Internal rotation of the tibial component is frequent in stiff total knee arthroplasty

Curve-on-curve technique is more reliable than free-floating technique for tibial components positioning in posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty using symmetrical tibial components in varus osteoarthritis

INTRODUCTION

Malrotation of the tibial components in total knee arthroplasties is a common cause of pain and functional impairment. There are multiple methods used to establish the tibial component rotation, but there is still no consensus which method is the best.The objective of this study was to compare two of the most commonly used techniques, that is the use of self-alignment during passive range of motion (free-floating technique) versus the anterior cortex referencing method (Curve-on-curve technique).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-eight consecutive patients with advanced varus-type osteoarthritis scheduled for posterior stabilized total knee replacement with symmetrical tibial baseplate were included in the study. We set the location of the tibial component trial using the method of self-alignment during passive range of motion and compared it to the location of the tibial component trial when referenced to the anterior cortex. The distance between the two locations was independently measured by two experienced surgeons.

RESULTS

In all of the cases, the tibial component centre was located more laterally on the anterior tibial cortex in the anterior cortex referencing technique when compared to the self-alignment technique [range 3-19 mm].

CONCLUSION

The tibial components placed using the anterior referencing technique (Curve-on-curve technique) are more externally rotated as compared to those placed using the self-alignment technique (free-floating technique) in posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasties using symmetrical tibial components.

Impact of implant positions in total knee arthroplasty on the postoperative knee kinematics of tibial rotation

Introduction

In total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the implant positions and knee kinematics, as well as the manifestation of medial pivot motion, play pivotal roles in determining postoperative clinical outcomes. The purpose of the current study was to analyze the correlation between knee kinematics, which was measured during TKA and implant positions derived using computed tomography (CT) examination after TKA.

Methods

This study comprised 64 patients (76 knees) who underwent primary TKA between 2015 and 2022. A navigation system was used in TKA procedures, and intraoperative knee kinematics were automatically calculated with it. Utilizing three-dimensional evaluation software, positioning of implants was quantified with CT images taken pre- and post-operatively. Multiple regression analyses were employed to explore the impact of femoral component position (FP) and tibial component position (TP) on knee kinematics, focusing on the extent of tibial rotational motion (TRM) during passive knee motion.

Results

FP affected TRM between knee extension and 90° flexion (p = 0.003, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.315-1.384) and between knee extension and full flexion (p = 0.0002, 95 % CI: 0.654-1.844) after TKA. FP in internal rotation positively affected internal TRM after TKA. TP was not associated with TRM.

Conclusions

Findings of the current study suggest that FP in internal rotation positively impacts knee kinematics after TKA.

Revision for stiff knee after knee replacement

Stiffness following total knee replacement is defined as >15° flexion contracture and/or flexion <75° or, for other authors, arc of motion <70° or 45° or 50°. Alternatively, it could be defined as a range of motion less than the patient needs in order to be able to do what they wish. The first step in management is to determine the causes: preoperative (history of stiffness, patient-related risk factors, etc.), intraoperative (technical error: malpositioning, oversizing, overhanging, etc.), and postoperative (defective pain management and/or rehabilitation, etc.). Treatment depends on the interval since replacement and on the type of stiffness (flexion or extension), and should be multidisciplinary (surgery, rehabilitation, pain management). For intervals less than 3 months, manipulation under anesthesia gives good results for flexion. If this fails, surgery should be considered. If there was no significant technical error, arthrolysis may be indicated, and is usually arthroscopic. It is technically difficult, but has a low rate of complications. Open arthrolysis allows greater posterior release and replacement of the insert by a thinner model. In case of malpositioning or oversizing or of failure of other procedures, implant revision is the only option, although the risk of complications is high. After exposure, which is often difficult, the aim is to correct the technical errors and to restore joint-line height and two symmetrical, well-balanced spaces in extension and flexion. A semi-constrained or even hinged implant may be needed, although with uncertain lifetime for young patients in the latter case. In all cases, the patient needs to accept that treatment is going to be long, with more than the intervention itself (i.e., specific pain management and rehabilitation), and that expectations have to be reasonable as results are often imperfect. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: expert opinion.

Symmetric versus asymmetric tibial components: A systematic review of comparative studies

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a widely performed procedure that significantly enhances patients' quality of life by reducing pain and improving daily function. While the traditional tibial plate design used in TKA has been symmetrical, there has been a recent trend towards using asymmetrical designs. Our study aimed to compare symmetrical and asymmetrical tibial designs, focusing on outcomes related to overhang, malrotation, and tibial coverage.

METHODS

This systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases was carried out up to January 22nd, 2024, to identify comparative studies on symmetrical and asymmetrical designs, as well as those reporting postoperative functional and clinical outcomes. The risk of bias in the included studies was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS).

RESULTS

This systematic review included 587 patients from seven comparative studies that met the inclusion criteria. Our findings indicate that asymmetrical tibial components generally provided better outcomes in terms of tibial coverage, malrotation, and overhang. Asymmetrical designs provided greater tibial coverage and reduced posterolateral overhang compared to symmetrical designs, which is essential for minimizing complications like soft tissue irritation and patellar maltracking. Additionally, asymmetrical components were associated with less severe tibial malrotation.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review showed that asymmetrical tibial implants offer better tibial coverage, with less overhang and fewer rotational issues compared to symmetrical implants. As a result, asymmetrical designs in TKA may lower complication rates, enhance patient satisfaction, and improve quality of life post-surgery.

Total knee arthroplasty combined with simultaneous open reduction and internal fixation in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis with patellar fracture: a case report and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Patients with severe knee osteoarthritis combined with patellar fracture are rare, and it is unclear whether single-stage surgery affects the enhanced recovery after surgery.

CASE PRESENTATION

This case report describes two patients of Han nationality. A 69-year-old male patient was previously diagnosed with severe knee osteoarthritis of the left knee joint and was treated conservatively with long-term oral nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and intraarticular injection of sodium hyaluronate. He was hospitalized for acute left knee injury owing to a fall from a height. He was diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis of the left knee joint and patellar fracture. Another 74-year-old female patient was previously diagnosed with severe knee osteoarthritis, long-term oral nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and topical Chinese medicine to relieve the pain. A month ago, she fell down the stairs and fractured the patella in her left knee, she was diagnosed with severe left knee osteoarthritis combined with an old left patella fracture. Both patients were successfully treated by single-stage primary total knee arthroplasty and fixation of the patellar fracture. They both carried out early functional exercise normally and successfully achieved enhanced recovery.

CONCLUSION

Successful single stage total knee replacement with patella management can not only reduce the number of operations, but also enable patients to achieve rapid postoperative recovery. However, single stage may increase the risk of local surgical complications. Therefore, for most patients, especially those with low risk of anesthesia related complications, standard of treatment remains first fixing the patellar fracture and when the fracture is healed proceed with the total knee arthroplasty.

Internal rotational patellar resection and patella alta induced patellar maltracking in total knee arthroplasty: intraoperative measurement of the patellofemoral pressure

BACKGROUND

Anterior knee pain due to patellar maltracking following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) reduces patients' satisfaction. This study aimed to determine the patellofemoral pressure (PFP) in patients with favorable patellar tracking (FT) and impaired patellar tracking (IT) following TKA, the factors causing patellar maltracking, and the effect of lateral retinacular release (LRR) on patients with IT.

METHODS

Forty-four patients with varus knee osteoarthritis undergoing cruciate-retaining TKA were enrolled. After component implantation, patients with a separation of ≥ 2 mm of the patellar medial facet from the medial femoral trochlea throughout knee range of motion were classified into the IT group; meanwhile, the others were classified into the FT group. PFP was measured intraoperatively in three phases: (1) with the resurfaced patella (RP); (2) with the resurfaced patella and knee (RPK); and (3) when LRR was performed in IT (post-LRR). The PFPs at 0°, 90°, 120°, and 135° knee flexion were compared between FT and IT using the Mann-Whitney U test. Pairwise comparison of the PFP in IT between RPK and post-LRR was performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Correlations between PFP and pre- and postoperative radiographic parameters, such as hip-knee-ankle angle, lateral distal femoral angle, medial proximal tibial angle, anterior femoral offset, Insall-Salvati ratio (ISR), patellar tilt, and patellar resection angle (PRA), were evaluated using Spearman's rank correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

High lateral PFP in the knee flexion position led to patellar maltracking. Patients with IT (n = 24) had higher lateral and lower medial PFP than did patients with FT (n = 20) at 90°, 120°, and 135° knee flexion in RP and RPK. LRR in IT reduced the lateral PFP in the knee flexion position. PRA and ISR were correlated with the lateral PFP at no less than 90° in RP and RPK.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that internal rotational patellar resection, which resulted in a thick medial patellar remnant and a thin lateral counterpart, and patella alta were the causative factors of high lateral PFP, which induced patellar maltracking after TKA. Surgeons should avoid internal rotational patellar resection to achieve FT and perform LRR in patients with patellar maltracking.

Following the Anatomy of the Proximal Tibia With a Standard Anatomic Technique and the Use of an Asymmetrical Tibial Base Plate can Lead to a Mismatched Internal Components' Rotation in Mechanically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty

Background

Tibiofemoral components rotational congruency affects the total knee arthroplasty (TKA) success. The smart insert sensor (I-S) helps to establish tibial component rotation reciprocally to a fixed femoral rotation. We aimed (1) to validate the use of I-S as a possible tool to reach reproducible reciprocal femorotibial rotation (RftR) in TKA independently from anatomic landmarks, reducing outliers in combined and mismatched femorotibial rotation (CftR and MMftR, respectively) positioning and (2) to validate the "curve-on-curve" method for a specific type of asymmetrical tibial component.

