What is the best way to apply the Spurling test for cervical radiculopathy?

Exploring Symptom Responses to Upper Limb Neural Test Variations of the Radial Nerve in Patients With Lateral Epicondylalgia: An Observational Study

OBJECTIVE

Clinical practice guidelines recommend the radial nerve mechanosensitivity evaluation in patients with lateral epicondylalgia. Despite different positions and sequences having been described, no research analyzed how each variation triggers symptoms associated with lateral epicondylalgia. The aim of this study was to explore the effects of different positions and sequences in the upper limb neural tension test 2b (ULNT2b) in symptom responses in patients with lateral epicondylalgia.

METHODS

In this observational study, 66 patients underwent 4 test conditions: standard ULNT2b, ULNT2b proximal to distal, ULNT2B with resisted supination, and resisted supination isolated. Paresthesia sensations, symptom reproduction, pain intensity (measured using a visual analog scale), and distribution of painful symptoms data were collected.

RESULTS

Significant differences in paresthesia sensations were observed between groups, with significant differences between the standard ULNT2B and other ULNT variations or resisted supination maneuvers. Symptom reproduction also differed significantly across groups, with significant differences between the standard ULNT2B and other ULNT or resisted supination tests. The positive/negative test and percentage of distribution of painful symptoms scores varied significantly across 4 conditions in both lateral and frontal views. Although pain intensity scores during tests were comparable among the tests, distribution of painful symptoms differed significantly.

CONCLUSION

Variations in the ULNT2b test can affect symptom responses in patients with lateral epicondylalgia. The standard ULNT2b test appears more effective at reproducing symptoms, intensity of paresthesia, and distribution of painful symptoms compared to other ULNT variations and the resisted supination test.

IMPACT

ULNT2b sequences have been shown to elicit varying responses concerning paresthesia, replication of familiar symptoms, positive/negative test results, and distribution of painful symptoms. Clinicians should consider specific test variations during the patients' radial nerve mechanosensitivity assessment to identify aggravating factors reproducing recognizable symptoms. A control group of asymptomatic participants and the role of presence of other comorbidities, psychological factors, or the duration of symptoms were not considered in this study and might play an important role influencing the results of the tests.

Feasibility and Acceptability of a Telemedicine Triage Model Among Medicaid Patients with Low Back Pain Referred to a Spine Center

Background

The data for primary triage via telemedicine for spine related conditions are sparse but has potential to improve access, quality of care, and offer significant cost savings for Medicaid insured patients who have very limited access to care. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of implementing a telehealth triage framework using synchronous video conferencing appointments.

Methods

This is a prospective cohort feasibility study conducted within an academic spine center in the United States. Participants include Medicaid insured patients referred to an academic spine center for low back pain. We collected demographic information, a spine red flag survey, a patient satisfaction survey and demand and implementation feasibility metrics. Participants completed a demographic and red-flag survey followed by a telehealth spine appointment with a physiatrist. Immediately after the appointment, the participant completed a satisfaction survey.

Results

Nineteen patients met inclusion criteria but declined telehealth either due to preference for in-person appointment or lack of comfort with technology. Thirty-three participants enrolled and attended their initial telehealth appointment. Few participants reporting 1 or more red flag symptom also screened positive during their subsequent telehealth evaluation with the physician (n=7/28). Participant satisfaction was high across all domains including ease of scheduling, efficiency of virtual check in, ability to report their symptoms fully and accurately to the provider, imaging review, explanation of diagnosis and treatment plan. Most participants (n=19/20, 95%) would recommend an initial telehealth appointment.

Conclusions

The telehealth framework used was feasible and provided an acceptable form of care for Medicaid patients who were interested and able to participate in this form of care. Our acceptability results are promising but should be interpreted with caution given the proportion of patients who declined to participate.

The Spine Physical Examination Using Telemedicine: Strategies and Best Practices

STUDY DESIGN

Technical note.

OBJECTIVES

To provide spine surgeons new to telemedicine with a structured physical examination technique based on manual motor testing principles.

METHODS

Expert experience describing a series of specific maneuvers for upper and lower extremity strength testing that can be performed using a telemedicine platform. In addition, we offer instruction on "setting up" for these visits and highlight special tests that can be used to diagnose specific cervical and lumbar spine conditions.

RESULTS

From our experiences in conducting telemedicine visits, we provide a means of testing and scoring upper and lower extremity strength for interpretation of weakness in the context of traditional manual motor testing. Also, we acknowledge the limitations of a remote examination and discuss maneuvers that cannot be performed remotely.

