Managing Functional Disturbances in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Relationship between use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and irritable bowel syndrome: A population-based cohort study

AIM

To investigate the relationship between selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) use and the subsequent development of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS).

METHODS

This retrospective, observational, population-based cohort study collected data from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database. A total of 19653 patients newly using SSRIs and 78612 patients not using SSRIs, matched by age and sex at a ratio of 1:4, were enrolled in the study from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2010. The patients were followed until IBS diagnosis, withdrawal from the National Health Insurance system, or the end of 2011. We analyzed the effects of SSRIs on the risk of subsequent IBS using Cox proportional hazards regression models.

RESULTS

A total of 236 patients in the SSRI cohort (incidence, 2.17/1000 person-years) and 478 patients in the comparison cohort (incidence, 1.04/1000 person-years) received a new diagnosis of IBS. The mean follow-up period from SSRI exposure to IBS diagnosis was 2.05 years. The incidence of IBS increased with advancing age. Patients with anxiety disorders had a significantly increased adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of IBS (aHR = 1.33, 95%CI: 1.11-1.59, P = 0.002). After adjusting for sex, age, urbanization, family income, area of residence, occupation, the use of anti-psychotics and other comorbidities, the overall aHR in the SSRI cohort compared with that in the comparison cohort was 1.74 (95%CI: 1.44-2.10; P < 0.001). The cumulative incidence of IBS was higher in the SSRI cohort than in the non-SSRI cohort (log-rank test, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

SSRI users show an increased risk of subsequent diagnosis of IBS in Taiwan.

Diagnosis and management of functional symptoms in inflammatory bowel disease in remission

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients in remission may suffer from gastrointestinal symptoms that resemble irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Knowledge on this issue has increased considerably in the last decade, and it is our intention to review and summarize it in the present work. We describe a problematic that comprises physiopathological uncertainties, diagnostic difficulties, as IBS-like symptoms are very similar to those produced by an inflammatory flare, and the necessity of appropriate management of these patients, who, although in remission, have impaired quality of life. Ultimately, from almost a philosophical point of view, the presence of IBS-like symptoms in IBD patients in remission supposes a challenge to the traditional functional-organic dichotomy, suggesting the need for a change of paradigm.

Fecal calprotectin and its correlation with inflammatory markers and endoscopy in patients from India with inflammatory bowel disease

INTRODUCTION

In clinical practice, endoscopic findings are often used for assessing disease activity in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). In recent years, blood and stool markers are being increasingly used for this purpose. Among them, the fecal calprotectin (FC) level is probably the most favored. Data on the reliability of FC are lacking from countries like India, where gut infections are common.

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this study were to compare the FC level with the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and the C-reactive protein (CRP) as non-invasive markers of IBD and, in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), and to study its correlation with disease extent, clinical activity, and endoscopic severity.

METHODS

Records of patients with IBD who had tests for FC, ESR and CRP and colonoscopy done within a 2-week period, between 2012 and 2014, were retrieved. Sixty-three patients (UC 32, Crohn's disease [CD] 31) were included for analysis. ESR, CRP and FC were compared to endoscopy to assess inflammation.

RESULTS

Patients with UC had higher levels of FC than those with ileocolonic CD (median FC 800 mcg/g vs. 619 mcg/g, respectively; p = 0.04). FC levels correlated with CRP (r = 0.4, p < 0.001) but not with ESR (r = 0.21, p = 0.09). In patients with UC with endoscopic evidence of inflammation, more (86.9 %) had FC > 200 mcg/g (cut-off for disease activity in our laboratory) than had ESR >20 mm in the first hour (60.6 %) or positive CRP (65.6 %) (< 0.01); FC levels increased with increasing endoscopic Mayo score (p = 0.001) and Truelove-Witt's clinical severity score (p = 0.006), but did not correlate with disease extent (p = 0.7). The best FC cut-off level to identify 'active UC' (Mayo grade 2 or more) was 800 mcg/g.

CONCLUSION

Fecal calprotectin level correlates with CRP but not with ESR. In patients with UC with inflammation, FC > 200 mcg/g is more often positive than raised ESR or CRP; it also correlates with clinical and endoscopic activity but not with disease extent. FC level > 800 mcg/g can be used to differentiate active from inactive UC.