Methods

From February 2018, we conducted a prospective case-control study including 106 patients undergoing TKA. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the method used to establish tibial component rotation: with the I-S use (group A, n = 53) and with the standard "curve-on-curve" technique (group B, n = 53). Rotational alignment was calculated using the Berger protocol with postoperative computed tomography scanning. Alignment parameters measured were tibial and femoral component rotations (tR, fR), the CftR, the MMftR, and the RftR.

Results

Intraoperative rotation measured by I-S correlated the best with RftR (r = 0.84; P < .001) at the post-operative CT scanning. No significant differences were found between groups A and B regarding all types of rotation (fR: P = .774; tR: P = .467; CftR: P = .847) except for MMftR (P = .036) and RftR (P = .023). There were no outliers in group A but 27 and 12 outliers in group B for MMftR and CftR respectively (P < .001; P = .032).

Conclusions

The TKA components' rotation established using a smart I-S intraoperatively is ascribable to the RftR at postoperative computed tomography scan. The I-S helps reduce outliers in the CftR and MMftR. An asymmetrical tibial base plate implanted using the curve-on-curve technique does not create a neutral reciprocal femorotibial rotation significantly increasing the number of cases with mismatched femorotibial internal rotation.

Long-term results of a rotationally unconstrained fixed-bearing total knee prosthesis

PURPOSE

Introduced in the market in 1990 by Ceraver (France), the posterior-stabilised (PS) Hermes prosthesis has limited literature regarding long-term survivability. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the survival and functional outcomes of the prosthesis.

METHODS

A retrospective case series was performed including 164 patients (176 knees) having undergone total knee arthroplasty with the Hermes prosthesis between 1997 and 2000 with a follow-up period of 18 years.

RESULTS

Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a survival rate of 99.4% (95% CI. 96.0-100.0%) at 18.4 years with one revision. At final follow-up, the International Knee Society (IKS) functional score was 93.2 ± 15.6 and IKS knee score was 99.1 ± 2.5.

CONCLUSION

The Hermes PS model is a low conformity prosthesis that offers reliable durability that is comparable to other popular designs while minimizing rotational constraints and having an approachable learning curve for new users.

Coronal Knee Alignment and Tibial Rotation in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Cohort Study of Patients with End-Stage Osteoarthritis

Several studies have found a relationship between the rotational anatomy of the distal femur and the overall coronal lower limb alignment in knees with osteoarthritis (OA). Less is known about the rotation of the proximal tibia, especially in the context of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), where one of the goals of the surgery is to achieve the appropriate component-to-component rotation. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the coronal alignment of the lower extremity and the relative proximal tibial rotation. A prospective cohort study of patients with an end-stage OA scheduled for TKA was conducted. All patients underwent a computed tomography (CT) scan and a standing X-ray of both lower limbs. A relative femorotibial rotation was measured separately for mechanical and kinematic alignment. A statistically significant correlation was found between the tibial varus and the external tibial rotation (p < 0.001). Out of 14 knees with high tibial varus (>5°), 13 (93%) and 7 (50%) knees had >10° of femorotibial rotation for the mechanical and kinematic alignment landmarks, respectively. In order to keep the component-to-component rotation within the 10° margin, more internal rotation of the tibial component is required in knees with higher tibial varus.

Prediction of knee biomechanics with different tibial component malrotations after total knee arthroplasty: conventional machine learning vs. deep learning

The precise alignment of tibiofemoral components in total knee arthroplasty is a crucial factor in enhancing the longevity and functionality of the knee. However, it is a substantial challenge to quickly predict the biomechanical response to malrotation of tibiofemoral components after total knee arthroplasty using musculoskeletal multibody dynamics models. The objective of the present study was to conduct a comparative analysis between a deep learning method and four conventional machine learning methods for predicting knee biomechanics with different tibial component malrotation during a walking gait after total knee arthroplasty. First, the knee contact forces and kinematics with different tibial component malrotation in the range of ±5° in the three directions of anterior/posterior slope, internal/external rotation, and varus/valgus rotation during a walking gait after total knee arthroplasty were calculated based on the developed musculoskeletal multibody dynamics model. Subsequently, deep learning and four conventional machine learning methods were developed using the above 343 sets of biomechanical data as the dataset. Finally, the results predicted by the deep learning method were compared to the results predicted by four conventional machine learning methods. The findings indicated that the deep learning method was more accurate than four conventional machine learning methods in predicting knee contact forces and kinematics with different tibial component malrotation during a walking gait after total knee arthroplasty. The deep learning method developed in this study enabled quickly determine the biomechanical response with different tibial component malrotation during a walking gait after total knee arthroplasty. The proposed method offered surgeons and surgical robots the ability to establish a calibration safety zone, which was essential for achieving precise alignment in both preoperative surgical planning and intraoperative robotic-assisted surgical navigation.

Maintenance of the joint line and posterior condylar offset are the most notable variables for successful outcomes of revision total knee arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Controversy regarding which variables should be prioritized for better outcomes in revision total knee arthroplasty (RTKA) exists. This study aimed to comprehensively analyze the variables affecting RTKA outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively identified 87 RTKAs in 82 patients who were performed between March 2014 and February 2020. Range of motion (ROM), including flexion contracture (FC) and further flexion (FF), was analyzed according to the covariates. The covariates included mode of failure, joint line position, anteroposterior (AP) position, rotational alignment of the femoral component, and patellofemoral alignment. The differences between the final follow-up values of each RTKA variable and those of the native knee were evaluated. The clinical outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed between the joint line positions of the RTKA and native knees. The patellar and AP positions of the femoral component were restored to pre-TKA values. The femoral component had an external rotation of 2.78° compared with the native knee. In multivariable stepwise regression analysis, restoration of the adductor tubercle joint line and posterior condylar offset (PCO) were significant variables affecting ROM. Septic RTKA (33 knees) resulted in poor FF outcomes (p = 0.030) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index stiffness (WOMAC S) scores (p < 0.001), compared with aseptic RTKA (54 knees).

CONCLUSIONS

Restoration of the joint line position and PCO are crucial factors for improved ROM in RTKA. Joint line elevation in RTKA resulted in worse ROM than joint line lowering. In addition, RTKA due to septic failure had inferior ROM and WOMAC S scores compared with RTKA due to aseptic failure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, cohort study.

The use of an anatomic tibial baseplate in total knee arthroplasty optimizes coverage without compromising rotation: A propensity-matched evaluation

BACKGROUND

The aims of this study were (1) to compare in vivo coverage and rotational alignment of 2 tibial component designs: anatomic and symmetrical; and (2) to determine if coronal deformity and tibial torsion were related to rotation and coverage.

METHODS

Postoperative CT scans of 200 propensity score-matched patients who underwent TKA with either an anatomic (ATC) or symmetrical tibia component (STC) were analyzed. Rotation was measured using four axes: surgical transepicondylar axis (sTEA), Berger's protocol, medio-lateral (ML) axis and posterior borders of the tibial plateau, while coverage was assessed by measuring fit and surface area. The relationship between coronal deformity, tibial torsion, rotation, and coverage was investigated.

RESULTS

Overall, STCs had more internal rotation when measured using the sTEA (-0.6° ± 3.5 vs 0.5° ± 3.6, p = 0.03), Berger's protocol (-21.6° ± 7.1 vs -17.9° ± 6.2, p = 0.000) and ML axes (2.9° ± 3.9 vs 8.1° ± 5.1, p = 0.000) compared to ATCs. STCs also had more posteromedial underhang (-3.3 mm ± 2.4 mm vs -1.7 mm ± 2.5 mm, p = 0.000) but smaller change in tibial torsion postoperatively (-18.4° ± 9.9° vs -13.1° ± 9.4°, p = 0.000). Tibial torsion was more pronounced in valgus than varus knees both preoperative (-25.4° ± 6.5° vs -20.2° ± 9.3°, p = 0.02) and postoperatively (-19.7° ± 7.2° vs -14.7° ± 10.3°, p = 0.04), but there was no difference in postoperative tibial torsion between ATCs and STCs in this subgroup.

CONCLUSION

The use of an anatomic tibial baseplate optimizes coverage by reducing posterolateral overhang and posteromedial underhang. It also achieved better rotational profiles compared to STCs. However, it resulted in a larger change in tibial torsion after TKA.

Novel morphogenic knee implant delivers comparable mid-term outcomes as compared to conventional non-morphogenic implants

INTRODUCTION

Conventional total knee arthroplasty (C-TKA) implants have well-established mid- and long-term outcomes. The novel TKA (N-TKA) implants provide morphogenic implant components with smaller size increments to facilitate anatomical replication. The aim of the study is to evaluate if these advantages provides better clinical outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Registry data prospectively collected within a single institution from 2014 to 2018 was reviewed and propensity score matching was performed to match C-TKA to N-TKA. 70 pairs of cruciate retaining (CR) TKA and 116 pairs of posterior stabilized (PS) TKA were identified. Range of motion, SF-36, Knee Society Knee Score (KSKS), Knee Society Function Score (KSFS) and Oxford Knee Score (OKS) were assessed preoperatively, 6 and 24 months postoperatively. Satisfaction was assessed 6 and 24 months postoperatively. Independent T test was performed for parametric data, whereas Wilcoxon rank-sum analysis was performed for non-parametric data.

RESULTS

Both C-TKA and N-TKA cohorts demonstrated statistically significant improvement for KSKS, KSFS, OKS and SF-36 at 6 and 24 months postoperatively. C-TKA CR patients had better flexion at 6 months as compared to N-TKA CR (108.7° versus 98.3°, respectively, p = 0.046). At 24 months, there was no difference between C-TKA and N-TKA for range of motion, KSKS, KSFS, OKS and SF-36 PCS, regardless of insert type (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Both models showed great postoperative improvements in KSFS, KSKS, OKS and SF-36 and have comparable early and mid-term outcomes, suggesting that N-TKAs are suitable substitutes for C-TKA. Longer follow-up studies are required to evaluate the long-term outcomes of N-TKAs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

lll.