CONCLUSIONS

COVID-19 has drastically altered the delivery of care for patients with spine-related complaints. The need for social distancing has led to the widespread adoption of telemedicine. This technical note provides an urgently needed framework for the standardization of the remote physical exam. Validation of the exam as a diagnostic tool will be a crucial next step in studying the impact of telemedicine.

Diagnostic accuracy of upper limb neurodynamic tests in the diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy

BACKGROUND

Upper limb neurodynamic tests (ULNT) are used to diagnose neuropathic conditions such as cervical radiculopathy (CR). Within the literature, a positive ULNT is defined in markedly variable ways, which is likely why the diagnostic accuracy of these tests lacks consistency across studies.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the diagnostic accuracy of single and combined upper limb neurodynamic tests ((ULNT)1,2a, 2b and 3) for cervical radiculopathy using test findings that are similar to those used in practice.

DESIGN

Diagnostic accuracy study (prospective) design following the updated STARD 2015 reporting guideline.

METHOD

From 109 consecutively enrolled individuals with suspected CR. Of the 85 participants included, 27 (31.7%) were diagnosed with CR (mean age, 43.9years; Neck Disability Index 38,16%). ULNTs test were performed by a blind examiner to a CR reference standard of clinical diagnosis and magnetic resonance imaging verification provided by a neurosurgeon.

RESULTS

In general, the single tests were better at ruling in CR versus ruling out. Of the single ULNT, the ULNT3 demonstrated the strongest post-test probability change with a positive finding (73.28%). Three of four test combinations demonstrated the highest clinical utility for changing the post-test probability with a positive finding at 83.29% and with LR+ = 12.89 (95%CI: 3.10-53.62). Having none of the test's positive was able to rule out CR with LR- = 0.08 (95%CI: 0.01-0.56).

CONCLUSION

ULNTs fail to significantly alter post-test probability when used singularly for diagnosis of CR. However, combinations of ULNT (3 out of 4 positive) can rule in CR, and rule out CR when all ULNT are negative.

The Virtual Spine Examination: Telemedicine in the Era of COVID-19 and Beyond

STUDY DESIGN

Narrative review.

OBJECTIVES

Describe a comprehensive spine telemedicine examination.

METHODS

We discuss telemedicine examination techniques for commonly encountered spine conditions.

RESULTS

Techniques to evaluate gait, the cervical spine, the lumbar spine, adult spinal deformity patients, and adolescent scoliosis patients via telemedicine are described. We review limitations of the spine telemedicine examination and discuss special considerations such as patient safety and criteria for in-person assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

While there are limitations to the spine telemedicine examination, unique strategies exist to provide important information to the examiner. Efforts have already been undertaken to validate and expand the capabilities of the spine telemedicine examination.

Diagnostic accuracy of patient interview items and clinical tests for cervical radiculopathy

OBJECTIVE

To determine the diagnostic accuracy of patient interview items and clinical tests to diagnose cervical radiculopathy.

DESIGN

A prospective diagnostic accuracy study.

PARTICIPANTS

Consecutive patients (N=134) with a suspicion of cervical radiculopathy were included. A medical specialist made the diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy based on the patient's clinical presentation and corresponding Magnetic Resonance Imaging findings. Participants completed a list of patient interview items and the clinical tests were performed by a physiotherapist.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Diagnostic accuracy was determined in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and positive (+LR) and negative likelihood ratios (-LR). Sensitivity and specificity values ≥0.80 were considered high. We considered +LR≥5 and -LR≤0.20 moderate, and +LR≥10 and -LR≤0.10 high.

RESULTS

The history items 'arm pain worse than neck pain', 'provocation of symptoms when ironing', 'reduction of symptoms by walking with your hand in your pocket', the Spurling test and the presence of reduced reflexes showed high specificity and are therefore useful to increase the probability of cervical radiculopathy when positive. The presence of 'paraesthesia' and 'paraesthesia and/or numbness' showed high sensitivity, indicating that the absence of these patient interview items decreases the probability of cervical radiculopathy. Although most of these items had potentially relevant likelihood ratios, none showed moderate or high likelihood ratios.

CONCLUSIONS

Several patient interview items, the Spurling test and reduced reflexes are useful to assist in the diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy. Because there is no gold standard for cervical radiculopathy, caution is required to not over-interpret diagnostic accuracy values.

