for gastric cancer from January 1990 to November 2012 in Medline, Embase, Science Citation Index Expanded and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in The Cochrane Library. Pooled odds ratios (OR) or weighted mean differences (WMD) with 95%CI were calculated using either fixed or random effects model. Operative outcomes such as operation time, intraoperative blood loss and postoperative outcomes such as anastomotic leakage and stricture, bile reflux, remnant gastritis, reflux esophagitis, dumping symptoms, delayed gastric emptying and hospital stay were the main outcomes assessed. Meta-analyses were performed using RevMan 5.0 software (Cochrane library).

RESULTS: Four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 9 non-randomized observational clinical studies (OCS) involving 478 and 1402 patients respectively were included. Meta-analysis of RCTs revealed that R-Y reconstruction was associated with a reduced bile reflux (OR 0.04, 95%CI: 0.01, 0.14; P < 0.00 001) and remnant gastritis (OR 0.43, 95%CI: 0.28, 0.66; P = 0.0001), however needing a longer operation time (WMD 40.02, 95%CI: 13.93, 66.11; P = 0.003). Meta-analysis of OCS also revealed R-Y reconstruction had a lower incidence of bile reflux (OR 0.21, 95%CI: 0.08, 0.54; P = 0.001), remnant gastritis (OR 0.18, 95%CI: 0.11, 0.29; P < 0.00 001) and reflux esophagitis (OR 0.48, 95%CI: 0.26, 0.89; P = 0.02). However, this reconstruction method was found to be associated with a longer operation time (WMD 31.30, 95%CI: 12.99, 49.60; P = 0.0008).

CONCLUSION: This systematic review point towards some clinical advantages that are rendered by R-Y compared to B-I reconstruction post DG. However there is a need for further adequately powered, well-designed RCTs comparing the same.

Morbidity and mortality results from a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing Billroth I and Roux-en-Y reconstructive procedures after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Billroth I (B-I) and Roux-en-Y (R-Y) reconstructions are commonly performed after distal gastrectomy. Which reconstruction procedure is superior remains controversial. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to compare the clinical efficacy of B-I and R-Y.

METHODS

Between August 2005 and December 2008, a total of 332 patients with potentially curable gastric cancer enrolled from 18 institutions were intraoperatively randomized to either the B-I group or the R-Y group. Postoperative morbidity and hospital mortality were recorded prospectively in a fixed format and were compared between these two groups.

RESULTS

The operating time was significantly longer in the R-Y group than in the B-I group (214 vs. 180 minutes, P < 0.0001). Regarding clinical symptoms during the postoperative hospital stay, the incidence of nausea, vomiting, and discontinuance of food intake was significantly higher in the R-Y group than in the B-I group (12.4% vs. 3.7%, P = 0.0027; 8.9% vs. 3.1%, P = 0.022; and 12.4% vs. 4.3%, P = 0.0064, respectively). There was no significant difference in the overall operative morbidity rate between the R-Y and B-I groups (13.6% vs. 8.6%, respectively, P = 0.14). Anastomotic leakage occurred in two patients (1.2%) in the B-I group and in none in the R-Y group; the difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.09). Postoperative hospital stay was significantly longer in the R-Y group than in the B-I group (16.4 vs. 14.1 days, P = 0.019).

CONCLUSIONS

We concluded that B-I reconstruction was superior to R-Y reconstruction in terms of perioperative complications.

Microbial flora of the stomach after gastric bypass for morbid obesity

BACKGROUND

The normal stomach is virtually sterile but the effect of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) on bacterial flora in the used (very small proximal pouch) and unused (large bypassed) gastric chambers is not known. In a prospective study, this variable was documented.

METHODS

Bariatric subjects (n=37) were submitted to endoscopic examination of both gastric reservoirs via FUJINON enteroscope model EN-450P5, 7.3 +/- 1.4 years after RYGBP. Age was 42.4 +/- 9.9 years (70.2% females), preoperative BMI was 53.5 +/- 10.6, and current BMI was 32.6 +/- 7.8 kg/m2. Methods included quantitative culture of gastric secretion along with gastric pH and lactulose/hydrogen breath test.