Relationship between the Femoral and Tibial Component Positions and Postoperative Knee Range of Motion after Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty in Varus-Aligned Knees

This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between the femoral and tibial component positions and postoperative knee range of motion after posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Forty-four patients (48 knees in total: 9 men, 9 knees; 35 women, 39 knees) who underwent posterior-stabilized TKA using a navigation system were included. The femoral and tibial component positions were measured from the preoperative and postoperative computed tomography data with three-dimensional evaluation software. We investigated the relationship between the knee range of motion, including extension restriction and maximum flexion angles at 2 years postoperatively, and the femoral and tibial component positions. Patients with knee extension restriction of 10° or more at 2 years postoperatively showed greater posterior flexion position of the tibial component than those with knee extension restriction less than 10° (6.2° and 3.9°, respectively, p=0.018). The postoperative knee flexion angle was positively associated with the internal rotational position of the femoral component (p=0.032, 95% confidence interval: 0.105-2.178). Patients with a knee flexion angle more than 120° at 2 years postoperatively had greater internal rotational position of the femoral component than those with 120° or less (5.2° and 1.5°, respectively, p=0.002). In conclusions, after posterior-stabilized TKA, the postoperative knee extension restriction angle was associated with the posterior flexion position of the tibial component, and the knee flexion angle was positively related to the internal rotational position of the femoral component.

Association between pre- and postoperative rotational mismatches of the femorotibial components and bones in bi-cruciate retaining and posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty

To clarify the association between pre- and postoperative rotational mismatches of the femorotibial components and bones for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with bi-cruciate retaining (BCR) design and with fixed bearing posterior stabilized (PS) design. This retrospective cohort study included 40 BCR TKAs and 50 PS TKAs. Pre- and postoperative rotational mismatches of the femorotibial components and bones were measured by three-dimensional assessment based on computed tomography imaging. The mean value and percentage within ± 5° of pre- and postoperative rotational mismatches were compared between BCR TKA and PS TKA. Correlations between pre- and postoperative rotational mismatches of the femorotibial components and bones were investigated in BCR TKA and PS TKA. There was no significant difference in mean preoperative rotational mismatch of femorotibial components and bones between BCR TKA and PS TKA. Mean postoperative rotational mismatch of femorotibial components and bones was significantly greater in BCR TKA than in PS TKA. Postoperative rotational mismatch of the femorotibial components was within ± 5° in 21 knees (52.5%) for BCR TKA and in 43 knees (86.0%) for PS TKA. The rate of postoperative rotational mismatch of the femorotibial components and bones within ± 5° was significantly lower for BCR TKA than for PS TKA. In BCR TKA, there was a positive correlation between pre- and postoperative rotational mismatches of the femorotibial components and of bones. We consider these results can be attributed to the retention of both cruciate ligaments, which may affect the reduction of rotational permittance of the components and bones.

Curve-on-curve technique does not improve tibial coverage in total knee arthroplasty in comparison to tibial tuberosity technique with use of anatomical implants: randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

During the last years, main attention while performing total knee replacement was paid to femoral component alignment; however, there is still lack of studies concerning tibial baseplate rotational alignment, especially in terms of anatomical designs of knee prosthesis. Some recent studies proved that tibial baseplate malrotation might be a cause of knee pain and patients' dissatisfaction. The aim of this study was to compare tibial component rotation and its coverage on the tibial plateau achieved with curve-on-curve and tibial tuberosity techniques (t-t technique) with use of anatomic knee designs with asymmetric tibial baseplate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 88 patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo total knee arthroplasty with use of the PERSONA PS (Zimmer Biomet) knee design with an asymmetric baseplate. The rotation of the tibial component was assessed and performed with two different techniques: curve-on-curve technique and tibial tuberosity technique. Tibial component rotation was measured on computed tomography (CT) scans using the method suggested by Benazzo et al. and designed for asymmetrical implants. For the measurement of the tibial bone coverage, the component surface area was outlined and measured on a proper CT section, then the tibial cut surface area was outlined and measured on a section just below the cement level. Pre- and post-operative range of motion was measured by another independent researcher 12 months post-operatively during follow-up visit.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant difference between both groups in median value of tibial rotation angle: 7° (interquartile range (IQR) = 0-12) in curve-on-curve technique group vs 2° (IQR-1-7) in tibial tuberosity technique group, probability value (p) = 0.0041, with values above 0 meaning external rotation of the component. There was no statistically significant difference between both groups in terms of range of motion (ROM) with average values of 124.3° ± 13.0° for curve-on-curve technique and 125.6° ± 12.8° for t-t technique with p = 0.45. There was a statistically insignificant difference between both groups in terms of coverage percentage in slight favor for curve-on-curve technique (85.9 ± 4.2 vs 84.5 ± 4.8, p = 0.17).

CONCLUSION

In this study, no difference between the groups in terms of tibial bone coverage and range of motion was proved, even though both techniques differed significantly with values of tibial rotation. Future studies should be focused on influence of specific values of tibial rotation on patient-reported outcomes and survivorship of anatomic knee implants.

Combined femoral and tibial component total knee arthroplasty device rotation measurement is reliable and predicts clinical outcome

BACKGROUND

The optimal total knee arthroplasty (TKA) rotational alignment and how best to obtain and measure it are debatable. The aim was to analyse the reliability of the Berger femoral, three different tibial and four different combined two-dimensional computer tomography (2D-CT) TKA component rotation measurements, and to ascertain which rotational values best predict a successful clinical outcome.

METHODS

The 2D-CT scans were obtained post-operatively on 60 patients who had TKA. We determined one femoral [Berger's femoral angle (BFA)], three tibial [Berger's tibial angle (BTA), anatomical tibial angle (ATA) and bimalleolar posterior tibial component angle (BM_PTCA)] and four combined [transepicondylar posterior tibial component angle (TE_PTCA), bicondylar posterior tibial component angle (BC_PTCA, transepicondylar bimalleolar angle (TE_BM) and bicondylar bimalleolar angle (BC_BM)] TKA rotation angles. We made all measures in 23 patients twice by three observers and determined inter- and intra-observer agreement using the Bland-Altman plot method. We analysed measures of 55 patients using the area under the ROC curve (AUC) analysis to ascertain the discriminative capacity of BFA, ATA, TE_PTCA and BC_PTCA for predicting a successful clinical outcome according to the Knee Society Score (KSS) threshold.

RESULTS

ATA showed the smaller inter- and intra-observer average of differences (-0.1° and 1.6°, respectively) of the studied methods followed by BFA (-0.9° and 1.4°), TE_PTCA (-2.1° and 2.7°) and BC_PTCA (-0.5° and 1.8°). BFA (-4° to 2.1° and -6.1° to 8.8°) and BC_PTCA (-4.4° to 3.4° and -7.9° to 4.4°) showed the narrower inter- and intra-observer limits of agreement. A TKA device rotation (BC_PTCA) < 0.8° of external rotation (ER) predicted a KSS and KSS knee successful outcome, and < 3.8° ER for KSS functional (AUC = 0.889; 0.907 and 0.764, respectively). BFA and ATA < 0.9° ER and < 3.9° internal rotation (IR) predicted a successful KSS knee outcome (AUC = 0.796 and 0.889, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The ATA tibial component rotation measurement was the most reliable of those studied. BFA, TE_PTCA and BC_PTCA were reliable measures for TKA femoral and combined rotation. The presence of a minimal rotation between the TKA components (BC_PTCA) and a small femoral ER or tibial IR predicted a successful KSS outcome.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II

Conformity design can change the effect of tibial component malrotation on knee biomechanics after total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Component alignment is essential to improve knee function and survival in total knee arthroplasty. However, it is still unclear whether the conformity design of tibiofemoral component can mitigate abnormal knee biomechanics caused by component malrotation. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the sagittal/coronal conformity design of the tibial component could change the effect of the tibial component malrotation on knee biomechanics in total knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

A developed patient-specific musculoskeletal multi-body dynamics model of total knee arthroplasty was used to investigate the effects of the sagittal/coronal conformity of the tibial component on knee contact forces and kinematics caused by tibial component malrotation during the walking gait.

FINDINGS

Medial and lateral contact forces, internal-external rotation, and anterior-posterior translation were significantly affected by tibial component malrotation after total knee arthroplasty during the walking gait. The lower sagittal conformity of the tibial component can mitigate the abnormal internal-external rotation caused by tibial component malrotation in total knee arthroplasty, the higher coronal conformity of the tibial component can mitigate the abnormal medial-lateral translation caused by tibial component malrotation in total knee arthroplasty.

INTERPRETATION

This study highlights the importance of the tibiofemoral conformity designs on knee biomechanics caused by component malrotation in total knee arthroplasty. The optimization of the tibiofemoral conformity designs should be thoroughly considered in the design of new implants and in the planning of surgical procedures.

Component Rotation in Well-Functioning, Gap-Balanced Total Knee Arthroplasty without Navigation

INTRODUCTION

Malalignment of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) components is a potential cause of clinical failure following TKA. Since the goal of a gap-balancing (GB) technique is equal flexion and extension gaps secondary to soft-tissue balancing, and not necessarily component alignment, variation in component placement may exist. Our purpose was (1) to evaluate precision of component alignment in well-functioning GB TKAs performed without the aid of navigation using computed tomographic (CT) evaluation and (2) to determine any relationship between femoral version and/or tibial torsion and TKA component positioning.

METHODS

There were 93 well-functioning TKAs performed with an extension gap first GB technique with a minimum 2-year follow-up evaluated using CT to assess component rotational alignment, as well as osseous femoral version and tibial torsion. Femoral and tibial rotational alignment was assessed by previously described methods.

