Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty is currently of no proven clinical benefit: a systematic review

Progress in Computer-Assisted Navigation for Total Knee Arthroplasty in Treating Knee Osteoarthritis with Extra-Articular Deformity

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a well-established treatment for end-stage knee osteoarthritis. However, in patients with concomitant extra-articular deformities, conventional TKA techniques may lead to unsatisfactory outcomes and higher complication rates. This review summarizes the application of navigated TKA for treating knee osteoarthritis with extra-articular deformities. The principles and potential benefits of computer navigation systems, including improved component alignment, soft tissue balancing, and restoration of mechanical axis, are discussed. Research studies demonstrate that navigated TKA can effectively correct deformities, relieve pain, and improve postoperative joint function and quality of life compared with conventional methods. The advantages of navigated TKA in terms of surgical precision, lower complication rates, and superior functional recovery are highlighted. Despite challenges like the learning curve and costs, navigated TKA is an increasingly indispensable tool for achieving satisfactory outcomes in TKA for knee osteoarthritis patients with extra-articular deformities.

Appropriate sagittal positioning of femoral components in total knee arthroplasty to prevent fracture and loosening

Aims

This study aimed to investigate the optimal sagittal positioning of the uncemented femoral component in total knee arthroplasty to minimize the risk of aseptic loosening and periprosthetic fracture.

Methods

Ten different sagittal placements of the femoral component, ranging from -5 mm (causing anterior notch) to +4 mm (causing anterior gap), were analyzed using finite element analysis. Both gait and squat loading conditions were simulated, and Von Mises stress and interface micromotion were evaluated to assess fracture and loosening risk.

Results

During gait, varied sagittal positioning did not lead to excessive Von Mises stress or micromotion. However, under squat conditions, posterior positioning (-4 and -5 mm) resulted in stress exceeding 150 MPa at the femoral notch, indicating potential fracture risk. Conversely, +1 mm and 0 mm sagittal positions demonstrated minimal interface micromotion.

Conclusion

Slightly anterior sagittal positioning (+1 mm) or neutral positioning (0 mm) effectively reduced stress concentration at the femoral notch and minimized interface micromotion. Thus, these positions are deemed suitable to decrease the risk of aseptic loosening and periprosthetic femoral fracture.

Technology assistance in primary total knee replacement: hype or hope?

INTRODUCTION

Total knee replacement (TKR) reduces pain, it increases quality of life and it generally lasts a long time with revision rates of less than 5% at 10 years. Some authors have suggested that outcomes may be further improved by technology assistance.

AREAS COVERED

Technology assistance in primary TKR includes technologies such as navigated TKR, patient specific instrumentation TKR and robotic TKR.

EXPERT OPINION

In general, technology assistance results in higher accuracy of component positioning and alignment, but this is likely not clinically relevant as no clinically important difference in clinical outcomes, quality of life and complications such as revisions has been demonstrated in meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. As technology assistance in primary TKR is increasingly used to capture patient and surgeon data, surgeons have an increasingly important role in protecting their patients' data and their own data. Real world evidence of implant registries has shown that TKR without technologically assistance can achieve perfectly acceptable outcomes. Although there is a genuine hope that technology-assisted TKR may further improve these outcomes, this hope is based on promises rather than solid evidence. At the same time, technology assisted TKR is heavily promoted including direct patient marketing, which are aspects of a hype.

Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a review of the current literature

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most frequently performed interventions in the field of Orthopaedic surgery. Over the last decades the implantation technique has improved continuously. The majority of patients is satisfied with the clinical outcome of TKA. However in various clinical follow-ups, up to 20% of unsatisfied patients can be observed. Periprosthetic infection and aseptic loosening seem to be the most common reasons for failure. Malalignment has been discussed as a cause of aseptic loosening and often leads to revision surgery. In order to increase the precision of implant positioning and alignment, new technologies such as patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) have been developed. Since the introduction of PSI, multiple clinical studies have been performed analyzing the clinical and radiological outcome of TKA with PSI technique. This review covers the recent literature of PSI in respect to surgical accuracy, clinical outcome, time- and cost-effectiveness.

The Use of Navigation or Robotic-Assisted Technology in Total Knee Arthroplasty Does Not Reduce Postoperative Pain

The use of intraoperative technology (IT), such as computer-assisted navigation (CAN) and robot-assisted surgery (RA), in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is increasingly popular due to its ability to enhance surgical precision and reduce radiographic outliers. There is disputing evidence as to whether IT leads to better clinical outcomes and reduced postoperative pain. The purpose of this study was to determine if use of CAN or RA in TKA improves pain outcomes. This is a retrospective review of a multicenter randomized control trial of 327 primary TKAs. Demographics, surgical time, IT use (CAN/RA), length of stay (LOS), and opioid consumption (in morphine milligram equivalents) were collected. Analysis was done by comparing IT (n = 110) to a conventional TKA cohort (n = 217). When accounting for demographic differences and the use of a tourniquet, the IT cohort had shorter surgical time (88.77 ± 18.57 vs. 98.12 ± 22.53 minutes; p = 0.005). While postoperative day 1 pain scores were similar (p = 0.316), the IT cohort has less opioid consumption at 2 weeks (p = 0.006) and 1 month (p = 0.005) postoperatively, but not at 3 months (p = 0.058). When comparing different types of IT, CAN, and RA, we found that they had similar surgical times (p = 0.610) and pain scores (p = 0.813). Both cohorts had similar opioid consumption at 2 weeks (p = 0.092), 1 month (p = 0.058), and 3 months (p = 0.064) postoperatively. The use of IT in TKA does not yield a clinically significant reduction in pain outcomes. There was also no difference in pain or perioperative outcomes between CAN and RA technology used in TKA.

No Difference in Clinical Outcomes and Survivorship for Robotic, Navigational, and Conventional Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty with a Minimum Follow-up of 10 Years

Background

Computer-assisted surgery, including robotic and navigational total knee arthroplasty (TKA), has been proposed as a technique used to improve alignment of implants. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes during a minimum follow-up period of 10 years among robotic, navigational, and conventional TKA.

Methods

A total of 855 knees (robotic group, 194; conventional group, 270; and navigational group, 391) were available for physical and radiological examinations over a mean follow-up period of 10 years. The survival rate was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method based on the survival endpoint. The Hospital for Special Surgery score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, Knee Society Score, and range of motion were used for clinical evaluation. The hip-knee-ankle (HKA) axis angle, the coronal inclination of femoral and tibial components, and the presence of radiolucent lines were also assessed at the final follow-up.

Results

All clinical assessments at the final follow-up revealed improvements in the three groups without any significant difference among the groups (p > 0.05). The cumulative 10-year survival rate was 97.4% in the robotic group, 96.6% in the conventional group, and 98.2% in the navigational group, with no significant difference (p = 0.447). The rates of complication-associated surgery were not significantly different among the groups (p = 0.907). Only the proportion of outliers in the HKA axis angle showed a significant difference (p = 0.001), but other radiological outcomes were not significantly different among the three groups.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrated satisfactory survival rates for robotic, navigational, and conventional TKAs and similar clinical outcomes during the long-term follow-up. Larger studies with continuous serial data are needed to confirm these findings.

Time is Money! Influence on Operating Theater and Sterilization Times of Patient-specific Cutting Guides and Single-use Instrumentation for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Full Factorial Design of 136 Patients

Background

Patient-specific cutting guides (PSGs) and single-use disposable instrumentation (SUI) have emerged as potential beneficial innovations for total knee arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of PSG and SUI for total knee arthroplasty on operating room (OR) and sterilization times.

Methods

A monocentric, prospective, interventional, full factorial design study, including 136 patients, compared patient-specific (PSG, n = 68) to conventional cutting guides (n = 68) and SUI (n = 68) to conventional instrumentation (CVI, n = 68). In the OR, we recorded the number of instrument trays, operating time, and room occupancy time. In the central sterile services department, the total sterilization duration was assessed. The primary outcome was operating time and sterilization duration. Secondary outcomes were difference in the number of trays, Oxford Knee Score, and postoperative mechanical axis.

Results

The median operating time was 80 minutes (Q1-Q3: 73-90) and was significantly increased for SUI compared to that for CVI (+5 minutes, P = .0072). The median sterilization duration was 1261 minutes (Q1-Q3: 934-1603). It was significantly in favor of SUI (936 minutes) over CVI (1565 minutes) (+629 minutes, P < .0001). The total number of instrument trays was 404 for 136 patients: 252 for CVI and 152 for SUI (P < .0001) and 189 for PSG and 215 for conventional cutting guides (P = .0006). There was no significant difference in OKS (P = .86) nor in the postoperative alignment which was between 177° and 183° (75% patients, P = .24).