Spurling's test - inconsistencies in clinical practice

Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the methodology, interpretation, and perceived value of Spurling's test toward diagnosis/classification and treatment. Methods: An anonymous web-based survey was made available to physical therapist members of the Academy of Orthopaedic Physical Therapy of the American Physical Therapy Association. Based on video demonstrations of technique and symptom distribution, questions included preferred method, criteria for test interpretation, and perceived value of Spurling's test and other examination findings toward clinical decision-making. Professional profile data were also collected. Results: Among the 452 participants completing the survey, no method of testing was preferred by more than 37%, with ipsilateral lateral flexion, rotation, and extension with compression being most frequently preferred followed by ipsilateral lateral flexion with compression at 32%. Proximal provocation of symptoms only without distal symptoms was interpreted as a positive test by 67%. Participants rated Spurling's test of moderate to low value toward diagnosis/classification and treatment. Discussion: Inconsistency with methodology and interpretation of Spurling's test is suggested to be pervasive in physical therapist practice. While an optimal test methodology has yet to be identified, result interpretation does have a basis for clarification toward diagnosis/classification and reduction of unwanted variance in practice.

Clinical characteristics of patients with posterosuperior labral tear: a comparison with patients with other shoulder disorders

Background

Among the various causes of shoulder pain, the glenoid labral tear is likely to be overlooked due to its ambiguous symptoms, especially if clinicians do not have a prior suspicion, making it difficult to diagnose, unlike adhesive capsulitis or a rotator cuff tear. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical features of posterosuperior (PS) labral tear.

Methods

Of the patients who visited the clinic, the medical records of patients with shoulder pain who underwent shoulder magnetic resonance imaging or ultrasound after intra-articular injection (arthrosonography) were investigated retrospectively. Based on these criteria, a total of 120 patients with adhesive capsulitis, rotator cuff problem, or PS labral tear were included for analysis in this study.

Results

In the physical examination, all patients with a PS labral tear were positive on the O’Brien test (13/13, 100%) and the external rotation (ER) test with the upper arm in the abduction position (abduction and ER [ABER] test) (13/13, 100%), but they were negative on other tests, such as the Hawkins–Kennedy (1/13, 7.69%) and Neer (0/13, 0.00%) tests. Except one patient, all patients with a PS labral tear were negative on the ER test with the upper arm in the neutral position (ER test) (1/13, 7.69%). In the clinical history, all patients with a PS labral tear had a characteristic episode of shoulder pain occurring in the excessive ABER posture.

Conclusion

In patients with characteristic physical findings (no definite loss of motion of the shoulder joint, negative in an ER test, but positive in an ABER test and O’Brien test), and with a clinical history of PS labral tear (a history of pain occurring with the excessive ABER posture), clinicians need to have a suspicion of PS labral tear and to identify the PS labral tear using MRI or arthrosonography

Morphometric changes of the cervical intervertebral foramen: A comparative analysis of pre-manipulative positioning and physiological axial rotation

BACKGROUND

Cervical foraminal impingement has been described as a source of radicular pain. Clinical tests and head motions have been reported for affecting the intervertebral foramen (IVF) dimensions. Although manual approaches are proposed in the management of cervical radiculopathy, their influence on the foraminal dimensions remains unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the influence of pre-manipulative positioning versus cervical axial rotation on the foraminal dimensions of the lower cervical spine.

METHODS

Thirty asymptomatic volunteers underwent CT scan imaging in neutral position and axial rotation or pre-manipulative positioning. The manipulation task was performed at C4-C5 following a multiple components procedure. 3D kinematics and IVF (height, width and area) were computed for each cervical segment.

RESULTS

The results showed that foraminal changes are dependent on motion types and cervical levels. With reference to head rotation, IVF opening occurred on the ipsilateral side during pre-manipulative positioning while axial rotation involved the contralateral side. Regardless of the side considered, magnitudes of opening were similar between both attitudes while narrowing was lower at the target and adjacent levels during the pre-manipulative positioning. Some associations between segmental motion and IVF changes were observed for the target level and the overlying level.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study demonstrated that pre-manipulative positioning targeting C4-C5 modified IVF dimensions differently than the passive axial rotation. The findings suggest that techniques which incorporate combined movement positioning influence segmental motion and IVF dimensions differently at the target segment, compared to unconstrained rotation. Further investigations are needed to determine the clinical outcomes of such an approach.