RESULTS

The mean Knee Society Score was 185.7 ± 21.7. Mean range of motion was 128.5 ± 7.8°. Femoral postero-condylar axis (relative to the transepicondylar axis) values ranged from -8.3 to 4.1° with a mean of -0.78 ± 2.7° (internal rotation). Mean tibial rotation was 17.2 ± 7.9° internal rotation relative to the tibial tubercle. No correlation was found between native femoral version and femoral component rotational alignment (Pearson's correlation coefficient, r, 0.007). Weak correlation was found between native tibial torsion and tibial component alignment (r = 0.24).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite being only a secondary objective with the GB technique, most components evaluated were within the desired range of rotation. Alignment was not influenced by native osseous rotational geometry.

The language of knee alignment : updated definitions and considerations for reporting outcomes in total knee arthroplasty

Orthopaedic surgeons are currently faced with an overwhelming number of choices surrounding total knee arthroplasty (TKA), not only with the latest technologies and prostheses, but also fundamental decisions on alignment philosophies. From 'mechanical' to 'adjusted mechanical' to 'restricted kinematic' to 'unrestricted kinematic' - and how constitutional alignment relates to these - there is potential for ambiguity when thinking about and discussing such concepts. This annotation summarizes the various alignment strategies currently employed in TKA. It provides a clear framework and consistent language that will assist surgeons to compare confidently and contrast the concepts, while also discussing the latest opinions about alignment in TKA. Finally, it provides suggestions for applying consistent nomenclature to future research, especially as we explore the implications of 3D alignment patterns on patient outcomes.Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(2):102-108.

Medial-lateral translational malalignment of the prosthesis on tibial stress distribution in total knee arthroplasty: A finite element analysis

Background: Poor prosthesis alignment during total knee arthroplasty could cause problems such as polyethylene spacer wear, leading to surgical failure and revision surgery. The problems caused by the malalignment of the tibial plateau prosthesis in the medial and lateral planes are unclear. We aimed to investigate the stress distribution and micromotion of the tibia when the tibial plateau prosthesis is translated 1 and 2 mm medially and laterally, respectively, using finite element analysis (FEA). Method: A non-homogeneous tibia model was created and load conditions when standing on two legs were applied using FEA to simulate the misaligned prosthesis. The stresses, stress distribution, and micromotion of the proximal tibia were analyzed in five positions of the tibial plateau prosthesis: Lateral-2 mm; Lateral-1 mm; Medium; Medial-2 mm; Medial-1 mm. Result: The maximum stress in the five groups with different misalignments of the platform was 47.29 MPa (Lateral-2 mm). The maximum micromotion among the five groups in different positions was 7.215 μm (Lateral-2 mm). Conclusion: When placing the tibial plateau prosthesis during total knee arthroplasty, an error of 2 mm or less is acceptable as long as it does not overhang.

Comparison of Tibial Tubercle Landmark Technique and Range of Motion Technique in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

There is not a standard for rotational alignment of the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). For now, the most commonly methods are tibial-tubercle -landmark technique (TTL) and range-of-motion technique (ROM). The study is aimed to compare clinical outcomes and radiographic data of patients who undergone primary TKA with TTL or ROM technique.

METHODS

This single-surgeon retrospective cohort study includes 60 patients with TTL technique and 60 with ROM technique from December 2017 to January 2019. All patients were evaluated clinically using Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Score (HSS), Feller patellar score, visual analogue scale (VAS) and maximum knee flexion and extension angle before and after surgery at both 6 months and 12 months postoperatively. Radiographic data contain hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA), posterior slope angle (PSA) on pre and postoperative X-ray and rotation angle of femoral component (relative to surgical trans-epicondylar axis) and tibial component (relative to surgical trans-epicondylar axis, tibial posterior condylar line and Akagi') on postoperative computed tomography (CT) scan. Clinical outcomes and radiological data were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty patients (120 knees) were enrolled in this study, including 38 males and 82 females, aged from 58 to 78, with an average of 65.7 years. There was no significant difference in demographics and preoperative X-ray data between the two groups (P > 0. 05). Clinical scores of the TTL group were better than those in the ROM group at 6 and 12 months after surgery, when comparing HSS (83.57 ± 5.00 vs 75.90 ± 4.89, F = 59.004, P < 0.001; 90.53 ± 4.31 vs 82.83 ± 4.98, F = 54.509, P < 0.001), Feller patellar score (21.43 ± 2.54 vs 19.10 ± 2.52, F = 14.864, P = 0.001; 26.27 ± 1.98 vs 23.20 ± 2.31, F = 42.204, P < 0.001) and VAS (3.70 ± 0.62 vs 4.38 ± 0.92, F = 14.508, P = 0.001; 2.10 ± 0.90 vs 2.79 ± 0.80, F = 11.554, P = 0.002). But there was no significant difference in the flexion and extension angle between the two groups. In imaging evaluation, no statistical difference was found in pre- and postoperative HKA, mLDFA, mMPTA and PSA. Rotational angles of tibial component only did relative to Akagi' have statistical difference in two groups (2.33 ± 4.3 vs 4.41 ± 3.2, t = 2.143, P < 0.05) (Positive value represented external rotation).

CONCLUSION

The results of our study showed that both methods were reliable, and TTL technique provided better clinical scores and larger external angle of tibial component, compared to ROM technique.

Optimal intraoperative medial joint gap in extension to prevent flexion contracture following total knee arthroplasty using modified gap balancing technique

Background

Primary aim to identify the ideal medial joint gap in extension needed to prevent post-operative flexion contracture following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in varus osteoarthritic knees by the modified gap balancing technique. A secondary aim was to analyze multiple factors that influence knee extension in TKA by modified gap balancing.

Methods

This is a prospective cohort study of 150 patients diagnosed with osteoarthritic varus knee who underwent TKA using the modified gap balancing technique. Operative and clinical records were assessed to determine factors including age, BMI (Body mass index), pre-operative extension angle and the medial extension laxity. Patients were followed for 6-months post-operatively and reviewed for knee extension angle.

Results

Six months final follow-up information was available for 148 patients with an average age of 75.5 years. Pre-operative knee extension and BMI were significantly associated with post-operative knee extension. Post-operative flexion contracture of ≧ 100 was not seen in any of 34 patients with a medial extension laxity ≧ 0 mm who had no pre-existing flexion contracture, and in 1/9 (11.1%) patients with a medial extension laxity ≧ 1 mm who had pre-existing flexion contracture.

Conclusions

Pre-operative extension angle and BMI significantly influence the post-operative knee extension angle in TKA using the modified gap balancing technique. A medial extension laxity of at least 1 mm is ideally needed to prevent post-operative flexion contracture in patients with a pre-existing contracture ≧ 100.

Level of evidence

Level II; Prospective cohort study.

Machine Learning Algorithm to Predict Worsening of Flexion Range of Motion After Total Knee Arthroplasty

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Different rotational alignment of tibial component should be selected for varied tibial tubercle locations in total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The main purpose of this study was to identify how the accuracy of the tibial rotation reference axes varied in populations with different tibial tubercle locations. We hypothesized that the accuracy of the axes of tibial rotation would be affected by the changes of tibial tubercle locations.

METHODS

Surgical epicondylar axis (SEA), medial third of the patellar tendon (1/3MPT), medial third of the tibial tuberosity (1/3MTT), medial border of the tibial tuberosity (MTT) and Akagi line were drawn. The angle between SEA and horizontal line with the angle between the four tibial rotation axes and the horizontal line was compared by T test. Then, the correlation between TTTG with the angles between the four axes and SEA vertical lines was analyzed. The TTTG was divided into three subgroups (TTTG < 10 mm, 10 mm ≤ TTTG < 15 mm, TTTG ≥ 15 mm), then t test was performed for the angles between the vertical lines of the SEA and the four rotation axes of the tibia in each group.

RESULTS

Among the four tibial rotation axes, only the difference between MTT and the line perpendicular to SEA had no statistical significance (NS.). The four tibial rotational axes were all positively correlated with TTTG (p < 0.001). When TTTG ≥ 15 mm, Akagi line was 2.5° ± 6.9°internally rotated to the line perpendicular to SEA, while the 1/3MPT and MTT was 0.9° ± 5.3°and 1.3° ± 5.9°externally rotated to the line perpendicular to the SEA when TTTG < 10 mm and 10 mm ≤ TTTG < 15 mm, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

MTT showed the best consistency with SEA. TT-TG had a significant positive correlation with all four tibial rotational axes. In patients with TTTG < 10 mm, 10 mm ≤ TTTG < 15 mm and TTTG ≥ 15 mm, the 1/3MPT, MTT and Akagi line demonstrated good alignment consistency with SEA, respectively.

Failure modes in malrotated total knee replacement

PURPOSE

Achieving normal rotational alignment of both components in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is essential for improved knee survivorship and function. However, malrotation is a known complication resulting in higher revision rates. Understanding malrotation of the components and its concomitant clinical and functional outcomes are important for early diagnosis and management. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of malrotation on clinical outcomes and failure modes in both single and combined rotational malalignment.

METHODS

From our hospital database of 364 revisions, a cohort of 76 knees with patellar maltracking, stiffness, reduced range of motion and early aseptic failure were reviewed and investigated for component malrotation using computed tomography following Berger protocol. CT findings confirmed component malrotation in 70 of these patients. Investigations included (1) measurement of femoral component malrotation using surgical transepicondylar axis, (2) measurement of tibial component malrotation using anteroposterior axis and (3) measurement of combined component rotational errors.