Conclusions

SUI lowers the number of instrument trays and sterilization duration. PSG is not associated with significant OR or sterilization time reduction. The use of SUI could reduce the risk of noncompliance of instrument trays.

[Future implications of navigation in total knee arthroplasty]

BACKGROUND

After more than two decades of experience with computer-assisted knee arthroplasty, extensive experience and study data are available, allowing a profound evaluation. Undoubtedly, computer-assisted knee arthroplasty has been proven to achieve excellent results for implant positioning and long-leg axis reconstruction. Thus, computer-assisted knee arthroplasty represents the current gold standard to avoid unintended malpositioning of total knee components for neutrally aligned implants and individualized implant alignment (kinematic alignment, adjusted mechanical alignment, and others). Previous studies could not show significant differences in functional outcomes and patient satisfaction. However, recent meta-analyses showed relevant advantages of computer-assisted knee arthroplasty. These results could be based on further developments in software-assisted soft tissue balancing and more sensitive evaluation methods of follow-up examinations.

LONG-TERM OUTCOME

Further, international registries show advantages of computer-assisted knee arthroplasty regarding long-term outcomes. In particular, the Australian arthroplasty registry describes a significantly lower revision rate due to aseptic loosening/osteolysis in the computer-assisted knee arthroplasty group, analyzing a period of up to 17 years. These positive effects can already be proven six months following surgery.

FUTURE PROSPECTS

However, despite demonstrated benefits, computer-assisted knee arthroplasty has not yet become established in daily routine, and wide regional variations in its use are observed. Newer developments such as robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty, primarily based on navigation techniques, are currently being heavily promoted. However, this new technology must justify its enormous additional costs and prove its advantages compared to computer-assisted knee arthroplasty. In the backdrop of the development of computer-assisted knee arthroplasty, this might be a difficult task.

No Difference in Quality-Of-Life Outcomes in the First 7 Years Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Performed Using Computer Navigation Versus Conventional Referencing: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

BACKGROUND

Computer navigation techniques can potentially improve both the accuracy and precision of prosthesis implantation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) but its impact on quality-of-life outcomes following surgery remains unestablished.

METHODS

An institutional arthroplasty registry was queried to identify patients with TKA performed between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2019. Propensity score matching based on demographical, medical, and surgical variables was used to match computer-navigated to conventionally referenced cases. The primary outcomes were Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey scores (VR-12 PCS and MCS), Short Form 6 Dimension utility values (SF-6D), and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) in the first 7 years following surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 629 computer-navigated TKAs were successfully matched to 1,351 conventional TKAs. The VR-12 PCS improved by a mean of 12.75 and 11.94 points in computer-navigated and conventional cases at 12-month follow-up (P = .25) and the VR-12 MCS by 6.91 and 5.93 points (P = .25), respectively. The mean VR-12 PCS improvement at 7-year follow-up (34.4% of the original matched cohort) for navigated and conventional cases was 13.00 and 12.92 points (P = .96) and for the VR-12 MCS was 4.83 and 6.30 points (P = .47), respectively. The mean improvement in the SF-6D utility score was 0.164 and 0.149 points at 12 months (P = .11) and at 7 years was 0.115 and 0.123 points (P = .69), respectively. Computer-navigated cases accumulated 0.809 QALYs in the first 7 years, compared to 0.875 QALYs in conventionally referenced cases (P = .65). There were no differences in these outcomes among a subgroup analysis of obese patients (body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m²).

CONCLUSION

The use of computer navigation did not provide an incremental benefit to quality-of-life outcomes at a mean of 2.9 years following primary TKA performed for osteoarthritis when compared to conventional referencing techniques.

Navigated and Robot-Assisted Technology in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Do Outcome Differences Achieve Minimal Clinically Important Difference?

BACKGROUND

In total knee arthroplasty (TKA), computer-assisted navigation (N-TKA) and robotic-assisted methods (RA-TKA) are intended to increase precision of mechanical and component alignment. However, the clinical significance of published patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) differences in comparison to conventional TKA (C-TKA) is unknown.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed to identify all studies reporting perioperative PROMs for either primary N-TKA or RA-TKA with a C-TKA comparison cohort with a minimum 1-year follow-up. Relative improvements in PROMs for the two cohorts were compared to published minimal clinically important difference (MCID) values.

RESULTS

After systematic review, 21 studies (N = 3,214) reporting on N-TKA and eight studies (N = 1,529) reporting on RA-TKA met inclusion criteria. Eighteen of 20 studies (90%) reported improved radiographic outcomes with N-TKA relative to C-TKA; five of five studies reported improved radiographic outcomes with RA-TKA relative to C-TKA. Five of 21 studies (24%) reported statistically significant greater improvements in clinical PROMs for N-TKA relative to C-TKA, whereas only two (10%) achieved clinical significance relative to MCID on a secondary analysis. One of 8 studies (13%) reported statistically significant greater improvements in PROMs for RA-TKA relative to C-TKA, whereas none achieved clinical significance relative to MCID on a secondary analysis. No studies reported a significant difference in revision rates.

CONCLUSION

While most studies comparing RA-TKA and N-TKA with C-TKA demonstrate improved radiographic alignment outcomes, a minority of studies reported PROM differences that achieve clinical significance. Future studies should report data and be interpreted in the context of clinical significance to establish patient and surgeon expectations for emerging technologies.

Improved Component Placement Accuracy with Robotic-Arm Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty

Component position of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been shown to influence prosthetic survivorships and clinical outcomes. Our objective was to compare the three-dimensional accuracy to plan of robotic-arm assisted TKA (RATKA) with conventional TKA for component position. We conducted a nonrandomized, prospective study comparing 143 RATKA with 86 conventional TKA operated at four U.S. centers between July 2016 and October 2018. Computed tomography (CT) scans obtained approximately 6 weeks postoperatively were analyzed using anatomical landmarks. Absolute deviation from surgical plans were defined as the absolute value of the difference between the CT measurements and surgeons' femoral and tibial component mechanical varus/valgus alignment, tibial component posterior slope, and femoral component internal/external rotation. Differences of absolute deviations were tested using stratified Wilcoxon's tests that controlled for study center. Patient-reported outcome measures collected through 1 postoperative year were modeled using multiple regression controlling for age, sex, body mass index, study center, and the preoperative score. RATKA demonstrated greater accuracy for tibial component alignment (median [25th, 75th percentiles] absolute deviation from plan of all centers combined for conventional vs. RA, 1.7 [0.9, 2.9] vs. 0.9 [0.4, 1.9] degrees, p < 0.001), femoral component rotation (1.5 [0.9, 2.5] vs. 1.3 [0.6, 2.5] degrees, p = 0.015), and tibial slope (2.9 [1.5, 5.0] vs. 1.1 [0.6, 2.0] degrees, p < 0.001). In multivariable analyses, RATKA showed significantly greater Veterans RAND 12-item health survey (VR-12) physical component scores (adjusted mean difference [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 2.4 [0.2, 4.5] points, p = 0.034) and qualitatively greater Knee Society (KS) composite functional scores (3.5 [-1.3, 8.2] points, p = 0.159), though not statistically significant. Compared with conventional instrumentation, RATKA demonstrated greater three-dimensional accuracy to plan for various component positioning parameters and clinical improvements in physical status and function with no major safety concerns during the first postoperative year. These results may be attributed to the preoperative CT scan planning, real-time intraoperative feedback, and stereotactic-guided cutting that takes into consideration patient-specific bony anatomy. These findings support the use of RATKA for enhanced arthroplasty outcomes.

No difference in long-term functional outcomes or survivorship after total knee arthroplasty with or without computer navigation: a 17-year survivorship analysis

Background

The literature comparing the long-term outcomes and survivorship of computer navigation-assisted and conventional total knee replacement (TKR) is sparse. Moreover, of the available comparative studies with follow-up duration of more than 10 years, the results seem to be conflicting. The purpose of this long-term study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes, and implant survivorship, of TKR performed with and without computer navigation.

Methods

We retrospectively compared the results of 49 computer-navigated TKRs and 139 conventional TKRs. The mean age of the patients was 67.9 (range 52–81) years for the navigation group and 67.1 (range 50–80) years for the conventional TKR group. The mean duration of follow-up for the conventional and navigation TKR groups was 12.9 and 13.2 years, respectively. Clinical and radiographic follow-up examinations of the patients were performed at 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months post-operatively, and at 1-year intervals thereafter.

