Analysis of Orthopaedic Research Produced During the Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan

The top-cited military relevant spine articles

Introduction

Historically musculoskeletal injury has substantially affected United States (US) service members. Lumbosacral spine injuries are among the most common sites of injury for service members across all US military branches and usually presents with pain in the lower back and extremities. The aim of this study is to identify and describe the 50 most-cited articles relevant to military medicine on the subject of the spine.

Methods

In April 2020 Web of Science was used to search the key words: spinal cord injury, spine, thoracic spine, lumbar spine, cervical spine, sacrum, sacral, cervical fusion, lumbar fusion, sacral fracture, combat, back pain, neck pain, and military. Articles published from 1900 to 2020 were evaluated for relevance to military spine orthopaedics and ranked based on citation number. The 50 most-cited articles were characterized based on country of origin, journal of publication, affiliated institution, topic, military branch, and conflict.

Results

1900 articles met search criteria. The 50 most-cited articles were cited 24 to 119 times and published between 1993 and 2017. 30 articles (60%) originated in the United States. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine accounted for the most frequent (n = 10) destination journal followed by Spine (n = 8). 37 institutions contributed to the top 50 most-cited articles. The most common article type was clinically focused retrospective analysis 36% (n = 18), clinically focused cohort study 10% (n = 5), and clinically focused cohort questionnaire, cross-sectional analysis, and randomized study 8% each (n = 4). 90% of articles were non-surgical (n = 45). The US Army had the greatest number of associated articles. Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom were the most-cited conflicts.

Conclusion

The 50 most-cited articles relevant to military spine orthopaedics are predominantly clinically focused, arising from the US, and published in Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, Spine, and The Spine Journal.

Reconstruction of firearm and blast injuries in Syrian war refugees

BACKGROUND

War injuries differ from other injuries owing to the large tissue defects they cause and their high risk of contamination. As fragments scattered by high-energy firearms and explosives cause serious composite tissue damage, repair of such injuries is difficult and requires a long treatment period. We discuss the treatment methods used for injured Syrian War refugees admitted to our clinic and present the most effective repair methods for war-related tissue defects for each region of the body.

METHODS

A total of 61 patients treated between June 2012 and April 2015 were retrospectively evaluated in terms of age, gender, duration of hospitalisation, injury site and repair method employed. The patients were grouped by region injured (head/neck, extremities and trunk).

RESULTS

The female-to-male ratio of the patients was 16/45, and their mean age was 25.2 (range, 3-51) years. Twenty-two patients were under the age of 18. The mean duration of hospitalisation was 28.5 days. A total of 130 operations were performed on the patients, including debridement and revisions. Repairs were conducted with free flaps in 17 patients (6 on the head/neck region, 11 on extremities) and with pedicle flaps in 28 patients (11 on the head/neck region, 12 on extremities, 5 on the trunk). Two patients experienced flap loss without other complications, and other patients experienced complications including bleeding, infection, flap detachment, hematoma and seroma.

CONCLUSIONS

War injuries cause tissue damage of a composite and extensive nature. Most affect the extremities, followed by the head/neck and trunk regions. They are primarily sustained by the young population, not usually easy to treat, and require long hospitalisation periods. A variety of methods may be preferred to treat these injuries.

Depression, Anxiety, and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Following Orthopedic War Injuries

Introduction

There are ongoing wars worldwide, during which significant numbers of people are injured. Several studies have indicated that high rates of depression and anxiety are seen in war-injured patients.

Methods

Eighty-one male patients treated between November 2019 and January 2021 far from home in a Turkish hospital due to war injuries that happened in the Libyan Civil War were investigated. Demographic characteristics and injury data of the patients were evaluated regarding age, Injury Severity Score (ISS), location of injuries, type and mechanism of injuries, operations, and accompanying traumas. The psychological statuses of the patients were evaluated with the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) records filled out at the first admission to the hospital.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 29.8±7.7 (19-56) years. While 59 patients had fractures, 22 patients had only soft tissue injuries. Eighteen patients suffered from other accompanying injuries. While 85.2% of the patients showed symptoms of depression, 82.7% of the patients suffered from anxiety and PTSD symptoms were seen in 86.4% of the patients. Statistical analysis was performed to investigate the effects of injury severity, duration of hospitalization, number of operations, and age on depression, anxiety, and PTSD among these patients with war injuries. The results did not indicate any significant effect of injury severity, hospitalization duration, or operations.

Conclusion

Depression, anxiety, and PTSD are common in patients injured in wars. Injury severity does not seem to affect depression, anxiety, or PTSD in these patients.

Management of orthopaedic injuries in Libyan civil war: experiences of a distant hospital

AIM OF THE STUDY

In this study, we aimed to evaluate the musculoskeletal injury types, infections, and treatments of the patients injured in Libyan civil war.

METHODS

A total of 291 patients (288 male, 3 female) treated in our clinic, between November 2011 and April 2020, were included in our retrospective study. Patients' age, injury severity score (ISS), injury type, mechanism, location, accompanying traumas, infection, and operations in Libya and in our clinic were evaluated.

RESULTS

Injuries were caused by gunshots in 172 patients, by explosives in 56, by missiles in eight, and by different mechanisms in the remaining 55 patients. Injuries were located mostly in lower extremities, followed by upper extremities and by both extremities. The most common fracture was tibial fractures, followed with femur and humerus. Plate-screw fixation was performed for 82 cases, intramedullary nailing for 42, external fixator for 41, K-wire fixation for 27, foreign body excisions for 26, arthrodesis for 15, amputation for , arthroplasty for 11, and soft tissue operations for 78. Infection was present among 50 (% 17.2) patients. Complications were seen in five patients. Three patients needed implant removal due to infection, one patient had a plate fracture, and one patient died because of sepsis.

DISCUSSION

Difficulties in the treatment of war injuries begin in the battlefield. Patients' transfers and treatments may not be provided properly due to unsuitable conditions. Hospitals in neighbouring and distant countries can be helpful for supporting the treatment of increased numbers of injured patients.

CONCLUSION

Wars cause excessive numbers of injuries. In this study, we want to show that hospitals far from war zones can be considered as alternatives for treatment of these injuries.