Pain management in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: translational approaches from bench to bedside

Abdominal pain is a common symptom in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) that negatively affects quality of life and can lead to increased health-seeking behavior. Although abdominal pain has been traditionally attributed to inflammation, there is growing literature demonstrating the existence of functional abdominal pain in patients with IBD, of which there are a variety of potential causes. Thus, when approaching a patient with IBD who has abdominal pain, in addition to IBD-related complications (e.g., inflammation/stricture), it is important to screen for related contributors, including peripheral factors (visceral hypersensitivity, bacterial overgrowth, and bowel dysmotility) and centrally mediated neurobiological and psychosocial underpinnings. These central factors include psychological symptoms/diagnoses, sleep disturbance, and stress. Opioid-induced hyperalgesia (e.g., narcotic bowel syndrome) is also growing in recognition as a potential central source of abdominal pain. This review draws from clinical studies and animal models of colitis and abdominal pain to consider how knowledge of these potential etiologies can be used to individualize treatment of abdominal pain in patients with IBD, including consideration of potential novel treatment modalities for the future. Accurate assessment of the source(s) of pain in patients with IBD can help guide appropriate diagnostic workup and use of disease-modifying therapy.

The functional-organic dichotomy: postinfectious irritable bowel syndrome and inflammatory bowel disease-irritable bowel syndrome

Gastroenterologists often encounter situations when the clinical and pathophysiological features that typically distinguish functional from organic disorders overlap. This "blurring of boundaries" can occur with post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome (PI-IBS), a subset of IBS and a newly described entity IBD-IBS. The key associating features include pain and usually diarrheal symptoms that are disproportionate to the observed pathology, microscopic inflammation, and often a co-association with psychological distress. A previous initiating gastrointestinal infection is required for PI-IBS and assumed for IBD-IBS. Using this perspective we discuss the clinical and pathophysiological features of PI-IBS and IBD-IBS and the growing evidence for the overlapping features of these two disorders in terms of alteration of gut flora, immune dysregulation, and role of stress. A unifying model of PI-IBS and IBD-IBS is proposed that may have important clinical and research implications. It obligates us to reframe our understanding of illness and disease from the dualistic biomedical model into a more integrated biopsychosocial (BPS) perspective.

Treatment of irritable bowel syndrome in outpatients with inflammatory bowel disease using a food and beverage intolerance, food and beverage avoidance diet

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) in the outpatient with chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a difficult but important challenge to recognize and treat. It is very helpful to have effective treatment approaches for IBS that are practical and use minimal medications. Because of the underlying chronic inflammation in IBD, IBS symptoms occur with increased frequency and severity, secondary to increased hypersensitivity to foods and beverages that stimulate the gastrointestinal tract. This paper discusses how to treat IBS in the IBD outpatient, with emphasis on using a food and beverage intolerance, avoidance diet. The adverse effects of many foods and beverages are amount dependent and can be delayed, additive, and cumulative. The specific types of foods and beverages that can induce IBS symptoms include milk and milk containing products; caffeine containing products; alcoholic beverages; fruits; fruit juices; spices; seasonings; diet beverages; diet foods; diet candies; diet gum; fast foods; condiments; fried foods; fatty foods; multigrain breads; sourdough breads; bagels; salads; salad dressings; vegetables; beans; red meats; gravies; spaghetti sauce; stews; nuts; popcorn; high fiber; and cookies, crackers, pretzels, cakes, and pies. The types of foods and beverages that are better tolerated include water; rice; plain pasta or noodles; baked or broiled potatoes; white breads; plain fish, chicken, turkey, or ham; eggs; dry cereals; soy or rice based products; peas; applesauce; cantaloupe; watermelon; fruit cocktail; margarine; jams; jellies; and peanut butter. Handouts that were developed based upon what worsens or helps IBS symptoms in patients are included to help patients learn which foods and beverages to avoid and which are better tolerated.

Antidepressants and inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review

Background

A number of studies have suggested a link between the patient's psyche and the course of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Although pharmacotherapy with antidepressants has not been widely explored, some investigators have proposed that treating psychological co-morbidities with antidepressants may help to control disease activity. To date a systematic analysis of the available studies assessing the efficacy of antidepressants for the control of somatic symptoms in IBD patients has not been performed.

Methods

We searched electronic databases, without any language restriction. All relevant papers issued after 1990 were examined.

Results

12 relevant publications were identified. All of them referred to non-randomised studies. Antidepressants reported in these publications included paroxetine, bupropion, amitriptyline, phenelzine, and mirtazapine. In 10 articles, paroxetine, bupropion, and phenelzine were suggested to be effective for treating both psychological and somatic symptoms in patients suffering from IBD. Amitriptyline was found ineffective for treating somatic symptoms of IBD. Mirtazapine was not recommended for IBD patients.

Conclusion

Although most of reviewed papers suggest a beneficial effect of treatment with antidepressants in patients with IBD, due to the lack of reliable data, it is impossible to judge the efficacy of antidepressants in IBD. Properly designed trials are justified and needed based upon the available uncontrolled data.