Results

There were no significant differences in the post-operative Knee Society knee and function score between the two groups. The mean overall deviation from neutral alignment and the radiological outliers were significantly higher in the conventional TKR group. The overall survival rates at 17 years were 92.9% for the navigation group and 95.6% for the conventional TKR group (p = 0.62).

Conclusions

Navigated TKR resulted in fewer radiological outliers; however, this did not translate to better long-term functional outcomes or implant survival.

The successful implementation of the Navio robotic technology required 29 cases

Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) has potential benefits of improved restoration of mechanical alignment, accuracy of bony resection, and balancing. The purpose of this study was to determine the number of cases necessary for a single surgeon to achieve a constant, steady-state surgical time. The secondary purpose was to identify which steps demonstrated the most time reduced. This was a prospective study assessing intraoperative time for 60 RA-TKA with the Navio surgical system. Overall arthroplasty time and duration for each step were recorded. Statistical analysis included a nonlinear regression and survival regression. Successful implementation required 29 cases to achieve a steady-state. The average time decreased from 41.8 min for the first cohort to 31.1 min for the last cohort, a 26% decrease. The step with the greatest reduction was the "Review of Intraoperative Plan" with a reduction of 2.1 min. This study demonstrates surgical times averaging below 60 min and a learning curve that is complete in 29 cases with the surgeon reporting a high level of confidence with the system at 10 cases. Though Navio assisted TKA showed a significantly slower operative time, we are hopeful that future generations of robotic technology will be more efficiently implemented by surgeons.

Efficacy Analysis of Selection of Distal Reference Point for Tibial Coronal Plane Osteotomy during Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Literature Review

Total knee arthroplasty is an effective treatment for end-stage knee osteoarthritis. The tibial platform osteotomy must take full account of the coronal plane, the sagittal plane, and the rotational alignment of the tibial prosthesis. During surgery, individual differences in the coronal alignment of the tibia need to be taken into account as poor alignment after surgery can lead to rapid wear of the tibial platform, reducing the longevity of the prosthesis and adversely affecting quality of life. Intraoperative tibial osteotomies are often performed using extramedullary alignment. When an extramedullary alignment approach is used, the proximal tibial osteotomy guide is usually placed in the medial third of the tibial tuberosity. There is no consensus on the most reliable anatomical landmarks or axes for achieving distal tibial coronary alignment. Anatomical points or reference axes that are highly reproducible and precise need to be identified. From available data it appears that most surgeons use the extensor hallucis longus tendon, the second metatarsal, and the anterior tibial cortex to determine the distal localization point. However, its accuracy has not been confirmed in clinical and radiographic data, and the alignment concept and preoperative planning for total knee arthroplasty has paid more attention to rotational alignment, but there are few studies on the coronal alignment of the tibia. This article reviews the recent use of the distal tibial coronal osteotomy reference point in total knee arthroplasty. However, due to there being only a small number of studies available, the evidence collected is insufficient to prove that a certain reference axis has obvious advantages and a combination of different reference points is needed to achieve the ideal lower extremity force line angle.

Reduced postoperative morbidity in computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: A retrospective comparison of 225,123 cases

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most common elective surgical procedures in the United States, with more than 650,000 performed annually. Computer navigation technology has recently been introduced to assist surgeons with planning, performing, and assessing TKA bone cuts. The aim of this study is to assess postoperative complication rates after TKA performed using computer navigation assistance versus conventional methods.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was queried for unilateral TKA cases from 2008 to 2016. The presence of the CPT modifier for use of computer navigation was used to separate cases of computer-navigated TKA from conventional TKA. Multivariate and propensity-matched logistic regression analyses were performed to control for demographics and comorbidities.

RESULTS

There were 225,123 TKA cases included; 219,880 were conventional TKA (97.7%) and 5,243 were navigated (2.3%). Propensity matching identified 4,811 case pairs. Analysis demonstrated no significant differences in operative time, length of stay, reoperation, or readmission, and no differences in rates of post-op mortality at 30 days postoperatively. Compared to conventional cases, navigated cases were at lower risk of serious medical morbidity (18% lower, p = 0.009) within the first 30 days postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

After controlling for multiple known risk factors, navigated TKA patients demonstrated lower risk for medical morbidity, predominantly driven by lower risk for blood transfusion. Given these findings, computer-navigation is a safe surgical technique in TKA.

Navigation assisted total knee arthroplasty in 54,114 patients: No increased risk in acute complications and hospital utilisation

BACKGROUND

The advent of navigation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has generated interest in attempt to improve component positioning as desired and clinical outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate 90-day complication and cost of navigation-assisted TKAs (NTKA) compared to conventional TKAs (CTKA) using a national database.

METHODS

A retrospective review of national database was conducted on all patients who underwent TKA from 2010 and 2017. The cohort was stratified into NTKA and CTKA subcohorts, excluding cases utilizing robotics.

RESULTS

NTKA was associated with a significant decrease in 90-day postoperative major and minor complications. NTKA was also associated with a decrease in 90-day hospital utilization with lower rates of emergency department visits and readmissions. The cost of hospitalization and total 90-day costs were lower in NTKA, with an average savings of $800.

CONCLUSION

The adoption of navigation in TKA is safe and efficaceous compared to CTKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III. Retrospective cohort study.

No clinical difference between TiN-coated versus uncoated cementless CoCrMo mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty; 10-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

Improvement of biomechanical properties of cobalt-chromium-molybdenum (CoCrMo) implant surface and reduction of adhesive wear is achieved by titanium-nitride (TiN) coating in vitro. Less pain, higher postoperative outcome scores and a lower revision rate after TKA with a TiN-coated CoCrMo TKA compared with uncoated CoCrMo TKA after 10-year follow-up was hypothesized.

METHODS

In a double-blinded RCT, 101 patients received a cementless mobile-bearing CoCrMo TKA, either TiN-coated or uncoated. The primary outcome measure was the visual analogue scale (VAS) score for pain and secondary outcome measures were the Knee Society Score (KSS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), revision rate and adverse events. Patients were assessed at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 5 years and 10 years, postoperatively.

RESULTS

68 patients (67%) were available for 10-year follow-up. No difference was found in any of the assessed outcome measures with a mean decrease in VAS score (31.6 ± 22.9) and a mean increase in OKS (10.9 ± 8.4), KSS (29.3 ± 31.4), KSSK (26.4 ± 18.2) and KSSF (4.1 ± 22.9). Overall revision rate was 7% (coated 6% vs uncoated 8%) without additional revision procedures between 5 and 10-year follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The in vitro potential benefits of TiN coating did not result in better clinical outcome when compared to an uncoated cementless TKA. Pain, functional outcome and revision rates were comparable after 10-year follow-up. TiN-coated cementless TKA provides comparable good long-term results, similar to uncoated cementless CoCrMo TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 1, Therapeutic Study NETHERLANDS TRIAL REGISTER: NL2887/NTR3033.

Pros and cons of navigated versus conventional total knee arthroplasty-a retrospective analysis of over 2400 patients

INTRODUCTION

Because of the ongoing discussion of imageless navigation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), its advantages and disadvantages were evaluated in a large patient cohort.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included 2464 patients who had undergone TKA at a high-volume university arthroplasty center between 2012 and 2017. Navigated and conventional TKA were compared regarding postoperative mechanical axis, surgery duration, complication rates, one-year postoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) (WOMAC and EQ-5D indices), and responder rates as defined by the criteria of the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology and Osteoarthritis Research Society International consensus (OMERACT-OARSI).

RESULTS

Both navigated (1.8 ± 1.6°) and conventional TKA (2.1 ± 1.6°, p = 0.002) enabled the exact reconstruction of mechanical axis. Surgery duration was six minutes longer for navigated TKA than for conventional TKA (p < 0.001). Complication rates were low in both groups with comparable frequencies: neurological deficits (p = 0.39), joint infection (p = 0.42 and thromboembolic events (p = 0.03). Periprosthetic fractures occurred more frequently during conventional TKA (p = 0.001). One-year PROMs showed excellent improvement in both groups. The WOMAC index was statistically higher for navigated TKA than for conventional TKA (74.7 ± 19.0 vs. 71.7 ± 20.7, p = 0.014), but the increase was not clinically relevant. Both groups had a similarly high EQ-5D index (0.23 ± 0.24 vs. 0.26 ± 0.25, p = 0.11) and responder rate (86.5% [256/296] vs. 85.9% [981/1142], p = 0.92).

CONCLUSION

Both methods enable accurate postoperative leg alignment with low complication rates and equally successful PROMs and responder rates one year postoperatively.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III. Retrospective cohort study.