RESULTS

The correlation of CT analysis and clinical outcomes after primary TKA revealed association of patellar maltracking with femoral internal rotation, pain and instability with tibial internal rotation and knee stiffness in patients with combined component malrotation as the commonest mode of presentation. Our study showed that patients with isolated femoral, tibial and combined malrotation presented at a mean period of 3.4 ± 1.34, 1.7 ± 0.8 and 2.3 ± 0.69 years, respectively, after the index surgery. Post-revision, the mean Knee Society Score and Oxford Knee Score improved from 29.1 to 78.7, and 10.5 to 32.8, respectively, and the mean range of motion improved from 74.9 ± 24.8 to 97.1 ± 12.7 degrees at a mean follow-up of 42 months.

CONCLUSION

Early detection of malrotation in TKA and its management with revision of both components can lead to better clinical and functional outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Computer-assisted surgery and patient-specific instrumentation improve the accuracy of tibial baseplate rotation in total knee arthroplasty compared to conventional instrumentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To determine whether patient-specific instrumentation (PSI), computer-assisted surgery (CAS) or robot-assisted surgery (RAS) enable more accurate rotational alignment of the tibial baseplate in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) compared to conventional instrumentation, in terms of deviation from the planned target and the proportion of outliers from the target zone.

METHODS

The authors independently conducted three structured electronic literature searches using the PubMed, Embase®, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases from 2007 to 2020. Studies were included if they compared rotational alignment of the tibial baseplate during TKA using conventional instrumentation versus PSI, CAS, and/or RAS, and reported deviation from preoperatively planned rotational alignment of the tibial baseplate in terms of absolute angles and/or number of outliers. Methodological quality of eligible studies was assessed by two researchers according to the Downs and Black Quality Checklist for Health Care Intervention Studies.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies, that reported on 2925 knees, were eligible for this systematic review, of which 6 studies used PSI, and 9 used CAS. No studies were found for RAS. Of the studies that reported on angular deviation from preoperatively planned rotational alignment, most found smaller deviations using PSI (0.5° to 1.4°) compared to conventional instrumentation (1.0° to 1.6°). All studies that reported on proportions of outliers from a target zone (± 3°), found lower rates of outliers using PSI (0 to 22%) compared to conventional instrumentation (5 to 96%). Most studies reported smaller angular deviation from preoperatively planned rotational alignment using CAS (0.1° to 6.9°) compared to conventional instrumentation (1.1° to 7.8°). Of the studies that reported on proportions of outliers from a target zone (± 3°), most found fewer outliers using CAS (10 to 61%) compared to conventional instrumentation (17 to 78%).

CONCLUSION

This systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that both CAS and PSI can improve the accuracy of rotational alignment of the tibial baseplate by decreasing angular deviation from the preoperatively planned target and reducing the proportion of outliers from the target zone. The clinical relevance is that PSI and CAS can improve alignment, though the thresholds necessary to grant better outcomes and survival remain unclear.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Cemented Patellar Implant Malposition: A Non-Issue for the Painful Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Non-optimal patellofemoral relationships may influence treatment decisions during revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We performed this study to determine whether patellar implant malposition or patellar tilt is associated with inferior patient-reported outcome scores or patient satisfaction after primary TKA.

METHODS

We identified 396 TKA patients (439 knees) from an institutional registry who had undergone patellar resurfacing, with preoperative and 6-week postoperative radiographs available, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) completed at least 1 year after surgery (mean 505 days). Preoperative patient demographic characteristics, patient-reported expectations, National Institutes of Health - Patient Reported Outcomes Measurements Instrument Systems global health, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement, and University of California Los Angeles activity scores were compared between 60 TKAs performed with non-optimal patellofemoral relationships (36 patellar implant malposition, 24 patellar tilt) and 379 TKAs performed with optimal patellar implant placement.

RESULTS

There were no differences between the 2 cohorts regarding demographic features, preoperative radiographic disease severity, expectations, and PROMs; or postoperative tibiofemoral component alignment, PROMs, and patient-reported satisfaction (P = .48). Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement improved similarly (P = .62) for patients with optimal resurfacing (48.5-77.6 points) and non-optimal resurfacing (47.7-76.6 points). A similar proportion of optimal and suboptimal resurfaced patients reported being satisfied with their TKA (92.7% vs 88.1%, P = .29).

CONCLUSION

Although suboptimal patellofemoral relationships may prompt treatment considerations during revision TKA, the data obtained from this study do not suggest that patellar implant malposition or patellar tilt independently contribute to postoperative pain, functional limitation, or dissatisfaction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

This is a level III, retrospective cohort study.

Gender differences affect the location of the patellar tendon attachment site for tibial rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty

Purpose

This study was carried out to investigate the accuracy of referring different locations of the patellar tendon attachment site and the geometrical center of the osteotomy surface for tibial rotational alignment and observe the influences of gender differences on the results.

Methods

Computed tomography scans of 135 osteoarthritis patients (82 females and 53 males) with varus deformity was obtained to reconstruct three-dimensional (3D) models preoperatively. The medial boundary, medial one-sixth, and medial one-third of the patellar tendon attachment site were marked on the tibia. These points were projected on the tibial osteotomy plane and connected to the geometrical center (GC) of the osteotomy plane or the middle of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) to construct six tibial rotational axes (Akagi line, MBPT, MSPT1, MSPT2, MTPT1 and MTPT2). The mismatch angle between the vertical line of the SEA projected on the proximal tibial osteotomy surface and six different reference axes was measured. In additional, the effect of gender differences on rotational alignment for tibial component were assessed.

Results

Relative to the SEA, rotational mismatch angles were − 1.8° ± 5.1° (Akagi line), − 2.5° ± 5.3° (MBPT), 2.8° ± 5.3° (MSPT1), 4.5° ± 5.4° (MSPT2), 7.3° ± 5.4° (MTPT1), and 11.6° ± 5.8° (MTPT2) for different tibial rotational axes in all patients. All measurements differed significantly between the male and female. The tibial rotational axes with the least mean absolute deviation for the female or male were Akagi line or MSPT, respectively. There was no significant difference in whether the GC of the osteotomy surface or the midpoint of PCL termination was chosen as the posterior anatomical landmark when the medial boundary or medial one-sixth point of the patellar tendon attachment site was selected as the anterior anatomical landmark.

Conclusion

When referring patellar tendon attachment site as anterior anatomical landmarks for tibial rotational alignment, the influence of gender difference on the accuracy needs to be taken into account. The geometric center of the tibial osteotomy plane can be used as a substitute for the middle of the PCL termination when reference the medial boundary or medial one-sixth of the patellar tendon attachment site.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-022-03248-5.

Moderate External Rotation of Tibial Component Generates More Natural Kinematics Than Internal Rotation After Total Knee Arthroplasty

This study aimed to investigate the influence of tibial malrotation on knee kinematics after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A symmetric fixed-bearing posterior-stabilized prosthesis was implanted in the validated knee model with different rotational alignments of the tibial component (neutral, 3° external rotation, 5° external rotation, 3° internal rotation, and 5° internal rotation). Computational kinematic simulations were used to evaluate the postoperative kinematics of the knee joint including anteroposterior translation femoral condyles and axial rotation of tibial component during 0°–135° knee flexion. The results revealed that the neutral position of the tibial component was not the closest kinematics to the intact knee, the model with 5° external rotation of the tibial component showed the closest lateral condyle translation and tibial axial rotation, and moderate external rotation could improve the kinematics after TKA.

[Accuracy of patellar tendon at the attachment as anatomic landmark for rotational alignment of tibial component]

Objective

To investigate the accuracy of the modified Akagi line which referenced the patellar tendon at the attachment and the geometrical center point of the tibial osteotomy surface for tibial rotational alignment.

Methods

Between July 2021 and December 2021, 72 patients who underwent three-dimension (3D) CT for varus osteoarthritis knees were enrolled. Among 72 patients, 18 were male and 54 were female with a mean age of 64.9 years (range, 47-84 years). The preoperative hip-knee-ankle angle ranged from 0° to 26°, with a mean of 9.3°. CT images were imported into Mimics 21.0 medical image control system to establish 3D models of the knees. The prominent point of lateral epicondyle and the medial epicondylar sulcus were identified in femoral 3D models to construct the surgical transepicondylar axis and the vertical line of its projection [anteroposterior (AP) axis]. In tibial 3D models, the patellar tendon at the attachment was used as anatomical landmarks to construct rotational alignment for tibial component, including the line connecting the medial border of the patellar tendon at the attachment (C) and the middle (O) of the posterior cruciate ligament insertion (Akagi line), the line connecting the point C and the geometric center (GC) of the tibial osteotomy plane [medial border axis of the patellar tendon (MBPT)], the line connecting the medial sixth point of the patellar tendon at the attachment and the point GC [medial sixth axis of the patellar tendon (MSPT)], the line connecting the medial third point of the patellar tendon at the attachment and point O [medial third axis of the patellar tendon 1 (MTPT1)], and the line connecting the medial third point of the patellar tendon at the attachment and point GC [medial third axis of the patellar tendon 2 (MTPT2)]. The angles between the five reference axes and the AP axis were measured, and the distribution of the rotational mismatch angles with the AP axis was counted (≤3°, 3°-5°, 5°-10°, and >10°).

Results

Relative to the AP axis, the Akagi line and MBPT were internally rotated (1.6±5.9)° and (2.4±6.9)°, respectively, while MSPT, MTPT1, and MTPT2 were externally rotated (5.4±6.6)°, (7.0±5.8)°, and (11.9±6.6)°, respectively. There were significant differences in the rotational mismatch angle and its distribution between reference axes and the AP axis ( F=68.937, P<0.001; χ 2=248.144, P<0.001). The difference between Akagi line and MBPT showed no significant difference ( P=0.067), and the differences between Akagi line and MSPT, MTPT1, MTPT2 were significant ( P<0.012 5).