RESULTS

None of the subjects displayed diarrhea, malabsorption or other complaints suggestive of GI bacterial overgrowth. Elevated counts of bacteria and fungi were identified in both chambers, with predominance of aerobes and anaerobes, but not molds and yeasts, in the proximal stomach. Gram-positive cocci, bacilli and coccobacilli represented the majority of the isolates. Gastric pH was neutral (pH 7.0 +/- 0.2) in the proximal pouch, whereas the distal chamber mostly but not always conserved the expected acidity (pH 3.3 +/- 2.2, P<0.001). The breath test for bacterial overgrowth was positive in 40.5% of the population.

CONCLUSIONS

1) Frequent colonization of both gastric chambers was detected; 2) Aerobes, anaerobes and fungi were represented in both situations; 3) Gastric pH as well as bacterial count was higher in the functioning proximal stomach; 4) Breath test was positive in 40.5% of the subjects; 5) Clinical manifestation such as diarrhea, malabsorption or pneumonia were not demonstrated; 6) Further histologic and microbiologic studies of both the stomach and the small bowel are recommended.

Type of gastrointestinal reconstruction affects postoperative recovery after pancreatic head resection

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

The postoperative recovery of gastric motility with various reconstructions after pancreatic head resection has been reported. However, little is known about this recovery after pancreatic head resection with segmental duodenectomy (PHRSD). Some have attributed gastric stasis after pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy (PPPD) to tube gastrostomy, but its effect on gastric motility has not been investigated. In this study, the postoperative recovery after PHRSD and PPPD, and gastric motility with and without gastrostomy after PPPD were investigated.

METHODS

We analyzed the first appearance of gastric phase III motility, postoperative systemic status, and body weight (BW; n = 32). The Imanaga PPPD and PHRSD were compared because the procedures differ only in the length of the remaining duodenum. Traverso and Roux-en-Y PPPDs were compared because the two procedures are similar except for the creation of gastrostomy.

RESULTS

(1) Times to first appearance of gastric phase III motility and BW recovery were significantly better after PHRSD than after the Imanaga PPPD (P < 0.05). (2) Times to first gastric phase III motility and resumption of a regular diet as well as periods of gastric sump tube use and postoperative hospital stay were significantly shorter after the Roux-en-Y than after the Traverso PPPD (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Preservation of as long a portion of the duodenum as possible, the choice of a Roux-en-Y duodenojejunostomy, and the avoidance of peritoneal fixation of the gastric wall may be factors that improve the recovery of gastric motility and BW after pancreatic head resection.

Increased esophageal sensitivity to acid and saline in patients with nonerosive gastro-esophageal reflux disease

GOALS

To investigate the features of nonerosive reflux disease (NERD).

BACKGROUND

NERD is not considered as a milder form of erosive gastro-esophageal reflux disease (eGERD). Although the prevalence of NERD was reported to be high in our country, there have been very few studies about NERD.

STUDY

We performed upper gastrointestinal endoscopy to confirm the diagnosis of GERD. The modified acid perfusion test and saline perfusion test were performed in 7 control subjects, 14 NERD, and 11 eGERD patients. The stimulus-response function to acid and saline was quantified by the duration of typical symptom perception (minutes), total sensory intensity rating (0 to 10), and the perfusion sensory score (SS), which was defined as the product of minutes and the sensory intensity rating.

RESULTS

The mean value of SS by saline was 0 in control subjects, 12.0 in NERD patients, and 1.5 in eGERD patients (P<0.01 control vs. NERD, P<0.01 NERD vs. eGERD). The mean SS with acid was 0.9 in control subjects, 52.5 in NERD patients, and 23.0 in eGERD patients (P<0.01 control vs. NERD, control vs. eGERD, P<0.05 NERD vs. eGERD). A statistically significant association was shown between the acid and saline perfusion SSs with a correlation coefficient value of r=0.57 in the NERD group (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Both eGERD and NERD, but especially NERD, exhibited esophageal hypersensitivity not only to acid but also saline perfusion, suggesting that hyperalgesia to acid and other factors (eg, psychologic and/or autonomic nerve disturbance) may play some roles in symptom generation in NERD.