New Technologies in Knee Arthroplasty: Current Concepts

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an effective treatment for severe osteoarthritis. Despite good survival rates, up to 20% of TKA patients remain dissatisfied. Recently, promising new technologies have been developed in knee arthroplasty, and could improve the functional outcomes. The aim of this paper was to present some new technologies in TKA, their current concepts, their advantages, and limitations. The patient-specific instrumentations can allow an improvement of implant positioning and limb alignment, but no difference is found for functional outcomes. The customized implants are conceived to reproduce the native knee anatomy and to reproduce its biomechanics. The sensors have to aim to give objective data on ligaments balancing during TKA. Few studies are published on the results at mid-term of these two devices currently. The accelerometers are smart tools developed to improve the TKA alignment. Their benefits remain yet controversial. The robotic-assisted systems allow an accurate and reproducible bone preparation due to a robotic interface, with a 3D surgical planning, based on preoperative 3D imaging or not. This promising system, nevertheless, has some limits. The new technologies in TKA are very attractive and have constantly evolved. Nevertheless, some limitations persist and could be improved by artificial intelligence and predictive modeling.

Robotic Surgery in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Survey of the AAHKS Membership to Understand the Utilization, Motivations, and Perceptions of Total Joint Surgeons

BACKGROUND

In the past decade, the popularity of robot arm assistance in total joint arthroplasty has outpaced the reporting of long-term data. This study aimed to understand the motivations for use and perceptions of the technology among total joint surgeons.

METHODS

An online survey was distributed to the membership of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons. The questions were asked for respondent's motivations for utilization of the technology, perceptions regarding outcomes and training, and personal characteristics that may have influenced responses.

RESULTS

Increased precision was the primary reason for users (73.1%) to utilize robot arm assistance in total joint procedures. Nonusers were just as likely to consider adopting the technology because of increase precision and marketing (P = .590). Nonclinical reasons such as marketing, administrative pressure, and peer pressure were primary motivators for 19.7% of users of the technology. Respondents regardless of financial interest and use of the technology felt that robot arm assistance increased operative time (76.5%) and was not more cost-effective than traditional methods (78.7%). Most American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons members felt that 20-40 surgical cases were needed to become competent with the technique (54.1%). A unique finding of this study is that a larger proportion of orthopedic surgeons considered themselves "innovators" or "early adopters," based on Roger's diffusion of innovations, than was expected for the general population.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that the decision to adopt robot arm assistance in total joint arthroplasty is multifactorial and may have a significant contribution from nonclinical factors and inherent surgeon characteristics. Continued evaluation of surgeon perceptions will be valuable as new evidence emerges regarding long-term outcomes.

Postoperative radiologic outcome comparison between conventional and computer-assisted navigation total knee arthroplasty in extra-articular tibia vara

PURPOSE

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the definite treatment for osteoarthritis. Meanwhile, significant inherent extra-articular varus angulation is associated with abnormal postoperative hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle. Computer-assisted navigation TKA (CAS-TKA) used in patients who have severe varus deformity. The purpose of this study was to compare postoperative radiologic outcome between CAS-TKA and conventional TKA for extra-articular tibia vara.

METHODS

A retrospective review of postoperative HKA on standing lower extremity views was conducted in patients who underwent TKA by a single surgeon from 2010 to 2018, including knee with conventional TKA (n = 83) and CAS-TKA (n = 246). Extra-articular tibia vara was assessed by measuring the metaphyseal-diaphyseal angle (MDA) of the tibia in preoperative standing lower extremity view. Postoperative alignment was assessed by measuring the HKA in postoperative standing lower extremity view.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in age (p = 0.063), gender (p = 0.628), body mass index (p = 0.426), preoperative range of motion (p = 0.524), preoperative HKA (p = 0.306), preoperative MDA (p = 0.523), or postoperative HKA (p = 0.416) between the two groups (conventional TKA and CAS-TKA). There was no significant difference in postoperative alignment for cases with MDA ≤4° (p = 0.351) or MDA >4° (p = 0.866) in each group. There was a positive correlation between preoperative HKA and postoperative HKA in the CAS-TKA group (p < 0.001, r = 0.243). However, there was no significant correlation between preoperative HKA and postoperative HKA in the conventional TKA group (p = 0.732).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference in postoperative alignment between conventional TKA and CAS-TKA in extra-articular tibial vara even for cases with MDA >4°.

Accuracy of tibial component placement in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty performed using an accelerometer-based portable navigation system

PURPOSE

There is a need for new devices to improve the accuracy of implantation in unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (UKAs). The accelerometer-based portable navigation system is expected to improve this accuracy. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of UKAs performed by the portable navigation system with that of the conventional method, and to investigate whether the portable navigation system can complement the surgeon's experience.

METHODS

The study comprised of 80 Oxford UKAs. Knees were divided into two groups based on the method of tibial osteotomy: the conventional group (37 UKAs performed by an experienced surgeon using the extra-medullary guide) and the portable navigation group (43 UKAs performed by 2 unaccustomed surgeons using the navigation system). The absolute error from the target angle on the coronal and sagittal plane was measured on whole lower leg X-ray. The incidence of outliers (> 3°) was compared between the groups using Fisher's exact probability test.

RESULTS

The incidences of outliers on the coronal plane were 41.0% (15 of 37 knees) in the conventional group and 9.3% (4 of 43 knees) in the portable navigation group (p < 0.0001). The incidences of outliers on the sagittal plane were 13.5% (5 of 37 knees) in the conventional group and 14.0% (6 of 43 knees) in the portable navigation group (p = 0.3772).

CONCLUSION

This is the first report on the usefulness of an accelerometer-based portable navigation system in UKA. The use of this system improves the accuracy of implantation of the tibial component beyond the experience of the surgeon.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective comparative study, Level III.

Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty vs Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Nationwide Database Study

Background

As robot-assisted equipment is continuously being used in orthopaedic surgery, the past few decades have seen an increase in the usage of robotics for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Thus, the purpose of the present study is to investigate the differences between robotic TKA and nonrobotic TKA on perioperative and postoperative complications and opioid consumption.

Methods

An administrative database was queried from 2010 to Q2 of 2017 for primary TKAs performed via robot-assisted surgery vs non-robot-assisted surgery. Systemic and joint complications and average morphine milligram equivalents were collected and compared with statistical analysis.

Results

Patients in the nonrobotic TKA cohort had higher levels of prosthetic revision at 1-year after discharge (P < .05) and higher levels of manipulation under anesthesia at 90 days and 1-year after discharge (P < .05). Furthermore, those in the nonrobotic TKA cohort had increased occurrences of deep vein thrombosis, altered mental status, pulmonary embolism, anemia, acute renal failure, cerebrovascular event, pneumonia, respiratory failure, and urinary tract infection during the inpatient hospital stay (all P < .05) and at 90 days after discharge (all P < .05). All of these categories remained statistically increased at the 90-days postdischarge date, except pneumonia and stroke. Patients in the nonrobotic TKA cohort had higher levels of average morphine milligram equivalents consumption at all time periods measured (P < .001).

Conclusions

In the present study, the use of robotics for TKA found lower revision rates, lower incidences of manipulation under anesthesia, decreased occurrence of systemic complications, and lower opiate consumption for postoperative pain management. Future studies should look to further examine the long-term outcomes for patients undergoing robot-assisted TKA.

Level of Evidence

Level III.

New technology-based assistive techniques in total knee arthroplasty: A Bayesian network meta-analysis and systematic review

BACKGROUND

The radiological and clinical efficiency among robot-assisted surgery (RAS), computer-assisted navigation system (CAS) and conventional (CON) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial.

METHODS

Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) and systematic review were performed to investigate radiological and clinical efficiency respectively. The certainty of the evidence was evaluated using GRADE and CERQual tool.

RESULTS

Thirty-four RCTs (7289 patients and 7424 knees) were included. The NMA showed that RAS-TKA had the highest probability for mechanical axis restoration (odds ratio for RAS vs. CAS 3.79, CrI 1.14 to 20.54, very low certainty), followed by CAS-TKA (odds ratio for CAS vs. CON 2.55, CrI 1.67 to 4.01, very low certainty) and then CON-TKA, without significant differences in other radiological parameters. No differences were found in clinical outcomes after qualitative systematic review (overall low certainty).

CONCLUSIONS

Technology-based assistive techniques (CAS and RAS) may surpass the CON-TKA, when considering higher radiological accuracy and comparable clinical outcomes. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Accurate implant fit and leg alignment after cruciate-retaining patient-specific total knee arthroplasty

Background

For improved outcomes in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) correct implant fitting and positioning are crucial. In order to facilitate a best possible implant fitting and positioning patient-specific systems have been developed. However, whether or not these systems allow for better implant fitting and positioning has yet to be elucidated. For this reason, the aim was to analyse the novel patient-specific cruciate retaining knee replacement system iTotal™ CR G2 that utilizes custom-made implants and instruments for its ability to facilitate accurate implant fitting and positioning including correction of the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA).