Reliability and validity of clinical tests to assess the anatomical integrity of the cervical spine in adults with neck pain and its associated disorders: Part 1-A systematic review from the Cervical Assessment and Diagnosis Research Evaluation (CADRE) Collaboration

OBJECTIVE

To determine the reliability and validity of clinical tests to assess the anatomical integrity of the cervical spine in adults with neck pain and its associated disorders.

METHODS

We updated the systematic review of the 2000-2010 Bone and Joint Decade Task Force on Neck Pain and its Associated Disorders. We also searched the literature to identify studies on the reliability and validity of Doppler velocimetry for the evaluation of cervical arteries. Two independent reviewers screened and critically appraised studies. We conducted a best evidence synthesis of low risk of bias studies and ranked the phases of investigations using the classification proposed by Sackett and Haynes.

RESULTS

We screened 9022 articles and critically appraised 8 studies; all 8 studies had low risk of bias (three reliability and five validity Phase II-III studies). Preliminary evidence suggests that the extension-rotation test may be reliable and has adequate validity to rule out pain arising from facet joints. The evidence suggests variable reliability and preliminary validity for the evaluation of cervical radiculopathy including neurological examination (manual motor testing, dermatomal sensory testing, deep tendon reflexes, and pathological reflex testing), Spurling's and the upper limb neurodynamic tests. No evidence was found for doppler velocimetry.

CONCLUSIONS

Little evidence exists to support the use of clinical tests to evaluate the anatomical integrity of the cervical spine in adults with neck pain and its associated disorders. We found preliminary evidence to support the use of the extension-rotation test, neurological examination, Spurling's and the upper limb neurodynamic tests.

Rotator cuff impingement associated with Type III acromial morphology in a young athlete-a case for early imaging

Down-sloped or hooked acromion morphologies may cause bony encroachment on the soft tissues of the subacromial space, predisposing to shoulder impingement syndrome. Of the latter, a hooked or Type III acromion (T3A) has also been linked to rotator cuff (RC) pathology. However, as bony acromial impingement is typically thought to occur over the age of 40, its occurrence in younger shoulder athletes presenting with shoulder pain, impingement and RC pathology may be overlooked. This case serves to illustrate the occurrence of T3A in a younger shoulder athlete, and the importance of early imaging in achieving diagnostic accuracy. Appropriate surgical referrals are patients with subacromial impingement syndrome refractory to 3-6 months of appropriate conservative treatment. Surgery may be particularly beneficial in patients with a T3A.

Cervicobrachial pain - How Often is it Neurogenic?

INTRODUCTION

Neck pain associated with pain in the arm (cervicobrachial pain) is a common complaint in patients seeking physiotherapy management. The source of symptoms for this complaint is commonly presumed to be neural. However, this pain pattern could also result from various other innervated tissue structures of the upper quarter. Knowledge about frequency of neural structures being a predominant source of symptoms would help in implementing appropriate therapeutic strategies such as neural tissue mobilization along with other complimentary therapies for optimal outcomes.

AIM

To determine the frequency of cervicobrachial pain being neurogenic.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Participants (n=361) aged between 20-65 years, reporting cervicobrachial pain were screened for neurogenic nature of symptoms. These physical signs included: active and passive movement dysfunction, adverse responses to neural tissue provocation tests, tenderness on palpating nerve trunks and related cutaneous tissues and evidence of a related local area of pathology (Clinical/radiological). The consistency of all these signs was checked to identify a significant neural involvement.

RESULTS

Descriptive statistics were used to analyse data. Of 361 participants, 206 were males (44.6 ±10.8 years) and 155 were females (41.8 ± 11.2 years). The frequency of neurogenic cervicobrachial pain was determined to be 19.9% (n=72) and the non-neurogenic sources for symptoms were attributed to 80.1% (n=289) of screened participants.

CONCLUSION

Lower frequency of cervicobrachial pain being neurogenic indicates thorough screening for appropriate therapeutic interventions to be successful.

Cervical radiculopathy

Cervical radiculopathy is the result of irritation and/or compression of nerve root as it exits the cervical spine. Pain is a common presenting symptom and may be accompanied by motor or sensory deficits in areas innervated by the affected nerve root. Diagnosis is suggested by history and corresponding physical examination findings. Confirmation is achieved with MRI. A multimodal approach to treatment helps patients improve. Medications may be used to alleviate symptoms and manage pain. Physical therapy and manipulation may improve neck discomfort. Guided corticosteroid injections and selected nerve blocks may help control nerve root pain. Most patients improve with a conservative, nonoperative treatment course.