The effect of photodynamic therapy (PDT) on oesophageal motility and acid clearance in patients with Barrett’s oesophagus

BACKGROUND

Barrett's oesophagus is the major risk factor for oesophageal adenocarcinoma. It is proposed that long-term re-epithelialisation, which has been achieved following ablation using 5-aminolaevulinic acid (5-ALA) photodynamic therapy (PDT) may reduce the risk of malignant change. However, it is not known whether PDT modifies oesophageal motility.

AIM

To assess oesophageal pH and motility before and after PDT ablation in treated and untreated areas of the oesophagus.

METHODS

Twelve patients (10 male) with Barrett's oesophagus, median segment length 4 cm, were treated with PDT ablation. Twenty-four hours pH assessment and oesophageal manometry were performed before and 4-6 weeks after ablation. PDT was carried out using 635 nm red light, 4-6h after administration of 30 mg/kg 5-ALA. Proximal (untreated) and distal (treated) oesophageal resting pressure, wave amplitude, percentage peristalsis and percentage study time oesophageal pH<4, were assessed. Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) were administered throughout the study.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in oesophageal motility in treated or untreated areas of the oesophagus after PDT compared to pre-treatment values. Patients who continued to experience oesophageal acid exposure required more treatments to achieve complete Barrett's ablation.

CONCLUSIONS

Oesophageal motility following ALA-PDT suggests a trend toward enhanced wave propagation however continued oesophageal acid exposure may affect PDT efficacy.

Biliary laryngopharyngeal reflux: a new pathological entity

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to summarize the recent understanding of the harmful effects of gastric and duodenal agents on mucosa of the upper aerodigestive tract in patients with duodeno-gastro-esophageal reflux.

RECENT FINDINGS

The damaging action of duodeno-gastro-esophageal reflux on the gastro-esophageal mucosa and its potential etiological role in the development of many inflammatory and neoplastic patterns have been well documented in the literature. Recently, there has been increasing evidence that duodeno-gastro-esophageal reflux may also be related to several laryngeal disorders and clinical studies confirm that reflux after gastric resection may enhance the development of laryngeal malignancies. Finally, there have been experimental attempts to confirm that duodenal contents may contribute to inflammation and carcinogenesis in the pharynx or larynx, as it is known to do in the esophagus.

SUMMARY

The association between duodeno-gastro-esophageal reflux and laryngeal lesions is of great interest to otolaryngologists because it focuses attention on a new pathological entity that could be classified as biliary laryngopharyngeal reflux. This condition, as an acid one, seems to represent an important dangerous, endogenous risk factor involved in the pathogenesis of inflammatory, precancerous and neoplastic laryngeal lesions. For these reasons, particular attention is required in the future regarding the understanding of the local environment, individual susceptibility and clinical treatment. Finally, new antireflux therapy should be considered to control not only the acid gastric component of the refluxate but also the duodenal component.

Treatment of oesophageal bile reflux in children: the results of a prospective study with omeprazole

OBJECTIVES

Reflux of duodenal juice into the oesophagus has a role in the pathogenesis of both oesophageal and laryngopharyngeal inflammatory and neoplastic lesions. As little is known about effective therapy, we studied the effect of proton pump inhibitor therapy on oesophageal bile reflux in children.

METHODS

Twenty-nine children with moderate to severe erosive oesophagitis and abnormal oesophageal bile reflux were studied before and after treatment with omeprazole 1 mg/kg per day. Outcomes included a clinical symptom score, oesophageal acid and bile reflux (simultaneous 24-hour pH and Bilitec 2000 monitoring), and mucosal healing.

RESULTS

After 8 weeks of therapy, 17 (59%) of the patients were symptom-free, and 5 (17%) had minimal symptoms. Mucosal healing or reduction to low-grade oesophagitis was achieved in 25 children (86%; P < 0.0005). Mean percentages of total, upright, and supine time with oesophageal pH less than 4 were reduced from 17.0%, 16.8%, and 19.2% before treatment, to 2.83%, 3.17%, and 2.07%, respectively, after treatment (all P < 0.00001). Similarly, mean percentages of total, upright, and supine time with bile reflux were reduced from 16.96%, 12.67%, and 22.0%, to 2.27%, 1.91%, and 2.23%, respectively (P < 0.000001, P < 0.0001, and P < 0.000001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Omeprazole 1 mg/kg per day is an effective therapy for the majority of children with severe erosive oesophagitis due to abnormal isolated bile reflux or combined acid and bile reflux. It remains unclear how patients with treatment-resistant bile reflux should be managed.