Methods

We assessed radiographic results of 106 patients who were treated with the second generation of a patient-specific cruciate retaining knee arthroplasty using iTotal™ CR G2 (ConforMIS Inc.) for tricompartmental knee osteoarthritis (OA) using custom-made implants and instruments. The implant fit and positioning as well as the correction of the mechanical axis (hip-knee-ankle angle, HKA) and restoration of the joint line were determined using pre- and postoperative radiographic analyses.

Results

On average, HKA was corrected from 174.4° ± 4.6° preoperatively to 178.8° ± 2.2° postoperatively and the coronal femoro-tibial angle was adjusted on average 4.4°. The measured preoperative tibial slope was 5.3° ± 2.2° (mean +/− SD) and the average postoperative tibial slope was 4.7° ± 1.1° on lateral views. The joint line was well preserved with an average modified Insall-Salvati index of 1.66 ± 0.16 pre- and 1.67 ± 0.16 postoperatively. The overall accuracy of fit of implant components was decent with a measured medial overhang of more than 1 mm (1.33 mm ± 0.32 mm) in 4 cases only. Further, a lateral overhang of more than 1 mm (1.8 mm ± 0.63) (measured in the anterior-posterior radiographs) was observed in 11 cases, with none of the 106 patients showing femoral notching.

Conclusion

The patient-specific iTotal™ CR G2 total knee replacement system facilitated a proper fitting and positioning of the implant components. Moreover, a good restoration of the leg axis towards neutral alignment was achieved as planned. Nonetheless, further clinical follow-up studies are necessary to validate our findings and to determine the long-term impact of using this patient- specific system.

Templating in shoulder arthroplasty - A comparison of 2D CT to 3D CT planning software: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Computed tomography (CT) utilizing computer software technology to generate three-dimensional (3D) rendering of the glenoid has become the preferred method for preoperative planning. It remains largely unknown what benefits this software may have to the intraoperative placement of the components and patient outcomes.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review is to compare 2D CT to 3D CT planning in total shoulder arthroplasty.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHODS

A systematic database search was conducted for relevant studies evaluating the role of 3D CT planning in total shoulder arthroplasty. The primary outcome was component placement variability, and the secondary outcomes were intra- and inter-observer reliability in the context of preoperative planning.

RESULTS

Following title-abstract and full-text screening, six eligible studies were included in the review (n = 237). The variability in glenoid measurements between 3D CT and 2D CT planning ranged from no significant difference to a 5° difference in version and 1.7° difference in inclination (p<0.05). Posterior bone loss was underestimated in 52% of the 2D measured patients relative to 3D CT groups. Irrespective of 2D and 3D planning (39% and 43% of cases respectively), surgeons elected to implant larger components than those templated. There was no literature identified comparing differences in time, cost, functional outcomes, complications, or patient satisfaction.

CONCLUSION

The paucity of evidence exploring clinical parameters makes it difficult to comment on clinical outcomes using different methods of templating. More studies are required to identify how improved radiographic outcomes translate into improvements that are clinically meaningful to patients.

Short-term follow-up of kinematically vs. mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty with medial pivot components: A case-control study

INTRODUCTION

The kinematic alignment (KA) technique for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and the medial pivot (MP) component design are two options promoting a physiologic prosthetic knee kinematics when used in combination that could improve TKA outcomes. Case-control study is initiated to compare the 1-year radio-clinical outcomes between kinematic alignment medial pivot total knee arthroplasty (KA MP-TKAs) and mechanical alignment medial pivot total knee arthroplasty (MA MP-TKA). Goal of a study was to answer the following questions: Do KA MP-TKAs patients have improved functional outcomes compared to MA MP-TKAs patients? (Q1); Do prosthetic knee and lower limb alignments differ between KA and MA patients (Q2)? And does kinematic implantation of MP TKA has higher risk of reoperations and revisions (Q3)?

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A case-control study was carried out to compare the 1-year clinical and radiographic outcomes between 24 consecutive KA-TKA patients and 24 matched MA-TKA patients. All patients had implantation with manual instruments and a cemented medial pivot TKA with excision of the PCL. All data were collected prospectively, and outcome scores were patient reported.

RESULTS

KA patients had superior values in Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) at 1-year (KA 77 vs. MA 51) (p=0.05) follow-up. After one year KA patients scored better in objective section of the new Knee Society Score (KSS) (p=0.02), and in sport section of the Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) (p=0.01). Eleven out of 24 patients (46%) in KA group and 7/24 patients (29%) in MA group had limb alignment out of 180°±3°, whereas 17/24 (70%) of KA patients, and 14/24 (58%) of MA patients had orientation of tibial component with more than 3° of varus. No reoperation or revision occurred in either group.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

The KA of MP TKA design seems to have a good efficacy at early-term, with some 1-year functional performance higher to the ones from MA MP TKAs. Further research is needed to define if those early results will last over time.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, case-controlled study.

Tibial alignment technique and its influence on clinical and functional outcomes following total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Restoration of neutral mechanical axis is thought to influence implant survival and function in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). There is no consensus whether Intramedullary (IM) or Extramedullary (EM) tibial alignment technique is superior to achieve this outcome. Study aims to evaluate functional and radiological outcome of TKA using the EM and IM technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study of 400 primary TKA (314 patients) was performed. 200 knees were studied in each IM and EM group, which were matched. Functional assessment was performed using Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and Tibial component alignment measured in coronal and sagittal radiographs.

RESULTS

The average coronal and sagittal alignment of the tibial component in IM group was 89.16° and 88°, whereas in EM group, these were 88.1° and 88.5° respectively. The adjusted mean difference change in Pre and Post-operative OKS in IM group compared to EM group was 0.5 (p = 0.52). There was no statistically significant difference in the complications between the two groups. Subgroup analysis of patients with BMI >35 showed predictable coronal tibial alignment with IM technique with fewer outliers.

CONCLUSION

Intramedullary tibial alignment is associated with fewer outliers compared to the extramedullary technique particularly in patients with a BMI over 35.

Computer Navigation-Assisted Knee Replacement Demonstrates Improved Outcome Compared with Conventional Knee Replacement at Mid-Term Follow-up: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

The study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective randomised control studies and prospective cohort studies of mid-term functional outcome of total knee replacement undertaken using imageless computer navigation compared with conventional instrumented total knee replacement. The literature search strategy included a search of the electronic databases, visual scanning of reference lists, hand searching of key journals and conference proceedings, and abstracts, citations, and trial registers. In total, 440 papers were retrieved after removal of duplicates, and with further screening, 11 papers were included in the systematic review and 6 papers were considered appropriate for meta-analysis. Analysis of the data showed evidence of a modest improvement in functional outcome at mid-term follow-up with use of imageless computer navigation assistance compared with conventional instrumented total knee replacement with a total score point estimate of 3.36 confidence interval (CI) (- 0.583, 7.298), objective score point estimate of 1.45 CI (0.11, 2.799), and functional score point estimate of 2.4, CI (- 1.174, 5.977). The predominant risk of bias was from random allocation and attrition. There is evidence of a modest improvement in functional outcome with the use of imageless computer navigation assistance compared with conventional instrumented total knee replacement at mid-term follow-up.

Handheld, accelerometer-based navigation versus conventional instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Precise and accurate alignments in total knee arthroplasty are important predictors for survivorship and functional outcomes. We aim to compare accelerometer-based navigation (ABN) to conventional instrumentation (CONV), patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) and computer-assisted surgery (CAS) in published literature.

METHODS

A systematic search of publications from databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane) was obtained from inception to 15 August 2018. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool odd ratios for outliers greater than 3° for the hip-knee-ankle, coronal and sagittal femoral and tibial angles (CFA, CTA, SFA, STA). Secondary outcomes included procedural characteristics and functional outcomes.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies, involving 1566 patients, met inclusion that compared ABN (50.2%) to CONV (49.8%) and five comparing ABN to CAS/PSI. The pooled odds ratios for percent outliers of greater than 3° from the mechanical axis for the hip-knee-ankle (relative risk 0.58, P = <0.05) and CFA (relative risk 0.42, P = 0.02) was significantly lower for ABN compared to CONV. The pooled odds ratios for CTA, SFA and STA were not significantly different. No differences were identified in comparison to PSI/CAS. There was no statistically significant difference in procedural characteristics and functional outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The use ABN in total knee arthroplasty is a successful method of increased precision and accuracy for the restoration of the mechanical axis. In addition, there is no significant compromise in procedural or functional outcomes.