Conclusion

When the position of the posterior cruciate ligament insertion can not be accurately identified on total knee arthroplasty, MBPT can be used as the modified Akagi line in reference to the geometrical center point of the tibial osteotomy surface to construct a reliable rotational alignment of the tibial component.

Soft-tissue landmarks for tibial baseplate rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty: A cadaveric study

The tip of the tibial tubercle (TTT) is used to assess tibial baseplate rotation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA); however, it can be difficult to palpate and visualize intraoperatively. Several more easily accessible soft-tissue structures have been proposed as intraoperative assessments, including the patellar tendon's medial border (MBPT) and the junction of the medial third of the patellar tendon (mt-PT). No studies have described the relationship between the TTT and these proposed landmarks. The aims of the study were to (1) determine the relationship of the soft-tissue landmarks to the TTT and (2) identify any sex differences in these measures. Measurements of the position of these soft-tissue landmarks relative to the TTT were made on 56 cadaveric knees (28 female) by two observers at the level of the standard tibial cut (10 mm distal to the lateral tibial plateau). The results obtained were compared by sex and side. On average, 50.7% (SD 6.79, range 33.1%-63.1%) of the patellar tendon footprint was medial to the TTT. There were no significant differences between the sexes or left and right lower limbs. However, there was large variability in the position of all the soft-tissue landmarks relative to the TTT. The results indicate that, on average, the patellar tendon footprint is evenly spread around the TTT. However, there is a large variability in the anatomical relationship between the soft-tissue landmarks and the TTT. Caution is advised if relying on these structures intraoperatively.

CT measures of femoral and tibial version and rotational position of femoral and tibial components of knee replacements: limitations in reliability and suitability for routine clinical practice

OBJECTIVES

Rotational malalignment of knee replacements as measured on CT is understood to be associated with poor outcomes. The aim of this study is to measure the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of measures of femoral and tibial version in the native arthritic knee and postoperative TKR component position using CT.

METHODS

Eighty patients underwent CT of the knee before and after total knee replacement. Preoperative femoral and tibial version and component rotation were independently measured by two musculoskeletal radiologists.

RESULTS

Mean differences between and within raters were small (< 1.6°). Maximum 95% limits of agreement for inter-rater and intra-rater comparisons were 8.1° and 7.6° for preoperative femoral version, 9.0° and 7.9° for postoperative femoral rotation, 26.0° and 20.5° for preoperative tibial version, and 24.9° and 23.6° for postoperative tibial rotation respectively. Postoperative ICCs varied from 0.68 to 0.81 (lower 95% CI:0.55-0.72) for both intra- and inter-rater comparisons. Preoperative ICCs were lower: 0.55-0.75 (lower 95% CI:0.40-0.65).

CONCLUSION

The lower 95% confidence level for ICC of version and rotational measurements using the Berger protocol of TKRs on CT are all less than 0.73 and that the normal range of differences between observers is up to 9° for the femoral component and 26° for the tibial component. This suggests that CT measurements derived from the Berger protocol may not be consistent enough for clinical practice.

KEY POINTS

• CT is commonly used to measure the rotational profile of knee replacements in symptomatic patients using the Berger protocol. • The limits of agreement for both femoral and tibial component rotation are wide even for experienced observers. • CT measurements of the rotation of knee arthroplasty are not reliable enough for routine clinical use.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Synovial Classification Is Associated With Revision Indication and Polyethylene Insert Damage

BACKGROUND

Patients with total knee arthroplasty (TKA) stiffness are commonly presumed to have arthrofibrosis though no specific test exists. In patients undergoing revision TKA, we asked the following question: (1) Do patients who are revised for stiffness display a synovial reaction on MRI that is different than patients revised for other reasons? (2) Do these patients have a different magnitude of polyethylene insert damage than patients revised for other reasons? and (3) Is the MRI synovial classification associated with polyethylene insert damage?

METHODS

Patients undergoing revision TKA for stiffness had a preoperative MRI performed, and the synovium was classified on MRI in a blinded fashion as arthrofibrosis, focal scarring, polymeric reaction, infection, or abnormal. At surgery, the polyethylene inserts were removed, and graded by 2 reviewers for total surface damage.

RESULTS

Revision indication and MRI synovial classification were associated (P < .0001), with a greater proportion of patients assigned an MRI classification of arthrofibrosis revised for arthrofibrosis and a greater proportion of patients assigned a polymeric classification revised for aseptic loosening. Patients assigned an MRI synovial classification of polymeric had the greatest damage to the tibial insert (P < .0001), and patients revised for the clinical indication of aseptic loosening had the greatest damage to the tibial insert (P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

Synovial grading on MRI is strongly associated with revision indication and polyethylene insert damage. In patients with stiffness in the absence of another complication, MRI can be a helpful diagnostic adjuvant in confirming the diagnosis of stiffness.

A New Reference Axis for Tibial Component Rotation in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Three-dimensional Computed Tomography Analysis

The purpose of this study was to introduce a new reference axis for tibial rotation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and verify its reliability. A consecutive series of 80 knees that underwent TKA from 2018 to 2020 as well as 80 healthy knees were analyzed using a three-dimensional tibial model. A coordinate system was established based on the standard TKA tibial cut. The line connecting the lateral-tibial eminence and the medial 1/3rd of the tibial tubercle or the medial border of the tibial tubercle was identified as the lateral eminence line (LE line) and the medial lateral eminence line (MLE line), respectively. To evaluate the reliability of the new reference axis, Akagi's line, the medial third of the tibial tubercle (1/3 line) was compared with the LE and MLE lines by measuring the angle between the lines and the Z-axis. In the coronal view, the intersection angle (TPA), which is composed of the line connecting the center of the medial and lateral tibial plateau with the Z-axis, was measured. The mean angle between Akagi's line and the Z-axis in the healthy group and the osteoarthritis (OA) group was 87.57 ± 3.48° and 87.61 ± 3.47°, respectively. The mean angle between the LE line and Z-axis in the healthy and OA groups was 87.15 ± 4.13° and 86.78 ± 3.95°, respectively. A weak correlation was found between the TPA and Akagi's line and the 1/3 line. A moderate correlation was observed between the TPA and LE lines. There were no significant differences between the healthy and OA groups (P > 0.05) in any of the four reference axes. The LE line showed excellent intra- and inter-observer reliability and reproducibility. The novel and easily drawn LE line is a preferable option for tibial component rotational alignment in TKA.

Postoperative pain as a risk factor for stiff knee following total knee arthroplasty and excellent patientreported outcomes after manipulation under anesthesia

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) is the first-choice treatment for stiffness following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) unresponsive to pain management and physiotherapy. Some of the predisposing factors and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following MUA remain poorly studied. We retrospectively investigated the etiological risk factors and the outcomes of MUA.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

391 TKA patients from a randomized trial comparing the use of a tourniquet and anesthesia (spinal or general) were analyzed, and patients needing MUA were identified (MUA group). We evaluated in-hospital opioid consumption, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), range of motion (ROM), and pain assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory-short form with a 1-year follow-up.

RESULTS

39 (10%) MUA patients were identified. The MUA patients were younger (60 years vs. 64 years, difference -4, 95% CI -6 to -1) and had higher postoperative oxycodone consumption (66 mg vs. 51 mg, median difference 11, CI 1-22) than the no-MUA patients. The proportion of MUA patients who contacted the emergency department within 3 months because of pain was larger than that of non-MUA patients (41% vs. 12%, OR 5, CI 3-10). At the 1-year follow-up, the ROM was improved by 39° following MUA, but the total ROM was worse in the MUA group (115° vs. 124°, p < 0.001). No difference was found in the OKS between the MUA and no-MUA patients.

INTERPRETATION

Higher postoperative pain seems to predict MUA risk. MUA performed 3 months postoperatively offers substantial ROM improvement and comparable PROMs to no-MUA patients 1 year after TKA.

Accuracy and Validity of Sharma's Venn Diagram Method for Assessment of Tibial Component Rotation in Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Malrotation of the tibial component in a total knee replacement leads to anterior knee pain, patella dislocations, extensor mechanism disruptions, knee stiffness and prosthesis loosening. Techniques like free-floating technique, medial 1/3 rd of the tibial tubercle, medial border of the tibial tuberosity, Akagi's line, transcondylar line of tibia, posterior condylar line of tibia, midsulcus of tibial spines, curve on curve technique have been advocated. None of these have been shown to be accurate and reproducible. We developed a novel 'Sharma's Venn Diagram' method to assess the tibial component rotation.

METHODS

Fifty-two consecutive knee replacements were included in a prospective observational study. The average age of the study group was 53.6 years (48-76 years) Thirty-one were females and 3 were males. The patients were followed a minimum of one years (max 2 years, average 1.8 years). 'Sharma's Venn diagram Method (C)' was compared to free-floating method (F) and post-op CT scans using Berger protocol (B).

RESULTS

Tibial rotation calculated using Sharma's Venn diagram method (C) coincided with the final component placement in 50/52 knees. The free floating method (F) coincided with method (C) in 30/52 knees with an average 4.8° external rotation in 5 knees and an average of 5.2° internal rotation in 17 knees. Bland Altman method was used to compare method (C) with Method (F), The difference was statistically significant p < 0.0001.

CONCLUSION

Sharma's Venn diagram method is reliable, accurate and easily reproducible by any surgeon performing tkr and correlates with postoperative 2D CT-based assessment of tibial component rotation.

LEVEL II STUDY

Prospective observational study.