Prospective randomized trial comparing Billroth I and Roux-en-Y procedures after distal gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma

To determine the clinical efficacy of Roux-en-Y reconstruction (RY) after distal gastrectomy, we compared postoperative outcomes of patients who underwent RY or conventional Billroth I reconstruction (B-I). A total of 50 patients were prospectively randomized to either B-I or RY reconstruction, and complications, postoperative course, and nutritional status were compared. Bile reflux and inflammation in the remnant stomach and lower esophagus were evaluated by postoperative follow-up endoscopy at 6 months. Operative time and blood loss as well as postoperative nutrition did not show significant differences between the two groups. As anticipated, 5 of 24 patients with RY reconstruction developed gastrojejunal stasis in the early postoperative period, which led to a longer postoperative hospital stay as compared with the B-I group (mean +/- S.D; B-I; 19.0 +/- 6.2, RY; 31.8 +/- 21.7 days) (P < 0.05). Endoscopic examination revealed that the frequency of bile reflux (P < 0.01) and degree of inflammation in the remnant stomach (P < 0.05) were less in the RY group than in the B-I group. However, inflammatory findings in the lower esophagus were observed in 7 (27%) of B-I, and 8 (35%) of the RY group, suggesting that late phase esophagitis was not improved in the RY group. Roux-en-Y reconstruction was effective in preventing duodenogastric reflux and resulting gastritis, but it did not prevent esophagitis. Because RY reconstruction induces the frequent complication of Roux-en-Y stasis, causing longer postoperative hospital stay, this method has limited advantages over B-I anastomosis after distal gastrectomy.

Clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease

GERD is ubiquitous throughout the adult population in the United States. It commonly adversely affects quality of life and occasionally causes life-threatening complications. The new and emerging medical and endoscopic therapies for GERD and the new management strategies for BE should dramatically reduce the clinical toll of this disease on society.

Preventive effect of hydrotalcite on stress ulcer in rats after acute brain trauma

AIM: To study the role of bile reflux in the stress ulcer in rats after acute brain trauma, and to investigate the preventive role of Hydrotalcite (Talcid) to the stress ulcer.

METHODS: An animal model was established by Allen's method with modification. 128 male Wistar rats were divided randomly into four groups: Group I (n = 32): stress ulcer group, rats suffered from acute brain trauma without therapy; Group II (n = 32): normal control group, rats with sham operation; Group III (n = 32): Talcid group, rats suffered from acute brain trauma with Talcid administration; Group IV (n = 32): normal saline (NS) group, rats suffered from acute brain trauma with NS administration. Each group was divided into four subgroups of 1 h, 3 h, 6 h, and 24 h after the trauma (n = 8, for each subgroup). The rats in groups III and IV received Talcid and NS by gavage respectively before the operation for three days (Talcid: 500mg/kg.weight/day, NS: 1.5 mL/kg. weight/day). The bile acid concentration in the stomach and blood, the PH value and ulcer index (UI) were assayed, and the histology of gastric mucosa was analysed.

RESULTS: The concentration of gastric bile acid in group I was higher than that of group II at each time point (P <0.05, P <0.01); The damage of gastric mucosa was serious (P <0.05); and it showed a positive correlation between them (r = 0.05, P <0.01). But there was no difference in the blood bile acid and PH value. The histology showed corresponding changes. The concentration of gastric bile acid in group III was lower than that of group Ⅳ at each time point (P <0.01); The PH value at 1 h, 3 h, 6 h was higher but UI was lower at 6 h, 24 h in group III (P <0.01). There was a linear relationship between the gastric bile acid concentration or PH value and UI (r = 0.43, r = 0.52, P <0.01). The damage was ameliorated obviously in group III.

CONCLUSION: The bile reflux plays an important role in the stress ulcer after acute brain trauma. It shows a potential correlation between the extent of bile reflux and gastric mucosa damage. As a new combined bile acid drug, hydrotalcite can effectively prevent the occurrence of stress ulcer after acute brain trauma.