Conventional instruments are more accurate for measuring the depth of the tibial cut than computer-assisted surgery in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective study

INTRODUCTION

The most commonly used tool for implant positioning are conventional instruments (CI) followed by computer-assisted surgery (CAS). A number of studies have investigated the cutting error of the tibial component when CAS is used, but most of them were focused on the cutting angles. The accuracy of CAS to determine the depth of the cut has not received much attention, even though implications are similar or worse, than with an angle mismatch.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was an ethics board approved, prospective study of 23 consecutive varus TKAs by a single surgeon. Implant positioning was performed using CAS; however, the depth of the tibial cut was determined with both CAS and CI. Targeted alignment was the mechanical axis and 3° of posterior slope. The planned and the achieved cut, as determined by CAS needed to match. The achieved cut was then measured using a caliper and compared to the depth of the cut as per CAS. Medial and lateral cuts were analyzed separately. Analysis of variance and Bland-Altman plots were used for the comparison.

RESULTS

Mean medial navigated cut was 6.3 (± 2.2) mm, mean measured medial cut was 6.6 (± 2.3) mm. Mean lateral navigated cut was 8.9 (± 1.8) mm, mean measured lateral cut was 8.8 (± 1.5) mm. There was a statistical significance for both the medial (p < 0.001) and the lateral (p = 0.004) navigated and measured cuts.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that the tibial cut depth, measured by the navigation, does not match the actual bony cuts performed, even if a perfect cut was achieved in both sagittal and coronal plane. Surgeons should be aware of the measurement error in the navigation system and potentially add an additional step for verifying the achieved depth of the cut.

Outcomes of Computer-Assisted Surgery Compared with Conventional Instrumentation in 19,221 Total Knee Arthroplasties: Results After a Mean of 4.5 Years of Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

Studies have shown improved alignment in association with the use of computer-assisted surgery (CAS) as compared with conventional instrumentation during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) but have failed to show a consistent clinical benefit. The aim of the present study was to compare the revision rates and functional outcomes following TKA performed with either CAS or conventional instrumentation. Recognizing that selection bias may arise from the preferential use of CAS in difficult or complex cases, the implant survival data and postoperative functional scores were analyzed with reference to whether the surgeon routinely performed TKA with use of CAS or conventional instrumentation.

METHODS

Revision rates and functional data in terms of the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) at 6 months, 5 years, and 10 years were obtained from the New Zealand Joint Registry (NZJR) for 19,221 TKAs performed from 2006 to 2018.These data were analyzed by comparing 2 cohorts of patients: those managed by high-volume surgeons who routinely used CAS ("routine CAS" surgeons) and those managed by high-volume surgeons who routinely used conventional instrumentation ("routine conventional" surgeons). The mean duration of follow-up was 4.5 years (range, 0 to 12 years).

RESULTS

The revision rate per 100 component-years was 0.437 for the "routine CAS" surgeons, compared with 0.440 for the "routine conventional" surgeons (p = 0.724). For patients <65 years of age, the revision rate per 100 component-years was equivalent for the "routine CAS" and "routine conventional" surgeons (0.585 compared with 0.508; p = 0.524). The OKS scores were similar at 6 months (38.88 compared with 38.52; p = 0.172), 5 years (42.26 compared with 41.77; p = 0.206), and 10 years (41.59 compared with 41.74; p = 0.893) when comparing the 2 cohorts. Surgeons who had performed >50 TKAs with use of CAS took 10 minutes longer on average than those who used conventional instrumentation (92 compared with 82 minutes; p = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study demonstrated no difference in survivorship or functional outcome scores to support using CAS for TKA. Experienced surgeons using CAS had longer operative durations than comparable surgeons using conventional instrumentation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Frequency, Cost, and Clinical Significance of Incidental Findings on Preoperative Planning Images for Computer-Assisted Total Joint Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The frequency of incidental findings with computer-assisted total joint arthroplasty (CA TJA) preoperative imaging and their clinical significance are currently unknown.

METHODS

We reviewed 573 patients who underwent primary CA TJA requiring planning imaging. Incidental findings were defined as reported findings excluding those related to the planned arthroplasty. Secondary outcomes were additional tests or a delay in surgery. Associated charges were obtained from our institution's website. Charge and incidence data were combined with TJA volumes obtained from the 2016 National Inpatient Sample to model costs to the healthcare system.

RESULTS

Overall, 262 patients (45.7%) had at least 1 incidental finding, 144 patients (25.1%) had 2, and 65 (11.3%) had 3. The most common finding types were musculoskeletal (MSK, 67.7%), digestive (19.5%), cardiovascular (4.9%), and reproductive (4.7%). Also, 9.3% of patients had at least 1 non-MSK incidental finding. Both MSK and non-MSK incidental findings were more common with total hip arthroplasty compared to total knee arthroplasty (67.9% vs 42.2%, P < .0001, and 15.4% vs 8.3%, P < .05, respectively). Further testing was required in 6 cases (1.0%); 1 case required delay in surgery (0.2%). Using the 2016 volume of TJA procedures and assuming a 10%, 15%, and 25%, utilization rate of image-based CA TJA, the annual cost of additional testing was $2.7 million (95% confidence interval, $1.1-$6.3 million), $4.1 million ($1.6-$9.5 million), and $6.9 million (95% confidence interval, $2.7-$15.8 million), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Incidental findings are relatively common on planning images. Stakeholders should be aware of the hidden costs of incidental findings given the increasing popularity of image-based CA TJA.

A prospective randomized study comparing navigation versus conventional total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Navigation is associated with improved accuracy in alignment. However, its influence on clinical outcome is inconclusive. The aim of this study was to compare the component alignment and functional outcome in patients undergoing navigation-assisted and conventional total knee replacement (TKR).

MATERIALS AND METHOD

A prospective randomized study consisting of two groups (group A and group B) was carried out. Group A consisted of patients undergoing TKR using conventional jig-based method, whereas group B consisted of patients undergoing TKR using computer navigation-assisted method. We measured and compared the coronal and sagittal plane alignment in X-ray and rotational alignment in computed tomography scan between both groups. Functional outcome was analysed using Knee Society Score (KSS) and Western Ontario and McMaster University scale (WOMAC) score.

RESULTS

A total of 50 patients were randomized into two groups A and B each with 25 patients. Navigation was associated with more accuracy in mechanical axis alignment ( p = 0.011) and femoral component rotation ( p = 0.033). The mean follow-up was 4.6 years (range 48-62 months). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups with respect to KSS and WOMAC score at the minimum follow-up of 4 years.

CONCLUSION

We concluded that even though navigation-assisted system is associated with better accuracy, there was no difference in clinical outcome at an average follow-up of 4.6 years.

An umbrella review comparing computer-assisted and conventional total joint arthroplasty: quality assessment and summary of evidence

Background

Systematic reviews (SRs) of computer-assisted (CA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) report conflicting evidence on its superiority over conventional surgery. Little is known about the quality of these SRs; variability in their methodological quality may be a contributing factor. We evaluated the methodological quality of all published SRs to date, summarized and examined the consistency of the evidence generated by these SRs.

Methods

We searched four databases through December 31, 2018. A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR 2) was applied to assess the methodological quality. Evidence from included meta-analyses on functional, radiological and patient-safety outcomes was summarized. The corrected covered area was calculated to assess the overlap between SRs in including the primary studies.

Results

Based on AMSTAR 2, confidence was critically low in 39 of the 42 included SRs and low in 3 SRs. Low rating was mainly due to failure in developing a review protocol (90.5%); providing a list of excluded studies (81%); accounting for risk of bias when discussing the results (67%); using a comprehensive search strategy (50%); and investigating publication bias (50%). Despite inconsistency between SR findings comparing functional, radiological and patient safety outcomes for CA and conventional procedures, most TKA meta-analyses favored CA TKA, whereas most THA meta-analyses showed no difference. Moderate overlap was observed among TKA SRs and high overlap among THA SRs.

Conclusions

Despite conclusions of meta-analyses favoring CA arthroplasty, decision makers adopting this technology should be aware of the low confidence in the results of the included SRs. To improve confidence in future SRs, journals should consider using a methodological assessment tool to evaluate the SRs prior to making a publication decision.

Different targets of mechanical alignment do not improve knee outcomes after TKA

BACKGROUND

Accurate alignment is a basic principle of TKA surgery, but achieving alignment within this target may not translate into superior outcomes after surgery.