Is standard total knee arthroplasty with lateral femoral overhanging a cause of anterior knee pain? A randomized controlled trial

Introduction: Anterior knee pain (AKP) may persist after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), even if well aligned and stable, and is reported in up to 30% of patients, leading to patient dissatisfaction. The gender-specific knee prostheses have been designed to reduce femoral component overhanging in females and improve patient satisfaction. The purpose of this study was to determine AKP between gender-specific knee prosthesis and unisex knee prosthesis following minimally invasive surgery (MIS) TKA with patellar resurfacing. Methods: This study was a randomized trial comparing a gender-specific vs. unisex knee prosthesis in females with knee osteoarthritis. Follow-up occurred at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. Pre- and postoperative AKP were measured at each follow-up. Intraoperative lateral overhanging of the femoral component and patellar tracking were also measured and compared between the two groups. Results: Sixty females were recruited; 30 underwent gender-specific knee prosthesis (Gp1) and 30 underwent unisex knee prosthesis (Gp2). No patients were lost to follow-up. The incidence rates of AKP and visual analog scale AKP pain scores at 2 years were 7 vs. 7% (p = 1.00) and 0.95 ± 0.31 (0–1) points vs. 1.10 ± 0.28 (0–1) points (p = 0.68) for gender and unisex prostheses, respectively. Patellar tilt and patellar shift were similar between the two groups. Patellar tilt and patellar shift were 2.56° ± 2.03 (0–8) vs. 2.67° ± 2.35 (0–9) (p = 0.46) and 1.25 ± 1.09 (0–3.2) mm vs. 1.15 ± 0.97 (0–2.9) mm (p = 0.34) for Gp1 and Gp2, respectively. Mean lateral femoral overhanging was 0.23 ± 0.63 mm (range: 1–2 mm, Gp1) vs. 1.57 ± 1.36 mm (range: 1–3 mm, Gp2) (p ≤ 0.001). Conclusion: Both types of prostheses had similar incidence rates of AKP, VAS scores for AKP. Lateral femoral overhanging of ≤ 3 mm was not the cause of AKP.

Patellar tilt does not affect patient reported outcomes after modern total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The focus of patella maltracking after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has traditionally been on patella polyethylene damage and failure mechanisms rather than functional outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of patellar tilt on patient reported outcomes (PROMS) after primary TKA performed with patellar resurfacing.

METHODS

A retrospective review using a single implant design was performed. Patella tilt was radiographically measured according to a standardized protocol. PROMS related to pain, function, and satisfaction were evaluated preoperatively and at minimum 1-year follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 468 TKAs were included for analysis. Mean age and BMI were 64 years and 35 kg/m²; respectively while 63% of patients were female. The median follow-up period was 12.7 months. Overall, patellar tilt was corrected from a median of 5.0 degrees preoperatively to a median of 3.0 degrees postoperatively. Preoperative, postoperative, and the change in patellar tilt had no significant effects on PROMS at minimum 1-year follow-up (p ≥ 0.092). Satisfaction in knee function while getting out of bed was higher for patients with approximately the same patellar tilt before and after TKA compared to patients with an increase in lateral patellar tilt (95% vs 80%, p = 0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

The range of patellar tilt studied in this cohort had little to no effect on PROMS. However, suboptimal patellar tracking may potentiate edge loading of the polyethylene and contribute to implant damage in the long-term. These results are helpful to focus efforts on the tibiofemoral articulation as the predominant determinant of patient outcomes.

Importance of Three-Dimensional Evaluation of Surgical Transepicondylar Axis in Total Knee Arthroplasty

In total knee arthroplasty, the surgical transepicondylar axis (SEA) is one of the most reliable rotation axes for stabilizing of the patellofemoral joint. The SEA is identified with reference to the lateral epicondyle and the medial sulcus of the medial epicondyle. However, these two structures rarely appear on the same plane on computed tomography (CT), and it is necessary to take two points in separate images. Many surgeons measure the SEA on the same image (pseudo SEA) instead. We aimed to determine the difference between true SEAs and pseudo SEAs. A total of 31 normal knees and 24 varus knees were included in this study. Three-dimensional (3D) models of the femur were reconstructed from CT images, and a reconstructed plane was made using the International Society of Biomechanics coordinate system. Pseudo SEAs drawn in the plane passing through the lateral epicondyle and medial sulcus were defined as l-SEA and m-SEA, respectively. L-SEA, m-SEA, true SEA, and posterior condylar axis (PCA) were projected onto the International Society of Biomechanics coordinate plane and, "p l-SEA," "p m-SEA," "p true SEA," and "p PCA" were obtained. The true SEA angle was defined as the angle between p true SEA and p PCA. The l-SEA angle or m-SEA angle was defined as the angle between the p l-SEA or p m-SEA and p PCA, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between true SEA angle (2.64 ± 2.01 degrees) and pseudo SEA angle (l-SEA angle: 2.74 ± 2.07 degrees, m-SEA: 2.54 ± 2.19 degrees). Conversely, 12 knees in the normal group and 2 knees in the varus group had differences of more than 1 degree (p = 0.01). Among them, 6 knees in the normal group and 0 knees in the varus group had a difference of 2 degrees or more (p = 0.03). In most cases, pseudo SEA can be substituted for true SEA.

The personalized Berger method is usable to solve the problem of tibial rotation

Purpose

The revision of any total knee replacement is carried out in a significant number of cases, due to the excessive internal rotation of the tibial component. The goal was to develop a personalized method, using only the geometric parameters of the tibia, without the femoral guidelines, to calculate the postoperative rotational position of tibial component malrotation within a tolerable error threshold in every case.

Methods

Preoperative CT scans of eighty-five osteoarthritic knees were examined by three independent medical doctors twice over 7 weeks.

The geometric centre of the tibia was produced by the ellipse annotation drawn 8 mm below the tibial plateau, the sagittal and frontal axes of the ellipse were transposed to the slice of the tibial tuberosity. With the usage of several guide lines, a right triangle was drawn within which the personalized Berger angle was calculated.

Results

A very good intra-observer (0.89-0.925) and inter-observer (0.874) intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was achieved. Even if the average of the personalized Berger values were similar to the original 18° (18.32° in our case), only 70.6% of the patients are between the clinically tolerable thresholds (12.2° and 23.8°).

Conclusion

The method, measured on the preoperative CT scans, is capable of calculating the required correction during the planning of revision arthroplasties which are necessary due to the tibial component malrotation. The personalized Berger angle isn’t altered during arthroplasty, this way it determines which one of the anterior reference points of the tibia (medial 1/3 or the tip of the tibial tuberosity, medial border or 1/6 or 1/3 or the centre of the patellar tendon) can be used during the positioning of the tibial component.

Level of evidence

Level II, Diagnostic Study (Methodological Study).

Custom total knee: understanding the indication and process

Patient-specific total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a copy of the bony knee morphology based on a pre-op computer tomography (CT). The images are segmented in 3D and software is utilized through a proprietary process to generate individual total knee implants to recreate the articulating surfaces. The distal condylar valgus angle of the prosthesis is matched anatomically to the distal femur and reversely matched on the tibia with a thicker lateral insert. The implant, a set of patient-specific jigs (PSJ), which are 3D printed in nylon, and a detailed surgical plan are sent to the hospital in one box. The system is available with one solid or two separated medial and lateral PE inserts. There is a cruciate retaining (CR) and posterior stabilized (PS) version available, including various insert thicknesses. The system allows the addition of two different cemented stem extensions if needed at the time of surgery.

Results of revision knee replacement for patients with isolated fixed flexion deformity after primary or revision knee replacement

BACKGROUND

Postoperative fixed flexion deformity is a known complication of knee replacement surgery. We present our results of revision surgery for treatment of isolated fixed flexion deformity after knee replacement.

METHODS

32 patients had revision knee replacement for fixed flexion deformity and were included in this retrospective study. Minimum follow up period was 28 months.

RESULTS

Two different surgical interventions had been done in these patients. Group 1 (15 patients) had revision of the femoral component, posterior capsular release and tibial component was not revised. Group 2 (18 Patients) had revision of both femoral and tibial components. One patient was included in both groups as she had both interventions. The extent of preoperative flexion deformity in group 1 was from 15 to 40 deg (mean 20.6 deg). Postoperative range of extension was 0 to 20 deg (mean 8.2 deg). In group 2, preoperative flexion deformity was 10 to 25 deg (mean 16.9 deg) and postoperative flexion deformity was 0 to 20 deg (mean 4.2 deg). The difference in improvement between the two groups was not statistically significant on Mann Whitney U test (two tailed p value 0.181) for non normal distribution. Improvement in Oxford knee score following surgery was only 1 point in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Revision for isolated fixed flexion deformity leads to improvement in range of extension, but improvement in clinical score is marginal. The choice of preservation or revision of the tibial component did not make a significant difference to the outcome.

The Efficacy and Safety of a Novel Extramedullary Guide Coordinated with 3D Surgical Assistive Software for Total Knee Arthroplasty: an Open-Label Single-Arm Trial

To improve component-placement accuracy in total knee arthroplasty, we developed two devices: an original extramedullary patient-specific guide for the femur and an original extramedullary universal guide for the tibia (EM-TIBIA). We also developed a new function in ZedView, a three-dimensional surgical assistive software, that provides the parameters necessary to install the EM-TIBIA. Compared with conventional manual methods based on X-ray two-dimensional images or ZedView, these newly developed devices function as an extramedullary intraoperative support guide in conjunction with ZedView, simplifying surgical procedures. We conducted a study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the surgery using the new guides and software function. Nineteen patients underwent surgery. On the femoral side, the mean absolute difference of the installation alignment was within 3° for all parameters. On the other hand, on the tibial side, the mean absolute difference from the preoperative plan for the rotation was 5.26±5.30°. The proportion of patients whose difference fell within ±3° was 52.6% (95% confi dence interval: 28.9 to 75.6%), and did not meet the pre-specified criteria for efficacy (P=0.261). No serious adverse events were reported, and no excessive bleeding, thrombosis, infections, or intraoperative or postoperative fractures were noted. The two new guides can easily reproduce the preoperative plan as 3D intraoperative support jigs, but errors can occur on the tibia side due to soft tissue that is not recognized by CT, creating problems in installation accuracy.