PURPOSE

To assess if neutral TKA mechanical alignment was associated with superior knee outcomes and to examine the effect of various aspects of pre-operative and post-operative alignment on knee function.

METHODS

Analysis of a database of 444 TKA patients between June 2009 and October 2016. Knee outcomes (WOMAC, AKSS and knee range of motion) were collected before surgery and during follow-up at a minimum of six months.

RESULTS

Analysis included 444 TKA patients (62% female, mean age 66 years, mean follow-up 23 months). Deformity varied from 21° varus (mean = 7.9, SD = 2.8) to 17° valgus deformity (mean = 7.7, SD = 2.8). Pre-operatively, 101 (23%) knees were in native neutral mechanical alignment, while 278 (63%) were in varus and 65 (15%) were in valgus. Post-operatively, a group of 365 (82%) TKA were found to be in neutral mechanical alignment and a group of 79 (18%) TKA were noted to be 'Outliers' (17 [4%] TKA > 3° varus and 62 [14%] TKA > 3° valgus alignment). Restoration of the target of alignment of 0 ± 3° or 0 ± 1°, did not have better functional outcomes scores, range of motion or prosthesis longevity than those in the outlier range.

CONCLUSION

Neutral TKA alignment did not appear to be a significant contributing factor to the improvement in knee function in short-medium term follow-up.

A Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes of Computer-Navigated and Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

It is not clear whether long-term outcomes differ between computer-navigated and conventional total knee arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to perform a meta-analysis comparing the radiographic outcomes, the long-term functional outcomes, and survivorship between computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty and conventional total knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify studies comparing long-term outcomes between computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Randomized controlled trials with mean follow-up durations of >8 years were included. The meta-analysis compared radiographic outcomes (postoperative alignment), functional outcomes (range of motion and patient-reported outcomes), and survivorship of the 2 techniques.

RESULTS

Nine studies were included. A meta-analysis of accuracy revealed better outcomes in computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty when compared with conventional total knee arthroplasty in terms of the sagittal alignment of the femoral component (risk ratio [RR], 0.69; [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.51 to 0.93]; p = 0.02) and the coronal alignment of the tibial component (RR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.60 to 0.95]; p = 0.02). The mechanical axis of the lower extremity, the coronal alignment of the femoral component, and the sagittal alignment of the tibial component did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. The functional outcomes did not differ significantly between the 2 techniques. Both in terms of the revision rate and the incidence of aseptic loosening, there were no differences between the 2 techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

Although computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty resulted in better outcomes in postoperative component alignment than conventional total knee arthroplasty, there were no significant differences in long-term functional outcomes and survivorship between the 2 techniques. To fully evaluate the utility of computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty, additional randomized controlled studies including diverse ethnic groups and countries, as well as studies evaluating the correlation between postoperative alignment and long-term survivorship, are necessary.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Individualized alignment in total knee arthroplasty using image-based robotic assistance : Video article

Introduction

Over the past decades many innovations were introduced in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) focusing on implant longevity and higher procedural precision; however, there are still a high number of dissatisfied patients. It was reported that better anatomical alignment may result in improved patient outcome; however, current technologies have limitations to achieve this. The aim of this video article is to describe the technique of individualized alignment in TKA with the use of image-based robotic assistance.

Methods

The technology is based on an individual patient knee model computed from segmented computed tomography (CT) scans. A preoperative planning of prosthesis position is conducted following the principle of kinematic alignment. Intraoperatively the soft tissue envelope is recorded and the computer predicts the gap balance based on the virtual planning. The prosthesis position is then adapted to achieve balanced gaps and to avoid soft tissue release. This technique is shown in a cadaver operation and clinical examples of two patients are described.

Results

With the combination of anatomically oriented prosthesis positioning and minor adaptations with respect to the soft tissue, an individualized alignment is achieved with reduced need of soft tissue release. The robotic-assisted surgery guarantees a precise implementation of the planning. The initial experience showed a promising outcome in short-term follow-up.

Video online

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00132-018-3637-1) contains a video on patient individualized alignment in total knee arthroplasty. The article and video are available in the electronic full text archive at SpringerMedizin.de under http://www.springermedizin.de/der-orthopaede. The video can be found at the end of the article as supplementary material.

[Robotics-mechanical bridge between imaging and patient]

BACKGROUND

There are still a high number of dissatisfied knee arthroplasty patients. This situation has not changed much for decades, despite many innovations focusing on implant longevity and higher procedural precision. In this context, there is a growing discussion on possible systematic errors made in knee arthroplasty, especially regarding the alignment philosophy of the implants.

OBJECTIVE

It was reported that a more anatomical alignment might result in improved patient outcome. However, current technologies have severe limitations to achieving optimized and individual alignment. In this context, the aim of this manuscript was to assess whether image-based robot-guided knee arthroplasty might represent an opportunity for achieving individualized alignment.

METHODS

The literature on this subject was evaluated and analyzed. Furthermore, research projects and expert recommendations were discussed.

RESULTS

The precision of preoperative planning is higher with robotic techniques than with other computer-assisted or manual technologies. In addition, the individual soft tissue situation of the patient is taken into account and the prosthesis position is optimized. This ensures optimum soft tissue balancing and stability of the prosthesis.

CONCLUSION

Modern robot-assisted systems are the mechanical bridge between imaging and patient. This technique provides objective control over the results produced with alternative alignments. This applies to both the prosthesis position itself and the resulting soft tissue balancing.

Does Accelerometer-based Navigation Have Any Clinical Benefit Compared with Conventional TKA? A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Accelerometer-based navigation is a handheld navigation tool that was introduced to offer a simpler technique compared with more-cumbersome computer-assisted surgery (CAS). Considering the increasing number of adopters, it seems important to evaluate the potential clinical benefits of this technology compared with conventional TKA.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

In this systematic review, we asked: (1) Is accelerometer-based navigation more accurate than conventional TKA? (2) Does accelerometer-based navigation provide better functional outcome than conventional TKA? (3) Does accelerometer-based navigation increase surgical time or decrease the risk of complications or reoperations compared with conventional TKA?

METHODS

This systematic review included all comparative prospective and retrospective studies published in the MEDLINE/PubMed and Cochrane libraries over the last 10 years. Inclusion criteria were all studies in English that compared accelerometer-based navigation with conventional TKA. Eleven studies met these criteria with 621 knees in accelerometer-based navigation group and 677 knees in conventional TKA group. Results related to alignment, objective and subjective functional scores, duration of surgery, complications and reoperations were extracted and compared between accelerometer-based-navigation and conventional TKA. Methodological quality was assessed using Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) tool (for nonrandomized control trials) and Cochrane Risk of Bias (for randomized control trials (RCTs). All studies with fair or better quality were included. Four RCTs and six nonrandomized studies comparing accelerometer-based navigation to conventional TKA were found.

RESULTS

Inconsistent evidence on mechanical axis alignment was found, with five of nine studies slightly favoring the accelerometer-based navigation group, and the other four showing no differences between the groups. Only two of eight studies favored accelerometer-based navigation in terms of tibial component alignment in the coronal plane; the other six found no between-group differences. Similarly, mixed results were found regarding other metrics related to component alignment; a minority of studies favored accelerometer-based navigation by a small margin, and most studies found no between-group differences. Only three studies evaluated functional outcome and none of them showed a difference in range of motion or patient-reported outcomes. Most studies, six of seven, found no between-group differences concerning surgical time; one study demonstrated a slight increase in time with accelerometer-based navigation. There were no between-group differences in terms of the risk of complications, which generally were uncommon in both groups, and no reoperations or revisions were reported in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

We found conflicting evidence about whether accelerometer-based navigation reduces the number of coronal-plane outliers or improves alignment to a clinically important degree, and we found no evidence that it improves patient-reported outcomes or reduces the risk of complications or reoperations. Accelerometer-based navigation may increase surgical time. The overall quality of the evidence was low, which suggested that any observed benefits were overestimated. Given the absence of higher-quality evidence demonstrating compelling benefits of this accelerometer-based navigation technology, it should not be widely adopted.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

An accelerometer-based portable navigation system improved prosthetic alignment after total knee arthroplasty in 3D measurements

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare prosthetic alignment using three-dimensional (3D) measurements following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) performed using an accelerometer-based portable navigation system (KneeAlign2) versus the conventional technique.

METHODS

A total of 159 patients who had primary osteoarthritis of the knee with varus deformity underwent TKA. The KneeAlign2 system was used for distal femoral resection and tibial resection in 78 knees, and the conventional instrumentation (intramedullary for the femur and extramedullary for the tibia) was used in 81 knees. 3D computed tomography (CT) scans of the whole leg were taken after TKA. Femoral and tibial prosthetic alignments in the coronal, sagittal, and axial planes were measured using computer software. The operation time and estimated blood loss were calculated. Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) were evaluated using the contrast-enhanced multi-detector row CT at 1 week after TKA.

RESULTS

In the femoral coronal plane, the mean and standard deviation of prosthetic alignment from neutral alignment were 1.2° [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0°-1.4°) in the navigation group and 1.6° (95% CI 1.3°-2.0°) in the conventional group (p = 0.03). The femoral component outliers (> 3° away from the goal alignment) using the navigation system and the conventional technique were 3 and 15%, respectively, in the coronal plane (p < 0.01), and 15 and 43%, respectively, in the sagittal plane (p < 0.01). The outliers in tibial coronal and tibial sagittal planes were not statistically different between the two groups. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in operation time, blood loss, DVT, and PE.

CONCLUSION

Using an accelerometer-based portable navigation system decreased the outliers of prosthetic alignment in femoral coronal and sagittal planes, and did not increase the complications such as operation time, blood loss, DVT, and PE. To our knowledge, this study is the first to investigate the usefulness of an accelerometer-based portable navigation system using the validated 3D measurement.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Fixed Distal Femoral Cut of 6° Valgus in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Radiographic Review of 788 Consecutive Cases

BACKGROUND

In place of the mechanical axis (MA), the use of the variable tibiofemoral angle is frequently used to plan measured resection bony cuts during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This angle, coupled with operator-dependent variability of intramedullary distal femoral cutting guides, has the potential for catastrophic outcomes. Therefore, a simpler, fixed femoral cut of 6° valgus may be more appropriate when direct measurement of the MA is not possible.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 788 consecutive TKAs, in which the distal femoral cut was set to 6° valgus. The preoperative and 6-week postoperative MA were measured on hip-to-ankle radiographs. Data were evaluated as a group as well as grouped by preoperative deformity (MA < -3°, -3° < MA < 3°, 3° < MA).

RESULTS

Following TKA, MA alignment for all patients was 0.0° ± 2.3° (range, -7.0° to 8.0°). When grouped by pre-TKA alignment, 548 patients were considered varus (MA < -3°), 137 were neutral (-3° < MA < 3°), and 103 patients were valgus (3° < MA). When evaluating the post-TKA alignment achieved in the 3 groups, neutral alignment (-3° < MA < 3°) was established in 86.5% of varus patients, 86.1% of neutral patients, and 82.5% of valgus patients.

CONCLUSION

A standard distal femoral cut of 6° resulted in a neutral MA in 86% of patients. While no single technique will be correct for all deformities, in the absence of sophisticated preoperative planning aids, this simple technique could provide a more reliable surgical technique than the measured tibiofemoral angle.

How are clinical outcomes related to the deviation severity of the tibiofemoral mechanical axis on coronal plane following knee arthroplasty?

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the effect of tibiofemoral mechanical axis (TFMA) deviation severity on clinical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the patients who underwent primary TKA between January 2002 and December 2010. After applying inclusion/exclusion criteria, we evaluated 70 knees of 51 patients. The mean ± SD follow-up period was 7.08 ± 1.34 years. The knees were divided into 3 groups based on TFMAs. The first group, identified as "well aligned," included the TFMAs that were neutral within 3° (0° ± 3°) of alignment. The second group, identified as "outliers 1," included the slightly deviated TFMAs (-3° to -6° valgus and +3° to +6° varus). The third group, identified as "outliers 2," included the severely deviated TFMAs of more than 6° from neutral alignment (<-6° valgus and > + 6° varus). The clinical outcomes of each group were compared by evaluating the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), visual analog scale (VAS), and Short Form-36 physical component summary (SF-36 PCS) and mental component summary (SF-36 MCS) scores.

RESULTS

We found that OKS, SF-36 PCS, and SF-36 MCS were nearly the same in the well-aligned and outliers 1 groups but worse in the outliers 2 group. VAS scores were nearly the same in all groups. (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Function scores were impaired when the TFMA deviated more than 6° from neutral. However, the differences in clinical outcomes between well-aligned knees and those of outliers were not found to be statistically significant in the medium term.

Current concepts and future perspectives in computer-assisted navigated total knee replacement

BACKGROUND

Total knee replacements (TKR) aim to restore stability of the tibiofemoral and patella-femoral joints and provide relief of pain and improved quality of life for the patient. In recent years, computer-assisted navigation systems have been developed with the aim of reducing human error in joint alignment and improving patient outcomes.

METHODS

We examined the current body of evidence surrounding the use of navigation systems and discussed their current and future role in TKR.

RESULTS

The current body of evidence shows that the use of computer navigation systems for TKR significantly reduces outliers in the mechanical axis and coronal prosthetic position. Also, navigation systems offer an objective assessment of soft tissue balancing that had previously not been available. Although these benefits represent a technical superiority to conventional TKR techniques, there is limited evidence to show long-term clinical benefit with the use of navigation systems, with only a small number of studies showing improvement in outcome scores at short-term follow-up. Because of the increased costs and operative time associated with their use as well as the emergence of more affordable and patient-specific technologies, it is unlikely for navigation systems to become more widely used in the near future.

CONCLUSIONS

Whilst this technology helps surgeons to achieve improved component positioning, it is important to consider the clinical and functional implications, as well as the added costs and potential learning curve associated with adopting new technology.

Inadequacy of computed tomography for pre-operative planning of patellofemoral arthroplasty

PURPOSE

To evaluate the accuracy of preoperative planning for patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) by comparing: (1) virtual implant positioning simulated on pre-operative images versus (2) real implant positioning from post-operative images.

METHODS

The authors prospectively studied 15 patients that received a PFJ implant (Tornier, Montbonnot France). A pre-operative planning software was established to determine the size and position of the trochlear component. Pre-operative scans were used to perform virtual implantations by two different operators, which were then compared to the post-operative scans to calculate errors (ε) in implant positioning and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) for intra- and inter-observer repeatability.

RESULTS

Analysis was performed for 13 patients, for whom agreement between virtual and real surgery was excellent for anteroposterior (AP) position (ICC = 0.84; ε _max = 3.5 mm), fair for proximodistal (PD) position (ICC = 0.50; ε _max  = 9.5 mm), and poor for mediolateral (ML) position (ICC = 0.07; ε _max = 9.0 mm). It was fair for flexum-recurvatum (FR) alignment (ICC = 0.53; ε _max = 8.2°), poor for varus-valgus (VV) alignment (ICC = 0.34; ε _max = 10.0°), and internal-external (IE) rotation (ICC = 0.34; ε _max = 10.6°).

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-operative planning was insufficiently accurate to follow intra-operatively, the greatest errors being angular alignment (VV and FR). The clinical relevance of these findings is that PFA is difficult to plan pre/operatively due to non-visibility of cartilage on CT scans and to trochlear dysplasia in most cases.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prospective evaluation of operative tools on consecutive patients, Level III.

Twelve-Year Follow-Up of Navigated Computer-Assisted Versus Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Trial

BACKGROUND

Navigated computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was introduced to expedite long-term survival based on improved postoperative implantation accuracy. However, long-term outcome data after 10 years or more are rare, even available meta-analyses show controversial study results.

METHODS

In a prospective randomized trial, 100 conventional TKAs (group CONV) were compared with 100 computer-assisted TKAs (group NAV) after a mean follow-up of 12 years postoperatively. A long-leg weight-bearing X-ray was performed for measuring mechanical axis of the limb, lateral distal femoral angle, and medial proximal tibial angle. Tibial slope, patella alpha angle, and radiolucent lines were also observed. Clinical investigation included evaluation of 4 different scores: Insall Knee Score, Western Ontario and MacMaster University Index score, Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Score, and visual analog scale.

RESULTS

Based on a follow-up rate of at least 75%, no difference in TKA survival was found 12 years postoperatively: 91.5% in group CONV vs 98.2% in group NAV (P = .181). Since 5-year follow-up, no additional TKA revision had been performed in both groups. Group CONV showed a nonsignificant higher inaccuracy of neutral lower limb axis (1.8° ± 1.4°) compared to group NAV (1.6° ± 1.7°, P = .700). All X-ray assessments were not significant different within both study groups (P ≥ .068). Clinical examination showed no differences in evaluations (P ≥ .204). All collected outcome score results were similar (P ≥ .222).

CONCLUSION

Twelve years postoperatively, no differences were found in terms of long-term survival, implantation accuracy, clinical outcome or score results.