Influence of posterior tibial slope on three-dimensional femorotibial alignment under weight-bearing conditions in healthy Japanese elderly people

BACKGROUND

Assessment of three-dimensional (3D) femorotibial alignment is essential for successful knee osteoarthritis treatment in the elderly. The complex morphology of the posterior tibial slope (PTS) might have an influence on sagittal and rotational alignment and the positional relationship between the femur and tibia in the anterior-posterior (AP) direction under weight-bearing conditions.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to clarify the association between the PTS and 3D femorotibial alignment under weight-bearing conditions in healthy Japanese elderly individuals.

METHODS

We investigated the 3D femorotibial alignment of 110 lower extremities of 55 healthy individuals (26 women, 29 men, mean age: 70 ± 6 years). Using our previously reported 3D-to-2D image registration technique, we evaluated the 3D hip-knee-ankle angle (3DHKA) in the sagittal plane, rotational alignment, and the distance between the femoral and tibial origins in the AP direction (tibial AP position) as femorotibial alignment parameters under weight-bearing conditions. We assessed the medial and lateral PTS and their angular difference (PTS difference) as PTS parameters. Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis was performed using PTS parameters and other possible confounders (age, sex, height, and weight) as the independent variables and femorotibial alignment parameters as the dependent variable.

RESULTS

Weight (𝛽 = 0.393, p < 0.001) and lateral PTS (𝛽 = 0.298, p < 0.001) were the predictors associated with 3DHKA in the sagittal plane. Lateral PTS (𝛽 = 0.304, p = 0.001) was the only predictor associated with the tibial AP position. Sex (𝛽 = -0.282, p = 0.002) and PTS difference (𝛽 = -0.231, p = 0.012) were associated with rotational alignment.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that a steeper lateral PTS resulted in a more flexed knee and anterior tibia. The PTS difference was positively correlated with tibial external rotation. Our data could be used as the standard reference for realignment surgery to ensure PTS is appropriately maintained.

Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty improves the outlier of rotational alignment of the tibial prosthesis using 3DCT measurements

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to compare the accuracy of prosthetic alignment with three-dimensional computed tomography (3DCT) measurements following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) performed using a robotic-assisted surgical technique versus a conventional TKA.

METHODS

41 TKAs were performed with a handheld robotic-assisted surgical procedure (Robot group) between 2019 and 2020. Another 41 patients underwent TKA with a conventional manual surgical procedure (Manual group) using the same prosthesis. The operation durations between both groups were investigated. 3DCT scans of the entire lower extremities were taken before and after the surgery and femoral and tibial alignments in the coronal, sagittal, and axial planes were measured using computer software. The differences in prosthetic alignment and translation between the preoperative 3DCT plan and postoperative 3DCT image were also measured.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences in the post-operative outliers of the femorotibial angle between the groups. In the tibial-axial plane, the mean of prosthetic alignment in the anteroposterior plane was 4.0° in the Robot group and 6.7° in the Manual group (p < 0.01). The rate of outliers for tibial-axial alignment in the Robot group was significantly less than in the Manual group (p < 0.01). There were no statistically significant differences in prosthetic translation in the proximal-distal, anterior-posterior and medial-lateral orientations between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In a radiologic study using 3DCT, robotic-assisted TKA reduced the outliers for rotational alignment of the tibial prosthesis in comparison to conventional TKA, which can lead to improved tracking of the femoral-tibial bearing surfaces.

Causes of stiffness after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Knee stiffness after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) often leads to pain and discomfort, failing to meet patients' expectations on the surgical procedure. Despite the growing debate on the topic, a comprehensive literature analysis of stiffness causes has never been conducted. Thus, the purpose of the present study was to systematically review the literature regarding the main causes of stiffness after TKA.

METHODS

Pubmed Central, Scopus, and EMBASE databases were systematically reviewed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines for studies on stiffness and pain or discomfort after TKA through November 2020. Overall, 25 articles matched the selection criteria and were included in the study. Clinical relevance and strength of evidence of the included studies were graded using the risk of bias and the methodological index for non-randomized studies quality assessment tools.

RESULTS

The main causes of pain and discomfort due to stiffness were surgery-related issues, i.e., component malpositioning and over-voluming, implant loosening, psychological distress, and obesity, which could be considered "modifiable" factors, and expression of profibrotic markers, high material hypersensitivity-related cytokines level, male gender, previous contralateral TKA, and high pre-operative pain, which could be considered "non-modifiable" factors.

CONCLUSION

The use of alternative technologies such as surgical robots, anatomy-based devices, and more inert and less stiff component materials could help in reducing stiffness caused by both modifiable and even some non-modifiable factors. Furthermore, early diagnostic detection of stiffness onset could consistently support surgeons in patient-specific decision-making.

Single-Sided Reciprocating Saw for Tibial Component Removal During Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

Revision total knee arthroplasty often necessitates removing well-fixed components. Tibial tray removal is challenging becaue of 1) physical barriers posed by the component pegs, keel, or stem in accessing the implant-bone interface circumferentially and 2) proximity of vulnerable structures including the patellar tendon, collateral ligaments, popliteal artery, and distal femur. In this report, we present a step-by-step technique for removal of a well-fixed tibial component using a single-sided reciprocating saw.

Early Patellofemoral Function of Medial Pivot Prostheses Compared with Posterior-Stabilized Prostheses for Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty

Objective

To systematically evaluate the patellofemoral joint design of medial pivot prosthesis, which incorporates a variety of “patella‐friendly” design features, by comparing clinical and radiographic results with another prosthesis.

Methods

All consecutive patients who underwent unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with medial pivot prosthesis (Group MP, 126 cases) between September 2016 and April 2018 were enrolled in this retrospective study. For each patient reviewed, a control patient was matched, according to age, gender, side, body mass index (BMI), preoperative range of motion (ROM), and operating period, who had received primary unilateral TKA with a conventional posterior‐stabilized prosthesis at the same period as the study group (Group PS, 126 cases). All patients underwent at least 1‐year follow‐up. At the preoperative and final follow‐up periods, data on the Knee Society Score (KSS) score, WOMAC score, Kujala score, and ROM were collected. Merchant views were taken with the knee flexion at 30°, 60°, and 90° to measure patella shift and tilt. Preoperative posterior condylar angle (PCA) was also measured. Postoperative complications, including anterior knee pain, maltracking, patellar clunk or crepitus (PCC), were evaluated.

Results

There were no significant differences in the demographics or clinical characteristics between the two groups. No statistically significant difference was identified in the KSS total score, including knee score and function score, or in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score between the two groups after the operation. We found statistically significant differences in the postoperative Kujala scores and the ROMs between the two groups. The mean Kujala score in group MP was better than in group PS (MP 77.16 ± 3.80 vs PS 75.97 ± 4.06, P < 0.05), while the ROM in group PS was significantly higher than in group MP (MP 122.24° ± 4.45° vs PS 123.78° ± 6.05°, P < 0.05). Simultaneously, the preoperative/postoperative Kujala score improvement in group MP was observed to be significantly larger than in group PS (MP 27.82 ± 5.31 vs PS 26.17 ± 4.89, P < 0.05), but the average ROM improvement in group PS was significantly greater than in group MP (MP 19.00° ±9.90° vs PS 21.57° ± 9.62°). In the 90° Merchant view, the mean patella tilt of group MP was statistically smaller than that of group PS (MP 4.21° ± 1.62° vs PS 4.74° ± 1.95°, P < 0.05), and the average patella tilt change in group MP was significantly greater than in group PS (MP –3.8° ± 1.43° vs PS –3.23° ± 1.33°, P < 0.05). Preoperative PCA did not show significant differences between the two groups. Two cases of PCC and three cases of anterior knee pain were noted in group MP, and nine cases and six cases, respectively, were observed in group PS. The incidence of PCC was significantly lower in group MP (1.6% vs 7.1%, P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in follow‐up time between the two groups.

Conclusion

The medial pivot prosthesis could achieve satisfactory outcomes with better patellofemoral performance attributed to its “patella‐friendly” design characteristics compared to the conventional posterior‐stabilized prosthesis.

Malrotation of the fixed-bearing posterior stabilized total knee prosthesis causes a postoperative rotational mismatch between the femur and tibia

PURPOSE

This study aimed to identify factors associated with rotational mismatch after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using fixed-bearing posterior stabilized prosthesis and to evaluate the impact of the rotational mismatch on clinical outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 159 cases that underwent TKA. Whole-leg computed tomography images were obtained 2 weeks after TKA, with three-dimensional measures of alignment. Rotational alignment of the femoral and tibial components and rotational mismatch between components and between the femur and tibia bones were evaluated. The new Knee Society Score (KSS) was obtained at the final outpatient visit, which was defined as the final follow-up timepoint. Predictive factors were identified for rotational mismatch of the lower extremity and poor new KSS.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 42 ± 16 months. Rotational mismatch ≥ 10° between bones was identified in 56 cases (35%), with a mean mismatch angle of 5.0° ± 9.1° of external rotation of the tibia relative to the femur. Rotational mismatch ≥ 10° between components was identified in three cases (2%; mean 0.3° ± 3.6° of internal tibial rotation). A multivariate regression analysis showed that component malrotation was predictive of post-operative rotational mismatch between bones (p < 0.01) and rotational mismatch ≥ 10° associated with poor new KSS (odds ratio 4.22; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Malrotation of the fixed-bearing posterior stabilized TKA causes a rotational mismatch between the femur and tibia bones. Excessive rotational mismatch between bones greater than 10° is a risk factor for poor postoperative functional outcome. Precise component positioning is essential for improving TKA outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.